Inaccurate haemoglobin estimation in Waldenstrom's macroglobulinaemia

Spurious counts and spurious results on haematology analysers: a review. Part II: white blood cells, red blood cells, haemoglobin, red cell indices and reticulocytes

Haematology analysers provide quick and accurate results in most situations. However, spurious results, related either to platelets (part I of this report) or to other parameters from the cell blood count (CBC) may be observed in several instances. Spuriously low white blood cell (WBC) counts may be observed because of agglutination in the presence of ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA). Cryoglobulins, lipids, insufficiently lysed red blood cells (RBC), erythroblasts and platelet aggregates are common situations increasing WBC counts. In most of these instances flagging and/or an abnormal WBC differential scattergram will alert the operator. Several situations lead to abnormal haemoglobin measurement or to abnormal RBC count, including lipids, agglutinins, cryoglobulins and elevated WBC counts. Mean (red) cell volume (MCV) may be also subject to spurious determination, because of agglutinins, excess of glucose or salts and technological considerations. In turn, abnormality related to one measured parameter will lead to abnormal calculated RBC indices: mean cell haemoglobin content (MCHC) is certainly the most important RBC indices to consider, as it is as important as flags generated by the haematology analysers (HA) in alerting the user to a spurious result. In many circumstances, several of the measured parameters from CBC may be altered, and the discovery of a spurious change on one parameter frequently means that the validity of other parameters should be considered. Sensitive flags now allow the identification of several spurious counts, but only the most sophisticated HA have optimal flagging and more simple HA, especially those without a WBC differential scattergram, do not possess the same sensitivity for detecting anomalous results. Reticulocytes are integrated now into the CBC in many HA, and several situations may lead to abnormal counts.

Overestimation of hemoglobin in a patient with an IgA-kappa monoclonal gammopathy

A patient with multiple myeloma had an automated blood count performed on a Coulter STK-S counter that repeatedly failed internal limits for both mean corpuscular hemoglobin and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration. The calculated hematocrit agreed with a spun hematocrit, suggesting that the hemoglobin concentration was being overestimated by the automated counter. Measurement of the plasma hemoglobin concentration of the sample, which showed no visible hemolysis, gave a hemoglobin concentration of 32 g/L on the STK-S analyzer. Correction of the whole blood hemoglobin using the plasma hemoglobin gave a value consistent with the hematocrit. The corrected mean corpuscular hemoglobin and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration values were within standard limits. This patient's paraprotein was characterized as IgA-kappa and was present at a concentration of 61 g/L. The hemoglobin concentration measured on whole blood by Sysmex NE 8000 and Technicon H*1E autoanalyzers agreed reasonably well with the corrected result from the STK-S.