Temporal artery biopsy: is there any value in examining biopsies at multiple levels?

Giant cell arteritis: reviewing the advancing diagnostics and management

Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) is well known to be a critical ischaemic disease that requires immediate medical recognition to initiate treatment and where one in five people still suffer visual loss. The immunopathophysiology has continued to be characterised, and the influencing of ageing in the development of GCA is beginning to be understood. Recent national and international guidelines have supported the directed use of cranial ultrasound to reduce diagnostic delay and improve clinical outcomes. Immediate high dose glucocorticoids remain the standard emergency treatment for GCA, with a number of targeted agents that have been shown in clinical trials to have superior clinical efficacy and steroid sparing effects. The aim of this review was to present the latest advances in GCA that have the potential to influence routine clinical practice.

Temporal artery biopsy

Giant cell arteritis is a common vasculitis in patients over the age of 50 years old. If not promptly recognized and aggressively treated with high-dose glucocorticoids, ischemia resulting in permanent vision loss or stroke can occur. Yet, the treatment with high-dose glucocorticoids over a long period of time can be problematic in this particular patient population given their age and associated comorbidities. Temporal artery biopsies (TAB) are an important diagnostic tool to evaluate patients with suspected giant cell arteritis. Herein, we explore indications for TAB and practical points in obtaining a TAB based on available evidence. We review the surgical procedure itself and associated complications. Lastly, we examine common pathological findings and considerations of alternative diagnoses.

Updates on the diagnosis and monitoring of giant cell arteritis

This mini-review offers a critical appraisal of the currently employed imaging or histopathological tools to diagnose and monitor giant cell arteritis (GCA). An overview of the most updated evidence and current application of color duplex ultrasonography (US), temporal artery biopsy (TAB), 18-fluorodeoxyglucose [18F] FDG-PET/CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography angiography is provided. The main limitations of each tool, and the most relevant research developments are discussed. The review highlights the complementary value of the available modalities to ensure a correct diagnosis of GCA, and to provide valuable prognostic information. Novel evidence is accumulating to support the role of imaging, and particularly US, as a monitoring tool for the disease, opening new perspectives for the future management of large vessel vasculitis.

What to Know About Biopsy Sampling and Pathology in Vasculitis?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the histologic findings of vasculitis, and to give some practical considerations on biopsy samples.

RECENT FINDINGS

The larger use of imaging and the discoveries of serological markers in the diagnosis of vasculitis have increased the clinical recognition of these entities. Nevertheless, biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis in most cases. So far, biopsies are also useful to obtain information about prognosis and to guide a more specific treatment. In recent years, less invasive diagnostic approaches have become available, lowering the risks related to the procedure and permitting a definite diagnosis in most cases. Histological examination permits a definite diagnosis of vasculitis. However, the findings may be nonspecific if not evaluated in the proper clinical setting. The interaction between clinicians and pathologists is crucial to obtain a definite diagnosis.

Association Between Specimen Length and Number of Sections and Diagnostic Yield of Temporal Artery Biopsy for Giant Cell Arteritis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between specimen length and number of sections evaluated and the diagnostic yield of temporal artery biopsy (TAB) for giant cell arteritis (GCA).

METHODS

A pathologist reviewed all TABs performed for suspected GCA between January 1991 and December 2012. The blocks of all the inadequate and negative biopsy specimens were recut, and further slides at deeper levels were stained with hematoxylin and eosin in order to avoid missing inflammatory changes.

RESULTS

In total, findings from 662 TABs were included in the study (71% female; mean age 73.2 years). A total of 427 TAB specimens (65%) were classified as negative, and 235 (35%) were classified as positive for GCA. Compared to those with negative TAB results, patients with positive TAB results were older and more frequently female. There was no difference in postfixation TAB specimen length between TAB specimens negative and positive for GCA (mean 6.5 mm versus 6.9 mm; P = 0.068). Cuts of additional biopsy sections revealed inflammation at deeper levels in 26 of 408 TAB specimens (6.4%) originally reported as uninflamed. The inflamed section was the second in 14 TAB specimens, the third in 9 specimens, and the fourth in 3 specimens. Piecewise logistic regression identified 5 mm as the TAB specimen length change point for diagnostic sensitivity. Compared to a TAB specimen length of <5 mm, the age- and sex-adjusted odds ratio for positive TAB results in samples ≥5 mm long was 1.5 (95% confidence interval 1.0-2.0), P = 0.032.

CONCLUSION

A postfixation TAB specimen length of at least 5 mm should be sufficient to make a histologic diagnosis of GCA. In order not to miss inflammatory changes, at least 3 further sections at deeper levels should be evaluated in all negative TAB specimens.

The Adequate Number of Histopathology Cross-sections of Temporal Artery Biopsy in Establishing the Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis

Purpose

To determine the appropriate number of histopathological cross-sections that are required for a conclusive diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA).

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, the number of sections per slide for paraffin-embedded blocks for 100 randomly selected cases where GCA was suspected and those for negative temporal artery biopsies (TABs) were compared with the number of cross-sections per specimen for eight positive-TABs. All aforementioned examinations were conducted at our center from 2012 to 2016. Then, negative-TABs were retrieved and re-evaluated using light microscopy considering the histopathological findings of GCA.

Results

Ninety-five paraffin blocks were retrieved. The original mean biopsy length was 15.39 ± 7.56 mm. Comparison of the mean number of cross-sections per specimen for both the positive- and negative-TABs (9.25 ± 3.37 and 9.53 ± 2.46) showed that 9.87 ± 2.77 [95% confidence intervals (CI)] cross-sections per specimen were sufficient for a precise GCA diagnosis. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean biopsy length (P = 0.142) among the eight positive-TABs. Similarly, no significant difference was observed in the number of cross-sections per specimen (P = 0.990) for positive-TABs compared to those for the negative-TABs. After the retrieval of negative-TABs, the mean number of total pre- and post-retrieval cross-sections per specimen was 17.66 ± 4.43. Among all retrieved specimens, only one case (0.01%) showed the histopathological features of healed arteritis.

Conclusion

Positive-TABs did not reveal more histological cross-sections than the negative ones and increasing the number of cross-sections did not enhance the accuracy of TAB.

Sensitivity of temporal artery biopsy in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is a reference test for the diagnosis of GCA but reveals inflammatory changes only in a subset of patients. The lack of knowledge of TAB sensitivity hampers comparisons with non-invasive techniques such as temporal artery ultrasonography. We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to estimate the sensitivity of TAB in GCA and to identify factors that may influence the estimate.

METHODS

A systematic literature review involved searching electronic databases and cross-references. Eligibility criteria included publications reporting at least 30 GCA cases fulfilling the original or modified 1990 ACR classification criteria. The pooled proportion of TAB-positive GCA cases was calculated by using aggregated-data meta-analysis with a random-effects model and assessment of heterogeneity with the I2 statistic. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were used to examine the effect of patient and study characteristics on TAB positivity.

RESULTS

Among 3820 publications screened, 32 studies (3092 patients) published during 1993-2017 were analysed. The pooled proportion of TAB-positive GCA cases was 77.3% (95% CI: 71.8, 81.9%), with high between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 90%). The proportion of TAB-positive cases was slightly higher in publications before than in 2012 and after (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The estimated sensitivity of 77% provides indirect evidence that TAB is not less sensitive than temporal artery imaging. The unexplained high between-study heterogeneity could result from differences in TAB sampling, processing or interpretation. The decrease in TAB-positive GCA cases over time could reflect an increasing propensity for clinicians to accept a GCA diagnosis without proof by TAB.

Evaluation of deeper levels in initially negative temporal artery biopsies and likelihood of a positive result

Giant cell arteritis is a vasculitis that affects large- and medium-sized vessels in patients over the age of 50 years. The demonstration of granulomatous arteritis is the criterion standard to establish a definitive diagnosis. However, temporal arteritis is known to discontinuously involve the artery, and there is no standardization of the number of sections which should be examined in a length of sampled artery. The goal of the study is to determine, if by examining additional sections from temporal artery (TA) biopsy cases initially interpreted as negative, do we uncover cases of vasculitis. We conducted a retrospective review of the clinical and histologic features of 75 consecutive temporal artery biopsy cases. Our findings showed that the vast majority (94%) of cases that were biopsy "proven" to be negative for temporal arteritis on initial examination remained negative after examination of all subsequent deeper levels (median of 337 total levels examined). These cases were less likely to show classical GCA signs and symptoms and typically presented at a younger age than the biopsy-positive cases. However, 4 (6%) of the initially "biopsy-negative" cases did turn out to be positive on deeper levels, with 56, 109, 346, and 590 total levels examined, respectively. At least 2 of these 4 patients did not receive prednisone or were weaned off prednisone treatment and experienced persistent/recurrent GCA symptoms. We conclude that routine sampling may miss the diagnosis in a subset of cases and in some cases, sectioning deeper into the paraffin block may be warranted.

Utility and Practicality of Multi-level Sectioning and Upfront Unstained Slide Cutting in Head and Neck Biopsies: A Critical Analysis

Upfront interval sectioning (cutting unstained slides between H&E levels) is used at our institution for biopsies at all sites except the gastrointestinal tract. Very limited data exists in the literature for the need for interval sectioning, and we are aware of no data at all for the head and neck. Biopsies from the larynx, oral cavity, pharynx, and sinonasal tract at our institution have had 5 levels cut. Levels 1, 3, and 5 or levels 2 and 5 had been stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), depending on the subsite, and the remaining slides saved for possible later use. We retrospectively evaluated the use of unstained slides at these sites for clinical utility and efficiency by analyzing 3 years of cases from 1/1/2014 to 12/30/2016. A cutoff of 10% utilization was considered justification for continued upfront unstained slide cutting. We collected 706 larynx, 572 oral cavity, 184 pharynx, and 85 sinonasal tract biopsies over 3 years. The overall rate of unstained slide usage was 18.2%. Usage rates were significantly different by site: 7.8% (55/706) for larynx, 21.9% (125/572) for oral cavity, 30.6% (26/85) for sinonasal tract and 40.8% (75/184) for pharynx (p < 0.0001). The most common stain ordered in the pharynx was p16 immunohistochemistry (59.7%), but it was Grocott methenamine silver staining in the larynx (74.5%), oral cavity (70.4%), and sinonasal tract (35.1%). Usage of unstained slides was lowest for the larynx, and review of the biopsies with unstained slides utilized showed that the lesion was present on the 3rd H&E level in all cases. Removing this practice would have translated to saving 1,378 unstained slides. Upfront interval sectioning makes practical sense for biopsies from most sites in the head and neck, especially the pharynx, but our data suggests it can reasonably be forgone at least for biopsies of the larynx.

Review: What Is the Current Evidence for Disease Subsets in Giant Cell Arteritis?

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is an autoimmune vasculitis affecting large and medium‐sized arteries. Ample evidence indicates that GCA is a heterogeneous disease in terms of symptoms, immune pathology, and response to treatment. In the current review, we discuss the evidence for disease subsets in GCA. We describe clinical and immunologic characteristics that may impact the risk of cranial ischemic symptoms, relapse rates, and long‐term glucocorticoid requirements in patients with GCA. In addition, we discuss both proven and putative immunologic targets for therapy in patients with GCA who have an unfavorable prognosis. Finally, we provide recommendations for further research on disease subsets in GCA.

The Role of Ultrasound Compared to Biopsy of Temporal Arteries in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis (TABUL): a diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness study

BACKGROUND

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a relatively common form of primary systemic vasculitis, which, if left untreated, can lead to permanent sight loss. We compared ultrasound as an alternative diagnostic test with temporal artery biopsy, which may be negative in 9-61% of true cases.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ultrasound with biopsy in diagnosing patients with suspected GCA.

DESIGN

Prospective multicentre cohort study.

SETTING

Secondary care.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 381 patients referred with newly suspected GCA.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Sensitivity, specificity and cost-effectiveness of ultrasound compared with biopsy or ultrasound combined with biopsy for diagnosing GCA and interobserver reliability in interpreting scan or biopsy findings.

RESULTS

We developed and implemented an ultrasound training programme for diagnosing suspected GCA. We recruited 430 patients with suspected GCA. We analysed 381 patients who underwent both ultrasound and biopsy within 10 days of starting treatment for suspected GCA and who attended a follow-up assessment (median age 71.1 years; 72% female). The sensitivity of biopsy was 39% [95% confidence interval (CI) 33% to 46%], which was significantly lower than previously reported and inferior to ultrasound (54%, 95% CI 48% to 60%); the specificity of biopsy (100%, 95% CI 97% to 100%) was superior to ultrasound (81%, 95% CI 73% to 88%). If we scanned all suspected patients and performed biopsies only on negative cases, sensitivity increased to 65% and specificity was maintained at 81%, reducing the need for biopsies by 43%. Strategies combining clinical judgement (clinician's assessment at 2 weeks) with the tests showed sensitivity and specificity of 91% and 81%, respectively, for biopsy and 93% and 77%, respectively, for ultrasound; cost-effectiveness (incremental net monetary benefit) was £485 per patient in favour of ultrasound with both cost savings and a small health gain. Inter-rater analysis revealed moderate agreement among sonographers (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.75), similar to pathologists (0.62, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.76).

LIMITATIONS

There is no independent gold standard diagnosis for GCA. The reference diagnosis used to determine accuracy was based on classification criteria for GCA that include clinical features at presentation and biopsy results.

CONCLUSION

We have demonstrated the feasibility of providing training in ultrasound for the diagnosis of GCA. Our results indicate better sensitivity but poorer specificity of ultrasound compared with biopsy and suggest some scope for reducing the role of biopsy. The moderate interobserver agreement for both ultrasound and biopsy indicates scope for improving assessment and reporting of test results and challenges the assumption that a positive biopsy always represents GCA.

FUTURE WORK

Further research should address the issue of an independent reference diagnosis, standards for interpreting and reporting test results and the evaluation of ultrasound training, and should also explore the acceptability of these new diagnostic strategies in GCA.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Poor Predictive Value of Isolated Adventitial and Periadventitial Infiltrates in Temporal Artery Biopsies for Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the diagnostic value of inflammation limited to the adventitia (ILA), and isolated vasa vasorum or small-vessel vasculitis (VVV, SVV) in temporal artery biopsies (TAB) for giant cell arteritis (GCA).

METHODS

Two pathologists reviewed consecutive first TAB. Using the clinical diagnoses as the gold standard, positive predictive values (PPV) were calculated.

RESULTS

Among the 75 patients without classic TAB features of GCA, 8 had GCA diagnoses. The PPV of ILA, VVV, and SVV seen by either or both pathologists were 17%, 0%, and 7%, and 17%, 0%, and 10%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

(Peri)adventitial infiltrates in TAB poorly predict GCA.

Value of temporal artery biopsy length in diagnosing giant cell arteritis

BACKGROUND

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is considered an ophthalmological emergency with severe sight and life-threatening sequelae. Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is the current gold standard for the diagnosis of GCA; however, the required length of biopsy remains an issue of contention in the literature.

METHODS

Retrospective case-control study of a consecutive cohort of 545 patients who had undergone TABs across five hospitals between 1 January 1992 and 1 January 2016. In patients with either positive or negative TABs, we collected age, sex, biopsy length and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR).

RESULTS

A total of 538 patients were included in the final analysis. Of these, 23.4% of TABs were positive, with the average length being 17.6 mm. There was a significant difference in means for positive (19.9 mm) and negative (16.8 mm) biopsies (P = 0.0009). Each millimetre increase in TAB length increased the odds of a positive TAB by 3.4% (P = 0.024). A cut-off point of ≥15 mm increased the odds of a positive TAB by 2.25 compared with a TAB <15 mm (P = 0.003). We also found that ESR ≥50 mm/h was a very strong predictor for a positive TAB result (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Biopsy length and ESR were significant predictors of a pathological diagnosis of GCA. We also found that the optimal length threshold predictive for GCA was 15 mm in order to avoid a false-negative GCA diagnosis. Although TAB remains the gold standard for diagnosis, clinicians should refer to both clinical and pathological data to guide their management.

Is all inflammation within temporal artery biopsies temporal arteritis?

Temporal arteritis peaks during the eighth decade, affecting patients with frequent comorbidities who are especially prone to adverse effects of corticosteroid therapy. Perivascular inflammation involving small periadventitial vessels is not uncommon in otherwise normal temporal artery biopsies (TABs). As ischemic events occur in patients with non-temporal artery--based inflammation, it has been recommended that any vascular inflammation within TABs be treated with corticosteroids. We sought to determine whether such patients are at increased risk for temporal arteritis-like adverse events compared with age-matched controls devoid of inflammatory infiltrates. TABs without transmural temporal arteritic damage accessioned between 2002 and 2012 were reviewed for inflammation (>15 perivascular lymphocytes) involving small blood vessels and/or temporal artery adventitia. Of 343 TABs, 278 (81%) were negative for transmural arteritis. Inflammation involving small vessels and/or temporal artery adventitia was present in 56 cases (20%). Age-matched controls were available for 39 cases. With a mean follow-up of 5 years (range, 1-11 years), 6/39 (15%) of patients developed stroke or cardiovascular events or died compared with 7/39 (18%) of age-matched controls. None of the patients with study-positive TAB had documented steroid therapy before or after TAB. Our results demonstrate that patients with inflammation involving only small vessels or temporal artery adventitia are not at increased risk for temporal arteritis-like adverse events, and suggest that the risks of protracted corticosteroid therapy in this elderly population likely exceed any potential benefits. We advise against diagnosing vasculitis in the absence of temporal arteritic damage.

Temporal artery biopsy size does not matter

This study aimed to clarify whether positive temporal artery biopsies had a greater sample length than negative biopsies in temporal arteritis. It has been suggested that biopsy length should be at least 1 cm to improve diagnostic accuracy. A retrospective review of 149 patients who had 151 temporal artery biopsies was conducted. Twenty biopsies were positive (13.3%), 124 negative (82.1%) and seven samples were insufficient (4.6%). There was no clinically significant difference in the mean biopsy size between positive (0.7 cm) and negative samples (0.65 cm) ( t-test: p = .43 NS). Ninety-four patients fulfilled all three ACR criteria prior to biopsy (62.3%) and four patients (2.6%) changed ACR score from 2 to 3 after biopsy. Treatment should not be delayed in anticipation of the biopsy or withheld in the case of a negative biopsy if the patient’s symptoms improve.

Small-vessel vasculitis surrounding an uninflamed temporal artery and isolated vasa vasorum vasculitis of the temporal artery: two subsets of giant cell arteritis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the frequency and clinical characteristics of periadventitial small-vessel vasculitis (SVV) and isolated vasa vasorum vasculitis (VVV).

METHODS

We identified 455 temporal artery biopsies performed in residents of Reggio Emilia, Italy between 1986 and 2003. Slides of temporal artery biopsy specimens were reviewed by a pathologist who was blinded with regard to clinical data. SVV was defined as inflammation of the small vessels external to the temporal artery adventitia, and VVV was defined as isolated inflammation of temporal artery vasa vasorum. Medical records of patients with SVV and/or VVV were reviewed, and demographic, clinical, laboratory, and followup data were collected. For comparison purposes, we collected the same data from an equal number of randomly selected patients with evidence of classic giant cell arteritis (GCA).

RESULTS

Sixteen patients had SVV, 18 had isolated VVV, and 5 had both SVV and VVV. Compared with patients with classic GCA, the frequencies of headache, scalp tenderness, abnormalities of temporal arteries, jaw claudication, anorexia, and weight loss, the levels of acute-phase reactant at diagnosis, and the initial and cumulative doses prednisone were significantly lower and the frequency of peripheral synovitis was higher in the patients with SVV, and the frequency of cranial ischemic events was similar in the 2 groups. In contrast, the clinical characteristics and erythrocyte sedimentation rate at diagnosis of patients with isolated VVV were similar to those of patients with classic GCA.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that isolated VVV and SVV should be considered part of the histopathologic spectrum of GCA.

Temporal Small-Vessel Inflammation in Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis: Clinical Course and Preliminary Immunohistopathologic Characterization

Objective.

To investigate the occurrence, clinical correlates, and immunohistochemical phenotype of temporal small-vessel inflammation (TSVI) in temporal artery biopsies from patients presenting with clinical features of giant cell arteritis (GCA).

Methods.

We retrospectively reviewed 41 temporal artery biopsy specimens for the presence of inflammatory infiltrates in small vessels external to the temporal artery adventitia (TSVI); 33 had sufficient clinical and pathological data for detailed analysis. Clinical and laboratory features at presentation and corticosteroid treatment patterns of patients with isolated TSVI were compared to those of patients with positive and negative biopsies. The cellular composition of the infiltrates was further characterized by immunohistochemistry.

Results.

Twenty-three (70%) specimens had evidence of TSVI including 10 with concurrent GCA and 13 (39%) with isolated TSVI. TSVI was found in all positive temporal artery biopsies. The proportion of macrophages and of lymphocyte subpopulations differed between infiltrates observed in TSVI and those of the main temporal artery wall. Initial erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was similar in the TSVI and positive biopsy groups and was significantly higher than in the negative biopsy group. Patients with isolated TSVI more often had symptoms of polymyalgia rheumatica compared to the positive biopsy group. Patients with TSVI received corticosteroid doses that were intermediate between patients with positive and those with negative biopsies.

Conclusion.

A significant number of patients with clinical features of GCA demonstrated isolated TSVI. Differences in the clinical presentation and cellular composition suggest that TSVI may represent a subset of GCA and should be considered in the interpretation of temporal artery biopsies and treatment decisions.

Limited Value of Temporal Artery Ultrasonography Examinations for Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis: Analysis of 77 Subjects

Objective.

Use of TA-US for diagnostic investigation of giant cell arteritis (GCA) has been proposed but remains a matter of debate because of the heterogeneous findings. We retrospectively evaluated operating characteristics of temporal artery ultrasonography (TA-US) in a single teaching hospital.

Methods.

All subjects with suspected GCA had been seen between 2002 and 2008 and had undergone TA-US with continuous-wave Doppler (until 2004) or color duplex ultrasonography (after 2004), followed within 30 days by a temporal artery biopsy (TAB). TA-US findings were compared with TAB-proven GCA and clinically diagnosed GCA. Results are expressed as sensitivities, specificities, and positive (LR+) and negative likelihood ratios (LR−) of stenoses, occlusions, and the halo sign; for the latter, only color duplex TA-US was considered.

Results.

Seventy-seven patients fulfilled the selection criteria; 13 had TAB-proven and 19 had clinically defined GCA. Stenoses/occlusions were seen on 45.5% of TA-US and the halo sign was seen only once (3.2%) in 31 duplex TA-US. Respective sensitivities, specificities, LR+, and LR− for GCA diagnosis (using TAB-proven/clinically defined GCA as reference standards) were 69%/53%, 59%/57%, 1.7/1.2, and 0.5/0.8 for stenoses and/or occlusions, and 17%/10%, 100%/100%, infinite/infinite, and 0.8/0.9 for the halo sign.

Conclusion.

The halo sign showed 100% specificity for GCA but only 10%–17% sensitivity. Stenoses/occlusions were of low diagnostic value. These observations suggest that TA-US is neither an effective substitute for TAB nor a reliable screening test to decide which patients can be safely spared TAB.

Epidemiological and clinical features of giant cell arteritis in Tunisia

BACKGROUND

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a systemic vasculitis of the elderly that could result in vision loss or even be life threatening. Unlike western countries, this disease is considered exceptional in Tunisia.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to determine epidemiological and clinical features of GCA in Tunisian population and to identify management difficulties.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multicentric study of 96 patients in whom GCA was diagnosed between 1986 and 2003. All patients fulfilled the ACR criteria for classification of GCA.

RESULTS

The majority of cases (77%) were diagnosed since 1994. The male/female ratio was 0.88 and the mean age at the time of diagnosis was 70.8+/-7.7 years. Clinical features were characterized by gradual onset in 64.4% of cases. The most frequent clinical manifestations were headache (91.7%), abnormalities in temporal arteries (85.4%), severe ischemic manifestations (80.2%), constitutional symptoms (75%), and polymyalgia rheumatica (56.3%). Biological inflammatory syndrome was noted in all patients. Temporal artery biopsy established histological diagnosis in 73% of cases. All patients were treated by corticosteroids. Remission was obtained in 45.6%. Relapses occurred in 40.4% of cases and 30 patients were still receiving corticosteroids at the time of study. Four patients died and irreversible ischemic complications were noted in 15.6% of cases. Steroid adverse effects occurred in 56 patients.

CONCLUSION

GCA is not exceptional to Tunisia. It occurs amongst elderly patients with no female predominance noticed. Clinical features are similar to those reported in other series.

Neuro-ophthalmic complications in giant cell arteritis

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a medical emergency characterized by systemic inflammation and critical ischemia. Neuro-ophthalmic complications occur early, with permanent vision loss in up to one fifth of patients. This mainly results from failure of prompt recognition and treatment. Diagnosis of GCA is often preceded by unrecognized symptoms, including constitutional upset and jaw claudication. Features predictive of permanent visual loss include jaw claudication and temporal artery abnormalities on physical examination. These patients often do not mount high inflammatory responses. Modern imaging techniques show diagnostic promise, and have led to an increased recognition of major artery involvement in GCA. However, temporal artery biopsy remains the gold standard for investigation. Intimal hyperplasia on histologic examination is associated with neuro-ophthalmic complications. The mainstay of therapy remains corticosteroids. Experience using conventional disease-modifying drugs has been mixed, and biologic therapies require further evaluation for their steroid-sparing potential.

Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant-cell arteritis

Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant-cell arteritis are closely related disorders that affect people of middle age and older. They frequently occur together. Both are syndromes of unknown cause, but genetic and environmental factors might have a role in their pathogenesis. The symptoms of polymyalgia rheumatica seem to be related to synovitis of proximal joints and extra-articular synovial structures. Giant-cell arteritis primarily affects the aorta and its extracranial branches. The clinical findings in giant-cell arteritis are broad, but commonly include visual loss, headache, scalp tenderness, jaw claudication, cerebrovascular accidents, aortic arch syndrome, thoracic aorta aneurysm, and dissection. Glucocorticosteroids are the cornerstone of treatment of both polymyalgia rheumatica and giant-cell arteritis. Some patients have a chronic course and might need glucocorticosteroids for several years. Adverse events of glucocorticosteroids affect more than 50% of patients. Trials of steroid-sparing drugs have yielded conflicting results. A greater understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis should provide new targets for therapy.

Temporal artery biopsy for diagnosing giant cell arteritis: the longer, the better?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relation between temporal artery biopsy (TAB) length and diagnostic sensitivity for giant cell arteritis.

METHODS

Histological TAB reports generated from four hospital pathology departments were reviewed for demographics, histological findings, and formalin fixed TAB lengths. A biopsy was considered positive for giant cell arteritis if there was a mononuclear cell infiltrate predominating at the media-intima junction or in the media.

RESULTS

Among 1821 TAB reports reviewed, 287 (15.8%) were excluded because of missing data, sampling errors, or age < 50 years. Mean TAB length of the 1520 datasets finally analysed (67.2% women; mean (SD) age, 73.1 (10.0) years) was 1.33 (0.73) cm. Histological evidence of giant cell arteritis was found in 223 specimens (14.7%), among which 164 (73.5%) contained giant cells. Statistical analyses, including piecewise logistic regression, identified 0.5 cm as the TAB length change point for diagnostic sensitivity. Compared with TAB length of < 0.5 cm, the respective odds ratios for positive TAB without and with multinucleated giant cells in samples > or = 0.5 cm long were 5.7 (95% confidence interval, 1.4 to 23.6) and 4.0 (0.97 to 16.5).

CONCLUSIONS

A fixed TAB length of at least 0.5 cm could be sufficient to make a histological diagnosis of giant cell arteritis.

A case of biopsy-negative temporal arteritis--diagnostic challenges

A patient with systemic symptoms but no visual loss was investigated for suspected giant cell arteritis. Initial temporal artery biopsy was reported as negative; however, she returned with visual loss 2 months later, and the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis was confirmed with a subsequent biopsy. In hindsight, signs suggestive of the disease were present in the original biopsy, although the usual diagnostic features were absent.

Giant cell arteritis

Giant cell arteritis (GCA), temporal arteritis or Horton's arteritis, is a systemic vasculitis which involves large and medium sized vessels, especially the extracranial branches of the carotid arteries, in persons usually older than 50 years. Permanent visual loss, ischaemic strokes, and thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms are feared complications of GCA. The treatment consists of high dose steroids. Mortality, with a correct treatment, in patients with GCA seems to be similar that of controls.

Proactive management of histopathology workloads: analysis of the UK Royal College of Pathologists' recommendations on specimens of limited or no clinical value on the workload of a teaching hospital gastrointestinal pathology service

AIMS

To investigate the effect on the workload of a gastrointestinal pathology service of implementing the recommendations of the Royal College of Pathologists' (RCPath) working party on specimens of limited or no clinical value (LONCV).

METHODS

All endoscopic gastrointestinal pathology reports for the first three months of 2001 at a large teaching hospital were reviewed against the RCPath recommendations. Specimens in the category of LONCV were recorded and the final histopathology diagnosis noted.

RESULTS

The biopsies in the LONCV category were 30% of oesophageal, 61% of gastric, 0.5% of duodenal, and 7% of colorectal origin.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing the RCPath recommendations would reduce the number of requests for the examination of gastrointestinal endoscopic specimens by 3500 specimens each year in this department. None of the specimens in the LONCV category showed an abnormality that could not have been detected by a more efficient and less invasive method. In the UK, where there is a severe shortage of trained histopathologists, the implementation of these recommendations would ensure that these scarce resources are not misused.

The significance of perivascular inflammation in the absence of arteritis in temporal artery biopsy specimens

We retrospectively compared 81 temporal artery biopsy specimens demonstrating perivascular inflammation without evidence of temporal arteritis and 76 specimens demonstrating no inflammation. Patients with perivascular inflammation included 43 women (mean age, 71.2 years). Nineteen patients met the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for the diagnosis of temporal arteritis. All patients demonstrated chronic perivascular inflammation consisting primarily of lymphocytes. Granulomas were noted in 4 specimens. Internal elastic lamina disruption, intimal fibroplasia, and dystrophic calcification were noted in 86 arteries examined. Fibrosis or scarring of the vessel walls was observed in 10 specimens. Corticosteroid therapy was beneficial to 33 of 56 patients. In patients with no evidence of inflammation (50 women; mean age, 66.6 years), 21 met ACR criteria for temporal arteritis. Histologically, disruption of the elastic lamina was noted in 75 of 81 arteries biopsied, intimal fibroplasia in 66, microcalcifications in 5, and fibrosis or scarring in 5. In this group, 47 patients received corticosteroid therapy; clinical improvement was noted in 28. Patients with chronic perivascular inflammation but no arteritis seem no more likely to have temporal arteritis on clinical grounds than similar patients without inflammation on biopsy.