Can lumbar spine bone mineral density predict readmission in denosumab-treated patients with chronic kidney disease?

Factors associated with readmission in chronic kidney disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Risk factors associated with all-cause hospital readmission are poorly characterised in patients with chronic kidney disease.

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to identify risk factors and protectors of hospital readmission in chronic kidney disease.

DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS & MEASUREMENTS

Studies involving adult patients were identified from four databases from inception to 31/03/2020. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to determine factors associated with all-cause 30-day hospital readmission in general chronic kidney disease, in dialysis and in kidney transplant recipient groups.

RESULTS

Eighty relevant studies (chronic kidney disease, n = 14 studies; dialysis, n = 34 studies; and transplant, n = 32 studies) were identified. Meta-analysis revealed that in both chronic kidney disease and transplant groups, increasing age in years and days spent at the hospital during the initial stay were associated with a higher risk of 30-day readmission. Other risk factors identified included increasing body mass index (kg/m2 ) in the transplant group, and functional impairment and discharge destination in the dialysis group. Within the chronic kidney disease ​​​​group, having an outpatient follow-up appointment with a nephrologist within 14 days of discharge was protective against readmission but this was not protective if provided by a primary care provider or a cardiologist.

CONCLUSION

Risk-reduction interventions that can be implemented include a nephrologist appointment within 14 days of hospital discharge, rehabilitation programme for functional improvement in the dialysis group and meal plans in the transplant group. Future risk analysis should focus on modifiable factors to ensure that strategies can be tested and implemented in those who are more at risk.

Hypocalcemia and bone mineral density changes following denosumab treatment in end-stage renal disease patients: a meta-analysis of observational studies

The incidence of hypocalcemia and bone mineral density (BMD) changes in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on denosumab remains unclear. We performed this meta-analysis to assess the incidence of denosumab-associated hypocalcemia and effects of denosumab on BMD in ESRD patients. A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database from inception through November 2017 to identify studies evaluating incidence of denosumab-associated hypocalcemia and changes in serum calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), parathyroid hormone (PTH), and BMD from baseline to post-treatment course of denosumab in ESRD patients. Study results were pooled and analyzed using a random-effect model. The protocol for this meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; no. CRD42017081074). Six observational studies with a total of 84 ESRD patients were enrolled. The pooled estimated incidence of hypocalcemia during denosumab treatment was 42% (95% CI 29-55%, I² = 0%). Hypocalcemia occurred approximately 7 to 20 days after the first dose and reached nadir of low calcium levels in the first 2 weeks up to 2 months. However, there were no significant changes in serum calcium or phosphate from baseline to post-treatment course (≥ 3 months after treatment) with mean differences [MDs] of 0.20 mg/dL (95% CI, - 0.30 to 0.69 mg/dL) and - 0.10 mg/dL (95% CI, - 0.70 to 0.49 mg/dL). There were significant reductions in ALP and PTH levels with standardized mean differences (SMDs) of - 0.65 (95% CI - 1.13 to - 0.16) and - 1.89 (95% CI - 3.44 to - 0.34), respectively. There were significant increases in T-scores with MDs of 0.39 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.69) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.98) for lumbar spine and femoral neck, respectively. Our study demonstrates the estimated incidence of denosumab-associated hypocalcemia in dialysis patients of 42%. From baseline to post-treatment course, although there are no differences in serum calcium and phosphate, our findings suggest significant reductions in ALP and PTH and a significant increase in BMD. Currently, denosumab should not be considered as the treatment of choice in ESRD patients until more safety and efficacy data are available.