Does aspirin use reduce the risk for cancer?

Effect of aspirin on incidence, recurrence, and mortality in prostate cancer patients: integrating evidence from randomized controlled trials and real-world studies

PURPOSE

Aspirin has been suggested to reduce the risk of cancer. However, previous studies have been inconsistent regarding the relationship between aspirin use and the risk of occurrence of prostate cancer (PCa). The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of aspirin on clinical outcomes in patients with PCa in a meta-analysis and to explore the possible dose-response relationship.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in 10 electronic databases and 4 registries. The combined relative risks (RRs) were calculated using a random-effects model with 95% confidence interval (CIs) to assess the effect of aspirin on the risk of PCa. Relevant subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The across studies results show that aspirin use associated with lower incidence of PCa (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.95-0.98), and reduced mortality (RR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.82-0.95). The results of the subgroup analysis indicated that both cohort and population studies in the Americas showed a reduction in PCa incidence and mortality with aspirin use. A linear correlation was observed between dosage/duration of aspirin use and its protective effect. Additionally, post-diagnosis aspirin use was associated with decreased risk of PCa mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis revealed an independent correlation between the use of aspirin and reductions in both the incidence and mortality rates of PCa. However, randomized controlled trials did not find any association between aspirin use and PCa. Furthermore, the impact of aspirin on PCa occurrence was found to be dependent on both dosage and duration.

Aspirin, metformin, and statin use on the risk of gastric cancer: A nationwide population-based cohort study in Korea with systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Although several chemopreventive drugs against gastric cancer have been proposed, their effects have not been fully evaluated. We examined the impacts of aspirin, metformin, and statin use on gastric cancer development in a population-based cohort in Korea.

METHODS

We analyzed the association between potential chemopreventive drugs-aspirin, metformin, and statin-and gastric cancer through the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model-based Korean nationwide cohort. Use of aspirin, metformin, and statin was defined by ≥365 days of prescriptions for each drug in the general population. To summarize the current evidence, we further performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of aspirin, metformin, and statin on gastric cancer development.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 31,839, 6764, and 10,251 subjects were observed for medians of 4.7, 4.2, and 4.2 years for aspirin, metformin, and statin analysis, respectively. Use of aspirin or statin was associated with lower risks of gastric cancer compared to their non-use, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval [CI]]: aspirin, 0.72 [0.60-0.85], p < 0.01; statin, 0.67 [0.49-0.92], p = 0.01). However, no association was observed between metformin use and gastric cancer development (HR [95% CI]: 0.85 [0.59-1.23], p = 0.40). A subgroup of subjects with diabetes mellitus showed a lower risk of gastric cancer development with statin use. The meta-analysis showed the highest effect size of gastric cancer development for statin, followed by aspirin and metformin.

CONCLUSIONS

Statin and aspirin use were associated with significantly reduced risks of gastric cancer development, while the use of metformin was not associated with the gastric cancer risk. The protective effect of statin against gastric cancer was also significant in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Aspirin potentiates celecoxib-induced growth inhibition and apoptosis in human non-small cell lung cancer by targeting GRP78 activity

Background:

Aspirin has recently emerged as an anticancer drug, but its therapeutic effect on lung cancer has been rarely reported, and the mechanism of action is still unclear. Long-term use of celecoxib in large doses causes serious side effects, and it is necessary to explore better ways to achieve curative effects. In this study, we evaluated the synergistic anticancer effects of celecoxib and aspirin in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells.

Methods:

In vitro, we evaluated the combined effects of celecoxib (40 μM) and aspirin (8 mM) on cell apoptosis, cell cycle distribution, cell proliferation, cell migration and signaling pathways. Furthermore, the effect of aspirin (100 mg/kg body weight) and celecoxib (50 mg/kg body weight) on the growth of xenograft tumors was explored in vivo.

Results:

Our data suggest that cancer sensitivity to combined therapy using low concentrations of celecoxib and aspirin was higher than that of celecoxib or aspirin alone. Further research showed that the anti-tumor effect of celecoxib combined with aspirin was mainly produced by activating caspase-9/caspase-3, arresting cell cycle and inhibiting the ERK-MAPK signaling pathway. In addition, celecoxib alone or in combination with aspirin inhibited the migration and invasion of NSCLC cells by inhibiting MMP-9 and MMP-2 activity levels. Moreover, we identified GRP78 as a target protein of aspirin in NSCLC cells. Aspirin induced an endoplasmic reticulum stress response by inhibiting GRP78 activity. Furthermore, combination therapy also exhibited a better inhibitory effect on tumor growth in vivo.

Conclusions:

Our study provides a rationale for further detailed preclinical and potential clinical studies of the combination of celecoxib and aspirin for NSCLC therapy.

Aspirin associated with a decreased incidence of uterine cancer: A retrospective population-based cohort study

Aspirin (ASA) exerts an anti-tumor effect via the COX pathway. Clinical studies on the chemopreventive effects of ASA on uterine cancer (UC) remain inconsistent. We used population-based retrospective cohort study to evaluate the UC in ASA users in Taiwanese women. From insurance claims data, we identified 23,342 women received ASA treatment between 2000 and 2010 and a comparison group of same sample size randomly selected from the same database matched by the propensity score. The incidence of UC in the ASA cohort was 10% of that in the comparison group (0.28 vs 2.73 per 10,000 person-years). The Poisson regression analysis estimated adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) was 0.10 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.09-0.11) for ASA users relatives to comparisons after controlling for covariates. The UC incidence in ASA users decreased with age, from 0.61 per 10,000 person-years in the 20 to 39 years old (adjusted IRR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.15-0.29) to 0.21 per 10,000 person-years in the 65 to 80 years old (adjusted IRR = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.12-0.16). The incidence was higher in longer term users. Hormone therapy of estradiol was associated with the increase of UC risk in both cohorts, but less in ASA users than comparisons (1.34 vs 4.75 per 10,000 person-years). This study suggests that ASA use was associated with a decreased risk of UC. Further prospective randomized clinical trials are warranted to confirm the association.

Effect of aspirin use on neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have reported the preventive and protective effects of aspirin in patients with rectal cancer. However, it is not clear whether aspirin can be used as an assistance drug in preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Therefore, this study will explore the efficacy of aspirin as an adjuvant agent in rectal cancer neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using the electronic platforms to obtain relevant research studies published up to Jan 2020. The search was limited to papers published in English or Chinese language. Confidence intervals of research endpoints in each study were extracted and merged. The meta-analysis was performed using Stata12.0 software. Furthermore, we performed trial sequential analysis (TSA) to evaluate the robustness of our findings and to obtain a more conservative estimation.

RESULTS

A total of 5 studies including 977 patients were identified to be eligible for this meta-analysis. Compared with control group, aspirin group significantly increased pathologic complete response rate from 16.5 to 22.3% (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.01-1.96, P = 0.041), partial remission rate from 21.8 to 45.7% (RR 1.87, 95% CI 1.37-2.54, P < 0.001), and tumor down-staging rate from 44.4 to 63.8% (RR 1.43, 95% CI 1.17-1.75, P = 0.001). Moreover, aspirin group can reduce local recurrence rate (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.17-0.84, P = 0.017), improve 3-year survival rate (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.12-1.36, P < 0.001), and 5-year survival rate (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.14-1.46, P < 0.001). TSA shows that the meta-analysis results of pathologic complete response rate and local recurrence rate may be a false positive. Furthermore, the meta-analysis results of other study endpoints were further confirmed by TSA.

CONCLUSION

Aspirin, as an adjuvant agent, can enhance the effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and improve the prognosis of patients with rectal cancer. Neoadjuvant therapy combined with aspirin may be considered a better option for preoperative rectal cancer patients.

What Can We Learn About Drug Safety and Other Effects in the Era of Electronic Health Records and Big Data That We Would Not Be Able to Learn From Classic Epidemiology?

As more and more health systems have converted to the use of electronic health records, the amount of searchable and analyzable data is exploding. This includes not just provider or laboratory created data but also data collected by instruments, personal devices, and patients themselves, among others. This has led to more attention being paid to the analysis of these data to answer previously unaddressed questions. This is especially important given the number of therapies previously found to be beneficial in clinical trials that are currently being re-scrutinized. Because there are orders of magnitude more information contained in these data sets, a fundamentally different approach needs to be taken to their processing and analysis and the generation of knowledge. Health care and medicine are drivers of this phenomenon and will ultimately be the main beneficiaries. Concurrently, many different types of questions can now be asked using these data sets. Research groups have become increasingly active in mining large data sets, including nationwide health care databases, to learn about associations of medication use and various unrelated diseases such as cancer. Given the recent increase in research activity in this area, its promise to radically change clinical research, and the relative lack of widespread knowledge about its potential and advances, we surveyed the available literature to understand the strengths and limitations of these new tools. We also outline new databases and techniques that are available to researchers worldwide, with special focus on work pertaining to the broad and rapid monitoring of drug safety and secondary effects.

Effect of aspirin use on gastric cancer incidence and survival: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and Aim

A number of recent studies have been published evaluating the chemopreventive effect of aspirin against gastric cancer, and an updated meta‐analysis is required to evaluate this relationship further. This study presents a meta‐analysis of studies examining the effect of aspirin on gastric cancer incidence and death.

Methods

The PUBMED and Cochrane Central Registration of Controlled Trials databases were searched for eligible studies published up to December 2018. Pooled risk ratios for gastric cancer incidence and death in aspirin users versus nonusers were determined using fixed‐ and random‐effects models. The influence of the frequency of aspirin use, duration of aspirin use, and geographic location on gastric cancer incidence was evaluated.

Results

The meta‐analysis comprised 33 studies with a total of 1 927 971 patients. The pooled risk ratios for gastric cancer incidence in the fixed‐ and random‐effects models were 0.890 (95% confidence interval, 0.871–0.909) and 0.826 (0.740–0.922), respectively. In Asia and North America, the maximum preventive benefit of aspirin use was observed with weekly or daily use. Aspirin use was most effective for noncardiac gastric cancer. The pooled risk ratios for gastric cancer death in the fixed‐ and random‐effects models were 0.798 (0.749–0.850) and 0.894 (0.780–1.024), respectively. Significant heterogeneity was observed among studies of gastric cancer incidence but not gastric cancer death.

Conclusion

Aspirin use may reduce the risk of gastric cancer incidence and death; however, the relationship may be limited to a specific frequency and duration of aspirin use and geographic location.

Complex roles of the old drug aspirin in cancer chemoprevention and therapy

The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent aspirin is widely used for preventing and treating cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. In addition, epidemiologic evidences reveal that aspirin may prevent a variety of human cancers, while data on the association between aspirin and some kinds of cancer are conflicting. Preclinical studies and clinical trials also reveal the therapeutic effect of aspirin on cancer. Although cyclooxygenase is a well-known target of aspirin, recent studies uncover other targets of aspirin and its metabolites, such as AMP-activated protein kinase, cyclin-dependent kinase, heparanase, and histone. Accumulating evidence demonstrate that aspirin may act in different cell types, such as epithelial cell, tumor cell, endothelial cell, platelet, and immune cell. Therefore, aspirin acts on diverse hallmarks of cancer, such as sustained tumor growth, metastasis, angiogenesis, inflammation, and immune evasion. In this review, we focus on recent progress in the use of aspirin for cancer chemoprevention and therapy, and integratively analyze the mechanisms underlying the anticancer effects of aspirin and its metabolites. We also discuss mechanisms of aspirin resistance and describe some derivatives of aspirin, which aim to overcome the adverse effects of aspirin.

Associations between aspirin use and the risk of cancers: a meta-analysis of observational studies

Background

Epidemiological studies have clarified the potential associations between regular aspirin use and cancers. However, it remains controversial on whether aspirin use decreases the risk of cancers risks. Therefore, we conducted an updated meta-analysis to assess the associations between aspirin use and cancers.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched up to March 2017 to identify relevant studies. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of associations.

Results

A total of 218 studies with 309 reports were eligible for this meta-analysis. Aspirin use was associated with a significant decrease in the risk of overall cancer (RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.87–0.91), and gastric (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.65–0.86), esophageal (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.62–0.89), colorectal (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.74–0.85), pancreatic (RR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.68–0.93), ovarian (RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.83–0.95), endometrial (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85–0.99), breast (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.88–0.96), and prostate (RR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90–0.99) cancers, as well as small intestine neuroendocrine tumors (RR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.05–0.58).

Conclusions

These findings suggest that aspirin use is associated with a reduced risk of gastric, esophageal, colorectal, pancreatic, ovarian, endometrial, breast, and prostate cancers, and small intestine neuroendocrine tumors.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4156-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.