Durvalumab and tremelimumab with or without stereotactic body radiation therapy in relapsed small cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II study

Radiotherapy and immunology

The majority of cancer patients receive radiotherapy during the course of treatment, delivered with curative intent for local tumor control or as part of a multimodality regimen aimed at eliminating distant metastasis. A major focus of research has been DNA damage; however, in the past two decades, emphasis has shifted to the important role the immune system plays in radiotherapy-induced anti-tumor effects. Radiotherapy reprograms the tumor microenvironment, triggering DNA and RNA sensing cascades that activate innate immunity and ultimately enhance adaptive immunity. In opposition, radiotherapy also induces suppression of anti-tumor immunity, including recruitment of regulatory T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and suppressive macrophages. The balance of pro- and anti-tumor immunity is regulated in part by radiotherapy-induced chemokines and cytokines. Microbiota can also influence radiotherapy outcomes and is under clinical investigation. Blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis and CTLA-4 has been extensively investigated in combination with radiotherapy; we include a review of clinical trials involving inhibition of these immune checkpoints and radiotherapy.

The dynamic duo: A narrative review on the synergy between stereotactic body radiotherapy and immunotherapy in lung cancer treatment (Review)

Immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), is undoubtedly one of the major breakthroughs in lung cancer research. Patient survival and prognosis have all been improved as a result, although numerous patients do not respond to immunotherapy due to various immune escape mechanisms of the tumor cells. Recent preclinical and clinical evidence has shown that stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), also known as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy, has a prominent immune priming effect that could elicit antitumor immunity against specific tumor antigens and destroy distant tumor cells, thereby achieving the elusive abscopal effect, with the resulting immuno‑active tumor environment also being more conducive to ICIs. Some landmark trials have already demonstrated the survival benefit of the dynamic duo of SBRT plus immunotherapy in metastatic non‑small‑cell lung cancer, while others such as PEMBRO‑RT further suggest that the addition of SBRT to immunotherapy could expand the current indication to those who have historically responded poorly to ICIs. In the present review, the biological mechanisms that drive the synergistic effect of SBRT and immunotherapy were first briefly outlined; then, the current understanding from clinical trials was summarized and new insight into the evolving role of immunotherapy and SBRT synergy in lung cancer treatment was provided. Finally, novel avenues for discovery were highlighted. The innovation of the present review lies in the inclusion of non‑ICI immunotherapy in the discussion, which provides a more comprehensive view on the current development and future trend of SBRT + immunotherapy synergy.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced cardiotoxicity in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of lung cancer may precipitate cardiotoxic events. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the cardiotoxicity associated with ICIs in patients with lung cancer.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted across four electronic databases (Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, OVID EMBASE and Google Scholar) from inception through 31st May 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the impact of ICIs on cardiac outcomes in lung cancer patients were considered for inclusion. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled and analysis was performed using a random-effects model. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was followed to assess confidence in the estimates of effect (i.e., the quality of evidence).

RESULTS

A total of 30 studies including 16,331 patients, were included in the analysis. Pooled results showed that single ICI (RR: 2.15; 95% CI: 1.13-4.12; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%) or a combination of single ICI plus chemotherapy (RR: 1.38 [1.05-1.82]; p = 0.02) significantly increased the risk of cardiac adverse events when compared with chemotherapy alone. No significant difference was noted when a dual ICI (RR: 0.48 [0.13-1.80]; p = 0.27) was compared with single ICI. In addition, there was no significant association between the use of ICIs and incidence of cardiac failure (RR: 1.11 [0.48-2.58]; p = 0.80), or arrhythmia (RR: 1.87; [0.69-5.08]; p = 0.22).

CONCLUSION

Compared with chemotherapy alone, use of a single ICI or a combination of single ICI plus chemotherapy significantly increased the risk of cardiotoxicity. However, employing dual immunotherapy did not result in a significant increase in the risk of cardiotoxicity when compared to the use of a single ICI.

Beyond success: unveiling the hidden potential of radiotherapy and immunotherapy in solid tumors

Immunotherapy, particularly with immune checkpoint inhibitors, has significantly transformed cancer treatment. Despite its success, many patients struggle to respond adequately or sustain long-lasting clinical improvement. A growing consensus has emerged that radiotherapy (RT) enhances the response rate and overall efficacy of immunotherapy. Although combining RT and immunotherapy has been extensively investigated in preclinical models and has shown promising results, establishing itself as a dynamic and thriving area of research, clinical evidence for this combination strategy over the past five years has shown both positive and disappointing results, suggesting the need for a more nuanced understanding. This review provides a balanced and updated analysis of the combination of immunotherapy and RT. We summarized the preclinical mechanisms through which RT boosts antitumor immune responses and mainly focused on the outcomes of recently updated clinical trials, including those that may not have met expectations. We investigated the optimization of the therapeutic potential of this combined strategy, including key challenges, such as fractionation and scheduling, lymph node irradiation, and toxicity. Finally, we offered insights into the prospects and challenges associated with the clinical translation of this combination therapy, providing a realistic perspective on the current state of research and potential future directions.

The Evolving Scenario of ES-SCLC Management: From Biology to New Cancer Therapeutics

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine carcinoma accounting for 15% of lung cancers with dismal survival outcomes. Minimal changes in therapy and prognosis have occurred in SCLC for the past four decades. Recent progress in the treatment of extensive-stage disease (ES-SCLC) has been marked by incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into platinum-based chemotherapy, leading to modest improvements. Moreover, few second-line-and-beyond treatment options are currently available. The main limitation for the molecular study of SCLC has been the scarcity of samples, because only very early diseases are treated with surgery and biopsies are not performed when the disease progresses. Despite all these difficulties, in recent years we have come to understand that SCLC is not a homogeneous disease. At the molecular level, in addition to the universal loss of retinoblastoma (RB) and TP53 genes, a recent large molecular study has identified other mutations that could serve as targets for therapy development or patient selection. In recent years, there has also been the identification of new genetic subtypes which have shown us how intertumor heterogeneity exists. Moreover, SCLC can also develop intratumoral heterogeneity linked mainly to the concept of cellular plasticity, mostly due to the development of resistance to therapies. The aim of this review is to quickly present the current standard of care of ES-SCLC, to focus on the molecular landscapes and subtypes of SCLC, subsequently present the most promising therapeutic strategies under investigation, and finally recap the future directions of ongoing clinical trials for this aggressive disease which still remains a challenge.

Redefining the battle against colorectal cancer: a comprehensive review of emerging immunotherapies and their clinical efficacy

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer globally and presents a significant challenge owing to its high mortality rate and the limitations of traditional treatment options such as surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. While these treatments are foundational, they are often poorly effective owing to tumor resistance. Immunotherapy is a groundbreaking alternative that has recently emerged and offers new hope for success by exploiting the body's own immune system. This article aims to provide an extensive review of clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of various immunotherapies, including CRC vaccines, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. We also discuss combining CRC vaccines with monoclonal antibodies, delve into preclinical studies of novel cancer vaccines, and assess the impact of these treatment methods on patient outcomes. This review seeks to provide a deeper understanding of the current state of CRC treatment by evaluating innovative treatments and their potential to redefine the prognosis of patients with CRC.

Benefits and risks of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for recurrent small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs) has revolutionized the progress of solid tumors. Ongoing clinical trials are exploring the use of checkpoint inhibitors in recurrent small-cell lung cancer and achieving specific results. Although studies have been conducted to systematically review this issue, we conducted this single-arm meta-analysis in light of the emergence of several new clinical studies. In total, 854 individuals from 11 clinical investigations were enrolled in this single-arm meta-analysis. Median progression-free survival, median overall survival, and objective response rate were 1.65 months, 6.83 months, and 20.5%, respectively, according to pooled analyses. The best treatment regimen in the subgroup analysis was a dual checkpoint inhibitor combined with other treatments, and the drug that worked well for treatment was pembrolizumab. The benefit of programmed death 1/programmed cell death-ligand 1(PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors alone is limited, and their combination with other therapies is a promising treatment option. Among PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, pembrolizumab is the recommended drug.

The role of thoracic consolidative radiotherapy in the setting of immunotherapy in extensive stage small cell lung cancer

The improvement in treatment strategies and outcomes in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has lagged behind other cancers. The addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), durvalumab and atezolizumab, to the platinum-based chemotherapy in frontline setting has improved the survival in extensive stage SCLC, (ES-SCLC), albeit modestly, and is now the new standard of care. Prior to advent of immunotherapy into the therapeutic armamentarium in ES-SCLC, consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) was associated with improved thoracic control and survival outcomes. In the era of ICIs, the role of TRT is not well defined, chiefly because TRT was not incorporated in any immunotherapy trials, secondly due to concerns regarding the increased risks of pneumonitis, and finally uncertain magnitude of benefit with this combined approach. In principle, radiation can increase in the immunogenicity of tumor and hence the activity of immune checkpoint blockade, thereby increasing efficacy both locally and distantly. Such an approach has been promising in non-small cell lung cancer with ICIs improving outcomes after concurrent chemoradiation, but remains unanswered in ES-SCLC. It is, thus, possible that the modest improvement in survival by addition of ICIs to chemotherapy in ES-SCLC can be further improved by the incorporation of consolidative TRT in selected patients. Several early phase trials and retrospective studies have suggested that such an approach may be feasible and safe. Prospective trials are ongoing to answer whether adding radiation therapy to chemoimmunotherapy will improve outcomes in ES-SCLC.

Advances in Radiotherapy Immune Modulation: From Bench-to-Bedside and Back Again

Pre-clinical and clinical data clearly demonstrate the immune modulatory effects of radiotherapy (RT) but clinical trials testing RT + immunotherapy have been equivocal. An improved understanding of the immune modulatory effects of RT and how practical parameters of RT delivery (site and number of lesions, dose, fractionation, timing) influence these effects are needed to optimally combine RT with immunotherapy. Additionally, increased exploration of immunotherapy combinations with RT, beyond immune checkpoint inhibitors, are needed. A "bench-to-bedside and back again" approach will improve our understanding of RT immune modulation and allow for the implementation of more effective RT + immunotherapy strategies.

Radiotherapy Dose in Patients Receiving Immunotherapy

There is significant rationale for combining radiation therapy (RT) and immuno-oncology (IO) agents, but the optimal radiation parameters are unknown. This review summarizes key trials in the RT and IO space with a focus on RT dose. Very low RT doses solely modulate the tumor immune microenvironment, intermediate doses both modulate the tumor immune microenvironment and kill some fraction of tumor cells, and ablative doses eliminate the majority of target tumor cells and also possess immunomodulatory effects. Ablative RT doses may have high toxicity if targets are adjacent to radiosensitive normal organs. The majority of completed trials have been conducted in the setting of metastatic disease and direct RT to a single lesion with the goal of generating systemic antitumor immunity termed the abscopal effect. Unfortunately, reliable generation of an abscopal effect has proved elusive over a range of radiation doses. Newer trials are exploring the effects of delivering RT to all or most sites of metastatic disease, with dose personalization based on the number and location of lesions. Additional directions include testing RT and IO in earlier stages of disease, sometimes in further combination with chemotherapy and surgery, where lower doses of RT may still contribute substantially to pathologic responses.

Tackling the current dilemma of immunotherapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A promising strategy of combining with radiotherapy

Progress in the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has been modest over the past decades until the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors, which have redefined the standard first-line treatment for extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). However, despite the positive results of several clinical trials, the limited survival benefit achieved suggests that the priming and sustaining of immunotherapeutic efficacy are poor and further investigation is urgently needed. In this review, we aim to summarize the potential mechanisms underlying the limited efficacy of immunotherapy and intrinsic resistance in ES-SCLC, including impaired antigen presentation and limited T cell infiltration. Moreover, to tackle the current dilemma, given the synergistic effects of radiotherapy on immunotherapy, especially the unique advantages of low-dose radiotherapy (LDRT), such as less immunosuppression and lower radiation toxicity, we propose radiotherapy as a booster to enhance the immunotherapeutic efficacy by overcoming the poor priming effect. Recent clinical trials, including ours, have also focused on adding radiotherapy, including LDRT, to first-line treatment of ES-SCLC. Additionally, we also suggest combination strategies to sustain the immunostimulatory effect of radiotherapy, as well as the cancer-immunity cycle, and further improve survival outcomes.

Gastrointestinal treatment-related adverse events of combined immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis

Introduction: Combined immune checkpoint inhibitors can cause gastrointestinal adverse events. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of pooled colonic, hepatic and pancreatic treatment-related adverse events of combined ICI. Results: 53 trials reporting treatment-related adverse events in 6581 patients. All grade diarrhea was the most common adverse event seen in 25.4% patients, followed by all grade hepatitis in nearly 13% patients and pancreatitis in nearly 7.5% patients. Conclusion: Our study provides pooled data of treatment-related adverse events from different combination immune checkpoint inhibitors use in solid tumors and demonstrates a high incidence of all grades and ≥3 grade gastrointestinal adverse events. Further studies are required to characterize these adverse events and assess their overall impact on treatment course and outcomes.

Relationship between the tumor microenvironment and the efficacy of the combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy

Activating and recruiting the immune system is critical for successful cancer treatment. Since the discovery of immune checkpoint inhibitors, immunotherapy has become the standard of care for many types of cancers. However, many patients fail to respond to immunotherapy. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms of resistance and adjuvant therapies that can help sensitize patients to immunotherapies. Here, we will discuss how radiotherapy can change the tumor microenvironment and work synergistically with immunotherapy. We will examine different pre-clinical models focusing on their limitations and their unique advantages in studying the efficacy of treatments and the tumor microenvironment. We will also describe emerging findings from clinical trials testing the combination of immunotherapy and radiotherapy.

Progress in the clinical application of immune checkpoint inhibitors in small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a refractory cancer with poor prognosis due to its aggressive malignancy and high rates of metastasis, recurrence and drug resistance. These characteristics have also greatly impeded the identification of new treatment methods and drugs. The traditional model of SCLC treatment that has been reliant on platinum combined with etoposide for decades has been superseded by the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which have shown significant therapeutic effects and broad application prospects as a monotherapy. This has led to the evaluation of ICIs with different mechanisms of action and their use in combination with radiotherapy or a variety of molecular targeted drugs to achieve synergy, complementary advantages, and reduce adverse reactions. Here, we review the progress in the use of ICIs as a monotherapy or in combination therapy for SCLC and consider the current limitations of these approaches as well as prospects for future developments.

Current and Emerging Treatment Options for Patients With Relapsed Small-cell Lung Carcinoma: A Systematic Literature Review

Second-line treatment options are limited for patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). We conducted a PRISMA-standard systematic literature review to evaluate the treatment landscape for patients with relapsed SCLC (PROSPERO number: CRD42022299759). Systematic searches of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were performed (October 2022) to identify publications (prior 5 years) from prospective studies of therapies for relapsed SCLC. Publications were screened against predetermined eligibility criteria; data were extracted to standardized fields. Publication quality was assessed using GRADE. The data were analyzed descriptively, grouped by drug class. Overall, 77 publications involving 6349 patients were included. Studies of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with established cancer indications accounted for 24 publications; topoisomerase I inhibitors for 15; checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) for 11, and alkylating agents for 9 publications. The remaining 18 publications featured chemotherapies, small-molecule inhibitors, investigational TKIs and monoclonal antibodies, and a cancer vaccine. According to GRADE assessment, 69% of the publications reported low-/very-low-quality evidence; quality limitations included lack of randomization and small sample sizes. Only 6 publications/6 trials reported phase 3 data; 5 publications/2 trials reported phase 2/3 results. Overall, the clinical potential of alkylating agents and CPIs remained unclear; investigations of combination approaches and biomarker-directed usage are warranted. Phase 2 data from TKI trials were consistently promising; no phase 3 data were available. Phase 2 data for a liposomal formulation of irinotecan were promising. We confirmed an absence of promising investigational drug/regimens in late-stage development; thus, relapsed SCLC remains an area of high unmet need.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without radiotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and purpose: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), their efficacy is limited. Meanwhile, recent reports suggest that radiotherapy (RT) can activate the systemic antitumor immune response by increasing the release of antigens from tumor tissues. Therefore, in patients with mNSCLC treated with ICIs, investigations were performed to determine whether the addition of RT improved the outcomes. Furthermore, the adverse events rate was evaluated. Methods and materials: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched using the keywords "radiotherapy," "immune checkpoint inhibitors," and "non-small cell lung cancer" from the date of inception to 2 May 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonRCTs (NRCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of RT combined with ICIs versus ICIs alone in metastatic NSCLC were assessed. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were abscopal response rate (ARR), abscopal control rate (ACR), adverse events rate, and pneumonia rate. The analyses were conducted using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects or random-effects model. The I² statistic was used to determine heterogeneity, whereas funnel plots and Egger's test were used to assess publication bias. Results: In 15 clinical studies, 713 patients received RT combined with ICIs and 1,275 patients received only ICIs. With regard to PFS and OS, the hazard ratios of RT combined with ICIs were 0.79 (0.70, 0.89) and 0.72 (0.63, 0.82), respectively. In terms of ARR and ACR, the odds ratios (ORs) of RT combined with ICIs were 1.94 (1.19, 3.17) and 1.79 (1.08, 2.97), respectively. Subgroup analyses based on study type (RCT/NRCT), RT target (intracranial/extracranial), number of RT sites (single site), previous ICI resistance (yes/no), and sequencing of RT and ICIs (concurrent/post-RT ICIs) revealed that the addition of RT significantly prolonged PFS and OS. However, subgroup analyses based on radiation dose/fractionation indicated that the addition of hypofractionated RT significantly prolonged OS but not PFS. When grouped according to the level of PD-L1 expression, the addition of RT prolonged PFS only in patients who were PD-L1-negative. Furthermore, subgroup analyses of ARR and ACR signified that the combination therapy resulted in better local control of lesions outside the irradiation field in the hypofractionated RT, extracranial RT, and ICI-naïve subgroups. In terms of adverse events, the addition of RT did not significantly increase the adverse events rate but was associated with a higher pneumonia rate [OR values were 1.24 (0.92, 1.67) and 1.76 (1.12, 2.77), respectively]. Conclusion: Meta-analysis of existing data suggests that the addition of RT can significantly prolong PFS and OS in patients with metastatic NSCLC receiving ICIs. In addition to lesions in the irradiation field, RT can improve the local control rate of lesions outside the irradiation field via immune activation. Combination therapy does not increase the overall risk of adverse reactions, except for pneumonia.

Global research landscape and trends of lung cancer immunotherapy: A bibliometric analysis

​Background

Immunotherapy for lung cancer has been a hot research area for years. This bibliometric analysis aims to present the research trends on lung cancer immunotherapy.

Method

On 1 July, 2022, the authors identified 2,941 papers on lung cancer immunotherapy by the Web of Science and extracted their general information and the total number of citations. A bibliometric analysis was carried out to present the research landscape, demonstrate the research trends, and determine the most cited papers (top papers) as well as major journals on lung cancer immunotherapy. After that, recent research hotspots were analyzed based on the latest publications in major journals.

Results

These 2,941 papers were cited a total of 122,467 times. "Nivolumab vs. docetaxel in advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer" published in 2015 by Borghaei H et al. was the most cited paper (5,854 citations). Among the journals, New England Journal of Medicine was most influential. Corresponding authors represented China took part in most articles (904) and papers with corresponding authors from the USA were most cited (139.46 citations per paper). Since 2015, anti-PD-(L)1 has become the hottest research area.

Conclusions

This bibliometric analysis comprehensively and quantitatively presents the research trends and hotspots based on thousands of publications, and further suggests future research directions. Moreover, the results can benefit researchers to select journals and find potential collaborators. This study can help researchers get a comprehensive impression of the research landscape, historical development, and recent hotspots in lung cancer immunotherapy and provide inspiration for further research.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced pancreatic cancer: A real world study in Chinese cohort

Previous clinical studies had not shown expected results in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) with single-agent checkpoint inhibitors. Until the present day, little is known about their performance in real-world settings. So, in this study, we investigate the ICIs' efficacy and safety in Chinese APC patients. Patients with APC who received ICIs between November 2018 to June 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The efficacy end points included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and adverse events (AEs). This study included 104 patients and the median OS (mOS) and median PFS (mPFS) were 9.1 and 5.4 months, respectively. In the subgroup analyses, the mOS was longer for patients receiving combined radiotherapy than for those that didn't (13.8 vs 7.0 months, p < .001), whereas the mPFS was also longer, and the ORR and DCR were higher. Specifically, the mOS was longer for patients who had received a combination of chemotherapy than for those combined with targeted therapy (11.6 vs 5.6 months, p = .002), with the mPFS being also longer. ICIs as a first-line treatment could resulted to better survival. The mOS was longer for patients with a high TMB compared to those with low (19.3 vs 7.2 months, p = .004), whereas AEs were considered to be tolerable. The combination therapy of ICIs was proved to be safe and effective for treating APC, especially the combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, which would benefit from additional prospective studies.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse cardiac events in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Although people are more and more aware of the cardiotoxicity caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of lung cancer, its incidence rate has not been systematically analyzed. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of cardiotoxicity related to the ICI therapies for lung cancer, so as to enhance clinicians' attention to cardiotoxicity, implement proper prevention and intervention for high-risk patients, and minimize the risk of cardiac dysfunction during and after completion of therapy.

Methods

We conducted a systematic literature search for relevant publications in PubMed and Scopus from inception to 19 April 2022. Pooled incidence and risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for cardiotoxicity events were calculated.

Results

A total of 37 studies covering 38 trials, including 14,342 patients, were identified. The pooled risk ratios of incidence of any cardiac AEs were 1.944 [95% CI 0.8–4.725] (Single ICI versus chemotherapy), 1.677 [95% CI 1.065–2.64] (Single ICI plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy), and 0.478 [95% CI 0.127–1.798] (Single ICI versus Dual ICI). The incidence of myocarditis and arrhythmia were 0.003[95%CI 0.002–0.006] and 0.014[95%CI 0–0.037], respectively.

Conclusion

Single ICI did not increase the risk of cardiotoxicity compared with chemotherapy, and single ICI plus chemotherapy increased the risk of cardiotoxicity by 67% compared with chemotherapy alone. Combination immunotherapy did not increase the risk of cardiotoxicity compared with single ICI.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12935-022-02760-2.

Research landscape and trends of lung cancer radiotherapy: A bibliometric analysis

Background

radiotherapy is one of the major treatments for lung cancer and has been a hot research area for years. This bibliometric analysis aims to present the research trends on lung cancer radiotherapy.

Method

On August 31, 2022, the authors identified 9868 articles on lung cancer radiotherapy by the Web of Science (Science Citation Indexing Expanded database) and extracted their general information and the total number of citations. A bibliometric analysis was carried out to present the research landscape, demonstrate the research trends, and determine the most cited papers (top-papers) as well as top-journals on lung cancer radiotherapy. After that, the authors analyzed the recent research hotspots based on the latest publications in top-journals.

Results

These 9868 papers were cited a total of 268,068 times. “Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III non–small-cell lung cancer” published in 2017 by Antonia et al.was the most cited article (2110 citations). Among the journals, New England Journal of Medicine was most influential. Moreover, J. Clin. Oncol. and Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. was both influential and productive. Corresponding authors represented the USA (2610 articles) and China mainland (2060 articles) took part in most publications and articles with corresponding authors from Netherlands were most cited (46.12 citations per paper). Chemoradiotherapy was the hottest research area, and stereotactic body radiotherapy has become a research hotspot since 2006. Radiotherapy plus immunotherapy has been highly focused since 2019.

Conclusions

This bibliometric analysis comprehensively and quantitatively presents the research trends and hotspots based on 9868 relevant articles, and further suggests future research directions. The researchers can benefit in selecting journals and in finding potential collaborators. This study can help researchers gain a comprehensive picture of the research landscape, historical development, and recent hotspots in lung cancer radiotherapy and can provide inspiration for future research.

Dissecting Immunotherapy Strategies for Small Cell Lung Cancer: Antibodies, Ionizing Radiation and CAR-T

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive malignancy that accounts for about 14% of all lung cancers. Platinum-based chemotherapy has been the only available treatment for a long time, until the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) recently changed first-line standard of care and shed light on the pivotal role of the immune system. Despite improved survival in a subset of patients, a lot of them still do not benefit from first-line chemo-immunotherapy, and several studies are investigating whether different combination strategies (with both systemic and local treatments, such as radiotherapy) may improve patient outcomes. Moreover, research of biomarkers that may be used to predict patients' outcomes is ongoing. In addition to ICIs, immunotherapy offers other different strategies, including naked monoclonal antibodies targeting tumor associated antigens, conjugated antibody, bispecific antibodies and cellular therapies. In this review, we summarize the main evidence available about the use of immunotherapy in SCLC, the rationale behind combination strategies and the studies that are currently ongoing in this setting, in order to give the reader a clear and complete view of this rapidly expanding topic.

Immunotherapy Alone or in Combination with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Advanced Lung Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Background

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of advanced lung cancer. Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether adding stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to immunotherapy (IT) further improves responses and survival outcomes. Therefore, in this pooled analysis, we comprehensively compared IT plus SBRT with IT alone in patients with advanced lung cancer.

Methods

Online databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL, were systematically searched on April 24, 2022. Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials comparing IT plus SBRT to IT. The primary outcomes were the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were explored as secondary outcomes.

Results

Overall, three phase 2 randomized clinical trials with a total of 146 previously treated lung cancer patients were enrolled. The median PFS and OS were 3.8 months and 9.5 months for IT plus SBRT versus 2.4 months and 6.1 months for IT. Comparing IT plus SBRT with IT alone, pooled risk ratios for ORR and DCR were 1.95 (95% confidence interval 1.07–3.53, p = 0.03) and 1.28 (0.94–1.73, p = 0.12). While pooled hazard ratios were 0.77 (0.25–2.42, p = 0.66) for PFS and 0.71 (0.16–3.21, p = 0.65) for OS, respectively. No publication bias was found across the trials.

Conclusion

Compared to IT alone, the addition of SBRT improved the best response but failed to prolong the survival outcomes in treating advanced lung cancer patients. Future studies are necessary to explore new modalities of the combination of IT and SBRT.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Chemoradiation for Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) is a potentially curable disease. However, most patients develop disease relapse shortly after definitive treatment. The landmark trials IMpower133 and CASPIAN demonstrated a survival benefit with the addition of immunotherapy to first-line platinum/etoposide for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. Therefore, it is critical to determine whether advancements in overall survival with immunotherapy can be translated earlier into the treatment paradigm for LS-SCLC. Decades of robust preclinical research into the synergism of radiation therapy and immunotherapy set the stage for the combination of these treatment modalities. Recently published data suggests tolerability of single agent immunotherapy concurrent with chemoradiation in LS-SCLC, along with promising efficacy. However, combination immunotherapy in the consolidation setting appears too toxic, although this may be reflective of the dosing schedule rather than inherent to any combination immune checkpoint blockade. Here, we review underlying mechanisms of synergy with the combination of radiation and immunotherapy, the safety and efficacy of respective treatment modalities, and the ongoing trials that are exploring novel therapeutic approaches for LS-SCLC. Pivotal trials in LS-SCLC are ongoing and anticipated to aid in understanding efficacy and safety of immunotherapy with concurrent platinum-based chemoradiotherapy.

[Clinical Progress in the Immunotherapy of Small Cell Lung Cancer]

Small cell lung cancer is a kind of malignant tumor with strong invasiveness and poor prognosis, and the classic therapeutic modality of the disease remains multidisciplinary and comprehensive treatment. Treatment options for small cell lung cancer have been stalled for a long time, and new opportunities have emerged in recent years due to the development and initial experience of immunotherapeutic drugs. Clinical trials of some selected immune checkpoint inhibitors have confirmed the efficacy and safety in small cell lung cancer. Based on the results of phase III clinical trials (Impower133 and CASPIAN), Atezolizumab or Durvalumab in combination with chemotherapy has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. Clinical trials involving immune checkpoint inhibitors are being actively carried out and provide different perspectives for the management of small cell lung cancer. This article aimed to review the clinical progress in immunotherapy of small cell lung cancer.
.

The Combined Clinical Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Adoptive Immunotherapy with Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To explore the differential efficacy of chemoradiotherapy combined with adoptive immunotherapy and radiochemotherapy alone in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Qualified randomized controlled trial (randomized controlled trial, RCT), or nonrandomized concurrent controlled trial (NRCCT), published in various databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Chinese journal full-text database, Medline, Cochrane database, and VIP Chinese database, and the Revman5. 0 software performed the data analysis.

Results

We found the significantly different curative effect between the experimental and control groups (OR = 1.94, 95% CI (1.46, 2.58), P < 0.001, I 2 = 0%, Z = 4.59), effect of adoptive immunotherapy on the progression of disease (OR = 1.80, 95% CI (1.38, 2.35), P < 0.001, I 2 = 0%, Z = 4.33), adoptive immunotherapy on overall survival (OR = 2.19, 95% CI (1.60, 2.99), P < 0.001, I 2 = 0%, Z = 4.91), and adverse effects of adoptive immunotherapy (OR = 1.76, 95% CI (1.25, 2.48), P = 0.001, I 2 = 0%, Z = 3.26).

Conclusion

Adoptive immunotherapy combined with microradiotherapy can decrease the recurrence of NSCLC and improve patient survival, as well as early patients can be benefited more significantly from immunotherapy.

Clinical predictors of survival in patients with relapsed/refractory small-cell lung cancer treated with checkpoint inhibitors: a German multicentric real-world analysis

Objectives:

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a lung malignancy with high relapse rates and poor survival outcomes. Treatment-resistant disease relapse occurs frequently and effective salvage therapies are urgently needed.

Materials and Methods:

We aimed to define efficacy and safety of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in a heterogeneous population of relapsed and refractory SCLC patients in a large retrospective multicentric real-world cohort across German tertiary care centers.

Results:

A total of 111 patients from 11 treatment centers were included. Median age of all patients was 64 years, and 63% were male. Approximately one-third of all patients had poor performance status [Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) ⩾ 2], and 37% had known brain metastases. Patients were heavily pretreated with a median number of prior therapy lines of 2 (range, 1–8). Median follow-up of the entire cohort was 21.7 months. Nivolumab and Nivolumab/Ipilimumab were the most common regimens. Overall disease control rate was 27.2% in all patients and was numerically higher in CPI combination regimens compared with single-agent CPI (31.8% versus 23.8%; p = 0.16). Median overall survival (OS) was 5.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.7–9.9 months]. The 12- and 24-month survival rates were 31.8% and 12.7%, respectively. The 12-week death rate was 27.9%. Disease control and response rate were significantly lower in patients with liver metastases. Platinum sensitivity (to first-line treatment), metastatic burden, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) showed prognostic impact on survival in univariate analysis. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was a significant and independent predictor of survival in univariate (p = 0.01) and multivariate analyses [hazard ratio (HR), 2.1; 95% CI = 1.1–4.1; p = 0.03].

Conclusion:

CPI in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) SCLC is of limited value in an overall patient cohort; however, long-term survival, in particular with CPI combination strategies, is possible. Clinical characteristics allow a more differentiated subgroup selection, in particular patients with low NLR showed less benefit from CPI in R/R SCLC.

Radiation therapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in the era of immunotherapy

Unlike non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the progression of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is slow. Extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) is a serious threat to human health, with a 5-year survival rate of <7%. Chemotherapy has been the first-line treatment for the past 30 years. The anti-PD-L1 checkpoint blockades durvalumab and atezolizumab have greatly prolonged overall survival and have become the standard first-line therapy for ES-SCLC since the CASPIAN and IMpower133 trials. In the era of chemotherapy, radiation therapy (RT), including thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) and brain radiation therapy (BRT), has shown clinical effects in randomized and retrospective studies on ES-SCLC. RT-immunotherapy has shown exciting synergistic effects in NSCLC. For ES-SCLC, the clinical effects of combining TRT/BRT with immunotherapy have not yet been systematically explored. In this review, we found that studies on RT-immunotherapy in ES-SCLC are relatively few and limited to early phase studies focusing on toxicity. The efficacy and safety profiles of early phase studies encourage prospective clinical trials. In this review, we discuss the best population, optimum TRT dose, proper TRT time, and strategies for reducing radiation-induced neurotoxicity. Furthermore, we suggest that biomarkers and patient performance status should be fully assessed before RT-immunotherapy treatment. Prospective trials are needed to provide more evidence for RT-immunotherapy applications in ES-SCLC.

Tumor immunotherapies by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); the pros and cons

The main breakthrough in tumor immunotherapy was the discovery of immune checkpoint (IC) proteins, which act as a potent suppressor of the immune system by a myriad of mechanisms. After that, scientists focused on the immune checkpoint molecules mainly. Thereby, much effort was spent to progress novel strategies for suppressing these inhibitory axes, resulting in the evolution of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Then, ICIs have become a promising approach and shaped a paradigm shift in tumor immunotherapies. CTLA-4 plays an influential role in attenuation of the induction of naïve and memory T cells by engagement with its responding ligands like B7-1 (CD80) and B7-2 (CD86). Besides, PD-1 is predominantly implicated in adjusting T cell function in peripheral tissues through its interaction with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and PD-L2. Given their suppressive effects on anti-tumor immunity, it has firmly been documented that ICIs based therapies can be practical and rational therapeutic approaches to treat cancer patients. Nonetheless, tumor inherent or acquired resistance to ICI and some treatment-related toxicities restrict their application in the clinic. The current review will deliver a comprehensive overview of the ICI application to treat human tumors alone or in combination with other modalities to support more desired outcomes and lower toxicities in cancer patients. Video Abstract.

Induction chemoimmunotherapy followed by CD8+ immune cell-based patient selection for chemotherapy-free radioimmunotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

The first aim of the trial is to study feasibility of combined programmed death protein ligand 1/cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 inhibition concomitant to radiotherapy. In addition, efficacy of the entire treatment scheme consisting of induction chemoimmunotherapy followed by chemotherapy-free radioimmunotherapy (RIT) after intratumoral CD8 +immune cell-based patient selection will be analyzed.

METHODS

Patients with stage III-IVB head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were eligible for this multicenter phase II trial. Treatment consisted of a single cycle of cisplatin 30 mg/m² days 1-3, docetaxel 75 mg/m² day 1, durvalumab 1500 mg fix dose day 5 and tremelimumab 75 mg fix dose day 5. Patients with increased intratumoral CD8 +immune cell density or pathological complete response (pCR) in the rebiopsy entered RIT up to a total dose of 70 Gy. Patients received further three cycles of durvalumab/tremelimumab followed by eight cycles of durvalumab mono (every 4 weeks). The intended treatment for patients not meeting these criteria was standard radiochemotherapy outside the trial. Primary endpoint was a feasibility rate of patients entering RIT to receive treatment until at least cycle 6 of immunotherapy of ≥80%.

RESULTS

Between September 2018 and May 2020, 80 patients were enrolled (one excluded). Out of these, 23 patients had human papilloma virus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal cancer. Median follow-up was 17.2 months. After induction chemoimmunotherapy 41 patients had pCR and 31 had increased intratumoral CD8 +immune cells. Of 60 patients entering RIT (primary endpoint cohort), 10 experienced imiting toxic (mainly hepatitis) and four discontinued for other reasons, resulting in a feasibility rate of 82%. The RIT cohort (n=60) had a progression-free survival (PFS) rate at one and 2 years of 78% and 72%, respectively, and an overall survival rate at one and 2 years of 90% and 84%, respectively. Patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancers had greater benefit from RIT with a 2-year PFS rate of 94% compared with 64% for HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancers and other locations. In the entire study cohort (n=79) the 2-year PFS rate was 68% (91% for HPV-positive oropharynx vs 59% for others). Toxicity grade 3-4 mainly consisted of dysphagia (53%), leukopenia (52%) and infections (32%).

CONCLUSIONS

The trial met the primary endpoint feasibility of RIT. Induction chemo-immunotherapy followed by chemotherapy-free RIT after intratumoral CD8 +immune cell-based patient selection has promising PFS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03426657). The trial was conducted as investigator-sponsored trial (IST).

A Real-World Evaluation of Atezolizumab Plus Platinum-Etoposide Chemotherapy in Patients With Extensive-Stage SCLC in Canada

Introduction

The real-world data evaluating treatment outcomes of atezolizumab plus carboplatin-etoposide chemotherapy (atezolizumab) for extensive-stage SCLC (ESCLC) are lacking. Our objective was to evaluate real-world outcomes of ESCLC treated with atezolizumab.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of provincial patients with ESCLC who started first-line (1L) systemic treatment was conducted. We primarily evaluated the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes in association with atezolizumab compared with platinum-etoposide chemotherapy (chemotherapy) while adjusting for relevant demographic and clinical factors. Adverse events (AEs) during 1L were evaluated.

Results

A total of 67 patients were identified. Of the 34 patients who received atezolizumab, 24% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than or equal to 2, approximately 50% were more than or equal to 65 years, 21% received cisplatin-etoposide chemotherapy before atezolizumab, and 12% had thoracic radiation (tRT).

Within the atezolizumab versus chemotherapy group, the median PFS equals to 6.0 versus 4.3 months (p = 0.03) whereas OS = 12.8 versus 7.1 months (p = 0.01). Relative to chemotherapy, the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for PFS was 0.53 (0.28–1.02) and OS was 0.42 (0.20–0.88) with atezolizumab. tRT compared with no tRT receipt correlated with reduced death risk (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.33 [0.13–0.88]).

AE-related treatment withdrawal with atezolizumab was 32% and 15% with chemotherapy (p = 0.02). Within the tRT subgroup, 25% versus 20% in atezolizumab versus chemotherapy group, respectively, discontinued 1L owing to AE.

Conclusions

This is the first real-world study revealing comparable survival with that in the IMpower133 trial. Treatment discontinuation from AEs was higher with atezolizumab among Canadian patients with ESCLC. Our data suggest safe use of tRT and chemoimmunotherapy, but its efficacy for ESCLC warrants further study.

Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab in Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Cancer immunotherapy represents one of the most important innovations in modern medicine. Durvalumab is an anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PDL-1) agent which is currently under investigation in several studies in combination with the anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) drug tremelimumab. The aim of this review was to systematically identify and revise the current scientific literature investigating the combination of these two drugs in solid tumors.

METHODS

A digital search on the Medline (PubMed interface) and Scopus databases for articles published from inception to 26 February 2021 was performed. The terms used for the search were durvalumab AND tremelimumab. Trials reported in English involving adult patients with solid cancers treated with the combination durvalumab plus tremelimumab were retrieved; the references of the articles were cross-checked to identify missing papers.

RESULTS

The electronic search produced 267 results; after exclusion of duplicates, irrelevant articles, reviews, and papers not in English or missing data, 19 articles were included for revision. The total number of patients treated with the combination of durvalumab and tremelimumab in the studies retrieved was 2052.

CONCLUSION

The combination of durvalumab plus tremelimumab showed some oncological advantages in comparison with traditional chemotherapies in some subsets of tumors, but generally has not shown consistent advantages in comparison with the employment of durvalumab monotherapy. A number of the studies examined had intrinsic methodological limitations; therefore, future well-designed studies involving larger cohorts are warranted.

Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and macrophages in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Many studies have investigated the prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and tumor-infiltrating macrophages (TIMs) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but the results remain controversial. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic significance of TILs/TIMs in patients with NPC METHODS: The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021234078). PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched up to Dec 30, 2020. We reviewed studies that evaluated the relationship between TILs/TIMs and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), or progression-free survival (PFS) in NPC. For TILs, CD3, CD4, CD8, and FOXP3 were searched as T-cell markers, CD19 and CD20 as B-cell markers, and CD56 as a natural killer cell marker. For TIMs, CD68 and CD163 were searched as total and M2 macrophage markers, respectively.

RESULTS

In total, 19 studies with 3708 NPC were included in this meta-analysis. We found that high total numbers of TILs were significantly associated with favorable OS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-0.57 and PFS (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.38-0.62)]. In contrast, tumor infiltration by CD3+ T cells (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.39-0.76), CD4+ T cells (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.18-0.85), and CD8+ T cells (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34-0.93) correlated positively with OS. No significant relationship was found between survival and tumor infiltration by FOXP3+ T cells, CD68+ macrophages, or CD163+ macrophages.

CONCLUSION

Our findings revealed that tumor infiltration by CD3+ , CD4+ , and CD8+ T cells could be prognostic biomarkers in NPC.