Immune-mediated ototoxicity associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with melanoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related hearing loss: a systematic review and analysis of individual patient data

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are related to various immune-related adverse events (irAEs). However, the knowledge is limited with rare irAEs like hearing loss. Therefore, we evaluated the characteristics, presentation, and treatment of ICI-related hearing loss by reviewing the individual patient data from the previous studies.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of the Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase databases for studies published until 17 November 2022. The selected MeSH search terms were "hearing loss" OR "hearing impairment" OR "ototoxicity" OR "vestibular toxicity" OR "audiovestibular toxicity" AND "immune checkpoint inhibitor" OR "immunotherapy."

RESULTS

A total of 38 patients were included. Melanoma was the most frequent diagnosis (73.7%). The median time from ICI initiation to hearing loss development was 3 months. The hearing impairment was secondary to bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in 24 (68.6%) patients, and at least one other irAE accompanied the hearing loss in 24 patients. Hearing loss significantly improved in 45.7% of the patients. The overall response rate and disease control rate were 67.6% and 85.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We observed that most cases of ICI-related hearing loss were reversible, observed in patients with melanoma, accompanied by other irAEs, and associated with a high response rate to ICIs. With the expanded use of ICIs in the earlier treatment lines and adjuvant settings, the number of survivors with ICI-related hearing loss is expected to increase. Further research is needed to define the true prevalence of ICI-related hearing loss, optimal diagnosis, and management.

Bilateral cochlear implantation after immunotherapy-related profound hearing loss: A case report

OBJECTIVES

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are being utilized with increasing frequency and may be linked to neurologic and audiovestibular toxicities. This report aimed to describe a case of ICI-induced sensorineural hearing loss ultimately requiring bilateral cochlear implantation.

METHODS

A 42-year-old female with stage IV metastatic melanoma of the perianal skin was treated with ipilimumab (blocker of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 [CTLA-4]) and nivolumab (anti-programmed cell death protein 1 [PD1]). After 21 weeks of therapy, she developed sudden vertigo and bilateral hearing loss. A full workup including MRI and lumbar puncture ruled out intracranial parenchymal metastases, leptomeningeal metastases, stroke and intracranial infection. ICI-associated aseptic meningoencephalitis was therefore diagnosed. The patient received systemic steroids as well as intratympanic steroids, which temporarily improved hearing, but eventually developed permanent, bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss.

RESULTS

The patient received bilateral cochlear implants and has demonstrated good performance one year after implantation.

DISCUSSION

ICI are being increasingly used to treat a variety of advanced malignancies. This is the first report of bilateral cochlear implants in the context of profound hearing loss after an immunotherapy induced meningoencephalitis.

CONCLUSION

ICI carries the risk of potential ototoxicity, including profound SNHL as depicted in our case. Cochlear implantation proved to be beneficial and may be considered in patients with ICI-related hearing loss.

Updates in toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a pillar of treatment for numerous cancers with increasing use in combination with other ICIs and in earlier stages of disease treatment. Although effective, ICI use is accompanied by a milieu of potentially bothersome or even life-threatening toxicities known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs), necessitating careful monitoring and early intervention.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we provide an overview of recent advances surrounding toxicity pathophysiology and treatment in the context of relevant organ systems. An emphasis on current treatments by toxicity, as well as updates on steroid-refractory toxicities, chronic toxicities, and biomarkers will be a focus of this update on the current understanding of irAEs.

EXPERT OPINION

ICI toxicities are a major limitation on the deployment of multi-agent ICI regimens and are thus a major priority to understand, treat, and prevent. Recent developments have led to greater understanding of the pathophysiology of these events, which may lead to improved prevention or mitigation strategies. Further, early studies have also suggested steroid-sparing approaches that may be useful. Ultimately, preventing and managing irAEs will be a key goal toward successful ICI treatment across a broader range of patients with cancer.

Ototoxicity Review: A Growing Number of Non-Platinum-Based Chemo- and Immunotherapies

OBJECTIVE

To raise awareness of the growing list of non-platinum-based chemo- and immunotherapeutic agents that have been associated with ototoxicity and to introduce the possible mechanism of ototoxicity of these agents.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science.

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses). PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for published reports of ototoxicity from non-platinum-based chemo- and immunotherapeutic agents in adult and pediatric patients. Therapies that utilized any platinum-based agent were excluded.

CONCLUSIONS

Ototoxicity from non-platinum-based chemo- and immunotherapies is an evolving problem. There were 54 reports-39 case reports and 15 cohort studies-documenting ototoxicity from 7 agents/combination therapies. Of these reports, 37 (69%) were published within the last 15 years (after 2005). No recovery of hearing was documented in 21 of 56 cases (38%). Pretreatment audiograms were uncommon (19/54 studies, 35%), despite documented ototoxic associations.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

There is a growing number of novel, ototoxic, non-platinum-based chemo- and immunotherapeutic agents with various potential mechanisms of action. Otolaryngologists will need to prioritize awareness of these agents. This growing list of agents, many of which have reversible effects, suggest a need for standardized ototoxicity monitor protocols so that appropriate and timely management options can be implemented.

Audiovestibular Toxicity Secondary to Immunotherapy: Case Series and Literature Review

Introduction

Audiovestibular toxicity secondary to immunotherapy has only rarely been reported in the literature. Herein, we examine our experience diagnosing and managing audiovestibular immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients undergoing immunotherapy.

Methods

Four patients who experienced irAEs were included. Demographics, immunotherapy regimen, diagnostic tests, treatment, and outcomes were recorded in a retrospective chart review.

Results

The cases of three patients with metastatic melanoma and one patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma are presented. Hearing loss and tinnitus were the most common presenting symptoms. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were implicated in three cases and T-cell therapy in one case. Two of three patients (67%) treated with steroids had substantial improvements in hearing.

Conclusions

Audiovestibular irAEs are a rare complication of immunotherapy. Suspicion for symptoms including hearing loss, tinnitus, and/or vertigo should prompt an expedient referral to the otolaryngologist for evaluation, as symptoms may improve with corticosteroid use. Hearing and/or vestibular deficits can have a substantial impact on the quality of life for affected patients, but rehabilitation options do exist.

Immune-Related Oral, Otologic, and Ocular Adverse Events

Emerging immunotherapeutic agents, including immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), and programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1), have revolutionized cancer treatment. The first immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) ipilimumab, an anti-CTLA-4, was approved in 2011. Since then, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved more than half a dozen immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat various malignancies. These agents are part of a broader class of chemotherapy agents termed immunotherapy, which selectively target different steps in the immune response cascade to upregulate the body's normal response to cancer. While the effects of traditional chemotherapy are well known, the toxicity profile of emerging immune therapies is not fully elucidated. They have been associated with atypical side effects labeled collectively as immune-related adverse events (irAEs).