Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide reduces the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease in patients with acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndromes who receive immune checkpoint inhibitors after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Nivolumab Plus 5-Azacitidine in Pediatric Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): Phase I/II Trial Results from the Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia and Lymphoma (TACL) Consortium

Improvements in survival have been made over the past two decades for childhood acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but the approximately 40% of patients who relapse continue to have poor outcomes. A combination of checkpoint-inhibitor nivolumab and azacitidine has demonstrated improvements in median survival in adults with AML. This phase I/II study with nivolumab and azacitidine in children with relapsed/refractory AML (NCT03825367) was conducted through the Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia & Lymphoma consortium. Thirteen patients, median age 13.7 years, were enrolled. Patients had refractory disease with multiple reinduction attempts. Twelve evaluable patients were treated at the recommended phase II dose (established at dose level 1, 3 mg/kg/dose). Four patients (33%) maintained stable disease. This combination was well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities observed. Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were primarily hematological. Febrile neutropenia was the most common AE ≥ grade 3. A trend to improved quality of life was noted. Increases in CD8+ T cells and reductions in CD4+/CD8+ T cells and demethylation were observed. The combination was well tolerated and had an acceptable safety profile in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory AML. Future studies might explore this combination for the maintenance of remission in children with AML at high risk of relapse.

Immune checkpoint blockade in hematological malignancies: current state and future potential

Malignant cells are known to evade immune surveillance by engaging immune checkpoints which are negative regulators of the immune system. By restoring the T-lymphocyte mediated anti-tumor effect, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment of solid tumors but have met rather modest success in hematological malignancies. Currently, the only FDA approved indications for ICI therapy are in classic hodgkin lymphoma and primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma. Multiple clinical trials have assessed ICI therapy alone and in combination with standard of care treatments in other lymphomas, plasma cell neoplasms and myeloid neoplasms but were noted to have limited efficacy. These trials mostly focused on PD-1/PDL-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors. Recently, there has been an effort to target other T-lymphocyte checkpoints like LAG-3, TIM-3, TIGIT along with improving strategies of PD-1/PDL-1 and CTLA-4 inhibition. Drugs targeting the macrophage checkpoint, CD47, are also being tested. Long term safety and efficacy data from these ongoing studies are eagerly awaited. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the mechanism of immune checkpoint inhibitors, the key takeaways from the reported results of completed and ongoing studies of these therapies in the context of hematological malignancies.

Relapse after allogeneic transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide: Shattering myths and evolving insight

Early studies in allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (alloBMT) demonstrated that HLA-mismatching was protective again relapse. However, benefits in relapse reduction were outweighed by a high risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) when using conventional pharmacological immunosuppression. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide(PTCy)-based platforms abated the risk of GVHD thereby overcoming the negative effects of HLA-mismatching on survival. However, since its inception, PTCy has been shadowed by a reputation for a greater risk of relapse when compared with traditional GVHD prophylaxis. Specifically, whether PTCy reduces the anti-tumor efficacy of HLA-mismatched alloBMT by killing alloreactive T cells has been the subject of debate since the early 2000's. Here we review the many studies demonstrating the potent graft-versus-malignancy (GVM) properties of alloBMT with PTCy. We discuss the laboratory data from PTCy platforms supporting that T regulatory cells may be a major mechanism of prevention of GVHD and that natural killer (NK) cells may be early effectors of GVM. Finally, we propose potential paths to optimize GVM through selecting for class II mismatching and augmenting NK cell activity.

Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients Aged Over 60 Years

In myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), neoplastic cells originate in hematopoietic stem cells of the bone marrow, causing dysplasia in multiple cell lines. This may ultimately lead to cytopenia and anemia. MDS generally occurs in patients aged over 60 years, and if left unchecked, it can lead to secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML), which has a worse prognosis than de novo AML. Hence, it is important to find methods to treat and manage MDS and prevent secondary AML. This review tries to point out the best methods to find out the best possible treatment for MDS, which can lead to its remission or possibly cure and prevent it from progressing into AML. In order to do this, the pathogenesis of MDS is taken into account, and it is clear that the various molecular mutations that lead to the hematologic neoplasms directly affect the different chemotherapy agents that can be used. The different common mutations leading to MDS and secondary AML have been reviewed along with the drugs best inclined to target them. Some mutations lead to a worse prognosis than others, and ongoing mutations can lead to drug-resistant neoplasms. Thus, drugs targeting the mutations need to be used. The feasibility of an allogeneic stem cell transplant is also taken into account, as this can lead to a total cure of MDS. Methods of decreasing post-transplant recovery time and complications have been looked into, and more studies need to be done on the matter. Currently, it is clear that a more personalized approach to each individual case with its own set of drug combinations is the best approach to treating MDS and secondary leukemia and increasing the overall survival (OS).

Treatment of Richter's syndrome

Richter's syndrome (RS) is an aggressive histologic transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), most commonly to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Outcomes are generally poor, with complete remission (CR) rates of only about 20% and less than 20% long-term survival with chemoimmunotherapy (CIT). RS is biologically heterogeneous, and in 80% of patients with CLL who develop DLBCL, the disease is clonally related to the CLL. Clonally unrelated cases are genetically and immunologically distinct from clonally related DLBCL-RS, have more favorable responses to CIT, and are best treated as de novo DLBCL. Relatively favorable outcomes with CIT are also seen in patients who have never previously received treatment for CLL and who lack TP53 mutation or deletion. For the remaining patients, treatment on a clinical trial is optimal. Fortunately, numerous agents are now in clinical development that show encouraging results. Here we review clinical data for some of the most promising approaches. DLBCL-RS tumor cells frequently express programmed cell death 1 protein (PD-1), and several studies have demonstrated activity for PD-1 inhibitors, especially in combination with ibrutinib. The BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax in combination with R-EPOCH CIT achieved CR in 50% of patients, and a study of venetoclax-R-CHOP is ongoing. The noncovalent Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor pirtobrutinib has achieved responses in approximately two-thirds of heavily pretreated patients and, given its favorable toxicity profile, appears ideally suited to combining with other active agents. Finally, we review available data for bispecific antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, which, after revolutionizing the treatment of DLBCL, are now being evaluated in RS.

Cytomegalovirus-specific neutralizing antibodies effectively prevent uncontrolled infection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains one of the most frequent and life-threatening infectious complications after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Herein, we comprehensively compared the immune cells of patients with uncontrolled and controlled CMV infection post-allo-HSCT and found that B-cells were extraordinarily insufficient because of impaired B-cells reconstitution in the uncontrolled infection group. Furthermore, in the controlled infection group, reconstructed B-cells showed signatures of mature B-cells, high expression of CXCR4 and IFITM1, and enrichment of CMV-associated B-cell receptors, which were lacking in the uncontrolled infection group. Consistently, sera from the uncontrolled infection group failed to inhibit CMV infection via neutralizing virus in vitro because of its lower content of anti-CMV-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) than the controlled infection group. Overall, these results highlighted the contribution of B cells and anti-CMV-specific neutralizing IgGs to the restraint of CMV infection post-allo-HSCT, suggesting their potential as a supplementary treatment to improve outcomes.

Advances in immune therapies in hematological malignancies

Immunotherapy in cancer takes advantage of the exquisite specificity, potency, and flexibility of the immune system to eliminate alien tumor cells. It involves strategies to activate the entire immune defense, by unlocking mechanisms developed by tumor cells to escape from surrounding immune cells, as well as engineered antibody and cellular therapies. What is important to note is that these are therapeutics with curative potential. The earliest example of immune therapy is allogeneic stem cell transplantation, introduced in 1957, which is still an important modality in hematology, most notably in myeloid malignancies. In this review, we discuss developmental trends of immunotherapy in hematological malignancies, focusing on some of the strategies that we believe will have the most impact on future clinical practice in this field. In particular, we delineate novel developments for therapies that have already been introduced into the clinic, such as immune checkpoint inhibition and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies. Finally, we discuss the therapeutic potential of emerging strategies based on T-cell receptors and adoptive transfer of allogeneic natural killer cells.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of many solid tumors, with limited progress made in the area of myeloid malignancies. The low mutational burden of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is one potential reason behind the lack of activity of T-cell harnessing ICIs, particularly CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibitors. Innate immune checkpoints play a critical role in the immune escape of AML and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The CD47 targeting agent, magrolimab, has shown promising activity when combined with azacitidine in early phase trials conducted in AML and higher-risk MDS, especially among patients harboring a TP53 mutation. Similarly, sabatolimab (an anti-TIM-3 monoclonal antibody) plus hypomethylating agents have shown durable responses in higher-risk MDS and AML in early clinical trials. Randomized trials are currently ongoing to confirm the efficacy of these agents. In this review, we will present the current progress and future directions of immune checkpoint inhibition in AML and MDS.

Case Report: Preemptive Treatment With Low-Dose PD-1 Blockade and Azacitidine for Molecular Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia With RUNX1-RUNX1T1 After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who develop hematological relapse (HR) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) generally have dismal clinical outcomes. Measurable residual disease (MRD)-directed preemptive interventions are effective approaches to prevent disease progression and improve prognosis for molecular relapsed patients with warning signs of impending HR. In this situation, boosting the graft-vs-leukemia (GVL) effect with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) might be a promising prevention strategy, despite the potential for causing severe graft-vs-host disease (GVHD). In the present study, we reported for the first time an AML patient with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 who underwent preemptive treatment with the combined application of tislelizumab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) and azacitidine to avoid HR following allo-HSCT. On day +81, molecular relapse with MRD depicted by RUNX1-RUN1T1-positivity as well as mixed donor chimerism occurred in the patient. On day +95, with no signs of GVHD and an excellent eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (ECOG PS), the patient thus was administered with 100 mg of tislelizumab on day 1 and 100 mg of azacitidine on days 1-7. After the combination therapy, complete remission was successfully achieved with significant improvement in hematologic response, and the MRD marker RUNX1-RUNX1T1 turned negative, along with a complete donor chimerism in bone marrow. Meanwhile, the patient experienced moderate GVHD and immune-related adverse events (irAEs), successively involving the lung, liver, lower digestive tract and urinary system, which were well controlled by immunosuppressive therapies. As far as we know, this case is the first one to report the use of tislelizumab in combination with azacitidine to prevent post-transplant relapse in AML. In summary, the application of ICIs in MRD positive patients might be an attractive strategy for immune modulation in the future to reduce the incidence of HR in the post-transplant setting, but safer clinical application schedules need to be explored.

Hematologic complications of immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are a class of anti-neoplastic therapies that unleash immune cells to kill malignant cells. There are currently 7 medications FDA-approved for the treatment of 14 solid tumors and 2 hematological malignancies. These medications commonly cause immune-related adverse effects due to overactive T lymphocytes, autoantibody production, and/or cytokine dysregulation. Hematological toxicities are rare and of uncertain mechanism, and therefore management is often based on experiences with familiar conditions involving these perturbed immune responses, such as autoimmune hemolytic anemia, immune thrombocytopenia, and idiopathic aplastic anemia. Management is challenging because one must attend to the hematological toxicity while simultaneously attending to the malignancy, with the imperative that effective cancer therapy be maintained or minimally interrupted if possible. The purpose of this review is to assist clinicians by providing a clinical and pathophysiological framework in which to view these problems.