Combination of eriocalyxin B and homoharringtonine exerts synergistic anti-tumor effects against t(8;21) AML

Understanding the molecular pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with well-defined genomic abnormalities has facilitated the development of targeted therapeutics. Patients with t(8;21) AML frequently harbor a fusion gene RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and KIT mutations as "secondary hit", making the disease one of the ideal models for exploring targeted treatment options in AML. In this study we investigated the combination therapy of agents targeting RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and KIT in the treatment of t(8;21) AML with KIT mutations. We showed that the combination of eriocalyxin B (EriB) and homoharringtonine (HHT) exerted synergistic therapeutic effects by dual inhibition of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and KIT proteins in Kasumi-1 and SKNO-1 cells in vitro. In Kasumi-1 cells, the combination of EriB and HHT could perturb the RUNX1-RUNX1T1-responsible transcriptional network by destabilizing RUNX1-RUNX1T1 transcription factor complex (AETFC), forcing RUNX1-RUNX1T1 leaving from the chromatin, triggering cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Meanwhile, EriB combined with HHT activated JNK signaling, resulting in the eventual degradation of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 by caspase-3. In addition, HHT and EriB inhibited NF-κB pathway through blocking p65 nuclear translocation in two different manners, to synergistically interfere with the transcription of KIT. In mice co-expressing RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and KITN822K, co-administration of EriB and HHT significantly prolonged survival of the mice by targeting CD34+CD38- leukemic cells. The synergistic effects of the two drugs were also observed in bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMCs) of t(8;21) AML patients. Collectively, this study reveals the synergistic mechanism of the combination regimen of EriB and HHT in t(8;21) AML, providing new insight into optimizing targeted treatment of AML.

Application of prophylactic or pre-emptive therapy after allogeneic transplantation for high-risk patients with t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia

OBJECTIVES

To determine the impact of pretransplant measurable residual disease (pre-MRD) and the efficacy of maintenance therapy in t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 100 t(8;21) AML patients who underwent allo-HCT between 2013 and 2022. 40 patients received pre-emptive therapy including immunosuppressant adjustment, azacitidine, and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) combined with chemotherapy. 23 patients received prophylactic therapy, including azacitidine or chidamide.

RESULTS

Patients with a positive pre-MRD (pre-MRDpos) had a higher 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) (25.90% [95% CI, 13.87%-39.70%] vs 5.00% [95% CI, 0.88%-15.01%]; P = 0.008). Pre-MRDpos patients were less likely to have a superior 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) (40.83% [95% CI, 20.80%-80.16%]) if their MRD was still positive at 28 days after transplantation (post-MRD₂₈pos). The 3-year DFS and CIR were 53.17% (95% CI, 38.31% - 73.80%) and 34.87% (95% CI, 18.84% - 51.44%), respectively, for patients receiving pre-emptive interventions after molecular relapse. The 3-year DFS and CIR were 90.00% (95%CI, 77.77% - 100%) and 5.00% (95%CI, 0.31% - 21.10%), respectively, for high-risk patients receiving prophylactic therapy. In most patients, epigenetic-drug-induced adverse events were reversible with dose adjustment or temporary discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Patients with pre-MRDpos and post-MRD₂₈pos were more likely to have higher rates of relapse and inferior DFS, even after receiving pre-emptive interventions. Prophylactic therapy may be a better option for high-risk t(8;21) AML patients; however, this warrants further investigation.

Systemic Mastocytosis with Associated Hematological Neoplasms. Diagnostic features and unique response pattern to tyrosine kinase inhibitors and allo-bone marrow transplantation therapy

Systemic Mastocytosis is a clonal proliferation of mast cells; in a significant fraction of cases it is associated with another concurrent hematological neoplasm. Molecular analysis of KIT mutations and other associated genetic alterations suggest a common origin in the stem cell compartment. Mast cell infiltration patterns in bone marrow biopsy may be subtle in cases associated with t (8;21) AML. Here we report three cases of clonally related SM-AHN, two cases with SM-CMML and one case with SM- t (8;21) AML. We describe in detail the bone marrow infiltration pattern at diagnosis and during the course of treatment with allogeneic stem cell transplant and novel TK inhibitors, showing the unique dynamics of mast cell clearance after therapy.

AML1-ETO-Related Fusion Circular RNAs Contribute to the Proliferation of Leukemia Cells

The AML1-ETO (RUNX1-RUNX1T1) fusion gene created by the chromosome translocation t(8;21) (q21;q22) is one of the essential contributors to leukemogenesis. Only a few studies in the literature have focused on fusion gene-derived circular RNAs (f-circRNAs). Here, we report several AML1-ETO-related fusion circular RNAs (F-CircAEs) in AML1-ETO-positive cell lines and primary patient blasts. Functional studies demonstrate that the over-expression of F-CircAE in NIH3T3 cells promotes cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo. F-CircAE expression enhances the colony formation ability of c-Kit⁺ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). Meanwhile, the knockdown of endogenous F-CircAEs can inhibit the proliferation and colony formation ability of AML1-ETO-positive Kasumi-1 cells. Intriguingly, bioinformatic analysis revealed that the glycolysis pathway is down-regulated in F-CircAE-knockdown Kasumi-1 cells and up-regulated in F-CircAE over-expressed NIH3T3 cells. Further studies show that F-CircAE binds to the glycolytic protein ENO-1, up-regulates the expression level of glycolytic enzymes, and enhances lactate production. In summary, our study demonstrates that F-CircAE may exert biological activities on the growth of AML1-ETO leukemia cells by regulating the glycolysis pathway. Determining the role of F-CircAEs in AML1-ETO leukemia can lead to great strides in understanding its pathogenesis, thus providing new diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets.

Case Report: Preemptive Treatment With Low-Dose PD-1 Blockade and Azacitidine for Molecular Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia With RUNX1-RUNX1T1 After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who develop hematological relapse (HR) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) generally have dismal clinical outcomes. Measurable residual disease (MRD)-directed preemptive interventions are effective approaches to prevent disease progression and improve prognosis for molecular relapsed patients with warning signs of impending HR. In this situation, boosting the graft-vs-leukemia (GVL) effect with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) might be a promising prevention strategy, despite the potential for causing severe graft-vs-host disease (GVHD). In the present study, we reported for the first time an AML patient with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 who underwent preemptive treatment with the combined application of tislelizumab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) and azacitidine to avoid HR following allo-HSCT. On day +81, molecular relapse with MRD depicted by RUNX1-RUN1T1-positivity as well as mixed donor chimerism occurred in the patient. On day +95, with no signs of GVHD and an excellent eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (ECOG PS), the patient thus was administered with 100 mg of tislelizumab on day 1 and 100 mg of azacitidine on days 1-7. After the combination therapy, complete remission was successfully achieved with significant improvement in hematologic response, and the MRD marker RUNX1-RUNX1T1 turned negative, along with a complete donor chimerism in bone marrow. Meanwhile, the patient experienced moderate GVHD and immune-related adverse events (irAEs), successively involving the lung, liver, lower digestive tract and urinary system, which were well controlled by immunosuppressive therapies. As far as we know, this case is the first one to report the use of tislelizumab in combination with azacitidine to prevent post-transplant relapse in AML. In summary, the application of ICIs in MRD positive patients might be an attractive strategy for immune modulation in the future to reduce the incidence of HR in the post-transplant setting, but safer clinical application schedules need to be explored.

Preemptive Immunotherapy for Minimal Residual Disease in Patients With t(8;21) Acute Myeloid Leukemia After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

In patients with t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia (AML), recurrent minimal residual disease (MRD) measured by RUNX1-RUNX1T1 transcript levels can predict relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). This study aimed to compare the efficacy of preemptive interferon (IFN)-α therapy and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) in patients with t(8;21) AML following allo-HSCT. We also evaluated the appropriate method for patients with different levels of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 transcripts. In this retrospective study, consecutive patients who had high-risk t(8;21) AML and received allo-HSCT were enrolled. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) age ≤65 years; (2) regained MRD positive following allo-HSCT. MRD positive was defined as the loss of a ≥4.5-log reduction and/or <4.5-log reduction in the RUNX1-RUNX1T1 transcripts, and high-level, intermediate-level, and low-level MRDs were, respectively, defined as <2.5-log, 2.5-3.5-log, and 3.5-4.5-log reductions in the transcripts compared with the pretreatment baseline level. Patients with positive RUNX1-RUNX1T1 could receive preemptive IFN-α therapy or DLI, which was primarily based on donor availability and the intentions of physicians and patients. The patients received recombinant human IFN-α-2b therapy by subcutaneous injection twice a week every 4 weeks. IFN-α therapy was scheduled for six cycles or until the RUNX1-RUNX1T1 transcripts were negative for at least two consecutive tests. The rates of MRD turning negative for patients with low-level, intermediate-level, and high-level RUNX1-RUNX1T1 receiving IFN-α were 87.5%, 58.1%, and 22.2%, respectively; meanwhile, for patients with intermediate-level and high-level RUNX1-RUNX1T1 receiving DLI, the rates were 50.0% and 14.3%, respectively. For patients with low-level and intermediate-level RUNX1-RUNX1T1, the probability of overall survival at 2 years was higher in the IFN-α group than in the DLI group (87.6% vs. 55.6%; p = 0.003). For patients with high levels of RUNX1-RUNX1T1, the probability of overall survival was comparable between the IFN-α and DLI groups (53.3% vs. 83.3%; p = 0.780). Therefore, patients with low-level and intermediate-level RUNX1-RUNX1T1 could benefit more from preemptive IFN-α therapy compared with DLI. Clinical outcomes were comparable between preemptive IFN-α therapy and DLI in patients with high-level RUNX1-RUNX1T1; however, they should be further improved.

Clinical values of gene alterations as marker of minimal residual disease in non-M3 acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a malignant disease of the hematopoietic system. Residual leukemic cells after treatment are associated with relapse. Thus, detecting minimal residual disease (MRD) is significant. Major techniques for MRD assessment include multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and next-generation sequencing (NGS). At a molecular level, AML is the consequence of collaboration of several gene alterations. Some of these gene alterations can also be used as MRD markers to evaluate the level of residual leukemic cells by PCR and NGS. However, when as MRD markers, different gene alterations have different clinical values. This paper aims to summarize the characteristics of various MRD markers, so as to better predict the clinical outcome of AML patients and guide the treatment.

Characteristics and prognosis of pediatric myeloid sarcoma in the cytogenetic context of t(8;21)

The prognosis of myeloid sarcoma (MS) is controversial. Many reports indicated that orbital-MS has a good prognosis and is closely related to t(8;21), but the prognostic role of MS in pediatric t(8;21) AML is unclear. We retrospectively analyzed data from 127 patients with pediatric t(8;21) AML diagnosed between January 2010 and June 2018. We compared patients with (n = 30) and without MS (n = 97). The median follow-up time was 52.6 months. The proportion of t(8;21) AML patients with MS was 23.6%. Males were more likely to have MS than females. The complete remission rate after the first course of induction chemotherapy and the 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) among patients with MS were lower than those among patients without MS (60% vs. 78.4%, p = 0.045) (68.8 ± 8.8% vs. 88.0 ± 3.4%, p = 0.004). The female sex and a higher level of RUNX1/RUNX1T1 transcripts after consolidation were risk factors for poor RFS among patients with MS. Our data showed that MS was an independent risk factor in pediatric t(8;21) AML. Close monitoring of measurable residual disease of the bone marrow and extramedullary lesions is needed to guide stratified treatment.

High aldehyde dehydrogenase activity at diagnosis predicts relapse in patients with t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with t(8;21) is a heterogeneous disease. Although the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD), which is indicated by RUNX1‐RUNX1T1 transcript levels, plays a key role in directing treatment, risk stratification needs to be improved, and other markers need to be assessed. A total of 66 t(8;21) AML patients were tested for aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity by flow cytometry at diagnosis, and 52 patients were followed up for a median of 20 (1‐34) months. The median percentage of CD34+ALDH+, CD34+CD38‐ALDH+, and CD34+CD38+ALDH+ cells among nucleated cells were 0.028%, 0.012%, and 0.0070%, respectively. The CD34+ALDH+‐H, CD34+CD38‐ALDH+‐H, and CD34+CD38+ALDH+‐H statuses (the percentage of cells that were higher than the individual cutoffs) were all significantly associated with a lower 2‐year relapse‐free survival (RFS) rate in both the whole cohort and adult patients (P = .015, .016, and .049; P = .014, .018, and .032). Patients with < 3‐log reduction in the RUNX1‐RUNX1T1 transcript level after the second consolidation therapy (defined as MRD‐H) had a significantly lower 2‐year RFS rate than patients with ≥ 3‐log reduction (MRD‐L) (P = .017). The CD34+ALDH+ status at diagnosis was then combined with the MRD status. CD34+ALDH+‐L/MRD‐H patients had similar 2‐year RFS rates to both CD34+ALDH+‐L/MRD‐L and CD34+ALDH+‐H/MRD‐L patients (P = .50 and 1.0); and CD34+ALDH+‐H/MRD‐H patients had significantly lower 2‐year RFS rate compared with CD34+ALDH+‐L and/or MRD‐L patients (P < .0001). Multivariate analysis showed that CD34+ALDH+‐H/MRD‐H was an independent adverse prognostic factor for relapse. In conclusion, ALDH status at diagnosis may improve MRD‐based risk stratification in t(8;21) AML, and concurrent high levels of CD34+ALDH+ at diagnosis and MRD predict relapse.

Negative CD19 expression is associated with inferior relapse-free survival in children with RUNX1-RUNX1T1-positive acute myeloid leukaemia: results from the Japanese Paediatric Leukaemia/Lymphoma Study Group AML-05 study

We performed a retrospective analysis of leukaemic surface antigen expression and genomic data from a total of 100 RUNX1-RUNX1T1-positive paediatric acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients enrolled in the Japanese Paediatric Leukaemia/Lymphoma Study Group (JPLSG) AML-05 protocol to determine risk factors for relapse. In univariate analysis, the KIT exon 17 mutation (n = 21) and CD19 negativity (n = 59) were significant risk factors for relapse (P = 0·01). In multivariate analysis, CD19 negativity was the sole significant risk factor for relapse (hazard ratio, 3·09; 95% confidence interval, 1·26-7·59; P < 0·01), suggesting that biological differences between CD19-positive and CD19-negative RUNX1-RUNX1T1 AML patients should be investigated.

Elucidation of Novel Therapeutic Targets for Acute Myeloid Leukemias with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 Fusion

The RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion is a frequent chromosomal alteration in acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs). Although RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion protein has pivotal roles in the development of AMLs with the fusion, RUNX1-RUNX1T1, fusion protein is difficult to target, as it lacks kinase activities. Here, we used bioinformatic tools to elucidate targetable signaling pathways in AMLs with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion. After analysis of 93 AML cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, we found expression of 293 genes that correlated to the expression of the RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion gene. Based on these 293 genes, the cyclooxygenase (COX), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) pathways were predicted to be specifically activated in AMLs with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion. Moreover, the in vitro proliferation of AML cells with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion decreased significantly more than that of AML cells without the fusion, when the pathways were inhibited pharmacologically. The results indicate that novel targetable signaling pathways could be identified by the analysis of the gene expression features of AMLs with non-targetable genetic alterations. The elucidation of specific molecular targets for AMLs that have a specific genetic alteration would promote personalized treatment of AMLs and improve clinical outcomes.

Measurable residual disease testing for personalized treatment of acute myeloid leukemia

This review summarizes - with the practicing hematologist in mind - the methods used to determine measurable residual disease (MRD) in everyday practice with some future perspectives, and the current knowledge about the prognostic impact of MRD on outcome in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), excluding acute promyelocytic leukemia. Possible implications for choice of MRD method, timing of MRD monitoring, and guidance of therapy are discussed in general and in some detail for certain types of leukemia with specific molecular markers to monitor, including core binding factor (CBF)-leukemias and NPM1-mutated leukemias.

The immunophenotypic characteristics and flow cytometric scoring system of acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21) (q22;q22); RUNX1-RUNX1T1

INTRODUCTION

The translocation t(8;21) is one of the most frequent chromosome translocations in AML. Molecular (cyto)genetics is regarded as the gold standard for diagnosis. However, due to the complicated variety of AML-related genetic abnormalities, comprehensive screening for all of these abnormalities may not be cost-effective. Therefore, a flow cytometric (FC) scoring system was generated in this study for rapid screening and diagnosis of t(8;21)AML.

METHODS

The immunophenotypic characteristics of leukemic cells and neutrophils in cases with t(8;21) AML or other subtypes of AML were analyzed to find a method for the flow diagnosis of t(8;21) AML.

RESULTS

In this study, we picked six FC features pointing to the diagnosis of t(8;21) AML: The blasts show high-intensity expression of CD34; aberrant expression of CD19, cCD79a, and CD56 in myeloblasts; co-expression of CD56 in neutrophils, especially in immature neutrophils; and a maturity disturbance in granulocytes. A six-point score was devised using these features. By ROC analysis, the AUC was 0.952, and the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 0.86, 0.90. 0.91, and 0.84 when the score was ≥3 points. The score was then prospectively validated on an independent cohort, and the AUC of the ROC curve for the validation cohort was 0.975. When the cutoff value was set at 3, the obtained sensitivity and specificity values were 0.91 and 0.94, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The FC score described can be used for the identification and rapid screening of t(8;21) AML.

A minicircuitry of microRNA-9-1 and RUNX1-RUNX1T1 contributes to leukemogenesis in t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia

MicroRNA-9-1(miR-9-1) plays an important role in the mechanism that regulates the lineage fate of differentiating hematopoietic cells. Recent studies have shown that miR-9-1 is downregulated in t (8; 21) AML. However, the pathogenic mechanisms underlying miR-9-1 downregulation and the RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion protein, generated from the translocation of t (8; 21) in AML, remain unclear. RUNX1-RUNX1T1 can induce leukemogenesis through resides in and functions as a stable RUNX1-RUNX1T1-containing transcription factor complex. In this study, we demonstrate that miR-9-1 expression increases significantly after the treatment of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 (+) AML cell lines with decitabine (a DNMT inhibitor) and trichostatin A (an HDAC inhibitor). In addition, we show that RUNX1-RUNX1T1 triggers the heterochromatic silencing of miR-9-1 by binding to RUNX1-binding sites in the promoter region of miR-9-1 and recruiting chromatin-remodeling enzymes, DNMTs, and HDACs, contributing to hypermethylation of miR-9-1 in t (8; 21) AML. Furthermore, because RUNX1, RUNX1T1, and RUNX1-RUNX1T1 are all regulated by miR-9-1, the silencing of miR-9-1 enhances the oncogenic activity of these genes. Besides, overexpression of miR-9-1 induces differentiation and inhibits proliferation in t (8; 21) AML cell lines. In conclusion, our results indicate a feedback circuitry involving miR-9-1 and RUNX1-RUNX1T1, contributing to leukemogenesis in RUNX1-RUNX1T1 (+) AML cell lines.

Prognosis and monitoring of core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: current and emerging factors

Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) - including AML with t(8;21) and AML with inv(16) - accounts for about 15% of adult AML and is associated with a relatively favorable prognosis. Nonetheless, relapse incidence may reach 40% in these patients. In this context, identification of prognostic markers is considered of great interest. Due to similarities between their molecular and prognostic features, t(8;21) and inv(16)-AML are usually grouped and reported together in clinical studies. However, considerable experimental evidences have highlighted that they represent two distinct entities and should be considered separately for further studies. This review summarizes recent laboratory and clinical findings in this particular subset of AML and how they could be used to improve management of patients in routine practice.