SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Pre-emptive Therapy at Molecular Measurable Residual Disease Failure in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Molecular measurable residual disease (MRD, eg, by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, RT-qPCR), is an integral part of response assessment in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with established prognostic and evolving therapeutic significance. MRD failure can occur through several pathways (namely MRD persistence at the end of treatment at a high level, MRD progression from a low level or MRD re-emergence during follow up; the latter two constitute MRD relapse as defined by the European Leukemia Net) and is clinically actionable, with survival benefit reported in AML subgroups. Selection of pre-emptive therapy at MRD failure relies upon an integrated clinico-molecular assessment and is subset-specific. In acute promyelocytic leukemia, arsenic trioxide-based regimen for MRD failure following frontline treatment with all-trans-retinoic acid plus chemotherapy represents standard of care, while hypomethylating agents (eg, azacitidine), salvage chemotherapy (eg, FLAG-IDA) and venetoclax-based regimens are effective in NPM1-mutated AML. Specific inhibitors of FLT3 have emerging use in FLT3-mutated AML and are associated with minimal toxicity. Furthermore, immunotherapeutic approaches such as donor lymphocyte infusions and interferon-⍺ are efficacious options in the post-allogeneic-HSCT settings. Enrollment into clinical trials with genomic-guided assignment of pre-emptive therapy at MRD failure should be prioritized. Finally, with the emergence of novel agents (eg, menin inhibitors) and approaches (eg, adoptive cellular and immunological therapy), an exciting future lies ahead where a broad array of highly active pre-emptive therapeutic options will likely be clinically applicable to a wide range of AML subsets.

The core concepts of core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: Current considerations for prognosis and treatment

Core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF AML), defined by t(8;21) or inv(16), is a subset of favorable risk AML. Despite its association with a high complete remission rate after induction and relatively good prognosis overall compared with other subtypes of AML, relapse risk after induction chemotherapy remains high. Optimizing treatment planning to promote recurrence free survival and increase the likelihood of survival after relapse is imperative to improving outcomes. Recent areas of research have included evaluation of the role of gemtuzumab in induction and consolidation, the relative benefit of increased cycles of high dose cytarabine in consolidation, the utility of hypomethylating agents and kinase inhibitors, and the most appropriate timing of stem cell transplant. Surveillance with measurable residual disease testing is increasingly being utilized for monitoring disease in remission, and ongoing investigation seeks to determine how to use this tool for early identification of patients who would benefit from proceeding to transplant. In this review, we outline the current therapeutic approach from diagnosis to relapse while highlighting the active areas of investigation in each stage of treatment.

Characterization of leukemia progression in the Cbfb-MYH11 knockin mice by single cell RNA sequencing

A recurrent inversion of chromosome 16 fuses the genes CBFB and MYH11 and the resultant CBFβ-SMMHC fusion protein acts as a driver of the M4Eo subtype of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This study utilized single cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) to assess gene expression changes during the disease progression from normal to pre-leukemic to overt leukemia in the conditional Cbfb-MYH11 knock-in mouse model. The study investigated dynamic shifts in cell types as disease progresses, and gene expression differences between normal and diseased cells. The study identified a novel cell population in the pre-leukemic state with expression of genes involved in immune activation. Overall, this study discovered hematopoietic cells first affected by the expression of CBFβ-SMMHC and identified unique signature genes for the pre-leukemic cells that separate them from the normal hematopoietic cellular milieu.

Outcome and prognostic factors of CBF pediatric AML patients with t(8;21) differ from patients with inv(16)

PURPOSE

To explore the outcome and prognostic factors between inv(16) and t(8;21) disrupt core binding factor (CBF) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

METHODS

The clinical characteristic, probability of achieving complete remission (CR), overall survival (OS) and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) were compared between inv(16) and (8;21).

RESULTS

The CR rate was 95.2%, 10-year OS was 84.4% and CIR was 29.4%. Subgroup analysis showed that patients with t(8;21) had significant lower 10-year OS and CIR than patients with inv(16). Unexpectedly, there was a trend for pediatric AML receiving five courses cytarabine to have a lower CIR than four courses cytarabine (19.8% vs 29.3%, P = 0.06). Among the cohort of no-gemtuzumab ozogamicin(GO) treatment, inv (16) patients showed a similar 10-year OS (78.9% vs 83.5%; P = 0.69) and an inferior outcome on 10-year CIR (58.6% vs 28.9%, P = 0.01) than those patients with t(8;21). In contrast, inv (16) and t(8;21) patients receiving GO treatment had comparable OS (OS: 90.5% vs. 86.5%, P = 0.66) as well as CIR (40.4% vs. 21.4%, P = 0.13).

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrated that more cumulative cytarabine exposure could improve the outcome of childhood patients with t(8;21), while GO treatment was beneficial to the pediatric patients with inv(16).

AML with inv(16)/t(16;16) and high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities: atypical features and unfavorable outcome

OBJECTIVES

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with inv(16)/t(16;16) is among the most frequent AML subtypes. It is recognized by the detection of the CBFB-MYH11 fusion which confers a favorable prognosis, irrespective of the presence of secondary cytogenetic abnormalities. However, the effect of additional genetic anomalies on the behavior of inv(16) AML is debatable. Recent case reports describe an unfavorable prognosis for those patients, characterized by early relapse and death. In this study, we present a series of patients with CBFB-MYH11 fusion and high-risk rearrangements to increase knowledge about this potentially distinct subgroup.

METHODS

All cases with inv(16)/ t(16;16) and one or more high risk abnormalities were reviewed at two tertiary healthcare centers between years 2006 and 2020 in terms of demographics, biological and clinical data.

RESULTS

Among the total 1447 and 1283 AML cases, the frequency was found to be 0,2% and 0.3%. Clinical data could be retrieved for 5 patients. Detected high-risk abnormalities included TP53 and 5q deletion, complex and monosomal karyotype. The median age was 67 years, with a majority of females (M:F = 1:1.5). Two out of 5 patients presented with therapy related AML, with short latency periods. All patients presented with thrombocytopenia and/or leukocytopenia. Bone marrow aspirates revealed atypical morphology and the detection of rare CBFB-MYH11 fusion transcripts. All 5 patients died, with a short mean overall survival of 5.8 months.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Our series suggests that the presence of high risk abnormalities confers distinct biological features and poor prognosis to inv(16) AML.

Survivin' Acute Myeloid Leukaemia-A Personalised Target for inv(16) Patients

Despite recent advances in therapies including immunotherapy, patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) still experience relatively poor survival rates. The Inhibition of Apoptosis (IAP) family member, survivin, also known by its gene and protein name, Baculoviral IAP Repeat Containing 5 (BIRC5), remains one of the most frequently expressed antigens across AML subtypes. To better understand its potential to act as a target for immunotherapy and a biomarker for AML survival, we examined the protein and pathways that BIRC5 interacts with using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), search tool for recurring instances of neighbouring genes (STRING), WEB-based Gene Set Analysis Toolkit, Bloodspot and performed a comprehensive literature review. We then analysed data from gene expression studies. These included 312 AML samples in the Microarray Innovations In Leukemia (MILE) dataset. We found a trend between above median levels of BIRC5 being associated with improved overall survival (OS) but this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.077, Log-Rank). There was some evidence of a beneficial effect in adjusted analyses where above median levels of BIRC5 were shown to be associated with improved OS (p = 0.001) including in Core Binding Factor (CBF) patients (p = 0.03). Above median levels of BIRC5 transcript were associated with improved relapse free survival (p < 0.0001). Utilisation of a second large cDNA microarray dataset including 306 AML cases, again showed no correlation between BIRC5 levels and OS, but high expression levels of BIRC5 correlated with worse survival in inv(16) patients (p = 0.077) which was highly significant when datasets A and B were combined (p = 0.001). In addition, decreased BIRC5 expression was associated with better clinical outcome (p = 0.004) in AML patients exhibiting CBF mainly due to patients with inv(16) (p = 0.007). This study has shown that BIRC5 expression plays a role in the survival of AML patients, this association is not apparent when we examine CBF patients as a cohort, but when those with inv(16) independently indicating that those patients with inv(16) would provide interesting candidates for immunotherapies that target BIRC5.

[Acute myeloid leukemia with inversion of chromosome 16: cytological, immunophenotypic and cytogenetic disruption]

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with inv(16) is primarily associated with the eosinophilic LAM4 form belonging to the favorable prognosis group of AML. We report the case of an 18-year-old man with acute myeloid leukemia with unusual inversion of chromosome 16. Cytological, phenotypic and cytogenetic investigations showed a divergence from those in the literature. Indeed, the myelogram shows a medullary infiltration by elements blocked at the stage of myeloblates/promyelocytes, containing Auer rods grouped sometimes in fagots in blasts, promyelocytes and neutrophils. In view of this pathognomonic aspect, the diagnosis of AML type M3 is mentioned but quickly questioned by the results of immunophenotyping in favor of a maturing AML (M2). The karyotype and the FISH later objectify a recurrent anomaly "cytologically unexpected" inversion 16 (p13, q22) associated with trisomy 22.

Measurable residual disease testing for personalized treatment of acute myeloid leukemia

This review summarizes - with the practicing hematologist in mind - the methods used to determine measurable residual disease (MRD) in everyday practice with some future perspectives, and the current knowledge about the prognostic impact of MRD on outcome in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), excluding acute promyelocytic leukemia. Possible implications for choice of MRD method, timing of MRD monitoring, and guidance of therapy are discussed in general and in some detail for certain types of leukemia with specific molecular markers to monitor, including core binding factor (CBF)-leukemias and NPM1-mutated leukemias.

Impact of an Additional Chromosome on the Clinical Outcomes of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Adults

The incidence of Philadelphia chromosome positivity (Ph⁺) in adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is very low. Ph⁺ AML is considered to be high risk for failure to attain remission or for early relapse after standard chemotherapy. Because of the low incidence of the disease, it has been difficult to determine the best treatment, including the effects of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We retrospectively analyzed 29 patients with Ph⁺ AML (median age, 45 years; range, 18 to 80) managed at our center between 2002 and 2016. Two patients were not treated at all, 3 received repeated low-dose cytarabine, and 24 were treated with 3 + 7 standard induction chemotherapy. All 27 treated patients also received interim imatinib 400 mg orally until the day of the next chemotherapy cycle began or as conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), which was performed in 17 patients. Of the 29 patients with Ph⁺ AML, 7 (24.1%) had additional inv(16), 3 of whom had therapy-related AML. In the 7 with inv(16), the median age was younger (31 versus 44 years, P = .083) and the complete remission (CR) rate was relatively higher (85.7% versus 54.5%, P = .214) than in those without inv(16). Among the 27 treated patients, 20 (74.1%) achieved CR after standard chemotherapy with interim imatinib and 2 (7.4%) achieved CR after low-dose cytarabine with interim imatinib. After a median follow-up of 65.5 months (range, 13.4 to 156.6), the 5-year overall survival (OS) among all 27 treated patients was 43.1%. For the 17 patients who underwent HCT the 5-year OS of 17 patients (10 in subgroup without inv(16) and 7 in subgroup with inv(16)) treated with allogeneic HCT was 69.3%. All 7 with inv(16) were still alive at the end of the study. In contrast, all patients not treated with HCT died within a median of 6.25 months (range, .2 to 18.2). Interim imatinib combined with chemotherapy yielded an acceptable remission rate in adult patients with Ph⁺ AML. Allogeneic HCT as a postremission therapy provided long-term disease control in two-thirds of those who underwent the transplant. We also demonstrated that inv(16) was related to a favorable outcome in Ph⁺ AML, including therapy-related AML.

Targeting binding partners of the CBFβ-SMMHC fusion protein for the treatment of inversion 16 acute myeloid leukemia

Inversion of chromosome 16 (inv(16)) generates the CBFβ-SMMHC fusion protein and is found in nearly all patients with acute myeloid leukemia subtype M4 with Eosinophilia (M4Eo). Expression of CBFβ-SMMHC is causative for leukemia development, but the molecular mechanisms underlying its activity are unclear. Recently, there have been important advances in defining the role of CBFβ-SMMHC and its binding partners, the transcription factor RUNX1 and the histone deacetylase HDAC8. Importantly, initial trials demonstrate that small molecules targeting these binding partners are effective against CBFβ-SMMHC induced leukemia. This review will discuss recent advances in defining the mechanism of CBFβ-SMMHC activity, as well as efforts to develop new therapies for inv(16) AML.

Outcomes of Patients With Relapsed Core Binding Factor-Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia

PURPOSE

To determine the factors associated with outcomes in patients with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) in first relapse.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 92 patients with CBF-AML in first relapse who presented to our institution from 1990-2014. Clinical and demographic parameters were included in univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model to predict overall survival.

RESULTS

Among the 92 relapsed patients, 60 (65%) patients had inv (16) and 32 (35%) had t (8;21). The median survival for patients with inv(16) cytogenetic group was 15.6 months (range 10.32 to 20.88 months) while for the t(8;21) group was 9 months (range 3.68 to 14.32) (P = .004). Univariate Cox model analysis showed that increased age, high white blood cell count, t (8;21) cytogenetic group, and high bone marrow blast percentage were associated with poor overall outcome, while stem cell transplant intervention was associated with better survival. Additional cytogenetic aberrations at relapse were not associated with survival outcomes (P = .4). Multivariate Cox model analysis showed that t(8;21) cytogenetic group has more hazard of death after adjusting, age, marrow blast percentage, blood cell count, and stem cell transplant(hazard ratio 1.802; P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with relapsed CBF-AML, median survival was less than a year and half and the outcome was worse in patients with t (8;21). Despite the relatively better outcomes, dedicated clinical trials are needed to improve the outcome in all patients with relapsed CBF-AML.

Most Myeloid Neoplasms With Deletion of Chromosome 16q Are Distinct From Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Inv(16)(p13.1q22): A Bone Marrow Pathology Group Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVES

Isolated deletion of the long arm of chromosome 16 (del(16q)) is rare in myeloid neoplasms (MNs) and was historically considered a variant of inv(16)(p13.1q22) (inv(16)), a subtype of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) associated with CBFB-MYH11 rearrangement and favorable prognosis. This study aims to determine clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with isolated del(16q) in MNs in comparison to AMLs with isolated inv(16).

METHODS

Clinicopathologic features were retrospectively reviewed in 18 MNs with del(16q) and 34 AMLs with inv(16) patients from seven institutions.

RESULTS

MNs with del(16q) occurred in elderly patients, often as secondary MNs. Blood monocytes and marrow eosinophils were lower in del(16q) than inv(16). Deletion of CBFB but not CBFB-MYH11 rearrangement was confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization or reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in 14 of 14 del(16q) patients. The median overall survival was shorter in del(16q) than in inv(16) patients (12 vs 94 months, log rank P = .0002).

CONCLUSIONS

Myeloid neoplasms with isolated del(16q) with deletion of the CBFB but lacking CBFB-MYH11 rearrangement should not be considered a variant of the AML-defining inv(16).

Molecular Basis and Targeted Inhibition of CBFβ-SMMHC Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by recurrent chromosomal rearrangements that encode for fusion proteins which drive leukemia initiation and maintenance. The inv(16) (p13q22) rearrangement is a founding mutation and the associated CBFβ-SMMHC fusion protein is essential for the survival of inv(16) AML cells. This Chapter will discuss our understanding of the function of this fusion protein in disrupting hematopoietic homeostasis and creating pre-leukemic blasts, in its cooperation with other co-occurring mutations during leukemia initiation, and in leukemia maintenance. In addition, this chapter will discuss the current approaches used for the treatment of inv(16) AML and the recent development of AI-10-49, a selective targeted inhibitor of CBFβ-SMMHC/RUNX1 binding, the first candidate targeted therapy for inv(16) AML.

Prognostic Importance of C-KIT Mutations in Core Binding Factor Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is defined as leukemic blast reproduction in bone marrow. Chromosomal abnormalities form different subgroups with joint clinical specifications and results. t(8;21)(q22;q22) and inv(16)(p13;q22) form core binding factor-AML (CBF-AML). c-kit mutation activation occurs in 12.8-46.1% of adults with CBF leukemia. These mutations occur in 20-25% of t(8;21) and 30% of inv(16) cases.

METHODS

In this systematic review, we searched different databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Selected articles were measured based on the inclusion criteria of this study and initially compared in terms of titles or abstracts. Finally, articles relevant to the subject of this review were retrieved in full text. Twenty-two articles matched the inclusion criteria and were selected for this review.

RESULTS

In this study, c-kit mutations were associated with poor prognosis in AML patients with t(8;21) and inv(16). In addition, these mutations had better prognostic effects on AML patients with inv(16) compared with those with t(8;21).

CONCLUSION

According to the results of this study, c-kit mutations have intense, harmful effects on the relapse and white blood cell increase in CBF-AML adults. However, these mutations have no significant prognostic effects on patients.

Relapsed childhood acute myeloid leukemia patient with inversion of chromosome 16 harboring a low FLT3 internal tandem duplication allelic burden and KIT mutations

Inversion of chromosome 16 [inv(16)] has a good prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but additional genetic aberrations influence the outcome. We herein describe the case of a 15-year-old Japanese boy with inv(16) harboring a low-allelic burden internal tandem duplication of FLT3 (FLT3-ITD) and KIT mutations. Conventional chemotherapy eradicated a clone with a low-allelic burden FLT3-ITD mutation, although another clone with a KIT mutation occurred 17 months later. Further investigation is necessary to identify AML with inv(16) conferring poor prognosis, to facilitate appropriate treatment with additional drugs, such as dasatinib or gemtuzumab ozogamicin.

Single cell genotyping of exome sequencing-identified mutations to characterize the clonal composition and evolution of inv(16) AML in a CBL mutated clonal hematopoiesis

We recently described the development of an inv(16) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in a CBL mutated clonal hematopoiesis. Here, we further characterized the clonal composition and evolution of the AML based on the genetic information from the bulk specimen and analyses of individual bone marrow cells for mutations in CAND1, PTPRT, and DOCK6. To control for allele dropout, heterozygous polymorphisms located close to the respective mutation loci were assessed in parallel. The clonal composition concluded from exome sequencing suggested a proliferation advantage associated with the acquisition of mutations in CAND1, PTPRT, and DOCK6. Out of 102 single cell sequencing reactions on these mutations and the respective polymorphisms, analyses yielded conclusive results for at least 2 mutation sites in 12 cells. The single cell genotyping not only confirmed the co-occurrence of the PTPRT, CAND1 and DOCK6 mutations in the same AML clone but also revealed a clonal hierarchy, as the PTPRT mutation was likely acquired after the CAND1 and DOCK6 mutations. This insight had not been possible based solely on the exome sequencing data and suggests that the mutation in PTPRT, which encodes a STAT3-inhibiting protein tyrosine phosphatase, contributed to the AML development at a later stage by enhancing proliferation.

Long-term remission of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia with a new t(11;18)(q23;q21.2) translocation and KMT2A-ME2 (MLL-ME2) fusion gene

We describe a unique case of a woman with acute myeloid leukemia with a new, previously undescribed translocation, t(11;18)(q23;q21.2), affecting the KMT2A (MLL) gene and resulting in an KMT2A(MLL)-ME2 fusion. This disease occurred secondarily following chemotherapy for a different acute myeloid leukemia with the recurrent genetic abnormality inv(16)(p13.1;q22). The secondary leukemia was treated with intensive chemotherapy without allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Complete remission lasting more than 10 years has been achieved with concurrent and sustained remission of the primary leukemia.

Prevalence and prognostic significance of c-KIT mutations in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: a comprehensive large-scale study from a single Chinese center

To clarify the prevalence and prognostic significance of c-KIT mutations in patients with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML), a total of 351 patients who were categorized as pediatric t(8;21), adult t(8;21), pediatric inv(16), or adult inv(16) were screened at diagnosis for c-KIT mutations in exons 17 and 8 using direct sequencing. A total of 250 patients underwent follow-up. Overall, 36.5% of the patients had a c-KIT mutation. Adult t(8;21) and inv(16) patients had mutations predominantly in exons 17 and 8, respectively. Higher White blood cell (WBC) count, WBC index, and AML1-ETO transcript levels in adult t(8;21) patients were significantly associated with c-KIT mutations and mutations in exon 17 (P≤0.030). c-KIT mutations in adult t(8;21) patients were significantly correlated with a high cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR, P=0.0070) at 2 years and a low 2-year disease-free survival (DFS, P=0.013) and overall survival (OS, P=0.0055). However, no significant difference was revealed in the effect of c-KIT mutations on outcome of adult inv(16) and pediatric t(8;21) patients (all P>0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that c-KIT mutation is an independent prognostic factor for relapse, DFS, and OS (P≤0.016) in adult t(8;21) AML patients. Therefore, with regard to c-KIT mutation, CBF-AML is a heterogeneous disease. c-KIT mutations have a strong adverse effect on the relapse and survival of adult t(8;21) AML patients.

Blasts-more than meets the eye: evaluation of post-induction day 21 bone marrow in CBFB rearranged acute leukemia

Induction chemotherapy is often the first therapeutic intervention for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Evaluation of post induction bone marrow provides critical information for clinical management; in general increased blast countsor increased marrow cellularity is an ominous sign, suggestive of ineffective therapy, and may warrant additional rounds of chemotherapy. However, increased blasts alone are not necessarily predictive of recurrent/persistent disease. Here we report a very unusual observation in a case of AML with a core binding factor beta (CBFB) rearrangement. In this case the day 21 post-induction marrow biopsy showed a high blast count (approximately 20%), however,subsequent fluorescence in-situ hybridization studies were negative for CBFB rearrangement. We compared this finding to post-induction marrows from a series of 6 AML cases with CBFB rearrangements, none of which showed an increased blast count. This case illustrates that increased blast counts, even those comprising 20% of cells, are not de facto evidence of induction failure, and that correlation with ancillary studies such as fluorescence in-situhybridization should be used to distinguish a persistent neoplastic clone, from a brisk marrow recovery.

Characteristics of hematologic malignancies with coexisting t(9;22) and inv(16) chromosomal abnormalities

Background

The coexistence of t(9;22)(q34;q11.2) and inv(16)(p13q22) chromosomal abnormalities is extremely uncommon, and only a small number of such cases have been reported. Here, we characterized 7 cases of hematologic malignancy exhibiting t(9;22) and inv(16) coexistence.

Methods

We reviewed the cytogenetic data for hematologic malignancies treated at the Catholic Blood and Marrow Transplantation Center between January 2004 and June 2013. We identified 7 cases exhibiting t(9;22) and inv(16) coexistence. In addition, we analyzed mutations in the IKZF1, NPM1, FLT3, N-RAS, K-RAS, c-KIT, and TP53 genes.

Results

Four cases of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML; 1 chronic phase, 2 accelerated phase, and 1 blast phase) and 3 cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML; 1 de novo and 2 therapy-related) were identified. The percentages of circulating blasts and bone marrow eosinophils were higher in AML cases than in CML cases (53% vs. 5% and 30% vs. 5.5%, respectively). The proportions of each chromosomal abnormality were used along with follow-up karyotyping results to identify secondary changes. In BCR/ABL, a p210 fusion transcript was associated with CML, whereas a p190 fusion transcript was associated with AML. One patient with AML harbored 2 mutations: c-KIT D816V and TP53 E11Q. All patients except 1 with CML blast phase sustained clinical remission after treatment, which included an imatinib mesylate regimen.

Conclusion

This study shows that observations of bone marrow morphology, initial and follow-up cytogenetic studies, and karyotyping of BCR/ABL1 and CBFB/MYH11 provide valuable information for characterizing hematologic malignancies exhibiting t(9;22) and inv(16) coexistence.