Ethical uncertainty and COVID-19: exploring the lived experiences of senior physicians at a major medical centre

Ethical care in patients with Covid-19: A grounded theory

BACKGROUND

Providing ethical care during the Covid-19 pandemic has become an inevitable challenge due to facing limitations such as fear of contracting the disease, lack of equipment and emergence of ethical conflicts; So that there is no clear picture of how to provide ethical care for patients with Covid-19. The study aimed to explain the ethical care process of patients with Covid-19.

METHOD

This qualitative study was conducted in 2021-2023 using the grounded theory research method. Data were collected through conducting 21 semi-structured interviews with 19 participants (16 staff nurses, and 3 supervisor). Sampling was started purposively and continued theoretically. Data analysis was performed by the method proposed by Strauss and Corbin.

RESULTS

The results indicated that starting the process with a problem means a challenge of how to do the right or correct thing for the patient. This process is driven by the feeling of duty and inner commitment to do the right thing. The sense of responsibility or commitment is directly related to the degree of faith in a person. The actions that a nurse takes to fulfill her sense of commitment is called the faith-based behavior process. The process of behavior based on faith is done through two steps. Attaining the satisfaction of God and as well as the satisfaction of one's conscience is the nurses' ultimate goal of doing the right work and being committed.

CONCLUSION

The process of ethical care of patients with Covid-19 can be different according to the degree of faith and environmental conditions. A higher level of faith and more helpful environmental conditions, the greater the nurse's inner commitments in the first and second steps, as a result, the satisfaction of God and conscience will be greater.

Stretching oneself too thin and facing ethical challenges: Healthcare professionals' experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUNDS

Most countries are facing increased pressure on healthcare resources. A better understanding of how healthcare providers respond to new demands is relevant for future pandemics and other crises.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore what nurses and doctors in Norway reported as their main ethical challenges during two periods of the COVID-19 pandemic: February 2021 and February 2022.

RESEARCH DESIGN

A longitudinal repeated cross-sectional study was conducted in the Western health region of Norway. The survey included an open-ended question about ethical challenges among doctors and nurses in hospital departments. Free-text comments were analysed using Systematic Text Condensation and also presented in a frequency table.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Ethical approval was granted by the Regional Research Ethics Committee in Western Norway (131,421). All participants provided consent when participating in the study.

RESULTS

In 2021, 249 and in 2022, 163 healthcare professionals responded to the open-ended question. Nurses and doctors reported three main categories of ethical challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic: (1) barriers that hindered them in acting as they ethically would have wanted to do; (2) priority-setting dilemmas linked to overtreatment, transfer of resources and ranking patient needs; and (3) workload expansion threatening work-life balance and employees' health. Category one comprised of resource barriers, regulatory barriers, system barriers, and personal barriers. Regulatory barriers, especially visitor restrictions for next-of-kin, were the most frequently reported in 2021. Resource barriers, related to the increased scarcity of qualified staff, were most frequently reported in 2022. Clinicians stretched themselves thin to avoid compromising on care, diagnostics, or treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Developing clinicians' ability to handle and cope with limited healthcare resources is necessary. To foster resilience and sustainability, healthcare leaders, in collaboration with their staff, should ensure fair priority-setting and initiate reflections among doctors and nurses on what it implies to provide 'good enough' care.