A study of 25 cases of compression of the cauda equina by prolapsed intervertebral discs

Rates of Future Lumbar Fusion in Patients with Cauda Equina Syndrome Treated With Decompression

INTRODUCTION

The long-term risk of conversion to lumbar fusion is ill-defined for patients with cauda equina syndrome (CES) treated with decompression. This study aimed to identify the rates of fusion in patients with CES and compare those rates with a matched lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) group.

METHODS

Patients with CES who underwent decompression were identified in a national database and matched to control patients with LSS. The rates of conversion to fusion were identified and compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified independently associated risk factors. A subanalysis was conducted after stratifying by timing between CES diagnosis and decompression.

RESULTS

The rate of lumbar fusion in the CES cohort was 3.6% after 1 year, 6.7% after 3 years, and 7.8% after 5 years, significantly higher than the LSS control group at all time points (1 year: 1.6%, P = 0.001; 3 years: 3.0%, P < 0.001; 5 years: 3.8%, P < 0.001). CES was independently associated with increased risk of conversion to fusion (odds ratio: 2.13; 95% confidence interval: 1.56 to 2.97; P < 0.001). Surgical timing was not associated with risk of conversion to fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

After 5 years, 7.8% of patients with CES underwent fusion, a markedly higher rate compared with patients with LSS. Counseling patients with CES on this increased risk of future surgery is important for patient education and satisfaction.

Outcomes of cauda equina syndrome due to lumbar disc herniation after surgical management and the factors affecting it: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 22 studies with 852 cases

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes after surgical decompression in cauda equina syndrome (CES) and see if any preoperative patient-related factors contributed to this outcome.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in the electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Ovid. Data regarding outcome parameters from eligible studies were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effect model.

RESULTS

A total of 852 patients (492 males and 360 females), with a mean age of 44.6 ± 5.5 years from 22 studies diagnosed with cauda equina syndrome and undergoing surgical decompression, were included in the meta-analysis; however, not all studies reported every outcome. The mean follow-up period was 39.2 months, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months in all included studies. Meta-analysis showed that on long-term follow-up, 43.3% [29.1, 57.5] (n=708) of patients had persistent bladder dysfunction. Persistent bowel dysfunction was observed in 31.1% [14.7, 47.6] (n=439) cases, sensory deficit in 53.3% [37.1, 69.6] (n=519), motor weakness in 38.4% [22.4, 54.4] (n=490), and sexual dysfunction in 40.1% [28.0, 52.1] (n=411). Decompression within 48 hours of the onset of symptoms was associated with a favourable outcome in terms of bladder function with 24.6% [1.6, 50.9] (n=75) patients having persistent dysfunction, whereas 50.3% [10.3, 90.4] (n=185) of patients in studies with a mean time to decompression after 48 hours had persistent bladder dysfunction. Other factors such as speed of onset and sex of the patients were not found to significantly impact long-term bladder outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The long-term outcomes of CES after decompression are enumerated. Decompression within 48 hours of the onset of symptoms appears to result in fewer patients with persistent bladder dysfunction. However, a randomized controlled trial is required to conclusively determine whether early decompression leads to better outcomes.

Long-term rates of bladder dysfunction after decompression in patients with cauda equina syndrome

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) occurs due to compression of the lumbar and sacral nerve roots and is considered a surgical emergency. Although the condition is relatively rare, the associated morbidity can be devastating to patients. While substantial research has been conducted on the timing of treatment, the literature regarding long-term rates of bladder dysfunction in CES patients is scarce.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to identify long-term rates of bladder dysfunction in CES patients and to compare those rates to non-CES patients who underwent similar spinal decompression.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective database study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The CES cohort was comprised of 2,362 patients who underwent decompression surgery following CES diagnosis with a 5-year follow-up. These patients were matched to 9,448 non-CES control patients who underwent spinal decompression without a diagnosis of CES.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Diagnosis of bladder dysfunction, surgical procedure to address bladder dysfunction METHODS: Using the national insurance claims database, PearlDiver, CES patients who underwent decompression surgery were identified and 1:4 matched to non-CES patients who underwent similar spinal decompression surgery. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year rates of progression to a bladder dysfunction diagnosis and surgical intervention to manage bladder dysfunction were recorded. The CES and non-CES groups were compared with univariate testing, and an analysis of risk factors for bladder dysfunction was performed with multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 2,362 CES patients who underwent decompression surgery were identified and matched to 9,448 non-CES control patients. After 5 years, CES patients had a 10%-12% increased absolute risk of continued bladder dysfunction and a 0.7%-0.9% increased absolute risk of undergoing a surgical procedure for bladder dysfunction, as compared to matched non-CES patients. Multivariate analysis controlling for age, sex, obesity, tobacco use, and diabetes, identified CES as independently associated with increased 5-year risk for bladder dysfunction diagnosis (odds ratio [OR]: 1.72; 95% confidence interaval [CI] 1.56-1.89; p<.001) and procedure (OR: 1.40; 95% CI 1.07-1.81; p=.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the long-term risk for bladder dysfunction in CES patients is important for the future care and counseling of patients. Compared to non-CES patients who underwent similar spinal decompression, CES patients were observed to have a significantly higher long-term likelihood for both bladder dysfunction diagnosis and urologic surgical procedure.

A Systematic Review of the Value of a Bladder Scan in Cauda Equina Syndrome Diagnosis

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is one of the emergency conditions that can lead to devastating permanent functional disabilities, if misdiagnosed. Multiple studies have questioned the reliability of clinical assessment in diagnosing CES, whether some of the features should be considered to be potential red flags. Bladder dysfunction can reflect CE compromise. The post-void residual (PVR) volume bladder scan is useful in CES diagnosis, but to date there has been no single systematic review supporting its use. Furthermore, there is no clear cut-off point to consider PVR statistically significant. The aim of the study is to perform a systematic review of the current evidence behind the use of the PVR bladder scan as a diagnostic tool for CES diagnosis. This was a comprehensive search using Medline, PubMed and Embase. All articles included post-void bladder scans with the mentioned clear cut-off volume as a diagnostic parameter. A total of five study articles from 1955 fit with our inclusion and exclusion criteria. The total number of patients who had a bladder scan was 531. CES was confirmed in 85 cases. Bladder scan diagnosed 70 cases and excluded 327. The best results for both sensitivity and specificity in correlation with the sample of the study were for PVR more than 200 ml. Measuring the post-void urine volume using a bladder scan is an essential tool in the diagnosis of CES. There is a significant correlation between the PVR volume more than 200 ml and higher sensitivity and specificity.

Sexual and Bladder Dysfunction in Cauda Equina Syndrome: Correlation with Clinical and Urodynamic Studies

Study Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Purpose

To analyze the clinical and sphincteric outcomes and the extent of sexual dysfunction (SD) in subjects with cauda equina syndrome (CES) and to assess their correlation with patient-reported and clinical/urodynamic parameters.

Overview of Literature

Despite vast literature present for CES, extent of the problem of SD in CES patients has not received enough attention as reflected by the limited information in literature. Little is known about exact prevalence at presentation or about the recovery. A better understanding of SD and bladder dysfunction in CES secondary to lumbar disc herniation is essential as it commonly occurs in the sexually active age group.

Methods

All cases of cauda equine syndrome secondary to lumbar disc herniation were recruited. Biographical and clinical data, history, examination findings, operative variables, recovery, and SD were noted. Water cystometry and uroflowmetry were done pre- and postoperatively. The International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire and Female Sexual Function Index were used to assess SD among the men and women, respectively.

Results

A total of 43 patients with up to 2.94-year follow-up were included. Urodynamic studies were found to correlate significantly with age, days of bladder involvement, perianal numbness, and motor weakness (p<0.01). In step-wise regression analysis, perianal sensation and overall motor weakness were bladder function determinants. Bladder function recovery was directly related to the number of delay days (t=2.30, p<0.05) and with unilateral leg pain (t=2.15, p<0.05). Significant correlation between SD with age and days of bladder involvement before surgery was found (p<0.01).

Conclusions

Surgery timing is related to patient’s functional and sexual outcomes. Patients with unilateral leg pain and hypocontractile bladder have better outcomes. SD is a remarkable problem in CES.

Clinical prevalence and population incidence of serious pathologies among patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging for low back pain

BACKGROUND

In rare cases low back pain may be caused by underlying serious pathology such as fracture, malignancy, cauda equina syndrome, or spinal infection. The lack of evidence regarding either the clinical prevalence or population incidence of serious pathologies in the lumbar spine makes it difficult for clinicians to adequately assess a patient's risk of serious pathology.

PURPOSE

To determine the prevalence of serious pathologies in patients with low back pain who have been referred for a lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by a specialist in a private secondary care or public tertiary care setting. The incidence of these serious pathologies in the geographic region of South Auckland, New Zealand was also investigated.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, observational cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Consecutive patients referred for lumbar MRI over a 10-month period (1st of October 2013-31st of July 2014).

METHOD

Data from all eligible MRI reports was analyzed and any serious pathologies were identified and recorded. Prevalence (along with 95% confidence intervals) was calculated as a percentage of the study population. Prevalence specific to private secondary care and public tertiary care settings was also calculated and prevalence rate ratios were determined to allow comparison between settings. Incidence in the geographic region of South Auckland, New Zealand, was determined using data collected from participants recruited from the regional public hospital. Population incidence with respect to age, gender, and ethnicity for each target condition was calculated and incidence rate ratios were computed to compare groups.

RESULTS

A total of 2,383 participants referred for lumbar MRI scans were included in this study. Prevalence was significantly higher in the public tertiary care setting than in the private secondary care setting for all pathologies investigated in this study. Pathology specific prevalence in secondary care vs tertiary care settings was: malignancy, 0.3%, 4.4% (p<.001); fracture 2.2%, 6.7% (p<.001); cauda equina compression 0.6%, 2.3% (p=.001); infection 0.1%, 3.4% (p<.001). The combined prevalence in secondary care was 3.2% and in tertiary care 14.8% (p<.001). Pathology specific total incidence was: fracture, 13 per 100,000 person-years (p-y); malignancy 8.5 per 100,000 p-y; cauda equina compression 4.4 per 100,000 p-y; spinal infection 6.6 per 100,000 p-y.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of serious pathologies was significantly higher in tertiary care (public health) than in private secondary care settings. One in every 6.5 patients referred for MRI in tertiary care demonstrated structural abnormalities associated with serious pathology, which raises the question of whether access to MRI should be re-evaluated.

Time Factor and Disc Herniation Size: Are They Really Predictive for Outcome of Urinary Dysfunction in Patients With Cauda Equina Syndrome?

BACKGROUND

Timing of surgery and the importance of the size of disc prolapse in cauda equina syndrome (CES) remain controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether there is a relationship between postoperative urinary function, preoperative duration of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD), and the level of canal compromise.

METHODS

Seventy-one patients operated for CES were prospectively identified between 2010 and 2013. Fifty-two cases with preoperative NLUTD were included. The "Prolapse: Canal ratio" (PCR) was calculated as a proportion of cross-sectional area of disc prolapse on total cross-sectional area of spinal canal.

RESULTS

Median of preoperative duration of NLUTD was 72 h (48; 132) and period from first assessment to surgery 10.5 h (7; 18.5). Urinary incontinence was seen in 46.2% of patients, 38.4% had painless retention and 15.4% had painful retention. In 38.5% of cases, urinary symptoms persisted for more than 20 mo postoperatively. There was no correlation between duration of preoperative NLUTD and urinary dysfunction persistence (P = .921). The outcome was not significantly influenced by having surgery more than the 48 h after presentation (P = .135). Preoperative incontinence persisted in 58% and painless retention in 30% of cases. The mean PCR was 0.6 ± 0.18. There was no correlation between PCR and outcome (P = .537) even after adjusting for duration of preoperative NLUTD (P = .7264).

CONCLUSION

No significant correlation was demonstrated between the preoperative duration of urinary dysfunction, the size of disc herniation relative to size of spinal canal, and postoperative urinary function in a large consecutive series of patients with CES.

Evaluation and management of cauda equina syndrome in the emergency department

BACKGROUND

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) may be a devastating disease with the potential for significant patient morbidity. It is essential for emergency clinicians to be aware of how to effectively diagnose and manage this condition.

OBJECTIVE

This article provides a narrative review of the diagnosis and management of CES for the emergency clinician.

DISCUSSION

Cauda equina syndrome is a rare but emergent condition associated with back pain. It can result in severe morbidity and can be due to a variety of causes, most commonly vertebral disc protrusion. Diagnosis is often delayed, which may result in a poor prognosis. Red flags and findings consistent with CES include bilateral neurogenic sciatica, reduced perineal sensation, altered bladder function leading to painless urinary retention, loss of anal tone, and loss of sexual function. In isolation, history and examination findings demonstrate poor sensitivity. Symptoms may occur either suddenly or gradually, and most patients do not present with all of these symptoms. Postvoid bladder volume assessments can assist in the evaluation, but the diagnosis typically involves magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography myelography if MRI is not available. Treatment relies upon surgical consultation and operative intervention for decompression.

CONCLUSION

Cauda equina syndrome can be a difficult diagnosis. However, knowledge of the history and examination findings, imaging, and treatment can assist the emergency clinician in optimizing management of this condition.

National Survey of Bladder and Gastrointestinal Dysfunction in People with Spinal Cord Injury

Small-scale studies indicate that spinal cord injury (SCI) may lead to significant gastrointestinal and bladder dysfunction. However, how the prevalence of chronic disease related to these dysfunctions compares with non-SCI individuals and whether there are robust relationships to level and severity of injury are still unclear. Here, our goal was to provide high-level evidence on the association between bladder and gastrointestinal dysfunction and SCI using population-level data from the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) and the SCI Community Survey. Data from more than 60,000 individuals in the 2010 CCHS and 1500 individuals with SCI from the SCI Community Survey were analyzed. We used bi-variable and multi-variable logistic regression to examine relationships between explanatory and outcome variables. We found that SCI was associated with increased odds of urinary incontinence (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 5.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.4-7.1), bowel disorders (aOR = 2.3, CI: 1.5-3.4), as well as gastric ulcers (aOR: 3.3, CI: 2.1-4.8), even after adjusting for key confounding variables. Additionally, we found that complete SCI was associated with increased odds of urinary tract infections (aOR = 2.0, CI: 1.6-2.5) and bowel incontinence (aOR = 2.1, CI: 1.7-2.6). Individuals with SCI are at increased odds for having bladder and gastrointestinal dysfunction, certain aspects of which are dependent on the level and severity of injury. Targeted intervention and prevention strategies to manage bladder and bowel problems after SCI should be a priority for both caregivers and policy makers.

Cauda equina syndrome due to disk herniation: Long-term functional prognosis

OBJECTIVE

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) caused by lumbar disk extrusion is classically considered an indication of urgent surgery. CES can be subdivided into CESI (incomplete CES) and CESR (complete CES with urinary retention and incontinence). This paper evaluates the long-term functional outcome of a CES cohort operated on due to disk herniation.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective observational study. CES patients due to disk herniation that underwent surgery between 2000 and 2016 were included in the study. Demographic data, time intervals to diagnosis and surgery, preoperative neurologic status and outcome at the end of follow up were recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were included (median age 44 years). Eight patients were CESR and 14 CESI. Median time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 78h (range, 12-720h), and from diagnosis to surgery 24h (range, 5-120h). Median follow up was 75 months (range, 20-195 months). At the end of follow up, in the CESR group (median time from diagnosis to surgery, 23h) only pain significantly improved after surgery (p=0.007). In the CESI group (median time from diagnosis to surgery 23h) low back pain, sciatica and urinary sphincter function significantly improved (p<0.001). There were no significant differences between early (<48h) operation (n=4) and late (n=18) in terms of sphincter recovery (Fisher's Exact Test, p=0.076).

CONCLUSION

Pain associated to CES improved both in the CESI and CESR groups. However, urinary sphincter impairment significantly improved only in the CESI group. No significant differences were found regarding long-term functional outcome between early and late surgery.

Quantifying the clinical aspects of the cauda equina syndrome - The Cauda Scale (TCS)

AIM

To quantify the clinical findings in patients with potential cauda equina syndrome (CES).

METHODS

Three domains were selected: bladder function (B), perianal sensation (S) and anal tone/squeeze (T). A quantified score was given to symptoms and signs in each domain.

RESULTS

The lowest score in each domain and the lowest sum score (the most severe lesion) is 0. The best sum score is 9 (the normal patient).

CONCLUSION

TCS can improve the clinical assessment and management of patients with possible CES and improve communication between the doctors who are called upon to assess and treat such patients.

Cauda Equina Syndrome Due to Lumbar Disc Herniation: a Review of Literature

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare neurologic condition that is caused by compression of the cauda equina. Cauda equina consists of spinal nerves L2-L5, S1-S5 and the coccygeal nerve. The compression of these nerve roots can be caused mainly by lumbar disc herniation (45% of all causes). The diagnosis consists of two critical points: a) detailed history and physical examination and b) MRI or CT. The gold standard of the treatment of this syndrome is the surgical approach in combination with the timing of onset of symptoms. The surgery as an emergency situation is recommended in the fi rst 48 hours of onset of symptoms. Any delay in diagnosis and treatment leads to a poor prognosis of CES.

Lumbar spinal canal MRI diameter is smaller in herniated disc cauda equina syndrome patients

Introduction

Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical features in cauda equina syndrome (CES) is unknown; nor is known whether there are differences in MRI spinal canal size between lumbar herniated disc patients with CES versus lumbar herniated discs patients without CES, operated for sciatica. The aims of this study are 1) evaluating the association of MRI features with clinical presentation and outcome of CES and 2) comparing lumbar spinal canal diameters of lumbar herniated disc patients with CES versus lumbar herniated disc patients without CES, operated because of sciatica.

Methods

MRIs of CES patients were assessed for the following features: level of disc lesion, type (uni- or bilateral) and severity of caudal compression. Pre- and postoperative clinical features (micturition dysfunction, defecation dysfunction, altered sensation of the saddle area) were retrieved from the medical files. In addition, anteroposterior (AP) lumbar spinal canal diameters of CES patients were measured at MRI. AP diameters of lumbar herniated disc patients without CES, operated for sciatica, were measured for comparison.

Results

48 CES patients were included. At MRI, bilateral compression was seen in 82%; complete caudal compression in 29%. MRI features were not associated with clinical presentation nor outcome. AP diameter was measured for 26 CES patients and for 31 lumbar herniated disc patients without CES, operated for sciatica. Comparison displayed a significant smaller AP diameter of the lumbar spinal canal in CES patients (largest p = 0.002). Compared to average diameters in literature, diameters of CES patients were significantly more often below average than that of the sciatica patients (largest p = 0.021).

Conclusion

This is the first study demonstrating differences in lumbar spinal canal size between lumbar herniated disc patients with CES and lumbar herniated disc patients without CES, operated for sciatica. This finding might imply that lumbar herniated disc patients with a relative small lumbar spinal canal might need to be approached differently in managing complaints of herniated disc. Since the number of studied patients is relatively small, further research should be conducted before clinical consequences are considered.

The long term outcome of micturition, defecation and sexual function after spinal surgery for cauda equina syndrome

BACKGROUND

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare neurologic complication of lumbar herniated disc for which emergency surgical decompression should be undertaken. Despite the common belief that the restoration of functions that are affected by CES can take several years postoperatively, follow up seldom exceeds the first year after surgery. Long term outcome of especially micturition, defecation and sexual function-which are by definition affected in CES-are unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate 1) postoperative long term outcome of micturition, defecation and sexual function in CES patients 2) attitude of patients towards received hospital care with regard to (recovery of) these functions.

METHODS

CES patients were selected by screening the records of all patients operated on lumbar herniated disc in our university hospital between 1995-2010. A questionnaire was sent to the selected CES patients evaluating current complaints of micturition, defecation and sexual function and attitude towards delivered care with focus on micturition, defecation and sexual function.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven of 66 eligible CES patients were included (response rate 71%, inclusion rate 56%). Median time after surgery was 13.8 years (range 5.8-21.8 years). Dysfunction at follow up was highly prevalent: 38% micturition dysfunction, 43% defecation dysfunction and 54% sexual dysfunction. Younger age at presentation was associated with sexual dysfunction at follow up: for every year younger at presentation, odds ratio for sexual dysfunction at follow up was 1.11 (p = 0.035). Other associations with outcome were not identified. Two-third of the CES patients wished their neurosurgeon had given them more prognostic information about micturition, defecation and sexual function.

CONCLUSION

The presented data demonstrate that dysfunction of micturition, defecation and sexual function are still highly prevalent in a large number of CES patients even years postoperatively. These alarming follow up data probably have a devastating effect on personal perceived quality of life, which should be studied in more detail. CES patients communicate a clear demand for more prognostic information. The presented figures enable clinicians to inform their CES patients more realistically about long term postoperative outcome of micturition, defecation and sexual function after surgical intervention.

Dorsal Lumbar Disc Migrations with Lateral and Ventral Epidural Extension on Axial MRI: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

Dorsal epidural migration of lumbar disc extrusion is rare and commonly misdiagnosed. Our purpose was to retrospectively analyze soft-tissue abnormalities on axial MR imaging in both the ventral and lateral epidural space in such dorsal epidural migrations. The presence of each component required complete concordance by 3 independent neuroradiologist readers. In a case series (n = 6) of surgically proved dorsal lumbar disc migrations, in which the radiologist's favored prospective diagnosis had not been correct, each case demonstrated epidural soft-tissue abnormality that had components both laterally and ventrally, abutting the parent disc. Similarly, in previously published cases for which axial MR imaging was available, the lateral component was demonstrated in 23/24 cases (96%). Ventral abutment of the parent disc was evident, in addition, in 17/18 cases (94%) with available disc-level axial images. Both ventral and lateral epidural soft-tissue abnormalities are typically present in dorsal lumbar disc herniations and may help radiologists suggest this rare diagnosis in appropriate cases.

Treatment of cauda equina syndrome caused by lumbar disc herniation with percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy

To evaluate the feasibility and clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) for cauda equina syndrome (CES) caused by disc herniation. 16 patients with CES caused by LDH at the early and middle stages of Shi's classification were selected as the objects of study, who underwent PELD. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Macnab criteria and the visual analogue scale (VAS). The VAS for leg pain and back pain significantly decreased from preoperative scores of 7.67 ± 1.23 and 7.52 ± 1.42, respectively, to postoperative scores of 1.71 ± 0.53 and 3.18 ± 0.72. Thirteen patients showed favorable results. Complications included one patient of motor weakness, and one patient developed an ipsilateral recurrent herniation who finally acquired satisfactory result after reoperation. Hence, PELD could be used as an alternative surgical method for the treatment of CES in properly selected cases and appropriate patient selection and a reasonable surgical approach will give rise to better outcomes.

Cauda equina syndrome

There is no universally agreed definition of cauda equina syndrome (CES). Clinical signs of CES including direct rectal examination (DRE) do not reliably correlate with cauda equina (CE) compression on MRI. Clinical assessment only becomes reliable if there are symptoms/signs of late, often irreversible, CES. The only reliable way of including or excluding CES is to perform MRI on all patients with suspected CES. If the diagnosis is being considered, MRI should ideally be performed locally in the District General Hospitals within one hour of the question being raised irrespective of the hour or the day. Patients with symptoms and signs of CES and MRI confirmed CE compression should be referred to the local spinal service for emergency surgery.

CES can be subdivided by the degree of neurological deficit (bilateral radiculopathy, incomplete CES or CES with retention of urine) and also by time to surgical treatment (12, 24, 48 or 72 hour). There is increasing understanding that damage to the cauda equina nerve roots occurs in a continuous and progressive fashion which implies that there are no safe time or deficit thresholds. Neurological deterioration can occur rapidly and is often associated with longterm poor outcomes. It is not possible to predict which patients with a large central disc prolapse compressing the CE nerve roots are going to deteriorate neurologically nor how rapidly. Consensus guidelines from the Society of British Neurological Surgeons and British Association of Spinal Surgeons recommend decompressive surgery as soon as practically possible which for many patients will be urgent/emergency surgery at any hour of the day or night.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1390–4

Disorders of the cauda equina

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cauda equina syndrome is an important neurologic disorder characterized by lower back pain, sciatica, perineal numbness, and sphincter dysfunction. This article reviews the anatomy, clinical presentation, evaluation, and treatment of cauda equina dysfunction, focusing on diskogenic cauda equina syndrome.

RECENT FINDINGS

Assessment of suspected cauda equina syndrome is hampered by modest diagnostic accuracy of any one clinical feature. Although urgent operation for diskogenic cauda equina syndrome is standard practice, most data about timing of intervention comes from small case series; however, randomized trials are very unlikely given the ethical implications of delaying surgical intervention.

SUMMARY

In the absence of high-quality data indicating otherwise, urgent evaluation and intervention are required for diskogenic cauda equina syndrome. Other etiologies of cauda equina dysfunction including neoplastic, infectious, and iatrogenic causes must also be considered, especially in the setting of normal neuroimaging studies.

Neurological deterioration in cauda equina syndrome is probably progressive and continuous. Implications for clinical management

Fifty-six human and animal studies of cauda equina syndrome (CES) were reviewed. The evidence from human studies was poor (level IV). Evidence from animal studies and limited evidence from human studies suggest that structural and functional neurological losses are a progressive, continuous process. The longer the cauda equina nerve roots are compressed the greater the harm and the poorer the extent of recovery. This should prompt diagnosis and surgery for all CES patients as soon as practicably possible.

Assessment of cauda equina syndrome progression pattern to improve diagnosis

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis of individual patient data.

OBJECTIVE

To date, the progression pattern of cauda equina syndrome (CES) has not been summarized. This study assessed individual patient data from CES cases, investigated the CES progression pattern to help clinicians provide timely diagnoses.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Because there were few randomized controlled trials about CES, our research was based on case reports of CES with detailed medical history.

METHODS

We searched English literature regarding CES in the PubMed database. We included a total of 198 publications involving 264 cases that met the inclusion criteria. The occurrence order of symptoms was determined by reviewing patients' medical histories, and the progression pattern of CES was analyzed using sequential pattern mining. Finally, we summarized and reassessed the current timing of CES diagnosis.

RESULTS

Result of sequential pattern mining demonstrated that the progression process of CES could be divided into 3 stages: early stage of CES (CESE), with bilateral peripheral nerve dysfunction characterized by progressive sensory-motor defects from unilateral to bilateral in lower extremities; incomplete CES, with reduction of sphincter functions; and CES in retention, with sphincter dysfunction. Among all the cases, 81.08% (180 cases) were diagnosed at the stage of incomplete CES or CES in retention, in which 99.4% (179 cases) had experienced CESE without being diagnosed.

CONCLUSION

The characteristic progressive sensory-motor CESE defects in lower extremities marked CES onset. Instead of waiting for the onset of sphincter function abnormalities, CES should be diagnosed when the CESE symptoms manifest.

Efficacy of delayed decompression of lumbar disk herniation causing cauda equina syndrome

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare but serious neurosurgical emergency that can have devastating long-lasting neurologic consequences. Compression of the cauda equina can result in paralysis of bowel and bladder function. Such compression has been considered the only absolute indication for surgery in cases of lumbar disk disease. Therefore, it is extremely important that physicians be aware of the condition so that a surgeon is consulted before neurological damage becomes permanent. This article reports the results of delayed surgical decompression in cases of lumbar disk herniation with CES. The study group comprised 14 patients (11 men and 3 women) with a mean age of 48 years (range, 36-57 years). Clinical presentation was chronic low back pain, sciatica, and impaired sphincter function. All patients had a fenestration at the affected level and site, and the disk fragments were excised and the disk space cleared. The surgeries were performed 1 to 3 months after onset of sphinctric disturbance. Postoperatively, all patients were relieved of back and/or leg pain and showed sensory improvement. Twelve patients regained full control of urination and defecation. Lower extremity strength improved in 9 patients. The classical presentation of CES is not obvious. Even if surgery is performed late due to delayed presentation, significant improvement in neurologic and bladder function can still be expected.

Timing of surgical intervention in cauda equina syndrome: a systematic critical review

OBJECTIVE

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare but important neurosurgical emergency. Despite being a recognized clinical entity since 1934, there remains significant uncertainty in the literature regarding the urgency for surgical intervention. The past decade has seen the emergence of the much-referred-to 48-hour limit as a possible window of safety. The ramifications of this time point are significant for early patients who may subsequently have urgent treatment delayed, and for litigation cases, after which adverse decisions are more likely to occur.

METHODS

A systematic principally qualitative review of the animal and human clinical literature is presented, examining the evidence for urgent surgical decompression in CES and the much-quoted 48-hour rule.

RESULTS

There is significant discordance in the literature regarding whether emergency surgery improves outcomes; however, a growing consensus is the acknowledgment that biologic systems deteriorate in a continuous rather than stepwise manner. Level of neurological dysfunction at surgery (incomplete CES vs. CES with retention) is probably the most significant determinant of prognosis. Onset and duration of symptoms also are likely to have an impact, if not on overall outcome then at least on duration of neurological recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no strong basis to support 48 hours as a blanket safe time point to delay surgery. Both early and delayed surgery may result in improved neurological outcomes. However, it is likely that the earlier the surgical intervention, the more beneficial the effects for compressed nerves, especially with acute neurological compromise.

Serious Adverse Events and Spinal Manipulative Therapy of the Low Back Region: A Systematic Review of Cases

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to systematically search the literature for studies reporting serious adverse events following lumbopelvic spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) and to describe the case details.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library up to January 12, 2012, by an experienced reference librarian. Study selection was performed by 2 independent reviewers using predefined criteria. We included cases involving individuals 18 years or older who experienced a serious adverse event following SMT applied to the lumbar spine or pelvis by any type of provider (eg, chiropractic, medical, physical therapy, osteopathic, layperson). A serious adverse event was defined as an untoward occurrence that results in death or is life threatening, requires hospital admission, or results in significant or permanent disability. We included studies published in English, German, Dutch, and Swedish.

RESULTS

A total of 2046 studies were screened, and 41 studies reporting on 77 cases were included. Important case details were frequently unreported, such as descriptions of SMT technique, the pre-SMT presentation of the patient, the specific details of the adverse event, time from SMT to the adverse event, factors contributing to the adverse event, and clinical outcome. Adverse events consisted of cauda equina syndrome (29 cases, 38% of total); lumbar disk herniation (23 cases, 30%); fracture (7 cases, 9%); hematoma or hemorrhagic cyst (6 cases, 8%); or other serious adverse events (12 cases, 16%) such as neurologic or vascular compromise, soft tissue trauma, muscle abscess formation, disrupted fracture healing, and esophageal rupture.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review describes case details from published articles that describe serious adverse events that have been reported to occur following SMT of the lumbopelvic region. The anecdotal nature of these cases does not allow for causal inferences between SMT and the events identified in this review. Recommendations regarding future case reporting and research aimed at furthering the understanding of the safety profile of SMT are discussed.

Complaints of micturition, defecation and sexual function in cauda equina syndrome due to lumbar disk herniation: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare complication of lumbar disk herniation. Although micturition, defecation and/or sexual function are by definition affected, little seems to be known about long-term outcome. Aim of this study is to review current literature on outcome of micturition, defecation and sexual function in CES due to lumbar disk herniation.

METHODS

A literature search was done in Pubmed, Embase and Web of Science using a sensitive search string combination. Studies were selected by predefined selection criteria and risk of bias was assessed using a Cochrane checklist adjusted for this purpose.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were included. Risk of bias varied with six studies showing low risk. Mean minimal follow-up time was 17.0 months (range 3-24 months). All studies evaluated micturition and reported dysfunction at follow-up in 42.5% (range 13.3-90.0%). Defecation and sexual function were evaluated in eight and nine studies, respectively, and reported to be 49.6 (range 10.5-90.0%) and 44.3% (range 10.0-76.6%), respectively. Only two studies assessed sexual function in all patients at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This review offers an insight into the extent of micturition dysfunction, defecation dysfunction and sexual dysfunction (SD) in CES after decompression. Our findings show that dysfunction is extremely common, even at long-term follow-up. A condition as invalidating as CES requires proper patient information and the outcomes presented here may help in providing those data. Bias in included studies, lack of universal definitions and incomplete follow-up results qualify these data as the best we momentarily have, but still subject to improvement. Since SD seems to be severely underreported, we recommend further research to explore the extent of this problem, as well as the use of questionnaires in future clinical (prospective) studies to accomplish a more patient-based approach.

Delayed presentation of cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar disc herniation: functional outcomes and health-related quality of life

OBJECTIVE

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a feared complication of lumbar disc herniation. It is generally accepted that CES requires decompression within 6 hours of symptom onset, but this time goal is rarely met, and the relative benefit of delayed decompression on functional status and quality of life (QOL) remains unknown. The study objective was to describe the functional status and quality of life outcomes for patients who undergo delayed surgical decompression for CES.

METHODS

Patients with CES who underwent decompression of a herniated lumbar disc during a 10-year period were assessed at hospital discharge and at least 4 months after the procedure. Evaluation of functional outcomes was based on a previously validated scale and QOL outcomes on the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1100 patients with herniated discs were identified, and 14 underwent surgical decompression for CES. All 14 had had symptoms for more than 38 hours before surgery. Ten patients were available for long-term follow-up. There was a strong correlation between long CES symptom duration and poor functional outcome: of 8 patients with symptoms for less than 10 days before decompression (range, 1.6-7.5 d), all had good functional outcomes. The 2 patients with more prolonged symptoms (10.6 and 14.2 d) had poor outcomes. SF-36 scores demonstrated declines in physical roles (p = 0.03), social function (p = 0.03) and increased pain (p = 0.003) compared with population norms. Correlation between SF-36 domain scores and CES symptom duration failed to achieve statistical significance, perhaps because of small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who undergo delayed decompression for CES have increased pain and impaired social and physical function. Longer delays correlate with worse functional outcomes. Beyond 24 hours, decompression delay may be associated with a poorer quality of life but, because of the rarity of CES, the sample size in this study was too small to provide definitive conclusions. Since no patients underwent surgery within 38.4 hours of symptoms, it is not possible to comment on the importance of emergent decompression in early presenters.

Current management review of thoracolumbar cord syndromes

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Injuries to the thoracolumbar spine may lead to a complex array of clinical syndromes that result from dysfunction of the anterior motor units, lumbosacral nerve roots, and/or spinal cord. Neurologic dysfunction may manifest in the lower extremities as loss of fine and gross motor function, touch, pain, temperature, and proprioceptive and vibratory sense deficits. Two clinical syndromes sometimes associated with these injuries are conus medullaris syndrome (CMS) and cauda equina syndrome (CES).

PURPOSE

To review the current management of thoracolumbar spinal cord injuries.

STUDY DESIGN

Literature review.

METHODS

Index Medicus was used to search the primary literature for articles on thoracolumbar injuries. An emphasis was placed on the current management, controversies, and newer treatment options.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

After blunt trauma, these syndromes may reflect a continuum of dysfunction rather than a distinct clinical entity. The transitional anatomy at the thoracolumbar junction, where the conus medullaris is present, makes it less likely that a "pure" CMS or CES syndrome will occur and more likely that a "mixed" injury will. Surgical decompression is the mainstay of treatment for incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) and incomplete CMS and CES. The value of timing of surgical intervention in the setting of incomplete SCI is unclear at this time. This review summarizes the recent information on epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and controversies in the management of thoracolumbar neurologic injury syndromes.

Is Cauda Equina Syndrome Being Treated Within the Recommended Time Frame?

BACKGROUND:

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare but devastating medical condition requiring urgent surgery to halt or reverse neurological compromise. Controversy exists as to how soon surgery must be performed after diagnosis, and clinical and medicolegal factors make this question highly relevant to the spine surgeon. It is unclear from the literature how often CES patients are treated within the recommended time frame.

OBJECTIVE:

To determine whether CES patients are being treated in compliance with the current guideline of surgery within 48 hours and to assess incidence, demography, comorbidities, and outcome measures of CES patients.

METHODS:

We searched the 2003 to 2006 California State Inpatient Databases to identify degenerative lumbar disk disorder patients surgically treated for CES. An International Classification of Disease, ninth revision, clinical modification, diagnosis code was used to identify CES patients with advanced disease.

RESULTS:

The majority (88.74%) of California's CES patients received surgery within the recommended 48-hour window after diagnosis. The incidence of CES in surgically treated degenerative lumbar disk patients was 1.51% with an average of 397 cases per year in California. CES patients had worse outcomes and used more healthcare resources than other surgically treated degenerative lumbar disk patients; this disparity was more pronounced for patients with advanced CES. CES patients treated after 48 hours had 3 times the odds of a nonroutine discharge as patients treated within 48 hours (odds ratio = 3.082; P &lt; .001).

CONCLUSION:

In California, patients are being treated within the recommended 48-hour time frame.

Two screening tests for urinary voiding dysfunction used in 209 consecutive patients undergoing lumbar spine operations

OBJECTIVE

A study of the prevalence of urinary voiding dysfunction was carried out preoperatively in 209 patients undergoing lumbar spine operations, using two non-invasive screening tests: free uroflowmetry and ultrasound measurement of residual urine. The value of using the two urodynamic screening tests in the evaluation of a larger group of patients with sciatica from disc lesions or spinal stenosis has not been published as an article before.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 209 consecutive patients, 159 with lumbar disc lesions and 50 with lumbar spinal stenosis, the main indications for operative treatment were pain and/or somatic paresis. In preoperative interviews, information about voiding, anal and sexual functions were obtained. Then uroflowmetry was performed and the volume of residual urine was measured. In this study, the definition of normal bladder function is based on normal flow rates, the shape of the curves, normal voided volumes and the absence of significant residual urine. Bladder dysfunction differs from normal function by one, two, three or all four of these parameters.

RESULTS

Normal bladder function was found in 66 patients (31.6%). The other 143 (68.4%) had signs that could indicate sensory paresis and/or neurogenic detrusor underactivity. Seventy-nine of the 143 were also tested 3 months postoperatively. In 58% the bladder function had improved.

CONCLUSIONS

The very high prevalence of abnormal uroflowmetry and/or postvoiding residual urine suggestive of possible bladder dysfunction (68.4%) indicates that the two tests should be used routinely in cases of lumbar disc lesions and spinal stenosis. The two tests provide documentation of preoperative voiding function and a possibility of comparison with postoperative findings.

Timing of surgery in cauda equina syndrome with urinary retention: meta-analysis of observational studies

Object

The authors performed exploratory meta-analyses of observational cohort studies, evidence level III, examining whether earlier surgery makes a difference in outcome in terms of urinary function once cauda equina syndrome (CES) from a herniated lumbar disc has progressed to urinary retention (CESR).

Methods

Literature search identified 27 studies of CESR patients with clear definition of surgical timing. Relative risk (RR) could not be calculated in 11 studies, leaving 16 for meta-analysis. Urinary retention related to surgical timing at 5 breakpoints: 12, 24, 36, 48, or 72 hours. Urinary outcome was classified as Normal, Fair, or Poor. Meta-analysis was performed for “Event = Fair/Poor” or “Event = Poor.” Eight studies allowed separation into CESR and incomplete CES (CESI), and 5 of these had enough data for meta-analysis to compare CESR and CESI. A random effects meta-analysis model was used because of heterogeneity across the studies. A best-evidence synthesis was performed for the 4 largest studies that had 24- and 48-hour breakpoints.

Results

For “Event = Fair/Poor,” meta-analyses using the 5 breakpoints predicted a more likely Fair/Poor outcome for later surgery (RR range 1.77–2.19). The RR for later timing of surgery was statistically significant for 24-and 72-hour breakpoints and was elevated but not statistically significant for the other 3. For “Event = Poor,” the RR range was 1.09–5.82, statistically significant for the 36 hour breakpoint only. Meta-analysis comparing CESR patients with CESI patients predicted a Fair/Poor result for CESR (RR 2.58, 95% confidence interval 0.59–11.31). The best-evidence synthesis did not disclose reasons for differences in the results of the 4 studies.

Conclusions

This study supports early surgery for CES and indicates that CESR and CESI cases should not be analyzed together.

Cauda equina syndrome treated by surgical decompression: the influence of timing on surgical outcome

A prospective longitudinal inception cohort study of 33 patients undergoing surgery for cauda equina syndrome (CES) due to a herniated lumbar disc. To determine what factors influence spine and urinary outcome measures at 3 months and 1 year in CES specifically with regard to the timing of onset of symptoms and the timing of surgical decompression. CES consists of signs and symptoms caused by compression of lumbar and sacral nerve roots. Controversy exists regarding the relative importance of timing of surgery as a prognostic factor influencing outcome. Post-operative outcome was assessed at 3 months and 1 year using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for leg and back pain and an incontinence questionnaire. Statistical analysis was used to determine the association between pre-operative variables and these post-operative outcomes with a specific emphasis on the timing of surgery. Surgery was performed on 12 (36%) patients within 48 h of the onset of symptoms including seven patients (21%) who underwent surgery within 24 h. Follow up was achieved in 27 (82%) and 25 (76%) patients at 3 and 12 months, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in outcome between three groups of patients with respect to length of time from symptom onset to surgery- <24, 24-48 and >48 h. A significantly better outcome was found in patients who were continent of urine at presentation compared with those who were incontinent. The duration of symptoms prior to surgery does not appear to influence the outcome. This finding has significant implications for the medico-legal sequelae of this condition. The data suggests that the severity of bladder dysfunction at the time of surgery is the dominant factor in recovery of bladder function.

Chapitre D - Troubles vésico-sphinctériens et hernies discales

Lower urinary tract dysfunction related to herniated disk can raise complex diagnostic and management problems. This article reviews the two main clinical situations encountered: documented lower urinary tract dysfunction in a context of cauda equina syndrome secondary to herniated disk and lower urinary tract dysfunction representing the only clinical sign of herniated disk with no other alteration of the neurological examination. Regardless of the neurological signs, urodynamic assessment is essential to characterize any lower urinary tract dysfunction and to determine the modalities of long-term surveillance.

Cauda equina syndrome: what is the correlation between clinical assessment and MRI scanning?

The indications for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in suspected cauda equina syndrome, and the urgency for this investigation are regularly disputed. In this study we assess the ability of neurosurgical residents to predict on clinical grounds in which patients with cauda equina syndrome (CES) this was due to prolapsed intervertebral disc thereby justifying a request for urgent MR imaging.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study of all adult patients with a suspected diagnosis of cauda equina syndrome.

SETTING

A single tertiary referral neurosurgical centre.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients referred over a four month period with a suspected diagnosis of cauda equina syndrome.

RESULTS

MRI was normal in 10 (43%) patients. A disc prolapse causing cauda equina distortion was present in 5 (22%) patients. The diagnostic accuracy of urinary retention, urinary frequency, urinary incontinence, altered urinary sensation and altered perineal sensation were 0.57, 0.65, 0.61 ,0.65 and 0.60 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Because it is impossible in a significant proportion of patients to exclude the diagnosis of prolapsed intervertebral disc in the context of referral with suspected cauda equina compromise the authors recommend urgent MRI assessment in all patients who present with new onset urinary symptoms in the context of lumbar back pain or sciatica.

Delays in the treatment of cauda equina syndrome due to its variable clinical features in patients presenting to the emergency department

OBJECTIVE

To identify reasons for delay in management of patients with cauda equina syndrome (CES) and to determine commonly presented features of CES.

METHODS

Retrospectively, the presenting features and management of patients treated for CES over a 4-year period were reviewed.

RESULTS

Reasons for delay in treatment were identified in over half of the patients.

DISCUSSION

Most patients do not present with all the characteristic features of CES. Sacral sensory loss is a sensitive and relatively specific sign for diagnosing CES.

Cauda equina syndrome: factors affecting long-term functional and sphincteric outcome

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study with prospective clinical follow-up.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the factors that influence outcome after surgery for cauda equina syndrome (CES).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

CES is a rare but serious consequence of lumbar disc prolapse and can have devastating long-lasting neurologic consequences. The timing of surgical decompression remains controversial.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients with evidence of a sphincteric disturbance who underwent urgent surgery were identified and invited to follow-up. The outcome measures comprised history and examination and several validated self-assessment questionnaires.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients (78%) attended with a mean follow-up of 60 months (range, 25-114 months). Mean age at onset was 41 years (range, 24-67 years) with 23 males and 19 females. Twenty-six patients were operated on within 48 hours of onset of sphincteric symptoms; 5 of these were within 24 hours. Acute onset of sphincteric symptoms and the time to operation did not influence the outcomes. Leg weakness at onset persisted in a significant number of patients at follow-up (P < 0.005). Urinary disturbance at presentation did not affect the outcomes. At follow-up, significantly more females had urinary incontinence (P < 0.005). Bowel dysfunction at presentation was associated with sexual problems at follow-up (P < 0.005). The 13 patients who failed their post operative trial without catheter had worse outcomes. The SF-36 scores at follow-up were reduced compared with age-matched controls in the population. The mean ODI was 29, Low Back Outcome Score 42, and VAS 4.5. The time elapsed from operation to follow-up was not found to influence the outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In our series, the symptom duration before operation and the speed of onset do not affect the outcome more than 2 years after surgery. Based on the SF-36, ODI, and Low Back Outcome Scores, patients who have had CES do not return to a normal status.

Cauda equina compression syndrome in a child due to lumbar disc herniation

INTRODUCTION

Cauda equina syndrome with sphincter dysfunction is an uncommon and feared complication of lumbar disc herniation.

CASE REPORT

Lumbar disc disease in the pediatric age has been reported infrequently, but to the best of our knowledge, this is the first pediatric case of acute lumber disc herniation presenting with caudal compression.

Clinical and radiologic features of lumbar spinal stenosis and disc herniation with neuropathic bladder

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical and radiologic findings of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar disc herniation presenting with neuropathic bladder were prospectively analyzed.

OBJECTIVES

To study the relationship between the degree of cauda equina compression and prevalence of neuropathic bladder in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar disc herniation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Bladder dysfunction has frequently been noted in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar disc herniation. However, there have been few studies that have demonstrated the correlation between bladder function and the degree of stenotic compression of the cauda equina seen on radiologic findings in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar disc herniation.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients admitted for treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis or lumbar disc herniation underwent urodynamic studies, and computed tomographic scans after myelography were obtained to determine the degree of cauda equina compression. The cross-sectional area and anteroposterior diameter of the dural sac were measured at their smallest transverse area.

RESULTS

Twenty (58.8%) of the 34 patients were diagnosed with positive neuropathic bladder. There was no significant difference in the cross-sectional area of dural sac between the patients with positive neuropathic bladder and with negative neuropathic bladder. However, the dural sac anteroposterior diameter in positive neuropathic bladder patients was significantly shorter than that in patients with negative neuropathic bladder. A critical size for the dural sac of patients with neuropathic bladder was revealed as 8 mm in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of neuropathic bladder is more significantly associated with dural sac anteroposterior diameter than with the cross-sectional area of dural sac. Therefore, dural sac anteroposterior diameter might be an important factor predicting the existence of neuropathic bladder.

Urodynamic evaluation of surgical outcome in patients with urinary retention due to central lumbar disc prolapse

AIMS

To investigate whether acute urinary retention due to central lumbar disc prolapse is reversible after emergency spinal surgery.

METHODS

Eight patients (two males, six females) with a mean age of 31.5 years (range, 18-42 years) with urinary retention due to lumbar disc prolapse were studied. An emergency surgery was performed within 48 hours (mean, 42 hours) after the onset of urinary retention. Urodynamic study was performed before and after the operation.

RESULTS

All patients had acontractile detrusor without bladder sensation and four of seven patients had inactive external sphincter on electromyogram at presentation. Two patients were unable to void up to 1 and 5 months after surgery and were then lost for follow-up. The remaining six patients could void with straining or changing their voiding postures (bending forward), postoperatively. A follow-up urodynamic study was performed in all patients from 1 month to 6 years postoperatively. All patients demonstrated acontractile detrusor on cystometrogram. On external sphincter electromyogram, four patients had normal activities. The remaining four patients recovered electromyographic activities, but two of them had denervation motor unit potentials and two had low activities.

CONCLUSIONS

Bladder function was irreversible after spinal surgery, whereas urethral function showed a better recovery in patients with acute urinary retention due to central lumbar disc prolapse. However, most of our patients could empty their bladder only by straining or changing their voiding postures postoperatively.

Cauda equina syndrome: outcome and implications for management

A retrospective review of all patients who had surgery for cauda equina syndrome (CES) due to a herniated lumbar disc between January 1996 and November 1999 was undertaken. All underwent laminectomy and discectomy, and had been admitted as emergencies with cauda equina syndrome. Ten women and 10 men with a mean age of 45 years (range 33-67) had their diagnosis verified with MRI in 19 cases and CT in one case. Only half the patients had been catheterized at the time of admission to the neurosurgical unit. Nine patients had emergency decompressive surgery within 5 h of presentation to our unit. The others had surgery on the next available list, but within 24 h of admission. No difference was found between urgently operated patients and those operated on the next available list when urological outcome and quality of life assessments were made using a validated questionnaire at a mean time of 16 months after surgery (range10-48). Twenty per cent of a control group who had undergone laminectomy and discectomy for large disc herniations, but without CES had new urological symptoms when questioned postoperatively, but similar quality of life status. Emergency decompressive surgery did no significantly improve outcome in CBS compared with a delayed approach.

Surgical management of spinal stenosis

Proper patient selection is the key to successful surgical management. The presence of the appropriate symptoms, signs and imaging findings--along with the individual psychologic and socioeconomic factors--play a significant role in the selection process. Patient education is important so that the patient's expectations from surgery are aligned with the surgeon's expectations. When the patient has been properly selected, and there has been adherence to the decision-making principles, along with meticulous surgical technique, good outcomes can be expected with surgical management of patients with spinal stenosis.

Cauda equina syndrome caused by intervertebral lumbar disk prolapse: mid-term results of 22 patients and literature review

This retrospective study analyzes the mid-term results of 22 patients who underwent diskectomy following a diagnosis of cauda equina syndrome due to prolapsed intervertebral lumbar disks (mean follow-up: 3 years and 9 months). Postoperatively, 17 of 22 patients had complete urinary function recovery within the follow-up period, 4 patients had a persistent stress incontinence, and 1 patient, incontinent 4 years postoperatively, required catheterization. Thirteen of 17 patients had recovery of motor deficits, 14 of 21 of sensory deficits, and 13 of 15 patients regained perianal sensation. There was no statistically significant difference concerning the time between onset of symptoms and surgical decompression and subsequent outcome. Complete evaluation must include imaging and urodynamic investigations. After an accurate diagnosis and adequate operative treatment, postoperative results of cauda equina syndrome appear satisfactory.

Cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis of surgical outcomes

STUDY DESIGN

A meta-analysis of surgical outcomes of cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar disc herniation.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relationship between time to decompression after onset of cauda equina syndrome and clinical outcome, and to identify preoperative variables that were associated with outcomes.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The timing of surgical decompression for cauda equina syndrome is controversial. Although most surgeons recommend emergent decompression, results in certain studies show that delayed surgery may provide a satisfactory outcome.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was performed to determine the correlation between timing of decompression and clinical outcome. One hundred four citations were reviewed, and 42 met the inclusion criteria. Preoperative and postoperative data were recorded. Length of time to surgery was broken down into five groups: less than 24 hours, 24-48 hours, 2-10 days, 11 days to 1 month, and more than 1 month. Logistic regression was used to determine the association between preoperative variables and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Outcomes were analyzed in 322 patients. Preoperative chronic back pain was associated with poorer outcomes in urinary and rectal function, and preoperative rectal dysfunction was associated with worsened outcome in urinary continence. In addition, increasing age was associated with poorer postoperative sexual function. No significant improvement in surgical outcome was identified with intervention less than 24 hours from the onset of cauda equina syndrome compared with patients treated within 24-48 hours. Similarly, no difference in outcome occurred in patients treated more than 48 hours after the onset of symptoms. Significant differences, however, were found in resolution of sensory and motor deficits as well as urinary and rectal function in patients treated within 48 hours compared with those treated more than 48 hours after onset of symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant advantage to treating patients within 48 hours versus more than 48 hours after the onset of cauda equina syndrome. A significant improvement in sensory and motor deficits as well as urinary and rectal function occurred in patients who underwent decompression within 48 hours versus after 48 hours.

SPHINCTER INVOLVEMENT IN LUMBAR DISC HERNIATION

A retrospective analysis of 30 operated cases of prolapsed lumbar disc with cauda equina syndrome was carried out. 27 were male and 3 were female. Age varied from 27 to 60 years. 10 were acute presentation and 20 had previous history of backache-sciatica syndrome. The most common sphincter dysfunction was urinary retention and other neurological findings, pointing to sphincter involvement were impairment of sensation in the perineum, lax anal sphincter and absent superficial anal reflex. The other motor or sensory deficit depended on level of disc herniation. The majority of our patients reached us between 7-14 days after onset of sphincter dysfunction. Emergency myelogram was the most common investigation done and L 4/5 was most common disc herniation. Emergency surgery was done in 24 cases and semi emergency in 6 cases. Patients were followed up and at 1 year follow-up 12 had recovered fully, 7 partially and in rest 11 patients there was no significant improvement in sphincter functions.

Medical realities of cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar disc herniation

STUDY DESIGN

An analysis of 44 cauda equina syndrome cases.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the neurologic outcome of cauda equina syndrome cases, in light of the significant medical implications of this disorder.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cauda equina syndrome from lumbar disc herniation accounts for up to 1% of all disc herniations. Most of the literature supports surgery within 24 hours as a means of improving the outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective chi 2 analysis was performed of 44 patients surgically treated for lumbar disc herniation who initially sought treatment for cauda equina syndrome.

RESULTS

In 20 patients, diagnosis was made and surgery performed within 48 hours of the cauda equina syndrome onset, including 18 patients (90%) who underwent surgery within 24 hours. In 24 patients, surgery was performed more than 48 hours after the onset of cauda equina syndrome, with a mean delay of 9 days, including 17 patients (71%) with a mean delay of 3.7 days. Causes for delay were patient-related in 4 cases (17%) and physician-related in 20 cases (83%). According to chi 2 analysis, a greater chance of persistent bladder/sphincter problem (P = 0.008), persistent severe motor deficit (P = 0.006), persistent pain (P = 0.025), and sexual dysfunction (P = 0.006) existed with delayed surgery.

CONCLUSION

The data strongly support the management of cauda equina syndrome from lumbar disc herniation as a diagnostic and surgical emergency.