Effect of vigabatrin on sedation and cognitive function in patients with refractory epilepsy

Psychobehavioural and Cognitive Adverse Events of Anti-Seizure Medications for the Treatment of Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathies

The developmental and epileptic encephalopathies encompass a group of rare syndromes characterised by severe drug-resistant epilepsy with onset in childhood and significant neurodevelopmental comorbidities. The latter include intellectual disability, developmental delay, behavioural problems including attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder, psychiatric problems including anxiety and depression, speech impairment and sleep problems. Classical examples of developmental and epileptic encephalopathies include Dravet syndrome, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and tuberous sclerosis complex. The mainstay of treatment is with multiple anti-seizure medications (ASMs); however, the ASMs themselves can be associated with psychobehavioural adverse events, and effects (negative or positive) on cognition and sleep. We have performed a targeted literature review of ASMs commonly used in the treatment of developmental and epileptic encephalopathies to discuss the latest evidence on their effects on behaviour, mood, cognition, sedation and sleep. The ASMs include valproate (VPA), clobazam, topiramate (TPM), cannabidiol (CBD), fenfluramine (FFA), levetiracetam (LEV), brivaracetam (BRV), zonisamide (ZNS), perampanel (PER), ethosuximide, stiripentol, lamotrigine (LTG), rufinamide, vigabatrin, lacosamide (LCM) and everolimus. Bromide, felbamate and other sodium channel ASMs are discussed briefly. Overall, the current evidence suggest that LEV, PER and to a lesser extent BRV are associated with psychobehavioural adverse events including aggressiveness and irritability; TPM and to a lesser extent ZNS are associated with language impairment and cognitive dulling/memory problems. Patients with a history of behavioural and psychiatric comorbidities may be more at risk of developing psychobehavioural adverse events. Topiramate and ZNS may be associated with negative effects in some aspects of cognition; CBD, FFA, LEV, BRV and LTG may have some positive effects, while the remaining ASMs do not appear to have a detrimental effect. All the ASMs are associated with sedation to a certain extent, which is pronounced during uptitration. Cannabidiol, PER and pregabalin may be associated with improvements in sleep, LTG is associated with insomnia, while VPA, TPM, LEV, ZNS and LCM do not appear to have detrimental effects. There was variability in the extent of evidence for each ASM: for many first-generation and some second-generation ASMs, there is scant documented evidence; however, their extensive use suggests favourable tolerability and safety (e.g. VPA); second-generation and some third-generation ASMs tend to have the most robust evidence documented over several years of use (TPM, LEV, PER, ZNS, BRV), while evidence is still being generated for newer ASMs such as CBD and FFA. Finally, we discuss how a variety of factors can affect mood, behaviour and cognition, and untangling the associations between the effects of the underlying syndrome and those of the ASMs can be challenging. In particular, there is enormous heterogeneity in cognitive, behavioural and developmental impairments that is complex and can change naturally over time; there is a lack of standardised instruments for evaluating these outcomes in developmental and epileptic encephalopathies, with a reliance on subjective evaluations by proxy (caregivers); and treatment regimes are complex involving multiple ASMs as well as other drugs.

The Discordance between Network Excitability and Cognitive Performance Following Vigabatrin Treatment during Epileptogenesis

Vigabatrin (VGB), a potent selective γ-aminobutyric acid transaminase (GABA-T) inhibitor, is an approved non-traditional anti-seizure drug for patients with intractable epilepsy. Nevertheless, its effect on epileptogenesis, and whether this effect is correlated with post-epileptogenic cognitive function remain unclear. Based on lithium-pilocarpine-induced seizure modeling, we evaluated the effect of VGB on epileptogenesis and neuronal damage following status epilepticus in Sprague-Dawley rats. Cognitive evaluations were performed with the aid of inhibitory avoidance testing. We found that VGB could interrupt epileptogenesis by reducing spontaneous recurrent seizures, hippocampal neuronal damage, and chronic mossy fiber sprouting. Nevertheless, VGB did not help with the retention of cognitive performance. Our findings suggest that further research into the role of VGB in epileptogenesis and the treatment of epilepsy in clinical practice is warranted.

The cognitive impact of antiepileptic drugs

Effective treatment of epilepsy depends on medication compliance across a lifetime, and studies indicate that drug tolerability is a significant limiting factor in medication maintenance. Available antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have the potential to exert detrimental effects on cognitive function and therefore compromise patient wellbeing. On the other hand, some agents may serve to enhance cognitive function. In this review paper, we highlight the range of effects on cognition linked to a variety of newer and older AEDs, encompassing key alterations in both specific executive abilities and broader neuropsychological functions. Importantly, the data reviewed suggest that the effects exerted by an AED could vary depending on both patient characteristics and drug-related variables. However, there are considerable difficulties in evaluating the available evidence. Many studies have failed to investigate the influence of patient and treatment variables on cognitive functioning. Other difficulties include variation across studies in relation to design, treatment group and assessment tools, poor reporting of methodology and poor specification of the cognitive abilities assessed. Focused and rigorous experimental designs including a range of cognitive measures assessing more precisely defined abilities are needed to fill the gaps in our knowledge and follow up reported patterns in the literature. Longitudinal studies are needed to improve our understanding of the influence of factors such as age, tolerance and the stability of cognitive effects. Future trials comparing the effects of commonly prescribed agents across patient subgroups will offer critical insight into the role of patient characteristics in determining the cognitive impact of particular AEDs.

Non-vision adverse events with vigabatrin therapy

Vigabatrin is an effective antiepileptic drug (AED) for the treatment of refractory complex partial seizures (rCPS) and infantile spasms (IS). In clinical trials, vigabatrin was generally well-tolerated with an adverse event profile similar to that of other AEDs. The most common treatment-related adverse events were central nervous system effects, including drowsiness, dizziness, headache, and fatigue, with adjunctive vigabatrin in adults with rCPS, and sedation, somnolence, and irritability with vigabatrin monotherapy in infants with IS. Vigabatrin had little effect on cognitive function, mood, or behavior in a battery of neuropsychologic tests for rCPS. In placebo-controlled clinical trials, the incidence of depression and psychosis, but not other psychiatric adverse events, was greater with vigabatrin than placebo. Intramyelinic edema (IME) was initially identified in rats and dogs and led to a temporary suspension of clinical trials in the United States. IME was subsequently correlated with delays in evoked potential (EP) and increased T(2) -weighted signals on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Clinical trials of vigabatrin were allowed to resume after IME was not detected by neuropathologic assessments of autopsy and neurosurgical specimens or by serial EP or MRI assessments in older children and adults receiving vigabatrin. Subsequently, MRI abnormalities characterized by increased T(2) intensity and restricted diffusion were identified in infants treated with vigabatrin for IS. These abnormalities generally resolved with discontinuation of vigabatrin and, in some cases, during continued therapy. The benefit of improved seizure control must be balanced against the potential risks associated with vigabatrin, including abnormal MRI changes and other vigabatrin-related safety issues.

Balancing clinical benefits of vigabatrin with its associated risk of vision loss

Vigabatrin is an effective and well-tolerated antiepileptic drug (AED) for the treatment of refractory complex partial seizures (rCPS) and infantile spasms (IS), but its benefits must be evaluated in conjunction with its risk of retinopathy with the development of peripheral visual field defects (pVFDs). Vigabatrin should be considered for rCPS if a patient has failed appropriate trials of other AEDs or is not a suitable candidate for other AEDs, is not an optimal surgical candidate, and continues to experience debilitating effects from seizures. Vigabatrin is indicated as monotherapy for pediatric patients with IS. Its efficacy in achieving improved seizure control should be apparent within 12 weeks in patients with rCPS and within 2-4 weeks after attaining appropriate dosage for patients with IS. Because 12 weeks is well less than the known time of onset of visual defects, the risk of developing pVFDs may be minimized by discontinuing vigabatrin early during the course of therapy for patients with inadequate response. Appropriate vision screening is recommended at baseline, every 3 months during continued vigabatrin treatment, and at 3-6 months after discontinuation (if therapy has spanned more than a few months). If a pVFD is detected at any point and the decision is made to discontinue therapy, the pVFD is not likely to progress after discontinuation of vigabatrin. Although some patients will be at risk of retinopathy, vigabatrin is an appropriate treatment option for patients who achieve substantial clinical benefit, especially given the severe consequences of rCPS and uncontrolled IS. While retinopathy with the development of pVFDs is a serious adverse event, it is not life-threatening and its risk can be effectively managed.

Antiepileptic drug-induced cognitive adverse effects: potential mechanisms and contributing factors

Cognitive dysfunction is frequently observed in patients with epilepsy and represents an important challenge in the management of patients with this disorder. In this respect, the relative contribution of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is of relevance. The fact that a considerable number of patients require AED therapy for many years, or perhaps even a lifetime, emphasizes the need to focus on the long-term adverse effects of these drugs on cognition. The most prevalent of the CNS adverse effects observed during AED therapy are sedation, somnolence, distractibility, insomnia and dizziness. Sedation, in particular, is associated with most of the commonly used AED therapies. Nevertheless, cognitive function in individuals with epilepsy may also be influenced by several factors, of which AEDs constitute only one of many putative causes. In general terms, most studies agree that some differences exist among the older AEDs with regard to the effects on cognition, and some newer generation molecules may have a better cognitive profile than older AEDs. The mechanisms of action are an obvious determinant; however, there is still a lack of evidence for differentiation between available drugs with regard to cognitive effects. Some authors have suggested that there may be different cognitive effects associated with individual drugs; however, the question as to whether there are more specific deficits related to the action of individual drugs remains unsolved. There seems to be agreement that polytherapy and high-dose treatment can produce cognitive adverse effects and when high dosages or adjunctive polytherapy is needed, the balance between benefits and disadvantages may be negatively biased against drug treatment. Thus, drug treatment requires careful balancing in the attempt to reach maximal seizure control while avoiding neurotoxic adverse effects. Finally, the mood status of the patient and clinical relevance of the information obtained by neuropsychological testing represent important variables that need to be taken into account when discussing cognitive adverse effects of AEDs.

Treatment of refractory complex partial seizures: role of vigabatrin

Vigabatrin (VGB) is an antiepileptic drug that was designed to inhibit GABA-transaminase, and increase levels of gamma-amino-butyric acid (GABA), a major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain. VGB has demonstrated efficacy as an adjunctive antiepileptic drug for refractory complex partial seizures (CPS) and for infantile spasms (IS). This review focuses on its use for complex partial seizures. Although VGB is well tolerated, there have been significant safety concerns about intramyelinic edema and visual field defects. VGB is associated with a risk of developing bilateral concentric visual field defects. Therefore, the use of VGB for complex partial seizures should be limited to those patients with seizures refractory to other treatments. Patients must have baseline and follow-up monitoring of visual fields, early assessment of its efficacy, and ongoing evaluation of the benefits and risks of VGB therapy.

Cognitive side effects of antiepileptic drugs

Antiepileptic drugs produce global changes in the excitation levels in the central nervous system and often lead to cognitive and behavioral deficits. These deficits vary and must be considered independently in every patient. A number of consistent risk factors have been established. Polypharmacy and high blood levels of an antiepileptic drug (AED) increase the risk of cognitive side effects. Different effects have been demonstrated for some AEDs, but comparative data are incomplete across all of them. Other factors such as patient age and type/frequency of seizures may also be important contributors to the patient's cognitive state. AEDs can have positive or negative effects on mood, providing another consideration in choosing the course of treatment.

Effect of antiepileptic drugs on cognitive function in individuals with epilepsy: a comparative review of newer versus older agents

Several 'new' antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), i.e. oxcarbazepine, vigabatrin, lamotrigine, zonisamide, gabapentin, tiagabine, topiramate and levetiracetam have been introduced into clinical practice within the last decade. Most of these new drugs are at least as effective as the 'old' AEDs [phenytoin, phenobarbital (phenobarbitone), valproic acid (sodium valproate) and carbamazepine] and, in general, they seem to be better tolerated than the old drugs. The new AEDs might have less influence on cognitive functions but the aspect has not been systematically studied. Neuropsychological testing has been the major method of objectively examining cognitive function related to the use of AEDs but a number of methodological problems blur the results. Alteration of cognition might reflect a chronic adverse effect of AEDs but the negative effects of the drugs are only one of several factors that may influence cognition. In addition, subjective complaints about cognitive deficits (e.g. memory problems or attention) may also reflect other aspects of adverse effects than those concerning specific cognitive functions (e.g. mood and anxiety). This review focuses on studies of the cognitive effects of the new AEDs, and in particular on studies that compare cognitive effects of the old and new drugs. In general, the new AEDs seem to display no or minor negative cognitive effects. In studies in which new AEDs have been compared with old AEDs, there was a tendency in favour of the new AEDs in some of the studies.

Neuropsychological effects of epilepsy and antiepileptic drugs

Epilepsy and its treatment can have deleterious cognitive and behavioural consequences. Affected individuals have a higher prevalence of neuropsychological dysfunction than the general population because of complex interactions among several multifaceted and overlapping influences--for example, underlying neuropathologies, ictal and interictal neuronal discharges, a plethora of antiepileptic drugs, and numerous psychosocial issues. Research into the clinical relevance of these factors has been dogged by a range of methodological pitfalls including lack of standardisation of neuropsychological tests, small numbers and multiple testing, and statistical failure to appreciate differential effects of interactive elements in individual patients. Although antiepileptic drugs can impair neuropsychological functioning, their positive effect on seizure control might improve cognition and behaviour. Each person should be assessed individually with respect to factors unique to his or her seizure disorder and its treatment.

Quality-of-life and behavioral outcome measures in randomized controlled trials of antiepileptic drugs: a systematic review of methodology and reporting standards

PURPOSE

To review the methodology and use of quality-of-life and behavioral measures used in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of antiepileptic drugs in patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

Trial reports were found by searching a previously developed comprehensive database of epilepsy RCTs and searching through journals by hand. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, and methodological and quality-of-life and behavioral measure data were extracted.

RESULTS

There were 52 different measures used in 46 trials, with the Profile of Mood States, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, and the Washington Psychosocial Seizure Inventory being applied the most frequently. Overall, evidence of the reliability, validity, and sensitivity of measures used in populations of people with epilepsy was sparse. There was also little information on the clinical interpretation of the results.

CONCLUSION

Our results highlight a consistent failure to apply quality-of-life and behavioral measures in RCTs in a systematic way. We found repeated evidence of researchers' failure to review the use of previous measures and selection of measures without evidence of their appropriateness for use in a population with epilepsy. We recommend the use of quality-of-life and behavioral measures in RCTs with proven psychometric properties in a population with epilepsy.

Current discoveries on the cognitive effects of antiepileptic drugs

The cognitive effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are of particular concern to clinicians because these drugs are the primary therapeutic modality for managing epilepsy. In general, the cognitive effects of most AEDs are modest and offset by their benefit in reducing seizures. Nonetheless, the cognitive effects of a particular AED may be clinically significant when treating specific patient populations, such as children and the elderly.

Newer anticonvulsants: comparative review of drug interactions and adverse effects

The tolerability and drug interaction profiles of 6 new anticonvulsants: oxcarbazepine, vigabatrin, lamotrigine, gabapentin, tiagabine and topiramate, are reviewed. In general, these new anticonvulsants are well tolerated and drug interaction problems are minor with the exception of the risk of failure of oral contraceptives during treatment with oxcarbazepine or topiramate. In this review, the clinical implications of the tolerability of these drugs are discussed for different patient groups. The choice of which new anticonvulsant for which patient depends upon individual factors, in particular, seizure type, tolerability and practical administration factors. Treating elderly patients may be complicated by an increased sensitivity to adverse effects as these patients very often receive polytherapy for accompanying diseases. Drugs with very simple pharmacokinetic properties may be preferred in this group. Women of childbearing age face specific problems related to the epilepsy and to treatment with anticonvulsants. These include impaired fertility, failure of oral contraceptives and the risk of birth defects. Some new anticonvulsants may be suggested in preference to classical drugs to avoid these problems, but the human experience with newer anticonvulsants is still limited and, therefore, so is knowledge of the risk of congenital malformations in the offspring of mothers taking anticonvulsants. Psychiatric and behavioural changes frequently complicate treatment of patients with mental retardation. Some of the new anticonvulsants, in particular those affecting the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) system such as vigabatrin, seem to exacerbate this problem and should be used with caution in these patients.

Anticonvulsants and breast feeding: a critical review

Progress in the diagnosis and management of seizure disorders and the availability of effective anticonvulsive medications has enabled increasing numbers of epileptic women of child-bearing age to raise families. Breast feeding, which these women may wish to choose, provides health, nutritional, immunological, developmental, social, economic and environmental benefits. The traditional anticonvulsants, such as phenytoin, carbamazepine and valproic acid (valproate sodium), are generally considered safe for use during breast feeding; however, observation for adverse effects is recommended. The use of phenobarbital while breast feeding is controversial because of its slow elimination by the nursing infant. The newer anticonvulsants, such as clobazam, felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, and vigabatrin, are used mainly as adjunctive therapy. Data on the use of these drugs in pregnancy and lactation, and regarding long term effects on cognition and behaviour, are sparse. Weighing the benefits of breast feeding against the potential risk to the nursing infant, breast feeding is considered to be safe when the mother is taking carbamazepine, valproic acid or phenytoin. Infant monitoring for potential adverse effects is advisable when the mother is taking phenobarbital, clobazam, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine or vigabatrin. Monitoring of infant serum drug concentrations is advisable but not compulsory. The use of felbamate, tiagabine and topiramate during breast feeding should await further study.

Vigabatrin: a novel therapy for seizure disorders

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and adverse effects of vigabatrin and its role in the management of seizure disorders.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search of English-language literature from January 1993 through January 1999 was conducted using vigabatrin as a search term to identify pertinent studies and review articles. Additional studies were identified from the bibliographies of reviewed literature. The manufacturer provided postmarketing surveillance data. Priority was given to randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.

FINDINGS

Vigabatrin is a selective and irreversible inhibitor of gamma-aminobutyric acid transaminase. In controlled clinical trials of vigabatrin add-on therapy in patients with uncontrolled partial seizures, 24-67% of patients achieved a < or =50% reduction in seizure frequency. Data from two comparative trials with carbamazepine monotherapy indicate that vigabatrin monotherapy reduces the frequency of partial seizures in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Vigabatrin also controls infantile spasms, particularly those associated with tuberous sclerosis. Vigabatrin is more effective in patients with partial seizures than in those with generalized seizures. The drug is generally well tolerated. Headache and drowsiness were the most common adverse effects observed in controlled clinical trials; visual field defects, psychiatric reactions, and hyperactivity also have been reported. There are no known clinically significant drug interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Vigabatrin improves seizure control as add-on therapy for refractory partial seizures and may produce therapeutic benefits in the treatment of infantile spasms. Vigabatrin is generally well tolerated, with a convenient administration schedule, a lack of known significant drug interactions, and no need for routine monitoring of plasma concentrations.

Neuropsychological outcomes in randomized controlled trials of antiepileptic drugs: a systematic review of methodology and reporting standards

PURPOSE

To systematically review the methodology and use of neuropsychological tests in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

Trial reports were found by searching Medline 1966-1996 and searching through journals by hand. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, and methodological and neuropsychological test data was extracted by using a proforma.

RESULTS

43 reports met our inclusion criteria, representing 40 RCTs. as three RCTs had generated two reports. Twenty-two were actively controlled, and 18 were placebo-controlled studies. Reporting of basic methods such as randomization method was poor. There has been no uniform approach to the use of neuropsychological tests, and a total of 87 has been used. The Stroop Colour Word Test and the Finger Tapping Test were most commonly used, at 13 times each, but were not used or reported in a uniform manner.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor reporting of methods and the use of a plethora of neuropsychological tests create great difficulties for anyone wishing to make sense of currently available data. If we are better to understand the neuropsychological effects of AEDs, a more rational approach is needed, for which recommendations are made.

Antiepileptic drugs, learning, and behavior in childhood epilepsy

Cognitive and behavioral impairments are found more often among epileptic children than among their peers. The cause of these impairments is multifactorial. Identifying the relative contribution of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) to these problems has been the object of a large number of clinical investigations. This area of research has been characterized by an unusually high number of methodological challenges and pitfalls. Accordingly, results have often been inconsistent and contradictory, except for the more obvious observations that can be derived from clinical experience. Overall, the effects of AEDs on cognition and behavior in children have been overrated in the past. More recent research has benefited from the methodological lessons of previous studies and it suggests that the majority of children taking AEDs do not experience clinically relevant cognitive of behavioral adverse effects from these medications. In addition, some of the newer AEDs may indeed have a better cognitive profile. Nevertheless, clinical experience must be used to identify the subgroup of children who remain at risk for significant and clinically relevant cognitive and behavioral adverse effects of AEDs.

Cognitive effects of anticonvulsant monotherapy in elderly patients: a placebo-controlled study

Old age is recognized to be the commonest time in life to develop epilepsy. There is a perception that older patients are more sensitive to the deleterious cognitive effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Elderly patients (median age 70 years, range 60-88 years) taking anticonvulsant monotherapy (10 carbamazepine [CBZ], 8 sodium valproate [VPA], 5 phenytoin [PHT]) took an extra dose of their usual medication (200mg CBZ, 500mg VPA, 100mg PHT) and matched placebo each for a month in random order. The concentrations of AEDs were higher after 7 and 28 days of active treatment compared with placebo (7 days: CBZ 9.5 vs. 7.8 mg L(-1), p < 0.05; VPA 97 vs. 64 mg L(-1), p < 0.05; PHT 13 vs. 11 mg L(-1), p < 0.05; 28 days: CBZ 9.4 vs. 7.7 mg L(-1); p < 0.01, VPA 85 vs. 60 mg L(-1), p < 0.05; PHT 16 vs. 13 mg L(-1), p < 0.05). Despite these increases in concentration, there were no significant changes in attention, reaction time, finger tapping, memory, side-effect scale or sedation scoring during the active phases compared with placebo phases for the three drugs analysed together and separately. Elderly patients taking standard AEDs as monotherapy did not develop cognitive impairment when the dose was modestly increased within the target range for each drug.

Cognitive side effects of medications

Iatrogenically induced cognitive deficits are common with pharmacological therapy. The deficits may range from gross encephalopathy with delirium to subtle subjective alterations (e.g., mood and perception of well being). The risks are increased for certain drug types, polypharmacy, the elderly, and patients with dementia or metabolic abnormalities. This review examines methodological concerns and the neuropsychological data on cognitive side effects across a variety of commonly used medicines in clinical practice.

Vigabatrin as add-on therapy in children and adolescents with refractory epilepsy: an open trial

Seventy-seven children and adolescents with drug-resistant epilepsies received vigabatrin as add-on therapy for a median of 18 months (range 4-36 months) at a dose of 50 mg/kg/day divided in two doses; patients with spasms were given a maximum dose of 100 mg/kg/day. In 23 patients (29.9%), seizure frequency decreased by 50-100% and in 12 patients (15.6%) by 25-50%. The number of seizures remained unchanged in 34 patients (44.1%) and increased in seven (9.1%). Vigabatrin was most effective in cryptogenic and symptomatic partial seizures (39% and 43%, respectively), and in infantile spasms (25%). Adverse events occurred in 20 patients (26%), though they were generally mild and transient, suggesting that vigabatrin is well tolerated.

Gabapentin and cognition: a double blind, dose ranging, placebo controlled study in refractory epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of different doses of gabapentin (GBP) on cognitive function in treated epileptic patients.

METHODS

Twenty seven patients with refractory partial seizures commenced a double blind, dose ranging, placebo controlled, crossover study of adjuvant GBP. Each treatment phase lasted three months, during which the dose of GBP or matched placebo was increased stepwise at intervals of four weeks (1200 mg/day, 1800 mg/day, and 2400 mg/day in three daily doses). Psychomotor and memory testing was carried out at the end of each four week period, at which time the patient also completed subjective measures of cognition, fatigue, worry, temper, and dysphoria. A visual analogue scale was used to assess drowsiness and a questionnaire was employed to gauge the severity of side effects.

RESULTS

In the 21 patients completing the study, GBP produced a significant reduction in median monthly seizure frequency from 7 to 4.3 (P = 0.02), the decrease being most pronounced for secondarily generalised seizures (from 1.0 to 0.3, P = 0.01). Forty three per cent of patients reported a reduction in seizure frequency of at least 50% throughout all GBP doses. Mean (SD) plasma concentrations of GBP at 1200, 1800, and 2400 mg/day were 4.7 (2.6), 6.8 (3.8), and 8.6 (3.3) mg/l respectively. The drug had no effect on composite psychomotor and memory scores; nor was there alteration in any self assessment subscore. The mean drowsiness (P = 0.03) score was higher during treatment with 2400 mg GBP daily compared with matched placebo. Composite psychomotor (r = -0.47, P < 0.01), tiredness (r = 0.42, P < 0.01), and side effect (r = 0.61, P < 0.001) scores correlated significantly with seizure frequency but not with GBP dose.

CONCLUSION

GBP is a well tolerated and effective antiepileptic drug which had no measurable effect on cognition but did produce sedation at the highest dose. This study also supports the suggestion that seizures can cause cognitive impairment.

A quantitative study of daytime sleepiness induced by carbamazepine and add-on vigabatrin in epileptic patients

INTRODUCTION

The clinical relevance of daytime sleepiness associated with carbamazepine (CBZ) and vigabatrin (VGB) was objectively assessed by the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) and nocturnal sleep recordings.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-six patients with partial epilepsy and mean monthly seizure frequency of 4, aged 18 to 48 years, receiving chronic monotherapy with CBZ and subsequent VGB addition for 2 months (14 patients), were compared with a group of healthy subjects. Subjective daytime sleepiness was complained by 13 patients on CBZ monotherapy and 9 patients during VGB add-on treatment.

RESULTS

No differences in nocturnal sleep parameters, but significantly shorter daytime sleep latencies at the MSLT, were detected in CBZ-treated patients as compared with healthy controls. Addition of VGB therapy did not further enhance objective daytime sleepiness.

CONCLUSION

Some sleepiness occurs in chronically CBZ-treated epileptic patients, which can be objectively measured by the MSLT, but it is not aggravated by add-on VGB.

Influence of vigabatrin on cognitive performances and behaviour in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this research was to evaluate changes in cognitive performances, mood and quality of life in drug-resistant epileptic patients, after the introduction of Vigabatrin (VGB) as additional treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A four-step evaluation was carried out in two groups of 20 patients each, randomly assigned to VGB or placebo treatment. A battery of neuropsychological tests investigating attention, memory and adaptive abilities, associated with inventories concerning depression, quality of life and the concern of families upon patient behaviour, were utilised. For each subject, four evaluations were performed, two before and two after VGB/placebo administration.

RESULTS

No relevant side-effects regarding cognition and behavior were detected in the VGB group. The intra-group comparison between pre- and post-treatment phases showed a slight improvement in cognitive performances of VGB patients and a positive change in their overall psychological status. The inter-group comparison confirmed the selective improvement occurring in the trend of a few neuropsychological test scores in the VGB group.

CONCLUSION

Such results help to reject the hypothesis that the addition of VGB to the current antiepileptic treatment may affect cognitive performances and behaviour.

Cognitive Adverse Effects of Antiepileptic Drugs : Incidence, Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications

Several early studies suggested that differences exist between antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in terms of their propensity to cause adverse effects on cognitive functions, favouring carbamazepine over phenobarbital (phenobarbitone), phenytoin and valproic acid (sodium valproate). The combined results of recent studies in patients and healthy volunteers reveal that at therapeutic serum concentrations phenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine and valproic acid produce nearly comparable adverse effects on higher cognitive functions.The newer AEDs (with the exception of zonisamide and topiramate) appear to induced fewer cognitive adverse effects than the older agents. Furthermore, there is limited evidence that gabapentin, lamotrigine and vigabatrin may have beneficial effects on cognitive function. Some of the newer AEDs may also have neuroprotective effects that can prevent seizure-induced neuronal damage, and so reduce cognitive dysfunction. This is an important clinical consideration, as even modest differences between older and newer AEDs are relevant for patients.

Cognitive side-effects of chronic antiepileptic drug treatment: a review of 25 years of research

Over 90 investigations have been conducted over the past 25 years to determine what effect AEDs have on cognition. No satisfactory answer to this problem can be given, however, chiefly because there is a paucity of studies that pass fairly basic standards of methodology, design and analysis that apply to the evaluation of any clinical research. This severely limits the precision of statements regarding cognitive AED effects. More particularly, there is little reason to recommend any of the first-line AEDs as the AED of choice from the standpoint of cognitive side-effects. On the basis of the present review we are not in a position to provide a straightforward answer to the most pertinent question, i.e., whether AEDs in therapeutic doses have any cognitive effects at all, good or bad. If we reduce the available database to monotherapy studies in epilepsy that use control group data for comparison, employ an appropriate form of repeated measures analysis, and provide sufficient information, very few studies remain that are directly relevant to this issue. This in itself precludes definitive conclusions. As can be seen from Table 9, absolute effects of CBZ and VPA have been examined in epilepsy patients three times each (in four studies), PB has been examined two times, PHT only once. In addition to the paucity of relevant data, there are miscellaneous validity concerns in all of these studies, one recurring theme being that of inconclusive 'no effect' findings with small samples. Without firm knowledge about absolute effects, relative effects, and particularly their absence, are difficult to interpret. Employing the above criteria (except that concerning controls), ten epilepsy studies that address this issue remain (Table 10). It is instructive to look at the number of times particular AEDs have been compared against each other (Table 11). CBZ has been compared to PHT five times, other comparisons occur only once or twice. Again, this is hardly a basis for definitive statements, particularly because validity concerns occur here as well. Recurring concerns here are scattered significant findings that tend to disappear if adjustment of the significance level for multiple comparisons is done, and inconclusive 'no difference' findings with small samples. Even if there were no conclusion validity concerns in individual studies, comparison between studies would be complicated by considerable variation in the subjects studied. Five of the studies summarized in Tables 8 and 9 use children as subject, nine use adults; results obtained in one group may not be generalizable to the other. Also, subjects may be newly diagnosed cases, or patients already on chronic treatment. The latter choice of subjects may be a factor working against detecting cognitive side-effects, as the damage (if any) may already have been done before the beginning of the trial. In addition, a wide variety of assessment tools have been used to search for cognitive effects of AEDs, ranging from measurements of reaction time and motor speed to intelligence tests. Some of these may be more sensitive to drug induced changes in cognition than others. Still, the tentative overall picture emerging from the creme de la creme of research on cognitive AED effects is that differences in cognitive profiles may not be very large. An important point here, of course, is the magnitude of the difference one considers worth detecting. Very few studies have attempted to answer this question. In the majority of studies we examined, a large treatment effect was anticipated implicitly, judging from the generally limited sample sizes. The choice of a study design based on a large treatment effect size may not always be appropriate, though. Of course, one could argue that it is only large effects that may be of practical or clinical significance anyways [30] and that effects of lesser magnitude are of no consequence. However, there are many examples where even a small benefit of one treatme

Open label trial with vigabatrin in children with intractable epilepsy

Thirty children (20 males, 10 females) with intractable epilepsy received vigabatrin (VGB) as an open label basis to preexisting antiepileptic drugs. The seizure types consisted of generalized tonic clonic seizure [10], complex partial seizure [8], myoclonic seizure [7], and mixed type with simple partial seizure, complex partial seizure and/or generalized seizure [5]. The cause of the epilepsy was cryptogenic in 16 and symptomatic in 12. The current dosage regime of anticonvulsants were maintained during the trial period. VGB at 40-80 mg/kg/day were titrated according to the clinical response for a period of 2-24 months. The result of treatment was categorized as 'responders' with 13 (43%) having 50-75% reduction of seizure frequency; and 'non-responders' which consisted of 17 children. There was no relationship between outcome of VBG add-on therapy and the sex, age of onset, type of seizure, type of epileptic syndrome, etiology, associated neurological abnormality, mental retardation or abnormal brain CT/MRI findings.

New antiepileptic drugs--an explosion of activity

The low therapeutic index of established antiepileptic drugs coupled with a better understanding of the pathophysiology of seizure production has led to the development of a range of new therapeutic agents for the treatment of epilepsy. In this review, the three drugs recently licensed in the UK (vigabatrin, lamotrigine and gabapentin) are profiled, together with several of the more promising up-and-coming compounds (oxcarbazepine, felbamate, tiagabine, stiripentol, remacemide and topiramate). Future avenues for clinical research in the pharmacological management of the epilepsies involve their rational use both singly and in combination.

Cognitive and behavioral effects of antiepileptic drugs

All antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have the potential for adverse effects on cognition and behavior. Most of the major AEDs, administered in therapeutic doses, cause little or no cognitive or behavioral impairment in group studies. However, individual variability is considerable, and some patients do not tolerate low serum levels, whereas others tolerate high levels without subjective or objective effects. In the past, carbamazepine (CBZ) and valproate (VPA) have been reported to have the fewest adverse cognitive and behavioral effects in children and adults. However, several recent, well-controlled studies have not found significant differences between the effects of phenytoin (PHT) and those of CBZ or VPA. Greater adverse effects have been found for phenobarbital (PB). However, we must use environmentally relevant measures of cognitive and behavioral functioning to measure effects on daily functioning. Future studies must define cognitive and behavioral toxicity in subpopulations (e.g., post-traumatic epilepsy, mental retardation, depression) and with the new AEDs.

Effects of vigabatrin on partial seizures and cognitive function

Forty five patients with refractory partial seizures were studied in a prospective, randomised, placebo controlled, add on, parallel group, double blind trial of the new antiepileptic drug vigabatrin (1.5 g twice daily) followed by open treatment. Seizure frequency was monitored throughout an eight week baseline, 20 weeks double blind, and up to 18 months of open vigabatrin treatment. Cognitive function, including measures of memory and concentration, mood, and behaviour were assessed at baseline and again during the 20th week of treatment. Vigabatrin was associated with a significant reduction in a measure of motor speed and overall score on a design learning test in the first 20 weeks of treatment. In comparison with the baseline period, vigabatrin treatment was associated with a significant reduction in median complex partial seizure frequency four to 12 and 12 to 20 weeks after commencing vigabatrin (-66% and -69% in the vigabatrin group, +50% and +25% in the placebo group). Ten of 20 patients on vigabatrin and four of 23 on placebo showed a > 50% reduction in complex partial seizure frequency in the last eight weeks of double blind treatment. At least 60% of responders had maintained the response to vigabatrin when assessed during the open phase of the trial at 44 weeks. Two patients discontinued vigabatrin because of depression, which resolved on drug withdrawal.