Motor response to apomorphine and levodopa in asymmetric Parkinson's disease

3D Kinematics Quantifies Gait Response to Levodopa earlier and to a more Comprehensive Extent than the MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale in Patients with Motor Complications

BACKGROUND

Quantitative 3D movement analysis using inertial measurement units (IMUs) allows for a more detailed characterization of motor patterns than clinical assessment alone. It is essential to discriminate between gait features that are responsive or unresponsive to current therapies to better understand the underlying pathophysiological basis and identify potential therapeutic strategies.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to characterize the responsiveness and temporal evolution of different gait subcomponents in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients in their OFF and various ON states following levodopa administration, utilizing both wearable sensors and the gold-standard MDS-UPDRS motor part III.

METHODS

Seventeen PD patients were assessed while wearing a full-body set of 15 IMUs in their OFF state and at 20-minute intervals following the administration of a supra-threshold levodopa dose. Gait was reconstructed using a biomechanical model of the human body to quantify how each feature was modulated. Comparisons with non-PD control subjects were conducted in parallel.

RESULTS

Significant motor changes were observed in both the upper and lower limbs according to the MDS-UPDRS III, 40 minutes after levodopa intake. IMU-assisted 3D kinematics detected significant motor alterations as early as 20 minutes after levodopa administration, particularly in upper limbs metrics. Although all "pace-domain" gait features showed significant improvement in the Best-ON state, most rhythmicity, asymmetry, and variability features did not.

CONCLUSION

IMUs are capable of detecting motor alterations earlier and in a more comprehensive manner than the MDS-UPDRS III. The upper limbs respond more rapidly to levodopa, possibly reflecting distinct thresholds to levodopa across striatal regions.

Inhibitory Effect of Apomorphine on Focal and Nonfocal Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex

Dopamine is crucial for neuroplasticity, which is considered to be the neurophysiological foundation of learning and memory. The specific effect of dopamine on plasticity such as long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) is determined by receptor subtype specificity, concentration level, and the kind of plasticity induction technique. In healthy human subjects, the dopamine precursor levodopa (L-DOPA) exerts a dosage-dependent non-linear effect on motor cortex plasticity. Low and high dosage L-DOPA impaired or abolished plasticity, while medium-dose preserved and reversed plasticity in previous studies. Similar dosage-dependent effects were also observed for selective D1-like and D2-like receptor activation that favor excitatory and inhibitory plasticity, respectively. However, such a dosage-dependent effect has not been explored for a nonselective dopamine agonist such as apomorphine in humans. To this aim, nonfocal and focal motor cortex plasticity induction using paired associative stimulation (PAS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) were performed respectively in healthy participants under 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 mg apomorphine or placebo drug. Transcranial magnetic stimulation-elicited motor-evoked potentials were used to monitor motor cortical excitability alterations. We hypothesized that, similar to L-DOPA, apomorphine will affect motor cortex plasticity. The results showed that apomorphine with the applied dosages has an inhibitory effect for focal and nonfocal LTP-like and LTD-like plasticity, which was either abolished, diminished or reversed. The detrimental effect on plasticity induction under all dosages of apomorphine suggests a predominantly presynaptic mechanism of action of these dosages.

Levodopa Effect on Basal Ganglia Motor Circuit in Parkinson's Disease

AIMS

To investigate the effects of levodopa on the basal ganglia motor circuit (BGMC) in Parkinson's disease (PD).

METHODS

Thirty PD patients with asymmetrical bradykinesia and 30 control subjects were scanned using resting-state functional MRI. Functional connectivity of the BGMC was measured and compared before and after levodopa administration in patients with PD. The correlation between improvements in bradykinesia and changes in BGMC connectivity was examined.

RESULTS

In the PD-off state (before medication), the posterior putamen and internal globus pallidus (GPi) had decreased connectivity while the subthalamic nucleus (STN) had enhanced connectivity within the BGMC relative to control subjects. Levodopa administration increased the connectivity of posterior putamen- and GPi-related networks but decreased the connectivity of STN-related networks. Improvements in bradykinesia were correlated with enhanced connectivity of the posterior putamen-cortical motor pathway and with decreased connectivity of the STN-thalamo-cortical motor pathway.

CONCLUSION

In PD patients with asymmetrical bradykinesia, levodopa can partially normalize the connectivity of the BGMC with a larger effect on the more severely affected side. Moreover, the beneficial effect of levodopa on bradykinesia is associated with normalization of the striato-thalamo-cortical motor and STN-cortical motor pathways. Our findings inform the neural mechanism of levodopa treatment in PD.

The Human Experience with Intravenous Levodopa

Objective: To compile a comprehensive summary of published human experience with levodopa given intravenously, with a focus on information required by regulatory agencies.

Background: While safe intravenous (IV) use of levodopa has been documented for over 50 years, regulatory supervision for pharmaceuticals given by a route other than that approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has become increasingly cautious. If delivering a drug by an alternate route raises the risk of adverse events, an investigational new drug (IND) application is required, including a comprehensive review of toxicity data.

Methods: Over 200 articles referring to IV levodopa were examined for details of administration, pharmacokinetics, benefit, and side effects.

Results: We identified 142 original reports describing IVLD use in humans, beginning with psychiatric research in 1959–1960 before the development of peripheral decarboxylase inhibitors. At least 2760 subjects have received IV levodopa, and reported outcomes include parkinsonian signs, sleep variables, hormone levels, hemodynamics, CSF amino acid composition, regional cerebral blood flow, cognition, perception and complex behavior. Mean pharmacokinetic variables were summarized for 49 healthy subjects and 190 with Parkinson's disease. Side effects were those expected from clinical experience with oral levodopa and dopamine agonists. No articles reported deaths or induction of psychosis.

Conclusion: At least 2760 patients have received IV levodopa with a safety profile comparable to that seen with oral administration.

Asymmetrical effect of levodopa on the neural activity of motor regions in PD

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative illness often characterized by asymmetrical symptoms. However, the reason for this asymmetry and the cerebral correlates underlying symptom asymmetry are still not well understood. Furthermore, the effects of levodopa on the cerebral correlates of disease asymmetry have not been investigated. In this study, right-handed PD patients performed self-initiated, externally triggered and repetitive control finger movements with both their right and left hands during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate asymmetrical effects of levodopa on the hemodynamic correlates of finger movements. Patients completed two experimental sessions OFF and ON medication after a minimum of 12 hours medication withdrawal. We compared the effect of levodopa on the neural activation patterns underlying the execution of both the more affected and less affected hand for self-initiated and externally triggered movements. Our results show that levodopa led to larger differences in cerebral activity for movements of the more affected, left side: there were significant differences in activity after levodopa administration in regions of the motor cortico-striatal network when patients performed self-initiated and externally triggered movements with their left hand. By contrast, when patients used their right hand, levodopa led to differences in cerebellar activity only. As our patients were affected more severely on their left side, we propose that levodopa may help provide additional dopaminergic input, improving movements for the more severely affected side. These results suggest that the impact of reduced dopamine in the cortico-striatal system and the action of levodopa is not symmetrical.

Treatment of levodopa-induced motor complications

Chronic levodopa treatment for Parkinson's disease patients is frequently associated with the development of motor complications such as end-of-dose wearing-off and dyskinesias. In this review, we provide an overview of the strategies available for dealing with these problems. Medical management includes manipulation of levodopa dosing to establish the optimum treatment schedule, improving levodopa absorption, catechol-O-methyl transferase-inhibition (COMT), Monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) inhibition, dopaminergic agonists, amantadine, and continuous dopaminergic infusions. Surgical procedures and particularly deep brain stimulation are also reviewed. It should be noted that none of these treatments has been shown to provide anti-parkinsonian efficacy that is greater than what can be achieved with levodopa. We highlight the importance of initiating therapy with a treatment strategy that reduces the risk that a Parkinson's disease patient will develop motor complications in the first place. Key Words: Advanced PD, dyskinesias, motor fluctuations, levodopa, dopamine agonists, COMT inhibitors, MAO-B inhibitors.

Apomorphin bei der Behandlung des Morbus Parkinson

Apomorphine has long been used in many medical specialties. It is a highly potent D2-, D3- and D4-dopamine receptor agonist with a particularly high D1-dopamine receptor affinity. Due to its almost complete inactivation during liver passage it is usually applied subcutaneously. After rapid onset its effect is waning after about one hour. Apomorphine's action is not dependent on enteral dopamine resorption and on praesynaptic dopamine storage and dopamine secretion mechanisms. When applied subcutaneously its most common side effect is cutaneous nodules at the injection sites. Peripheral dopaminergic side effects, such as nausea and orthostatic hypotension, usually occur only during therapy initiation and respond well to domperidone. Hallucinations occur less frequently than with other dopamine receptor agonists. The apomorphine test determines the levodopasensitivity of a parkinsonian syndrome by application of an apomorphine bolus to distinguish between idiopathic Parkinson's disease and atypical parkinsonian syndromes. It indicates a levodopasensitivity in about 90% of the patients tested. False-negative results can occur in mild parkinsonian syndromes. A meta analysis indicates that intermittent subutaneous apomorphine applications (intermittent apomorphine therapy) with a self application device can reduce the daily duration of unpredictable off-phases by 48.8+/-8.7%. For this an average of 3.7+/-1.1 x 2.9+/-0.8 mg apomorphine has to be applied per day. Continuous subcutaneous apomorphine application with an extracorporal pump (continuous apomorhine therapy) during the wake phase reduces the duration of daily off-phases by 64.8+/-13.5% and the additional levodopa dose by 30.3+/-31.1%. 24-hour application reduces the daily duration of the off-phases by 63.5+/-19.1% and the additional levodopa dose by 65.5+/-21.9%. Levodopa-induced dyskinesias are also substantially reduced. A gradual conversion to an apomorphine monotherapy is possible. Even after prolonged treatment times no significant loss of efficacy occurs. With this profile apomorphine is a highly successful treatment option for off-phases and levodopa-induced dyskinesias in advanced cases of idiopathic Parkinson's disease which should be used before more invasive approaches are considered.

The long-acting dopamine receptor agonist cabergoline in early Parkinson's disease: final results of a 5-year, double-blind, levodopa-controlled study

OBJECTIVES

Cabergoline is an ergoline derivative with a very long half-life that allows once-daily administration and the potential for more continuous stimulation of dopaminergic receptors than is possible with other dopamine receptor agonists (DAs). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the possible advantage resulting from a more sustained dopaminergic effect of cabergoline would translate into delayed onset of motor complications, compared with levodopa, in patients with newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This study was a double-blind, multicentre trial that compared cabergoline and levodopa as initial therapy for Parkinson's disease. A total of 419 levodopa-, DA- and selegiline-naive patients with newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease were randomised to receive either cabergoline (n = 211) or levodopa (n = 209). Treatment was titrated to an optimal dose over a period of up to 24 weeks and then continued at this dose until the study endpoint (confirmed motor complications) or up to a maximum of 5 years. At years 1-5, the cabergoline group was receiving cabergoline at average daily doses ranging from 2.8-2.9 mg, with added levodopa at mean daily doses ranging from 322 mg at year 1 to 431 mg at year 5; over the same period, the levodopa group was receiving daily levodopa doses of 784 mg. Thus, patients in the cabergoline group received <50% levodopa than patients in the levodopa group.

RESULTS

Motor complications were significantly delayed (p = 0.0175) and occurred less frequently in cabergoline-treated patients than in levodopa-treated patients (22.3% vs 33.7%). Cox model proportional hazards regression analysis showed that the relative risk of developing such complications was >50% lower (0.46; p < 0.001) in the cabergoline group compared with the levodopa group. In particular, development of dyskinesias was markedly delayed in the cabergoline group and occurred in 9.5% of patients compared with 21.2% in the levodopa group (p < 0.001). Among patients not requiring supplemental levodopa, the frequency of motor complications was three times higher with levodopa (15.5% of 110 patients) than with cabergoline (5.3% of 76 patients). Among patients who did need supplemental levodopa, motor complications were more frequent in the levodopa arm (54.1% of 98 patients) than in the cabergoline arm (31.9% of 135 patients). Consistent improvements relative to baseline in average Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) daily living activities and motor function sections, and in Clinical Global Impression severity of illness and physician- and patient- rated global improvement scores, were seen in both treatment groups, with maximal effects occurring within 2 years. However, levodopa treatment was associated with a significantly (p < 0.001) greater improvement in motor disability (as measured by the UPDRS motor score) over time, with mean values of 13.8 versus 12.9 in the cabergoline versus levodopa arm recorded at 1 year, 18.6 versus 17.2 at 3 years and 19.2 versus 16.3 at 5 years, respectively. While the overall frequency of adverse events was similar in the two groups, the cabergoline-treated group experienced marginally, but not significantly, higher frequencies of nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia and gastritis (37.4% vs 32.2% in the levodopa group) and of dizziness and postural hypotension (31.3% vs 24% in the levodopa group). Cabergoline-treated patients also experienced a significantly higher frequency of peripheral oedema (16.1% vs 3.4%, respectively; p < 0.0001). The cabergoline and levodopa groups had similar rates of sleepiness (17.5% vs 18.3%, respectively) and hallucinations (4.8% vs 4.4%, respectively); in an elderly population subset, hallucinations were reported in 7.1% and 6.5% of patients taking cabergoline and levodopa, respectively. Adverse events generally occurred more frequently in female patients (with the exception of dyskinesias, hyperkinesias and hallucinations, which occurred more frequently in men) and in the elderly.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that, compared with levodopa, initial therapy with cabergoline in patients with Parkinson's disease is associated with a lower risk of response fluctuations at the cost of a marginally reduced symptomatic improvement and some tolerability disadvantages that are mostly limited to a significantly higher frequency of peripheral oedema.

Subcutaneous Apomorphine

Apomorphine, a short-acting dopamine D1 and D2 receptor agonist, was the first dopamine receptor agonist used to treat Parkinson's disease. Subcutaneous apomorphine is currently used for the management of sudden, unexpected and refractory levodopa-induced 'off' states in fluctuating Parkinson's disease either as intermittent rescue injections or continuous infusions. Other indications include the challenge test for determining the dopaminergic responsiveness and finding the appropriate dose of the drug in intermittent subcutaneous administration. Except for a rapid on- and offset of the antiparkinsonian response with subcutaneous apomorphine, the magnitude and pattern of the motor response to single dose of subcutaneously administered apomorphine is qualitatively comparable to that of oral levodopa. Seventy-five percent of patients achieve a clinically significant improvement with a dose of apomorphine 4mg. The efficacy of intermittent subcutaneous apomorphine injections as an add-on to levodopa therapy in advanced Parkinson's disease was explored in one short-term, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, one short-term and six long-term, open-label, uncontrolled studies, including a total of 195 patients. These studies provide evidence that this mode of administration was successful in aborting 'off' periods and improving Parkinson's disease motor scores, but tended to increase dyskinesias. No levodopa-sparing effect was observed. Eleven long-term, open-label, uncontrolled studies, including a total of 233 patients evaluated the efficacy of continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusions in monotherapy or as an add-on to levodopa therapy in advanced Parkinson's disease. These studies proved that subcutaneous apomorphine infusions are successful in aborting 'off' periods, reducing dyskinesias and improving Parkinson's disease motor scores with the added benefit of a substantial levodopa-sparing effect. The apomorphine challenge test has at least 80% overall predictive ability to clinically diagnose Parkinson's disease across the different stages of the disease and parkinsonian syndromes. Similarly, those data also indicate that the apomorphine challenge test has a >80% ability to predict dopaminergic responsiveness across all stages of Parkinson's disease. Adverse events are usually mild and consist predominantly of cutaneous reactions and neuropsychiatric adverse effects. The incidence of adverse effects is higher in patients receiving continuous infusion than in those receiving intermittent pulsatile administration. Based on the results of these studies it is recommended that subcutaneous apomorphine either as intermittent injections or continuous infusions should be offered to any suitable Parkinson's disease patient who has difficulties in his/her management with conventional therapy. Low-dose levodopa therapy in combination with waking-day hours subcutaneous apomorphine infusion would probably be the most efficient treatment. Continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusions should be evaluated before more invasive measures or neurosurgical interventions are contemplated.

Prevention and treatment of motor fluctuations

The symptoms of Parkinson's disease can become increasingly difficult to control as the disease advances, particularly with the development of motor complications, such as end-of-dose wearing-off and dyskinesias, following long-term therapy. At this stage, the patient is frequently referred to a Parkinson's disease specialist for advice on the management of their disease. In this review we provide an overview of the Parkinson's disease specialist's strategies for coping with such problems. This includes strategy to prevent or delay motor fluctuations and the concept of the long duration response. The paper also includes establishing the optimum and most rational levodopa treatment schedule, improving levodopa absorption, use of COMT-inhibition, the addition of oral dopaminergic agonists, and the use of subcutaneous injections or infusions of apomorphine or lisuride. Finally, we highlight the increasing importance of treatment strategies that stimulate dopamine receptors in a more continuous, less pulsatile manner as a way of reducing the risk of developing treatment-associated motor complications.

Accuracy of acute levodopa challenge for clinical prediction of sustained long-term levodopa response as a major criterion for idiopathic Parkinson's disease diagnosis

Clinical idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) diagnosis requires following strict clinical criteria. Final definitive diagnosis can only be made after pathological confirmation and, despite following clinical criteria, several cases are misdiagnosed. We assessed sensitivity and specificity of acute challenge with levodopa (L-dopa) to predict sustained long-term L-dopa responsiveness as a major criterion for clinical diagnosis of PD. A consecutive series of 82 patients first seen at a movement disorders clinic with a parkinsonian syndrome without specific diagnosis was included. A second examiner, blind to the presumptive diagnosis, performed in each patient an acute challenge with 250/50 mg of L-dopa-carbidopa and rated the test as positive or negative according to whether values reached a minimal 30% of improvement on UPDRS scores. Positive tests were considered supportive of presumptive clinical diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. Blind to test results and according to clinical presumption, the first examiner started patient treatment with the necessary L-dopa dose or, alternatively, until reaching 1 g for 1 month in those who failed to display a positive test response. At 24 month follow-up, they were re-tested with 1 g for 1 month when required. At this point, clinical criteria of the U.K. Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank were applied and definitive clinical diagnosis of PD was made. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive ratio for acute challenge were calculated. Overall sensitivity and specificity of acute L-dopa challenge to predict clinical diagnosis of PD was 70.9% and 81.4%, respectively; positive predictive ratio was 88.6%. When patients were divided into three groups according to their UPDRS motor section score at initial examination, sensitivity and specificity varied: Group I (<or= 10), 71.4% and 100%; Group II (11-20), 75% and 75%; and Group III (>or=21), 36.4% and 87%, respectively. Positive predictive ratio increased to 100% in Group I and to 87.5% in Group III. The positive result of initial acute L-dopa challenge predicts chronic L-dopa responsiveness as major criterion of PD in all patients with UPDRS motor scores lower than 10.

Consensus statement on the role of acute dopaminergic challenge in Parkinson's disease

Available evidence on the practice of acute pharmacological challenge tests in parkinsonian patients was reviewed by a committee of experts, which achieved a general consensus. The published data deal mainly with the acute administration of levodopa and apomorphine in Parkinson's disease. Such challenge may serve different purposes, e.g., research, diagnosis, or tailoring of treatment. Unique protocols describing the clinical setting and practice parameters are not available. The present paper describes the scientific background and supplies practical guidelines, whenever possible, to perform and evaluate acute challenge tests in parkinsonian syndromes. With the appropriate indication and setting, acute challenge tests are useful in diagnosis and therapy of Parkinson's disease and related disorders.

Levodopa motor complications in Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is an age-related neurodegenerative disorder with an average onset age of 60 years. In the United States, approximately one million persons suffer from PD, and there are 60,000 newly diagnosed cases every year. The estimated cost of PD to society is $27 billion per year. Based on United States Census Bureau projections, it is estimated that the frequency of PD will increase fourfold by the year 2040, making it an even larger burden on patients, their families and society.

New, selective catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors as therapeutic agents in Parkinson's disease

Levodopa remains the most effective drug for Parkinson's disease (PD). However, its benefits are limited owing to extensive metabolism by catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT), especially if levodopa is used in combination with peripheral dopa-decarboxylase inhibitors. A new generation of potent, orally active, selective, and reversible COMT inhibitors has become available recently. Among these, tolcapone and entacapone have been best characterised. Preclinical and clinical studies have shown that COMT inhibitors markedly enhance levodopa availability and prolong its plasma half-life. In recent large clinical trials they proved to be able to ameliorate motor fluctuations, reduce disability, and decrease levodopa requirements in PD patients. The tolerability profiles of entacapone and tolcapone are good. COMT inhibition promises to become an important means of extending the benefits of levodopa therapy in PD.

Subcutaneous apomorphine in late stage Parkinson's disease: a long term follow up

OBJECTIVES

Despite the recent introduction of new peroral drugs as well as neurosurgical methods for Parkinson's disease, treatment of late stage parkinsonian patients remains difficult and many patients become severely handicapped because of fluctuations in their motor status. Injections and infusions of apomorphine has been suggested as an alternative in the treatment of these patients, but the number of studies describing the effects of such a treatment over longer time periods is still limited. The objective was to investigate the therapeutic response and range of side effects during long term treatment with apomorphine in advanced Parkinson's disease.

METHODS

Forty nine patients (30 men, 19 women; age range 42-80 years) with Parkinson's disease were treated for 3 to 66 months with intermittent subcutaneous injections or continuous infusions of apomorphine.

RESULTS

Most of the patients experienced a long term symptomatic improvement. The time spent in "off" was significantly reduced from 50 to 29.5% with injections and from 50 to 25% with infusions of apomorphine. The quality of the remaining "off" periods was improved with infusion treatment, but was relatively unaffected by apomorphine injections. The overall frequency and intensity of dyskinesias did not change. The therapeutic effects of apomorphine were stable over time. The most common side effect was local inflammation at the subcutaneous infusion site, whereas the most severe were psychiatric side effects occurring in 44% of the infusion and 12% of the injection treated patients.

CONCLUSION

Subcutaneous apomorphine is a highly effective treatment which can substantially improve the symptomatology in patients with advanced stage Parkinson's disease over a prolonged period of time.

Early treatment of Parkinson's disease with cabergoline delays the onset of motor complications. Results of a double-blind levodopa controlled trial. The PKDS009 Study Group

This multicentre randomised double-blind 3- to 5-year trial was designed to assess whether initial therapy with cabergoline alone or in combination with levodopa prevents or delays the occurrence of long term motor complications in patients with early Parkinson's disease. Patients eligible for study inclusion (n = 412) had early idiopathic Parkinson's disease (Hoehn and Yahr stages 1 to 3) and had received no previous treatment with levodopa, selegiline or dopamine agonists. Patients were randomised to receive either cabergoline (0.25 to 4 mg once daily) or levodopa (100 to 600 mg/day) titrated over a maximum period of 24 weeks. Once the optimum or maximum tolerated dose was achieved, it was maintained up to the end-point (development of motor complications confirmed at 2 consecutive 3-month visits) or up to a minimum of 3 years' treatment. Open labelled levodopa was added in both treatment arms when the improvement in motor disability [Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) factor III] decreased below 30% vs baseline. Both treatments improved motor disability, decreasing UPDRS factor III scores and factor II scores for activities of daily living. The development of motor complications (end-point) was significantly less frequent in patients treated with cabergoline than in levodopa recipients (22% vs 34%; p < 0.02). The relative risk of developing motor complications during treatment with cabergoline was more than 50% lower than with levodopa. Serious adverse events, either drug related or not, were slightly more frequent in cabergoline-treated patients (31%) than in those treated with levodopa (25%). The withdrawal rate in the cabergoline vs levodopa group was 16 vs 13%. In conclusion, the study shows that, in patients with early Parkinson's disease, cabergoline is effective either as monotherapy or combined with levodopa. Moreover, starting treatment with cabergoline significantly delays the development of motor complications.

Modulation of levodopa-induced motor response complications by NMDA antagonists in Parkinson's disease

The complex dopamine-glutamate interactions within the basal ganglia are disrupted by chronic nigrostriatal denervation and standard replacement therapy with levodopa. Acute N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor blockade is able to overcome the changes in dopamine D1- and D2-dependent responses and the progressive shortening in the duration of response induced by long-term exposure to levodopa in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats. Preliminary results further suggest that NMDA receptor blockade can counteract levodopa-induced dyskinesias in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-lesioned non-human primates and parkinsonian patients without substantially altering the motor benefit derived from levodopa. These results appear to be in accordance with our 2-deoxyglucose studies in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats showing that NMDA receptor blockade can attenuate many of the changes in synaptic activity induced by levodopa, particularly in the striatopallidal complex. Taken together, our observations suggest that abnormal glutamate transmission or dysregulation of NMDA receptor-mediated mechanisms contribute to levodopa-induced motor response complications. Additional preclinical and clinical experiments need to be completed with well tolerated glutamate antagonists to determine the full potential of glutamate receptor blockade as a long-term strategy against levodopa-related motor response complications in Parkinson's disease.

Clinical and pharmacological differences in early- versus late-onset Parkinson's disease

We evaluated whether patients with early-onset Parkinson's disease (EOPD) have a different clinical profile and pharmacological response than those with late-onset disease (LOPD). We performed a retrospective analysis and an acute pharmacological challenge with L-Dopa in 34 EOPD (age at onset between 21 and 40 years) and 34 LOPD (onset after age 60) patients. All patients completed a structured questionnaire cross-checked against medical record charts and underwent an acute levodopa test. Most significant differences were in the mode of onset, time of diagnosis, and degree of initial improvement. We did not observe differences with regard to motor fluctuations. The acute levodopa test showed no differences in latency to response onset between groups. However, the magnitude of the response was greater and the duration shorter in EOPD patients. Younger patients had greater reductions in bradykinesia scores, whereas posture/gait symptomatology was less responsive in older patients. The type and severity of dyskinesias also differed significantly between groups. Our findings suggest that central pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and possibly, nondopaminergic systems play a role in the age-related differences observed in Parkinson's disease.

Motor response to acute dopaminergic challenge with apomorphine and levodopa in Parkinson's disease: implications for the pathogenesis of the on-off phenomenon

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the contribution of postsynaptic changes to motor fluctuations, three groups of parkinsonian patients with differing responses to treatment were acutely challenged with two dopaminergic drugs-apomorphine and levodopa-having different mechanisms of action.

METHODS

Forty two patients with Parkinson's disease (14 untreated, eight with a stable response to levodopa, and 20 with levodopa induced motor fluctuations) were challenged on two consecutive days with apomorphine and levodopa. The latency, duration, and magnitude of motor response was measured.

RESULTS

A progressive shortening of mean latency after levodopa challenge was found passing from the untreated to the stable and fluctuating groups; the difference between untreated and fluctuating patients was statistically significant (P < 0.01). Response duration after levodopa challenge was similar in untreated and stable patients, whereas it showed a significant shortening in patients with motor fluctuations (P < 0.05 v both untreated and stable patients). When subcutaneous apomorphine was given, untreated patients had a longer response duration than those who had developed motor fluctuations (P < 0.05). Although baseline disability was significantly greater in the fluctuating patients than in the untreated and stable patients, the severity of residual parkinsonian signs after both apomorphine and levodopa challenge was similar for all three groups; as a result, the degree of improvement in parkinsonian signs after dopaminergic stimulation was substantially greater in more advanced than in early cases. Linear regression analysis also indicated that latency and duration after apomorphine challenge did not significantly correlate with those after levodopa challenge, whereas magnitude of response to apomorphine showed a strong positive correlation with that after levodopa challenge (r = 0.9, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The progressive shortening of motor response after both apomorphine and levodopa suggests that pharmacodynamic factors play an important part in determining the duration of motor response and argue against altered central pharmacokinetics of levodopa being principally responsible for the on-off effect. The widening response amplitude and increasing off phase disability occurring during disease progression are also critical factors in determining the appearance of motor fluctuations.

Sustained-release of levodopa: single dose study of a new formulation

Motor fluctuations and dyskinesias in Parkinsonian patients may be at least partially due to fluctuations of levodopa plasma concentrations. Sustained-release (SR) formulations of levodopa may present a promising, effective solution of this problem. Therefore we performed a 4-fold, cross-over double-blind trial with a new SR preparation, tested in healthy volunteers (Gerlach et al., 1988) before, in 12 Parkinsonian subjects. Two different dosages of the pure new levodopa SR-preparation, a composition of 70% SR and 30% levodopa immediate release (IR) and a conventional IR levodopa preparation were compared by their pharmacokinetic behaviour and their clinical effects. The relative bioavailability of levodopa in plasma was 69% for the combination of SR and IR levodopa release, for the pure SR formulations (100 mg levodopa) 54% and (200 mg levodopa) 55%, compared to the 100% of the standard form of IR release of 100 mg levodopa. In contrast to the conventional IR formulation the pharmacokinetic behaviour of the SR preparations showed no initial sharp peak, but more continuous and longer maintaining plasma concentrations of levodopa. Due to the small numbers of cases and the missing homogenity of the selected patients no statistical significant differences between the four preparations regarding the clinical response were observed. But the described pharmacokinetic behaviour gives hope, that these newly developed SR-preparations may lead to progress in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (prolongation of dosage intervals, reduction of motor fluctuations).

The response to levodopa in Parkinson's disease: imposing pharmacological law and order

The seemingly unpredictable response to levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease can be understood as an interaction between several distinct pharmacological effects of levodopa. The most important are a short-duration response with a half-life of minutes to hours and a long-duration response with a half-life of days, superimposed on diurnal motor variation. A negative response characterized by brief worsening before and after the short-duration response and dyskinesia accentuate the short-duration response. These various responses are modified by disease progression and long-term levodopa therapy. Pharmacodynamic modeling of the short-duration response indicates that with time, the response becomes less graded and small changes in levodopa concentrations can produce big changes in response. In this setting, unpredictability arises from the variation in absorption and distribution of levodopa.

The role of pulsatile versus continuous dopamine receptor stimulation for functional recovery in Parkinson's disease

More effective measures to control and replace the dopaminergic deficit of Parkinson's disease are being actively sought. One basic problem is how the striatal dopamine loss should be replaced in order to mimic most accurately the physiological state. Animal electrophysiology indicates that the dopaminergic nigrostriatal pathway has a dual tonic and phasic action. Intermittent dopaminergic stimulation is associated with behavioural hyposensitivity both in animal models and in patients with Parkinson's disease. Continuous dopaminergic stimulation provides a tonic background and improves some clinical problems but is also associated with tolerance. None of the available pharmacological approaches can restore the dopamine deficiency of Parkinson's disease to physiological levels. Continuous dopaminergic stimulation for < 24 h, associated with small doses of levodopa or a short-acting dopamine agonist, appears to be the best, albeit imperfect, therapeutic approach until other, more efficacious remedies are developed.