1
|
Rensink M, Bolt I, Schermer M. Predicting age of onset and progression of disease in late-onset genetic neurodegenerative diseases: An ethics review and research agenda. Eur J Hum Genet 2024:10.1038/s41431-024-01688-7. [PMID: 39317749 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-024-01688-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2024] [Revised: 08/15/2024] [Accepted: 08/15/2024] [Indexed: 09/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Currently, a prognostic biomarker-based model is being developed to predict the onset and disease progression of Huntington's Disease (HD) and Spinocerebellar Ataxia (SCA) types 1 and 3, both late-onset genetic neurodegenerative diseases lacking a disease-modifying treatment (DMT). The need for more accurate predictions of onset and disease progression arises in the context of clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of potential DMTs and identifying the optimal time to initiate such a DMT. Moreover, such a prognostic model may provide mutation carriers with personal utility. The aim of this article is to anticipate the ethical issues raised by these new prognostic models and to formulate the ethical issues that need to be addressed to facilitate an ethically responsible development and implementation of such a model. Part one of this article describes the ethical issues raised by presymptomatic genetic testing for HD and evaluates whether and how these issues may also occur by predicting onset and disease progression. Part two presents the results of a critical interpretative review into the ethical issues raised by biomarker testing in other late-onset neurodegenerative diseases lacking a DMT. The review aims to identify new ethical issues related to biomarker testing for predicting the onset and disease progression of HD and SCA. Finally, based on parts one and two, part three proposes a research agenda for the near future regarding the most pressing ethical issues that need to be addressed to ensure an ethically responsible implementation of such a prognostic model in both research settings and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Rensink
- Dept. of Medical Ethics, Philosophy, and History of Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Ineke Bolt
- Dept. of Medical Ethics, Philosophy, and History of Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje Schermer
- Dept. of Medical Ethics, Philosophy, and History of Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bogaert B, Crevier MJ, Roth C, Jox RJ, Barazzetti G. Research participant perceptions of personal utility in disclosure of individual research results from genomic analysis. J Community Genet 2024:10.1007/s12687-024-00734-7. [PMID: 39292430 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-024-00734-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 09/04/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024] Open
Abstract
This article elaborates research participant perspectives on the communication of individual research results from genomic analyses. While most analyses focus on how to communicate results from the perspectives of clinicians or researchers, there is insufficient data on user perspectives and how this information may be used, valued, and interpreted by patients and their families. The concept of personal utility, which considers factors related to quality of life, including on how information may impact the person's future decisions, has been shown to be particularly relevant to understand research participant perspectives and to move beyond clinical and analytic utility factors such as mortality and morbidity. This article draws from qualitative research of research participants awaiting genomic results in the case of sudden cardiac death. Our results show perspectives of personal utility in communication of genomic results, including cognitive, behavioral, and affective outcomes. Cognitive outcomes include gain of information, improved knowledge of etiology and inheritance characteristics, and curiosity for what might be found. Behavioral outcomes include being able to plan life decisions, while affective outcomes include various coping strategies used. We will also discuss the value of knowing negative results and incidental findings from the research participant's perspective. This contribution gives suggestions on best practices to guide genome analysis returns, including incorporating participant wishes on individualized communication at the consent stage; developing relational autonomy approaches; and engaging them throughout the research trajectory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenda Bogaert
- Institut des humanités en médecine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Marie-Josée Crevier
- Unité de consentement à la recherche, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Cindy Roth
- Unité de consentement à la recherche, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ralf J Jox
- Institut des humanités en médecine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Onstwedder SM, Jansen ME, Cornel MC, Rigter T. Policy Guidance for Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Services: Framework Development Study. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26:e47389. [PMID: 39018558 PMCID: PMC11292153 DOI: 10.2196/47389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The online offer of commercial genetic tests, also called direct-to-consumer genetic tests (DTC-GTs), enables citizens to gain insight into their health and disease risk based on their genetic profiles. DTC-GT offers often consist of a combination of services or aspects, including advertisements, information, DNA analysis, and medical or lifestyle advice. The risks and benefits of DTC-GT services have been debated and studied extensively, but instruments that assess DTC-GT services and aid policy are lacking. This leads to uncertainty among policy makers, law enforcers, and regulators on how to ensure and balance both public safety and autonomy and about the responsibilities these 3 parties have toward the public. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to develop a framework that outlines aspects of DTC-GTs that lead to policy issues and to help provide policy guidance regarding DTC-GT services. METHODS We performed 3 steps: (1) an integrative literature review to identify risks and benefits of DTC-GT services for consumers and society in Embase and Medline (January 2014-June 2022), (2) structuring benefits and risks in different steps of the consumer journey, and (3) development of a checklist for policy guidance. RESULTS Potential risks and benefits of DTC-GT services were mapped from 134 papers and structured into 6 phases. In summary, these phases were called the consumer journey: (1) exposure, (2) pretest information, (3) DNA analysis, (4) data management, (5) posttest information, and (6) individual and societal impact. The checklist for evaluation of DTC-GT services consisted of 8 themes, covering 38 items that may raise policy issues in DTC-GT services. The themes included the following aspects: general service content, validity and quality assurance, potential data and privacy risks, scientific evidence and robustness, and quality of the provided information. CONCLUSIONS Both the consumer journey and the checklist break the DTC-GT offer down into key aspects that may impact and compromise individual and public health, safety, and autonomy. This framework helps policy makers, regulators, and law enforcers develop methods to interpret, assess, and act in the DTC-GT service market.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Maria Onstwedder
- Department of Public Health Genomics and Screening, Centre for Health Protection, Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
- Section Community Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Personalized Medicine Programme, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marleen Elizabeth Jansen
- Department of Public Health Genomics and Screening, Centre for Health Protection, Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
- Section Community Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Personalized Medicine Programme, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Martina Cornelia Cornel
- Section Community Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Personalized Medicine Programme, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Tessel Rigter
- Department of Public Health Genomics and Screening, Centre for Health Protection, Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
- Section Community Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Personalized Medicine Programme, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cornelis C, Tibben A, Brilstra E, Bolt I, van Summeren M, Knoers N, Bredenoord AL. Hope, but never expect? Comparing parents' pre- and post-disclosure attitudes toward return of results from diagnostic exome sequencing for their child. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2024; 12:e2341. [PMID: 38366804 PMCID: PMC10958177 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.2341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Counseling for whole-exome sequencing (WES) could benefit from aligning parents' pre- and post-disclosure attitudes. A few studies have qualitatively compared parents' pre- and post-disclosure attitudes toward receiving WES results for their child in a diagnostic setting. This study explored these attitudes in the context of children with a developmental delay. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with parents (n = 27) of 16 children undergoing diagnostic WES in trio-analysis, both before and after receiving results. RESULTS Three key insights emerged. First, the distinction between hoping and expecting was relevant for shaping parents' experiences with receiving results related to the primary indication. Second, parents of young children whose development of autonomous capacities was uncertain sometimes found themselves in a situation resembling a Catch-22 when confronted with decisions about unsolicited findings (UFs): an important reason for consenting to WES was to gain a better picture of how the child might develop, but in order to make responsible choices about UFs, some ideas of their child's development is needed. Third, default opt-ins and opt-outs helped parents fathom new kinds of considerations for accepting or declining UFs in different categories, thereby aiding decision-making. CONCLUSION Results from this study are relevant for counseling and policy development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Candice Cornelis
- Department of GeneticsUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius CenterUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Aad Tibben
- Department of Clinical GeneticsLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Eva Brilstra
- Department of GeneticsUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Ineke Bolt
- Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of MedicineErasmus Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Marieke van Summeren
- Department of General PediatricsUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Nine Knoers
- Department of GeneticsUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
- Department of GeneticsUniversity Medical Centre GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Annelien L. Bredenoord
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius CenterUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
- Erasmus School of PhilosophyErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hamilton JG, Shah IH, Salafia C, Schofield E, Garzon MG, Cadet K, Stadler ZK, Hay JL, Offit K, Robson ME. Development of a novel measure of advanced cancer patients' perceived utility of secondary germline findings from tumor genomic profiling. PEC INNOVATION 2023; 2:100124. [PMID: 37214538 PMCID: PMC10194097 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Objective Tumor genomic profiling (TGP) can inform advanced cancer patients' treatment decisions, and also reveal secondary germline findings-information about inherited risks for cancer and other disorders. We sought to develop a measure of patient perceptions of the clinical and personal utility of secondary germline findings. Methods We developed a draft survey based on literature and patient interview data (n=40). We evaluated and refined the survey through cognitive interviews with advanced cancer patients who received secondary germline findings from TGP (n=10). The survey was psychometrically validated with data from two independent samples of advanced cancer patients undergoing TGP (total n=349). Results Cognitive interviews offered opportunities for survey refinement and confirmation of its comprehensible nature. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the survey identified 16 items across three subscales with strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ≥0.79): perceived utility for others, perceived utility for self and health, and confidence in secondary findings. Conclusion We developed a novel valid scale with promise for measuring advanced cancer patients' perceptions of the utility of secondary germline findings. Innovation We offer a new patient-derived measure of perceived utility of and confidence in secondary germline findings with potential applications for precision oncology research and clinical communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jada G. Hamilton
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ibrahim H. Shah
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Caroline Salafia
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Elizabeth Schofield
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Margaux Genoff Garzon
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kechna Cadet
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zsofia K. Stadler
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer L. Hay
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark E. Robson
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Furrer R, Barlevy D, Pereira S, Lázaro-Muñoz G. Curiosity and Uncertainty Resolution: Inflating the Perceived Utility of Genetic Information. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2023; 23:53-55. [PMID: 37339287 PMCID: PMC11234296 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2207518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
|
7
|
Dive L, Holmes I, Newson AJ. Is It Just for a Screening Program to Give People All the Information They Want? THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2023:1-9. [PMID: 37171853 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2207510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Genomic screening at population scale generates many ethical considerations. One is the normative role that people's preferences should play in determining access to genomic information in screening contexts, particularly information that falls beyond the scope of screening. We expect both that people will express a preference to receive such results and that there will be interest from the professional community in providing them. In this paper, we consider this issue in relation to the just and equitable design of population screening programs like reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS). Drawing on a pluralistic public health ethics perspective, we claim that generating and reporting information about genetic variants beyond the scope of the screening program usually lacks clinical, and perhaps personal, utility. There are both pragmatic and ethical reasons to restrict information provision to that which fits the stated purpose of the program.
Collapse
|
8
|
Laberge AM, Roy MC, Kleiderman E, Ravitsky V. Going Back to Basics: What is the Target of Prenatal Screening? THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2023; 23:50-52. [PMID: 36919551 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2169400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
|
9
|
Nguyen Dolphyn TT, Ormond KE, Weissman SM, Kim HJ, Reuter CM. Patient experiences with clinical confirmatory genetic testing after using direct-to-consumer raw DNA and third-party genetic interpretation services. Transl Behav Med 2023; 13:104-114. [PMID: 36327324 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibac083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The availability of raw DNA and genetic interpretation tools allow individuals to access genetic health risk information, where analytical false-positives exist. Little is known about the experience of individuals who receive pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant(s) through raw DNA interpretation and follow-up with clinical confirmatory genetic testing. This qualitative study set out to describe the experiences of individuals who pursued clinical confirmatory genetic testing, including their perception of the process. Participants were recruited from social media and eligible if they discovered a potential pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in a raw DNA interpretation report, completed clinical confirmatory genetic testing in the U.S., and provided documentation of those results. Individuals participated in semi-structured interviews, which were transcribed and inductively coded to identify themes. Of the 12 participants, 3 received clinical genetic testing results that confirmed pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants noted in raw DNA interpretation reports (confirmation positive), and 9 were not confirmed. Nearly all (n = 11) participants described emotional distress and information-seeking behavior as a coping mechanism after discovering a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in raw DNA interpretation. When pursuing confirmatory genetic testing, many (n = 9) faced challenges with finding knowledgeable healthcare providers and obtaining insurance coverage. Despite reporting concerns over raw DNA interpretation and a desire for more safeguards, almost all (n = 10) participants stated interest in using the service again. Overall, participants' experiences reveal they find personal utility in raw DNA interpretation results and provide insight into opportunities for patient and provider education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany T Nguyen Dolphyn
- Department of Genetics, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305USA.,Stanford Medicine Clinical Genomics Program, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305, USA
| | - Kelly E Ormond
- Department of Genetics, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305USA.,Department of Genetics and Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305, USA.,Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Science and Technology, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Helen J Kim
- Department of Genetics, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305USA
| | - Chloe M Reuter
- Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California, 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bowling KM, Thompson ML, Kelly MA, Scollon S, Slavotinek AM, Powell BC, Kirmse BM, Hendon LG, Brothers KB, Korf BR, Cooper GM, Greally JM, Hurst ACE. Return of non-ACMG recommended incidental genetic findings to pediatric patients: considerations and opportunities from experiences in genomic sequencing. Genome Med 2022; 14:131. [PMID: 36414972 PMCID: PMC9682742 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-022-01139-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The uptake of exome/genome sequencing has introduced unexpected testing results (incidental findings) that have become a major challenge for both testing laboratories and providers. While the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics has outlined guidelines for laboratory management of clinically actionable secondary findings, debate remains as to whether incidental findings should be returned to patients, especially those representing pediatric populations. METHODS The Sequencing Analysis and Diagnostic Yield working group in the Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research Consortium has collected a cohort of pediatric patients found to harbor a genomic sequencing-identified non-ACMG-recommended incidental finding. The incidental variants were not thought to be associated with the indication for testing and were disclosed to patients and families. RESULTS In total, 23 "non-ACMG-recommended incidental findings were identified in 21 pediatric patients included in the study. These findings span four different research studies/laboratories and demonstrate differences in incidental finding return rate across study sites. We summarize specific cases to highlight core considerations that surround identification and return of incidental findings (uncertainty of disease onset, disease severity, age of onset, clinical actionability, and personal utility), and suggest that interpretation of incidental findings in pediatric patients can be difficult given evolving phenotypes. Furthermore, return of incidental findings can benefit patients and providers, but do present challenges. CONCLUSIONS While there may be considerable benefit to return of incidental genetic findings, these findings can be burdensome to providers and present risk to patients. It is important that laboratories conducting genomic testing establish internal guidelines in anticipation of detection. Moreover, cross-laboratory guidelines may aid in reducing the potential for policy heterogeneity across laboratories as it relates to incidental finding detection and return. However, future discussion is required to determine whether cohesive guidelines or policy statements are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin M Bowling
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, 35806, USA
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | | | - Melissa A Kelly
- HudsonAlpha Clinical Services Lab, LLC, HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, USA
| | - Sarah Scollon
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Anne M Slavotinek
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Bradford C Powell
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Brian M Kirmse
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, 39216, USA
| | - Laura G Hendon
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, 39216, USA
| | - Kyle B Brothers
- Norton Children's Research Institute Affiliated with UofL School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA
| | - Bruce R Korf
- Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 25294, USA
| | - Gregory M Cooper
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, 35806, USA
| | - John M Greally
- Department of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA
| | - Anna C E Hurst
- Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 25294, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Alpinar-Sencan Z, Schicktanz S, Ulitsa N, Shefet D, Werner P. Moral motivation regarding dementia risk testing among affected persons in Germany and Israel. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2022; 48:861-867. [PMID: 34290115 PMCID: PMC9626915 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Recent advances in biomarkers may soon make it possible to identify persons at high risk for late-onset Alzheimer's disease at a presymptomatic (preclinical) stage. Popular demand for testing is increasing despite the lack of cure and effective prevention options and despite uncertainties regarding the predictive value of biomarker tests. This underscores the relevance of the ethical, cultural and social implications of predictive testing and the need to advance the bioethical debate beyond considerations of clinical consequences. Our qualitative study included three groups of affected persons: People with mild neurocognitive disorder, their relatives and family caregivers of people with dementia. We explored their moral motivations regarding predictive, biomarker-based testing and preclinical diagnostics. We interviewed affected individuals in Germany and Israel (N=88; 44 participants in each country). Transcripts of 12 focus groups and 12 semistructured interviews were content analysed with a focus on the moral motivations of affected persons in their justification of why they accept or reject predictive testing and early diagnosis. We grouped the underlying aspects of moral motivation into four ethical categories: beneficence as a form of personal utility focusing on well-being, the ties of responsibility linking families and their individual members, the importance of self-determination by later life planning and notions of a good life. In general, cultural parallels among these motives were very obvious. Cultural variation occurred mainly in openness to suicide, scepticism about test validity and emphasis on personal autonomy. The study underscores the importance of counselling for life-planning issues and of informing test candidates about problems with test validity and about the ambiguity of test results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zümrüt Alpinar-Sencan
- Department for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Niedersachsen, Germany
| | - Silke Schicktanz
- Department for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Niedersachsen, Germany
| | - Natalie Ulitsa
- Department of Community Mental Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| | - Daphna Shefet
- Shalvata Mental Health Care Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Perla Werner
- Department of Community Mental Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dive L, Newson AJ. Ethically robust reproductive genetic carrier screening needs to measure outcomes that matter to patients. Eur J Hum Genet 2022; 30:754-755. [PMID: 35581418 PMCID: PMC9259663 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01109-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Dive
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XThe University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia ,grid.117476.20000 0004 1936 7611Present Address: Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, NSW 2007 Broadway, Australia
| | - Ainsley J. Newson
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XThe University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Genomic health data generation in the UK: a 360 view. Eur J Hum Genet 2022; 30:782-789. [PMID: 34663916 PMCID: PMC8523282 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-00976-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
In the UK, genomic health data is being generated in three major contexts: the healthcare system (based on clinical indication), in large scale research programmes, and for purchasers of direct-to-consumer genetic tests. The recently delivered hybrid clinical/research programme, 100,000 Genomes Project set the scene for a new Genomic Medicine Service, through which the National Health Service aims to deliver consistent and equitable care informed by genomics, while providing data to inform academic and industry research and development. In parallel, a large scale research study, Our Future Health, has UK Government and Industry investment and aims to recruit 5 million volunteers to support research intended to improve early detection, risk stratification, and early intervention for chronic diseases. To explore how current models of genomic health data generation intersect, and to understand clinical, ethical, legal, policy and social issues arising from this intersection, we conducted a series of five multidisciplinary panel discussions attended by 28 invited stakeholders. Meetings were recorded and transcribed. We present a summary of issues identified: genomic test attributes; reasons for generating genomic health data; individuals' motivation to seek genomic data; health service impacts; role of genetic counseling; equity; data uses and security; consent; governance and regulation. We conclude with some suggestions for policy consideration.
Collapse
|
14
|
Moorthie S, Hall A, Babb de Villiers C, Janus J, Brigden T, Blackburn L, Kroese M. How can we address the uncertainties regarding the potential clinical utility of polygenic score-based tests? Per Med 2022; 19:263-270. [PMID: 35289204 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2021-0148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
As common low penetrance variants associated with diseases are uncovered, attempts continue to be made to harness this knowledge for improving healthcare. Polygenic scores have been developed as the mechanism by which knowledge of common variants can be used to investigate genetic contributions to disease risk. They serve as a biomarker to provide an estimate of the genetic liability for a particular disease. Discussion continues as to whether polygenic scores are a useful biomarker and their readiness for incorporation into clinical and public health practice. In this paper, we investigate the key challenges that need to be addressed, in the description and assessment of the clinical utility of polygenic score-based tests for use in clinical and public health practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sowmiya Moorthie
- PHG Foundation, University of Cambridge, 2 Worts Causeway, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK.,Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Forvie Site, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK
| | - Alison Hall
- PHG Foundation, University of Cambridge, 2 Worts Causeway, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | | | - Joanna Janus
- PHG Foundation, University of Cambridge, 2 Worts Causeway, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Tanya Brigden
- PHG Foundation, University of Cambridge, 2 Worts Causeway, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Laura Blackburn
- PHG Foundation, University of Cambridge, 2 Worts Causeway, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Mark Kroese
- PHG Foundation, University of Cambridge, 2 Worts Causeway, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cheung F, Birch P, Friedman JM, Elliott AM, Adam S. The long‐term impact of receiving incidental findings on parents undergoing genome‐wide sequencing. J Genet Couns 2022; 31:887-900. [DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2021] [Revised: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Faith Cheung
- Department of Medical Genetics Faculty of Medicine University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
| | - Patricia Birch
- Department of Medical Genetics Faculty of Medicine University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
- BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute Vancouver British Columbia Canada
| | - J. M. Friedman
- Department of Medical Genetics Faculty of Medicine University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
- BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute Vancouver British Columbia Canada
| | - Alison M Elliott
- Department of Medical Genetics Faculty of Medicine University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
- BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute Vancouver British Columbia Canada
- BC Women’s Health Research Institute Vancouver British Columbia Canada
| | - Shelin Adam
- Department of Medical Genetics Faculty of Medicine University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
- BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute Vancouver British Columbia Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Huang PH, Kim KH, Schermer M. Ethical Issues of Digital Twins for Personalized Health Care Service: Preliminary Mapping Study. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e33081. [PMID: 35099399 PMCID: PMC8844982 DOI: 10.2196/33081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The concept of digital twins has great potential for transforming the existing health care system by making it more personalized. As a convergence of health care, artificial intelligence, and information and communication technologies, personalized health care services that are developed under the concept of digital twins raise a myriad of ethical issues. Although some of the ethical issues are known to researchers working on digital health and personalized medicine, currently, there is no comprehensive review that maps the major ethical risks of digital twins for personalized health care services. OBJECTIVE This study aims to fill the research gap by identifying the major ethical risks of digital twins for personalized health care services. We first propose a working definition for digital twins for personalized health care services to facilitate future discussions on the ethical issues related to these emerging digital health services. We then develop a process-oriented ethical map to identify the major ethical risks in each of the different data processing phases. METHODS We resorted to the literature on eHealth, personalized medicine, precision medicine, and information engineering to identify potential issues and developed a process-oriented ethical map to structure the inquiry in a more systematic way. The ethical map allows us to see how each of the major ethical concerns emerges during the process of transforming raw data into valuable information. Developers of a digital twin for personalized health care service may use this map to identify ethical risks during the development stage in a more systematic way and can proactively address them. RESULTS This paper provides a working definition of digital twins for personalized health care services by identifying 3 features that distinguish the new application from other eHealth services. On the basis of the working definition, this paper further layouts 10 major operational problems and the corresponding ethical risks. CONCLUSIONS It is challenging to address all the major ethical risks that a digital twin for a personalized health care service might encounter proactively without a conceptual map at hand. The process-oriented ethical map we propose here can assist the developers of digital twins for personalized health care services in analyzing ethical risks in a more systematic manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei-Hua Huang
- Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ki-Hun Kim
- Department of Industrial Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Maartje Schermer
- Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pritchard D, Goodman C, Nadauld LD. Clinical Utility of Genomic Testing in Cancer Care. JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 6:e2100349. [PMID: 35085005 PMCID: PMC8830511 DOI: 10.1200/po.21.00349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
In the era of personalized medicine, physicians rely on their understanding of clinical utility to assess the value of rapidly evolving genetic and genomic tests. Current definitions of the clinical utility of genetic testing sufficiently capture a range of benefits and risks that derive from positive and negative results of tests that assess one gene or a few genes. However, these definitions of clinical utility are inadequate to recognize the wider scope of benefits that accrue from more comprehensive genomic tests, which can develop data sets that inform clinical decision making as well as population health and scientific advancement in novel ways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lincoln D Nadauld
- Precision Health and Genomics, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Halley MC, Young JL, Fernandez L, Kohler JN, Bernstein JA, Wheeler MT, Tabor HK. Perceived utility and disutility of genomic sequencing for pediatric patients: Perspectives from parents with diverse sociodemographic characteristics. Am J Med Genet A 2022; 188:1088-1101. [PMID: 34981646 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Given the limited therapeutic options for most rare diseases diagnosed through genomic sequencing (GS) and the proportion of patients who remain undiagnosed even after GS, it is important to characterize a broader range of benefits and potential harms of GS from the perspectives of families with diverse sociodemographic characteristics. We recruited parents of children enrolled in the Undiagnosed Diseases Network. Parents completed an in-depth interview, and we conducted a comparative content analysis of the data. Parents (n = 30) were demographically diverse, with 43.3% identifying as Hispanic, 33.3% primarily Spanish-speaking, and widely variable household income and education. Parents reported minimal changes in their child's health status following GS but did report a range of other forms of perceived utility, including improvements in their child's healthcare management and access, in their own psychological well-being, and in disease-specific social connections and research opportunities. Parents who received a diagnosis more frequently perceived utility across all domains; however, disutility also was reported by both those with and without a diagnosis. Impacts depended on multiple mediating factors, including parents' underlying expectations and beliefs, family sociodemographic characteristics, individual disease characteristics, and prior healthcare access. Our study suggests that the perceived utility of GS varies widely among parents and may depend on multiple individual, sociodemographic, and contextual factors that are relevant for pre- and post-GS counseling, for value assessment of GS, and for policymaking related to access to new genomic technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan C Halley
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Jennifer L Young
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Liliana Fernandez
- Stanford Center for Undiagnosed Diseases, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Jennefer N Kohler
- Stanford Center for Undiagnosed Diseases, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | | | - Jonathan A Bernstein
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Matthew T Wheeler
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Holly K Tabor
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Department of Medicine (and by courtesy, Department of Epidemiology), Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bowman-Smart H, Taylor-Sands M. Fetal information as shared information: using NIPT to test for adult-onset conditions. Monash Bioeth Rev 2021; 39:82-102. [PMID: 34971442 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-021-00142-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
The possibilities of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) are expanding, and the use of NIPT for adult-onset conditions may become widely available in the near future. If parents use NIPT to test for these conditions, and the pregnancy is continued, they will have information about the child's genetic predisposition from birth. In this paper, we argue that prospective parents should be able to access NIPT for an adult-onset condition, even when they have no intention to terminate the pregnancy. We begin by outlining the arguments against testing in such a situation, which generally apply the same considerations that apply in the predictive testing of a minor to the fetus in utero. We then contend, firstly, that there are important practical considerations that support availability of testing for prospective parents regardless of their stated intentions. Secondly, we object to the ethical equation of a fetus in utero with a minor. We base our analysis on a view of pregnancy that conceptualises the fetus as a part of the gestational parent, as opposed to the more common 'container' model of pregnancy. We suggest that fetal information is best conceptualised as shared information between the gestational parent and future child. Thus, it should be approached in similar ways as other kinds of shared information (such as genetic information with implications for family members), where a person has a claim over their own information, but should be encouraged to consider the interests of other relevant parties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilary Bowman-Smart
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, 50 Flemington Rd, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia. .,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Michelle Taylor-Sands
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, 50 Flemington Rd, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.,Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.,Victorian Mental Health Tribunal, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
West KM, Cavanaugh KL, Blacksher E, Fullerton SM, Umeukeje EM, Young B, Burke W. Stakeholder Perspectives on Returning Nonactionable Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) Genetic Results to African American Research Participants. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2021; 17:4-14. [PMID: 34870514 DOI: 10.1177/15562646211063267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The ethics of returning nonactionable genetic research results to individuals are unclear. Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) genetic variants are nonactionable, predominantly found in people of West African ancestry, and contribute to kidney disease disparities. To inform ethical research practice, we interviewed researchers, clinicians, and African American community members (n = 76) about the potential risks and benefits of returning APOL1 research results. Stakeholders strongly supported returning APOL1 results. Benefits include reciprocity for participants, community education and rebuilding trust in research, and expectation of future actionability. Risks include analytic validity, misunderstanding, psychological burdens, stigma and discrimination, and questionable resource tradeoffs. Conclusions: APOL1 results should be offered to participants. Responsibly fulfilling this offer requires careful identification of best communication practices, broader education about the topic, and ongoing community engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Erika Blacksher
- 7284University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.,Center for Practical Bioethics, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | | | | | - Bessie Young
- 7284University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.,20128VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Wylie Burke
- 7284University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0258646. [PMID: 34748551 PMCID: PMC8575249 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the plethora of empirical studies conducted to date, debate continues about whether and to what extent results should be returned to participants of genomic research. We aimed to systematically review the empirical literature exploring stakeholders’ perspectives on return of individual research results (IRR) from genomic research. We examined preferences for receiving or willingness to return IRR, and experiences with either receiving or returning them. The systematic searches were conducted across five major databases in August 2018 and repeated in April 2020, and included studies reporting findings from primary research regardless of method (quantitative, qualitative, mixed). Articles that related to the clinical setting were excluded. Our search identified 221 articles that met our search criteria. This included 118 quantitative, 69 qualitative and 34 mixed methods studies. These articles included a total number of 118,874 stakeholders with research participants (85,270/72%) and members of the general public (40,967/35%) being the largest groups represented. The articles spanned at least 22 different countries with most (144/65%) being from the USA. Most (76%) discussed clinical research projects, rather than biobanks. More than half (58%) gauged views that were hypothetical. We found overwhelming evidence of high interest in return of IRR from potential and actual genomic research participants. There is also a general willingness to provide such results by researchers and health professionals, although they tend to adopt a more cautious stance. While all results are desired to some degree, those that have the potential to change clinical management are generally prioritized by all stakeholders. Professional stakeholders appear more willing to return results that are reliable and clinically relevant than those that are less reliable and lack clinical relevance. The lack of evidence for significant enduring psychological harm and the clear benefits to some research participants suggest that researchers should be returning actionable IRRs to participants.
Collapse
|
22
|
Lee W, Luca S, Costain G, Snell M, Marano M, Curtis M, Dunsmore K, Veenma D, Walker S, Cohn RD, Marshall CR, Cohen E, Meyn MS, Orkin J, Hayeems RZ. Genome sequencing among children with medical complexity: What constitutes value from parents' perspective? J Genet Couns 2021; 31:523-533. [PMID: 34674352 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 10/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Genome sequencing (GS) has demonstrated high diagnostic yield in pediatric patients with complex, clinically heterogeneous presentations. Emerging evidence shows generally favorable experiences for patients and families receiving GS. As a result, implementation of GS in pediatrics is gaining momentum. To inform implementation, we conducted a qualitative study to explore the personal utility of GS for parents of children with medical complexity (CMC). GS was performed at an academic tertiary-care center for CMC for whom a genetic etiology was suspected. Following the return of GS results, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 parents about their child's diagnostic journey. Of the children whose parents were interviewed, six children received a diagnosis, two received a possible diagnosis, and six did not receive a diagnosis. A predominantly deductive thematic analysis approach to the interview data was used by applying Kohler's personal utility framework to understand affective, cognitive, behavioral and social impacts of GS. Both the diagnosed and undiagnosed groups experienced enhanced emotion-focused coping (affective). The diagnosed group experienced favorable utility related to knowledge of condition (cognitive) and communication with relatives (behavioral). A domain beyond Kohler's framework related to the presence or absence of GS impact on medical management was also described by parents. The deployment of GS late in the diagnostic odyssey and the limited knowledge available for the rare genetic disorders diagnosed in this cohort appeared to diminish the perceived utility of GS. As GS capabilities continue to evolve at a rapid pace and become available earlier in the diagnostic journey, it is important to consider the impact and timing of testing on parents of CMC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Whiwon Lee
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephanie Luca
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gregory Costain
- Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,The Centre for Applied Genomics and Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Genetics & Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Meaghan Snell
- Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maria Marano
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Service de pédiatrie générale, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Meredith Curtis
- Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kourtney Dunsmore
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danielle Veenma
- Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics: Developmental and Genetics, Erasmus MC Sophia, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Susan Walker
- The Centre for Applied Genomics and Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Genomics England, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Ronald D Cohn
- Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christian R Marshall
- The Centre for Applied Genomics and Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Paediatric Laboratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eyal Cohen
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - M Stephen Meyn
- Center for Human Genomics and Precision Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Julia Orkin
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robin Z Hayeems
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mozersky J, Hartz S, Linnenbringer E, Levin L, Streitz M, Stock K, Moulder K, Morris JC. Communicating 5-Year Risk of Alzheimer's Disease Dementia: Development and Evaluation of Materials that Incorporate Multiple Genetic and Biomarker Research Results. J Alzheimers Dis 2021; 79:559-572. [PMID: 33337371 DOI: 10.3233/jad-200993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitively normal (CN) older adults participating in Alzheimer's disease (AD) research increasingly ask for their research results-including genetic and neuroimaging findings-to understand their risk of developing AD dementia. AD research results are typically not returned for multiple reasons, including possible psychosocial harms of knowing one is at risk of a highly feared and untreatable disease. OBJECTIVE We developed materials that convey information about 5-year absolute risk of developing AD dementia based on research results. METHODS 20 CN older adults who received a research brain MRI result were interviewed regarding their wishes for research results to inform material development (Pilot 1). Following material development, 17 CN older adults evaluated the materials for clarity and acceptability (Pilot 2). All participants were community-dwelling older adults participating in longitudinal studies of aging at a single site. RESULTS Participants want information on their risk of developing AD dementia to better understand their own health, satisfy curiosity, inform family, and future planning. Some articulated concerns, but the majority wanted to know their risk despite the limitations of information. Participants found the educational materials and results report clear and acceptable, and the majority would want to know their research results after reviewing them. CONCLUSION These materials will be used in a clinical study examining the psychosocial and cognitive effects of offering research results to a cohort of CN older adults. Future AD research may incorporate the return of complex risk information to CN older adults, and materials are needed to communicate this information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Mozersky
- Bioethics Research Center, Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sarah Hartz
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Erin Linnenbringer
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Lillie Levin
- Bioethics Research Center, Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Marissa Streitz
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; and Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Kristin Stock
- Washington University Danforth College of Arts and Sciences (post-baccalaureate program) and Music Speaks, LLC
| | - Krista Moulder
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; and Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - John C Morris
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; and Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes following Genetic Testing for Familial Hypercholesterolemia, Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome, and Lynch Syndrome: A Systematic Review. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11090850. [PMID: 34575627 PMCID: PMC8467628 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11090850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and PRO measures (PROMs) are real-world evidence that can help capture patient experiences and perspectives regarding a clinical intervention such as genetic testing. Objective: To identify and capture methods and qualitative PRO themes among studies reporting PROs following genetic testing for FH, breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, and Lynch syndrome. Methods: A systematic review was conducted via PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Yale University’s TRIP Medical Databases on articles published by April 2021. Results: We identified 24 studies published between 1996 and 2021 representing 4279 participants that reported PROs following genetic testing for FH, breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, and Lynch syndrome. Studies collected and reported PROs from validated PROM instruments (n = 12; 50%), validated surveys (n = 7; 26%), and interviews (n = 10; 42%). PRO themes ranged across all collection methods (e.g., psychological, knowledge, coping and satisfaction, concern about stigma/discrimination, etc.). Conclusions: Important gaps identified include (1) most studies (n = 18; 75%) reported PROs following genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer, and (2) populations reporting PROs overall were largely of White/Caucasian/Northern European/Anglo-Saxon descent. We offer recommendations and describe real-world implications for the field moving forward.
Collapse
|
25
|
Tutty E, Amor DJ, Jarmolowicz A, Paton K, Downie L. Personal utility of genomic sequencing for infants with congenital deafness. Am J Med Genet A 2021; 185:3634-3643. [PMID: 34184819 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Decisions about genetic testing have traditionally been based on clinical utility and cost, but personal utility is increasingly recognized when assessing the value of testing. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was offered to a population cohort of 106 infants diagnosed with congenital hearing loss. Parents could choose to receive results relating to hearing loss only or also learn additional information about childhood-onset conditions (medically nonactionable and/or actionable). This study aimed to quantify the personal utility of WES for parents after a diagnosis of hearing loss in their child. Parents completed surveys pretest (63/106), after hearing loss results (52/106) and after receiving additional information (47/72). Open-ended responses from all three surveys (N = 67) were analyzed using inductive content analysis. Answers to questions regarding the value of sequencing to parents were analyzed and collated. Parents placed high value on diagnostic WES for hearing loss but had different perspectives on the personal utility of additional information. Diagnostic results provided certainty while the choice to learn additional information about childhood-onset disorders was associated with empowerment. WES also represented an opportunity to promote their child's best interests. Results provide insights into the utility of WES for the indication of congenital deafness and for genomic newborn screening broadly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Tutty
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David J Amor
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Service, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anna Jarmolowicz
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kate Paton
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lilian Downie
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Population Genomic Screening for Genetic Etiologies of Neurodevelopmental/Psychiatric Disorders Demonstrates Personal Utility and Positive Participant Responses. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11050365. [PMID: 34062946 PMCID: PMC8147408 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11050365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Genomic variants that cause neurodevelopmental/psychiatric disorders (NPD) are relatively prevalent and highly penetrant. This study aimed to understand adults’ immediate responses to receiving NPD-related results to inform inclusion in population-based genomic screening programs. Nine recurrent, pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) were identified from research exome data, clinically confirmed, and disclosed to adult participants of the Geisinger MyCode Community Health Initiative DiscovEHR cohort by experienced genetic counselors. A subset of in-person genetic counseling sessions (n = 27) were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded using a grounded theory approach. Participant reactions were overwhelmingly positive and indicated that an NPD genetic etiology was highly valuable and personally useful. Participants frequently reported learning disabilities or other NPD that were not documented in their electronic health records and noted difficulties obtaining support for NPD needs. Most intended to share their genetic result with family members and health care providers and were interested in how their result could improve their healthcare. This study indicates that results from population-based NPD genomic screening can provide personal value for adults with NPD, were viewed positively by participants, and could improve clinical outcomes by informing symptom monitoring for NPD and co-morbidities, promoting improved health behaviors, and enhancing psychotherapeutic approaches.
Collapse
|
27
|
Tutty E, Hickerton C, Terrill B, McClaren B, Tytherleigh R, Stackpoole E, Savard J, Newson A, Middleton A, Nisselle A, Cusack M, Adamski M, Gaff C, Metcalfe S. The expectations and realities of nutrigenomic testing in australia: A qualitative study. Health Expect 2021; 24:670-686. [PMID: 33635607 PMCID: PMC8077070 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Revised: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Consumer genomic testing for nutrition and wellness, (nutritional genomics), is becoming increasingly popular. Concurrently, health-care practitioners (HPs) working in private practice (including doctors interested in integrative medicine, private genetic counsellors, pharmacists, dieticians, naturopaths and nutritionists) are involved as test facilitators or interpreters. OBJECTIVE To explore Australian consumers' and HPs' experiences with nutrigenomic testing. METHOD Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted using predominantly purposive sampling. The two data sets were analysed individually, then combined, using a constant comparative, thematic approach. RESULTS Overall, 45 interviews were conducted with consumers (n = 18) and HPs (n = 27). Many of the consumer interviewees experienced chronic ill-health. Nutrigenomic testing was perceived as empowering and a source of hope for answers. While most made changes to their diet/supplements post-test, self-reported health improvements were small. A positive relationship with their HP appeared to minimize disappointment. HPs' adoption and views of nutrigenomic testing varied. Those enthusiastic about testing saw the possibilities it could offer. However, many felt nutrigenomic testing was not the only 'tool' to utilize when offering health care. DISCUSSION This research highlights the important role HPs play in consumers' experiences of nutrigenomics. The varied practice suggests relevant HPs require upskilling in this area to at least support their patients/clients, even if nutrigenomic testing is not part of their practice. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Advisory group included patient/public group representatives who informed study design; focus group participants gave feedback on the survey from which consumer interviewees were sourced. This informed the HP data set design. Interviewees from HP data set assisted with snowball sampling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Tutty
- Murdoch Children’s Research InstituteMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Department of PaediatricsThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Chriselle Hickerton
- Murdoch Children’s Research InstituteMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Australian Genomics Health AllianceVictoriaAustralia
| | - Bronwyn Terrill
- Australian Genomics Health AllianceVictoriaAustralia
- Kinghorn Centre for Clinical GenomicsGarvan Institute of Medical ResearchSydneyNSWAustralia
- St. Vincent’s Clinical SchoolUNSWSydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Belinda McClaren
- Murdoch Children’s Research InstituteMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Department of PaediatricsThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Australian Genomics Health AllianceVictoriaAustralia
| | - Rigan Tytherleigh
- Murdoch Children’s Research InstituteMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Department of PaediatricsThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Elaine Stackpoole
- Murdoch Children’s Research InstituteMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Department of PaediatricsThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Present address:
Genetic Services of Western AustraliaSubiacoWAAustralia
| | - Jaqueline Savard
- Kinghorn Centre for Clinical GenomicsGarvan Institute of Medical ResearchSydneyNSWAustralia
- Sydney Health Ethicsthe University of SydneySydneyNSWAustralia
- Present address:
School of MedicineFaculty of HealthDeakin UniversityGeelongVictoriaAustralia
| | - Ainsley Newson
- Kinghorn Centre for Clinical GenomicsGarvan Institute of Medical ResearchSydneyNSWAustralia
- Sydney Health Ethicsthe University of SydneySydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Anna Middleton
- Society and Ethics ResearchConnecting ScienceWellcome Genome CampusCambridgeUK
- Faculty of EducationUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Amy Nisselle
- Murdoch Children’s Research InstituteMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Department of PaediatricsThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Australian Genomics Health AllianceVictoriaAustralia
| | - Marie Cusack
- Australian Genomics Health AllianceVictoriaAustralia
- Centre for Genetics EducationNSW HealthSydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Melissa Adamski
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and FoodMonash UniversityMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Clara Gaff
- Murdoch Children’s Research InstituteMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Department of PaediatricsThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Australian Genomics Health AllianceVictoriaAustralia
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical ResearchMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Sylvia Metcalfe
- Murdoch Children’s Research InstituteMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Department of PaediatricsThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Australian Genomics Health AllianceVictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hayeems RZ, Luca S, Assamad D, Bhatt A, Ungar WJ. Utility of Genetic Testing from the Perspective of Parents/Caregivers: A Scoping Review. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2021; 8:259. [PMID: 33801725 PMCID: PMC8067127 DOI: 10.3390/children8040259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
In genomics, perceived and personal utility have been proposed as constructs of value that include the subjective meanings and uses of genetic testing. Precisely what constitutes these constructs of utility and how they vary by stakeholder perspective remains unresolved. To advance methods for measuring the value of genetic testing in child health, we conducted a scoping review of the literature to characterize utility from the perspective of parents/caregivers. Peer reviewed literature that included empiric findings from parents/caregivers who received genetic test results for an index child and was written in English from 2016-2020 was included. Identified concepts of utility were coded according to Kohler's construct of personal utility. Of 2142 abstracts screened, 33 met inclusion criteria. Studies reflected a range of genetic test types; the majority of testing was pursued for children with developmental or neurodevelopmental concerns. Coding resulted in 15 elements of utility that mapped to Kohler's four domains of personal utility (affective, cognitive, behavioural and social) and one additional medical management domain. An adapted construct of utility for parents/caregivers may enable specific and standardized strategies for researchers to use to generate evidence of the post-test value of genetic testing. In turn, this will contribute to emerging methods for health technology assessment and policy decision making for genomics in child health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Z. Hayeems
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada; (S.L.); (D.A.); (A.B.); (W.J.U.)
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Stephanie Luca
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada; (S.L.); (D.A.); (A.B.); (W.J.U.)
| | - Daniel Assamad
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada; (S.L.); (D.A.); (A.B.); (W.J.U.)
| | - Ayushi Bhatt
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada; (S.L.); (D.A.); (A.B.); (W.J.U.)
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
| | - Wendy J. Ungar
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada; (S.L.); (D.A.); (A.B.); (W.J.U.)
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
The promise of public health ethics for precision medicine: the case of newborn preventive genomic sequencing. Hum Genet 2021; 141:1035-1043. [PMID: 33715055 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-021-02269-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Precision medicine aims to tailor medical treatment to match individual characteristics and to stratify individuals to concentrate benefits and avoid harm. It has recently been joined by precision public health-the application of precision medicine at population scale to decrease morbidity and optimise population health. Newborn preventive genomic sequencing (NPGS) provides a helpful case study to consider how we should approach ethical questions in precision public health. In this paper, I use NPGS as a case in point to argue that both precision medicine and precision public health need public health ethics. I make this argument in two parts. First, I claim that discussions of ethics in precision medicine and NPGS tend to focus on predominantly individualistic concepts from medical ethics such as autonomy and empowerment. This highlights some deficiencies, including overlooking that choice is subject to constraints and that an individual's place in the world might impact their capacity to 'be responsible'. Second, I make the case for using a public health ethics approach when considering ethics and NPGS, and thus precision public health more broadly. I discuss how precision public health needs to be construed as a collective enterprise and not just as an aggregation of individual interests. I also show how analysing collective values and interests through concepts such as solidarity can enrich ethical discussion of NPGS and highlight previously overlooked issues. With this approach, bioethics can contribute to more just and more appropriate applications of precision medicine and precision public health, including NPGS.
Collapse
|
30
|
Basch CH, Hillyer GC, Wahrman MZ, Garcia P, Basch CE. DNA testing information on YouTube: Inadequate advice can mislead and harm the public. J Genet Couns 2020; 30:785-792. [PMID: 33382174 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Revised: 11/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Direct-to-consumer (DTC) DNA (i.e., genetic) testing has become very popular, with close to 30 million Americans having used these services. The 100 most widely viewed DNA YouTube testing videos were analyzed to determine whether they are providing adequate information for consumers. The top 100 videos had more than 300 million cumulative views, showing the popularity and reach of the information source. While many videos addressed the specimen collection process, family roots and ancestry, and the prospect of uncovering unexpected information about family or health leading to possible distress, almost none of the videos addressed accuracy or confidentiality issues, which are major issues of DNA testing. It is recommended that further information on those issues be made readily available, and more vigilant oversight by regulatory agencies be implemented. Such oversight should include monitoring what information is and is not readily provided by each company, and the veracity of information being communicated to existing and prospective consumers. We also recommend that for medical issues, clinical genetic testing, along with genetic counseling by genetic counselors, be the method of choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corey H Basch
- Department of Public Health, William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ, USA
| | - Grace C Hillyer
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University NY, New York, NY, USA
| | - Miryam Z Wahrman
- Department of Biology, William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ, USA
| | - Philip Garcia
- Department of Public Health, William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ, USA
| | - Charles E Basch
- Health and Behavior Studies, Teachers College, Columbia University NY, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Martin CL, Wain KE, Oetjens MT, Tolwinski K, Palen E, Hare-Harris A, Habegger L, Maxwell EK, Reid JG, Walsh LK, Myers SM, Ledbetter DH. Identification of Neuropsychiatric Copy Number Variants in a Health Care System Population. JAMA Psychiatry 2020; 77:1276-1285. [PMID: 32697297 PMCID: PMC7376464 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.2159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Population screening for medically relevant genomic variants that cause diseases such as hereditary cancer and cardiovascular disorders is increasing to facilitate early disease detection or prevention. Neuropsychiatric disorders (NPDs) are common, complex disorders with clear genetic causes; yet, access to genetic diagnosis is limited. We explored whether inclusion of NPD in population-based genomic screening programs is warranted by assessing 3 key factors: prevalence, penetrance, and personal utility. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the suitability of including pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) associated with NPD in population screening by determining their prevalence and penetrance and exploring the personal utility of disclosing results. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this cohort study, the frequency of 31 NPD CNVs was determined in patient-participants via exome data. Associated clinical phenotypes were assessed using linked electronic health records. Nine CNVs were selected for disclosure by licensed genetic counselors, and participants' psychosocial reactions were evaluated using a mixed-methods approach. A primarily adult population receiving medical care at Geisinger, a large integrated health care system in the United States with the only population-based genomic screening program approved for medically relevant results disclosure, was included. The cohort was identified from the Geisinger MyCode Community Health Initiative. Exome and linked electronic health record data were available for this cohort, which was recruited from February 2007 to April 2017. Data were collected for the qualitative analysis April 2017 through February 2018. Analysis began February 2018 and ended December 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The planned outcomes of this study include (1) prevalence estimate of NPD-associated CNVs in an unselected health care system population; (2) penetrance estimate of NPD diagnoses in CNV-positive individuals; and (3) qualitative themes that describe participants' responses to receiving NPD-associated genomic results. RESULTS Of 90 595 participants with CNV data, a pathogenic CNV was identified in 708 (0.8%; 436 women [61.6%]; mean [SD] age, 50.04 [18.74] years). Seventy percent (n = 494) had at least 1 associated clinical symptom. Of these, 28.8% (204) of CNV-positive individuals had an NPD code in their electronic health record, compared with 13.3% (11 835 of 89 887) of CNV-negative individuals (odds ratio, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.86-2.61; P < .001); 66.4% (470) of CNV-positive individuals had a history of depression and anxiety compared with 54.6% (49 118 of 89 887) of CNV-negative individuals (odds ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.31-1.80; P < .001). 16p13.11 (71 [0.078%]) and 22q11.2 (108 [0.119%]) were the most prevalent deletions and duplications, respectively. Only 5.8% of individuals (41 of 708) had a previously known genetic diagnosis. Results disclosure was completed for 141 individuals. Positive participant responses included poignant reactions to learning a medical reason for lifelong cognitive and psychiatric disabilities. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study informs critical factors central to the development of population-based genomic screening programs and supports the inclusion of NPD in future designs to promote equitable access to clinically useful genomic information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christa Lese Martin
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Karen E. Wain
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew T. Oetjens
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Kasia Tolwinski
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania,Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Emily Palen
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Scott M. Myers
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - David H. Ledbetter
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wilkins CH, Mapes BM, Jerome RN, Villalta-Gil V, Pulley JM, Harris PA. Understanding What Information Is Valued By Research Participants, And Why. Health Aff (Millwood) 2020; 38:399-407. [PMID: 30830824 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
There is growing public demand that research participants receive all of their results, regardless of whether clinical action is indicated. Instead of the standard practice of returning only actionable results, we propose a reconceptualization called "return of value" to encompass the varied ways in which research participants value specific results and more general information they receive beyond actionable results. Our proposal is supported by a national survey of a diverse sample, which found that receiving research results would be valuable to most (78.5 percent) and would make them more likely to trust researchers (70.3 percent). Respondents highly valued results revealing genetic effects on medication response and predicting disease risk, as well as information about nearby clinical trials and updates on how their data were used. The information most valued varied by education, race/ethnicity, and age. Policies are needed to enable return of information in ways that recognize participants' differing informational needs and values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Consuelo H Wilkins
- Consuelo H. Wilkins ( ) is the vice president for health equity, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, and an associate professor in the Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, and the Department of Internal Medicine, Meharry Medical College, all in Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Brandy M Mapes
- Brandy M. Mapes is a senior project manager in the Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| | - Rebecca N Jerome
- Rebecca N. Jerome is a manager of translational research in the Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| | - Victoria Villalta-Gil
- Victoria Villalta-Gil is a senior research specialist in the Meharry Vanderbilt Alliance
| | - Jill M Pulley
- Jill M. Pulley is executive director of the Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| | - Paul A Harris
- Paul A. Harris is director of the Office of Research Informatics in the Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Bíró K, Dombrádi V, Fekete Z, Bányai G, Boruzs K, Nagy A, Ádány R. Investigating the knowledge of and public attitudes towards genetic testing within the Visegrad countries: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:1380. [PMID: 32912246 PMCID: PMC7488256 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09473-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have investigated various factors that can determine the attitudes of the citizens considering genetic testing. However, none of them investigated how these attitudes may differ between the Visegrad countries. METHODS In this cross-sectional study a questionnaire developed by Dutch researchers was translated and used in Hungary, Slovakia, Czechia and Poland. In each country 1000 adult citizens were asked on the topics of personal benefits regarding genetic tests, genetic determinism, and finally, the availability and usage of genetic testing. Multivariate robust regression model was created including several possible influencing factors (such as age, sex, education, marital status, religiousness, and having a genetic test within the nuclear family) to identify the possible differences between the four countries. RESULTS The Hungarian citizens had the most positive opinion on the personal benefits of genetic testing followed by the Czech, Slovak and Polish. All differences were significant in this regard. Considering genetic determinism, the Slovak citizens had a significantly firmer belief in this issue compared to the Hungarians. No other significant differences were observed in this domain. On the topic of the availability and use of genetic testing the Hungarian citizens had the most accepting opinion among the four countries, followed by the Czech citizens. In this domain the Polish and Slovak answers did not differ significantly from each other. CONCLUSIONS Significant differences were observed even when considering various confounding effects. As the underlying reasons for these discrepancies are unknown, future studies should investigate this enigma among the four countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klára Bíró
- Department of Health Systems Management and Quality Management for Health Care, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Viktor Dombrádi
- Department of Health Systems Management and Quality Management for Health Care, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Zita Fekete
- Department of Behavioural Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Gábor Bányai
- Department of Health Systems Management and Quality Management for Health Care, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Klára Boruzs
- Department of Health Systems Management and Quality Management for Health Care, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Attila Nagy
- Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Róza Ádány
- MTA-DE Public Health Research Group, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
- Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
The Impact of Incidental Findings Detected During Brain Imaging on Research Participants of the Rotterdam Study: An Interview Study. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2020; 29:542-556. [PMID: 32892773 PMCID: PMC7525112 DOI: 10.1017/s0963180120000304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
This interview study investigates the short- and long-term implications of incidental findings detected through brain imaging on research participants’ lives and their surroundings. For this study, nine participants of the Rotterdam Scan Study with an incidental finding were approached and interviewed. When examining research participants’ narratives on the impact of the disclosure of incidental findings, the authors identified five sets of tensions with regard to motivations for and expectations of research participation, preferences regarding disclosure, short- and long-term impacts and impacts on self and others. The paper shows: (1) that the impact of incidental findings may be greater than participants at first let on; (2) incidental findings can have significant effects on participants’ social environment; and (3) participants may not feel prepared for disclosure even if incidental findings have been discussed during the informed consent process. The authors call for investigators to be aware of research participants’ experiences and these short- and long-term impacts when designing suitable courses of action for the detection and management of incidental findings in research settings.
Collapse
|
35
|
Ibuki T, Yamamoto K, Matsui K. Differences in Conceptual Understanding of the "Actionability" of Incidental Findings and the Resultant Difference in Ethical Responsibility: An Empirical Study in Japan. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2020; 11:187-194. [PMID: 32615058 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1784308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The issue of incidental findings encountered in medical researches and in clinical practices becomes controversial in recent years. In what situations should researchers and clinicians disclose incidental findings to study participants or patients? According to previous studies, the concept of "actionability" is one of most important notions in determining the management of incidental findings, however, the understanding of this concept is also inconsistent among people and the inconsistency can affect the management of incidental findings. That is why we surveyed the difference in conceptual understanding of "actionability" for incidental findings with genomic researches in Japan. Methods: We conducted focus groups with individuals conducting genomics research or genetic testing at the National Centers in Japan, all of which are expected to contribute significantly to genomics research and subsequent clinical practice in Japan. Results: As far as our survey and analysis, there exists crucial discrepancy; one might consider that an "actionable" finding should be one that would be useful in treatment or prevention; another might consider if the finding could lead to a definitive diagnosis, it should be considered "actionable," regardless of the treatment potential of the disease; moreover another might considered that a finding that would lead to the opportunity to participate in a clinical trial was "actionable". Conclusion: Based on the present study which we conducted, we have examined thus far the concept of "actionability", which may influence the management of incidental findings. The present study revealed discrepancies in the understanding of this concept among the National Centers in Japan, which all bear similar expectations from society. And this difference in "actionability" would lead to variations in management of incidental findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomohide Ibuki
- Faculty of Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Science, Noda-shi, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Yamamoto
- Department of Bioethics, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenji Matsui
- Division of Bioethics and Division of Bioethics and Healthcare Law, National Cancer Center Japan, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Walker RW, Belbin GM, Sorokin EP, Van Vleck T, Wojcik GL, Moscati A, Gignoux CR, Cho J, Abul-Husn NS, Nadkarni G, Kenny EE, Loos RJ. A common variant in PNPLA3 is associated with age at diagnosis of NAFLD in patients from a multi-ethnic biobank. J Hepatol 2020; 72:1070-1081. [PMID: 32145261 PMCID: PMC7840172 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.01.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2019] [Revised: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The Ile138Met variant (rs738409) in the PNPLA3 gene has the largest effect on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), increasing the risk of progression to severe forms of liver disease. It remains unknown if the variant plays a role in age of NAFLD onset. We aimed to determine if rs738409 impacts on the age of NAFLD diagnosis. METHODS We applied a novel natural language processing (NLP) algorithm to a longitudinal electronic health records (EHR) dataset of >27,000 individuals with genetic data from a multi-ethnic biobank, defining NAFLD cases (n = 1,703) and confirming controls (n = 8,119). We conducted i) a survival analysis to determine if age at diagnosis differed by rs738409 genotype, ii) a receiver operating characteristics analysis to assess the utility of the rs738409 genotype in discriminating NAFLD cases from controls, and iii) a phenome-wide association study (PheWAS) between rs738409 and 10,095 EHR-derived disease diagnoses. RESULTS The PNPLA3 G risk allele was associated with: i) earlier age of NAFLD diagnosis, with the strongest effect in Hispanics (hazard ratio 1.33; 95% CI 1.15-1.53; p <0.0001) among whom a NAFLD diagnosis was 15% more likely in risk allele carriers vs. non-carriers; ii) increased NAFLD risk (odds ratio 1.61; 95% CI 1.349-1.73; p <0.0001), with the strongest effect among Hispanics (odds ratio 1.43; 95% CI 1.28-1.59; p <0.0001); iii) additional liver diseases in a PheWAS (p <4.95 × 10-6) where the risk variant also associated with earlier age of diagnosis. CONCLUSION Given the role of the rs738409 in NAFLD diagnosis age, our results suggest that stratifying risk within populations known to have an enhanced risk of liver disease, such as Hispanic carriers of the rs738409 variant, would be effective in earlier identification of those who would benefit most from early NAFLD prevention and treatment strategies. LAY SUMMARY Despite clear associations between the PNPLA3 rs738409 variant and elevated risk of progression from non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to more severe forms of liver disease, it remains unknown if PNPLA3 rs738409 plays a role in the age of NAFLD onset. Herein, we found that this risk variant is associated with an earlier age of NAFLD and other liver disease diagnoses; an observation most pronounced in Hispanic Americans. We conclude that PNPLA3 rs738409 could be used to better understand liver disease risk within vulnerable populations and identify patients that may benefit from early prevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan W. Walker
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029,Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029,Corresponding author. Address: Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029. (R.W. Walker)
| | - Gillian M. Belbin
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029,Center for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029
| | - Elena P. Sorokin
- Department of Genetics, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Tielman Van Vleck
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029
| | - Genevieve L. Wojcik
- Department of Genetics, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Arden Moscati
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029,Center for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029
| | - Christopher R. Gignoux
- Center for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029,Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA,Department of Biostatistics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Judy Cho
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029,Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029,Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029,Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029
| | - Noura S. Abul-Husn
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029,Center for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029,Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029,Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029
| | - Girish Nadkarni
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029
| | - Eimear E. Kenny
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029,Center for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029,Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029,Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029
| | - Ruth J.F. Loos
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029,Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029,The Mindich Child Health Development Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Rashkin MD, Bowes J, Dunaway K, Dhaliwal J, Loomis E, Riffle S, Washington NL, Ziegler C, Lu J, Levin E. Genetic counseling, 2030: An on-demand service tailored to the needs of a price conscious, genetically literate, and busy world. J Genet Couns 2020; 28:456-465. [PMID: 30964579 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2018] [Revised: 03/06/2019] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The practice of genetic counseling is going to be impacted by the public's expectation that goods, services, information, and experiences happen on demand, wherever and whenever people want them. Building from trends that are currently taking shape, this article looks just over a decade into the future-to 2030-to provide a description of how the field of genetics and genetic counseling will be changed, as well as advice for genetic counselors for how to prepare. We build from the prediction that a large portion of the general public will have access to their digitized whole genome sequence anytime, any place, on any device. We focus on five topics downstream of this prediction: public health, personal autonomy, polygenic scores (PGS), evolving clinical practices, and genetic privacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - James Lu
- Helix Opco, LLC, San Carlos, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Wöhlke S, Schaper M, Oliveri S, Cutica I, Spinella F, Pravettoni G, Steinberger D, Schicktanz S. German and Italian Users of Web-Accessed Genetic Data: Attitudes on Personal Utility and Personal Sharing Preferences. Results of a Comparative Survey (n=192). Front Genet 2020; 11:102. [PMID: 32265977 PMCID: PMC7099127 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic information is increasingly provided outside of the traditional clinical setting, allowing users to access it directly via specialized online platforms. This development is possibly resulting in changing ethical and social challenges for users of predictive genetic tests. Little is known about the attitudes and experiences of users of web-accessed genetic information. This survey analyzes data from two European countries with regard to the utility of genetic information, the users' ways of making use of and dealing with information, and their sharing behavior. Particular focus is given to ethical and social questions regarding the motivation to share personal genetic results with others. Social factors tested for are national background, gender, and marital, parental, and educational status. This study will contribute to public discourse and offer ethical recommendations. The study will also serve to validate the developed questionnaire for use in population representative surveys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Wöhlke
- Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Manuel Schaper
- Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Serena Oliveri
- Department of Oncology and Hematology Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Ilaria Cutica
- Department of Oncology and Hematology Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Department of Oncology and Hematology Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Silke Schicktanz
- Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
What Results Should Be Returned from Opportunistic Screening in Translational Research? J Pers Med 2020; 10:jpm10010013. [PMID: 32121581 PMCID: PMC7151595 DOI: 10.3390/jpm10010013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 02/16/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Increasingly, patients without clinical indications are undergoing genomic tests. The purpose of this study was to assess their appreciation and comprehension of their test results and their clinicians' reactions. We conducted 675 surveys with participants from the Vanderbilt Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) cohort. We interviewed 36 participants: 19 had received positive results, and 17 were self-identified racial minorities. Eleven clinicians who had patients who had participated in eMERGE were interviewed. A further 21 of these clinicians completed surveys. Participants spontaneously admitted to understanding little or none of the information returned to them from the eMERGE study. However, they simultaneously said that they generally found testing to be "helpful," even when it did not inform their health care. Primary care physicians expressed discomfort in being asked to interpret the results for their patients and described it as an undue burden. Providing genetic testing to otherwise healthy patients raises a number of ethical issues that warrant serious consideration. Although our participants were enthusiastic about enrolling and receiving their results, they express a limited understanding of what the results mean for their health care. This fact, coupled the clinicians' concern, urges greater caution when educating and enrolling participants in clinically non-indicated testing.
Collapse
|
40
|
Clinical application of genomic high-throughput data: Infrastructural, ethical, legal and psychosocial aspects. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2020; 31:1-15. [PMID: 31866110 DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2017] [Revised: 11/03/2018] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Genomic high-throughput technologies (GHTT) such as next-generation sequencing represent a fast and cost-effective tool toward a more comprehensive understanding of the molecular background of complex diseases. However, technological advances contrast with insufficient application in clinical practice. Thus, patients, physicians, and other professionals are faced with tough challenges that forestall the efficient and effective implementation. With the increasing application of genetic testing, it is of paramount importance that physicians and other professionals in healthcare recognize the restrictions and potential of GHTT, in order to understand and interpret the complex data in the context of health and disease. At the same time, the growing volume and complexity of data is forever increasing the need for sustainable infrastructure and state-of-the-art tools for efficient data management, including their analysis and integration. The large pool of sensitive information remains difficult to interpret and fundamental questions spanning from billing to legal, social, and ethical issues have still not been resolved. Here we summarize and discuss these obstacles in an interdisciplinary context and suggest ways to overcome them. Continuous discussion with clinicians, data managers, biostatisticians, systems medicine experts, ethicists, legal scholars, and patients illuminates the strengths, weakness, and current practices in the pipeline from biomaterial to sequencing and data management. This discussion also highlights the new, cross-disciplinary working collaborations to realize the wide-ranging challenges in clinical genomics including the exceptional demands placed on the staff preparing and presenting the data, as well as the question as to how to report the data and results to patients.
Collapse
|
41
|
Savard J, Hickerton C, Metcalfe SA, Gaff C, Middleton A, Newson AJ. From Expectations to Experiences: Consumer Autonomy and Choice in Personal Genomic Testing. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2020; 11:63-76. [PMID: 31885332 PMCID: PMC7048070 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2019.1701583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Background: Personal genomic testing (PGT) offers individuals genetic information about relationships, wellness, sporting ability, and health. PGT is increasingly accessible online, including in emerging markets such as Australia. Little is known about what consumers expect from these tests and whether their reflections on testing resonate with bioethics concepts such as autonomy.Methods: We report findings from focus groups and semi-structured interviews that explored attitudes to and experiences of PGT. Focus group participants had little experience with PGT, while interview participants had undergone testing. Recordings were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings were critically interpreted with reference to bioethics scholarship on autonomy.Results: Fifty-six members of the public participated in seven focus groups, and 40 individuals were interviewed separately. Both groups valued the choice of PGT, and believed that it could motivate relevant actions. Focus group themes centered on the perceived value of choices, knowledge enabling action and knowledge about the self. Interview themes suggest that participants reflexively engage with their PGT information to make meaning, and that some appreciate its shortcomings. Critical interpretation of findings shows that while consumers of PGT are able to exercise a degree of autonomy in choosing, they may not be able to achieve a substantive conceptualization of autonomy, one that promotes alignment with higher-order desires.Conclusions: PGT consumers can critically reason about testing. However, they may uncritically accept test results, may not appreciate drawbacks of increased choice, or may overestimate the potential for information to motivate behavioral change. While consumers appear to be capable of substantive autonomy, they do so without ongoing support from companies. PGT companies promote a problematic ("default") account of autonomy, reliant on empowerment rhetoric. This leaves consumers vulnerable to making decisions inconsistent with their higher-order desires. As PGT expands, claims about its power and value need to be carefully drawn.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Savard
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia
| | - Chriselle Hickerton
- Genetics Education and Health Research, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sylvia A. Metcalfe
- Genetics Education and Health Research, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Clara Gaff
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anna Middleton
- Society and Ethics Research, Wellcome Genome Campus Society and Ethics Research Group, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ainsley J. Newson
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Farrell RM, Agatisa PK, Michie MM, Greene A, Ford PJ. The personal utility of cfDNA screening: Pregnant patients' experiences with cfDNA screening and views on expanded cfDNA panels. J Genet Couns 2019; 29:88-96. [PMID: 31680382 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Revised: 10/07/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Prenatal cell-free DNA screening (cfDNA) provides more genetic risk information about the fetus than has ever been possible. At the same time, the rapid expansion of new cfDNA panels raises important questions about how to structure patient-centered discussions that best support patients' decision-making about its use. To address this question, we conducted interviews with pregnant patients to identify decision-making needs and preferences with respect to cfDNA in patient-centered healthcare discussions, given its evolving capability to identify a range of fetal variants. Personal utility was a core concept guiding decision-making. Participants spoke of how their deeply personal values and beliefs about maternal responsibility, actionability, and tolerance of uncertainty framed their view of the personal utility of cfDNA screening. While discussing their notions of personal utility with their healthcare provider, participants also had concerns about potential ramifications for the provider-patient relationship and shared decision-making when disclosing values and preferences regarding disability, quality of life, and termination-particularly as it becomes possible to identify variants with different disease-associated severity and outcomes. The complexities associated with the introduction of genomics in prenatal care present unique challenges to structuring effective shared decision-making discussions between patients and their healthcare providers. While efforts are underway to determine how to best educate patients about the medical aspects of cfDNA, it is equally important to develop approaches in healthcare communication that enable patients to make informed, values-based decisions about the use of cfDNA and its impact on their pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth M Farrell
- OB/GYN and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Center for Bioethics, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Marsha M Michie
- Department of Bioethics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Amy Greene
- Center for Spiritual Care, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Paul J Ford
- Center for Bioethics, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Saelaert M, Mertes H, Moerenhout T, De Baere E, Devisch I. Criteria for reporting incidental findings in clinical exome sequencing - a focus group study on professional practices and perspectives in Belgian genetic centres. BMC Med Genomics 2019; 12:123. [PMID: 31429751 PMCID: PMC6702726 DOI: 10.1186/s12920-019-0561-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2019] [Accepted: 07/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Incidental and secondary findings (IFs and SFs) are subject to ongoing discussion as potential consequences of clinical exome sequencing (ES). International policy documents vary on the reporting of these findings. Discussion points include the practice of unintentionally identified IFs versus deliberately pursued SFs, patient opt-out possibilities and the spectrum of reportable findings. The heterogeneity of advice permits a non-standardised disclosure but research is lacking on actual reporting practices. Therefore, this study assessed national reporting practices for IFs and SFs in clinical ES and the underlying professional perspectives. Methods A qualitative focus group study has been undertaken, including professionals from Belgian centres for medical genetics (CMGs). Data were analysed thematically. Results All Belgian CMGs participated in this study. Data analysis resulted in six main themes, including one regarding the reporting criteria used for IFs. All CMGs currently use ES-based panel testing. They have limited experience with IFs in clinical ES and are cautious about the pursuit of SFs. Two main reporting criteria for IFs were referred to by all CMGs: the clinical significance of the IF (including pathogenicity and medical actionability) and patient-related factors (including the patient’s preference to know and patient characteristics). The consensus over the importance of these criteria contrasted with their challenging interpretation and application. Points of concern included IFs’ pathogenicity in non-symptomatic persons, IFs concerning variants of uncertain significance, the requirement and definition of medical actionability and patient opt-out possibilities. Finally, reporting decisions were guided by the interaction between the clinical significance of the IF and patient characteristics. This interaction questions the possible disclosure of findings with context-dependent and personal utility, such as IFs concerning a carrier status. To evaluate the IF’s final relevance, a professional and case-by-case deliberation was considered essential. Conclusions The challenging application of reporting criteria for IFs results in diversified practices and policy perspectives within Belgian CMGs. This echoes international concerns and may have consequences for effective policy recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlies Saelaert
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Philosophy of Medicine and Ethics Research Group, Ghent University, Campus Heymans (UZ Gent), Corneel Heymanslaan 10 - Building 6K3, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Heidi Mertes
- Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tania Moerenhout
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Philosophy of Medicine and Ethics Research Group, Ghent University, Campus Heymans (UZ Gent), Corneel Heymanslaan 10 - Building 6K3, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Elfride De Baere
- Center for Medical Genetics Ghent (CMGG), Ghent University and Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ignaas Devisch
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Philosophy of Medicine and Ethics Research Group, Ghent University, Campus Heymans (UZ Gent), Corneel Heymanslaan 10 - Building 6K3, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Pitini E, D’Andrea E, De Vito C, Rosso A, Unim B, Marzuillo C, Federici A, Di Maria E, Villari P. A proposal of a new evaluation framework towards implementation of genetic tests. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0219755. [PMID: 31381569 PMCID: PMC6681956 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2018] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The existing frameworks for the evaluation of genetic and genomic applications clearly address the technical and clinical value of a test, but are less concerned with the way genetic services are delivered and organized. We therefore aimed to develop a comprehensive new framework that includes an assessment of service delivery. Methods A new framework was built on the evaluation dimensions identified through a systematic review of the existing frameworks and a Delphi survey of Italian experts in public health genomics. Results Our framework has four sections. The first two sections, respectively, guide the evidence collection process for the genetic test (analytic validity; clinical validity; clinical utility; personal utility) and its delivery models (organizational aspects; economic evaluation; ethical, legal and social implications; patient perspective). The third section guides the formulation of the research priorities to be addressed in future research. Finally, the fourth section suggests three criteria to summarize the collected evidence (net benefit, cost-effectiveness, feasibility). Conclusion We have successfully developed an evaluation framework for the evaluation of genetic tests that includes an assessment of service delivery. It also introduces some neglected evaluation dimensions such as personal utility and patient perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica Pitini
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- * E-mail:
| | - Elvira D’Andrea
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United Sates of America
| | - Corrado De Vito
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Annalisa Rosso
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Brigid Unim
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Carolina Marzuillo
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Emilio Di Maria
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genova, Division of Medical Genetics, Galliera Hospital, Genova, Italy
| | - Paolo Villari
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Zebrowski AM, Ellis DE, Barg FK, Sperber NR, Bernhardt BA, Denny JC, Dexter PR, Ginsburg GS, Horowitz CR, Johnson JA, Levy MA, Orlando LA, Pollin TI, Skaar TC, Kimmel SE. Qualitative study of system-level factors related to genomic implementation. Genet Med 2019; 21:1534-1540. [PMID: 30467402 PMCID: PMC6533158 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0378-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2018] [Accepted: 11/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Research on genomic medicine integration has focused on applications at the individual level, with less attention paid to implementation within clinical settings. Therefore, we conducted a qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to identify system-level factors that played a role in implementation of genomic medicine within Implementing GeNomics In PracTicE (IGNITE) Network projects. METHODS Up to four study personnel, including principal investigators and study coordinators from each of six IGNITE projects, were interviewed using a semistructured interview guide that asked interviewees to describe study site(s), progress at each site, and factors facilitating or impeding project implementation. Interviews were coded following CFIR inner-setting constructs. RESULTS Key barriers included (1) limitations in integrating genomic data and clinical decision support tools into electronic health records, (2) physician reluctance toward genomic research participation and clinical implementation due to a limited evidence base, (3) inadequate reimbursement for genomic medicine, (4) communication among and between investigators and clinicians, and (5) lack of clinical and leadership engagement. CONCLUSION Implementation of genomic medicine is hindered by several system-level barriers to both research and practice. Addressing these barriers may serve as important facilitators for studying and implementing genomics in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis M Zebrowski
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Darcy E Ellis
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Frances K Barg
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nina R Sperber
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Barbara A Bernhardt
- Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joshua C Denny
- Departments of Biomedical Informatics and Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Paul R Dexter
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Geoffrey S Ginsburg
- Duke Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Carol R Horowitz
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Julie A Johnson
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research and Center for Pharmacogenomics, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Mia A Levy
- Departments of Biomedical Informatics and Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Lori A Orlando
- Duke Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Toni I Pollin
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Todd C Skaar
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Stephen E Kimmel
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Pearlman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Schaper M, Wöhlke S, Schicktanz S. "I would rather have it done by a doctor"-laypeople's perceptions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC GT) and its ethical implications. MEDICINE, HEALTH CARE, AND PHILOSOPHY 2019; 22:31-40. [PMID: 29705970 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-018-9837-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC GT) has been available for several years now, with varying degrees of regulation across different countries. Despite a restrictive legal framework it is possible for consumers to order genetic tests from companies located in other countries. However, German laypeople's awareness and perceptions of DTC GT services is still unexplored. We conducted seven focus groups (participants n = 43) with German laypeople to explore their perceptions of and attitudes towards commercial genetic testing and its ethical implications. Participants were critical towards DTC GT. Criticism was directed at health-related, predictive testing, while lifestyle tests were accepted and even welcomed to some extent. Participants expressed strong reservations regarding commercial provision of genetic diagnostics and expressed a lack of trust in respective companies. They preferred non-commercial distribution within the public healthcare system. Participants also expressed high expectations of physicians' abilities to interpret information obtained via DTC GT companies and provide counseling. Legal restrictions on commercial distribution of genetic tests were opposed, with participants arguing that it should be available to consumers. DTC GT companies are not perceived as trustworthy when compared to the public healthcare system and its professional ethical standards and practices. Laypeople rated general consumer autonomy higher than their own concerns, thus recommending against strong legal regulation. We conclude that medicine's trustworthiness may be negatively affected if commercial provision is not visibly opposed by the medical professions, while DTC GT companies may gain in trustworthiness if they adapt to standards and practices upheld in medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Schaper
- Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 36, 37073, Göttingen, Germany.
| | - Sabine Wöhlke
- Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 36, 37073, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Silke Schicktanz
- Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 36, 37073, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Friedman JM, Bombard Y, Cornel MC, Fernandez CV, Junker AK, Plon SE, Stark Z, Knoppers BM. Genome-wide sequencing in acutely ill infants: genomic medicine's critical application? Genet Med 2019; 21:498-504. [PMID: 29895853 PMCID: PMC6752673 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0055-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2018] [Accepted: 04/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Diagnostic genome-wide sequencing (exome or genome sequencing and data analysis for high-penetrance disease-causing variants) in acutely ill infants appears to be clinically useful, but the value of this diagnostic test should be rigorously demonstrated before it is accepted as a standard of care. This white paper was developed by the Paediatric Task Team of the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health's Regulatory and Ethics Work Stream to address the question of how we can determine the clinical value of genome-wide sequencing in infants in an intensive care setting. After reviewing available clinical and ethics literature on this question, we conclude that evaluating diagnostic genome-wide sequencing as a comprehensive scan for major genetic disease (rather than as a large panel of single-gene tests) provides a practical approach to assessing its clinical value in acutely ill infants. Comparing the clinical value of diagnostic genome-wide sequencing to chromosomal microarray analysis, the current evidence-based standard of care, per case of serious genetic disease diagnosed provides a practical means of assessing clinical value. Scientifically rigorous studies of this kind are needed to determine if clinical genome-wide sequencing should be established as a standard of care supported by healthcare systems and insurers for diagnosis of genetic disease in seriously ill newborn infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan M Friedman
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Martina C Cornel
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Anne K Junker
- Department of Pediatrics, British Columbia Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sharon E Plon
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics and Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
- Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Zornitza Stark
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Australia
| | - Bartha Maria Knoppers
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Evaluation for Genetic Disorders in the Absence of a Clinical Indication for Testing. J Mol Diagn 2019; 21:3-12. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2018.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Revised: 08/29/2018] [Accepted: 09/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
|
49
|
Pereira S, Robinson JO, Gutierrez AM, Petersen DK, Hsu RL, Lee CH, Schwartz TS, Holm IA, Beggs AH, Green RC, McGuire AL. Perceived Benefits, Risks, and Utility of Newborn Genomic Sequencing in the BabySeq Project. Pediatrics 2019; 143:S6-S13. [PMID: 30600265 PMCID: PMC6480393 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-1099c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES There is interest in applying genomic sequencing (GS) to newborns' clinical care. Here we explore parents' and clinicians' attitudes toward and perceptions of the risks, benefits, and utility of newborn GS compared with newborn screening (NBS) prior to receiving study results. METHODS The BabySeq Project is a randomized controlled trial used to explore the impact of integrating GS into the clinical care of newborns. Parents (n = 493) of enrolled infants (n = 309) and clinicians (n = 144) completed a baseline survey at enrollment. We examined between-group differences in perceived utility and attitudes toward NBS and GS. Open-ended responses about risks and benefits of each technology were categorized by theme. RESULTS The majority of parents (71%) and clinicians (51%) agreed that there are health benefits of GS, although parents and clinicians agreed more that there are risks associated with GS (35%, 70%) than with NBS (19%, 39%; all P < .05). Parents perceived more benefit and less risk of GS than did clinicians. Clinicians endorsed concerns about privacy and discrimination related to genomic information more strongly than did parents, and parents anticipated benefits of GS that clinicians did not. CONCLUSIONS Parents and clinicians are less confident in GS than NBS, but parents perceive a more favorable risk/benefit ratio of GS than do clinicians. Clinicians should be aware that parents' optimism may stem from their perceived benefits beyond clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey Pereira
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Jill Oliver Robinson
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Amanda M Gutierrez
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Devan K Petersen
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Rebecca L Hsu
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Caroline H Lee
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Talia S Schwartz
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ingrid A Holm
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alan H Beggs
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert C Green
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Partners Healthcare Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, Massachusetts; and
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Amy L McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas;
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Bunnik EM, Richard E, Milne R, Schermer MHN. On the personal utility of Alzheimer's disease-related biomarker testing in the research context. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2018; 44:830-834. [PMID: 30154216 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2018-104772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2018] [Revised: 06/18/2018] [Accepted: 08/04/2018] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
Many healthy volunteers choose to take part in Alzheimer's disease (AD) prevention studies because they want to know whether they will develop dementia-and what they can do to reduce their risk-and are therefore interested in learning the results of AD biomarker tests. Proponents of AD biomarker disclosure often refer to the personal utility of AD biomarkers, claiming that research participants will be able to use AD biomarker information for personal purposes, such as planning ahead or making important life decisions. In this paper, the claim that AD biomarkers have personal utility for asymptomatic individuals is critically assessed. It demonstrates that in the absence of clinical validity, AD biomarkers cannot have personal utility and do not serve research participants' autonomy. Over the next few years, many research groups will be confronted with participants' preferences to learn the results of AD biomarker tests. When researchers choose to make results available upon explicit request, they should ensure adequate information provision and education, notably on the uncertain clinical significance of AD biomarker information. Routine disclosure of AD biomarkers to cognitively unimpaired individuals in research settings cannot be justified with an appeal to the personal utility of AD biomarker information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline M Bunnik
- Department of Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Edo Richard
- Department of Neurology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Milne
- Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Maartje H N Schermer
- Department of Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|