First pass effect in patients with large vessel occlusion strokes undergoing neurothrombectomy: insights from the Trevo Retriever Registry

Effect of Intravenous Tirofiban Versus Placebo on First-Pass Successful Reperfusion in Endovascular Stroke Thrombectomy: Insights From the RESCUE BT Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

First-pass successful reperfusion (FPSR), defined as a successful/complete reperfusion achieved after a single thrombectomy pass, is predictive of favorable outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke with large-vessel occlusion. It is unknown whether intravenous tirofiban is effective in increasing the rate of FPSR in acute anterior large-vessel occlusion stroke.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients who had acute large-vessel occlusion stroke presenting within 24 hours and underwent endovascular thrombectomy were analyzed from the RESCUE BT (Intravenous Tirofiban for Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke) clinical trial, of which the main analysis was neutral. The RESCUE BT trial randomized patients to receive either intravenous tirofiban or placebo before endovascular thrombectomy. The primary end point was FPSR, defined as successful reperfusion (extended thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scale 2b50, 2c, or 3) at first thrombectomy attempt. A modified Poisson regression analysis assessed the association between intravenous tirofiban treatment and FPSR. Of 948 enrolled patients, 463 patients were randomized to the tirofiban group and 485 to the placebo group. The mean age was 67 years, and 41.0% of the patients were women. FPSR was achieved more often in the tirofiban group (30.5% versus 23.5%; adjusted risk ratio, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.01-1.51]; P=0.04). FPSR was associated with a favorable shift to lower modified Rankin Scale disability levels at 90 days (common odds ratio, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.08-1.86]; P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In this post hoc analysis of the RESCUE BT trial, treatment with intravenous tirofiban before endovascular thrombectomy was associated with increased FPSR in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation. FPSR was associated with reduced 90-day levels of disability.

REGISTRATION

URL: http://chictr.org; Unique Identifier: ChiCTR-INR-17014167.

Impact of first pass effect in endovascular treatment of large core stroke: a post-hoc analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT trial

BACKGROUND

The first-pass effect (FPE) is linked to better safety and efficacy prognosis in patients with small- to- moderate sized ischemic infarctions. We evaluated the incidence, prognosis, and predictors of FPE in patients with large core infarctions (LCIs).

METHODS

We conducted a post-hoc analysis of data from the Trial of Endovascular Therapy in Acute Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusive Patients with a Large Infarct Core (ANGEL-ASPECT). The FPE was defined as a successful recanalization (expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) 2 c/3, and eTICI 2b-3 as modified FPE (mFPE)) after one pass. The primary outcome was clinical functional independence, and the secondary outcomes were independent ambulation, assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) defined by the Heidelberg bleeding classification, any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and death within 90 days of stroke onset.

RESULTS

Of the 226 patients in the study, FPE and mFPE were achieved in 33 (14.6%) and 82 (36.3%) patients, respectively. Patients with FPE exhibited shorter onset-to-puncture times (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.915; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84 to 0.996), and patients with mFPE were older (OR 1.039; 95% CI: 1.005 to 1.075). mFPE was significantly associated with favorable outcomes (modified Rankin score [mRS] 0-2: OR 2.64; 95% CI: 1.37 to 5.07; mRS 0-3: OR 3.31; 95% CI: 1.73 to 6.33). FPE tended to improve outcomes (mRS 0-3: OR 2.24; 95% CI: 0.92 to 4.97; p=0.08). ICH rates (OR 0.60; 95% CI: 0.34 to 1.05; p=0.07) and 90-day deaths (OR 0.57; 95% CI: 0.30 to 1.09; p=0.09) tended to decrease in patients who achieved mFPE but not in patients who achieved FPE.

CONCLUSIONS

In the ANGEL-ASPECT trial, patients who achieved mFPE had a higher rate of independent ambulation and functional independence, and the rates of any ICH and 90-day death tended to decrease.

First pass effect in patients undergoing endovascular treatment for posterior circulation acute ischemic stroke

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the impact of first pass effect (FPE) on outcomes in the posterior circulation acute ischemic stroke (PC-AIS) and the independent predictors of FPE.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, retrospective study. PC-AIS patients who underwent endovascular treatment were reviewed. The cohort achieving complete or nearly complete reperfusion (defined as expanded treatment in cerebralischemia [eTICI] ≥ 2c) was categorized into the FPE and multiple pass effect (MPE) groups. FPE was defined as achieving eTICI ≥ 2c with a single pass and without the use of rescue therapy. Modified FPE (mFPE) was defined as meeting the criteria for FPE but with eTICI ≥ 2b. The association of FPE with 90-day clinical outcomes and predictors for FPE were both investigated.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 328 patients, with 69 patients (21 %) in the FPE group. For primary outcome, FPE had a significant higher favorable outcome (mRS ≤ 3) rate than MPE (65.2 % vs. 44.8 %, p = 0.003). Similar outcomes were observed in the mFPE. Furthermore, FPE was significantly associated with favorable outcome (adjusted OR 2.23, 95 % CI 1.06-4.73, p = 0.036). Positive predictors for FPE included occlusion in the distal basilar artery, the first-line aspiration or combination, and cardioembolic etiology. Negative predictors for FPE included hypertension and general anesthesia.

CONCLUSION

For PC-AIS patients due to large or medium vessel occlusion, FPE is associated with favorable clinical outcomes. The first-line techniques of aspiration or combination, as well as avoiding general anesthesia, contribute to a better realization of FPE.

Mechanical thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion strokes beyond 24 hours

BACKGROUND

Recent clinical trials have shown that mechanical thrombectomy is superior to medical management for large vessel occlusion for up to 24 hours from onset. Our objective is to examine the safety and efficacy of thrombectomy beyond the standard of care window.

METHODS

A retrospective review was undertaken of the multicenter Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR). We identified patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion beyond 24 hours. We selected a matched control group from patients who underwent thrombectomy in the 6-24-hour window. We used functional independence at 3 months as our primary outcome measure.

RESULTS

We identified 121 patients who underwent thrombectomy beyond 24 hours and 1824 in the 6-24-hour window. We selected a 2:1 matched group of patients with thrombectomy 6-24 hours as a comparison group. Patients undergoing thrombectomy beyond 24 hours were less likely to be independent at 90 days (18 (18.8%) vs 73 (34.9%), P=0.005). They had higher odds of mortality at 90 days in the adjusted analysis (OR 2.34, P=0.023). Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and other complications were similar in the two groups. In a multivariate analysis only lower number of attempts was associated with good outcomes (OR 0.27, P=0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Mechanical thrombectomy beyond 24 hours appears to be safe and tolerable with no more hemorrhages or complications compared with standard of care thrombectomy. Outcomes and mortality in this time window are worse compared with an earlier time window, but the rates of good outcomes may justify this therapy in selected patients.

Clinical Benefit of First-Pass Recanalization Is Time-Dependent in Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke

Clinical benefit can be time-dependent even after first-pass recanalization (FPR) in endovascular treatment of acute stroke. This study aimed to evaluate the association between favorable outcome and FPR under a specific time frame. Patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Recanalization status was categorized into four groups based on FPR and dichotomized time from groin puncture to recanalization (P-to-R time). Favorable outcomes were compared between groups. A total of 458 patients were included. As the cutoff of P-to-R time for favorable outcome was 30 min, recanalization status was categorized into FPR (+) with a P-to-R time ≤ 30 min (Group 1), FPR (-) with a P-to-R time ≤ 30 min (Group 2), FPR (+) with a P-to-R time > 30 min (Group 3), and FPR (-) with a P-to-R time > 30 min (Group 4). Favorable outcomes in Group 3 (37.5%) were significantly less frequent than those in Group 1 (60.4%, p = 0.029) and Group 2 (59.5%, p = 0.033) but were not significantly different from those in Group 4 (35.7%, p = 0.903). Compared to Group 1, Group 3 (adjusted odds ratio, 0.30 [95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.76]; p = 0.011) and Group 4 (0.25 [0.14-0.48]; p < 0.001) were adversely associated with favorable outcomes. FPR was associated with functional outcome in a time-dependent manner. Even for patients who have achieved FPR, their functional outcome might not be favorable if the P-to-R time is >30 min.

The Stream Device-A Retrospective Review of 51 Cases

Mechanical thrombectomy is the gold-standard treatment for patients that have suffered large-vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. Various different stent-retrievers, aspiration catheters, and techniques have been developed to perform this procedure. We present our initial results regarding the Stream device.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database at our high-volume centre to identify all patients treated with the Stream device between February 2021 and January 2023. We recorded baseline demographics, NIHSS, ASPECT scores, eTICI scores, complications, and 90-day mRS.

RESULTS

We identified 51 patients, 49.0% of whom were male (n = 25), with a median age of 73 (range: 51-89) and a median NIHSS score of 17 (range 4-22), and 68.6% received IV tPA. The median ASPECT score was 10 (range 6-10). Hyperdense clots were seen in 34 cases (66.7%), with a mean clot length of 12 ± 6.2 mm (range 2-26 mm). Clots were located in the anterior circulation in 49 patients. The standard Stream device was used in 78.4% of cases, with Stream 17 being used in 19.6% of cases. The FPE was observed in 25.5% of cases (n = 13), with the mFPE being seen in 31.4% of cases (n = 16). A final eTICI score of ≥2b was achieved in 90.2% of cases (n = 46), and eTICI 2c/3 was seen in 84.3% of cases (n = 43). Furthermore, 24 h CT scans showed that the median ASPECT score was 8 (range 0-10). Good functional outcomes at 90 days (mRS ≤ 2) were achieved in 21.6% of cases (n = 11).

CONCLUSIONS

The Stream device shows acceptable rates of FPE and mFPE compared to existing devices. Further larger studies are required alongside an understanding of the optimal technique for this device's use.

First-line thrombectomy strategy for carotid terminus occlusions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Little research has focused on the performance of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in carotid terminus occlusions (CTOs). Therefore, the best first-line thrombectomy strategy for CTOs remains unclear.

Purpose

To compare the safety and efficacy outcomes of three first-line thrombectomy techniques in CTOs.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials databases. Studies providing safety and efficacy outcomes for endovascular treatment of CTOs were included. Data regarding successful recanalization, functional independence, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and first pass efficacy (FPE) were extracted from the included studies. A random-effects model was used to calculate prevalence rates and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI), and subgroup analyses were performed to assess the impact of the initial MT technique on safety and efficacy outcomes.

Results

Six studies with 524 patients were included. The overall successful recanalization rate was 85.84% (95% CI = 77.96-94.52), and subgroup analysis did not show a significant difference among the three first-line MT techniques. Overall rates of functional independence and FPE were 39.73% (95% CI = 32.95-47.89) and 32.09% (95% CI = 22.93-44.92), respectively. The combined stent retriever (SR) and aspiration (ASP) technique achieved significantly higher first-pass efficacy rates compared to SR or ASP alone. The overall sICH rate was 9.89% (95% CI = 4.88-20.07), and subgroup analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference across groups. The sICH rates of SR, ASP, and SR + ASP were 8.49% (95% CI = 1.76-40.93), 6.8% (95% CI = 4.59-10.09), and 7.12% (95% CI = 0.27-100), respectively.

Conclusions

Our results support that MT is highly effective for CTOs with functional independence rates of 39%. Additionally, in our meta-analysis, the SR + ASP technique was associated significantly greater rates of FPE compared to SR or ASP alone, without an increase in sICH rates. Prospective, large-scale studies are necessary to determine the optimal first-line MT technique in the endovascular treatment of CTOs.

First-pass effect in patients with acute basilar artery occlusions undergoing stent retriever thrombectomy

OBJECTIVE

First-pass effect (FPE), defined as successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b-3) with a single stent retriever attempt without salvage treatment, has not been fully identified in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO). The authors' aim was to assess the impact of FPE on efficacy and safety for patients with BAO.

METHODS

The authors included data from the Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Study (BASILAR) about patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy within 24 hours after symptom onset and compared the clinical outcomes of patients who achieved FPE with those who did not. In addition, the authors further compared outcomes between patients with FPE and those with final successful reperfusion achieved with salvage treatment. The primary clinical outcome was favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 3).

RESULTS

Among 471 enrolled patients, FPE was achieved in 83 (17.6%) who underwent acute BAO thrombectomy. FPE was strongly associated with favorable outcome (adjusted OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.56-5.16, p = 0.001), lower rate of mortality (28.9% of FPE patients vs 48.2% of non-FPE patients, p = 0.001), and shorter median time from groin puncture to recanalization (65 minutes vs 110 minutes, p < 0.001). Occlusion site of the distal basilar artery, cardioembolism, and undetermined etiology were positive predictors of FPE, whereas baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was a negative predictor. Compared with final successful reperfusion, FPE also contributed independently to favorable outcomes (adjusted OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.23-4.10, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

FPE was associated with 90-day favorable outcome in patients with acute BAO who underwent stent retriever thrombectomy within 24 hours. Clinical trial registration no.: ChiCTR1800014759 (www.chictr.org.cn).

First-Pass Recanalization with EmboTrap II in Acute Ischemic Stroke (FREE-AIS): A Multicenter Prospective Study

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of EmboTrap II in terms of first-pass recanalization and to determine whether it could yield favorable outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this multicenter, prospective study, we consecutively enrolled patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy using EmboTrap II as a front-line device. The primary outcome was the first pass effect (FPE) rate defined by modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) grade 2c or 3 by the first pass of EmboTrap II. In addition, modified FPE (mFPE; mTICI grade 2b-3 by the first pass of EmboTrap II), successful recanalization (final mTICI grade 2b-3), and clinical outcomes were assessed. We also analyzed the effect of FPE on a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at 3 months.

RESULTS

Two hundred-ten patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 73.3 ± 11.4 years; male, 55.7%) were included. Ninety-nine patients (47.1%) had FPE, and mFPE was achieved in 150 (71.4%) patients. Successful recanalization was achieved in 191 (91.0%) patients. Among them, 164 (85.9%) patients underwent successful recanalization by exclusively using EmboTrap II. The time from groin puncture to FPE was 25.0 minutes (interquartile range, 17.0-35.0 minutes). Procedure-related complications were observed in seven (3.3%) patients. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage developed in 14 (6.7%) patients. One hundred twenty-three (58.9% of 209 completely followed) patients had an mRS score of 0-2. Sixteen (7.7% of 209) patients died during the follow-up period. Patients who had successful recanalization with FPE were four times more likely to have an mRS score of 0-2 than those who had successful recanalization without FPE (adjusted odds ratio, 4.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.59-10.8; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Mechanical thrombectomy using the front-line EmboTrap II is effective and safe. In particular, FPE rates were high. Achieving FPE was important for an mRS score of 0-2, even in patients with successful recanalization.

First pass effect in posterior circulation occlusions: Analysis from the CICAT registry

BACKGROUND

The first pass effect (FPE) is an independent predictor of functional independence in patients with large vessel occlusion in anterior circulation ischemic strokes. However, whether it predicts outcome in posterior circulation large vessel occlusion (PC-LVO) is uncertain. We aimed to study the frequency, characteristics, and predictors of FPE and its association with clinical outcomes in PC-LVO.

METHOD

We performed an analysis from the prospective CICAT Registry. All patients with PC-LVO who underwent endovascular therapy between January 2016 and January 2020 were included. A centrally assessed clinical follow-up was performed at 3 months by blinded investigators. FPE was defined as the achievement of modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction 3 in a single pass of the endovascular thrombectomy device, and multi-pass effect (MPE) if it was achieved in more than one pass. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify whether FPE is an independent predictor of functional independence defined as a modified Rankin Score of 0-2.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 265 patients in who FPE was achieved in 105 (39.6%). Patients with FPE were more likely to achieve functional independence compared to the non-FPE group (52.4% vs 25.1%, p < .001) and the MPE group (52.4% vs 26.7%, p < .001). FPE was independently associated with functional independence (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-4.37) but MPE was not (aOR: 0.92, 95% CI 0.40-2.13). Independent predictors of FPE were the use of direct aspiration, embolic mechanism of stroke, and the absence of general anesthesia (GA) use.

CONCLUSIONS

FPE is an independent predictor of functional independence in PC-LVO and was associated with a significantly better outcome than MPE.

Predictors and outcomes of first pass efficacy in posterior circulation strokes: Insights from STAR collaboration

Background: First-pass efficacy (FPE) has been established as an important predictor of favorable functional outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy (ET) in anterior circulation strokes. In this retrospective cohort study, we investigate predictors and clinical outcomes of FPE in posterior circulation strokes (pcAIS). Methods: The Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry database was used to identify pcAIS patients who achieved FPE. Their baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared with the non-FPE group. The primary outcome was a 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0-3. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) analyses were done to evaluate predictors of FPE. Safety outcomes included distal emboli, vessel rupture, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality. Results: Of 359 patients, 179 (50%) achieved FPE. Clot burden, occlusion site, and ET technique-related variables were similar between the two groups except for shorter procedure time with FPE. The primary outcome was significantly better with FPE (56.4% vs. 32.8%, p < 0.001). Complications were similar except for a higher rate of distal emboli in non-FPE group (11.1% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.032). Atrial fibrillation (Afib) had increased odds (aOR: 2.06, 95% CI; 1.24, 3.4, p = 0.005) and prior ischemic stroke had decreased odds (aOR: 0.524, 95% CI; 0.28, 0.97, p = 0.04) of FPE. Afib was the only independent predictor of FPE on MVA (1.94, 95% CI; 1.1, 3.43, p = 0.022). Conclusions: Higher rate of FPE in Afib-related pcAIS could possibly be explained by the differences in clot composition and degree of in-situ atherosclerotic disease burden. Future studies are warranted to explore the relationship of clot composition with ET outcomes.

The initial experience with the Embotrap III stent-retriever in a real world setting

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of our prospectively maintained database to identify all patients treated with the Embotrap 3 stent-retriever between January 2021 and January 2022. We recorded the baseline demographics, NIHSS, ASPECT score and clot characteristics, first pass and final eTICI scores, complications and 90 day mRS.

RESULTS

One hundred and ten patients met the inclusion criteria, average age 69 ± 14 years, 50% were male (n = 55). The median NIHSS at presentation was 18 (range 3-30) and 58.2% received IV tPA prior to MT. The median ASPECT score on plain CT was 8 with average clot length 20.2 ± 14.8 mm (n = 93). The first pass effect (FPE) was seen in 41.8% of cases with modified FPE seen in 59.1%. A 24-hour CT scan (n = 97) showed median ASPECTs of 7. 43.8% of patients achieve mRS ≤ 2 at 90-day mRS (n = 64).

CONCLUSION

The Embotrap 3 stent-retriever has a high rate of FPE and final recanalization in this real world cohort of patients.

Predictors of first pass effect and effect on outcomes in mechanical thrombectomy for basilar artery occlusion

INTRODUCTION

For patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), those who are recanalized with a successful single pass (first pass effect, FPE) have better functional outcomes than those who do not. There is a scarcity of data regarding predictors of FPE in basilar artery occlusion (BAO). We aim to determine what characteristics may predict FPE for posterior circulation thrombectomies in a cohort of patients undergoing EVT for BAO.

METHODS

We reviewed prospectively-collected data for patients presenting to a comprehensive stroke center with BAO between December 2015 and April 2019. Patients were included in this study if they underwent manual aspiration thrombectomy for BAO. Patients were excluded if they had occlusions of the posterior cerebral or vertebral arteries or if they had tandem lesions. Patients were stratified by whether FPE or modified FPE (mFPE) was achieved, and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of FPE and the effect of FPE on clinical outcome.

RESULTS

100 patients with BAO underwent thrombectomy. Mean age was 64.7 ± 16.7, 42% were female, and median NIHSS was 20 (IQR 11-27). 33% met criteria for FPE and 60% for mFPE. Univariate analysis identified female gender, lack of IV-tPA use, pcASPECTS, atrial fibrillation, and hyperlipidemia as possible predictors of FPE. On multivariate analysis, age, pcASPECTs, atrial fibrillation, hyperlipidemia and IV-tPA use were not independent predictors of FPE or mFPE. Female gender was an independent predictor of mFPE (p = 0.02), but not FPE (p = 0.18). FPE was a predictor of mRS 0-2 at 90 days (p = 0.04). Predictors of mortality were age (p < 0.01), baseline NIHSS (p < 0.01) and mFPE (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In this cohort analysis of 100 patients with basilar artery occlusion undergoing manual aspiration thrombectomy, female gender was associated with mFPE but not FPE. Previously-reported anterior circulation FPE predictors including age, ASPECTS and atrial fibrillation were not predictors of FPE in this cohort of patients with BAO.

Effect of first pass reperfusion on outcome in patients with posterior circulation ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND

First pass reperfusion (FPR), that is, excellent reperfusion (expanded treatment in cerebral ischemia (eTICI) 2C-3) in one pass, after endovascular treatment (EVT) of an occluded artery in the anterior circulation, is associated with favorable clinical outcome, even when compared with multiple pass excellent reperfusion (MPR). In patients with posterior circulation ischemic stroke (PCS), the same association is expected, but currently unknown. We aimed to assess characteristics associated with FPR and the influence of FPR versus MPR on outcomes in patients with PCS.

METHODS

We used data from the MR CLEAN Registry, a prospective observational study. The effect of FPR on 24-hour National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, as percentage reduction, and on modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 3 months, was tested with linear and ordinal logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Of 224 patients with PCS, 45 patients had FPR, 47 had MPR, and 90 had no excellent reperfusion (eTICI <2C). We did not find an association between any of the patient, imaging, or treatment characteristics and FPR. FPR was associated with better NIHSS (-45% (95% CI: -65% to -12%)) and better mRS scores (adjusted common odds ratio (acOR): 2.16 (95% CI: 1.23 to 3.79)) compared with no FPR. Outcomes after FPR were also more favorable compared with MPR, but the effect was smaller and not statistically significant (NIHSS: -14% (95% CI: -51% to 49%), mRS acOR: 1.50 (95% CI: 0.75 to 3.00)).

CONCLUSIONS

FPR in patients with PCS is associated with favorable clinical outcome in comparison with no FPR. In comparison with MPR, the effect of FPR was no longer statistically significant. Nevertheless, our data support the notion that FPR should be the treatment target to pursue in every patient treated with EVT.

First Pass Effect With Neurothrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Analysis of the Systematic Evaluation of Patients Treated With Stroke Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke Registry

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Achieving complete revascularization after a single pass of a mechanical thrombectomy device (first pass effect [FPE]) is associated with good clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. We assessed patient characteristics, outcomes, and predictors of FPE among a large real-world cohort of patients (Systematic Evaluation of Patients Treated with Stroke Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke registry).

METHODS

Demographics, clinical outcomes, and procedural characteristics were analyzed among patients in whom FPE (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2c/3 after first pass) was achieved versus those requiring multiple passes (MP). Modified FPE and modified MP included patients achieving modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2B-3. Primary outcomes included 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score and mortality.

RESULTS

Among 984 Systematic Evaluation of Patients Treated with Stroke Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke patients, 930 had complete 90-day follow-up. FPE was achieved in 40.5% (377/930) of patients and MP in 20.0% (186/930). Baseline characteristics were similar across all groups. The FPE group had fewer internal carotid artery occlusions compared with MP (P=0.029). The FPE group had faster puncture to recanalization time (P≤0.001), higher rates of 90-day mRS score of 0 to 1 (52.6% versus 38.6%, P=0.003), mRS score of 0 to 2 (65.4% versus 52.0%, P=0.003), and lower 90-day mortality compared with the MP group (12.0% versus 18.7%, P=0.038). Similarly, compared with modified MP patients, the modified FPE group had fewer internal carotid artery occlusions (P=0.004), faster puncture to recanalization time (P≤0.001), and higher rates of 90-day mRS score of 0 to 1 (P=0.002) and mRS score of 0 to 2 (P=0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that FPE and modified FPE are associated with superior clinical outcomes.

Initial Experience With the Trevo NXT Stent Retriever

Background: The application of a new coating to the delivery wire of the Trevo retriever has the potential to improve its handling. We therefore report our initial experience with this new stent retriever for mechanical thrombectomy of large and medium vessel occlusions. Methods: We pooled data of four high-volume European stroke centers over the time period from October 2020 to February 2021. Patients were included in our study if the Trevo NXT stent retriever was used as a first-line device. Primary endpoints were first-pass near-complete or complete reperfusion, defined as mTICI score of ≥2c. Secondary endpoints were final reperfusion, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at 24 h and discharge, device malfunctions, complications during the procedure, and subjective ratings of the interventionalists regarding device functionality. Results: Eighty patients (39 women, mean age 74 ± 14 years) were eligible for our study. Median NIHSS at admission was 15 (IQR, 8-19), and median Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score at baseline was 9 (IQR, 8-10). In 74 (93%) patients a primary combined approach was used as first-line technique. First-pass near-complete reperfusion was achieved in 43 (54%) and first-pass complete reperfusion in 34 (43%) patients. Final near-complete reperfusion was achieved in 66 (83%) patients after a median of 1.5 (1-3) passes, while final successful reperfusion was observed in 96% of our cases. We observed no device malfunctions. Median NIHSS at discharge was 2 (IQR, 0-5), and 3 patients (4%) suffered a symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Conclusions: Based on our initial data, we conclude that the Trevo NXT is an effective and safe tool for mechanical thrombectomy especially when used for combined approaches.

Effect of distal access catheter tip position on angiographic and clinical outcomes following thrombectomy using the combined stent-retriever and aspiration approach

Purpose

Mechanical thrombectomy using the stent-retriever in conjunction with the distal access catheter may improve the rates of successful revascularization and clinical outcomes in patients with acute stroke. We aimed to compare two different thrombectomy techniques, according to the position of the distal access catheter tip in the combined stent-retriever and aspiration approach.

Methods

In this retrospective study, patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion treated with the combined technique were divided into two groups based on the tip position of the distal access catheter: distal group (catheter placed adjacent to the thrombus) and proximal group (catheter placed in the cavernous segment of the internal carotid artery below the ophthalmic artery). Baseline characteristics, angiographic results, and clinical outcomes were compared.

Results

Eighty-three patients (distal group, n = 45; proximal group, n = 38) were included. Higher complete reperfusion was observed in the distal group (unweighted analysis: 66.7% vs. 42.1%, p = 0.025; weighted analysis: 74.0% vs. 28.8%; p = 0.002). In the multivariate analysis, the distal tip position was independently associated with complete reperfusion (unweighted analysis: aOR, 4.10; 95% CI, 1.40–11.98; p = 0.01; weighted analysis: aOR, 5.20; 95% CI, 1.72–15.78; p = 0.004). The distal group also showed more favorable clinical outcomes and early neurological improvement (unweighted analysis: 62.2% vs. 55.3%; p = 0.521, 60% vs. 50%; p = 0.361, respectively; weighted analysis: 62.7% vs. 61.1%; p = 0.877, 66% vs. 45.7%; p = 0.062, respectively). However, more arterial dissections were observed in the distal group (8.9%, n = 4 vs. 2.6%, n = 1; p = 0.36). In the distal group, one patient with vascular injury died due to complications. No cases of emboli in new territory were observed.

Conclusions

Distal tip position of the distal access catheter has a significant impact on reperfusion in patients with acute ischemic stroke. However, there was also a higher rate of vascular injury as the catheter was advanced further. If advancement to the target lesion is too difficult, placing it in the cavernous internal carotid artery may be a viable method without complications.