Endovascular reperfusion outcomes in patients with a stroke and low ASPECTS is highly dependent on baseline infarct volumes

Endovascular thrombectomy versus medical management on outcomes with infarct volumes more than 70 mL

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with large infarct volume remains controversial. The aim of this study is to compare clinical outcomes between EVT and medical management in acute large vessel occlusion with infarct volumes larger than 70 mL on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI).

METHODS

A prospective observational cohort study was conducted, including patients with anterior cerebral circulation occlusion due to ischemic stroke with infarct volumes larger than 70 mL within 24 h of onset between July 2018 and June 2023. Eligible patients were divided into two groups: the EVT group and the medical management (non-EVT) group. The main outcomes were functional independence and mortality at 90 days. To assess clinical endpoints, we selected variables including age, NIHSS score, infarct volume, and occlusion location for 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching and PS adjustment using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).

RESULTS

Among the 131 identified patients (mean [SD] age, 69.9 [13.7] years; 58 female), the median infarct volume was 123.6 mL. Of these patients, 75 (57.3%) underwent EVT. After PS adjustment, EVT was not associated with functional independence (10.9% vs. 10.9%; p = 1.000) or mortality (43.5% vs. 47.8%; p = 0.675). Additionally, after PS adjustment using IPTW, EVT was also not associated with a functional independence (15.8% vs. 13.7%; p = 0.767) or mortality (46.8% vs. 44.0%; p = 0.762).

CONCLUSION

This study provides real-world evidence regarding infarct volumes larger than 70 mL, indicating that EVT does not provide benefits compared to medical management alone when considering age, NIHSS score, infarct volume, and occlusion location.

Outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy in stroke patients with extreme large infarction core

BACKGROUND

Recent clinical trials have demonstrated that patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) and large infarction core may still benefit from mechanical thrombectomy (MT). In this study, we evaluate outcomes of MT in LVO patients presenting with extremely large infarction core Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS 0-2).

METHODS

Data from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) was interrogated. We identified thrombectomy patients presenting with an occlusion in the intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) or M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery and extremely large infarction core (ASPECTS 0-2). A favorable outcome was defined by achieving a modified Rankin scale of 0-3 at 90 days post-MT. Successful recanalization was defined by achieving a modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) score ≥2B.

RESULTS

We identified 58 patients who presented with ASPECTS 0-2 and underwent MT. Median age was 74.0 (66.3-80.0) years, 30 (51.7%) were females, and 16 (27.6%) patients received intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. There was no difference regarding the location of the occlusion (p=0.57). Aspiration thrombectomy was performed in 34 (64.2%) patients and stent retriever was used in 8 (15.1%) patients. In patients presenting with ASPECTS 0-2 the mortality rate was 41.4%, 31% had mRS 0-3 at day 90, 66.67% ≥70 years of age had mRS of 5-6 at day 90. On multivariable analysis, age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale on admission, and successful recanalization (mTICI ≥2B) were independently associated with favorable outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicentered, retrospective cohort study suggests that MT may be beneficial in a select group of patients with ASPECTS 0-2.

A cortically-weighted versus total Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score in thrombectomy outcome models

OBJECTIVES

Individual subcortical infarct scoring for the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) can be difficult and is subjected to higher inter-reader variability. This study compares performance of the 10-point ASPECTS with a new 7-point cortically-weighted score in predicting post-thrombectomy functional outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospective registry data from two comprehensive stroke centers (Site 1 2016-2021; Site 2: 2019-2021) included patients with either M1 segment of middle cerebral artery or internal carotid artery occlusions who underwent thrombectomy. Two multivariate proportional odds training models utilizing either 10-point or 7-point ASPECTS predicting 90-day shift in modified Rankin score were generated using Site 1 data and validated with Site 2 data. Models were compared using multiclass receiver operator characteristics, corrected Akaike's Information Criterion, and likelihood ratio test.

RESULTS

Of 328 patients (Site 1 = 181, Site 2 = 147), median age was 71y (IQR 61-82), 119 (36%) had internal carotid artery occlusions, and median 10-point ASPECTS was 9 (IQR 8-10). There was no difference in performance between models using either total or cortically-weighted ASPECTS (p=0.14). Validation cohort data were correctly (i.e., predicting modified Rankin score within one point) classified 50% (cortically-weighted score model) and 56% (total score model) of the time.

CONCLUSIONS

The 7-point cortically-weighted ASPECTS was similarly predictive of post-thrombectomy functional outcome as 10-point ASPECTS. Given noninferior performance, the cortically-weighted score is a potentially reliable, but simplified, alternative to the traditional scoring paradigm, with potential implications in automated image analysis tool development.

The prognostic value of ASPECTS in specific regions following mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke from large-vessel occlusion

Objective

The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between the volume of specific regional infarction and the prognosis of patients who undergo mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute large vessel occlusion.

Methods

In this study, we collected the clinical and imaging features of patients with unilateral acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke from January 2021 to June 2023 in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University. All patients underwent CT perfusion and non-contrast CT scan before MT. The ASPECTS was assessed based on imaging data, and artificial intelligence was used to obtain the percentage of infarction in each of the 10 regions of ASPECTS. According to the modified Rankin Scale, the patients were divided into the good prognosis group and poor prognosis group at the 90-day follow-up. Various indicators in the two groups were compared. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the risk factors for poor prognosis. The relationship between core infarction volume and the probability of poor prognosis was plotted to analyze the trend of poor prognosis with changes in the proportion of infarction volume. Finally, a receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to analyze the predictive ability on poor prognosis.

Results

A total of 91 patients were included, with 58 patients having a good prognosis (mRS ≤ 2) and 33 patients having a poor prognosis (mRS ≥ 3). Multivariate analysis showed that NIHSS score and core infarction involving the internal capsule and M6 region were independent risk factors for poor prognosis. According to the linear correlation, a higher ratio of core infarction volume in the internal capsule or M6 region was linked to an increased risk of a poor prognosis. However, the non-linear analysis revealed that the prognostic impact of core infarction volume was significant when the ratio was greater than 69.7%. The ROC curve indicated that the combination of NIHSS score, infarct location, and the ratio of infarct volume has an AUC of 0.87, with a sensitivity of 84.8% and a specificity of 84.5%.

Conclusion

It is important to examine the location and volume of the infarct in the internal capsule and M6 when deciding whether to do a MT.

Automated advanced imaging in acute ischemic stroke. Certainties and uncertainties

The purpose of this is study was to review pearls and pitfalls of advanced imaging, such as computed tomography perfusion and diffusion-weighed imaging and perfusion-weighted imaging in the selection of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients suitable for endovascular treatment (EVT) in the late time window (6-24 h from symptom onset). Advanced imaging can quantify infarct core and ischemic penumbra using specific threshold values and provides optimal selection parameters, collectively called target mismatch. More precisely, target mismatch criteria consist of core volume and/or penumbra volume and mismatch ratio (the ratio between total hypoperfusion and core volumes) with precise cut-off values. The parameters of target mismatch are automatically calculated with dedicated software packages that allow a quick and standardized interpretation of advanced imaging. However, this approach has several limitations leading to a misclassification of core and penumbra volumes. In fact, automatic software platforms are affected by technical artifacts and are not interchangeable due to a remarkable vendor-dependent variability, resulting in different estimate of target mismatch parameters. In addition, advanced imaging is not completely accurate in detecting infarct core, that can be under- or overestimated. Finally, the selection of candidates for EVT remains currently suboptimal due to the high rates of futile reperfusion and overselection caused by the use of very stringent inclusion criteria. For these reasons, some investigators recently proposed to replace advanced with conventional imaging in the selection for EVT, after the demonstration that non-contrast CT ASPECTS and computed tomography angiography collateral evaluation are not inferior to advanced images in predicting outcome in AIS patients treated with EVT. However, other authors confirmed that CTP and PWI/DWI postprocessed images are superior to conventional imaging in establishing the eligibility of patients for EVT. Therefore, the routine application of automatic assessment of advanced imaging remains a matter of debate. Recent findings suggest that the combination of conventional and advanced imaging might improving our selection criteria.

Endovascular therapy for acute stroke with a large infarct core: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

In this meta-analysis, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large core infarct.

METHODS

Three online databases of Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus were systematically searched. Original studies which evaluated AIS participants with large core infarction who underwent EVT were included. R statistical software was used for statistical analyses. Effect sizes were presented with odds ratios (ORs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The effect sizes were pooled using random effects modeling.

RESULTS

Including 47 studies and 15,173 patients, this meta-analysis showed that compared with medical management (MM), EVT was significantly associated with decreased odds of mortality (0.67, 95% CI: 0.51-0.87) and increased odds of favorable outcomes, including a modified Rankin Scale of 0-3 (2.36, 95% CI: 1.69-3.291) and of 0-2 (3.54, 95% CI: 1.96-6.4) in 90 days and remarkable improvement in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale within 48 h after the procedure (3.6, 95% CI:1.32-9.79). Besides, there was a higher chance of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) development (1.88, 95% CI: 1.32-2.68) but not symptomatic ICH (1.34, 95% CI: 0.78-2.31) in those who underwent EVT.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that EVT might be an effective and relatively safe treatment option for the treatment of AIS patients with large vessel occlusion who have large core infarcts, although more large-scale trials are needed to consolidate the results and to make inclusion criteria and the patient selection process clearer.

Mechanical thrombectomy in low Alberta stroke program early CT score (ASPECTS) in hyperacute stroke-a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Major randomized controlled trials of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) failed to include a substantial number of patients presenting with low baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS:0-5). Patients experiencing hyperacute strokes (last known well ≤ 6 h) can potentially benefit most from MT. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to report presentation severity and radiographic and clinical outcomes for hyperacute stroke patients presenting with low-ASPECTS.

METHODS

Our comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to August 31, 2022 included articles reporting patients presenting hyperacutely who underwent MT for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion AIS with an ASPECTS ≤ 5 on baseline imaging. Pooled averages were calculated for age and presenting National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Fixed- and random-effects meta-analyses for weighted estimation of overall rates were performed. Forest plots were generated for proportions and estimated overall outcome rates.

RESULTS

18 studies (1958 patients) were included (mean age = 64.1 years; presenting NIHSS = 18.4). Final modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b-3 grade was achieved in 76.4%, with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in 12.1%. Good (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2) and ambulatory (mRS 0-3) 3-month outcomes were achieved by 27.4 and 46.7%, respectively; 90-day mortality was 26.4%.

CONCLUSION

MT in low-ASPECTS hyperacute stroke patients may result in ambulatory clinical outcomes with acceptable hemorrhage risk. Recanalization rates achieved were similar to those in patients presenting with ASPECTS ≥ 6; this did not fully translate to better clinical outcomes.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

MT should be considered for hyperacute strokes with low presenting ASPECTS.

Mechanical thrombectomy in low Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomographic Score: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Due to their poor natural history and lack in level-I evidence, patients with large vessel occlusion and large core infarcts (Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomographic Score <6) have been excluded from receiving mechanical thrombectomy. This systematic review and meta-analysis seeks to summarize current evidence from published randomized controlled trials to compare the safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy with optimal medical therapy in treating stroke patients with large core infarcts.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials investigating the safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy vs optimal medical therapy in patients presenting with large vessel occlusion and large infarcts. Basic demographic and comorbidities were assessed, and clinical outcomes were compared, including modified Rankin scale 0-3, and 0-2 at 3 months, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, decompressive hemicortectomy, and 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

Three randomized controlled trials totaling 1011 patients (501 and 510 in the medical management and mechanical thrombectomy arm, respectively) were included. Patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy had significantly higher odds of achieving better functional outcomes at 3 months: Modified Rankin scale 0-2 (OR = 3.05, 95% CI = 2.101-4.4021, p < 0.0001) and modified Rankin scale 0-3 (OR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.67-2.89, p < 0.0001) as compared to those receiving optimal medical management. There were no differences between groups in 90-day mortality (OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.70-1.23, p = 0.60), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR = 1.89, 95% = CI 0.95-3.77, p = 0.07) or decompressive hemicraniectomy (OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 0.69-2.25, p = 0.46).

CONCLUSION

Mechanical thrombectomy for patients with large infarcts is associated with improved functional outcomes and a similar safety profile compared to optimal medical management. Ongoing trials will help better refine the target population that benefits the most from treatment.

From therapeutic nihilism to armamentarium: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials assessing safety and efficacy of endovascular therapy for acute large ischemic strokes

BACKGROUND

Three recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigated the potential benefit of endovascular therapy (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke patients presenting with large infarcts. We aimed to confirm the safety and efficacy of EVT in patients presenting with large infarcts and provide more precise estimations of the treatment effects using study-level meta-analysis.

METHODS

Comprehensive search of MEDLINE database through PubMed till February 2023 was performed including RCTs only. The data were then extracted from the selected studies and pooled as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

RESULTS

There were a total of 1005 patients across the three qualifying RCTs. Regarding the functional outcomes assessed by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, the analyzed data demonstrated statistically significant differences in favor of thrombectomy for both independent ambulatory status (mRS 0-3: RR = 1.78, 95% CI [1.28, 2.48], p = 0.0006) and functional independence (mRS 0-2: RR = 2.54, 95% CI [1.85, 3.48], p < 0.001). The analyzed data did not demonstrate any statistically significant differences between EVT and medical management alone in terms of 90-day mortality (RR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.78, 1.16], p = 0.61), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (RR = 1.83, 95% CI [0.95, 3.55], p = 0.07), and need for hemicraniectomy (RR = 1.22, 95% CI [0.43, 3.41], p = 0.71).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the benefit of EVT on functional outcomes of patients presenting with large ischemic infarcts without significant differences in the rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, hemicraniectomy, or 90-day mortality.

Trial of Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke with Large Infarct

BACKGROUND

The role of endovascular therapy for acute stroke with a large infarction has not been extensively studied in differing populations.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized trial in China involving patients with acute large-vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation and an Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score of 3 to 5 (range, 0 to 10, with lower values indicating larger infarction) or an infarct-core volume of 70 to 100 ml. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio within 24 hours from the time they were last known to be well to undergo endovascular therapy and receive medical management or to receive medical management alone. The primary outcome was the score on the modified Rankin scale at 90 days (scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability), and the primary objective was to determine whether a shift in the distribution of the scores on the modified Rankin scale at 90 days had occurred between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included scores of 0 to 2 and 0 to 3 on the modified Rankin scale. The primary safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hours after randomization.

RESULTS

A total of 456 patients were enrolled; 231 were assigned to the endovascular-therapy group and 225 to the medical-management group. Approximately 28% of the patients in both groups received intravenous thrombolysis. The trial was stopped early owing to the efficacy of endovascular therapy after the second interim analysis. At 90 days, a shift in the distribution of scores on the modified Rankin scale toward better outcomes was observed in favor of endovascular therapy over medical management alone (generalized odds ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.11 to 1.69; P = 0.004). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 14 of 230 patients (6.1%) in the endovascular-therapy group and in 6 of 225 patients (2.7%) in the medical-management group; any intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 113 (49.1%) and 39 (17.3%), respectively. Results for the secondary outcomes generally supported those of the primary analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In a trial conducted in China, patients with large cerebral infarctions had better outcomes with endovascular therapy administered within 24 hours than with medical management alone but had more intracranial hemorrhages. (Funded by Covidien Healthcare International Trading [Shanghai] and others; ANGEL-ASPECT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04551664.).

Reversible CT Scan Hypodensity in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patient With Low Initial Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) Following Endovascular Thrombectomy: A Case Report

According to current American and European guidelines, mechanical thrombectomy is recommended only for patients with an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) of 6 or higher. However, recent literature suggests that the potential benefits of reperfusion therapy should not be solely determined by baseline ASPECTS. In this case report, we present a young female patient with a low initial ASPECTS (4-5), who underwent mechanical thrombectomy and showed marked improvement in both CT imaging and clinical symptoms. Our findings potentially show that mechanical thrombectomy may be beneficial even for patients with an initial ASPECTS ≤ 5. These results may contribute to the growing evidence supporting the use of mechanical thrombectomy as a viable treatment option for acute ischemic stroke patients with low baseline ASPECTS.

Neurological Functional Independence After Endovascular Thrombectomy and Different Imaging Modalities for Large Infarct Core Assessment : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the rate of neurological functional independence (NFI) at 90 days in patients with large infarct core (LIC), which was evaluated by different imaging modalities before endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).

METHODS

PubMed and EMBASE were searched for original studies on clinical functional outcomes at 90 days in LIC patients who received EVT treatment from inception to 28 September 2021. The pooled NFI rates were calculated using random effects model according to different imaging modalities and criteria.

RESULTS

We included 34 studies enrolling 2997 LIC patients. The NFI rates were 23% (95% confidence interval, CI 15-32%) and 24% (95% CI 10-38%) when LIC was defined as core volume ≥50 ml and ≥ 70 ml separately on computed tomography perfusion, 36% (95% CI 23-48%) and 21% (95% CI 17-25%) when LIC was defined as core volume ≥ 50 ml and ≥ 70 ml separately on magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), 28% (95% CI 24-32%) and 37% (95% CI 21-53%) when LIC was defined as DWI-ASPECTS ≤ 5 and ≤ 6 separately, 23% (95% CI 19-27%) and 32% (95% CI 18-46%) when LIC was defined as NCCT-ASPECTS ≤ 5 and ≤ 6 separately.

CONCLUSION

Similar NFI rates could be obtained after EVT in LIC patients if proper LIC criteria were select according to the imaging modality.

Association of baseline core volume and early midline shift in acute stroke patients with a large ischaemic core

Background

Midline shift (MLS) is troublesome problem that may occur in patients with a large infarct core (LIC) and may be related to the baseline infarct core volume. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between baseline infarct core volume and early MLS presence.

Materials and methods

Patients with acute intracranial large artery occlusion and a pretreatment relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) <30% volume ≥50 ml on CT perfusion (CTP) were included, clinical outcomes following endovascular treatment (EVT) were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was MLS within 48 h (early MLS presence). The association between baseline ICV and early MLS presence was evaluated with multivariable regression.

Results

Ultimately, 95 patients were included, and 29.5% (28/95) of the patients had early MLS. The number of patients with a baseline rCBF < 15% volume (median [interquartile range], 46 [32-60] vs. 29 [19-40]; P < 0.001) was significantly larger in the early severe MLS presence group. A baseline rCBF < 15% volume showed significantly better predictive accuracy for early MLS presence than an rCBF < 30% volume (area under the curve, 0.74 vs. 0.64, P = 0.0023). In addition, an rCBF < 15% volume ≥40 ml (odds ratio, 4.34 [95% CI, 1.571-11.996]) was associated with early MLS presence after adjustment for sex, age, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, onset-to-recanalization time.

Conclusion

In patients with an acute LIC following EVT, a pretreatment infarct core volume > 40 ml based on an rCBF < 15% showed good predictive value for early MLS occurrence.

Follow-Up Infarct Volume Prediction by CTP-Based Hypoperfusion Index, and the Discrepancy between Small Follow-Up Infarct Volume and Poor Functional Outcome-A Multicenter Study

(1) Background: Follow-up infarct volume (FIV) may have implications for prognostication in acute ischemic stroke patients. Factors predicting the discrepancy between FIV and 90-day outcomes are poorly understood. We aimed to develop a comprehensive predictive model of FIV and explore factors associated with the discrepancy. (2) Methods: Patients with acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion were included. Baseline clinical and CT features were extracted and analyzed, including the CTP-based hypoperfusion index (HI) and the NCCT-based e-ASPECT, measured by automated software. FIV was assessed on follow-up NCCT at 3−7 days. Multiple linear regression was used to construct the predictive model. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore factors associated with poor outcomes (90-mRS scores 3−6) in small FIV (<70 mL). (3) Results: There were 170 patients included. Baseline e-ASPECT, infarct core volume, hypoperfusion volume, HI, baseline international normalized ratio, and successful recanalization were associated with FIV and included in constructing the predictive model. Baseline NIHSS, baseline hypertension, stroke history, and current tobacco use were associated with poor outcomes in small FIV. (4) Conclusions: A comprehensive predictive model (including HI) of FIV was constructed. We also emphasized the importance of hypertension and smoking status at baseline for the functional outcomes in patients with a small FIV.

Endovascular treatment for anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion ischemic stroke with low ASPECTS: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients presenting with Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) 0-5 has not yet proven safe and effective by clinical trials.

Objectives

The aim of the study was to assess whether EVT in AIS patients presenting with low ASPECTS is beneficial.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis of available studies in accordance with the PRISMA statement.

Data sources and Methods

We have searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and reference lists of articles published until 28 May 2022 with the aim to calculate (1) modified Rankin scale (mRS) score 0-3 at 3 months, (2) mRS score 0-2 at 3 months, (3) symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and (3) mortality at 3 months.

Results

Overall, 24 eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis, comprising a total of 2539 AIS patients with ASPECTS 0-5 treated with EVT. The pooled proportion of EVT-treated patients achieving mRS 0-3 at 3 months was calculated at 38.4%. The pooled proportion of EVT-treated patients achieving mRS 0-2 at 3 months was 25.7%. Regarding safety outcomes, sICH occurred in 12.8% of patients. The 3-month pooled mortality was 30%. In pairwise meta-analysis, patients treated with EVT had a higher likelihood of achieving mRS 0-3 at 3 months compared with patients treated with best medical therapy (BMT, OR: 2.41). sICH occurred more frequently in EVT-treated patients compared with the BMT-treated patients (OR: 2.30). Mortality at 3 months was not different between the two treatment groups (OR: 0.71).

Conclusion

EVT may be beneficial for AIS patients with low baseline ASPECTS despite an increased risk for sICH. Further data from randomized-controlled clinical trials are needed to elucidate the role of EVT in this subgroup of AIS patients.

Registration

The protocol has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Ongoing Systematic Reviews PROSPERO; Registration Number: CRD42022334417.

Endovascular treatment vs drug therapy alone in patients with mild ischemic stroke and large infarct cores

BACKGROUND

Treatment decision making is strictly associated with the outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke who show a large core infarct. Medical care alone may result in suboptimal treatment efficacy, and endovascular treatment may be accompanied by safety issues. Whether endovascular treatment is superior to medical care is not well investigated in the clinical studies.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy of endovascular treatment and drug therapy alone in mild ischemic stroke patients with large infarct cores.

METHODS

Fifty patients with mild ischemic stroke and 50 patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by anterior large vessel occlusion were selected at the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University between January 2021 and December 2021. Patients were divided into an endovascular therapy group and a drug therapy group according to different treatment methods. In the endovascular therapy group, there were 28 patients with minor stroke and 22 patients with large infarct cores. The drug therapy group had 22 patients with minor stroke and 28 patients with large infarct cores. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores were collected and compared between the two groups immediately after the operation and 24 h and 7 d after the operation. The modified Rankin scale (mRS) and/or activity of daily living were assessed at hospital discharge.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in NIHSS scores between the two groups before the operation (P > 0.05). NIHSS scores were lower in the endovascular therapy group than in the drug therapy group at 24 h and 7 d after the operation and at hospital discharge (all P < 0.05). The incidence of early neurologic deterioration was significantly lower in the endovascular therapy group than in the drug therapy group (P < 0.05). At hospital discharge, the mRS score was lower in the endovascular treatment group than in the drug therapy group, and the activity of daily living score was better in the endovascular treatment group than in the drug therapy group (all P < 0.05). During a follow-up of 3 mo, 17 patients (34.0%) had good prognosis (mRS ≤ 2), 33 patients (66.0%) had poor prognosis (mRS > 2), and 11 patients (22.0%) died. In the medical treatment group, 16 patients (mRS ≤ 2) had good prognosis (32.0%), 34 patients (mRS > 2) had poor prognosis (68.0%), and 14 patients (28.0%) died. There was no significant difference in prognosis and mortality between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Endovascular therapy can improve NIHSS score and mRS score in patients with mild ischemic stroke and large infarct cores. It is suitable for clinical application.

Endovascular therapy in acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusive patients with a large infarct core (ANGEL-ASPECT): protocol of a multicentre randomised trial

BACKGROUND

The benefit of stroke thrombectomy for large infarct core still lacks robust randomised controlled studies.

AIM

To demonstrate the design of a clinical trial on endovascular therapy for acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) patients with large infarct core volume.

DESIGN

ANGEL-ASPECT is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded End-point trial to evaluate whether best medical management (BMM) combined with endovascular therapy improves neurological functional outcomes as compared with BMM alone in acute LVO patients with Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) of 3-5 on non-contrast CT or infarct core volume range of 70-100 mL (defined as rCBF <30% on CT perfusion or ADC <620 on MRI) up to 24 hours from symptom onset or last seen well.

STUDY OUTCOMES

The primary efficacy outcome is 90 (±7) days modified Rankin Scale. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage within 48 hours from randomisation is the primary safety outcome.

DISCUSSION

The ANGEL-ASPECT trial will screen patients with large infarct core (ASPECTS 3-5 or 70-100 mL) through image evaluation criteria within 24 hours and explore the efficacy and safety of endovascular therapy compared with BMM.

Effect of Intravenous Tirofiban vs Placebo Before Endovascular Thrombectomy on Functional Outcomes in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: The RESCUE BT Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Tirofiban is a highly selective nonpeptide antagonist of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor, which reversibly inhibits platelet aggregation. It remains uncertain whether intravenous tirofiban is effective to improve functional outcomes for patients with large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and adverse events of intravenous tirofiban before endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This investigator-initiated, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was implemented at 55 hospitals in China, enrolling 948 patients with stroke and proximal intracranial large vessel occlusion presenting within 24 hours of time last known well. Recruitment took place between October 10, 2018, and October 31, 2021, with final follow-up on January 15, 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants received intravenous tirofiban (n = 463) or placebo (n = 485) prior to endovascular thrombectomy.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was disability level at 90 days as measured by overall distribution of the modified Rankin Scale scores from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death). The primary safety outcome was the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hours.

RESULTS

Among 948 patients randomized (mean age, 67 years; 391 [41.2%] women), 948 (100%) completed the trial. The median (IQR) 90-day modified Rankin Scale score in the tirofiban group vs placebo group was 3 (1-4) vs 3 (1-4). The adjusted common odds ratio for a lower level of disability with tirofiban vs placebo was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.86-1.36). Incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 9.7% in the tirofiban group vs 6.4% in the placebo group (difference, 3.3% [95% CI, -0.2% to 6.8%]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy, treatment with intravenous tirofiban, compared with placebo, before endovascular therapy resulted in no significant difference in disability severity at 90 days. The findings do not support use of intravenous tirofiban before endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR-IOR-17014167.

Prediction of 90 day home time among patients with low baseline ASPECTS undergoing endovascular thrombectomy: results from Alberta's Provincial Stroke Registry (QuICR)

BACKGROUND

The benefit of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in stroke patients with a low baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS, ≤5) is uncertain. We aim to use random forest regression modeling to predict 90 day home time in patients with low ASPECTS.

METHODS

We used the Quality Improvement and Clinical Research (QuICR) provincial stroke registry and administrative data from southern Alberta to identify patients who underwent EVT in our center from July 2015 to November 2020. Baseline ASPECTS on non-contrast CT and CT angiography data were scored by a two physician consensus. The primary outcome was the predicted 90 day home time (the number of nights a patient is back at their premorbid living situation without an increase in level of care within 90 days of the stroke) using random forests regression. Estimates were generated using 200 bootstrapped datasets. Covariate contribution to home time was determined using partial dependence plots.

RESULTS

Of 657 EVT patients, 85 (12.9%) had baseline ASPECTS ≤5 (mean age 70.9 years, 44.7% women, 93.9% good-moderate collaterals, 60% M1-middle cerebral artery occlusion). Using partial dependence estimates, mean predicted home times were similar in the low ASPECTS (44.3 days) versus higher ASPECTS (43.1) groups. Factors predicting lower 90 day home time in this population were diabetes mellitus (-8.8 days), hypertension (-5.7 days), and atrial fibrillation (-3.6 days). There was no meaningful difference in predicted 90 day home time by sex, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Severity Scale score, occlusion site, tandem lesion, collateral grade or thrombolysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with low ASPECTS who are selected for EVT using demographic and clinical profiles similar to higher ASPECTS patients achieved comparable outcomes.

Decision-making strategies for reperfusion therapies: navigating through stroke trials gaps

Despite there being a robust amount of literature and numerous randomized clinical trials regarding acute ischemic stroke treatment, the trials have not included some frequent controversial situations for which decision-making strategies are an urgent and unmet need in clinical practice. This article tries to summarize the current evidence about some selected situations (mechanical thrombectomy in low ASPECTS, low NIHSS with proximal occlusion, acute basilar occlusion, distal and medium vessel occlusion, among others), make suggestions on how to approach them in clinical practice and show what to expect in acute stroke research in the near future.