Treatment choices in elderly patients with ST: elevation myocardial infarction-insights from the Vital Heart Response registry

An exploration of the early discharge approach for low-risk STEMI patients following primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Recently, there has been growing interest in the early discharge strategy for low-risk patients who have undergone primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to treat ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). So far findings have suggested there are multiple advantages of shorter hospital stays, including that it could be a safe way to be more cost- and resource-efficient, reduce cases of hospital-acquired infection and boost patient satisfaction. However, there are remaining concerns surrounding safety, patient education, adequate follow-up and the generalisability of the findings from current studies which are mostly small-scale. By assessing the current research, we describe the advantages, disadvantages and challenges of early hospital discharge for STEMI and discuss the factors that determine if a patient can be considered low risk. If it is feasible to safely employ a strategy like this, the implications for healthcare systems worldwide could be extremely beneficial, particularly in lower-income economies and when we consider the detrimental impacts of the recent COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare systems.

Invasive versus Conservative Treatment Approach among Older Adult Patients Admitted with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred treatment strategy for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI); however, its efficacy remains unclear in very older adult patients with STEMI.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center observational study included 530 patients aged >75 years admitted to Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center with a diagnosis of acute STEMI. Primary PCI was performed for patients with symptoms ≤12 hours in duration, while the other patients were conservatively treated. We evaluated 30-day mortality and complications occurring during hospitalization based on data from patient records.

RESULTS

Among the study patients, only 28/530 (5%) were conservatively treated. In-hospital complications, including the use of inotropes or intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation and the need for mechanical ventilation, did not differ significantly between the groups. The only parameter that showed a trend toward significance was the incidence of heart failure during hospitalization (p=0.042). The risk for 30-day mortality was substantially higher in the conservative treatment group than in the invasive treatment group (27% vs. 10%; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggested that despite concerns regarding the safety of the primary PCI strategy in the older adult STEMI population, this treatment strategy was associated with a survival benefit.

Age Considerations in the Invasive Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes

The elderly constitute a major proportion of patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the US. Due to pre-existing comorbidities, frailty, and increased risk of complications from medical and invasive therapies, management of ACS in the elderly population poses challenges. In patients with ST-elevation MI, urgent revascularization with primary percutaneous coronary intervention remains the standard of care irrespective of age. However, an early invasive approach in elderly patients with non-ST-elevation MI is based on individual evaluation of risks versus benefits. In this review, the authors discuss the unique characteristics of elderly patients presenting with ACS, specific geriatric conditions that need to be considered while making treatment decisions in these situations, and available evidence, current guidelines, and future directions for invasive management of elderly patients with ACS.

Early prognostic stratification and identification of irreversibly shocked patients despite primary percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Despite prognostic improvements in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), patients presenting with cardiogenic shock (CS) have still high mortality. Which are the relevant early prognostic factors despite revascularization in this high-risk population is poorly investigated.

METHODS

We analyzed STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and enrolled at the University Hospital of Trieste between 2012 and 2018. A decision tree based on data available at first medical contact (FMC) was built to stratify patients for 30-day mortality. Multivariate analysis was used to explore independent factors associated with 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Among 1222 STEMI patients consecutively enrolled, 7.5% presented with CS. CS compared with no-CS patients had worse 30-day mortality (33% vs 3%, P < 0.01). Considering data available at FMC, CS patients with a combination of age ≥76 years, anterior STEMI and an expected ischemia time > 3 h and 21 min were at the highest mortality risk, with a 30-day mortality of 85.7%. In CS, age (OR 1.246; 95% CI 1.045-1,141; P = 0.003), final TIMI flow 2-3 (OR 0.058; 95% CI 0.004-0.785; P = 0.032) and Ischemia Time (OR = 1.269; 95% CI 1.001-1.609; P = 0.049) were independently associated with 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In a contemporary real-world population presenting with CS due to STEMI, age is a relevant negative factor whereas an early and successful PCI is positively correlated with survival. However, a subgroup of elderly patients had severe prognosis despite revascularization. Whether pPCI may have an impact on survival in a very limited number of irreversibly critically ill patients remains uncertain and the identification of irreversibly shocked patients remains nowadays challenging.

The use of reperfusion therapy in transition countries without fully applicable pharmacoinvasive strategy

Background/Aim. The pharmacoinvasive (PI) therapy is a recommended strategy in patients (pts) with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) unable to undergo timely primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI). The aim of the study was to find out the cohorts of pts who are not treated by any reperfusion therapy (RT) as well to determine the outcome of the pts treated with RT in a transition country without fully applicable PI therapy. Methods. The study analyzed data from the Hospital National Registry for Acute Coronary Syndrome of Serbia (HORACS). Results. The significant predictors of the withdrawing of the application of any RT in the model [c 75.6%, SE 0.004, 95% CI 0.748?0.761)] were a ge ( ? 6 5 years), heart failure (Killip II-IV), diabetes mellitus, and the time to first medical contact (FMC) (> 360 min). In patients without RT, mortality was 15.7%, in pts treated with fibrinolytic therapy (FT) was 10.5%, and in pts treated with pPCI, it was 6.2% (p < 0.000). Within 3 hours to FMC, higher in-hospital mortality was in FT pts (FT 8.7% vs p-PCI 4.3%). FT treated patients were older, had more comorbidities and heart failure (HF). However, after propensity score matching, in order to ad-just the differences among the pts, the mortality rate remained higher in FT pts but not statistically significantly higher than in p-PCI pts (FT 8.8% vs p-PCI 6.4%). Conclusion. The balance of the best cost-benefit strategies for better use of RT is difficult to achieve in transition countries. The possibility for timely p-PCI and PI therapy is especially not applicable in high-risk patients, older pts, pts with HF, and those with diabetes mellitus.

Impact of thrombus aspiration in frail STEMI patients

BACKGROUND

Despite primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is generally considered the best therapy in older frail adults with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), the incidence of re-hospitalization for cardiovascular diseases remains significant in these patients.

AIMS

We hypothesized that thrombus aspiration (TA) before PPCI could be a useful treatment for reducing mortality and rehospitalizations in frail patients undergoing PPCI for STEMI.

METHODS

We conducted a study comparing PPCI alone vs TA + PPCI in frail STEMI patients. We examined a cohort of consecutive frail patients aged ≥ 65 years with first STEMI treated with PPCI between February 2008 and July 2015 at the Department of Cardiology of the "Cardarelli" Hospital in Naples, Italy.

RESULTS

The study was completed by 389 patients (PPCI: 195, TA + PPCI: 194). At 1-month follow-up, the rate of death from any cause was 7.0% in patients treated with PPCI alone vs 3.0% in patients treated with TA + PPCI (p 0.036), whereas death from cardiovascular causes was 6.0% in the PPCI group vs 3.0% in the TA + PPCI group (p 0.028). Equally important, the rate of re-hospitalization due to heart failure was 7.5% in the PPCI group vs 4.0% in TA + PPCI group (p 0.025) and the rate of re-hospitalization due to acute coronary syndrome was 10.0% in the PPCI group vs 4.5% in the TA + PPCI group (p 0.016).

CONCLUSION

These results indicate the importance of TA in the treatment of STEMI in a group of high-risk patients such as elderly with frailty.

Sarcopenia-derived exosomal micro-RNA 16-5p disturbs cardio-repair via a pro-apoptotic mechanism in myocardial infarction in mice

Sarcopenia is a pathophysiological malfunction induced by skeletal muscle atrophy. Several studies reported an association between sarcopenia-induced cardiac cachexia and poor prognosis in heart disease. However, due to lack of an established animal models, the underlying mechanism of disturbed cardiac repair accompanied with sarcopenia remains poorly understood. Here, we developed a novel sarcopenia-induced cardiac repair disturbance mouse model induced by tail suspension (TS) after cardiac ischemia and reperfusion (I/R). Importantly, we identified a specific exosomal-microRNA marker, miR-16-5p, in the circulating exosomes of I/R-TS mice. Of note, sarcopenia after I/R disturbed cardiac repair and raised the level of circulating-exosomal-miR-16-5p secreting from both the atrophic limbs and heart of TS mice. Likewise, miR-16-5p mimic plasmid disturbed cardiac repair in I/R mice directly. Additionally, in neonatal rat ventricular myocytes (NRVMs) cultured in vitro under hypoxic conditions in the presence of a miR-16-5p mimic, we observed increased apoptosis through p53 and Caspase3 upregulation, and also clarified that autophagosomes were decreased in NRVMs via SESN1 transcript interference-mediated mTOR activation. In conclusion, we show the pro-apoptotic effect of sarcopenia-derived miR-16-5p, which may be behind the exacerbation of myocardial infarction. Therefore, miR-16-5p can be a novel therapeutic target in the context of cardiac repair disturbances in sarcopenia-cachexia.

Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Older Patient

Coronary artery disease is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality, and its prevalence increases with age. The growing number of older patients and their differential characteristics make its management a challenge in clinical practice. The aim of this review is to summarize the state-of-the-art in diagnosis and treatment of acute coronary syndromes in this subgroup of patients. This comprises peculiarities of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) management, updated evidence of non-STEMI therapeutic strategies, individualization of antiplatelet treatment (weighting ischemic and hemorrhagic risks), as well as assessment of geriatric conditions and ethical issues in decision making.

Development of a machine learning model to predict the risk of late cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Background

The in-hospital mortality of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) increases to more than 50% following a cardiogenic shock (CS) event. This study highlights the need to consider the risk of delayed calculation in developing in-hospital CS risk models. This report compared the performances of multiple machine learning models and established a late-CS risk nomogram for STEMI patients.

Methods

This study used logistic regression (LR) models, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), support vector regression (SVM), and tree-based ensemble machine learning models [light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)] to predict CS risk in STEMI patients. The models were developed based on 1,598 and 684 STEMI patients in the training and test datasets, respectively. The models were compared based on accuracy, the area under the curve (AUC), recall, precision, and Gini score, and the optimal model was used to develop a late CS risk nomogram. Discrimination, calibration, and the clinical usefulness of the predictive model were assessed using C-index, calibration plotd, and decision curve analyses.

Results

A total of 2282 STEMI patients recruited between January 1, 2016 and May 31, 2020, were included in the complete dataset. The linear models built using LASSO and LR showed the highest overall predictive power, with an average accuracy over 0.93 and an AUC above 0.82. With a C-index of 0.811 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.769-0.853], the LASSO nomogram showed good differentiation and proper calibration. In internal validation tests, a high C-index value of 0.821 was achieved. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve (CIC) examination showed that compared with the previous score-based models, the LASSO model showed superior clinical relevance.

Conclusions

In this study, five machine learning methods were developed for in-hospital CS prediction. The LASSO model showed the best predictive performance. This nomogram could provide an accurate prognostic prediction for CS risk in patients with STEMI.

Management of acute coronary syndromes in older adults

Older patients are underrepresented in prospective studies and randomized clinical trials of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Over the last decade, a few specific trials have been conducted in this population, allowing more evidence-based management. Older adults are a heterogeneous, complex, and high-risk group whose management requires a multidimensional clinical approach beyond coronary anatomic variables. This review focuses on available data informing evidence-based interventional and pharmacological approaches for older adults with ACS, including guideline-directed management. Overall, an invasive approach appears to demonstrate a better benefit-risk ratio compared to a conservative one across the ACS spectrum, even considering patients' clinical complexity and multiple comorbidities. Conversely, more powerful strategies of antithrombotic therapy for secondary prevention have been associated with increased bleeding events and no benefit in terms of mortality reduction. An interdisciplinary evaluation with geriatric assessment should always be considered to achieve a holistic approach and optimize any treatment on the basis of the underlying biological vulnerability.

Chest pain and acute coronary syndrome in octogenarians admitted to the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

Although chest pain and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are among the most common complaints in the Emergency Departments (ED), little is known about this topic in the octogenarian population.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to describe the clinical presentation and to evaluate survival time according to the ACS type in a group of 80-year-old or over patients admitted for chest pain to an ED.

METHODS

Patients were classified according to the discharge diagnosis. A multivariable Cox regression analysis was done to assess the association between ACS type and mortality with the non-ACS chest pain group as the reference category.

RESULTS

ACS was diagnosed in 170 of the 391 patients analyzed and 51% of ACS patients were female. Within the ACS patients, 18.8% presented STEMI, 57% NSTEMI, and 24% unstable angina (UA). Most of the patients were treated conservatively. In the adjusted analysis, the incidence of death at 40 months of follow-up was higher in patients with STEMI (HR 3.24; CI 1.59-6.56) than NSTEMI (HR 2.53; CI 1.56-4.11). There was no difference between patients with UA and the non-ACS group (HR 0.64; CI 0.26-1.58), and myocardial revascularization was associated with reduced mortality risk (HR 0.45; CI 0.22-0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

A high prevalence of ACS was found among octogenarians admitted to the ED with chest pain, and the ACS type behaved as an independent predictor of mortality. Patients with UA diagnosis had a similar prognosis to patients with non-ACS chest pain, but this needs to be demonstrated by a prospective study.

Effectiveness and safety of antithrombotic strategies in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients represent a rapidly growing part of the population more susceptible to acute coronary syndromes and their complications. However, literature evidence is lacking in this clinical setting.

AIM

To describe the clinical features, in-hospital management and outcomes of “elderly” patients with myocardial infarction treated with antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation therapy.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients older than 80 years admitted to the Division of Cardiology of St. Andrea Hospital of Vercelli from January 2018 to December 2018 due to ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Clinical and laboratory data were collected for each patient, as well as the prevalence of previous or in-hospital atrial fibrillation (AF). In-hospital management, consisting of an invasive or conservative strategy, and the anti-thrombotic therapy used are described. Outcomes evaluated at 1 year follow-up included an efficacy ischemic endpoint and a safety bleeding endpoint.

RESULTS

Of the 105 patients enrolled (mean age 83.9 ± 3.6 years, 52.3% males), 68 (64.8%) were admitted due to NSTEMI and 37 (35.2%) due to STEMI. Among the STEMI patients, 34 (91.9%) underwent coronary angiography and all of them were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); among the NSTEMI patients, 42 (61.8%) were assigned to an invasive strategy and 16 (38.1%) of them underwent a PCI. No significant difference between the groups was found concerning the prevalence of previous or in-hospital de-novo AF. 10.5% of the whole population received triple antithrombotic therapy and 9.5% single antiplatelet therapy plus oral anticoagulation (OAC), with no significant difference between the subgroups, although a higher number of STEMI patients received dual antiplatelet therapy without OAC as compared with NSTEMI patients. A low rate of in-hospital death (5.7%) and 1-year cardiovascular death (3.3%) was registered. Seven (7.8%) patients experienced major adverse cardiovascular events, while the rate of minor and major bleeding at 1-year follow-up was 10% and 2.2%, respectively, with no difference between NSTEMI and STEMI patients.

CONCLUSION

In this real-world study, a tailored evaluation of an invasive strategy and antithrombotic therapy resulted in a low rate of adverse events in elderly patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction.

Clinical Differences of Recent Myocardial Infarction Compared With Acute Myocardial Infarction - Insights From the Tokyo CCU Network Multicenter Registry

BACKGROUND

Characteristics and treatment outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients have been studied; however, those of recent myocardial infarction (RMI) patients remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify characteristics, treatment strategy, and in-hospital outcomes of RMI patients in the Tokyo CCU network database.Methods and Results:In total, 1,853 RMI and 12,494 AMI patients from the Tokyo CCU network database during 2013-2016 were compared. Both RMI and AMI were redefined by onset times of 2-28 days and ≤24 h, respectively. The RMI group had a higher average age (70.4±12.9 vs. 68.0±13.4 years, P<0.001), more women (27.6% vs. 23.6%, P<0.001), lower proportion of patients with chest pain as the chief complaint (75.2% vs. 83.6%, P<0.001), higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (35.9% vs. 31.0%, P<0.001), and higher mechanical complication incidence (3.0% vs. 1.5%, P<0.001) than did the AMI group. Thirty-day mortality was comparable (5.3% vs. 5.8%, P=0.360); major causes of death were cardiogenic shock and mechanical complications in the AMI and RMI groups, respectively. Death from mechanical complications (not onset time) in the AMI group plateaued almost 1 week after hospitalization, whereas it continued to increase in the RMI group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both RMI and AMI patients have distinctive clinical features, sequelae, and causes of death. Although treatment of RMI patients adhered to guidelines, it was insufficient, and death from mechanical complications continues to increase.

Early mobilization post-myocardial infarction: A scoping review

Bedrest and immobilization following a myocardial infarction (MI) can lead to functional impairment that can persist following hospitalization. Early mobilization (EM) is associated with good functional and clinical outcomes in critical care, medical and surgical settings. However, the impact and current role of EM in post-MI care has not been well-defined. Our objective was to assess the evidence for post-MI mobilization, define current post-MI mobilization practice, and understand perspectives of cardiovascular professionals toward mobilization. A scoping review related to "early mobilization" and "myocardial infarction" was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Methodology. Pubmed, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library and CINAHL databases were included. Results were categorized into six topic areas. There were 59 references included in the analysis. There was evidence for the effectiveness and safety of earlier mobilization in experimental studies of the pre-revascularization era, but there was a lack of strong evidence for EM in contemporary post-MI care. Mobilization appears to be safe following arterial catheterization and is associated with minimal hemodynamic and respiratory compromise. Most people are delayed in mobilizing post-MI and spend the majority of the initial hospitalization period lying in bed. Only 1 of 7 current major cardiovascular professional societies guidelines recommend EM post-MI. There were no studies exploring the perspectives of cardiovascular professionals toward mobilization. EM may be beneficial in the post-MI care. However, there is an evidence gap for the impact of EM post-MI in the contemporary literature. More robust evidence from randomized clinical trials is required to inform clinicians and influence practice.

Benefit of primary percutaneous coronary interventions in the elderly with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction

Objective

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (P-PCI) has demonstrated its efficacy in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, patients with STEMI ≥75 years receive less P-PCI than younger patients despite their higher in-hospital morbimortality. The objective of this analysis was to determine the effectiveness of P-PCI in patients with STEMI ≥75 years.

Methods

We included 979 patients with STEMI ≥75 years, from the ATención HOspitalaria del Síndrome coronario study, a registry of 8142 consecutive patients with acute coronary syndrome admitted at 31 Spanish hospitals in 2014–2016. We calculated a propensity score (PS) for the indication of P-PCI. Patients that received or not P-PCI were matched by PS. Using logistic regression, we compared the effectiveness of performing P-PCI versus non-performance for the composite primary event, which included death, reinfarction, acute pulmonary oedema or cardiogenic shock during hospitalisation.

Results

Of the included patients, 81.5 % received P-PCI. The matching provided two groups of 169 patients with and without P-PCI. Compared with its non-performance, P-PCI presented a composite event OR adjusted by PS of 0.55 (95% CI 0.34 to 0.89).

Conclusions

Receiving a P-PCI was significantly associated with a reduced risk of major intrahospital complications in patients with STEMI aged 75 years or older.

Challenges and Controversies in the Management of ACS in Elderly Patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Elderly patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) represent a challenging patient population. A high index of suspicion is needed for their diagnosis, as they are less likely to present with typical anginal symptoms compared to their younger counterparts.

RECENT FINDINGS

Disrupted coronary plaques with superimposed thrombosis are the predominant pathophysiology of ACS; however, an increased proportion of calcified nodules is encountered in elderly patients. Emergent reperfusion and revascularization remain the mainstay treatment for ST-elevation myocardial infarction or cardiogenic shock. In elderly patients with NSTE-ACS, a routine invasive strategy is generally superior to an ischemia-guided strategy, and the safety of an early invasive strategy has also been recently demonstrated. When treating elderly ACS patients with antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapies, close attention to co-morbidities, frailty and the balance of ischemia-bleeding risk should be undertaken, and medication doses should be carefully adjusted. Overall, elderly patients with ACS remain undertreated with evidence-based therapies, experience worse outcomes, and represent an opportunity for enhancing and mitigating healthcare disparities.

Effects of intracoronary injection of nicorandil and tirofiban on myocardial perfusion and short-term prognosis in elderly patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after emergency PCI

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the effects of the intracoronary injection of nicorandil and tirofiban on myocardial perfusion and short-term prognosis in elderly patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

Seventy-eight STEMI patients with age >65 years who underwent emergency PCI were consecutively enrolled. These patients received conventional PCI and were randomly divided into a control group and a treatment group (n=39 per group). The control group received an intracoronary injection of tirofiban followed by a maintenance infusion for 36 hours after surgery. The treatment group received intracoronary injection of tirofiban and nicorandil, and then intravenous infusion of tirofiban and nicorandil 36 hours after surgery. The following parameters were measured: TIMI grade, corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC), TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG), ST-segment resolution (STR) rate 2 hours post-operatively, resolution of ST-segment elevation (STR) at 2 hours postoperatively, peak level of serum CK-MB, left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 7-10 days postoperatively, and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in-hospital and within 30 days post-operatively.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, more patients in the treatment group had TIMI 3 and TMPG 3, and STR after PCI was significantly higher. The treatment group also had significantly lower cTFC, lower infarction relative artery (IRA), lower peak CK-MB, and no reflow ratio after PCI. The treatment group had significantly higher LVEDD and LVEF but lower incidence of MACEs than the control group.

CONCLUSION

The intracoronary injection of nicorandil combined with tirofiban can effectively improve myocardial reperfusion in elderly STEMI patients after emergency PCI and improve short-term prognoses.

Differences in the Selvester QRS score after primary PCI strategy and conservative treatment for STEMI patients with negative T waves

BACKGROUND

According to current guidelines, the main indications for PCI in patients with STEMI are ST-segment deviations and defined time from the onset of symptoms. Negative T wave at admission can be a sign of prolonged ischemia or spontaneous reperfusion. In both situations, the urgent intervention is questionable. We evaluated the infarct size and in-hospital mortality in STEMI patients with negative T wave in cases of primary PCI strategy compared with conservative treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 116 STEMI patients with negative T wave at the presenting ECG was performed. Sixty-eight patients (59%) underwent primary PCI strategy (PCI group), and 48 (41%) were treated conservatively (non-PCI group). The infarct size estimated by using the Selvester score, and in-hospital mortality were evaluated.

RESULTS

The difference between Selvester score values at admission and at discharge in the non-PCI group was statistically significant (1.48; 95% CI 0.694-2.27), while no significant difference was observed in the PCI group (-0.07; 95% CI -0.546-0.686). The in-hospital mortality was higher in the non-PCI group; however, the numbers were relatively small: PCI 2 (2.9%) and non-PCI 5 (10.4%).

CONCLUSION

In this study, we showed a reduction in the infarct size estimated by Selvester score in STEMI patients with negative T wave who were treated conservatively, while there was no significant change in the infarct size after primary PCI strategy. The higher mortality in patients treated conservatively could be attributed to higher age and comorbidities in the non-PCI group. It seems that conservative treatment strategy might be an option in STEMI patients with negative T wave.

[Demographic evolution, clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of older adults treated by primary angioplasty for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction]

BACKGROUND

The number of older adults treated for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is increasing. Nevertheless, their treatment might not be as optimal as younger adults. This study sought to evaluate demographic evolution, clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients of patients aged 75years-old or older treated by primary angioplasty for STEMI.

METHODS

Retrospective study of all consecutive patients for STEMI between January 2012 and December 2017. Their clinical, biologic, echocardiographic and angiographic data, as well as in-hospital outcomes were collected and compared between two groups: younger and older than 75 year-olds.

RESULTS

Five hundred and sixty-eight patients including 99 (17.4%) 75 year-old or older were included in the present study. Patients aged 75 or older had an increased delay of treatment between the time of the chest pain onset and revascularization (7.30±1,16 vs 4.77±0,36hours, P=0.0391), they were more frequently treated with clopidogrel rather than more potent anti P2Y12 antiplatelet therapies (55.6% vs 24.8%, P<0.0001) and received less frequently anti-GP2B3A therapy (44.8% vs 23.2%, P<0.0001). There was a trend for increased in-hospital mortality in the older group, despite non statistically significant (4.04% vs 1.5%, P=0.0847). Older adults had a worse clinical status with decreased post-STEMI left ventricular ejection fraction (44.42±1,38 vs 49.07±0,49, P=0,0019). They were also less treated with drug-eluting stents (51.5% vs 73.9%, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Adults aged 75 years-old or older represent a subsequent proportion of patients admitted for STEMI. They had a worse initial clinical presentation associated with worse prognostic, as compared to younger adults. They experience delayed reperfusion therapy and suboptimal treatment as compared to younger adults.

Primary Coronary Intervention in Octogenarians and Nonagenarians With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Canadian Single-Center Perspective

The proportion of individuals >80 years of age constitute an increasing proportion of patients who present with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The objective of this study is to evaluate in-hospital outcomes and 1-year survival of very elderly patients who present with an STEMI and undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Between 2009 and 2015, individuals >80 years of age (very elderly patients) with an STEMI presenting at a single tertiary Canadian care center were included in the study. A random sample of 100 individuals aged 65 to 69 years over the same time period were selected as a control group. A total of 284 patients were included in the study population including 100 controls, 164 octogenarians, and 20 nonagenarians. Of total, 1661 pPCIs occurred during this study period with the very elderly population (>80 years) comprising 11.1% of the total pPCIs. Compared with controls, individuals aged >80 are more likely to have a delay in treatment with increased rates of bleeding, acute kidney injury, rehospitalization, and a trend toward longer hospital stays following pPCI for STEMI. Although in-hospital and 1-year mortality were similar between both cohorts >80 years of age with STEMI, their overall survival was reduced compared with controls.

Management of myocardial infarction in the elderly. Insights from Spanish Minimum Basic Data Set

Background:

We aimed to assess the impact of implementation of reperfusion networks, the type of hospital and specialty of the treating physician on the management and outcomes of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients aged ⩾75 years.

Methods:

We analysed data from the Minimum Basic Data Set of the Spanish public health system, assessing hospital discharges between 2004 and 2013. Discharges were distributed in three groups depending on the clinical management: percutaneous coronary intervention, thrombolysis or no reperfusion. Primary outcome measure was all cause in-hospital mortality. For risk adjustment, patient comorbidities were identified for each index hospitalization.

Results:

We identified 299,929 discharges, of whom 107,890 (36%) were in-patients aged ⩾75 years. Older patients had higher prevalence of comorbidities, were less often treated in high complexity hospitals and were less frequently managed by cardiologists ( p<0.001). Both percutaneous coronary intervention and fibrinolysis were less often performed in elderly patients ( p<0.001). A progressive increase in the rate of percutaneous coronary intervention was observed in the elderly across the study period (from 17% in 2004 to 45% in 2013, p<0.001), with a progressive reduction of crude mortality (from 23% in 2004 to 19% in 2013, p<0.001). Adjusted analysis showed an association between being treated in high complexity hospitals, being treated by cardiologists and lower in-hospital mortality ( p <0.001).

Conclusions:

Elderly patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction are less often managed in high complexity hospitals and less often treated by cardiologists. Both factors are associated with higher in-hospital mortality.

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available on the outcome of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in octogenarian patients, as the elderly are under-represented in randomized trials. This study aims to provide insights on clinical characteristics, management and outcome of the elderly and very elderly presenting with STEMI.

METHODS

2225 STEMI patients ≥70years old (mean age 76.8±5.1years and 53.8% men) were admitted into the network of the ISACS-TC registry. Of these patients, 72.8% were ≥70 to 79years old (elderly) and 27.2% were ≥80years old (very-elderly). The primary end-point was 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Thirty-day mortality rates were 13.4% in the elderly and 23.9% in the very-elderly. Primary PCI decreased the unadjusted risk of death both in the elderly (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.24-0.43) and very-elderly patients (OR: 0.45, 95% CI 0.30-0.68), without significant difference between groups. In the very-elderly hypertension and Killip class ≥2 were the only independent factors associated with mortality; whereas in the elderly female gender, prior stroke, chronic kidney disease and Killip class ≥2 were all factors independently associated with mortality. Factors associated with the lack of use of reperfusion were female gender and atypical chest pain in the very-elderly and in the elderly; in the elderly, however, there were some more factors, namely: history of diabetes, current smoking, prior stroke, Killip class ≥2 and history chronic kidney disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Age is relevant in the prognosis of STEMI, but its importance should not be considered secondary to other major clinical factors. Primary PCI appears to have beneficial effects in the octogenarian STEMI patients.

Defining and validating comorbidities and procedures in ICD-10 health data in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients

Administrative health databases are used in research to define comorbid conditions, diagnosis, and procedures. Our objectives were to validate a diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and invasive cardiac procedure coding against a comprehensive registry of STEMI patients and determine an optimal algorithm for defining comorbidities using administrative hospitalization and ambulatory databases, but without using a physician claims database, which is unavailable for use in many jurisdictions.A registry of consecutive STEMI patients was used to define a reference cohort and linked to the hospitalization and ambulatory databases. Four administrative case definitions for defining comorbidities, as well as STEMI diagnosis and in-hospital procedures using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) and the Canadian Classification of Health Interventions (CCI) were evaluated. Metrics were used to evaluate algorithm performance and compare discriminative ability using the C statistic.The 3236 patients had median age of 60 years (interquartile range 52-71) and 75.7% were male. A diagnosis of STEMI was correctly identified in the administrative records for 3043 (94.0%) patients. In-hospital procedures (coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary intervention, and angiogram) were well identified using administrative definitions (Kappa statistic 0.83-1.00). Validation of comorbidities varied by condition but an algorithm using 2 inpatient/ambulatory visits in the previous 2 years maximized PPV, ranging from 28.6% for previous heart failure to 95.7% for previous MI. The c statistic was similar for each of the methods, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80.ICD-10 and CCI codes can identify hospitalized STEMI patients with high sensitivity and accurately define in-hospital cardiac procedures. Comorbidities can be defined with high PPV using a definition of 2 inpatient/ambulatory visits in the previous 2 years.

Evaluating clinical reason and rationale for not delivering reperfusion therapy in ST elevation myocardial infarction patients: Insights from a comprehensive cohort

BACKGROUND

In ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), reperfusion therapy is lifesaving but is not delivered in approximately one quarter of patients. To address this care gap, we reviewed all STEMI patients that did not receive reperfusion to identify patient characteristics, in-hospital outcomes and the clinical reason or rationale for withholding reperfusion therapy.

METHODS

A prospective chart review identified a consecutive cohort of STEMI patients over one-year within a defined health care region with independent data abstraction. Subsequently a trained nurse completed retrospective chart review and categorized patients by rationale for failure to receive reperfusion.

RESULTS

Of 745 STEMI patients, 181 (24.3%) did not receive reperfusion. Compared to those receiving reperfusion, they were older (67.5 vs. 58.0years, p=0.001) with more comorbidities and higher in-hospital mortality (15.5% vs. 3.5% p=<0.0001). After excluding 35 patients (unavailable data) there were 146 STEMI patients for qualitative determination. Patient delay greater than 12hours from symptom onset accounted for the majority of patients (56/146, 38.4%). In 19.9% (29/146), conservative medical management with documented rationale occurred. Following angiography, primary PCI was attempted but was unsuccessful or no culprit lesion identified in 19.2% (28/146). The diagnosis of STEMI was missed or no rationale for failure to deliver therapy identified in 8.2% (12/146). Death prior to planned reperfusion occurred in 8 (8/146, 5.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Legitimate rationale exists for the majority of STEMI patients not receiving reperfusion. Ultimately, only 1.6% (12/745) of consecutive STEMI patients failed to receive reperfusion without documented rationale or due to missed diagnosis.