Invasive vs. conservative management of older patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: individual patient data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Older patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) are less likely to receive guideline-recommended care including coronary angiography and revascularization. Evidence-based recommendations regarding interventional management strategies in this patient cohort are scarce. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of routine invasive vs. conservative management of NSTEACS by using individual patient data (IPD) from all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including older patients.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Web of Science and Scopus were searched between 1 January 2010 and 11 September 2023. RCTs investigating routine invasive and conservative strategies in persons >70 years old with NSTEACS were included. Observational studies or trials involving populations outside the target range were excluded. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction (MI) at 1 year. One-stage IPD meta-analyses were adopted by use of random-effects and fixed-effect Cox models. This meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023379819).

RESULTS

Six eligible studies were identified including 1479 participants. The primary endpoint occurred in 181 of 736 (24.5%) participants in the invasive management group compared with 215 of 743 (28.9%) participants in the conservative management group with a hazard ratio (HR) from random-effects model of 0.87 (95% CI 0.63-1.22; P = .43). The hazard for MI at 1 year was significantly lower in the invasive group compared with the conservative group (HR from random-effects model 0.62, 95% CI 0.44-0.87; P = .006). Similar results were seen for urgent revascularization (HR from random-effects model 0.41, 95% CI 0.18-0.95; P = .037). There was no significant difference in mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

No evidence was found that routine invasive treatment for NSTEACS in older patients reduces the risk of a composite of all-cause mortality and MI within 1 year compared with conservative management. However, there is convincing evidence that invasive treatment significantly lowers the risk of repeat MI or urgent revascularisation. Further evidence is needed from ongoing larger clinical trials.

Clopidogrel induced reduction in neutrophil count: An overlooked beneficial effect?

Complement-stimulated neutrophils are able to adhere to the endothelium and damage endothelial cells both in vitro and in vivo. These blood cells participate in the early stages, growth and complications of atherosclerotic plaques. Recent findings, based on mendelian randomization analysis, support the concept that high neutrophil counts are a causal risk factor for ischemic heart disease and myocardial infarction . Clopidogrel decreases leukocyte count and inflammatory markers in patients with acute coronary syndromes; this off-target effect, which is independent of the antiplatelet action, may help explaining secondary prevention data showing a superiority of clopidogrel over aspirin in reducing new cardiovascular events.

Impact of age on the predictive value of NT-proBNP in patients with diabetes mellitus stabilised after an acute coronary syndrome

AIMS

To assess the impact of age on the prognostic value of NT-proBNP concentration in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) stabilised after an Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

The AleCardio study compared aleglitazar with placebo in 7226 patients with T2DM and recent ACS. Patients with heart failure were excluded. Median follow-up was 104 weeks. Baseline NT-proBNP plasma concentration was measured centrally. Multivariable Cox regression was used to determine the mortality predictive information provided by NT-proBNP across age groups.

RESULTS

Median age was 61y (IQR 54, 67). NT-proBNP concentration increased by quartile (Q) of age (median 264, 318, 391, and 588 pg/ml). Compared to Q1, patients in Q4 of NT-proBNP had higher (p < 0.001) adjusted HR for all-cause (aHR 6.9; 95 % CI 4.0-12) and cardiovascular (11; 5.4-23) death. Within each age Q, baseline NT-proBNP in patients who died was 3 times higher than in survivors (all p < 0.001). When age and NT-proBNP levels were modeled as continuous variables, their interaction term was nonsignificant. The relative prognostic information provided by NT-proBNP (percent of total X2) increased from 38 % in age Q1 to 75 % in age Q4 for mortality, and from 50 % to 88 % for CV death.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with T2DM stabilised after an ACS, NT-proBNP level predicts death irrespective of age.

Two Myocardial Infarctions and Five 8,000-m Peaks

We report the case of a male smoker who is overweight and has no leisure time physical activity until a first acute inferolateral myocardial infarction at the age of 44 years, which was treated using coronary stenting of the left circumflex artery. He was discharged with an ejection fraction of 0.45 and the indication to quit smoking and initiate regular aerobic physical activity. After that episode, he started regular mountain hiking in the Alps, Andes, and, finally, in the Himalayas and Karakorum, where, up to the age of 65 years, he climbed 5 peaks of altitude >8,000 m, always solo and without oxygen, despite a recurrent myocardial infarction because of occlusion at the distal edge of the previously implanted stent. This case supports the indication that high-altitude per se is not contraindicated in patients with well-compensated coronary artery disease, even after an acute MI.

Hospital-Acquired Anemia in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Epidemiology and Potential Impact on Long-Term Outcome

BACKGROUND

Anemia (either pre-existing or hospital-acquired) is considered an independent predictor of mortality in acute coronary syndromes. However, it is still not clear whether anemia should be considered as a marker of worse health status or a therapeutic target. We sought to investigate the relationship between hospital-acquired anemia and clinical and laboratory findings and to assess the association with mortality and major cardiovascular events at long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Patients consecutively admitted at Niguarda Hospital between February 2014 and November 2020 for an acute coronary syndrome were included in this cohort analysis and classified as anemic at admission (group A), with normal hemoglobin at admission but developing anemia during hospitalization (hospital-acquired anemia) (group B); and with normal hemoglobin levels throughout admission (group C).

RESULTS

Among 1294 patients included, group A included 353 (27%) patients, group B 468 (36%), and group C 473 patients (37%). In terms of cardiovascular burden and incidence of death, major cardiovascular events and bleeding at 4.9-year median follow-up, group B had an intermediate risk profile as compared with A and C. Baseline anemia was an independent predictor of death (hazard ratio 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-2.25; P = .04) along with frailty, Charlson comorbidity Index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, previous myocardial infarction, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Conversely, hospital-acquired anemia was not associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-1.75; P = .4).

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital-acquired anemia affects one-third of patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome and is associated with age, frailty, and comorbidity burden, but was not found to be an independent predictor of long-term mortality.

SARS-CoV-2 Positivity, Stent Thrombosis, and 30-day Mortality in STEMI Patients Undergoing Mechanical Reperfusion

SARS-Cov-2 has been suggested to promote thrombotic complications and higher mortality. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of SARS-CoV-2 positivity on in-hospital outcome and 30-day mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) enrolled in the International Survey on Acute Coronary Syndromes ST-segment elevation Myocardial Infarction (ISACS-STEMI COVID-19 registry. The 109 SARS-CoV-2 positive patients were compared with 2005 SARS-CoV-2 negative patients. Positive patients were older (P = .002), less often active smokers (P = .002), and hypercholesterolemic (P = .006), they presented more often later than 12 h (P = .037), more often to the hub and were more often in cardiogenic shock (P = .02), or requiring rescue percutaneous coronary intervention after failed thrombolysis (P < .0001). Lower postprocedural Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 3 flow (P = .029) and more thrombectomy (P = .046) were observed. SARS-CoV-2 was associated with a significantly higher in-hospital mortality (25.7 vs 7%, adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) [95% Confidence Interval] = 3.2 [1.71-5.99], P < .001) in-hospital definite in-stent thrombosis (6.4 vs 1.1%, adjusted Odds Ratio [95% CI] = 6.26 [2.41-16.25], P < .001) and 30-day mortality (34.4 vs 8.5%, adjusted Hazard Ratio [95% CI] = 2.16 [1.45-3.23], P < .001), confirming that SARS-CoV-2 positivity is associated with impaired reperfusion, with negative prognostic consequences.

[The heart patient at high altitude: not just thin air]

The exposure to high altitude, with its inherent hypobaric hypoxia, elicits transient compensatory physiological responses of the cardiovascular and respiratory system which, however, do not preclude a safe sojourn at least up to 3500 m to the vast majority of well compensated patients with heart disease on stable drug therapy. Existing scientific statements of the European and American Societies of Cardiovascular and High-Mountain Medicine have released specific and helpful recommendations, though mostly based on expert consensus rather than solid evidence. The risk of cardiac events has been recorded only during sports activities, does not seem to depend on altitude and is similar to what is observed during intense exercise at sea level. Besides altitude itself, other aspects of the mountain environment should be considered, such as lower temperature, wind and dehydration which all require careful planning and equipment typical of the alpine sports. The distance of most mountain areas from medical centers able to provide effective care in time-dependent emergencies, and the lack in most cases of dedicated protocols, should also be considered as an important, most likely the most important limiting factor in high-risk patients.

In-hospital outcomes in nonagenarian patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present analysis was to evaluate the incidence and predictors of in-hospital adverse outcomes in nonagenarian patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

METHODS

Consecutive nonagenarian patients undergoing pPCI for STEMI from 2009 to 2019 were retrospectively included in an international multicenter registry. In-hospital all-cause death was the primary outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 308 patients were included (mean age 92.5±2.5 years, 65.6% female). Mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) at hospital admission was 130.7±33.5 mmHg, 46 (17%) patients presented with a Killip class III-IV, mean left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) was 40.0±11.5% and 147 (58%) patients were independent in everyday activities. In-hospital death occurred in 99 patients (32%). After multivariate adjustment, lower LVEF (OR per unit reduction 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03-1.11, P value <0.001), lower SBP (OR 1.02 per mmHg reduction, 95% CI: 1.01-1.03, P value 0.001) and being not independent at home (OR 2.56, 95% CI: 1.25-5.26, P value 0.01) resulted independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. A sensitivity analysis performed in final TIMI 3 flow population confirmed the prognostic role of LVEF and independency on in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonagenarian patients presenting with STEMI and undergoing pPCI have high in-hospital mortality. Independency in everyday life is a strong independent predictor of survival to hospital discharge.

Prognostic Impact of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Older Patients Hospitalized with Acute Myocardial Infarction: Real-World Findings from the Lombardy Health Database

BACKGROUND

Older patients are less likely to receive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) compared to younger patients. We investigated the prognostic impact of PCI in a large population of patients hospitalized with AMI in the period 2003-2018 by using the administrative Lombardy Health Database (Italy).

METHODS

We considered all patients aged ≥75 years hospitalized with AMI (either STEMI or NSTEMI) from 2003 to 2018 in Lombardy. Patients were grouped according to whether they were treated or not with PCI during the index hospitalization. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary endpoints were 1-year mortality and 1-year re-hospitalization for acute heart failure (AHF) or AMI.

RESULTS

116,063 patients aged ≥75 years (mean age 83 ± 6; 48% males; 46% STEMI) were hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of AMI. Thirty-seven percent of them (n = 42,912) underwent PCI. The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly lower in PCI-treated patients (6% vs. 15%; p < 0.0001). One-year mortality and 1-year re-hospitalization for AHF/AMI were less frequent in PCI-treated patients (16% vs. 41% and 15% vs. 21%, respectively; p < 0.0001). The adjusted risks of the study endpoints were lower in PCI-treated patients: OR 0.37 (95% CI 0.36-0.39) for in-hospital mortality; HR 0.37 (95% CI 0.36-0.38) for 1-year mortality; HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.71-0.77) for 1-year re-hospitalization for AHF/AMI. Similar results were found in STEMI and NSTEMI patients considered separately.

CONCLUSIONS

Our real-world data showed that in patients with AMI ≥ 75 years of age, PCI use is associated with lower in-hospital and 1-year mortality.

[The fact about e-cigarettes and cardiovascular risk]

Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are battery-powered devices containing a liquid based on propylene glycol or vegetable glycerin. These compounds, when vaporized, act as a vehicle for nicotine, flavors, and other chemical components. These devices have been marketed without clear evidence of risks, long-term safety, and efficacy. Toxicological data show lower plasma concentrations of carbon monoxide and other cancer-inducing substances as compared to traditional smoking. However, several studies have highlighted an increase in sympathetic tone, vascular stiffness, and endothelial dysfunction, all factors associated with cardiovascular risk that, however, is largely inferior to the cardiovascular risk related to traditional smoking. Recent clinical studies have shown how the use of e-cigarettes, combined with adequate psychological support, can be effective in reducing traditional smoking but not nicotine addiction. New policy directives are focusing on the possibility to ban some deleterious products in favor of the use of low-nicotine devices able to promote smoking cessation and reducing the risk of addiction, especially in young people. The use of e-cigarettes among smokers might be promoted with the specific aim of facilitating smoke cessation, but non-smokers and adolescents should be warned against using such devices. Finally, particular attention should be paid to smokers so that the combined use of electronic and traditional cigarettes can be limited as much as possible.

Antiplatelet Strategies for Older Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: Finding Directions in a Low-Evidence Field

Patients ≥ 75 years of age account for about one third of hospitalizations for acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Since the latest European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend that older ACS patients use the same diagnostic and interventional strategies used by the younger ones, most elderly patients are currently treated invasively. Therefore, an appropriate dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is indicated as part of the secondary prevention strategy to be implemented in such patients. The choice of the composition and duration of DAPT should be tailored on an individual basis, after careful assessment of the thrombotic and bleeding risk of each patient. Advanced age is a main risk factor for bleeding. Recent data show that in patients of high bleeding risk short DAPT (1 to 3 months) is associated with decreased bleeding complications and similar thrombotic events, as compared to standard 12-month DAPT. Clopidogrel seems the preferable P2Y12 inhibitor, due to a better safety profile than ticagrelor. When the bleeding risk is associated with a high thrombotic risk (a circumstance present in about two thirds of older ACS patients) it is important to tailor the treatment by taking into account the fact that the thrombotic risk is high during the first months after the index event and then wanes gradually over time, whereas the bleeding risk remains constant. Under these circumstances, a de-escalation strategy seems reasonable, starting with DAPT that includes aspirin and low-dose prasugrel (a more potent and reliable P2Y12 inhibitor than clopidogrel) then switching after 2-3 months to DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel for up to 12 months.

Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome in chronic kidney disease: prognostic implication of an early invasive strategy

BACKGROUND

The optimal timing of PCI for NSTE-ACS with CKD is unclear. The aim of our study was to assess whether early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (within 24 hours from admission) is associated with improved in-hospital (mortality or acute kidney injury) and long-term events (composite of mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke and bleeding events) in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

We retrospectively studied NSTE-ACS patients who underwent PCI in large tertiary centers. CKD was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)<60 mL/min/1.73 m². A propensity score for the likelihood of an early invasive strategy was calculated. Relative risks (RR) and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were estimated for in-hospital and follow-up events.

RESULTS

We included 821 patients, mean age was 69±12 years; 492 (60%) received an early PCI, and 273 (33%) had an eGFR <60. Median follow-up was 391 days. At univariate analysis, early treatment was associated with significantly lower in-hospital and follow-up events. However, after adjustment for major prognostic factors, there was no significant association with both in-hospital (RR=1.06; 95% CI 0.83-1.36) and follow-up events (RR=1.07; 95% CI 0.83-1.37). When the association was assessed in strata of CKD, lack of statistically significant association was confirmed, even if a trend emerged in patients with preserved renal function both on primary outcome (RR=0.47, 95% 0.18-1.22) and time to secondary outcome (HR=0.62, 95% CI 0.36-1.08).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion in a cohort of NSTE-ACS patients, an early invasive strategy does not independently affect prognosis.

Tailoring oral antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes: from guidelines to clinical practice

The assessment of bleeding and ischemic risk is a crucial step in establishing appropriate composition and duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with percutaneous coronary angioplasty. Evidence from recent randomized clinical trials led to some paradigm shifts in current guidelines recommendations. Options alternative to the standard 12-month DAPT duration include shorter periods of DAPT followed by single antiplatelet treatment with either aspirin or P2Y12 monotherapy, guided or unguided de-escalation DAPT, prolonged DAPT beyond the 12-month treatment period. Although DAPT composition and duration should be selected for each ACS patient on an individual basis weighing clinical and procedural variables, data from latest trials and meta-analyses may permit suggesting the most appropriate DAPT strategy according to the ischemic and bleeding risk assessed using validated tools and scores.

Acute, Prolonged, and Extensive Myocardial Ischemia in a Patient With Colorectal Cancer

This case report describes a patient in their 60s with spontaneously subsiding and reoccurring severe acute chest pain that lasted for about 30 minutes as well as a recent diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

602 CRITICAL AORTIC STENOSIS IN PROFOUND CARDIOGENIC SHOCH: BRIDGE TO TAVI WITH LEVOSIMENDAN

Cardiogenic shock (CS) in severe aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with high mortality. Percutaneous aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a possible definite solution, but generally it cannot be performed on an emergency base. In patients with severe systolic dysfunction an augmentation of cardiac index (CI) during dobutamine and nitroprusside infusion can demonstrate contractile and afterload reserve. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring is necessary to keep optimal filling pressure and verify arterial pressure stability. If the hemodynamic response is positive we administer levosimendan to bridge the patient to decision and/or to TAVI. In our small experience this strategy is efficacy and well tolerated.

Impact of hemoglobin levels at admission on outcomes among elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with low-dose Prasugrel or clopidogrel: A sub-study of the ELDERLY ACS 2 trial

Hemoglobin (Hb) levels have emerged as a useful tool for risk stratification and the prediction of outcome after myocardial infarction. We aimed at evaluating the prognostic impact of this parameter among patients in advanced age, where the larger prevalence of anemia and the higher rate of comorbidities could directly impact on the cardiovascular risk.

METHODS

All the patients in the ELDERLY-2 trial, were included in this analysis and stratified according to the values of hemoglobin at admission. The primary endpoint of this study was cardiovascular mortality within one year. The secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality, MI, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2-3 or 5 bleeding, any stroke, re-hospitalization for cardiovascular event or stent thrombosis (probable or definite) within 12 months after index admission.

RESULTS

We included in our analysis 1364 patients, divided in quartiles of Hb values (&lt;12.2; 12.2-13.39; 13.44-14.49; ≥ 4.5 g/dl). At a mean follow- up of 330.4 ± 99.9 days cardiovascular mortality was increased in patients with lower Hb (HR[95%CI] = 0.76 [0.59-0.97], p = 0.03). Results were no more significant after correction for baseline differences (adjusted HR[95%CI] = 1.22 [0.41-3.6], p = 0.16). Similar results were observed for overall mortality. At subgroup analysis, (according to Hb median values) a significant interaction was observed only with the type of antiplatelet therapy, but not with major high-risk subsets of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Among elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome managed invasively, lower hemoglobin at admission is associated with higher cardiovascular and all-cause mortality and major ischemic events, mainly explained by the higher risk profile.

758 CASE REPORT OF A CATHETER-RELATED THROMBOSIS IN THE RIGHT HEART

Introduction

Central venous catheters (CVCs) are commonly used in clinical practice. Their use may be associated to complications like catheter-related thrombosis, that may not only result in vascular and catheter occlusion but also infection, pulmonary embolism, and formation of right heart thromboemboli. Patients who develop catheter-related thrombosis have an increased risk of mortality due to the potential risk of embolization to the pulmonary vasculature.

Case presentation

We describe the case of a 76-year-old man with multiple cardiovascular risk factors, admitted to the Nephrology Department for a suspected UTI. The patient develops a central venous catheter-related thrombosis on the CVC placed in the right jugular vein. The finding of the thrombus was accidental and happened during a transthoracic echocardiography performed to exclude endocarditis. The thrombus was successfully treated with LMWH infusion, preventing complications like pulmonary embolism.

Conclusion

Although generally considered safe, central venous catheters can be associated with complications such as catheter-related venous thrombosis. Intensivists who use these devices should be aware of this possible complication and may use strategies to prevent them in order to improve patient outcome. The present case highlights the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for thromboembolic complications in patients with CVCs.

Multivessel vs. culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention strategy in older adults with acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

The optima revascularization strategy for senior patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the context of multivessel coronary artery disease (MVCAD) remains unclear. We aimed to compare a strategy of culprit-vessel (CV) vs. multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MV-PCI) in older adults (≥75 years) with AMI.

METHODS

We analyzed four randomized controlled trials designed to include older adults with AMI. The primary endpoint was all-cause death. The secondary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke and major bleeding (Net Adverse Clinical Events, NACE). A non-parsimonious propensity score and nearest-neighbor matching was performed to account for bias.

RESULTS

A total of 1,334 trial participants were included; of them, 770 (57.7%) underwent CV-PCI and 564 (42.3%) a MV-PCI strategy. After a median follow-up of 365 days, patients treated with MV-PCI experienced a lower rate of death (6.0% vs. 9.9%; p = 0.01) and of NACE (11.2% vs. 15.5%; p = 0.016). After multivariable analysis, MV-PCI was independently associated with a lower hazard of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42-0.96; p = 0.03) and NACE (NACE 0.72[0.53-0.98]; p = 0.04). These results were confirmed in a matched propensity analysis, were consistent throughout the spectrum of older age and when analyzed by subgroups and when immortal-time bias was considered.

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of older adults with MVCAD who were managed invasively for AMI, a MV-PCI strategy to pursue complete revascularization was associated with better survival and lower risk of NACE compared to a CV-PCI. Adequately sized RCTs are required to confirm these findings.

Impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on short-term outcome in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction during COVID-19 pandemic: insights from the international multicenter ISACS-STEMI registry

Background

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is projected to become the third cause of mortality worldwide. COPD shares several pathophysiological mechanisms with cardiovascular disease, especially atherosclerosis. However, no definite answers are available on the prognostic role of COPD in the setting of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), especially during COVID-19 pandemic, among patients undergoing primary angioplasty, that is therefore the aim of the current study.

Methods

In the ISACS-STEMI COVID-19 registry we included retrospectively patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between March and June of 2019 and 2020 from 109 high-volume primary PCI centers in 4 continents.

Results

A total of 15,686 patients were included in this analysis. Of them, 810 (5.2%) subjects had a COPD diagnosis. They were more often elderly and with a more pronounced cardiovascular risk profile. No preminent procedural dissimilarities were noticed except for a lower proportion of dual antiplatelet therapy at discharge among COPD patients (98.9% vs. 98.1%, P = 0.038). With regards to short-term fatal outcomes, both in-hospital and 30-days mortality occurred more frequently among COPD patients, similarly in pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 era. However, after adjustment for main baseline differences, COPD did not result as independent predictor for in-hospital death (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 0.913[0.658–1.266], P = 0.585) nor for 30-days mortality (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 0.850 [0.620–1.164], P = 0.310). No significant differences were detected in terms of SARS-CoV-2 positivity between the two groups.

Conclusion

This is one of the largest studies investigating characteristics and outcome of COPD patients with STEMI undergoing primary angioplasty, especially during COVID pandemic. COPD was associated with significantly higher rates of in-hospital and 30-days mortality. However, this association disappeared after adjustment for baseline characteristics. Furthermore, COPD did not significantly affect SARS-CoV-2 positivity.

Trial registration number: NCT 04412655 (2nd June 2020).

Acute Coronary Syndromes and SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Results From an Observational Multicenter Registry During the Second Pandemic Spread in Lombardy

Background

COVID-19 had an adverse impact on the management and outcome of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), but most available data refer to March-April 2020.

Aim

This study aims to investigate the clinical characteristics, time of treatment, and clinical outcome of patients at hospitals serving as macro-hubs during the second pandemic wave of SARS-CoV-2 (November 2020-January 2021).

Methods and Results

Nine out of thirteen “macro-hubs” agreed to participate in the registry with a total of 941 patients included. The median age was 67 years (IQR 58-77) and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was the clinical presentation in 54% of cases. Almost all patients (97%) underwent coronary angiography, with more than 60% of patients transported to a macro-hub by the Emergency Medical Service (EMS). In the whole population of STEMI patients, the median time from symptom onset to First Medical Contact (FMC) was 64 min (IQR 30-180). The median time from FMC to CathLab was 69 min (IQR 39-105). A total of 59 patients (6.3%) presented a concomitant confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, and pneumonia was present in 42.4% of these cases. No significant differences were found between STEMI patients with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection in treatment time intervals. Patients with concomitant SARS-CoV-2 infection had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared to those without (16.9% vs. 3.6%, P < 0.0001). However, post-discharge mortality was similar to 6-month mortality (4.2% vs. 4.1%, P = 0.98). In the multivariate analysis, SARS-CoV-2 infection did not show an independent association with in-hospital mortality, whereas pneumonia had higher mortality (OR 5.65, P = 0.05).

Conclusion

During the second wave of SARS-CoV-2 infection, almost all patients with ACS received coronary angiography for STEMI with an acceptable time delay. Patients with concomitant infection presented a lower in-hospital survival with no difference in post-discharge mortality; infection by itself was not an independent predictor of mortality but pneumonia was.

Association of statin pretreatment with presentation characteristics, infarct size and outcome in older patients with acute coronary syndrome: the Elderly ACS-2 trial

BACKGROUND

prior statin treatment has been shown to have favourable effects on short- and long-term prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). There are limited data in older patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of previous statin therapy and presentation characteristics, infarct size and clinical outcome in older patients, with or without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), included in the Elderly-ACS 2 trial.

METHODS

data on statin use pre-admission were available for 1,192 of the 1,443 patients enrolled in the original trial. Of these, 531 (44.5%) were already taking statins. Patients were stratified based on established ASCVD and statin therapy. ACS was classified as non-ST elevation or ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Infarct size was measured by peak creatine kinase MB (CK-MB). All-cause death in-hospital and within 1 year were the major end points.

RESULTS

there was a significantly lower frequency of STEMI in statin patients, in both ASCVD and No-ASCVD groups. Peak CK-MB levels were lower in statin users (10 versus 25 ng/ml, P < 0.0001). There was lower all-cause death in-hospital and within 1 year for subjects with ASCVD already on statins independent of other baseline variables. There were no differences in all-cause death for No-ASCVD patients whether or not on statins.

CONCLUSIONS

statin pretreatment was associated with more favourable ACS presentation and lower myocardial damage in older ACS patients both ASCVD and No-ASCVD. The incidence of all-cause death (in-hospital and within 1 year) was significantly lower in the statin treated ASCVD patients.

COVID-19 pandemic, mechanical reperfusion and 30-day mortality in ST elevation myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

The initial data of the International Study on Acute Coronary Syndromes - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction COVID-19 showed in Europe a remarkable reduction in primary percutaneous coronary intervention procedures and higher in-hospital mortality during the initial phase of the pandemic as compared with the prepandemic period. The aim of the current study was to provide the final results of the registry, subsequently extended outside Europe with a larger inclusion period (up to June 2020) and longer follow-up (up to 30 days).

METHODS

This is a retrospective multicentre registry in 109 high-volume primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) centres from Europe, Latin America, South-East Asia and North Africa, enrolling 16 674 patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing PPPCI in March/June 2019 and 2020. The main study outcomes were the incidence of PPCI, delayed treatment (ischaemia time >12 hours and door-to-balloon >30 min), in-hospital and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

In 2020, during the pandemic, there was a significant reduction in PPCI as compared with 2019 (incidence rate ratio 0.843, 95% CI 0.825 to 0.861, p<0.0001). This reduction was significantly associated with age, being higher in older adults (>75 years) (p=0.015), and was not related to the peak of cases or deaths due to COVID-19. The heterogeneity among centres was high (p<0.001). Furthermore, the pandemic was associated with a significant increase in door-to-balloon time (40 (25-70) min vs 40 (25-64) min, p=0.01) and total ischaemia time (225 (135-410) min vs 196 (120-355) min, p<0.001), which may have contributed to the higher in-hospital (6.5% vs 5.3%, p<0.001) and 30-day (8% vs 6.5%, p=0.001) mortality observed during the pandemic.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous revascularisation for STEMI was significantly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, with a 16% reduction in PPCI procedures, especially among older patients (about 20%), and longer delays to treatment, which may have contributed to the increased in-hospital and 30-day mortality during the pandemic.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04412655.

Soluble CD40 ligand and outcome in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVES

CD40 ligand (CD40L), a transmembrane glycoprotein belonging to the tumor necrosis factor family and expressed by a variety of cells, is involved in the basic mechanisms of inflammation, atherosclerosis and thrombosis. Some studies suggest that the soluble form of CD40L (sCD40L) is a predictor of major cardiovascular events and mortality in a variety of clinical settings, but data from literature are conflicting.

METHODS

We studied consecutive patients with acute (ACS) or chronic (CCS) coronary syndrome who underwent percutaneous coronary artery intervention (PCI). Blood samples for sCD40L dosage were taken at baseline immediately before PCI. We tested the relation between sCD40L and pre-specified outcome measures consisting of new ACS, clinical restenosis and all-cause mortality. We recruited 3,841 patients (mean age 64 ± 11 years, 79% men) with ACS (n=2,383) or CCS (n=1,458).

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of two years (±0.6 years), 642 patients developed ACS, 409 developed restenosis (≥70% of at least one of the previously treated coronary segments) and 175 died. For each 1-standard deviation increase in sCD40L (0.80 ng/mL), the hazard ratios (HRs) for ACS, restenosis, and mortality were 1.11 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05 to 1.18, p<0.0001), 1.10 (95% CI: 1.02 to 1.19, p=0.010), and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.86 to 1.16, p=0.983), respectively. In multivariable Cox regression models with adjustment for several potential confounders including age, acute or chronic coronary syndrome, multi-vessel disease, stent placement, diabetes, previous coronary events and dyslipidemia, sCD40L remained an independent predictor of ACS and coronary restenosis. There were no interactions between sCD40L and acute or chronic coronary syndrome or stent placement.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with ACS or CCS who undergo PCI, higher levels of sCD40L predict an increased risk of acute coronary events and coronary restenosis, but not of mortality.

Algorithm for Individual Prediction of COVID-19-Related Hospitalization Based on Symptoms: Development and Implementation Study

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has placed a huge strain on the health care system globally. The metropolitan area of Milan, Italy, was one of the regions most impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide. Risk prediction models developed by combining administrative databases and basic clinical data are needed to stratify individual patient risk for public health purposes.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to develop a stratification tool aimed at improving COVID-19 patient management and health care organization.

METHODS

A predictive algorithm was developed and applied to 36,834 patients with COVID-19 in Italy between March 8 and the October 9, 2020, in order to foresee their risk of hospitalization. Exposures considered were age, sex, comorbidities, and symptoms associated with COVID-19 (eg, vomiting, cough, fever, diarrhea, myalgia, asthenia, headache, anosmia, ageusia, and dyspnea). The outcome was hospitalizations and emergency department admissions for COVID-19. Discrimination and calibration of the model were also assessed.

RESULTS

The predictive model showed a good fit for predicting COVID-19 hospitalization (C-index 0.79) and a good overall prediction accuracy (Brier score 0.14). The model was well calibrated (intercept -0.0028, slope 0.9970). Based on these results, 118,804 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 from October 25 to December 11, 2020, were stratified into low, medium, and high risk for COVID-19 severity. Among the overall study population, 67,030 (56.42%) were classified as low-risk patients; 43,886 (36.94%), as medium-risk patients; and 7888 (6.64%), as high-risk patients. In all, 89.37% (106,179/118,804) of the overall study population was being assisted at home, 9% (10,695/118,804) was hospitalized, and 1.62% (1930/118,804) died. Among those assisted at home, most people (63,983/106,179, 60.26%) were classified as low risk, whereas only 3.63% (3858/106,179) were classified at high risk. According to ordinal logistic regression, the odds ratio (OR) of being hospitalized or dead was 5.0 (95% CI 4.6-5.4) among high-risk patients and 2.7 (95% CI 2.6-2.9) among medium-risk patients, as compared to low-risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple monitoring system, based on primary care data sets linked to COVID-19 testing results, hospital admissions data, and death records may assist in the proper planning and allocation of patients and resources during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Hyperhidrosis: the neglected sign in heart failure patients

Profuse sweating is a symptom often reported by cardiological patients and could be also an early phenomenon of adaptation or rather cardiac maladaptation in the context of incipient heart failure (HF). By definition, in HF patients the low cardiac output causing reduced renal blood supply and reduced pressure in the arterial baroreceptors activate compensatory mechanisms such as the RAAS and the adrenergic autonomic nervous system. The retention of fluids caused by the decompensation of heart-kidney system could generate a reactive hyperhidrosis and even anticipate an incipient decompensation and might prevent manifest volume overload. Moreover, in HF patients the overactive sympathetic nervous system generates an increase in the reabsorption of fluids in the kidney, on the other hand it generates a signaling to the sweat glands to induce a dispersion of fluids, with loss of sodium and chlorine at the glandular ductal level. Finally sweat gland production physiology during physical activity is also altered in HF patients. This review is focused on sweating and its pathophysiological role in heart failure. Although all the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are not fully understood, there are interesting connections that might explain this fluid elimination as a wise and sophisticated way to prevent incipient heart failure crisis. Future research could be focused on studying new drugs that selectively would be able to promote fluid elimination by this specific way in patients suffering from heart failure.

Impact of Center Volume on Outcomes in Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A CULPRIT-SHOCK Substudy

Background

Little is known about the impact of center volume on outcomes in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between center volume, treatment strategies, and subsequent outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Methods and Results

In this subanalysis of the randomized CULPRIT‐SHOCK (Culprit Lesion Only PCI Versus Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock) trial, study sites were categorized based on the annual volume of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock into low‐/intermediate‐/high‐volume centers (<50; 50–100; and >100 cases/y). Subjects from the study/compulsory registry with available volume data were included. Baseline/procedural characteristics, overall treatment, and 1‐year all‐cause mortality were compared across categories. n=1032 patients were included in this study (537 treated at low‐volume, 240 at intermediate‐volume, and 255 at high‐volume centers). Baseline risk profile of patients across the volume categories was similar, although high‐volume centers included a larger number of older patients. Low‐/intermediate‐volume centers had more resuscitated patients (57.5%/58.8% versus 42.2%; P<0.01), and more patients on mechanical ventilation in comparison to high‐volume centers. There were no differences in reperfusion success despite considerable differences in adjunctive pharmacological/device therapies. There was no difference in 1‐year all‐cause mortality across volume categories (51.1% versus 56.5% versus 54.4%; P=0.34).

Conclusions

In this study of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock, considerable differences in adjunctive medical and mechanical support therapies were observed. However, we could not detect an impact of center volume on reperfusion success or mortality.

In-hospital outcomes in nonagenarian patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Objective

The aim of the present analysis was to evaluate the incidence and predictors of in-hospital adverse outcomes in nonagenarian patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Methods

Consecutive nonagenarian patients undergoing pPCI for STEMI from 2009 to 2019 were retrospectively included in an international multicenter registry. In-hospital all-cause death was the primary outcome.

Results

A total of 308 patients were included (mean age 92.5±2.5 years, 65.6% female). Mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) at hospital admission was 130.7±33.5 mmHg, 46 (17%) patients presented with a Killip class III-IV, mean left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) was 40.0±11.5% and 147 (58%) patients were independent in everyday activities. In-hospital death occurred in 99 patients (32%). [Figure 1] After multivariate adjustment, lower LVEF (OR per unit reduction 1.08, 95% CI 1.03–1.11, p-value &lt;0.001), lower SBP (OR 0.98 per mmHg reduction, 95% CI 1.01–1.03, p-value 0.001) and being not independent at home (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.25–5.26, p-value 0.01) resulted independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. [Figure 2] A sensitivity analysis performed in final TIMI 3 flow population confirmed the prognostic role of LVEF and independency on in-hospital mortality.

Conclusion

Nonagenarian patients presenting with STEMI and undergoing pPCI have high in-hospital mortality. Independency in everyday life is a strong independent predictor of survival to hospital discharge.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1Figure 2

Impact of center-volume on outcomes in myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock – a CULPRIT-SHOCK sub-study

Background

Little is known about the impact of center-volume on outcomes in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS). The aim of this study was to investigate the association between center-volume, treatment strategies and subsequent outcome in patients with AMI-CS.

Methods

In this subanalysis of the randomized CULPRIT-SHOCK trial, study sites were categorized based on the annual volume of AMI-CS into low/intermediate/high volume centers (&lt;50; 50–100;&gt;100 cases/year). Subjects from the study/compulsory registry with available volume data were included. Baseline/procedural characteristics, overall treatment and 1-year all-cause mortality were compared across categories.

Results

N=1032 patients were included in this study (537 treated at low-volume, 240 at intermediate-volume and 255 at high volume centers). Baseline risk profile of patients across the volume categories was similar, although high volume centers included more older patients. Low/intermediate-volume centers had more resuscitated patients (57.5%/58.8% vs. 42.2%; p&lt;0.01), and more patients on mechanical ventilation in comparison to high volume centers. Mechanical circulatory support differed with more use in low/intermediate-volume centers and overall lower use in high-volume centers (30.7%/36.7% vs. 19.2%; p&lt;0.001). There were no differences in reperfusion success despite considerable differences in adjunctive pharmacological/device therapies (figure 1). There was no difference in 1-year all-cause mortality across volume categories (51.1% vs. 56.5% vs. 54.4%; p=0.34).

Conclusion

In this study of patients with AMI-CS, considerable differences in adjunctive medical and mechanical support therapies was observed. However, we could not detect an impact of center volume on reperfusion success or mortality.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): The CULPRIT-SHOCK trial was funded by European Union, Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) Grant agreement n°602202, German Heart Research Foundation Treatment according to center volumeLong-term survival

Association of Sex with Outcome in Elderly Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND

Worse outcomes have been reported for women, compared with men, after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Whether this difference persists in elderly patients undergoing similar invasive treatment has not been studied. We investigated sex-related differences in 1-year outcome of elderly acute coronary syndrome patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

Patients 75 years and older successfully treated with PCI were selected among those enrolled in 3 Italian multicenter studies. Cox regression analysis was used to assess the independent predictive value of sex on outcome at 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 2035 patients (44% women) were included. Women were older and most likely to present with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), diabetes, hypertension, and renal dysfunction; men were more frequently overweight, with multivessel coronary disease, prior myocardial infarction, and revascularizations. Overall, no sex disparity was found about all-cause (8.3% vs 7%, P = .305) and cardiovascular mortality (5.7% vs 4.1%, P = .113). Higher cardiovascular mortality was observed in women after STEMI (8.8%) vs 5%, P = .041), but not after non ST-elevation-ACS (3.5% vs 3.7%, P = .999). A sensitivity analysis excluding patients with prior coronary events (N = 1324, 48% women) showed a significantly higher cardiovascular death in women (5.4% vs 2.9%, P = .025). After adjustment for baseline clinical variables, female sex did not predict adverse outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly men and women with ACS show different clinical presentation and baseline risk profile. After successful PCI, unadjusted 1-year cardiovascular mortality was significantly higher in women with STEMI and in those with a first coronary event. However, female sex did not predict cardiovascular mortality after adjustment for the different baseline variables.

Management of acute coronary syndromes in older adults

Older patients are underrepresented in prospective studies and randomized clinical trials of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Over the last decade, a few specific trials have been conducted in this population, allowing more evidence-based management. Older adults are a heterogeneous, complex, and high-risk group whose management requires a multidimensional clinical approach beyond coronary anatomic variables. This review focuses on available data informing evidence-based interventional and pharmacological approaches for older adults with ACS, including guideline-directed management. Overall, an invasive approach appears to demonstrate a better benefit-risk ratio compared to a conservative one across the ACS spectrum, even considering patients' clinical complexity and multiple comorbidities. Conversely, more powerful strategies of antithrombotic therapy for secondary prevention have been associated with increased bleeding events and no benefit in terms of mortality reduction. An interdisciplinary evaluation with geriatric assessment should always be considered to achieve a holistic approach and optimize any treatment on the basis of the underlying biological vulnerability.

International Prospective Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients With COVID-19

Background

Published data suggest worse outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients and concurrent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Mechanisms remain unclear.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to report the demographics, angiographic findings, and in-hospital outcomes of COVID-19 ACS patients and compare these with pre–COVID-19 cohorts.

Methods

From March 1, 2020 to July 31, 2020, data from 55 international centers were entered into a prospective, COVID-ACS Registry. Patients were COVID-19 positive (or had a high index of clinical suspicion) and underwent invasive coronary angiography for suspected ACS. Outcomes were in-hospital major cardiovascular events (all-cause mortality, re–myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, unplanned revascularization, or stent thrombosis). Results were compared with national pre–COVID-19 databases (MINAP [Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project] 2019 and BCIS [British Cardiovascular Intervention Society] 2018 to 2019).

Results

In 144 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 121 non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients, symptom-to-admission times were significantly prolonged (COVID-STEMI vs. BCIS: median 339.0 min vs. 173.0 min; p < 0.001; COVID NSTE-ACS vs. MINAP: 417.0 min vs. 295.0 min; p = 0.012). Mortality in COVID-ACS patients was significantly higher than BCIS/MINAP control subjects in both subgroups (COVID-STEMI: 22.9% vs. 5.7%; p < 0.001; COVID NSTE-ACS: 6.6% vs. 1.2%; p < 0.001), which remained following multivariate propensity analysis adjusting for comorbidities (STEMI subgroup odds ratio: 3.33 [95% confidence interval: 2.04 to 5.42]). Cardiogenic shock occurred in 20.1% of COVID-STEMI patients versus 8.7% of BCIS patients (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In this multicenter international registry, COVID-19–positive ACS patients presented later and had increased in-hospital mortality compared with a pre–COVID-19 ACS population. Excessive rates of and mortality from cardiogenic shock were major contributors to the worse outcomes in COVID-19 positive STEMI patients.

Bleeding risk prediction in elderly patients managed invasively for acute coronary syndromes: External validation of the PRECISE-DAPT and PARIS scores

BACKGROUND

We sought to assess and compare the prediction power of the PRECISE-DAPT and PARIS risk scores with regards to bleeding events in elderly patients suffering from acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and undergoing invasive management.

METHODS

Our external validation cohort included 1883 patients older >74 years admitted for ACS and treated with PCI from 3 prospective, multicenter trials.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 365 days, patients in the high-risk categories according to the PRECISE-DAPT score experienced a higher rate of BARC 3-5 bleedings (p = 0.002) while this was not observed for those in the high-risk category according to the PARIS risk score (p = 0.3). Both scores had a moderate discriminative power (c-statistics 0.70 and 0.64, respectively) and calibration was accurate for both risk scores (all χ² > 0.05), but PARIS risk score was associated to a greater overestimation of the risk (p = 0.02). Decision curve analysis was in favor of the PRECISE-DAPT score up to a risk threshold of 2%.

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of older adults managed invasively for ACS both the PARIS and the PRECISE-DAPT scores were moderately accurate in predicting bleeding risk. However, the use of the PRECISE-DAPT is associated with better performance.

Management of acute coronary syndromes during the COVID-19 outbreak in Lombardy: The "macro-hub" experience

Background

During the COVID-19 outbreak, healthcare Authorities of Lombardy modified the regional network concerning time-dependent emergencies. Specifically, 13 Macro-Hubs were identified to deliver timely optimal care to patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Aim of this paper is to present the results of this experience.

Methods and Results

This is a multicenter, observational study. A total of 953 patients were included, presenting with STEMI in 57.7% of the cases. About 98% of patients received coronary angiography with a median since first medical contact to angiography of 79 (IQR 45–124) minutes for STEMI and 1262 (IQR 643–2481) minutes for NSTEMI.

A total of 107 patients (11.2%) had SARS-CoV2 infection, mostly with STEMI (74.8%). The time interval from first medical contact to cath-lab was significant shorter in patients with COVID-19, both in the overall population and in STEMI patients (87 (IQR 41–310) versus 160 (IQR 67–1220) minutes, P = 0.001, and 61 (IQR 23–98) versus 80 (IQR 47–126) minutes, P = 0.01, respectively). In-hospital mortality and cardiogenic shock rates were higher among patients with COVID-19 compared to patients without (32% vs 6%, P < 0.0001, and 16.8% vs 6.7%, P < 0.0003, respectively).

Conclusions

During the COVID-19 outbreak in Lombardy, the redefinition of ACS network according to enlarged Macro-Hubs allowed to continue with timely ACS management, while reserving a high number of intensive care beds for the pandemic. Patients with ACS and COVID-19 presented a worst outcome, particularly in case of STEMI.

Bleeding risk prediction in elderly patients managed invasively for Acute Coronary Syndromes: external validation of the PRECISE-DAPT and PARIS risk scores

Background

Tailoring Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) to each patient bleeding and ischemic risk profile is a majopr challenge in everyday clinical practice. As the elderlies were underrepresented in validation cohorts of bleeding risk scores, their generalizability in this context is uncertain.

Purpose

We sought to assess the clinical utility of the PRECISE-DAPT and PARIS bleeding risk scores to elderly patients suffering from ACS and undergoing invasive management.

Methods

Our external validation cohort included 1,883 patients older &gt;74 years admitted for ACS and treated with PCI from 3 multicenter, randomized trials. Bleeding risk scores were calculated on a patient-level and subjects were stratified into risk categories according to each risk score definition.

Results

After a median follow-up of 365 days, patients in the high-risk categories according to the PRECISE-DAPT score experienced a higher rate of BARC 3–5 bleedings (log rank p=0.002) while this was not observed for those in the high-risk category according to the PARIS risk score (log rank p=0.3). Both scores had a moderate discriminative power (c-statistics 0.70 and 0.64, respectively) and calibration was accurate for both risk scores (all χ2&gt;0.05), but PARIS risk score was associated to a greater overestimation of the risk (mean D observed-predicted probability = −0.65 for PRECISE DAPT and −4.62 for PARIS, p=0.02; Figure 1). Decision curve analysis was in favor of the PRECISE-DAPT score up to a risk threshold of 2%. A sensitivity showed that calibration and discrimination power was moderate for both risk scores also after including BARC 2 events.

Conclusion

In the setting of older adults managed invasively for ACS both the PARIS and the PRECISE-DAPT scores were moderately accurate in predicting bleeding risk. However, the use of the PRECISE-DAPT is associated with better performance and a higher net benefit.

Figure 1

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Temporal Trends in Invasive Management and In-Hospital Mortality of Patients With Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes and Chronic Kidney Disease

We analyzed data from 4 nationwide prospective registries of consecutive patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) admitted to the Italian Intensive Cardiac Care Unit network between 2005 and 2014. Out of 26 315 patients with ACS enrolled, 13 073 (49.7%) presented a diagnosis of non-ST elevation (NSTE)-ACS and had creatinine levels available at hospital admission: 1207 (9.2%) had severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30), 3803 (29.1%) mild to moderate CKD (eGFR 31-59), and 8063 (61.7%) no CKD (eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m²). Patients with severe CKD had worse clinical characteristics compared with those with mild-moderate or no kidney dysfunction, including all the key predictors of mortality (P < .0001) which became worse over time (all P < .0001). Over the decade of observation, a significant increase in percutaneous coronary intervention rates was observed in patients without CKD (P for trend = .0001), but not in those with any level of CKD. After corrections for significant mortality predictors, severe CKD (odds ratio, OR: 5.49; 95% CI: 3.24-9.29; P < .0001) and mild-moderate CKD (OR: 2.33; 95% CI: 1.52-3.59; P < .0001) remained strongly associated with higher in-hospital mortality. The clinical characteristics of patients with NSTE-ACS and CKD remain challenging and their mortality rate is still higher compared with patients without CKD.