Are we overusing ultrasound in non-traumatic acute abdominal pain?

The justification of non-obstetric ultrasound referrals: A safe and effective practice

INTRODUCTION

In 2015 the British Medical Ultrasound Society released a referral justification document for rejection of inappropriate ultrasound referrals to help manage increasing demand and ensure correct utilisation of diagnostic imaging tests. In our trust, referrals that were not aligned with the guidance were cancelled and returned to general practitioners, providing reasons for cancellation and advising other diagnostic tests if appropriate.Methodology: In total, 1000 cases cancelled between April and August 2019 were retrospectively audited by a team of clinical specialist sonographers. Interoperator agreement against BMUS justification guidelines and safety of this cancellation process were established. Duplicate imaging referrals, referrals made that should have been placed on management pathways or referrals cancelled by the patient directly were excluded in the safety assessment.

RESULTS

There was strong agreement amongst sonographers regarding cancellations. After exclusions, 389 cases were included for review. The majority (90.5%) required no onward imaging and were therefore deemed cancelled appropriately. There were 37 patients found with pathology on subsequent imaging, two of which were found to have cancer and the remainder with benign pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, we found the cancellation process to be safe and the justification document easy to utilise in practice. This process has ensured a minimal waiting time for ultrasound imaging is maintained and that demand can be managed to meet the available capacity.

A Primary Care Approach to Abdominal Pain in Adults

Abdominal pain is a common presenting problem with multiple aetiologies that often pose diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas for primary care practitioners. The vague symptomatology and difficult correlation to specific organ pathology obscures clinical findings leading to incorrect diagnoses. Although most presentations of abdominal pain are benign, a significant number of patients have life-threatening conditions that require a meticulous approach to management in order to prevent morbidity and mortality. The skill in assessing patients presenting with abdominal pain is fundamental for all primary care doctors. This review will discuss an approach to the assessment and diagnosis of abdominal pain in the primary care setting.

Appropriateness of Computed Tomography and Ultrasound for Abdominal Complaints in the Emergency Department

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) examinations ordered in the emergency department (ED) for abdominal complaints.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed 154 CTs and 154 US orders for appropriateness using evidence-based recommendations by the American College of Radiology. The sample was powered to show a prevalence of inappropriate orders of 25% with a margin of error of 7.5%. Findings in the final reports were compared to the initial clinical diagnosis classified in 4 categories: normal, compatible with initial diagnosis, alternative diagnosis, and inconclusive. We also evaluated the frequency in which a second imaging modality was ordered on the same visit.

RESULTS

A total of 135 CT and 143 US examinations had complete clinical information to allow evaluation of order appropriateness. The rate of inappropriate orders was 36.3% for CT and 84.4% for US. The final report of appropriate orders was significantly more likely to demonstrate findings compatible with the initial diagnosis for both CT (76.7% vs 20.4%, P < 0.0001) and US (38.9% vs 14.4%, P = 0.0093). Inappropriately ordered CT scans were more likely to show no abnormalities (46.9 vs 16.3%, P = 0.0001). An additional imaging order with a secondary modality was requested in 20% of the inappropriate US orders, and 8.2% of the inappropriate CT orders.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of inappropriate examinations in the ED was 36.3% for CT and 84.4% for US. Appropriately ordered exams were more likely to yield imaging findings compatible with the initial diagnosis for both modalities.

Benefit of early abdominal ultrasonography in non-surgical patients admitted to the emergency department: a pilot study

PURPOSE

Ultrasonography plays a decisive role in emergency patients. The primary aim of this study is to assess whether early emergency ultrasonography alters the length of stay.

METHODS

In a prospective study, patients admitted to the emergency department were divided into two groups. The first group underwent early abdominal ultrasonography (within 24 h after admission), and the second group underwent ultrasonography after more than 24 h. The two groups were compared in terms of length of stay, age, admission diagnosis, and number of further imaging techniques used. A subgroup analysis was carried out for admission diagnosis. One hundred and forty-five patients were included in the study.

RESULTS

In terms of length of stay, no difference was seen between the first group (11.7 ± 11.4 days) and the second group (13.6 ± 11.0 days) (p = 0.1196). In the subgroups "abdominal pain" (p = 0.0333) and "cardiopulmonary disorders" (p = 0.0207), a shorter length of stay was associated with early ultrasonography, while in the subgroup "infectious disease/fever," the early ultrasonography group was associated with a prolonged length of stay (p = 0.0211).

CONCLUSION

Early ultrasonography in our setting of emergency patients with a variety of different admission diagnoses did not shorten the length of stay, but the subgroups of patients with "abdominal pain" and "cardiopulmonary disorders" might have benefited from early ultrasonography.

[Modern sonography in the diagnosis of acute abdomen]

Acute abdomen is a serious clinical situation and prompt imaging is mandatory so that appropriate therapeutic measures can be taken. Multiple diseases can present with the clinical signs and symptoms of acute abdomen. Ultrasound is widely available and can be performed expeditiously. Recently, major technical innovations in ultrasound technology were introduced which greatly enhanced the diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of acute abdomen. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is among these valuable innovations. In this article the application of modern ultrasound techniques for the diagnosis of the most common causes of acute abdomen is outlined, which may be due to diseases of the gastro-intestinal tract, parenchymal organs in the upper abdomen as well as vascular disorders. Moreover, the diagnostic efficacy and the value as compared to other imaging modalities are analyzed.

[Impact of computed tomography on patient's care in nontraumatic acute abdomen: 90 patients]

OBJECTIVES

To determine the contribution of computerized tomography (CT) to the management of nontraumatic acute abdomen, to evaluate interobserver agreement and the contribution of CT to cost control, to look for the predictive factors of CT.

PATIENTS

and method. Ninety prospectively included patients, admitted for nontraumatic acute abdomen and examined by a surgeon, received CT examination. Diagnosis and treatment 1) envisioned before and 2) defined after CT, and 3) finally retained were compared, and the interobserver agreement was calculated after the second reading. The predictive value of the clinical and biological criteria as well as the radiological criteria characterizing these patients was sought.

RESULTS

CT was contributive in 68.9% of cases, with a reliable diagnosis and treatment strategy, defined after CT examination, for 92.2% and 90%, respectively. Interobserver agreement was 93.3%. CT contributed to reducing costs in 15.5% of patients, for an additional cost estimated at 104-139 euros. The positive predictive factors of the CT contribution were age over 70 years, localized symptoms, fever, and high CRP.

CONCLUSION

In agreement with the literature, in our study CT appears to be a choice examination to guide patient care in nontraumatic acute abdomen.