Diagnostic Performance of MRI for the Detection of Pulmonary Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose To perform a meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MRI for the detection of pulmonary nodules, with use of CT as the reference standard. Materials and Methods PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and other databases were systematically searched for studies published from January 2000 to March 2023 evaluating the performance of MRI for diagnosis of lung nodules measuring 4 mm or larger, with CT as reference. Studies including micronodules, nodules without size stratification, or those from which data for contingency tables could not be extracted were excluded. Primary outcomes were the per-lesion sensitivity of MRI and the rate of false-positive nodules per patient (FPP). Subgroup analysis by size and meta-regression with other covariates were performed. The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, or PROSPERO (no. CRD42023437509). Results Ten studies met inclusion criteria (1354 patients and 2062 CT-detected nodules). Overall, per-lesion sensitivity of MRI for nodules measuring 4 mm or larger was 87.7% (95% CI: 81.1, 92.2), while the FPP rate was 12.4% (95% CI: 7.0, 21.1). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that MRI sensitivity was 98.5% (95% CI: 90.4, 99.8) for nodules measuring at least 8-10 mm and 80.5% (95% CI: 71.5, 87.1) for nodules less than 8 mm. Conclusion MRI demonstrated a good overall performance for detection of pulmonary nodules measuring 4 mm or larger and almost equal performance to CT for nodules measuring at least 8-10 mm, with a low rate of FPP. Systematic review registry no. CRD42023437509 Keywords: Lung Nodule, Lung Cancer, Lung Cancer Screening, MRI, CT Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.

MRI with DWI improves detection of liver metastasis and selection of surgical candidates with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate if magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) adds value compared to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) alone in the preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant published studies through October 2022. Studies met eligibility criteria if they evaluated the per-patient diagnostic performance of MRI with DWI in the preoperative evaluation of newly diagnosed pancreatic cancer compared to CECT. Our primary outcome was the number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one futile surgery using MRI with DWI, defined as those in which CECT was negative and MRI with DWI was positive for liver metastasis (i.e., surgical intervention in metastatic disease missed by CECT). The secondary outcomes were to determine the diagnostic performance and the NNT of MRI with DWI to change management in pancreatic cancer.

RESULTS

Nine studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 1121 patients, of whom 172 had liver metastasis (15.3%). The proportion of futile surgeries reduced by MRI with DWI was 6.0% (95% CI, 3.0-11.6%), yielding an NNT of 16.6. The proportion of cases that MRI with DWI changed management was 18.1% (95% CI, 9.9-30.7), corresponding to an NNT of 5.5. The per-patient sensitivity and specificity of MRI were 92.4% (95% CI, 87.4-95.6%) and 97.3% (95% CI, 96.0-98.1).

CONCLUSION

MRI with DWI may prevent futile surgeries in pancreatic cancer by improving the detection of occult liver metastasis on preoperative CECT with an NNT of 16.6.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

MRI with DWI complements the standard preoperative CECT evaluation for liver metastasis in pancreatic cancer, improving the selection of surgical candidates and preventing unnecessary surgeries.

KEY POINTS

• The NNT of MRI with DWI to prevent potential futile surgeries due to occult liver metastasis on CECT, defined as those in which CECT was negative and MRI with DWI was positive for liver metastasis, in patients with pancreatic cancer was 16.6. • The higher performance of MRI with DWI to detect liver metastasis occult on CECT can be attributed to an increased detection of subcentimeter liver metastasis.

Detection of Liver Lesions in Colorectal Cancer Patients Using 18F-FDG PET/CT Dual-Time-Point Scan Imaging

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of dual-time-point fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission computed tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) compared to conventional early imaging for detecting colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-four consecutive CRC patients underwent dual-time-point imaging scans on a retrospective basis. Histopathological confirmation and/or clinical follow-up were accepted as the gold standard. Standard uptake values (SUV), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), retention index (RI), tumor-to-normal liver ratio (TNR), and lesion sizes were measured for early and delayed PET scans. The diagnostic performance of early and delayed images was calculated on a per-patient basis and compared using McNemar's test.

RESULTS

Among the 124 patients, 57 (46%) had CRLM, 6 (4.8%) had benign lesions, and 61 (49.2%) had no concerning lesions detected. Smaller CRLM lesions (<5 cm3) showed significantly higher uptake in the delayed scans relative to early imaging (p < 0.001). The SUV and TNR increased significantly in delayed imaging of all metastatic lesions (p < 0.001). The retention index of all CRLM was high (40.8%), especially for small lesions (54.8%). A total of 177 lesions in delayed images and 124 in standard early images were identified. In a per-patient analysis, delayed imaging had significantly higher sensitivity (100% vs. 87.7%) and specificity (91.0% vs. 94.0%) compared to early imaging (p-value = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The detection of liver lesions using dual-time-point PET/CT scan improves the sensitivity and specificity for the detection of colorectal liver metastasis.

Machine learning for malignant versus benign focal liver lesions on US and CEUS: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To perform a meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of learning (ML) algorithms (conventional and deep learning algorithms) for the classification of malignant versus benign focal liver lesions (FLLs) on US and CEUS.

METHODS

Available databases were searched for relevant published studies through September 2022. Studies met eligibility criteria if they evaluate the diagnostic performance of ML for the classification of malignant and benign focal liver lesions on US and CEUS. The pooled per-lesion sensitivities and specificities for each modality with 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 8 studies on US, 11 on CEUS, and 1 study evaluating both methods met the inclusion criteria with a total of 34,245 FLLs evaluated. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of ML for the malignancy classification of FLLs were 81.7% (95% CI, 77.2-85.4%) and 84.8% (95% CI, 76.0-90.8%) for US, compared to 87.1% (95% CI, 81.8-91.0%) and 87.0% (95% CI, 83.1-90.1%) for CEUS. In the subgroup analysis of studies that evaluated deep learning algorithms, the sensitivity and specificity of CEUS (n = 4) increased to 92.4% (95% CI, 88.5-95.0%) and 88.2% (95% CI, 81.1-92.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic performance of ML algorithms for the malignant classification of FLLs was high for both US and CEUS with overall similar sensitivity and specificity. The similar performance of US may be related to the higher prevalence of DL models in that group.

Appropriateness of Computed Tomography and Ultrasound for Abdominal Complaints in the Emergency Department

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) examinations ordered in the emergency department (ED) for abdominal complaints.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed 154 CTs and 154 US orders for appropriateness using evidence-based recommendations by the American College of Radiology. The sample was powered to show a prevalence of inappropriate orders of 25% with a margin of error of 7.5%. Findings in the final reports were compared to the initial clinical diagnosis classified in 4 categories: normal, compatible with initial diagnosis, alternative diagnosis, and inconclusive. We also evaluated the frequency in which a second imaging modality was ordered on the same visit.

RESULTS

A total of 135 CT and 143 US examinations had complete clinical information to allow evaluation of order appropriateness. The rate of inappropriate orders was 36.3% for CT and 84.4% for US. The final report of appropriate orders was significantly more likely to demonstrate findings compatible with the initial diagnosis for both CT (76.7% vs 20.4%, P < 0.0001) and US (38.9% vs 14.4%, P = 0.0093). Inappropriately ordered CT scans were more likely to show no abnormalities (46.9 vs 16.3%, P = 0.0001). An additional imaging order with a secondary modality was requested in 20% of the inappropriate US orders, and 8.2% of the inappropriate CT orders.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of inappropriate examinations in the ED was 36.3% for CT and 84.4% for US. Appropriately ordered exams were more likely to yield imaging findings compatible with the initial diagnosis for both modalities.