Prospective study of acute gastrointestinal bleeding attributable to anti-inflammatory drug ingestion in the Yorkshire region of the United Kingdom

A Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score of >2 Is a Poor Predictor of Endoscopic Intervention in Nonvariceal Upper GI Bleeding

OBJECTIVES

Recent data show that a Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score (GBS) >2 does not identify patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding who benefit from inpatient esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). This study aimed to determine the rate of endoscopic hemostatic interventions (HI) in patients with nonvariceal acute GI bleeding (NVAUGIB) admitted with a GBS >2. Secondary aims included comparison of clinical outcomes in patients with and without HI and cost of nontherapeutic EGDs.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of medical records of patients admitted to a referral hospital for NVAUGIB from January 2015 to December 2017. Mortality, blood transfusion rates, length of stay, length of intensive care unit stay, and cost of a nontherapeutic EGD were outcomes of interest. Patients 18 years of age and older of both sexes were included. The accuracy of the GBS >2 cutoff was determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 357 patients were included and only 58 (16.2%) required HI. The area under the curve for GBS >2 as a predictor of HI was 0.57. The performance of HI did not influence mortality (P = 0.33), blood transfusion rates (P = 0.51), length of stay (P = 0.2), or length of intensive care unit stay (P = 0.36). The estimated cost of performing nontherapeutic EGD was approximately $855,000 for the 299 patients who did not need HI.

CONCLUSIONS

A GBS cutoff of >2 is not an accurate criterion to triage patients with NVAUGIB for inpatient emergent EGD. More clinically meaningful and cost-effective methods to triage these patients are necessary.

Risk factors associated with NSAID-induced upper gastrointestinal bleeding resulting in hospital admissions: A cross-sectional, retrospective, case series analysis in valencia, spain

Abstract.

BACKGROUND

NSAIDs are a significant cause of drug-related hospital admissions and deaths. The therapeutic effects of NSAIDs have been associated with the risk for developing adverse events, mainly in the gastrointestinal tract.

OBJECTIVES

The focus of this study was to identify the most common risk factors associated with NSAID-induced upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) resulting in hospital admissions. A secondary end point was the relationship between use of gastroprotective treatment and relevant risk factors to NSAID-induced UGIB in the selected population.

METHODS

This study was a cross-sectional, retrospective, case-series analysis of NSAID-induced UGIB resulting in hospital admission to the Requena General Hospital, Valencia, Spain, occurring from 1997 to 2005. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes were used to identify UGIB admissions associated with NSAIDs. To estimate the probability of association between UGIB and the use of NSAIDs, the Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability was used. Patients were categorized as high-risk to develop UGIB if they met ≥1 of the following risk criteria (relevant risk factors): aged ≥65 years (age risk factor); peptic ulcer disease or NSAID gastropathy occurring in the year before their hospital admission (history risk factor); and concomitant use of other NSAIDs, systemic corticoids, oral anticoagulants, or platelet aggregation inhibitors (concomitant medication risk factor). Patients were categorized as candidates to use gastroprotections if they met ≥1 of the relevant risk factors. Patients were categorized as users of gastroprotective treatment if they used proton pump inhibitors, histamine H2-receptor antagonists, or misoprostol at hospital admission.

RESULTS

This study comprised 209 cases of NSAID-induced UGIB (129 men, 80 women: mean [SD] age, 71.5 [13.8] years; 128 [61.2%] receiving acetyl salicylic acid [ASA], with 72 [34.4%] receiving low-dose [80-325 mg] ASA). Prevalence of relevant risk factors for UGIB were as follows: age, 158 (75.6%) patients; history, 37 (17.7%); and concomitant medication, 35 (16.7%). One hundred seventy-eight (85.2%) patients met ≥1 criterion for using a gastroprotective agent; 28 (15.6%) were actually using one. Only the history risk factor was significantly associated with the use of gastroprotective treatment (P = 0.007; odds ratio = 3.17).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of NSAID-induced UGIB resulting in hospital admission, age was the most common risk factor. However, this criterion was not associated with the use of gastroprotective agents. A large number of cases were associated with the use of ASA, primarily in those receiving low doses. A significant lack of gastroprotective agent use was observed in patients who met the criteria to use them.

Mortality associated with gastrointestinal bleeding events: Comparing short-term clinical outcomes of patients hospitalized for upper GI bleeding and acute myocardial infarction in a US managed care setting

OBJECTIVES

To compare the short-term mortality rates of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding to those of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) by estimating the 30-, 60-, and 90-day mortality among hospitalized patients.

METHODS

United States national health plan claims data (1999-2003) were used to identify patients hospitalized with a GI bleeding event. Patients were propensity-matched to AMI patients with no evidence of GI bleed from the same US health plan.

RESULTS

12,437 upper GI-bleed patients and 22,847 AMI patients were identified. Propensity score matching yielded 6,923 matched pairs. Matched cohorts were found to have a similar Charlson Comorbidity Index score and to be similar on nearly all utilization and cost measures (excepting emergency room costs). A comparison of outcomes among the matched cohorts found that AMI patients had higher rates of 30-day mortality (4.35% vs 2.54%; p < 0.0001) and rehospitalization (2.56% vs 1.79%; p = 0.002), while GI bleed patients were more likely to have a repeat procedure (72.38% vs 44.95%; p < 0.001) following their initial hospitalization. The majority of the difference in overall 30-day mortality between GI bleed and AMI patients was accounted for by mortality during the initial hospitalization (1.91% vs 3.58%).

CONCLUSIONS

GI bleeding events result in significant mortality similar to that of an AMI after adjusting for the initial hospitalization.

Introduction of newer selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors and rates of hospitalization with bleeding and perforated peptic ulcer

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist on the impact of the introduction of newer selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors into clinical practice in 1999 on overall non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and hospitalization rates of complicated peptic ulcer disease at the population level.

AIM

To examine these issues, we conducted a population-based study in western Denmark, within a population of 1.2 million.

METHODS

All patients with perforated (n = 1488) or bleeding peptic ulcer (n = 6017) between 1996 and 2004 were identified in hospital discharge registries. We computed standardized annual hospitalization rates and hospitalization rate ratios using Poisson regression. Data on annual number of prescriptions for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were obtained through population-based prescription databases. Results Introduction of newer selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors was followed by a 44% increase in the annual number of prescriptions for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs--almost entirely due to increased use of newer selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors. Annual standardized hospitalization rates for bleeding peptic ulcer remained stable. Standardized hospitalization rates for perforated peptic ulcer decreased from 17 per 100,000 person-years in 1996 to 12 per 100,000 person-years in 2004 (HRR 0.71; 95% CI: 0.57-0.88). Conclusion Introduction of newer selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors was followed by substantial increase in overall non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and coincided with stable and decreasing hospitalization rates for bleeding and perforated peptic ulcer, respectively.

Perioperative acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in older patients with hip fracture: incidence, risk factors and prevention

BACKGROUND

No specific preventive strategy exists for acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage in hip fracture patients.

AIMS

To determine the effectiveness of prophylactic use of proton pump inhibitors in patients with risk factors for acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

METHODS

Prospective two-stage study of 822 consecutive older (> or =60 years) hip fracture patients.

RESULTS

Acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage occurred in 16 (3.9%) of 407 patients and was associated with increased length of hospital stay (28.7 vs. 15.9; P = 0.0027) and mortality (18.8% vs. 4.3%; P = 0.043). Multiple analysis identified five independent risk factors for acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage: pre-existing peptic ulcer (OR 4.3; P = 0.043), current smoking (OR 3.1; P = 0.023), post-operative use of an antiplatelet agent (OR 6.5; P = 0.046), post-operative use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug/cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor (OR 4.9; P = 0.06) and blood group O (OR 1.7; P = 0.046). These risk factors were highly sensitive and had a negative predictive value of 99.8%. Prophylactic use of proton pump inhibitors in patients with risk factor for acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage significantly reduced the incidence of this complication (0.72% in treated patients vs. 13.4% in untreated; P < 0.001); the number needed to treat was 7.9. Conclusions In older hip fracture patients perioperative acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage occurs in 3.9% and is associated with poor outcome. Preventive proton pump inhibitor therapy in patients at risk of acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage is effective and safe.

30-day mortality after peptic ulcer perforation among users of newer selective COX-2 inhibitors and traditional NSAIDs: a population-based study

OBJECTIVES

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use is a strong risk factor for peptic ulcer perforation, yet little is known about the outcome of this condition among NSAID users. We examined 30-day mortality after peptic ulcer perforation associated with the use of traditional NSAIDs and newer selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study of patients with the first hospitalization for peptic ulcer perforation, identified in discharge registries of three Danish counties between 1991 and 2003. Data on preadmission NSAID use, other ulcer-related drugs, and comorbidity were likewise from population-based registries. Mortality was ascertained from the Civil Registration System. We compared 30-day mortality in NSAID users and nonusers while adjusting for age, gender, comorbidity, previous uncomplicated peptic ulcer, and ulcer medication use.

RESULTS

Of the 2,061 patients hospitalized with peptic ulcer perforation, 38% were current NSAID users. The 30-day mortality was 25% overall, and 35% among current NSAID users. Compared with never-use, the adjusted 30-day mortality rate ratios (MRRs) were 1.8 (95% CI 1.4-2.3) for current use of NSAIDs alone and 1.6 (95% CI 1.2-2.2) for current use combined with other ulcer-associated drugs. The mortality increase associated with the use of COX-2 inhibitors was similar to that of traditional NSAIDs: adjusted MRR for users of COX-2 inhibitors alone and in combination, 2.0 (1.3-3.1) and 1.4 (0.8-2.5), and for users of traditional NSAIDs alone or in combination, 1.7 (1.3-2.3) and 1.6 (1.2-2.3).

CONCLUSION

Current use of NSAIDs, including COX-2 inhibitors, is associated with a poor prognosis for patients hospitalized with peptic ulcer perforation.

Outcome of peptic ulcer bleeding among users of traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Few data exist on the impact of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use on peptic ulcer outcome.

AIM

To examine the 30-day mortality from peptic ulcer bleeding associated with the use of traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and newer selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors.

METHODS

Cohort study of patients with a first hospitalization for peptic ulcer bleeding in three Danish counties between 1991 and 2003. Data on pre-admission non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, use of other ulcer-related drugs and comorbidities were obtained from population-based registries. Follow-up data on mortality were obtained from the Danish Civil Registry System.

RESULTS

Of 7,232 patients hospitalized for peptic ulcer bleeding, 28% were current non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users. Thirty-day mortality was 11% overall, and 13% among current non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users. Compared with never-use, the adjusted 30-day mortality rate ratios were 1.4 (95% CI: 1.1-1.9) for current use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs alone and 1.3 (95% CI: 1.0-1.7) for current use combined with other ulcer-related drugs. For users of celecoxib, alone and in combination, adjusted mortality rate ratios were 1.4 (95% CI: 0.5-3.9) and 2.0 (95% CI: 1.2-3.5), and for users of rofecoxib, 1.2 (95% CI: 0.4-3.9) and 0.9 (95% CI: 0.5-1.6).

CONCLUSION

Among patients hospitalized with peptic ulcer bleeding, use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, including some newer cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, is associated with increased short-term mortality.

Neue Epidemiologie der akuten gastrointestinalen Blutung

Due to progress in general medicine and especially in gastroenterology, the incidence of acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage could be expected to have decreased during the last 25 years. However, published epidemiological data cannot, in general, fulfill this hope. The interpretation of potential trends is, however, often limited by low study quality. For example, questionable bleeding sources such as erosions in the upper gastrointestinal tract or colon diverticula are often rather uncritically named the definitive causes of bleeding. However, there is clear evidence of changes in grouping of patients. After the almost complete disappearance of Helicobacter pylori in younger indigenous populations of most industrialized countries, it is mostly elderly comorbid people with additional risk factors (NSAID use, low-dose aspirin, anticoagulation) who are affected. Not unexpectedly, this group has generally experienced no change in incidence and in fact shows a deterioration of prognosis in case of acute bleeding.