Randomized comparison between interscalene and costoclavicular blocks for arthroscopic shoulder surgery

Comparison of the lateral sagittal and costoclavicular approaches for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block in pediatric patients: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

The lateral sagittal brachial plexus block is the most used method for pediatric upper extremity surgery, whereas the applications of costoclavicular brachial plexus block are limited. This study aimed to compare the lateral sagittal and costoclavicular approaches for the ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Sixty pediatric patients aged 5...15 years undergoing hand or forearm surgery were randomly assigned to two groups. Group LS (n.ß=.ß30) received ultrasound-guided lateral sagittal block, and Group CC (n.ß=.ß30) received ultrasound-guided costoclavicular block. The block performing time, needling time, imaging time, needle visibility, number of passes, sensorial/motor block time, and postoperative pain scores were evaluated.

RESULTS

The needling time (82.90.ß...ß28.17 seconds vs. 64.77.ß...ß28.11 seconds respectively, p.ß=.ß0.004) and total block performance time (109.53 .. 29.75 seconds vs. 89.70 .. 29.98 seconds respectively, p.ß=.ß0.005) were significantly longer in Group LS than in Group CC. However, there was no significant difference between the groups in imaging time, needle visibility, number of passes, sensorial/motor block time, and postoperative pain scores (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Costoclavicular and lateral sagittal brachial plexus blocks resulted in similar anesthetics effects. Moreover, the costoclavicular method can be a better alternative to lateral sagittal as it has a shorter block performance time.

Opioid-free anesthesia with esketamine-dexmedetomidine versus opioid-based anesthesia with propofol-remifentanil in shoulder arthroscopy: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

OFA (Opioid-free anesthesia) has the potential to reduce the occurrence of opioid-related adverse events and enhance postoperative recovery. Our research aimed to investigate whether OFA, combining esketamine and dexmedetomidine, could serve as an alternative protocol to traditional OBA (opioid-based anesthesia) in shoulder arthroscopy, particularly in terms of reducing PONV (postoperative nausea and vomiting).

METHODS

A total of 60 patients treated with shoulder arthroscopy from September 2021 to September 2022 were recruited. Patients were randomly assigned to the OBA group (n = 30) and OFA group (n = 30), receiving propofol-remifentanil TIVA (total intravenous anesthesia) and esketamine-dexmedetomidine intravenous anesthesia, respectively. Both groups received ultrasound-guided ISBPB(interscalene brachial plexus block)for postoperative analgesia.

RESULTS

The incidence of PONV on the first postoperative day in the ward (13.3% vs. 40%, P < 0.05) was significantly lower in the OFA group than in the OBA group. Moreover, the severity of PONV was less severe in the OFA group than in the OBA group in PACU (post-anesthesia care unit) (0 [0, 0] vs. 0 [0, 3], P<0.05 ) and in the ward 24 h postoperatively ( 0 [0, 0] vs. 0 [0, 2.25], P<0.05). Additionally, the OFA group experienced a significantly shorter length of stay in the PACU compared to the OBA group (39.4 ± 6.76 min vs. 48.7 ± 7.90 min, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the OBA with propofol-remifentanil, the OFA with esketamine- dexmedetomidine proved to be feasible for shoulder arthroscopy, resulting in a reduced incidence of PONV and a shorter duration of stay in the PACU.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No: ChiCTR2100047355), 12/06/2021.

Comparing the clinical features of lateral and medial approaches of costoclavicular technique versus traditional lateral sagittal technique as infraclavicular brachial plexus block methods: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

It is aimed to compare the block onset times and performance features of costoclavicular techniques (medial and lateral approach) versus lateral sagittal technique.

METHODS

Patients were randomized into three groups. For costoclavicular techniques, ultrasound probe was placed parallel to clavicle obtaining nerve cords, axillary artery and axillary vein visual from lateral-to-medial, respectively. The block needle was advanced from lateral (Group CLB) or medial (Group CMB) to perform costoclavicular block. For lateral sagittal technique (Group LSB), ultrasound probe was placed sagittal and perpendicular below the coracoid process to obtain sagittal artery image with the cords around. Total 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine and 10 ml of 2% lidocaine were deposited for all groups. Sensory and motor block onset times, block performance properties, complications, and patient/surgeon satisfactions were investigated.

RESULTS

Among 56 patients, the primary outcome, sensory block onset time was shorter in Group CLB than Group CMB and Group LSB (10 [5-15], 10 [10-20], and 15 [10-15] minutes, respectively, p < 0.05). Motor block onset was also fastest in Group CLB (15 [10-20] mins for CLB, 20 [15-20] mins for LSB, and 22.5 [15-25] mins for CMB, p = 0.004). Block performance properties did not differ between the groups. The only complication observed was vascular puncture with an incidence of 28% in Group CMB.

CONCLUSIONS

Lateral approach costoclavicular technique provides fastest block onset than the other techniques. Considering the success and safety profile, this technique stands as a good alternative in clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study is prospectively registered to clinicaltrials.gov on 20/02/2022 (NCT05260736).

Anesthesia for the Patient Undergoing Shoulder Surgery

Shoulder surgery introduces important anesthesia considerations. The interscalene nerve block is considered the gold standard regional anesthetic technique and can serve as the primary anesthetic or can be used for postoperative analgesia. Phrenic nerve blockade is a limitation of the interscalene block and various phrenic-sparing strategies and techniques have been described. Patient positioning is another important anesthetic consideration and can be associated with significant hemodynamic effects and position-related injuries.

Effect of Neurostimulator Usage on Block Success in Costoclavicular Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The need of a neurostimulator for a successful nerve block was questioned in different block types after ultrasound had become standard.

AIM

To determine the effect of neurostimulator use on block success in the costoclavicular block (CCB).

METHODS

Sixty patients undergoing upper limb surgery were enrolled in the study. Patients using ultrasound and injection pressure manometer were divided as Group USP, and those using ultrasound, injection pressure manometer, and neurostimulator were divided as Group USPN. After block was applied, sensory and motor block levels were measured on a numeric scale. The block was considered successful when the desired score was reached or general anesthesia was not required intraoperatively. The number of successful and unsuccessful blocks for each group was summed up. The successful block rate was compared as the primary objective. Block application time, time to readiness for surgery, the number of needle passes, diaphragm paralysis rate, and complication rate were compared as secondary goals.

RESULTS

Block success rate was 90% (27/30) in Group USP and 96.7% (29/30) in Group USPN. There was no statistical difference in terms of block success rate. Block application time was significantly shorter in Group USP (207.2 ± 32.7 s) when compared to Group USPN (280.9 ± 70.1 s). Other secondary outcomes were similar.

CONCLUSION

Neurostimulator use did not affect block success in the CCB. Neurostimulator utilization prolonged block application time explicitly and did not change the complication rate. Ultrasound and injection pressure manometer are sufficient for a safe and successful CCB.

Infraclavicular versus costoclavicular approaches to ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The costoclavicular approach to brachial plexus block may have a more favorable anatomy than the classic infraclavicular approach. However, there are conflicting results in the literature regarding the comparative effectiveness of these two techniques.

METHODS

We systematically searched for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comparing costoclavicular with infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks for upper extremity surgeries on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Ovid. The outcomes of interest were sensory and motor block onset times, performance times, block failure, and complication rate. We performed statistical analyses using RevMan 5.4 and assessed heterogeneity using the Cochran Q test and I2 statistics. We appraised the risk of bias according to Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 tool.

RESULTS

We included 5 RCTs and 374 patients, of whom 189 (50.5%) were randomized to undergo costoclavicular block. We found no statistically significant differences between the two techniques regarding sensory block onset time in minutes (Mean Difference [MD = -0.39 min]; 95% CI -2.46 to 1.68 min; p = 0.71); motor block onset time in minutes (MD = -0.34 min; 95% CI -0.90 to 0.22 min; p = 0.23); performance time in minutes (MD = -0.12 min; 95% CI -0.89 to 0.64 min; p = 0.75); incidence of block failure (RR = 1.59; 95% CI 0.63 to 3.39; p = 0.63); and incidence of complications (RR = 0.60; 95% CI 0.20 to 1.84; p = 0.37).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggests that the CCV block may exhibit similar sensory and motor onset times when compared to the classic ICV approach in adults undergoing distal upper extremity surgery, with comparable rates of block failure and complications.

[Common and New Regional Anaesthesia Techniques Under Review - From Head to Abdomen]

By implementation of sonography regional anesthesia became more relevant in the daily practice of anesthesia and pain therapy. Due to visualized needle guidance ultrasound supports more safety during needle placement. Thereby new truncal blocks got enabled. Next to the blocking of specific nerve structures, plane blocks got established which can also be described as interfascial compartment blocks. The present review illustrates published and established blocks in daily practice concerning indications and the procedural issues. Moreover, the authors explain potential risks, complications and dosing of local anesthetics.

Neurological injury following peripheral nerve blocks: a narrative review of estimates of risks and the influence of ultrasound guidance

BACKGROUND

Peripheral nerve injury or post-block neurological dysfunction (PBND) are uncommon but a recognized complications of peripheral nerve blocks (PNB). A broad range of its incidence is noted in the literature and hence a critical appraisal of its occurrence is needed.

OBJECTIVE

In this review, we wanted to know the pooled estimates of PBND and further, determine its pooled estimates following various PNB over time. Additionally, we also sought to estimate the incidence of PBND with or without US guidance.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

A literature search was conducted in six databases. For the purposes of the review, we defined PBND as any new-onset sensorimotor disturbances in the distribution of the performed PNB either attributable to the PNB (when reported) or reported in the context of the PNB (when association with a PNB was not mentioned). Both prospective and retrospective studies which provided incidence of PBND at timepoints of interest (>48 hours to <2 weeks; >2 weeks to 6 weeks, 7 weeks to 5 months, 6 months to 1 year and >1 year durations) were included for review. Incidence data were used to provide pooled estimates (with 95% CI) of PBND at these time periods. Similar estimates were obtained to know the incidence of PBND with or without the use of US guidance. Additionally, PBND associated with individual PNB were obtained in a similar fashion with upper and lower limb PNB classified based on the anatomical location of needle insertion.

FINDINGS

The overall incidence of PBND decreased with time, with the incidence being approximately 1% at <2 weeks' time (Incidence per thousand (95% CI)= 9 (8; to 11)) to approximately 3/10 000 at 1 year (Incidence per thousand (95% CI)= 0. 3 (0.1; to 0.5)). Incidence of PBND differed for individual PNB with the highest incidence noted for interscalene block.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review adds information to existing literature that the neurological complications are rarer but seem to display a higher incidence for some blocks more than others. Use of US guidance may be associated with a lower incidence of PBND especially in those PNBs reporting a higher pooled estimates. Future studies need to standardize the reporting of PBND at various timepoints and its association to PNB.

Eighth Cervical Nerve Root Block During Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block Decreases Pain Caused by Posterior Portal Placement but Increases Horner Syndrome in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

To compare the intensity of pain on posterior portal placement between a C5-C7 root block (conventional interscalene brachial plexus block [ISBPB]) and a C5-C8 root block in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

METHODS

In this prospective, single-blinded, parallel-group randomized controlled trial, patients were randomized to receive either a C5-C7 root block (C5-C7 group, n = 37) or a C5-C8 root block (C5-C8 group, n = 36) with 25 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine. The primary outcome was the pain intensity on posterior portal placement, which was graded as 0 (no pain), 1 (mild pain), or 2 (severe pain). The secondary outcomes were the bilateral pupil diameters measured 30 minutes after ISBPB placement; the incidence of Horner syndrome, defined as a difference in pupil diameter (ipsilateral - contralateral) of less than -0.5 mm; the onset of postoperative pain; and the postoperative numerical rating pain score, where 0 and 10 represent no pain and the worst pain imaginable, respectively.

RESULTS

Fewer patients reported mild or severe pain on posterior portal placement in the C5-C8 group than in the C5-C7 group (9 of 36 [25.0%] vs 24 of 37 [64.9%], P = .003). Less pain on posterior portal placement was reported in the C5-C8 group than in the C5-C7 group (median [interquartile range], 0 [0-0.75] vs 1 [0-1]; median difference [95% confidence interval], 1 [0-1]; P = .001). The incidence of Horner syndrome was higher in the C5-C8 group than in the C5-C7 group (33 of 36 [91.7%] vs 22 of 37 [59.5%], P = .001). No significant differences in postoperative numerical rating pain scores and onset of postoperative pain were found between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A C5-C8 root block during an ISBPB reduces the pain intensity on posterior portal placement. However, it increases the incidence of Horner syndrome with no improvement in postoperative pain compared with the conventional ISBPB (C5-C7 root block).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, randomized controlled trial.

Comparison of ultrasonography-guided lateral versus medial costoclavicular brachial plexus block in pediatric patients : A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Costoclavicular brachial plexus block is gaining popularity due to its ease of application. Lateral and medial costoclavicular approaches have recently been defined. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the procedural execution of these approaches in the pediatric population.

METHODS

In this study 55 children aged between 2 and 10 years were randomized to receive lateral (LC group) or medial (MC group) costoclavicular brachial plexus block after induction of general anesthesia for postoperative analgesia. All patients received bupivacaine (1 mg/kg, 0.25%) within the center of the cord cluster. The number of needle maneuvers was recorded as primary outcome. Block performing features (ideal ultrasound-guided brachial plexus cords visualization, needle pathway planning time, needle tip and shaft visualization difficulty, requirement of extra needle maneuver due to insufficient local anesthetic distribution, block performance time, total procedure difficulty) and postoperative pain-related data (block intensities, pain scores and analgesic requirements) were all compared as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

The LC group patients required less ultrasound visualization time (median 14 s, range 11-23 s vs. median 42 s, range 15-67 s, p < 0.001) and fewer needle maneuvers (median 1, range 1-2 vs. median 3, range 2-4, p < 0.001) compared to the MC group. Similarly, the median block performance duration was shorter (median 67 s, range 47-94 s vs. median 140s, 90-204 s, p < 0.01) and procedures were perceived as easier (median 4, range 4-5 vs. median 3, range 2-5, p = 0.04) in the LC group. All other parameters were comparable (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The lateral approach required less needle maneuvers than the medial approach. Both techniques represented a good safety profile with favorable analgesic features.

Effect of local anesthetic volume (20 vs. 40 ml) on the analgesic efficacy of costoclavicular block in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Among the various diaphragm-sparing alternatives to interscalene block, costoclavicular block (CCB) demonstrated a low hemidiaphragmatic paresis (HDP) occurrence but an inconsistent analgesic effect in arthroscopic shoulder surgery. We hypothesized that a larger volume of local anesthetic for CCB could provide sufficient analgesia by achieving sufficient supraclavicular spreading.

METHODS

Sixty patients scheduled for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomly assigned to receive CCB using one of two volumes of local anesthetic (CCB20, 0.75% ropivacaine 20 ml; CCB40, 0.375% ropivacaine 40 ml). The primary outcome was the rate of complete analgesia (0 on the numeric rating scale of pain) at 1 h postoperatively. The secondary outcomes included a sonographic assessment of local anesthetic spread, diaphragmatic function, pulmonary function, postoperative opioid use, and other pain-related experiences within 24 h postoperatively.

RESULTS

The rates of complete analgesia were not significantly different (23.3% [7/30] and 33.3% [10/30] in the CCB20 and CCB40 groups, respectively; risk difference 10%, 95% CI [-13, 32], P = 0.567). There were no significant differences in other pain-related outcomes. Among the clinical factors considered, the only factor significantly associated with postoperative pain was the sonographic observation of supraclavicular spreading. There were no significant differences in the incidence of HDP and the change in pulmonary function between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Using 40 ml of local anesthetic does not guarantee supraclavicular spread during CCB. Moreover, it does not result in a higher rate of complete analgesia compared to using 20 ml of local anesthetic in arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

Perioperative Diaphragm Dysfunction

Diaphragm Dysfunction (DD) is a respiratory disorder with multiple causes. Although both unilateral and bilateral DD could ultimately lead to respiratory failure, the former is more common. Increasing research has recently delved into perioperative diaphragm protection. It has been established that DD promotes atelectasis development by affecting lung and chest wall mechanics. Diaphragm function must be specifically assessed for clinicians to optimally select an anesthetic approach, prepare for adequate monitoring, and implement the perioperative plan. Recent technological advancements, including dynamic MRI, ultrasound, and esophageal manometry, have critically aided disease diagnosis and management. In this context, it is noteworthy that therapeutic approaches for DD vary depending on its etiology and include various interventions, either noninvasive or invasive, aimed at promoting diaphragm recruitment. This review aims to unravel alternative anesthetic and operative strategies that minimize postoperative dysfunction by elucidating the identification of patients at a higher risk of DD and procedures that could cause postoperative DD, facilitating the recognition and avoidance of anesthetic and surgical interventions likely to impair diaphragmatic function.

Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Shoulder Dislocation in the Emergency Department: A Systemic Review

BACKGROUND

Shoulder dislocations are among the most common orthopedic emergencies encountered in the emergency department (ED). Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks (USG-PNBs) are increasingly being used for acute pain management in the ED, but clinical evidence supporting their utility for shoulder dislocation is limited and often conflicting.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review was to summarize and evaluate the utility of USG-PNB for analgesia during closed reduction of dislocated shoulders in the ED.

METHODS

Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic literature search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases was performed from database inception to September 2022. We included clinical studies examining USG-PNB for pain management of dislocated shoulders in the ED. Information collected from eligible studies included patient demographic characteristics, USG-PNB approach, alternate analgesia techniques, anesthetic regimens, clinical outcomes, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Five studies met inclusion criteria, all of which were randomized controlled trials comparing USG-PNB with procedural sedation and analgesia. Pooled patient satisfaction scores were similar for both analgesia methods (3.5 ± 0.6 vs. 3.9 ± 0.6 out of 5; p = 0.76). Patients managed with procedural sedation and analgesia achieved higher rates of overall shoulder reduction (100% vs. 67%; p < 0.001) and successful reduction on the first attempt (86% vs. 48%; p < 0.001). The USG-PNB groups in all but one study had shorter lengths of ED stay. Overall, USG-PNB was associated with a lower risk of adverse events and complications (3.9% vs. 24.9%; p < 0.001), especially adverse respiratory events (0% vs. 14.7%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

USG-PNBs performed by adequately trained emergency physicians should be considered a safe and effective alternative for analgesia during closed reduction of dislocated shoulders in the ED, particularly in patients with cardiorespiratory comorbidities.

Regional anesthesia for geriatric population

Advancements in modern health care over 20 years have substantially increased the average lifespan in developed countries, and the fastest growing population is the elderly population. The proportion of people in Saudi Arabia aged 60 or more is predicted to be 25 percent of the total population of 40 million by the end of 2050. Moreover, the number of people aged 80 or more is expected to reach 1.6 million or 4 percent of the total population in the same period. Improvements in surgical techniques, anesthesia, and intensive care units make surgical interventions in older and sicker patients possible. It is estimated that over half of the population older than 65 years will require surgical intervention at least once during the remainder of their lives. Therefore, elderly patients are becoming an even larger part of anesthetic practice. Regional anesthesia (RA) is frequently used in elderly patients, especially during orthopedic surgery, genitourologic and gynecologic procedures, and hernia repair. Although age can no longer be considered a contraindication to anesthesia and surgery, anesthesia-related morbidity and mortality remain higher among elderly than among young adult surgical patients. Undoubtedly, peripheral nerve (PN) blocks improve analgesia and reduce opioid consumption and their associated side effects. This is beneficial in the perioperative care of elderly patients who may have less physiologic reserve to withstand the side effects of general anesthesia (GA).

Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis after costoclavicular approach versus other brachial plexus blocks in upper limb surgery: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The costoclavicular brachial plexus block (CCB) is a recently established technique that uses the infraclavicular approach and is performed just below the clavicle. This meta-analysis aimed to determine whether CCB can reduce the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (HDP), which is a major adverse event related to brachial plexus block (BPB), while yielding comparable block performance as other BPB techniques.

METHODS

We searched electronic databases to identify relevant studies that compared the incidence of HDP between CCB and other BPB techniques. The primary outcome was the incidence of HDP following CCB and other BPB techniques. The secondary outcomes were pulmonary function test results, other adverse events, and block performance parameters such as onset and performance time.

RESULTS

We included six randomized controlled trials that included 414 patients. Compared with the other BPB group, the CCB group had a significantly lower incidence of HDP (relative ratio: 0.21, 95% CI [0.12, 0.36], P < 0.001) and higher peak expiratory flow rate (mean difference: 0.68 L/s, 95% CI [0.13, 1.23], P = 0.015). There were no significant between-group differences with respect to other adverse events and block performance parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with other BPB techniques, CCB involves a lower incidence of HDP with comparable onset and performance time.

Effects of the costoclavicular block versus interscalene block in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery under monitored anesthesia care: a randomized, prospective, non-inferiority study

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have reported that costoclavicular blocks (CCBs) can consistently block almost all branches of the brachial plexus while sparing the phrenic nerve and provide effective analgesia after shoulder surgery. We aimed to compare the efficacy of the CCB with that of the interscalene block (ISB) as the sole blocking technique for shoulder surgery.

METHODS

A total of 212 patients undergoing elective arthroscopic shoulder surgery were randomized to receive an ISB or CCB based on a non-inferiority design. All patients received titration sedation with propofol under monitored anesthesia during surgery. The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients with complete motor blockade of the suprascapular nerve (SSN) and incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (HDP). The secondary outcomes included block-related variables, complications, and postoperative pain scores.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients with complete motor blockade of the SSN at 20 min between the CCB and ISB groups (53% vs. 66%) exceeded the predefined non-inferiority margin of -5%, but was comparable at 30 min (87% vs. 91%). The CCB resulted in a significantly lower incidence of HDP (7.55% vs. 92.45%), Horner's syndrome (0% vs. 18.87%), and dyspnea (0% vs. 10.38%) than the ISB. None of the patients experienced failed blocks or required conversion to general anesthesia. Pain scores were comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided CCBs may be comparable to ISBs, with fewer unfavorable complications in patients with impaired lung function undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block at the clavicle level: A review

The supraclavicular block (SCB) and the infraclavicular block (ICB) are introduced to meet upper extremity surgery, where the transducer or the insertion point is placed superiorly and inferiorly at the approximate midpoint of the clavicle, respectively. These two approaches are highly appealing since they clearly exhibited each cord and its associated anatomy. In addition, it directed the needle accurately with real-time imaging by ultrasound guidance. Therefore, it brought higher success rates and fewer complications. Numerous trials have recently been conducted to examine the SCB and ICB regarding the new approach, injection techniques, block dynamics, and complication of hemidiaphragmatic paresis. It was found that both approaches could improve block effectiveness and postoperative analgesia for upper extremity surgery, according to recent studies at the level of the clavicular brachial plexus block. However, there is still a lack of work comparing the clinical performance and effectiveness of both approaches with ultrasonography. This review aims to outline the current available data from clinical trials along with case reports about these two approaches and to describe the findings published in the literature during the previous 5 years. Based on these findings, we attempt to determine whether there exists a one-size-fits-all approach that has the potential to meet upper extremity surgery.

Combined Intermediate Cervical Plexus and Costoclavicular Block for Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Prospective Feasibility Study

A combined cervical plexus and costoclavicular block provides effective shoulder analgesia without the risk of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis. However, whether this technique can also provide effective anesthesia for shoulder surgery remains unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the feasibility and adverse effects of combined blocks in arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Fifty patients scheduled for arthroscopic shoulder surgery were prospectively enrolled. Intermediate cervical plexus (5 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine) and costoclavicular (20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine) blocks were administered under ultrasound guidance. The block procedure time, needle pass, patient discomfort, anesthesia quality, onset time, postoperative analgesia quality, adverse events, and patient satisfaction were assessed. Surgical and block success were achieved in 45 (90%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 78-97%) and 44 (88%; 95% CI, 76-95%) patients, respectively. Three patients required local anesthetic supplementation, and two required general anesthesia. The incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis was 12.0% (95% CI, 4.5-24.3%). Postoperative pain control was effective for the first 24 h postoperative. Neurological deficits were not observed. The patients reported a high level of satisfaction. This study revealed that a combined cervical plexus and costoclavicular block provided effective surgical anesthesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgery with a 12% incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis. Further randomized studies comparing this technique with interscalene block are required.

Regional Anesthesia Techniques for Shoulder Surgery in High-Risk Pulmonary Patients

Patients with pre-existing pulmonary conditions are at risk for experiencing perioperative complications and increased morbidity. General anesthesia has historically been used for shoulder surgery, though regional anesthesia techniques are increasingly used to provide anesthesia and improved pain control after surgery. Relative to regional anesthesia, patients who undergo general anesthesia may be more prone to risks of barotrauma, postoperative hypoxemia, and pneumonia. High-risk pulmonary patients, in particular, may be exposed to these risks of general anesthesia. Traditional regional anesthesia techniques for shoulder surgery are associated with high rates of phrenic nerve paralysis which significantly impairs pulmonary function. Newer regional anesthesia techniques have been developed, however, that provide effective analgesia and surgical anesthesia while having much lower rates of phrenic nerve paralysis, thereby preserving pulmonary function.

Comparison of pulmonary function during interscalene block vs. supraclavicular block: a single-center, double-blind, randomized trial

BACKROUND

The supraclavicular plexus block (SCB) and interscalene plexus block (ISB) have the potential to pulmonary function, the duration of the potential remains uncertain. So, we compared the effect of SCB and ISB on pulmonary function, especially the duration time.

METHODS

Ninety-six patients were finally allocated to group I and group S. The ISB and the SCB procedures were performed with ultrasound guidance before anesthesia induction. An investigator recorded the diaphragm mobility and respiratory function test indicators before the block (T₀) and at 30 min (T_{30 min}), 4 h (T₄), 8 h (T₈), and 12 h (T₁₂) after the block. The diaphragmatic paralysis rate was calculated for above timepoint. The VAS, the recovery time for the sensory and motor block, and adverse reactions within 24 h of administering the block were also recorded.

RESULTS

The recovery times of diaphragm mobility in group I were longer than those in group S. Compared with group I, group S had a significantly lower diaphragmatic paralysis rate during eupnea breathing at T_{30 min} and T₈ after the block. Similarly, group S had a significantly lower diaphragmatic paralysis rate at deep breathing at T_{30 min}, T_8, and T₁₂ after the block. The recovery times of FEV₁ and FVC in group I were longer than those in group S. The other results were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided ISB resulted in a longer periods with a suppressive effect on pulmonary function than SCB.

TRIALS REGISTRATION

17/12/2019, ChiCTR1900028286.

Recent advancements in regional anaesthesia

Patient safety, improved quality of care, and better patient satisfaction and functional outcomes are currently the topmost priorities in regional anaesthesia (RA) and all advancements in RA move in this direction. Ultrasonography-guided central neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks, intracluster and intratruncal injections, fascial plane blocks, diaphragm-sparing blocks, use of continuous nerve block techniques, and continuous local anaesthetic wound infiltration catheters are now topics of popular clinical interest. The safety and efficacy of nerve blocks can be improved with the help of injection pressure monitoring and the incorporation of advanced technology in the ultrasound machine and needles. Novel procedure-specific and motor-sparing nerve blocks have come up. The anaesthesiologist of the current era, with a good understanding of the sonoanatomy of the target area and the microarchitecture of nerves, along with the backup of advanced technology, can be very successful in performing RA techniques. RA is rapidly evolving and revolutionising the practice of anaesthesia.

Costoclavicular brachial plexus block: A review of current evidence

The brachial plexus block can be performed through several approaches. The recently described ultrasound-guided costoclavicular block at the costoclavicular space has gained popularity, presenting promising results for upper limb anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia. This block comes as an alternative to the traditional infraclavicular approach, with results suggesting improved block quality and reduced risk of complications. This article presents a narrative review of the literature and the current evidence available. A bibliographic search was conducted in the database PubMed and relevant articles published between 2015 and December 2020 to this topic were selected.

What Is the Risk of Postoperative Neurologic Symptoms After Regional Anesthesia in Upper Extremity Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

BACKGROUND

The risk of neurologic symptoms after regional anesthesia in orthopaedic surgery is estimated to approach 3%, with long-term deficits affecting 2 to 4 per 10,000 patients. However, current estimates are derived from large retrospective or observational studies that are subject to important systemic biases. Therefore, to harness the highest quality data and overcome the challenge of small numbers of participants in individual randomized trials, we undertook this systematic review and meta-analysis of contemporary randomized trials.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials we asked: (1) What is the aggregate pessimistic and optimistic risk of postoperative neurologic symptoms after regional anesthesia in upper extremity surgery? (2) What block locations have the highest and lowest risk of postoperative neurologic symptoms? (3) What is the timing of occurrence of postoperative neurologic symptoms (in days) after surgery?

METHODS

We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2008 and 2019 that prospectively evaluated postoperative neurologic symptoms after peripheral nerve blocks in operative procedures. Based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation guidance for using the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions tool, most trials registered a global rating of a low-to-intermediate risk of bias. A total of 12,532 participants in 143 trials were analyzed. Data were pooled and interpreted using two approaches to calculate the aggregate risk of postoperative neurologic symptoms: first according to the occurrence of each neurologic symptom, such that all reported symptoms were considered mutually exclusive (pessimistic estimate), and second according to the occurrence of any neurologic symptom for each participant, such that all reported symptoms were considered mutually inclusive (optimistic estimate).

RESULTS

At any time postoperatively, the aggregate pessimistic and optimistic risks of postoperative neurologic symptoms were 7% (915 of 12,532 [95% CI 7% to 8%]) and 6% (775 of 12,532 [95% CI 6% to 7%]), respectively. Interscalene block was associated with the highest risk (13% [661 of 5101] [95% CI 12% to 14%]) and axillary block the lowest (3% [88 of 3026] [95% CI 2% to 4%]). Of all symptom occurrences, 73% (724 of 998) were reported between 0 and 7 days, 24% (243 of 998) between 7 and 90 days, and 3% (30 of 998) between 90 and 180 days. Among the 31 occurrences reported at 90 days or beyond, all involved sensory deficits and four involved motor deficits, three of which ultimately resolved.

CONCLUSION

When assessed prospectively in randomized trials, the aggregate risk of postoperative neurologic symptoms associated with peripheral nerve block in upper extremity surgery was approximately 7%, which is greater than previous estimates described in large retrospective and observational trials. Most occurrences were reported within the first week and were associated with an interscalene block. Few occurrences were reported after 90 days, and they primarily involved sensory deficits. Although these findings cannot inform causation, they can help inform risk discussions and clinical decisions, as well as bolster our understanding of the evolution of postoperative neurologic symptoms after regional anesthesia in upper extremity surgery. Future prospective trials examining the risks of neurologic symptoms should aim to standardize descriptions of symptoms, timing of evaluation, classification of severity, and diagnostic methods.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

Comparison of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and costoclavicular brachial plexus blocks in pediatric patients: a randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

Costoclavicular brachial plexus block has been described recently as a new technique in adults and pediatric patients. In this study, we aimed to compare the supraclavicular and costoclavicular approaches, which are claimed to be effective and practical in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Sixty children were randomized to receive supraclavicular (SC group) or costoclavicular (CC group) brachial plexus blocks prior to surgical incision. Block performance times were recorded as the primary outcome. Procedural features (ideal brachial plexus cord visualization/needle pathway planning time, needle tip/shaft visualization difficulty, number of needle maneuvers, requirement of extra needle maneuvers due to insufficient local anesthetic distribution) and postoperative pain-related data (sensorimotor block intensities, Wong-Baker and FLACC pain scores and analgesic requirements) were also evaluated. To observe the tendency toward respiratory complications, ultrasonographic diaphragm movement amplitude (with M-mode) and diaphragm thickness (with B-mode) were measured postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients were included. Block performance times [70(7-97) vs. 115(75-180) s] were significantly lower in the CC group (p < 0.01). The block success rates did not differ (p > 0.05). The incidence of hemidiaphragm paralysis was 44% in the SC group (p < 0.001), and inspiratory diaphragm thickness was significantly lower (p < 0.01). None of CC group patients experienced hemidiaphragm paralysis. All other parameters were comparable (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although costoclavicular block did not show superiority in pain management, the block performance was perceived as more practical than supraclavicular block. We believe that costoclavicular brachial plexus block stands as a good option in upper extremity surgeries with the advantages of shorter block performance time and reduced ipsilateral hemidiaphragm paralysis risk in pediatric patients.

The Minimum Effective Analgesic Volume of 0.5% Bupivacaine for Ultrasound-Guided Anterior Suprascapular Nerve Block

Objective The interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBB) constitutes the gold standard for analgesia after shoulder procedures. Ipsilateral phrenic nerve block remains the most common adverse effect after ISBB. Alternative nerve blocks are performed in shoulder surgery in order to prevent hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis (HDP). The purpose of the present study was to investigate the minimum effective local anesthetic volume of 0.5% bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia with an anterior suprascapular nerve block (ASSB). The secondary aim was to investigate diaphragm functions with the local anesthetic doses used while conducting effective volume research. Method This prospective observational study was conducted at the American Hospital of Istanbul, Turkey, from March to July 2022. The initial injected volume of 0.5% bupivacaine was 10 ml. Our clinical experience indicates that this yields a complete sensory block of the anterior suprascapular nerve. In accordance with the up-and-down method, the volume of 0.5% bupivacaine used for a particular patient was determined by the outcome of the preceding block, which represented block success. In case of effective ASSB being achieved, the volume of 0.5% bupivacaine to be administered to the next patient was lowered by 1 ml. In case of block failure, however, the volume of 0.5% bupivacaine to be applied in the subsequent case was increased by 1 ml. Ipsilateral hemi-diaphragmatic movement measurements were taken before (baseline) and 30 minutes after the block. General anesthesia was induced 60 minutes after the completion of the block performance by means of a standardized protocol. Results Sixty-seven patients were included in the study. The ED50 and ED95 calculated for anterior suprascapular nerve block using probit transformation and logistic regression analysis were 2.646 (95% CI, 0.877-2.890) and 3.043 ml (95% CI, 2.771-4.065), respectively. When complete paralysis was defined as 75% or above, partial paralysis as 25-50%, and no paralysis as 25% or less, volumes of 6 ml or lower appeared to cause no paralysis for the anterior suprascapular nerve block. Conclusion We, therefore, recommend using a volume of 6 ml or less in order to achieve diaphragm-sparing features for anterior suprascapular nerve blocks.

Ultrasound-guided selective trunk block: Evaluation of ipsilateral sensorimotor block dynamics, hemidiaphragmatic function and efficacy for upper extremity surgery. A single-centre cohort study

BACKGROUND

Selectively locating and blocking the individual trunks of the brachial plexus with small volumes of local anaesthetic, a selective trunk block (SeTB), may produce anaesthesia of the entire upper extremity except for the T2 dermatome.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of an ultrasound-guided (USG) SeTB on ipsilateral sensorimotor block dynamics, hemidiaphragmatic function, and efficacy as an all-purpose regional anaesthetic technique for upper extremity surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single-centre, university hospital in Hong Kong, China from February 2021 to July 2021.

PATIENTS

Thirty patients (aged 53.2 ± 14.8 years and BMI 23.8 ± 3.6 kg m - 2 ), ASA physical status I to III, scheduled for upper extremity surgery under a brachial plexus block.

INTERVENTIONS

USG SeTB with 25 ml (7, 8 and 10 ml to the superior, middle and inferior trunks, respectively) of a 1 : 1 mixture of 2% lidocaine with 1 : 200 000 epinephrine and 0.5% levobupivacaine.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Ipsilateral sensorimotor blockade of the suprascapular (only motor), axillary, radial, ulnar, median and musculocutaneous nerves were assessed at regular intervals for 45 min. Ipsilateral hemidiaphragmatic excursion was also measured, at 30 min after the SeTB, using M-mode ultrasound. The SeTB was considered a success if it was possible to complete surgery without any rescue analgesia or conversion to general anaesthesia.

RESULTS

Complete motor blockade of the suprascapular nerve was achieved in median [range] 5 [5 to 15] min. Complete sensory and motor blockade were achieved in all the other 5 nerves in 17.5 [10 to 30] and 15 [10 to 30] min respectively. The SeTB was successful in 93% and ipsilateral hemidiaphragmatic paresis (HDP) was present in 82%, of patients.

CONCLUSION

SeTB produces sensorimotor blockade of the entire upper extremity, causes ipsilateral HDP, and is effective as the sole anaesthetic for surgery from the proximal humerus to the hand.

TRIAL REGISTRION

ClinicalTrials.gov, Trial Registration No: NCT04752410, Date submitted for Registration: 09 February 2021, Date first posted: 12 February 2021, Dates of patient enrolment: 19 February 2021 to 27 July 2021 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04752410 ).

Randomised comparison between superior trunk and costoclavicular blocks for arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A noninferiority study

BACKGROUND

Superior trunk block (STB) provides noninferior analgesia to the interscalene block and reduces the risk of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (HDP). Recently, supraclavicular spreading has also been shown to occur during costoclavicular block (CCB), presenting as an alternative analgesic technique for shoulder surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in postoperative pain scores and HDP incidence between STB and CCB.

DESIGN

Prospective randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Chungnam National University Hospital in Daejeon from January to July 2021.

PATIENTS

Seventy patients, aged 20 to 70 years with ASA Physical Status classifications I to III and scheduled for elective arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were recruited.

INTERVENTION

Ultrasound-guided STB or CCB was performed with 20 ml 0.5% ropivacaine.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the pain score (numeric rating scale, NRS) at 1 h postsurgery. A 1.4 (NRS) noninferiority margin was set a priori . The incidence of HDP, postoperative change of pulmonary function and postoperative opioid use were included as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

The pain score was higher in the CCB group compared with the STB group at 1 h postoperatively (median difference, 2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1 to 3; noninferiority was not demonstrated). Two patients in the CCB group received a rescue interscalene block due to severe postoperative pain. The incidence of complete HDP was lower in the CCB group (risk difference, -26%; 95% CI, -6 to -45%; P  < 0.001). The median reduction in forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s were also significantly lower in the CCB group.

CONCLUSION

Although the incidence of HDP was lower, CCB did not show noninferiority in immediate postoperative analgesia compared with STB in arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trial Registry of Korea (KCT0005822, principal investigator: Boohwi Hong) on 25 January 2021 ( https://cris.nih.go.kr ).

A randomised controlled trial in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery comparing interscalene block with either 10 ml or 20 ml levobupivacaine 0.25

The interscalene brachial plexus block is recommended for analgesia after shoulder surgery but it may cause hemidiaphragmatic dysfunction. We tested whether ipsilateral hemidiaphragmatic contraction was better after a smaller dose of local anaesthetic without impairing analgesic effect. We randomly allocated 48 adults to 10 ml or 20 ml levobupivacaine 0.25% before arthroscopic shoulder surgery. The primary outcome was hemidiaphragmatic paralysis, defined as inspiratory thickness < 1.2 times expiratory thickness, measured by ultrasound 4 h after block. Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis was recorded for 6/24 vs. 23/24 supine participants after 10 ml vs. 20 ml levobupivacaine 0.25%, respectively, and for 4/24 vs. 23/24 sitting participants, respectively, p < 0.001 for both. Pain scores after 10 ml injectate were not worse than after 20 ml injectate. Median (IQR [range]) morphine doses in the first 24 postoperative hours after 10 ml and 20 ml levobupivacaine 0.25% were 2 (0-6 [0-23]) mg vs. 1 (0-2 [0-11]) mg, respectively, p = 0.12. No participant had a complication after 10 ml interscalene levobupivacaine, whereas seven had complications after 20 ml levobupivacaine, p = 0.009. Hemidiaphragmatic function was better after 10 ml vs. 20 ml interscalene levobupivacaine 0.25% without impairing analgesia for 24 postoperative hours.

Network Meta-Analysis of Perioperative Analgesic Effects of Different Interventions on Postoperative Pain After Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery Based on Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

Shoulder arthroscopic surgery is a common surgical method used in orthopedics. However, severe postoperative pain can significantly limit the early joint movement of patients and adversely affect the impact of the surgery. At present, there is no consistent and effective analgesic scheme for the management of postoperative pain after arthroscopic surgery of the shoulder.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to search for the most effective analgesic scheme to control pain in the perioperative period of arthroscopic surgery of the shoulder.

Study Design

Network meta-analysis.

Methods

We searched 5 different databases (i.e., Medline, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) from January 2011 to January 2021 for English literature. Thereafter, we sifted out randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which compared different intervention schemes for pain management after shoulder arthroscopy and selected only 12 h, 24 h, or 48 h after the patient leaves the operating room as an optimal period for administration of analgesic intervention schemes. Only patients with shoulder disease who have undergone arthroscopic shoulder surgery were included in this study. The Cochrane “risk of bias” was used for the quality assessment. Moreover, some additional tests were performed to enhance the credibility of the results.

Results

Twenty-nine RCTs involving 1,885 patients were included in this frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA). These articles mainly were divided into two distinct groups, namely, the nerve block group and the non-nerve block group. Regarding the nerve block group, at postoperative 12 h, the intervention suprascapular nerve block + interscalene nerve block (SSNB + INB) was ranked first, whereas INB + intra-articular injection (INB + IAI) was ranked first at 24 h and 48 h postoperation. In the non-nerve block group, external application (EA) was ranked first at postoperative 12 h, but oral administration (OA) exhibited a better analgesic effect at postoperative 24 h and postoperative 48 h.

Conclusion

We conclude that the analgesic effect of SSNB+INB was the best at postoperative 12 h, and INB+IAI was the best at postoperative 24 h and 48 h in the nerve block group. For the non-nerve block group, the effect of EA was the best at postoperative 12 h, and the analgesic effect of OA at postoperative 24 h and 48 h was significantly better than any other interventions.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42021286777.

Postoperative neurologic symptoms in the operative arm after shoulder surgery with interscalene blockade: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative neurologic symptoms (PONS) in the operative arm are important complications of shoulder surgery and interscalene blockade (ISB). This systematic review aimed to compare the risk of PONS between ISB and other techniques, and the relative safety of different agents used in ISB.

METHODS

Our systematic review followed Cochrane review methodology and was registered in PROSPERO. A search of MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), and CENTRAL (Wiley) from inception to June 2020 was completed. We included randomized or quasi-randomized trials of patients (> five years old) undergoing shoulder surgery with any ISB technique as an intervention, compared with any other nonregional or regional technique, or ISB of alternate composition or technique. The primary outcome was PONS (study author defined) assessed a minimum of one week after surgery.

RESULTS

Fifty-five studies totalling 6,236 participants (median, 69; range, 30-910) were included. Another 422 otherwise eligible trials were excluded because PONS was not reported. Heterogeneity in when PONS was assessed (from one week to one year) and the diagnostic criteria used precluded quantitative meta-analysis. The most common PONS definition, consisting of one or more of paresthesia, sensory deficit, or motor deficit, was only used in 16/55 (29%) trials. Risk of bias was low in 5/55 (9%) trials and high in 36/55 (65%) trials, further limiting any inferences.

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight the need for a standardized PONS outcome definition and follow-up time, along with routine, rigorous measurement of PONS in trials of ISB.

STUDY REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42020148496); registered 10 February 2020.

Anesthesia for the Patient Undergoing Shoulder Surgery

Shoulder surgery introduces important anesthesia considerations. The interscalene nerve block is considered the gold standard regional anesthetic technique and can serve as the primary anesthetic or can be used for postoperative analgesia. Phrenic nerve blockade is a limitation of the interscalene block and various phrenic-sparing strategies and techniques have been described. Patient positioning is another important anesthetic consideration and can be associated with significant hemodynamic effects and position-related injuries.

Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis following costoclavicular versus supraclavicular brachial plexus block: a randomized controlled trial

Costoclavicular brachial plexus block is emerging as a promising infraclavicular approach performed just below the clavicle. However, there are relatively little data regarding the hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (HDP) compared to the commonly performed supraclavicular block. We hypothesized that the incidence of HDP in costoclavicular block is lower than supraclavicular block like classical infraclavicular approach. Eighty patients were randomly assigned to ultrasound-guided supraclavicular (group S) or costoclavicular (group C) block with 25 mL of local anesthetics (1:1 mixture of 1% lidocaine and 0.75% ropivacaine). The primary outcome was the incidence of HDP, defined as less than 20% of fractional change in the diaphragm thickness on ultrasound M-mode. Also, pulmonary function test and chest radiograph were assessed before and after the surgery. The incidence of HDP was 4/35 (11.4%) in the group C and 19/40 (47.5%) in the group S (risk difference, − 36%; 95% CI − 54 to − 17%; P = 0.002). The mean (SD) change of DTF values were 30.3% (44.0) and 56.9% (39.3) in the group C and S, respectively (difference in means, − 26.6%; 95% CI − 45.8 to − 7.4%; P = 0.007). The pulmonary function was more preserved in group C than in group S. The determined diagnostic cut off value of the diaphragm elevation on chest radiograph was 29 mm. Despite the very contiguous location of the two approaches around the clavicle, costoclavicular block can significantly reduce the risk of HDP compared with supraclavicular block.

Perioperative anaesthetic considerations for rotator cuff repair surgeries: A current concept review

Surgeries for Rotator Cuff (RC) pathologies are required for either trauma or degenerative related aetiologies. Various surgical techniques from open to arthroscopic repair, are being undertaken by orthopaedic surgeons. Peri-operative anaesthetic management of the patients undergoing rotator cuff repair requires understanding the surgical procedure and patient status for optimal anaesthetic planning. Such management mandates a thorough pre-operative evaluation, including clinical history, examination, and relevant investigations. Patients with acute trauma associated Rotator Cuff (RC) tears should be assessed for visceral injuries using appropriate injury evaluation systems before such repairs. On the other hand, patients with degenerative tears tend to be older with associated comorbidities. Hence pre-operative optimisation is necessary according to risk stratification. Anaesthetic techniques for Rotator Cuff (RC) surgery include general anaesthesia or regional anaesthesia. These are individualised according to patient assessment and surgical procedure planned. Knowledge of relevant surgical anatomy is essential for intra-operative, and post-operative neural blockade techniques since optimal peri-operative analgesia improve overall patient recovery. The occurrence of a peri-operative complication should be recognised as timely management improves the patient-related surgical outcomes. We describe the relevance of surgical anatomy, the effect of patient positioning, irrigating fluids, various anaesthetic techniques and an overview of regional and medical interventions to manage pain in patients undergoing for Rotator Cuff (RC) surgery.

Critical structures in the needle path of the costoclavicular brachial plexus block: a cadaver study

PURPOSE

The costoclavicular block is a relatively novel alternative to the infraclavicular block. We aimed to determine the anatomical structures vulnerable to needle injury during a costoclavicular block.

METHODS

The needle path consistent with a costoclavicular block approach was performed bilaterally on four lightly embalmed cadavers using ultrasound guidance. Careful dissection was performed with 18-G Tuohy needles in situ and photographs were taken.

RESULTS

The needle penetrated the deltoid in six of eight cases and the pectoralis minor in three of eight cases. The subclavius tendon or its fascia were punctured in two of eight cases. The lateral cord was in contact with the needle in six procedures and punctured in three. The posterior cord was contacted in two instances, and the medial cord in one. In a single dissection, the needle was in contact with the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve. The needle was close to the medial brachial cutaneous nerve in one case and close to the pectoral nerves in two of eight cases. While the cephalic vein and thoracoacromial artery were consistently nearby, there were no cases of vascular puncture.

CONCLUSION

We found that the needle path may be close to the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve, medial brachial cutaneous nerve, and pectoral nerves but did not traverse any critical structures aside from the lateral cord. This suggests relative safety when compared with other approaches to the infraclavicular brachial plexus. Structures dans la trajectoire de l'aiguille du bloc de plexus brachial costoclaviculaire : une étude cadavérique.

Evaluating the spread of costoclavicular brachial plexus block: an anatomical study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The costoclavicular brachial plexus block is performed deep and posterior to the midpoint of the clavicle. There are limited data evaluating the spread of the costoclavicular brachial plexus block. We performed a cadaveric study to evaluate the spread of injectate after a costoclavicular brachial plexus block.

METHODS

Five ultrasound-guided costoclavicular block injections were performed with 20 mL of 0.1% methylene blue. The brachial plexus and its branches were dissected from the level of C4 to the lower axilla. The extent of dye spread was recorded including spread to the phrenic nerve, suprascapular nerve, roots, trunks, divisions, cords and terminal branches of the brachial plexus.

RESULTS

The dye extended cephalad to the level of the cricoid cartilage in two of the five injections; three injections had dye extending 0.75 cm, 1.5 cm and 2 cm caudad to the level of the cricoid cartilage, respectively. The C7, C8 and T1 nerve roots were stained in all injections. The dye did not extend cephalad to the C5 and C6 nerve roots. All trunks, cords and divisions of the brachial plexus were stained, as was the suprascapular nerve. There was no spread of dye to the phrenic nerve in any of the specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

This cadaveric study demonstrates that ultrasound-guided injection in the costoclavicular space spreads cephalad to the brachial plexus in the supraclavicular space, consistently reaching the suprascapular nerve and all trunks and cords of the brachial plexus, while sparing the phrenic nerve.

Does the Serratus Plane Block Added to the Interscalene Block Improve the Quality of Anesthesia in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery? A Prospective Randomized Study

Background: Interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB) is the gold standard method in shoulder surgery. Serratus plane block (SPB) provides anesthesia in hemithorax, axillary region, and posterior of the shoulder. This randomized controlled study evaluated the effect of SPB added to ISBPB on surgical anesthesia quality in arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

Methods: Sixty patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery were randomly assigned to two groups. All surgeries were performed under regional anesthesia. The Group I (Group Interscalene) (n=30) received ultrasound-guided interscalene block. In the Group IS (Group Interscalene + Serratus) (n=30), ultrasound-guided interscalene block and SPB were performed. Intraoperative anesthetic agent consumption, postoperative opioid consumption, postoperative pain scores, patient satisfaction, and surgeon satisfaction were evaluated.

Results: Intraoperative propofol (60.00 ± 45.49 vs. 24.00 ± 32.97, respectively) and fentanyl (33.33 ± 23.97 vs. 18.33 ± 24.51, respectively) consumption were significantly higher in Group I than in Group IS (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups at any of the times the postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores were evaluated (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: SPB added to the ISBPB increases the quality of surgical anesthesia and reduces the need for intraoperative sedoanalgesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

Costoclavicular brachial plexus block reduces hemidiaphragmatic paralysis more than supraclavicular brachial plexus block: retrospective, propensity score matched cohort study

Background

Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis, a frequent complication of the brachial plexus block performed above the clavicle, is rarely associated with an infraclavicular approach. The costoclavicular brachial plexus block is emerging as a promising infraclavicular approach. However, it may increase the risk of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis because the proximity to the phrenic nerve is greater than in the classical infraclavicular approach.

Methods

This retrospective analysis compared the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis in patients undergoing costoclavicular and supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks. Of 315 patients who underwent brachial plexus block performed by a single anesthesiologist, 118 underwent costoclavicular, and 197 underwent supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Propensity score matching selected 118 pairs of patients. The primary outcome was the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis, defined as a postoperative elevation of the hemidiaphragm > 20 mm. Factors affecting the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis were also evaluated.

Results

Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis was observed in three patients (2.5%) who underwent costoclavicular and 47 (39.8%) who underwent supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks (P < 0.001; odds ratio, 0.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.13). Both the brachial plexus block approach and the injected volume of local anesthetic were significantly associated with hemidiaphragmatic paralysis.

Conclusions

The incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis is significantly lower with costoclavicular than with supraclavicular brachial plexus block.

Diaphragm-sparing nerve blocks for shoulder surgery, revisited

Although interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) remains the gold standard for analgesia after shoulder surgery, the inherent risks of ipsilateral phrenic nerve block and hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (HDP) limit its use in patients with preexisting pulmonary compromise. In a previous Daring Discourse (2017), our research team has identified potential diaphragm-sparing alternatives to ISB for patients undergoing shoulder surgery. In recent years, the field has been fertile with research, with the publication of multiple randomized controlled trials investigating supraclavicular blocks, upper trunk blocks, anterior suprascapular nerve blocks, costoclavicular blocks, and combined infraclavicular-suprascapular blocks. To date, the cumulative evidence (pre-2017 and post-2017) suggests that costoclavicular blocks may provide similar postoperative analgesia to ISB coupled with a 0%-incidence of HDP. However, in light of the small number of patients recruited by the single study investigating costoclavicular blocks, further confirmatory trials are required. Moreover, future investigation should also be undertaken to determine if costoclavicular blocks could achieve surgical anesthesia for shoulder surgery. Anterior suprascapular nerve blocks have been demonstrated to provide surgical anesthesia and similar analgesia to ISB. However, their risk of HDP has not been formally quantified. Of the remaining diaphragm-sparing nerve blocks, supraclavicular blocks (with local anesthetic injection posterolateral to the brachial plexus), upper trunk blocks, and combined infraclavicular-anterior suprascapular blocks merit further investigation, as they have been shown to achieve similar analgesia to ISB, coupled with an HDP incidence <10%.