Sympathetic blocks for complex regional pain syndrome: a survey of pain physicians

Effect duration of lumbar sympathetic ganglion neurolysis in patients with complex regional pain syndrome: a prospective observational study

Lumbar sympathetic ganglion neurolysis (LSGN) has been used for long-term pain relief in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). However, the actual effect duration of LSGN has not been accurately measured. This prospective observational study measured the effect duration of LSGN in CRPS patients and investigated the relationship between temperature change and pain relief. After performing LSGN, the skin temperatures of both the maximum pain site and the plantar area in the affected and unaffected limbs were measured by infrared thermography, and pain intensity was assessed before and at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months. The median time to return to baseline temperature was calculated using survival analysis. The skin temperature increased significantly at all-time points relative to baseline in both regions (maximum pain site: 1.4 °C ± 1.0 °C, plantar region: 1.28 °C ± 0.8 °C, all P < 0.001). The median time to return to baseline temperature was 12 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.7-16.3) at the maximum pain site and 12 weeks (95% CI 9.4-14.6) at the plantar area. Pain intensity decreased significantly relative to baseline, at all-time points after LSGN. In conclusion, the median duration of the LSGN is estimated to be 12 weeks.

Clinical results of lumbar sympathetic blocks in lower limb complex regional pain syndrome using infrared thermography as a support tool

AIM

To describe the clinical outcomes for a group of complex regional pain syndrome patients using infrared thermography as an intraprocedural support tool when undertaking fluoroscopy-guided lumbar sympathetic blocks.

SUBJECTS

27 patients with lower limb complex regional pain syndrome accompanied by severe pain and persistent functional impairment.

METHODS

A series of three fluoroscopic-guided lumbar sympathetic blocks with local anesthetic and corticoids using infrared thermography as an intraprocedural support tool were performed. Clinical variables were collected at baseline, prior to each block, and one, three, and six months after blocks in a standardized checklist assessing each of the clinical categories of complex regional pain syndrome stipulated in the Budapest criteria.

RESULTS

23.75% of the blocks required more than one chance to achieve the desired thermal pattern and therefore to be considered as successful. A decrease in pain measured on a visual analogic scale was observed at all time points compared to pre-blockade data, but only 37% of the cases were categorized as responders, representing a ≥ 30% decrease in VAS, with the disappearance of pain at rest. An improvement of most of the clinical variables recorded was observed, such as tingling, edema, perception of thermal asymmetry, difference in coloring and sweating. There was a significant decrease of neuropathic pain and improvement of functional limitation. Logistic regression analysis showed the main variable to explain the probability of being a responder was immobilization time (odds ratio of 0.89).

CONCLUSION

A series of fluoroscopy-guided lumbar sympathetic blocks controlled by infrared thermography in the treatment of lower limb CRPS showed a responder rate of 37%.

Application of machine learning algorithms in thermal images for an automatic classification of lumbar sympathetic blocks

PURPOSE

There are no previous studies developing machine learning algorithms in the classification of lumbar sympathetic blocks (LSBs) performance using infrared thermography data. The objective was to assess the performance of different machine learning algorithms to classify LSBs carried out in patients diagnosed with lower limbs Complex Regional Pain Syndrome as successful or failed based on the evaluation of thermal predictors.

METHODS

66 LSBs previously performed and classified by the medical team were evaluated in 24 patients. 11 regions of interest on each plantar foot were selected within the thermal images acquired in the clinical setting. From every region of interest, different thermal predictors were extracted and analysed in three different moments (minutes 4, 5, and 6) along with the baseline time (just after the injection of a local anaesthetic around the sympathetic ganglia). Among them, the thermal variation of the ipsilateral foot and the thermal asymmetry variation between feet at each minute assessed and the starting time for each region of interest, were fed into 4 different machine learning classifiers: an Artificial Neuronal Network, K-Nearest Neighbours, Random Forest, and a Support Vector Machine.

RESULTS

All classifiers presented an accuracy and specificity higher than 70%, sensitivity higher than 67%, and AUC higher than 0.73, and the Artificial Neuronal Network classifier performed the best with a maximum accuracy of 88%, sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 84% and AUC of 0.92, using 3 predictors.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest thermal data retrieved from plantar feet combined with a machine learning-based methodology can be an effective tool to automatically classify LSBs performance.

Efficacy of the lumbar sympathetic ganglion block in lower limb pain and its application prospects during the perioperative period

The sympathetic nervous system is involved in the physiological pathogenesis of many different types of chronic pain. Sympathetic blocks can interrupt the reflex control system by intercepting the noxious afferent fibers accompanying autonomic nerves, resulting in changes in peripheral or central sensory processing. A lumbar sympathetic ganglion block (LSGB), as a treatment method, refers to the injection of nerve blockers into the corresponding lumbar sympathetic nerve segments, usually requiring imaging assistance (CT, X-ray, ultrasound) to guide. At present, LSGB has been widely used in the clinical treatment of lower limb pain, such as neuropathic pain, lower limb ischemic pain, and so on. Its mechanism of action may be through inhibiting sympathetic nerve activity and dilating blood vessels, thereby alleviating pain and inhibiting stress response. However, there are few reports of LSGB during the perioperative period, especially in postoperative pain and gastrointestinal function. Therefore, by studying the literature about LSGB-related studies, this article reviews the anatomy of the lumbar sympathetic nerve (LSN), with its clinical application and possible mechanism. We reviewed the analgesic effect of LSGB in patients with lower limb pain and postoperative pain and the potential application prospects in the recovery of gastrointestinal function, finally providing a reference for its clinical application.

Correlation Between Temperature Rise after Sympathetic Block and Pain Relief in Patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Determine the correlation between post-sympathetic block pain temperature change, and immediate and intermediate-term pain relief.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

Academic setting.

SUBJECTS

79 pts with CRPS who underwent sympathetic block.

METHODS

Pre- and post-block temperatures in the affected extremity, and pain scores immediately (based on 6-hour pain diary) post-block and at the intermediate-term 4-8-week follow-up were recorded. Post-block pain reductions of 30-49% and ≥ 50% were designated as partially sympathetically-maintained pain (SMP) and SMP. A decrease in pain score ≥ 2-points lasting ≥ 4 weeks was considered a positive intermediate-term outcome for sympathetic block.

RESULTS

A weak correlation was found between immediate-term pain relief and the extent of temperature rise for the cohort (R = 0.192, P = 0.043). Greater immediate-term pain reduction was reported among patients who experienced ≥ 7.5° C temperature increase (mean 4.1, 95% CI [3.33, 4.76]) compared to those who experienced < 2° C (2.3, 95% CI [1.36, 3.31]) and ≥ 2° C x < 7.5° C (2.9, 95% CI [1.8; 3.9]; P = 0.036). The correlations between temperature increase and intermediate-term pain score reduction at 4-8 weeks (R = 0.052, P = 0.329), and between immediate and intermediate-term pain relief (R = 0.139, P = 0.119) were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

A weak correlation was found for those who experienced greater temperature increases post-block to experience greater immediate pain relief. Higher temperature increase cutoffs than are typically used may be necessary to determine whether a patient with CRPS has SMP.

Single-Injection Midpoint Transverse Process-to- Pleura Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES

The effect of midpoint transverse process-to-pleura block (MTPB) is unclear. The authors compared the analgesic characteristics of MTPB with those of thoracic paravertebral nerve block (TPVB) in patients undergoing uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (uVATS) and examined the 2 types of blocks for noninferiority.

DESIGN

A randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING

A single-institution, university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

The study comprised 82 patients between 18 and 75 years of age. Eighty-one patients were included for final analysis.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly allocated to either the MTPB group (Group M) or the TPVB group (Group P).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome was the mean difference in the postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score between Group M and Group P at rest and at 12 hours. The secondary outcomes included VAS scores during rest and coughing, nerve block performance, intraoperative consumption of anesthetics and vasoactive medication, time at first use of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA), number of uses of PCIA, consumption of sufentanil in PCIA, and side effects. The mean difference in VAS score in the MTPB and TPVB group at rest and 12 hours postoperatively was 0.5 (95% confidence interval, -0.26 to 0.36). There was no significant difference in the time at first use of PCIA, which was 12 (10, 12) hours and 11 (10, 12) hours in Group M and Group P, respectively. The depth of puncture was shallower, and the time to perform block was shorter in Group M compared with Group P (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The analgesic effect of single-level-injection MTPB is noninferior to that of TPVB in patients undergoing uVATS. The target point of the needle in MTPB is shallower and farther away from the pleura compared with TPVB. For these reasons, it is quicker and safer and, thus, may be preferable.

Quantitative Analysis of Real-Time Infrared Thermography for the Assessment of Lumbar Sympathetic Blocks: A Preliminary Study

Lumbar sympathetic blocks (LSBs) are commonly performed to treat pain ailments in the lower limbs. LSBs involve injecting local anesthetic around the nerves. The injection is guided by fluoroscopy which is sometimes considered to be insufficiently accurate. The main aim was to analyze the plantar foot skin temperature data acquired while performing LSBs in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) affecting the lower limbs. Forty-four LSBs for treating lower limb CRPS in 13 patients were assessed. Pain medicine physicians visualized the infrared thermography (IRT) video in real time and classified the performance depending on the observed thermal changes within the first 4 min. Thirty-two percent of the cases did not register temperature variations after lidocaine was injected, requiring the needle to be relocated. Differences between moments are indicated using the 95% confidence intervals of the differences (CI 95%), the Cohen effect size (ES) and the significance (p value). In successful cases, after injecting lidocaine, increases at minute 7 for the mean (CI 95% (1.4, 2.1 °C), p < 0.001 and ES = 0.5), at minute 5 for maximum temperature (CI 95% (2.3, 3.3 °C), p < 0.001 and ES = 0.6) and at minute 6 for SD (CI 95% (0.2, 0.3 °C), p < 0.001 and ES = 0.5) were observed. The results of our preliminary study showed that the measurement of skin temperature in real time by infrared thermography is valuable for assessing the success of lumbar sympathetic blocks.

Management of Musculoskeletal Pain: An Update with Emphasis on Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain

Musculoskeletal pain is a challenging condition for both patients and physicians. Many adults have experienced one or more episodes of musculoskeletal pain at some time of their lives, regardless of age, gender, or economic status. It affects approximately 47% of the general population. Of those, about 39–45% have long-lasting problems that require medical consultation. Inadequately managed musculoskeletal pain can adversely affect quality of life and impose significant socioeconomic problems. This manuscript presents a comprehensive review of the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain. It briefly explores the background, classifications, patient assessments, and different tools for management according to the recently available evidence. Multimodal analgesia and multidisciplinary approaches are fundamental elements of effective management of musculoskeletal pain. Both pharmacological, non-pharmacological, as well as interventional pain therapy are important to enhance patient’s recovery, well-being, and improve quality of life. Accordingly, recent guidelines recommend the implementation of preventative strategies and physical tools first to minimize the use of medications. In patients who have had an inadequate response to pharmacotherapy, the proper use of interventional pain therapy and the other alternative techniques are vital for safe and effective management of chronic pain patients.

Regional Techniques and Interventions for Intractable Neuropathic Pain

Collapse

Addition of corticosteroids to local anaesthetics for chronic non-cancer pain injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Despite common use, the benefit of adding steroids to local anaesthetics (SLA) for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) injections is uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of English-language RCTs to assess the benefit and safety of adding steroids to local anaesthetics (LA) for CNCP.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases from inception to May 2019. Trial selection and data extraction were performed in duplicate. Outcomes were guided by the Initiative in Methods, Measurements, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) statement with pain improvement as the primary outcome and pooled using random effects model and reported as relative risks (RR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Among 5097 abstracts, 73 trials were eligible. Although SLA increased the rate of success (42 trials, 3592 patients; RR=1.14; 95% CI, 1.03-1.25; number needed to treat [NNT], 13), the effect size decreased by nearly 50% (NNT, 22) with the removal of two intrathecal injection studies. The differences in pain scores with SLA were not clinically meaningful (54 trials, 4416 patients, MD=0.44 units; 95% CI, 0.24-0.65). No differences were observed in other outcomes or adverse events. No subgroup effects were detected based on clinical categories. Meta-regression showed no significant association with steroid dose or length of follow-up and pain relief.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of cortico steroids to local anaesthetic has only small benefits and a potential for harm. Injection of local anaesthetic alone could be therapeutic, beyond being diagnostic. A shared decision based on patient preferences should be considered. If used, one must avoid high doses and series of steroid injections.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO #: CRD42015020614.

Incidence of inadvertent intercostal or epidural spread during thoracic sympathetic ganglion block

Background

Sympathetic blocks (SBs) have been used widely to relieve the symptoms of sympathetically maintained pain (SMP). The thoracic sympathetic ganglion is not separated from somatic nerves by muscles and connective tissue. The upper thoracic ganglion runs along the posterior surface of the vertebral column in close proximity to the adjacent epidural region. This anatomical difference leads to frequent epidural and intercostal spread in cases of thoracic SBs. The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of inadvertent intercostal and epidural injections during thoracic SBs.

Methods

Twenty-two patients who were suffering from complex regional pain syndrome or lymphedema after breast cancer surgery were managed with two or three times of thoracic SBs. Therefore, injections of 63 thoracic SBs from 22 patients were enrolled in this study. An investigator who did not attend the procedure evaluated the occurrence of intercostal or epidural spread using anteroposterior fluoroscopic images.

Results

The overall incidence of inadvertent intercostal or epidural spread of contrast was 47.5%. Among the inadvertent injections, intercostal spread (34.9%) was more frequent than epidural spread (12.6%). Only 52.5% of the thoracic SBs demonstrated successful contrast spread without any inadvertent spread. The mean difference in skin temperature between the blocked and unblocked sides was 2.5 ± 1.8ºC. Fifty-nine (93.6%) injections demonstrated more than 1.5ºC difference.

Conclusions

Thoracic SBs showed a high incidence (47.5%) of inadvertent epidural or intercostal injection. Thus, special attention is required for the diagnosis of SMP or the injection of any neurolytic agent around sympathetic ganglion.

Complex regional pain syndrome: An updated comprehensive review

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a complex disorder that can have a significant impact on the quality of life of a person with this syndrome. The diagnosis and treatment of CRPS are often difficult as there is no one confirmatory test and no one definitive treatment. Currently, the most widely accepted clinical diagnostic criteria are the Budapest criteria, which were developed by expert consensus. Though no one single treatment has been found to be universally effective, early detection and an interdisciplinary approach to treatment appear to be key in treating CRPS. This review aims to present up-to-date clinical information regarding the diagnosis and management of CRPS and highlight the potential issues with diagnosis in the neurological population. Ultimately, more research is needed to identify the exact etiology of CRPS in order to help target appropriate therapies. In addition, more randomized controlled trials need to be performed in order to test new therapies or combinations of therapies, including pharmacological, interventional, and behavioral therapies, to determine the best treatment options for this potentially debilitating disorder.