1
|
Jones JH, Fleming N. Quality Improvement Projects and Anesthesiology Graduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2024; 16:e57908. [PMID: 38725749 PMCID: PMC11079850 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Quality improvement (QI) projects are essential components of graduate medical education and healthcare organizations to improve patient outcomes. We systematically reviewed the literature on QI projects in anesthesiology graduate medical education programs to assess whether these projects are leading to publications. A literature search was conducted in July 2023, using PubMed, Embase, and the Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for articles describing QI initiatives originating within the United States and applicable to anesthesiology residency training programs. The following data were collected: intervention(s), sample size (number of participants or events), outcome metric(s), result(s), and conclusion(s). One hundred and fifty publications were identified, and 31 articles met the inclusion criteria. A total of 2,259 residents and 72,889 events were included in this review. Educational modalities, such as simulation, training sessions, or online curricula, were the most prevalent interventions in the included studies. Pre-intervention and post-intervention assessments were the most common outcome metrics reported. Our review of the literature demonstrates that few QI projects performed within anesthesiology training programs lead to published manuscripts. Further research should aim at increasing the impact of required QI projects within the sponsoring institution and specialty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James H Jones
- Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Neal Fleming
- Anesthesia, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aguero P, Barnes RF, Flores A, von Drygalski A. Teleguidance for Patient Self-Imaging of Hemophilic Joints Using Mobile Ultrasound Devices: A Pilot Study. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2023; 42:701-712. [PMID: 35984090 DOI: 10.1002/jum.16084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Teleguidance on portable devices opens the possibility of joint self-imaging in persons with hemophilia (PWH). AIMS Determine the feasibility of patient self-imaging with/without teleguidance. METHODS Adult PWH received ultrasound teaching including 11 views for hemarthrosis detection in ankles, elbows, and knees. The patients acquired five randomly selected views with the Butterfly/IQ probe without assistance at 2, 6-8 weeks, and 3-4 months later, followed by teleguidance. Image acquisition was timed, patients identified anatomic landmarks, and image quality was graded. Questionnaires assessed the imaging experience. Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) indicated arthropathy status. RESULTS Of 132 PWH, 10 (median age 52 years) opted for study inclusion. Most had severe Hemophilia A, were white/non-Hispanic, with at least a high school degree and, overall, similar to the other 122 PWH. At 2 and 6 weeks after training, ~80% images were acquired correctly compared with 53% at 12 weeks. Accuracy of landmark recognition was ~55%. With teleguidance, all images were acquired correctly, with near-perfect image quality (P ≤ .01 compared with the 3-4 month time point). Median HJHS of scanned joints was 11.5 at each time point, demonstrating a similar spectrum of arthropathic changes. Median time of image acquisition was fast, and similar with or without teleguidance (median 01:04 [mm:ss] vs median 01:02), but differed slightly between arthropathic and non-arthropathic joints. Study participants and the imaging facilitator rated that it was easy to navigate mobile technology and acquire images with teleguidance. CONCLUSION Mobile ultrasound with teleguidance for joint self-imaging is feasible and warrants further exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Aguero
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Richard Fw Barnes
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Andres Flores
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Annette von Drygalski
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
The Evaluation Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Post-Anesthesia Unit-A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10112389. [PMID: 34071466 PMCID: PMC8198895 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10112389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2021] [Revised: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is the most rapidly growing imaging modality for acute care. Despite increased use, there is still wide variability and less evidence regarding its clinical utility for the perioperative setting compared to other acute care settings. This study sought to demonstrate the impact of POCUS examinations for acute hypoxia and hypotension occurring in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) versus traditional bedside examinations. Methods: This study was designed as a multi-center prospective observational study. Adult patients who experienced a reduced mean arterial blood pressure (MAP < 60mmHG) and/or a reduced oxygen saturation (SpO2 < 88%) in the PACU from 7AM to 4PM were targeted. POCUS was available or not for patient assessment based on PACU team training. All providers who performed POCUS exams received standardized training on cardiac and pulmonary POCUS. All POCUS exam findings were recorded on a standardized form and the number of suspected mechanisms to trigger the acute event were captured before and after the POCUS exam. PACU length of stay (minutes) across groups was the primary outcome. Results: In total, 128 patients were included in the study, with 92 patients receiving a POCUS exam. Comparison of PACU time between the POCUS group (median = 96.5 min) and no-POCUS groups (median = 120.5 min) demonstrated a reduction for the POCUS group, p = 0.019. Hospital length of stay and 30-day hospital readmission did not show a significant difference between groups. Finally, there was a reduction in the number of suspected diagnoses from before to after the POCUS examination for both pulmonary and cardiac exams, p-values < 0.001. Conclusions: Implementation of POCUS for assessment of acute hypotension and hypoxia in the PACU setting is associated with a reduced PACU length of stay and a reduction in suspected number of diagnoses.
Collapse
|
4
|
Naji A, Chappidi M, Ahmed A, Monga A, Sanders J. Perioperative Point-of-Care Ultrasound Use by Anesthesiologists. Cureus 2021; 13:e15217. [PMID: 34178536 PMCID: PMC8221658 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.15217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Point-of-Care ultrasound (POCUS) is the bedside utilization of ultrasound, in real-time, to aid in the diagnosis and treatment of patients. Image acquisition from POCUS utilization by anesthesiologists involves the assessment of multiple organs in different perioperative situations. POCUS can be utilized to enhance clinical decision-making in a variety of perioperative situations due to its ability to assess endotracheal tube placement, cardiac function, pulmonary function, aspiration risk, hemodynamics, vascular access, and nerve visualization for regional procedures. The mounting clinical evidence for the value of POCUS in perioperative settings, its growing affordability, and its low associated risks are responsible for the nationwide movement across many anesthesiology residency programs to increase the focus on perioperative ultrasound training. The purpose of this review is to present to current anesthesiologists and anesthesiology trainees, a broad discussion regarding the diverse utility and importance of POCUS in perioperative settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah Naji
- Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health Science University Hospital, Portland, USA
| | - Monica Chappidi
- Anesthesiology, College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, USA
| | | | - Aaron Monga
- Anesthesiology, College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Haskins SC, Bronshteyn Y, Perlas A, El-Boghdadly K, Zimmerman J, Silva M, Boretsky K, Chan V, Kruisselbrink R, Byrne M, Hernandez N, Boublik J, Manson WC, Hogg R, Wilkinson JN, Kalagara H, Nejim J, Ramsingh D, Shankar H, Nader A, Souza D, Narouze S. American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine expert panel recommendations on point-of-care ultrasound education and training for regional anesthesiologists and pain physicians-part II: recommendations. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2021; 46:1048-1060. [PMID: 33632777 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a critical skill for all regional anesthesiologists and pain physicians to help diagnose relevant complications related to routine practice and guide perioperative management. In an effort to inform the regional anesthesia and pain community as well as address a need for structured education and training, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Society (ASRA) commissioned this narrative review to provide recommendations for POCUS. The recommendations were written by content and educational experts and were approved by the guidelines committee and the Board of Directors of the ASRA. In part II of this two-part series, learning goals and objectives were identified and outlined for achieving competency in the use of POCUS, specifically, airway ultrasound, lung ultrasound, gastric ultrasound, the focus assessment with sonography for trauma exam, and focused cardiac ultrasound, in the perioperative and chronic pain setting. It also discusses barriers to POCUS education and training and proposes a list of educational resources. For each POCUS section, learning goals and specific skills were presented in the Indication, Acquisition, Interpretation, and Medical decision-making framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen C Haskins
- Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA .,Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yuriy Bronshteyn
- Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anahi Perlas
- Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Joshua Zimmerman
- Anesthesiology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Marcos Silva
- Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karen Boretsky
- Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Vincent Chan
- Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Melissa Byrne
- Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Nadia Hernandez
- Anesthesiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jan Boublik
- Anesthesiology, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, California, USA
| | - William Clark Manson
- Anesthesiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Rosemary Hogg
- Anaesthesia, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Jonathan N Wilkinson
- Intensive Care and Anaesthesia, Northampton General Hospital, Northampton, Northamptonshire, UK
| | | | - Jemiel Nejim
- Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.,Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Davinder Ramsingh
- Anesthesiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California, USA
| | - Hariharan Shankar
- Anesthesiology, Clement Zablocki VA Medical Center/Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Antoun Nader
- Anesthesiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Dmitri Souza
- Center for Pain Medicine, Western Reserve Hospital, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, USA
| | - Samer Narouze
- Center for Pain Medicine, Western Reserve Hospital, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|