Discontinuation and switching patterns of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) in TNFi-naive and TNFi-experienced patients with psoriatic arthritis: an observational study from the US-based Corrona registry

Primary non-response in inflammatory arthritis treated with biologics and targeted therapies in daily clinical practice

Background

Switching between therapies is a recommended strategy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients who experience treatment failure; moreover, data on switching due to primary non-response and subsequent failures are limited.

Objectives

To obtain information from clinical practice regarding failures due to primary non-response in patients on biologic and target synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (ts/bDMARDs), assessing the incidence rate (IR) of switching due to primary non-response and risk of subsequent treatment failure by cycling compared to swapping.

Design

A longitudinal retrospective study, spanning from 2007 to 2022, was conducted on patients with RA or PsA treated with ts/bDMARDs at an outpatient rheumatology clinic.

Methods

The main outcomes were as follows: (1) ts/bDMARD failure due to primary non-response and (2) subsequent discontinuation of prescribed ts/bDMARD due to lack of efficacy. The independent variable was switching between classes compared to switching within class. As covariates, clinical, sociodemographic, clinical, and treatments were considered. To estimate ts/bDMARDs switching rates, survival techniques were used, expressing the IR per 100 patients * year with their 95% confidence interval. Cox multivariate regression analyses were run to assess the role of switching between/within class in the subsequent treatment failure.

Results

In total, 327 patients were included. Of these, 50 patients in 77 treatment courses developed primary non-response with an IR of 4.25 (3.4-5.3). The IR was quite similar between RA and PsA, higher in women, and in those who started ts/bDMARDs after 2018. In those with primary non-response, there were 42 subsequent treatment failures with an IR of 26.38 (19.49-35.69). The multivariate model showed that cycling increased the risk of subsequent failure compared to swapping (hazard ratio: 2 (1.1-3.77), p = 0.03).

Conclusion

This study provides support to consider swapping a better alternative rather than cycling after primary non-response.

Guselkumab versus golimumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis and inadequate response to an initial tumor necrosis factor inhibitor: study protocol for EVOLUTION, a pragmatic, phase 3b, open-label, randomized, controlled effectiveness trial

BACKGROUND

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a multi-domain, inflammatory disease impacting joints, soft tissues, and skin; tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) are typically the first biologic following inadequate response (IR) to conventional therapies. Although guidance is lacking on therapy selection after initial TNFi failure, data suggest TNFi-IR PsA patients may benefit from switching to a different mechanism of action (MOA) vs. cycling to another TNFi. Guselkumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin-23p19 subunit. Emphasizing practicality and applicability to routine clinical practice, EVOLUTION will pragmatically evaluate whether switching to guselkumab is more effective than cycling to a second TNFi (subcutaneous [SC] golimumab) in TNFi-IR PsA patients.

METHODS

The multicenter, longitudinal, prospective, observational Psoriatic Arthritis Research Consortium study guided eligibility criteria, outcome measures, and sample size estimates. Adults seen in clinical practice with active PsA (≥ 1 swollen joint) while receiving TNFi treatment will be eligible. Participants will be randomized (1:1:1) to guselkumab 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); guselkumab 100 mg at Week 0, Week 4, and Q8W; or SC golimumab 50 mg Q4W (no washout period). The novel primary composite endpoint is achievement of clinical Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA) low disease activity (≤ 13) and an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of psoriasis score of 0/1 (scale: 0-4) at Month12. Secondary endpoints include cDAPSA + IGA 0/1 at Month 6; achievement of minimal disease activity, resolution of enthesitis and dactylitis (among patients affected at baseline) at Months 6/12; and mean changes at Months 6/12 in the 12-item PsA Impact of Disease, Dermatology Life Quality Index, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurements Information System fatigue and depression questionnaires, and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (patients with physician-determined axial disease). The target sample size is 150 participants (50/treatment group); all analyses are considered exploratory.

DISCUSSION

EVOLUTION will employ a pragmatic approach, including a novel primary endpoint relevant to clinical practice, to assess whether switching to an alternate MOA biologic with guselkumab is more effective than cycling to a second TNFi among TNFi-IR PsA patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05669833, on 3 January 2023, https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov/study/NCT05669833?term=%20NCT05669833&rank=1.

Long-term tofacitinib efficacy and safety in psoriatic arthritis with or without prior biologic DMARD exposure: a post hoc analysis

Objective

To assess long-term tofacitinib efficacy and safety in patients with PsA with or without prior biologic DMARD (bDMARD) exposure.

Methods

Data were pooled post hoc from three phase 3 and one long-term extension (LTE) PsA studies and stratified by TNF inhibitor-inadequate responder (TNFi-IR) or bDMARD-naïve patient status at the phase 3 study baseline. Data were reported as all tofacitinib (patients receiving one or more tofacitinib doses) or average tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg twice daily (patients receiving an average total daily dose <15 and ≥15 mg, respectively). Drug survival to month 51, efficacy to month 42 and safety were assessed descriptively.

Results

A total of 408 TNFi-IR patients (including 29 TNFi-experienced with unknown IR status) and 562 bDMARD-naïve patients were included. At baseline, TNFi-IR patients were more likely to be ≥65 years old, have cardiovascular/venous thromboembolism risk and have longer disease duration vs bDMARD-naïve patients. Drug survival was numerically shorter in TNFi-IR vs bDMARD-naïve patients. Tofacitinib efficacy was generally sustained to month 42, regardless of prior bDMARD treatment. Minimal disease activity/ PsA Disease Activity Score ≤3.2/>75% Psoriasis Area and Severity Index improvement response rates were numerically lower in TNFi-IR vs bDMARD-naïve patients to month 42, but rates of achieving an HAQ Disability Index ≤0.5 and enthesitis/dactylitis resolution were similar. In TNFi-IR vs bDMARD-naïve patients, treatment-emergent adverse event incidence rates were higher and serious adverse event, serious infection and herpes zoster incidence rates were numerically higher (CI overlapped).

Conclusion

These findings support long-term tofacitinib efficacy and safety in TNFi-IR and bDMARD-naïve patients. However, the benefit-risk profile appeared more favourable in bDMARD-naïve patients, likely due to differences in baseline characteristics and risk factors between subgroups.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01877668, NCT01882439, NCT03486457, NCT01976364.

Cycling versus swapping strategies with TNF-α inhibitors and IL-17 inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis in clinical practice

The availability of a number of bDMARDs with different mechanism of action increases potential treatment pathways in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). In clinical practice, following the failure of one bDMARD, it is normal to consider which options are the best for switching strategy. In most cases this choice involves IL17i and TNFi. The main aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of cycling (from TNFi to another TNFi) and swapping (from TNFi to IL17i or vice versa) strategies. In this monocentric retrospective observational study, all PsA patients treated with TNFi or IL17i between January 2016 and January 2022 were enrolled. The prescriptions were clustered in one cycling group (CG), and two swap groups: from TNFi to IL17i (SG1) and from IL17i to TNFi (SG2). The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models were applied to compare the drug retention rates and to identify factors affecting treatment persistence. A total of 122 patients were enrolled. The CG, SG1 and SG2 2-years retention rates were 51%, 58% and 34% (p = 0.1), respectively. SG1 strategy (HR 0.53; CI 0.31-0.89; p = 0.02), age (HR 0.98; CI 0.96-0.99; p = 0.003), Disease Activity PsA (HR 1.11; CI 1.08-1.13; p < 0.0001), year of switch (HR 1.78; CI 1.39-2.22; p < 0.0001) influenced the retention rate. The findings of this real-world study, even if burdened by bias related to its observational nature, support the hypothesis that in PsA patients swapping from TNFi to IL17i might be more effective than cycling TNFis.

Safety and Efficacy of Bimekizumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: 2-Year Results from Two Phase 3 Studies

INTRODUCTION

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease requiring long-term treatment. Bimekizumab, a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-17F in addition to IL-17A, has demonstrated tolerability and sustained clinical efficacy for up to 1 year for patients with PsA. Here, we report the longer-‍term safety and efficacy of bimekizumab up to 2 years.

METHODS

BE OPTIMAL (biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug [bDMARD]-naïve) and BE COMPLETE (prior inadequate response/intolerance to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors [TNFi-IR]) assessed subcutaneous bimekizumab 160 mg every 4 weeks in patients with PsA. BE OPTIMAL included a reference arm (adalimumab 40 mg every 2 weeks); patients switched to bimekizumab at week 52 with no washout between treatments. BE OPTIMAL week 52 and BE COMPLETE week 16 completers were eligible for the BE VITAL open-label extension. Efficacy outcomes are reported to week 104/100 (BE OPTIMAL/BE COMPLETE).

RESULTS

A total of 710/852 (83.3%) bDMARD-naïve and 322/400 (80.5%) TNFi-IR patients completed week 104/100. Up to 104 weeks, patients treated with bimekizumab in BE OPTIMAL and BE COMPLETE had treatment-emergent adverse event incidence rates (exposure-adjusted incidence rate/100 patient-years) of 179.9 (95% CI 166.9, 193.7) and 100.3 (89.2, ‍112.4), respectively. The proportion of patients achieving efficacy outcomes (≥ 50% improvement from baseline in American College of Rheumatology [ACR] response criteria, 100% improvement from baseline in Psorisis Area and Severity Index [PASI], minimal disease activity [MDA]) was sustained in all patients from week 52 to week 104/100.

CONCLUSIONS

Bimekizumab was well tolerated for up to 2 years of treatment and no new safety signals were observed. Sustained clinical efficacy was observed up to 2 years in bDMARD-naïve and TNFi-IR patients with active PsA. Patients switching from adalimumab to bimekizumab demonstrated further improvement in skin and nail symptoms, and sustained efficacy in joint symptoms.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

BE OPTIMAL (NCT03895203), BE COMPLETE (NCT03896581), BE VITAL (NCT04009499).

Difficult-to-Treat Psoriatic Arthritis: A Conceptual Approach

image

Effectiveness of Tofacitinib in Patients Initiating Therapy for Psoriatic Arthritis: Results from the CorEvitas Psoriatic Arthritis/Spondyloarthritis Registry

INTRODUCTION

Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated tofacitinib efficacy for psoriatic arthritis (PsA); however, real-world effectiveness data are limited. This real-world analysis assessed baseline demographics/disease characteristics and tofacitinib effectiveness in patients with PsA in the CorEvitas PsA/Spondyloarthritis Registry.

METHODS

This study (NCT05195814) included patients with PsA initiating tofacitinib from December 2017-December 2021, as monotherapy or with oral small molecules (methotrexate/leflunomide/sulfasalazine/apremilast), pre-existing use, or initiated concurrently.

OUTCOMES

mean change from baseline in disease activity/patient-reported outcomes, proportion of patients achieving low disease activity (LDA)/remission at 6 ± 3 months, and discontinuation rates.

RESULTS

Of 222 patients with PsA who initiated tofacitinib (60.8% as monotherapy), 123 patients had 6 ± 3 months of follow-up. At initiation, 59.7% were female, 92.3% were White, mean age was 56.3 years, PsA duration since diagnosis was 8.2 years, and 25.7% were biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD)-naïve. Improvements to 6 ± 3 months were observed with tofacitinib for Clinical Disease Activity Index for PsA (cDAPSA), DAPSA, PsA Disease Activity Score (PASDAS), Clinical Disease Activity Index, body surface area (BSA), tender/swollen joint count, patient fatigue, pain, Patient Global Skin Assessment, and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index. At 6 ± 3 months, 25.0%/7.8% of patients treated with tofacitinib achieved cDAPSA-defined LDA/remission, 18.2% achieved minimal disease activity, 30.8% had PASDAS ≤ 3.2, 42.9%/29.4% had resolved enthesitis/dactylitis, and 22.5% achieved BSA = 0%. Tofacitinib discontinuation occurred in 51.2% of patients (51.6% of monotherapy initiators) at/prior to 6 ± 3 months (27.6%/23.6%), 57.1% of whom switched to tumor necrosis factor/interleukin-17 inhibitors. Reasons for discontinuation were not reported in 85.3%/79.3% of patients who discontinued at/prior to 6 ± 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world US cohort analysis described patients with PsA newly initiating tofacitinib; most were bDMARD-experienced or receiving monotherapy treatment. In patients who remained on therapy (48.8%), tofacitinib was effective across multiple PsA domains at 6 ± 3 months. Limitations included small patient numbers at follow-up and potential selection bias.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT05195814.

Multi-failure psoriasis patients: characterization of the patients and response to biological therapy in a multicenter Italian cohort

INTRODUCTION

Patients with psoriasis who have failed multiple biologic drugs have been defined as "multi-failure," although there are no clear data on the characteristics, comorbidities, and best treatment strategies for this population. Nowadays, given the next generation and the number of biologics available, patients are considered multi-failure when ≥4 biologics fail to achieve a good response.

METHODS

Demographic characteristics and efficacy of anti-interleukin drugs in multi-failure patients were compared to a cohort of general psoriatic patients treated with IL-23 or IL-17 inhibitors.

RESULTS

In total 97 multi-failure patients (≥4 lines of biologics) were compared with 1,057 patients in the general cohort. The current drugs in the multi-failure group were risankizumab (34), ixekizumab (23), guselkumab (21), brodalumab (7), tildrakizumab (5), ustekinumab (4), secukinumab (2), and certolizumab pegol (1). A significant difference was found in the multi-failure cohort for age of psoriasis onset (mean 29.7 vs. 35.1, P < 0.001), concurrent psoriatic arthritis (45.4 vs. 26.9%, P < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (30.9 vs. 10.9%, P < 0.001), and cardiovascular comorbidity (54.6 vs. 39.8%, P = 0.005). In multi-failure patients, current biological therapy showed a good initial response (PASI 90 and 100 of 41.24 and 27.84%, respectively, at 16 weeks); the response tended to decline after 40 weeks. Anti-IL-17 agents showed clinical superiority over IL-23 agents in terms of achieving PASI90 at 28 weeks (P < 0.001) and 40 weeks (P = 0.007), after which they reached a plateau. In contrast, IL-23 agents showed a slower but progressive improvement that was maintained for up to 52 weeks. A similar trend was also seen for PASI100 (28 weeks P = 0.032; 40 weeks P = 0.121).

CONCLUSIONS

The multi-failure patient is characterized by many comorbidities and longstanding inflammatory disease that frequently precedes the introduction of systemic biologic therapy. Further studies are needed to identify more specific criteria that could be applied as a guideline by clinicians.

Management of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases after treatment failure with a first tumour necrosis factor inhibitor: A narrative review

The emergence of biologics with different modes of action (MoAs) and therapeutic targets has changed treatment patterns in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. While tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) are often utilized as the first biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, some patients may not respond adequately (primary failure), fail to sustain response over time (secondary failure), or experience intolerable adverse events. Whether these patients would benefit more from cycling to a different TNFi or switching to a biologic with a different MoA is still unclear. We discuss here treatment outcomes of TNFi cycling versus MoA switching after treatment failure with a first TNFi in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases, focusing specifically on rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, and juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Treatment guidelines for these patients are ambiguous and, at times, contradictory in their recommendations. However, this is due to a lack of high-quality head-to-head data to definitively support cycling between TNFis after failure to a first-line TNFi over switching to a different MoA.

Persistence of Biologics in the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis: Data From a Large Hospital-Based Longitudinal Cohort

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the trends in biologics use at a specialized center over a period of 20 years.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 571 patients diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis enrolled in the Toronto cohort who initiated biologic therapy between January 1, 2000, and July 7, 2020. The probability of drug persistence over time was estimated nonparametrically. The time to discontinuation of first and second treatment was analyzed using Cox regression models, whereas a semiparametric failure time model with a gamma frailty was used to analyze the discontinuation of treatment over successive administrations of biologic therapy.

RESULTS

The highest 3-year persistence probability was observed with certolizumab when used as first biologic treatment, while interleukin-17 inhibitors had the lowest probability. However, when used as second medication, certolizumab had the lowest drug survival even when accounting for selection bias. Depression and/or anxiety were associated with a higher rate of drug discontinuation due to all causes (relative risk [RR] 1.68, P = 0.01), while having higher education was associated with lower rates (RR 0.65, P = 0.03). In the analysis accommodating multiple courses of biologics, a higher tender joint count was associated with a higher rate of discontinuation due to all causes (RR 1.02, P = 0.01). Older age at the start of first treatment was associated with a higher rate of discontinuation due to side effects (RR 1.03, P = 0.01), while obesity had a protective role (RR 0.56, P = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Persistence in taking biologics depends on whether the biologic was used as first or second treatment. Depression and anxiety, higher tender joint count, and older age lead to drug discontinuation.

Ixekizumab therapy following secukinumab inadequate response in psoriatic arthritis: a case series focusing on axial disease

There are limited data regarding cycling between interleukin-17 (IL-17) inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We aimed to report the efficacy of an IL-17 inhibitor (ixekizumab-IXE) after inadequate response (IR) of another one (secukinumab-SEC) in patients with PsA. Case series of PsA patients who received IXE after SEC-IR in four rheumatology centers between 1/9/2021 and 1/9/2022 were included. Peripheral arthritis was assessed with disease activity in psoriatic arthritis score (DAPSA) and skin involvement with body surface area (BSA). Axial disease was defined as having both imaging and clinical features and its activity was measured with the ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS). Twenty-four patients (54.2% female, mean [SD] age: 51.6 [14.1]) who were SEC-IR and received IXE either immediately (n = 11) or after ≥ 1 interposed biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) (n = 13) were included. Patients were followed on IXE for a mean [SD] period of 9.6 [4.9] months. Among patients with peripheral arthritis (n = 24), the mean [SD] DAPSA decreased from 22.8 [8.6] to 13.6 [7.8] during follow-up (p =  0.0001) with 62.5% of patients showing improvement in the DAPSA disease activity categories. For patients with axial involvement (n = 16), a clinically meaningful improvement (Δ ≥ 1.1 in ASDAS) was noted in 50% (8/16), while dactylitis and enthesitis resolution was observed in 60% (3/5) and 83% (5/6) of patients, respectively. Regarding psoriasis, the mean [SD] BSA of involved skin decreased from 8.7 [8.7] to 2.4 [3.3] (p =  0.001). In this case series, treatment with IXE after inadequate response to another IL-17 inhibitor (SEC) was efficacious in a real-world setting in patients with PsA, including axial disease.

Bimekizumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis and previous inadequate response or intolerance to tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (BE COMPLETE)

BACKGROUND

Bimekizumab is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-17F and IL-17A. This study compared the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab with placebo over 16 weeks in patients with active psoriatic arthritis and previous inadequate response or intolerance to tumour necrosis factor-α (TNFα) inhibitors.

METHODS

BE COMPLETE was a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted across 92 sites (including hospitals, clinics, and research centres) in 11 countries (Australia, Canada, Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Poland, Russia, the UK, and the USA). Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with adult-onset psoriatic arthritis (meeting the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis for at least 6 months before screening) with a history of inadequate response or intolerance to treatment with one or two TNFα inhibitors for either psoriatic arthritis or psoriasis. We stratified patients with active psoriatic arthritis by region and previous TNFα inhibitor use. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive subcutaneous bimekizumab 160 mg every 4 weeks or placebo by an interactive-voice and web-response system on the basis of a predetermined randomisation schedule. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with 50% or greater improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR50) at week 16 (non-responder imputation). Efficacy analyses were done in the randomised population. The safety analysis set comprised patients who received one or more doses of study treatment. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03896581, and is completed.

FINDINGS

Between March 28, 2019, and Feb 14, 2022, 556 patients were screened and 400 patients were randomly assigned to bimekizumab 160 mg every 4 weeks (n=267) or placebo (n=133). The primary and all hierarchical secondary endpoints were met at week 16. 116 (43%) of 267 patients receiving bimekizumab reached ACR50, compared with nine (7%) of 133 patients receiving placebo (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 11·1 [95% CI 5·4-23·0], p<0·0001). 121 (69%) of 176 patients with psoriasis affecting at least 3% body surface area at baseline who received bimekizumab reached 90% or greater improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI90), compared with six (7%) of 88 patients who received placebo (adjusted OR 30·2 [12·4-73·9], p<0·0001). Treatment-emergent adverse events up to week 16 were reported in 108 (40%) of 267 patients receiving bimekizumab and 44 (33%) of 132 patients receiving placebo. There were no new safety signals and no deaths.

INTERPRETATION

Bimekizumab treatment led to superior improvements in joint and skin efficacy outcomes at week 16 compared with placebo in patients with psoriatic arthritis and inadequate response or intolerance to TNFα inhibitors. The safety profile of bimekizumab was consistent with previous phase 3 studies in patients with plaque psoriasis, and studies of IL-17A inhibitors.

FUNDING

UCB Pharma.

Impact of fibre and red/processed meat intake on treatment outcomes among patients with chronic inflammatory diseases initiating biological therapy: A prospective cohort study

Background

Biologic disease-modifying drugs have revolutionised the treatment of a number of chronic inflammatory diseases (CID). However, up to 60% of the patients do not have a sufficient response to treatment and there is a need for optimization of treatment strategies.

Objective

To investigate if the treatment outcome of biological therapy is associated with the habitual dietary intake of fibre and red/processed meat in patients with a CID.

Methods

In this multicentre prospective cohort study, we consecutively enrolled 233 adult patients with a diagnosis of Crohn's Disease, Ulcerative Colitis, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Axial Spondyloarthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis and Psoriasis, for whom biologic therapy was planned, over a 3 year period. Patients with completed baseline food frequency questionnaires were stratified into a high fibre/low red and processed meat exposed group (HFLM) and an unexposed group (low fibre/high red and processed meat intake = LFHM). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a clinical response to biologic therapy after 14-16 weeks of treatment.

Results

Of the 193 patients included in our primary analysis, 114 (59%) had a clinical response to biologic therapy. In the HFLM group (N = 64), 41 (64%) patients responded to treatment compared to 73 (56%) in the LFHM group (N = 129), but the difference was not statistically significant (OR: 1.48, 0.72-3.05). For RA patients however, HFLM diet was associated with a more likely clinical response (82% vs. 35%; OR: 9.84, 1.35-71.56).

Conclusion

Habitual HFLM intake did not affect the clinical response to biological treatment across CIDs. HFLM diet in RA patients might be associated with better odds for responding to biological treatment, but this would need confirmation in a randomised trial.

Trial registration

(clinicaltrials.gov), identifier [NCT03173144].

Identifying inadequate response among patients with ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis prescribed advanced therapy in a real-world, commercially insured adult population in the USA

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess treatment patterns and frequency of inadequate response associated with advanced therapy initiation among patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in the USA.

METHODS

Adult patients with AS or PsA who initiated advanced therapy were identified from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database®. Inadequate response to advanced therapies (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors [TNFi] and non-TNFi biologics) was identified using a claims-based algorithm. Factors influencing inadequate response were assessed using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

In total, 646 patients with AS, and 1433 patients with PsA were evaluated. Among patients with AS (mean age, 43 years; male, 58%), 93% patients initiated TNFi, and 69% of patients had inadequate response. In patients with PsA (mean age, 49 years; male, 47%), 67% initiated TNFi, and 77% had inadequate response. Low adherence was the main predictor of inadequate response in patients with AS (56%) and PsA (63%). Inadequate responders were more likely to be female (odds ratio [OR] 2.05 for AS and 1.37 for PsA). Prior exposure to TNFi was associated with 3.89- and 2.14-fold greater odds of inadequate response in both AS and PsA patients, respectively, while patients using methotrexate were less likely to have inadequate response (OR 0.48 for AS and 0.72 for PsA; all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Over 69% of patients with AS and 77% of patients with PsA had inadequate response to their index advanced therapy during 1 year after initiation. Health plan claims data appear useful to classify inadequate responders in AS and PsA. Key Points • Estimating inadequate response to advanced therapies and identifying factors associated with this outcome using claims data could improve treatment outcomes in AS and PsA. • In a sample of commercially insured US patients, over 69% of patients with AS and 77% of patients with PsA had inadequate response to their index advanced therapy during 1 year after initiation. Patient characteristics such as sex and prior therapy use were predictive of inadequate response to advanced therapies. • Health plan claims data appear useful to classify inadequate responders in AS and PsA and identify factors associated with this outcome.

Responses to Ixekizumab in Male and Female Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: Results from Two Randomized, Phase 3 Clinical Trials

Introduction

Differences in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treatment response between sexes for ixekizumab, an interleukin-17A antagonist, are largely unexplored. This analysis used data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating ixekizumab to study differences in treatment response between male and female patients with PsA.

Methods

We used pooled data from patients enrolled in SPIRIT-P1 and SPIRIT-P2 (NCT01695239 and NCT02349295, respectively), phase 3 RCTs evaluating ixekizumab every 4 and 2 weeks in patients with active PsA. Subgroups of patients were defined by sex (male, female). Efficacy was measured by the proportion of male and female patients achieving American College of Rheumatology 20%/50%/70% improvement criteria (ACR20/50/70), minimal disease activity or very low disease activity (MDA/VLDA), and Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) scores representing low disease activity (LDA) or remission through week 156. Changes from baseline in components of the above measures were also assessed through week 156.

Results

Compared to male patients at baseline, female patients were older, had higher body mass index and lower C-reactive protein levels, and had worse tender joint count, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index, and Leeds Enthesitis Index scores. Through week 156, female patients in all treatment arms had lower response rates than male patients in all analyzed composite measures (ACR20/50/70; MDA/VLDA; DAPSA LDA/remission), with significant differences observed at multiple timepoints in both ixekizumab treatment arms. Female patients also had smaller numeric changes from baseline in the composite measures’ individual components.

Conclusion

Compared to female patients, male patients had greater response rates in ACR20/50/70, MDA/VLDA, and DAPSA LDA/remission and numerically larger improvements in these measures’ individual components, although clinical significance is unclear. Continued efforts to understand sex differences in treatment response may provide insights that can help optimize clinical decision making.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT01695239 and NCT02349295.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-022-00445-w.

Efficacy and safety of risankizumab for active psoriatic arthritis: 24-week results from the randomised, double-blind, phase 3 KEEPsAKE 2 trial

OBJECTIVES

Risankizumab is an interleukin-23 inhibitor under study for the treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The phase 3 KEEPsAKE 2 trial investigated the efficacy and safety of risankizumab versus placebo in patients with active PsA who had previous inadequate response or intolerance to ≤2 biological therapies (Bio-IR) and/or ≥1 conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD-IR). Results through week 24 are reported here.

METHODS

Adults with PsA who were Bio-IR and/or csDMARD-IR were randomised to receive subcutaneously administered risankizumab 150 mg or placebo at weeks 0, 4 and 16 during a 24-week, double-blind treatment period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved ≥20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology score (ACR20) at week 24. Secondary endpoints assessed key domains of PsA and patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 444 patients (median age 53 years, range 23-84 years) were randomised to risankizumab (n=224) or placebo (n=220); 206 patients (46.5%) were Bio-IR. At week 24, a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving risankizumab achieved the primary endpoint of ACR20 (51.3% vs 26.5%, p<0.001) and all secondary endpoints (p<0.05) compared with placebo. Serious adverse events were reported for 4.0% and 5.5% of risankizumab-treated and placebo-treated patients, respectively; serious infections were reported for 0.9% and 2.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with risankizumab resulted in significant improvements versus placebo in key disease outcomes and was well tolerated in patients with PsA who were Bio-IR and/or csDMARD-IR.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03671148.

Demographics, Disease Characteristics, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Patients with Psoriasis Who Initiated Guselkumab in CorEvitas' Psoriasis Registry

Introduction

Guselkumab is approved for the treatment of both moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in the USA. However, little is known about patients initiating guselkumab in a real-world setting. The objective of this study was to describe baseline characteristics among patients with plaque psoriasis who initiated guselkumab at or after enrollment in CorEvitas’ Psoriasis Registry.

Methods

Adult patients who initiated guselkumab in the Psoriasis Registry between July 18, 2017 and November 6, 2018 were included. Demographics, disease characteristics, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed at the time of guselkumab initiation (baseline). Patients with psoriasis were stratified according to the number of previously received biologics (0 to 4+) for comparison. A subset of patients with psoriasis and concomitant dermatologist-diagnosed PsA were stratified into biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced groups.

Results

Among 687 patients with psoriasis who initiated guselkumab, biologic-naïve patients and those with four or more prior biologics had the most severe disease and the worst PROM scores at baseline. Among 251 patients with concomitant dermatologist-diagnosed PsA, biologic-naïve patients had more severe disease and worse PROM scores than biologic-experienced patients.

Conclusions

These findings highlight important differences in baseline characteristics according to biologic experience among patients with plaque psoriasis with or without concomitant PsA initiating guselkumab in a real-world setting.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-021-00637-2.

Improvement from ixekizumab treatment in patients with psoriatic arthritis who have had an inadequate response to one or two TNF inhibitors

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of ixekizumab (IXE), a monoclonal antibody selectively targeting interleukin-17A, in patients with inadequate response to one or two TNF inhibitors (TNFi).

Methods

A phase 3 study (SPIRIT-P2; NCT02349295) randomized patients with PsA with inadequate response or intolerance to one or two TNFi to receive 80-mg IXE every 2 weeks (n = 123) or every 4 weeks (n = 122) after a 160-mg starting dose or placebo (PBO; n = 118) through week 24. This post hoc analysis used data from inadequate responders to one or two TNFi, measuring the percentage achieving: ≥50% improvement in ACR response criteria (ACR50) and 100% improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 100), ACR50, improvement in HAQ-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ≥0.35, minimal disease activity (MDA), European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good Response Criteria [improvement in Disease Activity Score 28 CRP (DAS28-CRP) >1.2], and Disease Activity in PsA (DAPSA) ≤14.

Results

There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between inadequate responders to one and two TNFi. At week 24, significantly more patients irrespective of previous TNFi experience receiving IXE than PBO achieved ACR50, HAQ-DI ≥0.35 improvement, MDA, EULAR good response, and DAPSA ≤14, and significantly more patients with inadequate response to one TNFi receiving IXE than PBO achieved ACR50 and PASI 100. Improvement persisted in all measures through week 52.

Conclusion

IXE improved the signs and symptoms of PsA in a population of difficult-to-treat patients with inadequate response to one or two TNFi.

Secukinumab Efficacy on Psoriatic Arthritis GRAPPA-OMERACT Core Domains in Patients with or Without Prior Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Use: Pooled Analysis of Four Phase 3 Studies

Background

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, heterogeneous, immune-mediated disease manifesting as a spectrum of possible inflammatory signs and symptoms. Clinicians need therapeutic choices that work across all active PsA disease domains, as well as practical information about efficacy of available treatments for individual domains in specific groups of patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) exposure on the efficacy of secukinumab across PsA core domains.

Methods

Data were pooled from 2049 participants with PsA in four phase 3 studies (FUTURE 2–5). Efficacy at week 16 was evaluated for each GRAPPA-OMERACT PsA core domain using nonresponder imputation for musculoskeletal disease activity and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index scores or as-observed data for other outcomes. For each measure, comparisons with placebo were made separately in the TNFi-naive and TNFi-inadequate responder/intolerant (TNF-IR) cohorts.

Results

Treatment with secukinumab improved PsA disease activity across all disease domains regardless of previous TNFi use, although TNFi-naive patients experienced numerically greater benefits in most outcomes. Among patients treated with secukinumab 300 mg, 41.5% and 24.4% of TNFi-naive patients (P < 0.05 vs placebo) and 18.6% and 9.0% of TNF-IR patients (nonsignificant vs placebo) experienced resolution in 66 swollen and 68 tender joint counts, respectively; additionally, 37.2% of TNFi-naive patients and 24.2% of TNF-IR patients achieved complete resolution of psoriasis at week 16 (all P < 0.05 vs placebo). Secukinumab effect sizes were generally larger in TNFi-naive vs TNF-IR patients for musculoskeletal and patient-reported domains.

Conclusions

Secukinumab demonstrated efficacy vs placebo across GRAPPA-OMERACT PsA core domains. Higher responses among TNFi-naive vs TNF-IR patients suggest that secukinumab should be considered for first-line use in PsA.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-021-00337-5.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a long-term disease that can affect a patient’s joints, skin, lower back, physical function, mental health, productivity, and other areas. Drugs called tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) can be used to treat PsA, although not all patients benefit from TNFis and many seek other treatment options. These patients, known as TNFi-inadequate responders (TNF-IR), have PsA that is difficult to treat. Another treatment option is secukinumab, a drug that blocks a molecule called interleukin-17 that is involved in PsA. Doctors need to know how different drugs work for treating PsA signs and symptoms in different groups of patients, including TNF-IR patients and those who have never received TNFis (TNFi-naive patients). This study used data from 2049 patients in four different PsA clinical trials (FUTURE 2–5) to see how well secukinumab worked at treating different signs and symptoms of PsA in TNFi-naive and TNF-IR patients. After 16 weeks of treatment, patients who took secukinumab saw greater improvements across all measured PsA signs and symptoms than those who took placebo. This was true for both TNFi-naive and TNF-IR patients. TNFi-naive patients seemed to benefit slightly more than TNF-IR patients—especially in their joint symptoms—although this study was not designed to judge the significance of these differences. These results suggest that secukinumab would be an effective first treatment option for patients with PsA. Since secukinumab improves the skin, joints, and other affected areas, it can be useful in treating the whole patient who has psoriatic disease.

Switch rates and total cost associated with apremilast and biologics in biologic-naive patients with psoriatic arthritis

Aim: Real-world treatment data for psoriatic arthritis are limited. We evaluated switch rates, adherence, and costs for patients initiating apremilast versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) and interleukin inhibitor (ILi) among biologic-naive psoriatic arthritis patients. Materials & methods: This retrospective analysis used IBM MarketScan claims data to assess treatment switches, adherence and costs. Results: Twelve-month switch rates were significantly lower for apremilast versus TNFi (15.5% vs 26.6%; p < 0.0001) and similar to ILi (15.5% vs 14.0%; p = 0.71). Apremilast initiators had lower total costs versus TNFi and ILi (US$39,854 vs US$57,243 and US$65,687; p < 0.05) and adherence was slightly lower versus TNFi and higher versus ILi. Conclusion: Biologic-naive apremilast initiators had lower switch rates versus TNFi initiators and lower total costs versus TNFi or ILi initiators.

Cycling or swap biologics and small molecules in psoriatic arthritis: Observations from a real-life single center cohort

ABSTRACT

During the last years there has been an increasing availability of drugs (biologics and small molecules) with different mechanisms of action (MoA) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). New issues about treatment strategies have arisen. The main aim of this study is to verify if there is a difference in terms of clinical efficacy (i.e. retention rate) between cycling (i.e. treating patients with the same MoA after the failure of the previous one) or swap (i.e choosing drugs with a MoA different from the failed previous one) strategies in PsA.In this mono-centric medical records review study, PsA patients treated with biologics, apremilast or tofacitinib were enrolled. Every prescription was clustered in three groups: cycling (CG), swap (SG) or first line group (1LG). Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox test estimated and compared drugs' retention rate in CG, SG and 1LG. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.One hundred eighty-three PsA patients were enrolled (9967 patient-months). In CG and 1LG the more prescribed drugs were tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (respectively 99% and 89%), in SG interleukin 17 inhibitor (60%). There were no differences in terms of sex, age, disease duration, and retention rate between CG and SG. The 18-months retention rate of 1LG, SG and CG was 77%, 60%, and 51% respectively. The CG retention rate was lower than in 1LG (P = .03).The findings of this study suggest that in PsA the swap strategy gives no remarkable advantage compared to cycling. However, patients undergoing swap strategy may experience the same failure rate observed in naives.

Pattern of drug use in patients with psoriatic arthritis in Italy: study in a real-world setting

Background: The aim of this study is to assess treatment patterns and pharmaco-utilization in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in Italy.Methods: A retrospective analysis using administrative databases of six Local Health Units was performed. All adult patients with PsA diagnosis and ≥1 prescription for biologic/targeted-synthetic (b/ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) from January 2010 to March 2017 were included. The date of first b/tsDMARD prescription was defined index-date. Follow-up lasted 1-year post index-date. Patients without b/tsDMARDs prescription pre index-date were defined bionaïve.Results: Of the 1,056 patients included, 33% received adalimumab, 30% etanercept, 10% golimumab, 9% secukinumab, 7% infliximab, 6% ustekinumab, 4% certolizumab, and 1% apremilast. During follow-up, persistence with b/tsDMARDs was observed in 79.8% of patients, 10.8% switched therapies, dose change occurred in 15.8% of patients, 47.4% received an add-on. Among bionaïve patients (n = 591), 67.0% were persistent with b/tsDMARDs, 10.1% switched therapy, 14.5% required a dose change and 45.8% an add-on. Discontinuation was observed in 10.6% of total PsA population and in 24.8% of bionaïve patients.Conclusion: This analysis provided insights on drug utilization patterns for PsA in an Italian real-world setting. Our results show that treatment regimen changes occur in a high proportion of PsA patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Ixekizumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis and Inadequate Response to TNF Inhibitors: 3-Year Follow-Up (SPIRIT-P2)

Purpose

Ixekizumab is a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin-17A. The objective of this study was to assess the long-term efficacy and safety (to week 156) of ixekizumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis and inadequate response or intolerance to one or two tumor necrosis factor inhibitors.

Methods

In the SPIRIT-P2 study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02349295), patients were randomized to placebo or ixekizumab 80 mg every 4 weeks (IXE Q4W) or every 2 weeks (IXE Q2W) following a 160-mg starting dose. During the extension period (weeks 24–156), patients maintained their original ixekizumab dose, and placebo patients received IXE Q4W or IXE Q2W (1:1). Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (IRs) per 100 patient-years (PY) are presented.

Results

Of 363 patients enrolled in the study, 310 entered the extension period. In all patients treated with IXE Q4W and IXE Q2W at week 0, responses persisted to week 156. At week 156, clinical responses (observed) in patients treated with IXE Q4W and IXE Q2W were assessed [American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria and minimal disease activity (MDA) criteria]: 84 and 85% showed 20% improvement (ACR20); 60 and 58% showed 50% improvement (ACR50); 35 and 47% showed 70% improvement (ACR70), respectively; and 48 and 54% showed MDA. Placebo patients re-randomized to ixekizumab also demonstrated sustained efficacy, as measured by ACR and MDA responses. In the All Ixekizumab Exposure Safety Population (n = 337), with 644 PY of ixekizumab exposure, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 286 patients (44.4 IR). The most common TEAEs were upper respiratory tract infection (9.80 IR), nasopharyngitis (8.2 IR), sinusitis (6.2 IR), and bronchitis (4.5 IR). Serious adverse events were reported by 42 (6.5 IR) patients (included 3 deaths and 10 infections).

Conclusion

In this 156-week study of ixekizumab, improvements in signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis and the safety profile remained consistent with those in previous reports.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02349295.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40744-020-00261-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Persistence on biologic DMARD monotherapy after achieving rheumatoid arthritis disease control on combination therapy: retrospective analysis of corrona registry data

Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) monotherapy may enhance adherence and decrease adverse events compared to combination therapy with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs); however, persistence with bDMARD monotherapy has not been extensively studied. We explore persistence of etanercept monotherapy and monotherapy with other tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) among patients first achieving remission/low disease activity (LDA) while on combination therapy with csDMARDs and a TNFi. Using Corrona registry data, the percentage of patients persistent with the index TNFi (etanercept versus other TNFis) over 6 and 12 months was determined. Factors influencing persistence and treatment patterns at 6 and 12 months were examined. Among 617 eligible patients, 56% of 182 patients on etanercept and 45% of 435 patients on other TNFis persisted with monotherapy at 6 months, 46% and 33%, respectively, at 12 months. Across first-line and subsequent biologic DMARDs, etanercept persistence was greater than other TNFi persistence by 10.8% (95% CI 2.1%, 19.6%) at 6 months and 11.4% (95% CI 0.9%, 21.9%) at 12 months. Patients on other TNFis were more likely to require reintroduction of csDMARD after 6 months (45% versus 35% for etanercept). Remission was the key predictor of persistence for both etanercept and other TNFi monotherapies. This retrospective, cohort study of registry data reflecting real-world practice indicates patients who achieve remission/LDA with combination csDMARD and TNFi therapy may successfully transition to TNFi monotherapy. Patients on etanercept monotherapy experienced greater persistence and less frequent reintroduction of a csDMARD than was observed for patients on other TNFi monotherapies.

Long-term effectiveness and safety of infliximab, golimumab and ustekinumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis from a Canadian prospective observational registry

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to describe the demographic profile and baseline disease characteristics of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treated with either infliximab (IFX), subcutaneous golimumab (GLM) or ustekinumab (UST) treatment in Canadian routine care setting along with assessing long-term effectiveness and safety.

METHODS

Patients with PsA were enrolled into the Biologic Treatment Registry Across Canada registry (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00741793) from 2005 to 2017. The study visits occurred at study enrolment (baseline) and every 6 months thereafter. Effectiveness was assessed by changes in disease parameters (joint counts, Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI), Health Assessment Questionnaire, patient/physician global, minimal disease activity, enthesitis, dactylitis, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C reactive protein). Improvements from baseline were explored with the paired t-test and the McNemar's test. Safety was evaluated by assessing the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and drug survival rates.

RESULTS

A total of 111 IFX-treated, 281 GLM-treated and 70 UST-treated patients were enrolled. Most baseline disease parameters remained similar over time in all three cohorts. UST-treated patients had lower mean baseline Disease Activity Score in 28 joints CRP, swollen joint based on 28 joints and higher PASI compared with patients treated with GLM. Treatment with IFX, GLM and UST was associated with significant improvements in all disease parameters over time (p<0.001) from baseline up to 84, 84 and 40 months, respectively.AEs were reported for 74.8%, 69.8% and 52.9% (138, 114 and 115 events/100 patient-years (PYs)) covering 325, 567 and 87 years of exposure for IFX-treated, GLM-treated and UST-treated patients, respectively. Severe AEs were reported in 19.8%, 8.5% and 5.7% (8.8, 7.2 and 8.0 events/100 PYs) in IFX-treated, GLM-treated and UST-treated patients, respectively. The proportion of patients who discontinued treatment were 63.1%, 50.9% and 50.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

IFX, GLM and UST treatment significantly reduced disease activity and improved functionality in patients with PsA followed by routine clinical practice and had a safety profile similar to that previously reported in the literature.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00741793.

Secukinumab Use in Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis in Real-World Setting in Europe: Baseline Data from SERENA Study

INTRODUCTION

Secukinumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that directly inhibits interleukin-17A, has demonstrated robust efficacy in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS), with a rapid onset of action, sustained long-term clinical responses and a consistently favourable safety profile across phase 3 trials. Here, we report the clinical data at enrolment from SERENA, designed to investigate the real-world use of secukinumab across all three indications.

METHODS

SERENA is an ongoing, longitudinal, observational study conducted at 438 sites across Europe in patients with moderate to severe plaque PsO, active PsA or active AS. Patients should have received at least 16 weeks of secukinumab treatment before enrolment in the study.

RESULTS

Overall 2800 patients were included in the safety set; patients with PsA (N = 541) were older than patients with PsO (N = 1799) and patients with AS (N = 460); patients with PsO had a higher mean body weight than patients with PsA and patients with AS; and patients with PsO and patients with AS were predominantly male. Time since diagnosis was longer in patients with PsO compared with patients with PsA and patients with AS, and about 40% of patients were either current or former smokers. The proportion of obese patients (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2) was similar across indications. Patients were treated with secukinumab for a mean duration of 1 year prior to enrolment (range 0.89-1.04). The percentages of patients with prior biologics exposure were 31.5% PsO, 59.7% PsA and 55% AS. The percentages of patients prescribed secukinumab monotherapy were 75% (n = 1349) in PsO, 48.2% (n = 261) in PsA and 48.9% (n = 225) in AS groups.

CONCLUSION

Baseline demographics of the study population are consistent with existing literature. This large observational study across all secukinumab indications will provide valuable information on the long-term effectiveness and safety of secukinumab in the real-world setting.

Real-World Patient Experience of Switching Biologic Treatment in Inflammatory Arthritis and Ulcerative Colitis - A Systematic Literature Review

PURPOSE

To obtain an up-to-date overview of the measurement of patient experience of switching biologic treatment in patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) or ulcerative colitis (UC). Secondary objectives included summarizing the types of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) used (if any), and related findings; and summarizing medical and non-medical reasons for treatment switch and/or discontinuation.

METHODS

A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed, searching Medline and Embase for relevant publications.

RESULTS

In total, 70 relevant publications were identified. While the majority of these reported reasons for switching and/or discontinuing treatment, only four provided information explicitly regarding patient-reported experience of switching biologic treatment. All four utilized ranking tools to assess patient experience of switching biologic treatment. The most common reason for switching and/or discontinuing treatment was loss of efficacy, while the least common reason was patient preference.

CONCLUSION

Although the number of available treatments in IA and UC have increased, there is a sparsity of information regarding patient-reported experience of switching biologic treatment. Further research regarding patient preference and/or experience would benefit this therapeutic area and help guide treatment choices.