Measurement properties of the minimal disease activity criteria for psoriatic arthritis

Association Between Achievement of Clinical Disease Control and Improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis in the Phase 3 SELECT-PsA 1 and 2 Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

We explored the relationship between achievement of clinical disease control and improvements in and normative values for patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including quality of life (QoL) measures, in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of 104-week data from the SELECT-PsA 1 and 2 trials in adults with PsA and inadequate response to one or more conventional synthetic (SELECT-PsA 1) or biologic (SELECT-PsA 2) disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. Patients were initially randomized to upadacitinib 15 mg once daily (QD) to placebo switched to upadacitinib 15 mg QD at week 24 or to adalimumab 40 mg every other week (SELECT-PsA 1 only), and data were pooled across treatments and analyzed. We evaluated several clinical disease control measures (minimal disease activity [MDA]; very low disease activity [VLDA]; and low disease activity [LDA] and/or remission by Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis [DAPSA], Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score [PASDAS], and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 [RAPID3]) and examined their associations with improvements and normative values for various PROs.

RESULTS

A total of 1,069 and 317 patients were analyzed for SELECT-PsA 1 and 2, respectively. In both studies, responders (patients who achieved MDA or VLDA, and DAPSA, PASDAS, and RAPID3 LDA or remission) at week 104 achieved more marked changes from baseline, and more responders achieved normative values in PROs compared with nonresponders (most nominal P < 0.0001). Furthermore, numerically larger proportions of responders achieved minimal clinically important differences across PROs compared with nonresponders in both studies. In addition, patients who achieved MDA or VLDA were more likely to achieve DAPSA, PASDAS, and RAPID3 LDA or remission (all nominal P < 0.0001) for upadacitinib 15 mg QD and when treatment arms were pooled.

CONCLUSION

Patients with PsA who achieve clinical disease control are more likely to achieve improvements and normative values in PROs and QoL measures, which reinforces disease control as a treatment target.

Psoriatic arthritis: improvement in outcomes but persistent sex difference - 5-year follow-up study of a Norwegian outpatient clinic population

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore long-term changes in disease activity and remission rates, and potential sex-related differences in these outcomes, in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients treated in an outpatient clinic.

METHOD

This prospective longitudinal cohort study included 114 patients. The Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), clinical DAPSA (cDAPSA), 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28), Simplified and Clinical Disease Activity Indices (SDAI, CDAI), Boolean remission for PsA, and minimal and very low disease activities (MDA, VLDA) were assessed. For group characteristics, parametric statistics and linear regression were used.

RESULTS

At 5 year follow-up, improvement was noted for multiple measures reflecting disease activity and patient-reported outcomes. Statistically significant increases in remission rates were observed using DAS28 (+21.2%), CDAI (+9.7%), and cDAPSA (+7.6%), but not SDAI, DAPSA, Boolean remission, MDA, or VLDA. During the study period, the proportion of patients treated with biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) increased from 37.7% to 48.3% (p = 0.007). At baseline, women reported higher pain and fatigue, and had higher tender joint counts, DAPSA, cDAPSA, SDAI, CDAI, and DAS28 than men. Despite higher mean baseline C-reactive protein, men more often achieved remission, regardless of the definition applied. A higher proportion of men than women was treated with bDMARDs (baseline: 46.6% vs 28.6%; follow-up: 58.6% vs 33.9%).

CONCLUSION

This study adds evidence supporting recent improvements in PsA outcomes. Women had higher disease activity and were less likely to achieve remission than men. Despite progress in achieving remission goals, there is still room for improvement in therapeutic approaches for PsA patients.

Management of psoriatic arthritis: a consensus opinion by expert rheumatologists

Background

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory musculoskeletal disease involving several articular and extra-articular structures. Despite the important progresses recently made in all of the aspects of this disease, its management is still burdened by unresolved issues. The aim of this exercise was to provide a set of statements that may be helpful for the management of PsA.

Methods

A group of 38 Italian rheumatologists with recognized expertise in PsA selected and addressed the following four topics: "early PsA," "axial-PsA," "extra-articular manifestations and comorbidities," "therapeutic goals." Relevant articles from the literature (2016-2022) were selected by the experts based on a PubMed search. A number of statements for each topic were elaborated.

Results

Ninety-four articles were selected and evaluated, 68 out of the 1,114 yielded by the literature search and 26 added by the Authors. Each of the four topic was subdivided in themes as follows: transition from psoriasis to PsA, imaging vs. CASPAR criteria in early diagnosis, early treatment for "early PsA"; axial-PsA vs. axialspondyloarthritis, diagnosis, clinical evaluation, treatment, standard radiography vs. magnetic resonance imaging for "axial PsA"; influence of inflammatory bowel disease on the therapeutic choice, cardiovascular comorbidity, bone damage, risk of infection for "comorbidities and extra-articular manifestations"; target and tools, treat-to-target strategy, role of imaging for "therapeutic goals." The final document consisted of 49 statements.

Discussion

The final product of this exercise is a set of statements concerning the main issues of PsA management offering an expert opinion for some unmet needs of this complex disease.

Peripheral spondyloarthritis: What have we learned?

The peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA) entity remains poorly defined in comparison with axial SpA and psoriatic arthritis, as the clinical symptoms have low specificity, the biological markers are virtually lacking, and dedicated randomized controlled trials in this specific indication remain scarce. In addition, clinical similarities between pSpA and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have been described, partly explained by a resemblance in the pathophysiology of both entities. Thus, diagnosing pSpA can be challenging because of the overlap with other entities and the absence of a specific test or imaging study that can definitively diagnose the condition. The aim of this review is to summarize the current understanding of pSpA, its epidemiology, physiopathology, clinical diagnosis, and classification criteria. In addition, we present patient-reported outcomes used in pSpA clinical studies, available evidence on therapies, and future directions.

Guselkumab provides sustained domain-specific and comprehensive efficacy using composite indices in patients with active psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab for the treatment of active PsA utilizing composite indices.

METHODS

Data were pooled from the phase 3 DISCOVER-1 (n = 381) and DISCOVER-2 (n = 739) studies. In both studies, patients were randomized 1:1:1 to subcutaneous guselkumab 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); guselkumab 100 mg at week 0, week 4, then Q8W; or placebo Q4W with crossover to guselkumab 100 mg Q4W at week 24. Composite indices used to assess efficacy through week 52 included Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS), minimal disease activity (MDA), and very low disease activity (VLDA). Through week 24, treatment failure rules were applied. Through week 52, non-responder imputation was used for missing data.

RESULTS

Greater proportions of guselkumab- than placebo-treated patients achieved DAPSA low disease activity (LDA) and remission, PASDAS LDA and VLDA, MDA, and VLDA at week 24 vs placebo (all unadjusted P < 0.05). At week 52, in the guselkumab Q4W and Q8W groups, respectively, response rates were as follows: DAPSA LDA, 54.2% and 52.5%; DAPSA remission, 18.2% and 17.6%; PASDAS LDA, 45.3% and 41.9%; PASDAS VLDA, 16.9% and 19.5%; MDA, 35.9% and 30.7%; and VLDA, 13.1% and 14.4%. In the placebo-crossover-to-guselkumab group, response rates for all composite indices increased after patients switched to guselkumab, from week 24 through week 52.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with guselkumab provided robust and sustained benefits across multiple PsA domains through 1 year, indicating that guselkumab is an effective therapy for the diverse manifestations of PsA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03162796; NCT03158285.

Minimal disease activity and remission in patients with psoriatic arthritis with elevated body mass index: an observational cohort study in the Swiss Clinical Quality Management cohort

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of elevated body mass index (BMI) in the achievement of minimal disease activity (MDA) and several definitions of remission in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in Switzerland. Secondarily, to assess the overlapping across the study outcomes.

METHODS

This observational cohort study in the Swiss Clinical Quality Management in Rheumatic Diseases (SCQM) registry included patients with PsA starting their first biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (b/tsDMARD) from 1997 to 30 June 2018. Exposure was BMI category at b/tsDMARD start: overweight, obese, and normal weight (reference). Logistic regression was used to assess the achievement of MDA and remission at ≤12 months, as well as treatment persistence at 1 year, in overweight patients and patients with obesity compared with the normal weight group. Remission was defined by Disease Activity for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), clinical DAPSA (cDAPSA) and 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28). Additionally, overlapping across study outcomes was investigated.

RESULTS

The study included 306 (39.5%) normal weight patients, 285 (36.8%) overweight patients and 183 (23.6%) patients with obesity. Compared with the normal weight group, patients with obesity had lower odds of achieving MDA at ≤12 months (adjusted OR (ORadj) 0.45, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.82). This was consistent with the observed reduced odds of achieving DAPSA-remission (ORadj 0.42, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.85), cDAPSA-remission (ORadj 0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.96) and DAS28-remission (ORadj 0.51, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.81) in patients with obesity versus normal weight patients. Among the 125 patients achieving MDA, the majority (81.8% normal weight, 80.0% overweight, 78.9% obese) achieved cDAPSA-remission. No differences were observed in the odds to achieving treatment persistence between the BMI strata.

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity halved the likelihood of achieving MDA and remission in patients with PsA with b/tsDMARDs compared with those with normal weight, while it did not impact treatment persistence. High overlapping of patients achieving the outcomes MDA and cDAPSA-remission was observed across every BMI group.

Ustekinumab Is Rapid-Acting and Is an Effective Long-Term Treatment for Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Real-World Evidence from the Non-interventional SUSTAIN Study

Introduction

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, progressive disease that places a significant burden on patients and healthcare systems. The SUSTAIN study collected real-world evidence on long-term effectiveness, impact on quality of life, and safety of ustekinumab treatment for PsA.

Methods

SUSTAIN was a prospective, non-interventional study conducted in Germany. Patients with active PsA received ustekinumab for 160 weeks in routine clinical care, with assessments at baseline, week 4, and every 12 weeks thereafter. This analysis focuses on patients who remained in SUSTAIN until week 160.

Results

Of 337 patients enrolled, 129 were documented at week 160, of which 123 (95.3%) had received previous PsA medication, including biologics. Decreases from baseline to week 4 were observed for tender joint count (TJC, 8.0 to 5.8) and swollen joint count (SJC, 4.5 to 3.1); these decreases continued to week 28 and were maintained to week 160 (1.0 and 0.4, respectively). Similarly, skin assessments in patients with PsA and psoriasis revealed improvement at week 4, which continued to week 28, with a sustained effect until week 160. Similar patterns of response were observed for patient-assessed pain, sleep quality, and health scores. Improvements in TJC, SJC, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, and affected body surface area were observed irrespective of the number of prior biologic therapies used. Minimal disease activity was achieved by 36 (31.9%) patients at week 28, and by 38 (33.6%) at week 52. Ustekinumab-related adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs were reported in 61 (47.3%) and 4 (3.1%) patients, respectively. At week 160, 100% of patients assessed ustekinumab tolerability as good or very good.

Conclusions

In a real-world setting, patients with active PsA who received ustekinumab until 160 weeks (3 years), including those who received prior biologic therapies, had a rapid onset of effect and sustained response to treatment, with high tolerability.

Trial registration

PEI NIS No. 290.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-022-00484-3.

Consensus statements for evaluation and nonpharmacological Management of Psoriatic Arthritis in UAE

OBJECTIVE

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA), a chronic inflammatory arthropathy, is often underdiagnosed in Middle Eastern countries, substantially impacting the treatment of affected individuals. This article aims to highlight current unmet clinical needs and provide consensus recommendations for region-specific evaluation methods and nonpharmacological therapies in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

METHOD

An extensive literature review was conducted, focusing especially on global and regional guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of PsA. These form the basis of the consensus statements formulated. Additionally, an expert panel of key opinion leaders from the UAE reviewed these guidelines and available literature at an advisory board meeting to identify unmet needs, bridge clinical gaps in the UAE, and develop consensus statements for the evaluation and treatment of PsA.

RESULT

The consensus statements were developed based on overarching principles for the management of PsA, evaluation of patients with PsA, and nonpharmacological approaches for the management of PsA. The overarching principles included adopting a targeted, multidisciplinary approach, along with collaboration between rheumatologists and dermatologists in cases of clinically significant skin involvement. The panel also highlighted the value of composite disease severity measures for characterizing clinical manifestations of PsA. In terms of nonpharmacological management approaches, lifestyle modification (comprising dietary change, exercise, and cessation of smoking) and psychotherapy were recommended.

CONCLUSION

The consensus statements will aid healthcare professionals in clinical decision-making in the context of PsA.

Psoriatic arthritis: prospects for the future

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a form of chronic inflammatory arthritis associated with psoriasis and a multitude of other symptoms, most commonly arthritis, dactylitis, enthesitis and axial involvement. PsA is significantly heterogeneous, with a highly variable clinical course of PsA. Patients may experience significant or mild skin and joint symptoms, with some patients developing rapidly progressing joint destruction and skin symptoms. Despite the range of symptom severity, PsA is frequently associated with significantly impaired quality of life from joint destruction, as well as chronic pain and a range of comorbidities such as depression and cardiovascular disease. Currently, there are no definitive diagnostic tests for PsA, with diagnosis remaining challenging owing to the heterogeneous presentation and course of the disease. Presently, the CASPAR criteria are often used to aid rheumatologists in distinguishing PsA from other inflammatory arthritides. Treatment options for patients have been expanded over the last two decades with the emerging clinical utility of biological therapies. However, early identification and diagnosis of patients and effective disease control remain unmet medical needs within the PsA community. In addition, predicting response to treatment also remains a challenge to rheumatologists. This review highlights the current hurdles faced by healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of PsA patients and provides future action points for consideration by the members of the multidisciplinary team who treat PsA patients.

The state of the art-psoriatic arthritis outcome assessment in clinical trials and daily practice

Psoriatic arthritis is a heterogeneous condition with substantial challenges in optimising outcome measures for both clinical trials and daily practice. As with other inflammatory arthritides, there is no gold standard instrument for measuring disease activity or impact, both of which are key to evaluate therapeutic approaches in trials and monitor disease in daily practice. A wide range of domains have been highlighted in the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) core domain set for psoriatic arthritis; reflecting the disease involvement in multiple tissues (joints, tendons, skin, and spine) and the heterogenous impact of the disease on individuals. This Review summarises the current evidence around outcome measure selection, considering factors such as unidimensional versus multidimensional outcomes, continuous versus binary measures, and the feasibility of these approaches in trials compared with clinical practice.

Outcome measures used in psoriatic arthritis registries and cohorts: A systematic literature review of 27 registries or 16,183 patients

INTRODUCTION

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a multidimensional inflammatory disease for which multiple outcome measures can be used to assess disease activity. In 2006, the OMERACT has proposed the first core domain set in PsA. Since 2006, much work has been performed on outcome measures in PsA.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess outcome measures collected in recent PsA registries or longitudinal cohorts.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed in Pubmed Medline (PROSPERO CRD42020175745) to identify all articles reporting on either registries or longitudinal cohorts in PsA, published between 2010 and March 2020. Registries centered on drugs or not PsA-specific, trials and long-term extension studies were excluded. The data collection comprised patient characteristics and the clinical outcome measures reported, including composite scores and patient reported outcomes (PROs). Statistics were descriptive.

RESULTS

Of 673 articles, 73 were analysed, reporting on 27 registries/cohorts. Overall, 16,183 patients were included, with a mean of 599 per study; 51% were men, weighted mean age was 49.7 ± 9.3 years and weighted mean disease duration was 6.8 ± 0.2 years. Overall, 58 different outcome measures were collected. Disease activity composite scores were used in 20/27 (74%) registries through 8 different scores (most frequently Minimal Disease Activity: 41%, DAS28: 33% and DAPSA: 30%). Among the domains of PsA, joint involvement was reported in 26/27 (96%) registries (through the 66/68 joint count: 85%) and skin psoriasis in 93% (through PASI: 72%), whereas enthesitis, dactylitis and axial involvement were less often reported (respectively, 77%, 74% and 52%). Furthermore, 22/27 (82%) studies reported HAQ; the other frequently reported PROs were patient global assessment (70%) and pain (63%).

CONCLUSIONS

Data collection in PsA is very heterogeneous, reflecting the need for international consensus on outcome measures.

Diagnosis, classification, and assessment in psoriatic arthritis

There have been considerable advances in the classification and assessment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). In this report, we give an overview of historic and current classification criteria and discuss its role and limitations in research and clinical practice. We discuss the most commonly used assessment instruments for arthritis, psoriasis, onychodystrophy, enthesitis, dactylitis and axial PsA with a focus on clinical practice. We pay particular attention to the current evidence for the use of composite outcome measures, and their use in randomised controlled trials and routine care.

Withdrawing Ixekizumab in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis Who Achieved Minimal Disease Activity: Results From a Randomized, Double-Blind Withdrawal Study

Objective

To evaluate the effect of withdrawing ixekizumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in whom minimal disease activity (MDA) has been achieved after open‐label ixekizumab treatment.

Methods

SPIRIT‐P3 was a multicenter, randomized, double‐blind withdrawal study of biologic treatment–naive adult patients with PsA who were treated with open‐label ixekizumab for 36 weeks (160 mg at week 0, then 80 mg every 2 weeks). Patients in whom MDA was sustained for >3 consecutive months were randomized 1:1, between weeks 36 and 64, to undergo blinded withdrawal of ixekizumab treatment (placebo) or to continue ixekizumab treatment every 2 weeks up to week 104. The primary efficacy end point was time to relapse (loss of MDA) for randomized patients. Patients who experienced a relapse were re‐treated with ixekizumab every 2 weeks up to week 104.

Results

A total of 394 patients were enrolled and received open‐label ixekizumab every 2 weeks. Of those patients, 158 (40%) achieved sustained MDA and were randomized to undergo withdrawal of ixekizumab treatment (placebo every 2 weeks; n = 79) or to continue ixekizumab treatment every 2 weeks (n = 79). Disease relapse occurred more rapidly with treatment withdrawal (median 22.3 weeks [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 16.1–28.3]) compared to those who continued treatment with ixekizumab (median not estimable; P < 0.0001). Sixty‐seven patients (85%) compared to 30 patients (38%) experienced relapse in the placebo group and the continued treatment group, respectively. Median time to achieving MDA again with re‐treatment was 4.1 weeks (95% CI 4.1–4.3); in 64 of 67 patients (96%) who experienced relapse with treatment withdrawal, MDA was achieved again with re‐treatment. Safety was consistent with the known safety profile for ixekizumab.

Conclusion

Continued ixekizumab therapy is superior to ixekizumab withdrawal in maintaining low disease activity in biologic treatment–naive patients with PsA. Re‐treatment with ixekizumab following a relapse may restore disease control in cases of treatment interruption.

Remission and low disease activity in psoriatic arthritis publications: a systematic literature review with meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Remission (REM) or low disease activity (LDA) is the treatment target in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The objective of this study was to assess the reporting and prevalence of REM/LDA in published studies of PsA.

METHODS

This was a systematic literature review of all clinical papers published in PubMed, EMBASE or Cochrane database in English between 2012 and 2019 in the field of PsA. Data were collected regarding reporting of REM/LDA by very low disease activity/minimal disease activity (VLDA/MDA), Disease Activity index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), or Disease Activity Score 28 joints (DAS28). The pooled rates of REM and LDA by each definition were calculated by random effect meta-analysis.

RESULTS

In all, 258 publications (corresponding to 114 651 patients), of which 81 (31%) were randomized controlled trials, were analysed: patients' mean age was 49.4 ( 4.4) years; with a mean disease duration of 8.5 ( 3.8) years. REM/LDA was reported in 91/258 (35.3%) publications. VLDA/MDA was used in 61/91 (67.0%) studies, DAPSA in 27/91 (29.6%) and DAS28 in 28/91 (30.7%), with 40/91 (43.9%) papers reporting several of these definitions. The pooled prevalence (lower-upper limits) of REM was 13.1% (10.9-15.4), 23.1% (16.8-30.1) and 42.1% (33.9-50.4) using VLDA, DAPSA-REM and DAS28, respectively. For LDA the pooled prevalence was 36.3% (32.3-40.5), 52.8% (41.8-63.6) and 60.4% (52.5-68.0) using MDA, DAPSA-LDA and DAS28, respectively.

CONCLUSION

REM/LDA status was reported in only1/3 of recent studies on PsA, with important variations in the frequency of these outcomes according to the definition used: 13.1-42.1% for REM, and 36.3-60.4% for LDA. This highlights the need for consensus.