Effect of nurse-led care on outcomes in patients with ACPA/RF-positive rheumatoid arthritis with active disease undergoing treat-to-target: a multicentre randomised controlled trial

[Delegation of medical duties to qualified rheumatology assistants : Effect on depression and anxiety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis]

BACKGROUND

At least 1 comorbidity occurs in 80% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In addition to cardiovascular comorbidities psychological comorbid conditions are common. The prevalence of depression and anxiety is higher in patients than in the general population. Screening for comorbidities is crucial. A shortage of outpatient specialist care barely allows resources for this. The implementation of team-based care holds the potential to improve the standard of care while simultaneously working against the shortage of care.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to examine the effects of care on the course of depression and anxiety in patients with seropositive RA and active disease.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A multicenter pragmatic randomized controlled trial was conducted over the course of 1 year with 224 patients. After baseline, five more visits followed. In the intervention group (IG), three were initially carried out by qualified rheumatological assistants. Depression, anxiety and patient satisfaction with outpatient care were looked at in detail.

RESULTS

In the IG the anxiety symptoms significantly improved over 12 months (p = 0.036). The proportions of patients with anxiety also significantly changed in the IG (p < 0.001), while there was no change in the control group between baseline and month 12. The values of the depression scale did not differ significantly (p = 0.866). In terms of the information dimension of the satisfaction questionnaire, patients in the IG felt significantly better informed after 6 months (p = 0.013) and 12 months (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

A positive effect of team-based care on the course of depression and anxiety in patients with seropositive RA and active disease could be shown.

Nurses' roles, interventions, and implications for management of rheumatic diseases

Nurses have become integral members of multidisciplinary teams in managing rheumatic diseases, departing from their traditional patient care roles. This article provides a comprehensive review of nurses' roles, interventions, and impacts in several rheumatic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, spondyloarthritis, gout, systemic lupus erythematosus, and polymyalgia rheumatica. It has been demonstrated that care under nursing supervision is effective and safe, with benefits including disease management, quality of life, and treatment adherence. In addition, nurses play a crucial role in promoting health, educating patients, and administering biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the significance of telehealth services and nurses' role in delivering remote care. However, nursing education and training challenges persist, particularly in standardization and access to postgraduate education. Efforts to enhance the role of nurses in rheumatology care are necessary to optimize patient outcomes and meet the evolving needs of individuals with rheumatic diseases. Collaboration across healthcare institutions, professional groups, and educational facilities is necessary for promoting the continual growth and advancement of rheumatology nurse practice. By equipping nurses with the requisite knowledge, expertise, and resources to deliver top-notch care, we can enhance the well-being of individuals with rheumatic diseases and foster improved overall health outcomes.

[Positive experiences of specialist assistants and physicians with respect to the delegation research project StaerkeR : Evaluation of the training and experiences within the framework of this project]

INTRODUCTION

The delegation of medical services to rheumatology assistants (RFA) has proven to be safe and effective in the evaluation of the research project "StaerkeR". Afterwards, the experiences of the participating RFAs and rheumatologists with delegation were surveyed and discussed within the framework of an opinion research project.

METHODS

At the end of the project, the participating RFAs and rheumatologists were surveyed via an online questionnaire (quantitative analysis) (21 questions for physicians and 44 questions for RFAs). In addition, focus group meetings were held for the RFAs, which were led by a moderator and a secretary. The results of the focus group sessions (qualitative analyses) were analyzed according to the structured method of Kuckartz.

RESULTS

All 31 RFAs and 25 rheumatologists involved in the project participated in the online surveys and 9 RFAs took part in the 2 focus groups. In the online surveys, both the RFAs and the rheumatologists gave predominantly good to very good ratings with respect to RFA training, the implementation of delegation in the practices and outpatient clinics, the role of the RFAs and the overall evaluation of the delegation concept. In the focus group discussions, many possible limitations regarding acceptance and implementation of the delegation concept were mentioned.

CONCLUSION

The delegation of medical tasks to RFAs is a concept that is positively assessed and highly accepted by both sides, the rheumatologists and the RFAs. In a comparison between the individual practices and hospital outpatient departments, there is still a clear heterogeneity with respect to the willingness and logistical possibilities in the implementation of the delegation concept.

Rheuma-VOR study: optimising healthcare of rheumatic diseases by multiprofessional coordinating centres

OBJECTIVES

Early diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis is critical to prevent joint damage and functional incapacities. However, the discrepancy between recommendations of early diagnosis and reality is remarkable. The Rheuma-VOR study aimed to improve the time to diagnosis of patients with early arthritis by coordinating cooperation between primary care physicians, specialists and patients in Germany.

METHODS

This prospective non-randomised multicentre study involved 2340 primary care physicians, 72 rheumatologists, 4 university hospitals and 4 rheumatology centres in 4 German Federal States. The two coprimary endpoints (time to diagnosis and screening performance of primary care physicians) were evaluated for early versus late implementation phase. Additionally, time to diagnosis and secondary endpoints (decrease of disease activity, increase in quality of life and overall well-being, improvement of fatigue, depression, functional ability, and work ability, reduction in drug and medical costs and hospitalisation) were compared with a reference cohort of the German Rheumatism Research Centre (DRFZ) reflecting standard care.

RESULTS

A total of 7049 patients were enrolled in the coordination centres and 1537 patients were diagnosed with a rheumatic disease and consented to further participation. A follow-up consultation after 1 year was realised in 592 patients. The time to diagnosis endpoint and the secondary endpoints were met. In addition, the calculation of cost-effectiveness shows that Rheuma-VOR has a dominant cost-benefit ratio compared with standard care.

DISCUSSION

Rheuma-VOR has shown an improvement in rheumatological care, patient-reported outcome parameters and cost savings by coordinating the cooperation of primary care physicians, rheumatologists and patients, in a nationwide approach.

Nurse-supported care versus rheumatologist-led care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis at high disease activity: A retrospective study of two Chinese centers

The European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis advised the involvement of clinical nurses for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. However, The European League Against Rheumatism recommendations are difficult to apply to Chinese institutes. In China, the rheumatology nursing service is not widely adopted because the feasibility and quality of rheumatology nursing service have not been confirmed in the Chinese population by the Chinese authorities. The objectives of the study were to compare 2.5 years clinical outcomes of patients of rheumatoid arthritis (6 months history) with disease activity score 28-joint count with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) > 5.1 who received nurse-supported care against those of patients who received rheumatologist-led care. Patients received 30 minutes/day and 6 times/week nurse-supported care (NC cohort, n = 127) or Patients had received 20 minutes session at every 3 months of conventional outpatient-based rheumatologist-led care (n = 131). Both types of care have involved the history of patients, care regarding effects and adverse effects of pharmacological treatments, patients education, overall well-being, everyday life, counseling, clarifications, and rehabilitation. Additionally, there were a cohort in which patients did not receive any nontreatment care (NN cohort, n = 141). All patients have definite depression and anxiety (hospital anxiety and depression scale Chinese version score ≥ 11) before nontreatment interventions. At 2.5 years of treatments with or without nontreatment interventions (EL) DAS28-CRP, depression, and anxiety scores of patients of the NC cohort were decreased as compared to their before any type of nontreatment interventions conditions and those of patients of the RC and NN cohorts at EL (P < .001 for all). At EL numbers of patients with moderate disease activity, (DAS28-CRP score: 3.2-5.1) and borderline depression and anxiety (hospital anxiety and depression scales Chinese version score: 8-10) were greater in the NC cohort than those of the RC and NN cohorts (P < .001 for all). Outpatient care satisfaction scores of patients of the NC cohort were higher than those of the RC [23 (27-17) vs 17 (21-14)] and NN [23 (7-17) vs 15 [18-12]) cohorts (P < .001 for both). Physiological and psychological conditions of patients with rheumatoid arthritis with DAS28-CRP > 5.1 are required to improve. Nurse-supported care is superior nontreatment compared to rheumatologist-led care in rheumatoid arthritis patients with high disease activity (Level of Evidence: IV; Technical Efficacy: Stage 5).

Nursing interventions for patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases on biological therapies: a systematic literature review

Investigating unmet needs and identifying the necessary interventions for patients affected by rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) may help significantly to ensure the continuity and quality of the chronic care pathway. To this aim, the contribution of rheumatology nurses requires further evidence. The aim of our systematic literature review (SLR) was to identify the nursing interventions directed towards patients with RMDs undergoing biological therapy. To retrieve data, a search was carried out in the MEDLINE database, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL database), the APA PsycINFO database and the Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE) from 1990 to 2022. The systematic review was carried out in accordance with the relevant PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (I) adult patients with RMDs, (II) undergoing therapy with Biological Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs), (III) original and quantitative research papers in English with available abstract, (IV) specific to nursing interventions and/or outcomes. Two independent reviewers screened the identified records for eligibility according to their title and abstract, full texts were subsequently assessed and, finally, data was extracted. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tools were used to evaluate the quality of the studies included. Among the 2348 records retrieved, 13 articles met the inclusion criteria. These consisted of six randomised controlled trials (RCTs), one pilot study and six observational studies on RMDs. In a total population of 2004 patients, 43% (862/2004) of the cases concerned rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and 56% (1122/2004) of the cases concerned spondyloarthritis (SpA). Three major nursing interventions were identified, namely education, patient-centred care and data collection/nurse monitoring, which were correlated with high satisfaction rates regarding care, increased self-care capacity and treatment adherence among patients. All interventions followed a protocol defined in collaboration with rheumatologists. The large degree of heterogeneity in the interventions did not allow the performance of a meta-analysis. Rheumatology nurses are part of a multidisciplinary team caring for patients with RMDs. Following an accurate initial nursing evaluation, rheumatology nurses can plan and standardise their interventions focusing primarily on patient education and personalised care based on actual needs, such as psychological well-being and disease control. However, the training for rheumatology nurses should define and standardise, as much as possible, the competencies required for the detection of disease parameters. Key Points • This SLR provides an overview of nursing interventions for patients with RMDs. • This SLR considers the specific population of patients on biological therapies. • Training for rheumatology nurses should standardise, as much as possible, the knowledge and methods required for detecting disease parameters. • This SLR highlights the various competencies of rheumatology nurses.

[Further development of regional early care-Many roads lead to Rome : Developmental stages of four established rheumatological early care concepts in different regions of Germany]

In order to shorten the prognostically relevant waiting time until diagnosis and initiation of appropriate treatment in inflammatory rheumatic diseases, rheumatological centers in many regions across Germany have established and continuously developed specific early care concepts. Evaluated models from Altötting·Burghausen, Berlin Buch, Düsseldorf and Heidelberg and their developmental stages as a response to internal and external challenges are presented in this overview. The transparent publication of the developmental steps and the exchange of experiences aim at promoting new early care concepts in other regions and continuing the joint dialogue for improvement of the early detection and quality of care of inflammatory rheumatic diseases in Germany.

Unmet Information Needs of Patients with Rheumatic Diseases: Results of a Cross-Sectional Online Survey Study in Germany

To effectively self-manage a chronic disease, patients require specific education. In clinical routines, rheumatologists and other healthcare professionals often cannot devote the necessary time to adequately educate their patients. Digital technologies such as mobile applications represent promising tools to overcome this problem. This study aims to identify unmet information needs of patients with rheumatic diseases to inform the conception of a mobile education application. An online national survey was developed together with rheumatic patients and rheumatologists and distributed between June and September 2021 via social media (Instagram, Facebook, Twitter), QR code and email. Self-reported rheumatic patients, rheumatologists, specialized rheumatology nurses (SRN) and self-reported relatives of rheumatic patients were eligible to participate in the survey. Three major topics were addressed: (1) How well do patients feel informed about disease-relevant topics; (2) how important do patients rate different disease-relevant topics; and (3) patient willingness to adopt digital education services. Responses of 254 patients and 53 SRN were analyzed. Most patients were female (91%; n = 231), the median age was 48 years and the most common disease was rheumatoid arthritis (23%; n = 59). Only 24% of patients perceived their disease education level as very good or good compared to an SRN estimate of 42%. The three information topics rated as most important (very/important) were: individual disease (98%), medication (94%) and coping techniques (91%). In total, 89% of patients asserted that they would very likely, likely or rather likely use digital education tools in the future to learn about their condition, and 82% of SRN would very likely, likely or rather likely recommend digital information services to their patients. These findings depict currently unmet patient information needs and a high willingness of patients and SRN to use digital education services. A mobile education application is currently adapted based on these results and will be evaluated in a multicenter study.

Trampisch H, Braun J. The Structured Delegation of Medical Care Services for Patients With Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases

BACKGROUND

In some areas of Germany, there is a shortage of specialist physicians for patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Delegating certain medical care services to qualified, specialized rheumatological assistants (SRAs) might be an effective way to supplement the available capacity for specialized medical care.

METHODS

Patients under stable treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) were included in this trial, which was designed to demonstrate, in a first step, the non-inferiority of a form of care involving delegation of physicians' tasks to SRAs (team-based care), in comparison to standard care, with respect to changes in disease activity at one year. "Non-inferiority," in this context, means either superiority or else an irrelevant extent of inferiority. In a second step, in case non-inferiority could be shown, the superiority of team-based care with respect to changes in patients' health-related quality of life would be tested as well. Disease activity was measured with the Disease Activity Score 28, and health-related quality of life with the EQ-5D-5L. This was a randomized, multicenter, rater-blinded trial with two treatment arms (team-based care and standard care). The statistical analysis was performed with mixed linear models (DRKS00015526).

RESULTS

From September 2018 to June 2019, 601 patients from 14 rheumatological practices and 3 outpatient rheumatological clinics in the German states of North Rhine-Westphalia and Lower Saxony were randomized to either team-based or standard care. Team-based care was found to be non-inferior to standard care with respect to changes in disease activity (adjusted difference = -0.19; 95% confidence interval [-0.36; -0.02]; p <0.001 for non-inferiority). Superiority with respect to health-related quality of life was not demonstrated (adjusted difference = 0.02 [-0.02; 0.05], p = 0.285).

CONCLUSION

Team-based care, with greater integration of SRAs, is just as good as standard care in important respects. Trained SRAs can effectively support rheumatologists in the care of stable patients with RA or PsA.

[Data analysis in rheumatology practices : Possibilities, limitations, and results]

Data analyses in rheumatology practices can be used as a feedback system in quality management. Implementation of a representative patient survey enables evaluation of one's own work and can be used for external presentation of the practice. Patient education and the structured use of specialist rheumatology assistants were evaluated by means of a survey. Systematic screening for depressive symptoms was carried out and enables a better understanding of patients and their "unmet needs". An analysis of the diseases and the patients in terms of physical function, disease activity, medication, and concomitant diseases is possible using structured patient documentation in a specialized documentation system. Within the RHADAR network (RheumaDatenRhePort G.b.R.), the proportion of rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with Janus kinase inhibitors was compared between different centers. Patients suitable for clinical trials can be filtered out of a structured documentation system.

Work situation of rheumatologists and residents in times of COVID-19 : Findings from a survey in Germany

Background and objective

The work situation is an important dimension of professional life and wellbeing, and a policy lever to strengthen recruitment and retention. This study aims to explore the work situation of physicians and residents in internal medical rheumatology, considering the impact of the coronavirus pandemic COVID-19.

Methods

A questionnaire-based online survey was conducted in early 2021 at the Hannover Medical School, supported by the German Society of Rheumatology. Target groups were all rheumatology physicians and residents in Germany. The main areas of investigation included work hours, task delegation, and collaboration; workload and mental health issues; discrimination and sexual harassment experiences; and the impact of COVID-19. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed for the standardized items and qualitative content analysis for the free-text information.

Results

The respondents (n = 101) expressed positive attitudes towards cooperation and task delegation to medical assistants, especially those specialized in rheumatology, while attitudes towards cooperation with GPs pointed to blockades. There was a strong mismatch between actual and desired work hours both in the group of women and in the group of men. 81% rated their workload as high or very high; every sixth rheumatologist has suffered from stress or burnout syndromes at least once in the past. Experiences of gender discrimination and sexual harassment/violence were frequently reported, mostly by women. COVID-19 was an amplifier of stress, with major stressors being digitalization and increased demand for communication and patient education.

Conclusion

There is an urgent need to improve the work situation of rheumatologists and reduce stress and mental health risks.

Supplementary Information

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00393-021-01081-5) includes the survey questionnaire in German.