1
|
Yu SP, van Middelkoop M, Deveza LA, Ferreira ML, Bierma‐Zeinstra S, Zhang W, Atchia I, Birrell F, Bhagavath V, Hunter DJ. Predictors of Placebo Response to Local (Intra-Articular) Therapy In Osteoarthritis: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2024; 76:208-224. [PMID: 37525486 PMCID: PMC10952328 DOI: 10.1002/acr.25212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We undertook this study to evaluate potential predictors of placebo response with intra-articular (IA) injections for knee/hip osteoarthritis (OA) using individual participant data (IPD) from existing trials. METHODS Randomized placebo-controlled trials evaluating IA glucocorticoid or hyaluronic acid published to September 2018 were selected. IPD for disease characteristics and outcome measures were acquired. Potential predictors of placebo response included participant characteristics, pain severity, intervention, and trial design. Placebo response was defined as at least a 20% reduction in baseline pain. Logistic regression models and odds ratios were computed as effect measures to evaluate patient and pain mechanisms and then pooled using a random effects model. Generalized mixed-effect models were applied to intervention and trial characteristics. RESULTS Of 56 eligible trials, 6 shared data, and these were combined with the existing 4 OA Trial Bank studies, yielding 10 studies with IPD of 621 placebo participants for analysis. In the total placebo population, at short-term follow-up, the use of local anesthetic and ultrasound guidance were associated with reduced odds of placebo response. At midterm follow-up, mid- to long-term trial duration was associated with increased odds of placebo response, and worse baseline function scores were associated with reduced odds of a placebo response. CONCLUSION The administration of local anesthetics or ultrasound guidance may reduce IA placebo response at short-term follow-up. At midterm follow-up, participants with worse baseline function scores may be less likely to respond to IA placebo, and mid- to long-term trial duration may enhance the placebo response. Further studies are required to corroborate these potential predictors of IA placebo response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shirley P. Yu
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The Kolling Institute, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, and Royal North Shore HospitalSt. LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
| | | | - Leticia A. Deveza
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The Kolling Institute, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, and Royal North Shore HospitalSt. LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Manuela L. Ferreira
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The Kolling Institute, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and HealthUniversity of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | | | - Weiya Zhang
- Academic Rheumatology, Injury, Inflammation and Recovery Sciences, University of Nottingham and City Hospital and Pain Centre Versus ArthritisUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| | - Ismaël Atchia
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Fraser Birrell
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust and Medical Research Council‐Versus Arthritis Centre for Integrated Research into Musculoskeletal AgeingNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Venkatsha Bhagavath
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The Kolling Institute, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, and Northern Sydney Local Health District, Royal North Shore HospitalSt. LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
| | - David J. Hunter
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The Kolling Institute, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, and Royal North Shore HospitalSt. LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim D, Bashrum BS, Kotlier JL, Mayfield CK, Thompson AA, Abu-Zahra M, Hwang M, Bolia IK, Petrigliano FA, Liu JN. Reporting Bias is Highly Prevalent in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Platelet Rich Plasma Injections for Hip Osteoarthritis. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2024; 6:100851. [PMID: 38299047 PMCID: PMC10827587 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose To describe the incidence and types of spin in systematic reviews of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections for hip osteoarthritis (OA) and to determine whether patterns in study characteristics could be identified among studies with identifiable spin. Methods The PubMed, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus databases were queried. Inclusion criteria were systematic reviews or meta-analyses that included an assessment of intra-articular PRP injections as a stand-alone treatment for hip OA. Two authors independently assessed the presence of spin in the included studies and recorded general study characteristics. The prevalence of the 15 different categories of spin was quantified using descriptive statistics. Results Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria for this study. All studies contained at least two types of spin (range 2-9), with a median of 2. The most common type of spin was type 14 ("Failure to report a wide confidence interval of estimates"), which was observed in 10 studies. The second most common type of spin was type 13 ("Failure to specify the direction of the effect when it favors the control intervention"), found in 6 studies. Conclusions Spin is highly prevalent in abstracts of systematic reviews of PRP in the treatment of hip OA. Several associations were found between spin types and the study characteristics of AMSTAR 2 rating, Scopus CiteScore, journal impact factor, and PROSPERO preregistration. When present, spin in the abstracts of reviewed studies tended to favor the use of PRP in hip osteoarthritis. Clinical Relevance It is important to understand the prevalence of spin in published abstracts, especially in areas of great impact or interest, so authors and readers can have a greater awareness of this potential form of bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Kim
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Bryan S. Bashrum
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Jacob L. Kotlier
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Cory K. Mayfield
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Ashley A. Thompson
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Maya Abu-Zahra
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Mina Hwang
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Ioanna K. Bolia
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Frank A. Petrigliano
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Joseph N. Liu
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Seo MR, Yeo J, Park JW, Lee YA, Lee JH, Kang EH, Ji SM, Kwon SR, Kim SK, Kim TJ, Kim TH, Kim HW, Park MC, Shin K, Lee SH, Lee EY, Cha HS, Shim SC, Yoon Y, Lee SH, Lim JH, Baek HJ. Korean treatment recommendations for patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Korean J Intern Med 2023; 38:620-640. [PMID: 37482652 PMCID: PMC10493447 DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2023.194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
We aimed to develop evidence-based recommendations for treating axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) in Korea. The development committee was constructed, key clinical questions were determined, and the evidence was searched through online databases including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, KoreaMed, and Kmbase. Systematic literature reviews were conducted, quality of evidence was determined, and draft recommendations were formulated according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations methodology. Recommendations that reached 80% consensus among a voting panel were finalized. Three principles and 21 recommendations were determined. Recommendations 1 and 2 pertain to treatment strategies, regular disease status assessment, and rheumatologist-steered multidisciplinary management. Recommendations 3 and 4 strongly recommend patient education, exercise, and smoking cessation. Recommendations 5-12 address pharmacological treatment of active disease using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, sulfasalazine, biologics, and Janus kinase inhibitors. Recommendations 13-16 address treatment in stable disease. We suggest against spa and acupuncture as therapies (Recommendation 17). Recommendations 18 and 19 pertain to total hip arthroplasty and spinal surgery. Monitoring of comorbidities and drug toxicities are recommended (Recommendations 20 and 21). Recommendations for axSpA treatment in a Korean context were developed based on comprehensive clinical questions and evidence. These are intended to guide best practice in the treatment of axSpA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mi Ryoung Seo
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon,
Korea
| | - Jina Yeo
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon,
Korea
| | - Jun Won Park
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Yeon-Ah Lee
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Ju Ho Lee
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam,
Korea
| | - Eun Ha Kang
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam,
Korea
| | - Seon Mi Ji
- National Health Insurance Service, Wonju,
Korea
| | - Seong-Ryul Kwon
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University College of Medicine. Incheon,
Korea
| | - Seong-Kyu Kim
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, Daegu,
Korea
| | - Tae-Jong Kim
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hospital, Gwangju,
Korea
| | - Tae-Hwan Kim
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Hye Won Kim
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam,
Korea
| | - Min-Chan Park
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Kichul Shin
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Sang-Hoon Lee
- Department of Rheumatology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Eun Young Lee
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Hoon Suk Cha
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Seung Cheol Shim
- Division of Rheumatology, Daejeon Rheumatoid & Degenerative Arthritis Center, Chungnam National University Hospital. Daejeon,
Korea
| | - Youngim Yoon
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Seung Ho Lee
- Korea Ankylosing Spondylitis Society, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Jun Hong Lim
- Korea Ankylosing Spondylitis Corporation, Daejeon,
Korea
| | - Han Joo Baek
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon,
Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Angotti ML, Burnett RA, Khalid S, Terhune EB, Della Valle CJ. Intra-articular corticosteroids associated with increased risk of total hip arthroplasty at 5 years. Hip Int 2023; 33:800-805. [PMID: 35722779 DOI: 10.1177/11207000221107225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intra-articular corticosteroid injections are commonly administered for hip pain. However, guidelines are conflicting on their efficacy, particularly in patients without arthritis. This study assessed for an association of corticosteroid injections and the incidence of total hip arthroplasty at 5 years. METHODS Patients with a diagnosis of hip pain without femoroacetabular osteoarthritis who were administered an intra-articular corticosteroid injection of the hip within a 2-year period were identified from the Mariner PearlDiver database. Patient were matched to patients with a diagnosis of hip pain who did not receive an injection. 5-year incidence of total hip arthroplasty was compared between matched patients who received an intra-articular corticosteroid injection and those who did not. RESULTS 2,540,154 patients diagnosed with hip pain without femoroacetabular arthritis were identified. 25,073 (0.9%) patients received a corticosteroid injection and were matched to an equal number of control patients. The incidence of total hip arthroplasty (THA) at 5-year-follow up was significantly higher for the corticosteroid cohort compared to controls (1.1% vs. 0.5%; p < 0.001). The incidence and risk of THA increased along with number of injections (1 injection: 0.8%, OR 1.37; 95% CI, 1.34-1.42; p < 0.001, 2 injections: 1.1%; OR 1.45; CI, 1.40-1.50; p < 0.001, ⩾3 injections: 1.5%; OR 1.48; CI, 1.40-1.56; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS There may be a dose-dependent association of corticosteroid injections and a greater risk of total hip arthroplasty at 5 years. These results along with the conflicting guidelines on the efficacy of intra-articular steroids for hip pain should prompt physicians to consider osteoarthritis progression that may occur in the setting of corticosteroid injections in non-arthritic hips.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Syed Khalid
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush LLC, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Seo MR, Yeo J, Park JW, Lee YA, Lee JH, Kang EH, Ji SM, Kwon SR, Kim SK, Kim TJ, Kim TH, Kim HW, Park MC, Shin K, Lee SH, Lee EY, Cha HS, Shim SC, Yoon Y, Lee SH, Lim JH, Baek HJ. Korean treatment recommendations for patients with axial spondyloarthritis. JOURNAL OF RHEUMATIC DISEASES 2023; 30:151-169. [PMID: 37476674 PMCID: PMC10351367 DOI: 10.4078/jrd.2023.0025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
We aimed to develop evidence-based recommendations for treating axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) in Korea. The development committee was constructed, key clinical questions were determined, and the evidence was searched through online databases including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, KoreaMed, and KMbase. Systematic literature reviews were conducted, quality of evidence was determined, and draft recommendations were formulated according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations methodology. Recommendations that reached 80% consensus among a voting panel were finalized. Three principles and 21 recommendations were determined. Recommendations 1 and 2 pertain to treatment strategies, regular disease status assessment, and rheumatologist-steered multidisciplinary management. Recommendations 3 and 4 strongly recommend patient education, exercise, and smoking cessation. Recommendations 5~12 address pharmacological treatment of active disease using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, sulfasalazine, biologics, and Janus kinase inhibitors. Recommendations 13~16 address treatment in stable disease. We suggest against spa and acupuncture as therapies (Recommendation 17). Recommendations 18 and 19 pertain to total hip arthroplasty and spinal surgery. Monitoring of comorbidities and drug toxicities are recommended (Recommendations 20 and 21). Recommendations for axSpA treatment in a Korean context were developed based on comprehensive clinical questions and evidence. These are intended to guide best practice in the treatment of axSpA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mi Ryoung Seo
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Jina Yeo
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Jun Won Park
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yeon-Ah Lee
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ju Ho Lee
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Eun Ha Kang
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Seon Mi Ji
- National Health Insurance Service, Wonju, Korea
| | - Seong-Ryul Kwon
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Seong-Kyu Kim
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Tae-Jong Kim
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Tae-Hwan Kim
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye Won Kim
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Min-Chan Park
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kichul Shin
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang-Hoon Lee
- Department of Rheumatology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Young Lee
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hoon Suk Cha
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Cheol Shim
- Division of Rheumatology, Daejeon Rheumatoid & Degenerative Arthritis Center, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Youngim Yoon
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Ho Lee
- Korea Ankylosing Spondylitis Society, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun Hong Lim
- Korea Ankylosing Spondylitis Corporation, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Han Joo Baek
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vágó J, Takács R, Kovács P, Hajdú T, van der Veen DR, Matta C. Combining biomechanical stimulation and chronobiology: a novel approach for augmented chondrogenesis? Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2023; 11:1232465. [PMID: 37456723 PMCID: PMC10349586 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1232465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The unique structure and composition of articular cartilage is critical for its physiological function. However, this architecture may get disrupted by degeneration or trauma. Due to the low intrinsic regeneration properties of the tissue, the healing response is generally poor. Low-grade inflammation in patients with osteoarthritis advances cartilage degradation, resulting in pain, immobility, and reduced quality of life. Generating neocartilage using advanced tissue engineering approaches may address these limitations. The biocompatible microenvironment that is suitable for cartilage regeneration may not only rely on cells and scaffolds, but also on the spatial and temporal features of biomechanics. Cell-autonomous biological clocks that generate circadian rhythms in chondrocytes are generally accepted to be indispensable for normal cartilage homeostasis. While the molecular details of the circadian clockwork are increasingly well understood at the cellular level, the mechanisms that enable clock entrainment by biomechanical signals, which are highly relevant in cartilage, are still largely unknown. This narrative review outlines the role of the biomechanical microenvironment to advance cartilage tissue engineering via entraining the molecular circadian clockwork, and highlights how application of this concept may enhance the development and successful translation of biomechanically relevant tissue engineering interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judit Vágó
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Histology and Embryology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Roland Takács
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Histology and Embryology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Patrik Kovács
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Histology and Embryology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Tibor Hajdú
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Histology and Embryology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Daan R. van der Veen
- Chronobiology Section, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom
| | - Csaba Matta
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Histology and Embryology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Foster NE, L E, L D, M H. Osteoarthritis year in review 2022: epidemiology & therapy. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2023:S1063-4584(23)00730-6. [PMID: 36963607 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2023.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2023]
Abstract
This 'Year in Review' provides a synopsis of key research themes and individual studies from the clinical osteoarthritis (OA) field, focused on epidemiology and therapy. The electronic database search for the review was adapted from the 2021 year in review search, to increase search specificity for relevant study designs, and was conducted in Medline, Embase and medRxiv (31st March 2021 to 4th March 2022). Following screening for eligibility, studies were grouped according to their key research design, including reviews, cohorts and randomised trials. 11 key themes emerged, including the importance of several comorbidities in predicting OA incidence and prevalence, surgical approaches that can reduce the risk of post-traumatic OA, the heterogenous but nevertheless relatively stable nature of OA subgroup trajectories, the paucity of robust studies particularly of surgery for OA and the very modest benefit of many therapies under evaluation in trials. A particular interest of the authors was to consider whether new studies are helping determine how to better ensure the right patient with OA is matched to the right treatment at the right time. There are several new studies developing improved predictive models through big data analytics and machine learning which show promise, need validation, and may support new approaches to stratified care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine E Foster
- STARS Education and Research Alliance, Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS), The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Eriksson L
- Lars Eriksson, The University of Queensland, UQ Library, Herston Qld 4006, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Deveza L
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Rheumatology, Northern Clinical School, Royal North Shore Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Hall M
- Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Moore A, Fisher E, Eccleston C. Flawed, futile, and fabricated-features that limit confidence in clinical research in pain and anaesthesia: a narrative review. Br J Anaesth 2023; 130:287-295. [PMID: 36369016 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.09.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The randomised controlled trial is the foundation of clinical research; yet there is concern that many trials have flaws in design, conduct, and reporting that undermine trustworthiness. Common flaws in trials include high risk of bias, small size, outcomes irrelevant to clinical care and patient's experience, and inability to detect efficacy even if present. These flaws carry forward into systematic reviews, which can confer the label of 'high-quality evidence' on inadequate data. Trials can be futile because their flaws mean that they cannot deliver any meaningful result in that different results in a small number of patients would be sufficient to change conclusions. Some trials have been discovered to be fabricated, the number of which is growing. The fields of anaesthesia and pain have more fabricated trials than other clinical fields, possibly because of increased vigilance. This narrative review examines these themes in depth whilst acknowledging an inescapable conclusion: that much of our clinical evidence is in trouble, and special measures are needed to bolster quality and confidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emma Fisher
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tarar MY, Malik RA, Charalambous CP. Bleeding complications in patients on warfarin undergoing joint injection/aspiration: systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatol Int 2023; 43:245-251. [PMID: 36322144 PMCID: PMC9898419 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-022-05232-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Steroid injections in joints are commonly administered for the management of inflammatory or degenerative conditions. There is substantial controversy as to whether to continue warfarin when undertaking joint injection or aspiration. To assess the rate of bleeding complications in patients on warfarin undergoing joint injection/aspiration. Systematic review and meta-analysis. A literature search of 3 online databases was conducted by 2 reviewers using the Cochrane methodology for systematic reviews. Eligibility criteria were any study that reported bleeding complication rates in adult patients on warfarin undergoing a joint injection/aspiration whilst taking warfarin anticoagulation. Studies reporting on less than 5 patients were excluded. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. The search of databases resulted in a total of 1547 articles. After screening, 8 articles were deemed suitable for inclusion in the analysis, involving 871 injection/aspiration procedures. There were only 5 reported cases of bleeding. On meta-analysis the estimated bleeding complication rate was 1.5% (95% CI 0.5-4.5%). This meta-analysis shows that it is safe to perform joint injection and aspiration in patients on warfarin without routine prior testing of INR. Level of evidence: Level 4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Y Tarar
- Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackpool, UK
| | - R A Malik
- Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.,University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - C P Charalambous
- Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackpool, UK. .,School of Medicine, University of Central, Lancashire, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ammitzbøll-Danielsen M, Terslev L. Optimizing the anti-inflammatory strategies in (osteo)arthritis: local or systemic? THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ITALIAN ASSOCIATION OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (AIMN) [AND] THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RADIOPHARMACOLOGY (IAR), [AND] SECTION OF THE SOCIETY OF... 2022; 66:311-318. [PMID: 35838028 DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.22.03477-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Arthritis is affecting millions of people globally, involvement and distribution depending on the type of arthritis. The most common arthritic conditions are osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite the pathogeneses being fundamentally different, both joint diseases share the same need for local treatment of synovitis. No current treatment can stop the progression of OA. Local articulate treatment including glucocorticoid (GC) injections, radiosynoviorthesis (RSO) and surgical synovectomy are the only options to relieve pain and temporally improve movability before surgical intervention. For RA, despite effective systemic treatments, similarly need for local articulate treatment is still present, especially early in the disease, but also in case of recurrent episodes of disease flare. Current evidence supports local GC injection as first line treatment for persistent synovitis in a single or a few joints. RSO provides an evident and effective alternative for GC refractory synovitis, especially in early RA. Surgical synovectomy is an invasive alternative, but with less documented efficacy. Whether one unsuccessful intraarticular GC injection is enough to change of mode of action for local treatment is still unclear and needs to be further investigated. In conclusion persistent single joint synovitis in OA and RA is well treated with local treatment. Intra-articular GC injection is considered as first line of treatment, but RSO provides an additional treatment alternative with less side effects and better evidence of efficacy than surgical synovectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mads Ammitzbøll-Danielsen
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Denmark -
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Rigshospitalet, Denmark -
| | - Lene Terslev
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cheleschi S, Tenti S, Lorenzini S, Seccafico I, Barbagli S, Frati E, Fioravanti A. Synovial Fluid Regulates the Gene Expression of a Pattern of microRNA via the NF-κB Pathway: An In Vitro Study on Human Osteoarthritic Chondrocytes. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23158334. [PMID: 35955467 PMCID: PMC9369022 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23158334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Synovial fluid (SF) represents the primary source of nutrients of articular cartilage and is implicated in maintaining cartilage metabolism. We investigated the effects of SF, from patients with osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and controls, on a pattern of microRNA (miRNA) in human OA chondrocytes. Cells were stimulated with 50% or 100% SF for 24 h and 48 h. Apoptosis and superoxide anion production were detected by cytometry; miRNA (34a, 146a, 155, 181a), cytokines, metalloproteinases (MMPs), type II collagen (Col2a1), antioxidant enzymes, B-cell lymphoma (BCL)2, and nuclear factor (NF)-κB by real-time PCR. The implication of the NF-κB pathway was assessed by the use of NF-κB inhibitor (BAY-11-7082). RA and OA SF up-regulated miR-34a, -146a, -155, -181a, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, MMP-1, MMP-13, and ADAMTs-5 gene expression, while it down-regulated Col2a1. Pathological SF also induced apoptosis, reduced viability, and decreased BCL2 mRNA, whereas it increased superoxide anions, the expression of antioxidant enzymes, p65 and p50 NF-κB. Opposite and positive results were obtained with 100% control SF. Pre-incubation with BAY-11-7082 counteracted SF effects on miRNA. We highlight the role of the SF microenvironment in regulating some miRNA involved in inflammation and cartilage degradation during OA and RA, via the NF-κB pathway.
Collapse
|
12
|
Intra-articular therapies: patient preferences and professional practices in European countries. Rheumatol Int 2021; 42:869-878. [PMID: 34761277 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-021-05045-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
To assess patient perspective and professional practice of intraarticular therapies (IATs) across Europe, an expert international multidisciplinary panel designed two open web-based surveys: one targeting people who had experienced at least two IATs (44 items); and one targeting health care providers (HCPs) (160 items). Surveys were disseminated via patient and professional associations and social media. A descriptive analysis was performed. The surveys were answered by 200 patients and 186 HCPs from 26 countries, showing that IAT is routinely performed by rheumatologists (97%) and orthopaedic surgeons (89%), with specific training being compulsory in a few countries. The most frequent indications for IAT are arthritis (76%), osteoarthritis (74%), crystal arthritis (71%) and bursitis (70%); the most frequently injected joints are knee (78%) and shoulder (70%); and the most used compounds are glucocorticoids. The majority of HCPs report informing patients about side-effects (73%), benefits (72%), and the nature of the procedure (72%), which coincides with 27% of patients reporting that they had not been informed about benefits or potential complications of IATs; 73% of patients had not been asked whether they wanted an anaesthetic. Few HCPs (10%) obtain written consent (56% get oral consent, being mandatory for 32%), a procedure deemed necessary by 41% of the patients. 50% of patients reported a clear benefit of IAT and 20% experienced complications including pain, impaired mobility, rashes, or swelling. In summary, the practice of IAT is variable across Europe, and although patients perceive it as relatively safe and usually effective procedure, some gaps were identified.
Collapse
|
13
|
Uson J, Rodriguez-García SC, Castellanos-Moreira R, O'Neill TW, Doherty M, Boesen M, Pandit H, Möller Parera I, Vardanyan V, Terslev L, Kampen WU, D'Agostino MA, Berenbaum F, Nikiphorou E, Pitsillidou IA, de la Torre-Aboki J, Carmona L, Naredo E. EULAR recommendations for intra-articular therapies. Ann Rheum Dis 2021; 80:1299-1305. [PMID: 34035002 PMCID: PMC8458067 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To establish evidence-based recommendations to guide health professionals using intra-articular therapies (IAT) in adult patients with peripheral arthropathies. METHODS A multidisciplinary international task force established the objectives, users and scope and the need for background information, including systematic literature reviews) and two surveys addressed to healthcare providers and patients throughout Europe. The evidence was discussed in a face-to-face meeting, recommendations were formulated and subsequently voted for anonymously in a three-round Delphi process to obtain the final agreement. The level of evidence was assigned to each recommendation with the Oxford levels of evidence. RESULTS Recommendations focus on practical aspects to guide health professionals before, during and after IAT in adult patients with peripheral arthropathies. Five overarching principles and 11 recommendations were established, addressing issues related to patient information, procedure and setting, accuracy, routine and special aseptic care, safety issues and precautions to be addressed in special populations, efficacy and safety of repeated joint injections, use of local anaesthetics and aftercare. CONCLUSION We have developed the first evidence and expert opinion-based recommendations to guide health professionals using IAT. We hope that these recommendations will be included in different educational programmes, used by patient associations and put into practice via scientific societies to help improve uniformity and quality of care when performing IAT in peripheral adult joints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Uson
- Rheumatology Deptarment, Hospital Universitario Móstoles, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Raul Castellanos-Moreira
- Rheumatology Department, Centre Sociosanitari Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Terence W O'Neill
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Michael Doherty
- Acaedemic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Mikael Boesen
- Musculoskeletal research Unit, Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hemant Pandit
- Orthopaedic Surgery, Chapel Allerton Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Valentina Vardanyan
- Rheumatology Department, Yerevan State Medical University Named after Mkhitar Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Lene Terslev
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Willm Uwe Kampen
- Nuclear Medicine Spitalerhof, Radiologische Allianz, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maria-Antonietta D'Agostino
- Rheumatology Department, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Elena Nikiphorou
- Rheumatology Research, Acaedemic Department of Rheumatology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Irene A Pitsillidou
- EULAR Patient Research Partner, Cyprus League Against Rheumatism, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | | | - Loreto Carmona
- Instituto de Salud Musculoesquelética (INMUSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Esperanza Naredo
- Rheumatology Department and Joint and Bone Research Unit, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|