COVID-19 outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs

Rheumatoid arthritis and COVID-19 outcomes: a systematic review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive systematic literature review and meta-analysis to assess the risk and outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed across four electronic databases. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle‒Ottawa quality assessment scale and the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA 14 software.

RESULTS

A total of 62 studies were included in the analysis. First, the meta-analysis revealed the following prevalence rates among rheumatoid arthritis patients: COVID-19, 11%; severe COVID-19, 18%; COVID-19-related hospitalization, 29%; admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to COVID-19, 10%; and death from COVID-19, 8%. Second, rheumatoid arthritis was associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 infection (OR 1.045(0.969-1.122), p = 0.006), COVID-19-related hospitalization (OR 1.319(1.055-1.584), p = 0.006), admission to the ICU due to COVID-19 (OR 1.498(1.145-1.850), p = 0.002), and death from COVID-19 (OR 1.377(1.168-1.587), p = 0.001). Third, no statistically significant association was found between rheumatoid arthritis and severe COVID-19 (OR 1.354(1.002-1.706), p = 0.135).

CONCLUSIONS

Rheumatoid arthritis patients have a significantly greater risk of COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, ICU admission, and death than individuals without rheumatoid arthritis. However, rheumatoid arthritis did not show a significant association with the risk of severe COVID-19. These findings underscore the need for tailored management strategies and vigilant monitoring of COVID-19 outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

The study has been registered on PROSPERO [ https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ ], and the registration number is CRD42024528119.

Abatacept versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors on mortality and medical utilizations in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease: a large-scale real-world retrospective cohort study

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease, and interstitial lung disease is one of the important extra-articular manifestations. There is limited evidence comparing abatacept (ABA) and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) regarding the risk of mortality among patients with rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). The aim of this study is to investigate the risk of mortality in patients with RA-ILD treated with ABA compared to TNFi. This retrospective cohort study utilized TriNetX electronic health record database. We enrolled patients who were diagnosed with RA-ILD and had received a new prescription for either ABA or TNFi. Patients were categorized into two cohorts based on their initial prescription. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes were healthcare utilizations, including hospitalization, critical care services, and mechanical ventilation. Subgroup analyses were performed on age, presence of anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA), and cardiovascular risk. Among 34,388 RA-ILD patients, 895 were selected for each group (ABA and TNFi) following propensity score matching. The ABA group exhibited a higher all-cause mortality risk. (HR 1.296, 95% CI 1.006-1.671). Subgroup analysis showed a heightened risk of receiving mechanical ventilation in ABA-treated patients aged 18-64 years old (HR 1.853, 95% CI 1.002-3.426), and those with cardiovascular risk factors (HR 2.015, 95% CI 1.118-3.630). Another subgroup analysis indicated a higher risk of mortality among ABA-treated patients with positive-ACPA. (HR 4.138 95% CI 1.343-12.75). This real-world data research demonstrated a higher risk of all-cause mortality in RA-ILD patients treated with ABA compared to TNFi, particularly those aged 18-64 years, lacking cardiovascular risk factors, and positive-ACPA. ABA was associated with an increased risk of mechanical ventilation in patients aged 18-64 years and those with cardiovascular risk factors.

Effect of methotrexate hold on COVID-19 vaccine response in the patients with autoimmune inflammatory disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Immunosuppressants, such as methotrexate (MTX), can suppress the COVID-19 vaccine response in patients with autoimmune diseases. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the effects of MTX hold following COVID-19 vaccination on vaccine efficacy response. A systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies retrieved from Web of Science, SCOPUS, PubMed, and CENTRAL from inception until Oct 1, 2023, was conducted. Covidence was used to screen the eligible articles, and all relevant outcomes data were synthesized using risk ratios (RRs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in meta-analysis models within RevMan 5.4. PROSPERO ID: CRD42024511628. Four studies with a total of 762 patients with autoimmune inflammatory disorders were included. Holding MTX following the COVID-19 vaccination for approximately 2 weeks was associated with significantly higher antibody titer (SMD: 0.70, 95% CI [0.54, 0.87], P < 0.00001). However, the flare rate was significantly higher in the MTX hold group based on CDAI > 10 or DAS28-CRP > 1.2 either after 1st dose (RR: 2.49 with 95% CI [1.39, 4.47], P = 0.002) or 2nd dose (RR: 2.16 with 95% CI [1.37, 3.41], P = 0.0009) and self-reported disease flare (RR: 1.71 with 95% CI [1.35, 2.17], P < 0.00001). Holding MTX for 2 weeks after the COVID-19 vaccination resulted in significantly higher antibody titer but also had a higher disease flare rate, necessitating cautious clinical monitoring during this period. There is still a need to investigate safer MTX hold duration, considering patients' vulnerability to COVID-19, disease status, and demographics while adopting this strategy.