Genetics of aspirin induced asthma

Risk assessment of the asthma-induction potential of substances in spray products for car cabin detailing - based on EU's Chemical Agents Directive, using harmonised classifications and quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR)

Exposure to spray-formulated products for car cabin detailing is a potential risk for asthma induction. With a focus on the asthma-related endpoints sensitisation and irritation of the lungs, we performed an occupational risk assessment based on requirements in the EU Chemical Agents Directive. We identified 71 such spray products available in Denmark. We identified ingredient substances in safety data sheets and screened for harmonised classifications of respiratory sensitisation and airway irritation. For respiratory sensitisation, we also applied quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR). We modelled the exposure during 15 min of work inside a car cabin, and determined the risk ratio of the products by further applying occupational exposure limits - mainly derived no-effect levels (DNELs) from the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) set on respiratory irritation. Four substances had a harmonised classification for respiratory irritation (bronopol, 2-phenoxyethanol, 2-methoxypropanol, and butan-1-ol). Seven substances were positive in the QSAR model for respiratory sensitisation (monoethanolamine, bronopol, glycerol, methyl salicylate, benzoic acid, ammonium benzoate, and sodium benzoate). Two vinyl treatment products had a risk ratio > 1 based on the level of sodium benzoate and its DNEL set on respiratory irritation. Two products had risk ratios of 0.69 and 0.73, respectively, based on 2-methyl-2 H-isothiazol-3-one and its acute DNEL set on respiratory irritation. In conclusion, 10 substances that may pose a risk for asthma induction were identified in the products. Two of the 71 products had a risk ratio > 1, meaning they may pose an asthma-induction risk in the modelled exposure scenario and using respiratory irritation DNELs from ECHA.

Asthma-inducing potential of 28 substances in spray cleaning products-Assessed by quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) testing and literature review

Exposure to spray cleaning products constitutes a potential risk for asthma induction. We set out to review whether substances in such products are potential inducers of asthma. We identified 101 spray cleaning products for professional use. Twenty‐eight of their chemical substances were selected. We based the selection on (a) positive prediction for respiratory sensitisation in humans based on quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) in the Danish (Q)SAR Database, (b) positive QSAR prediction for severe skin irritation in rabbits and (c) knowledge on the substances' physico‐chemical characteristics and toxicity. Combining the findings in the literature and QSAR predictions, we could group substances into four classes: (1) some indication in humans for asthma induction: chloramine, benzalkonium chloride; (2) some indication in animals for asthma induction: ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), citric acid; (3) equivocal data: hypochlorite; (4) few or lacking data: nitriloacetic acid, monoethanolamine, 2‐(2‐aminoethoxy)ethanol, 2‐diethylaminoethanol, alkyldimethylamin oxide, 1‐aminopropan‐2‐ol, methylisothiazolinone, benzisothiazolinone and chlormethylisothiazolinone; three specific sulphonates and sulfamic acid, salicylic acid and its analogue sodium benzoate, propane‐1,2‐diol, glycerol, propylidynetrimethanol, lactic acid, disodium malate, morpholine, bronopol and benzyl alcohol. In conclusion, we identified an asthma induction potential for some of the substances. In addition, we identified major knowledge gaps for most substances. Thus, more data are needed to feed into a strategy of safe‐by‐design, where substances with potential for induction of asthma are avoided in future (spray) cleaning products. Moreover, we suggest that QSAR predictions can serve to prioritise substances that need further testing in various areas of toxicology.

We reviewed whether substances in spray cleaning products constitute a potential risk for asthma induction. For this, we identified 101 spray cleaning products for professional use and prioritised their ingredient substances by use of quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR). We provide a review of 28 selected substances: we give conclusions on their asthma induction potential, as well as a discussion on the use of QSAR for prioritisation of substances, and the major knowledge gaps we encountered.

[Physiopathology of aspirin intolerant asthma]

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) refers to the development of bronchoconstriction in individuals with asthma following the ingestion of aspirin. AERD affects up to 20 % of adults with asthma. At present, no reliable in vitro test is available to confirm the diagnosis. The confirmation of the diagnosis of AERD therefore depends on the response to challenge testing with aspirin. The pathogenesis of AERD is linked to abnormalities in arachidonic acid metabolism. Prior to exposure to aspirin, respiratory mucosal inflammation is the result of a cell infiltration, an overproduction of leukotrienes, prostaglandins D2, 5-oxo-eicosatetraenoic acid and an underproduction of lipoxins. After aspirin ingestion, patients with AERD synthesize excessive amounts of cysteinyl leukotrienes and prostaglandin metabolites involved in bronchoconstriction. New hypotheses concerning AERD pathogenesis have been added to the initial cyclooxygenase theory. These propose that AERD may be linked to the complement system, adenosine metabolism or angiotensin converting enzyme gene and IgE receptor gene polymorphisms.

Association of the variants in AGT gene with modified drug response in Korean aspirin-intolerant asthma patients

The angiotensinogen (AGT) gene enhances the effect of several bronchoconstrictors and produces a peptide that is accumulated in the airways of asthma patients; events that may underpin the pathogenesis of aspirin-intolerant asthma (AIA). To carry out a case-control analysis between AGT and aspirin-induced bronchospasm following treatment with an anti-asthma drug, montelukast (MLK), 38 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in AGT were genotyped in 56 AIA cohort. Genotyping was performed with TaqMan assay and haplotypes were inferred using PHASE algorithm ver. 2.0. Statistical analyses of each SNPs and haplotypes were performed using SAS version 9.1. Among 13 variants displaying significant signals, two SNPs (+2401C>G and +2476C>T) in the intronic region of AGT were significantly associated with modification of drug response even after correction for multiple testing (P=0.0009-0.002; P(corr)=0.02-0.03). Furthermore, the two variants also exhibited associations with MLK response rate (P=0.0003-0.0006; P(corr)=0.006-0.01). Although our results are preliminary and further replication in a larger-scale group of subjects should be warranted, these observations provide evidence that AGT variants might be one of genetic factors involved in the response of anti-asthma drugs in AIA patients.

Aspirin-exacerbated asthma

: This review focuses on aspirin-exacerbated asthma (AEA). The review includes historical perspective of aspirin, prevalence, pathogenesis, clinical features and treatment of AEA. The pathogenesis of AEA involves the cyclooxygenase and lipooxygenase pathway. Aspirin affects both of these pathways by inhibiting the enzyme cycooxygenase-1 (COX-1). Inhibition of COX-1 leads to a decrease in prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). The decrease in PGE2 results in an increase in cysteinyl leukotrienes by the lipooxygenase pathway involving the enzyme 5-lipooxygenase (5-LO). Leukotriene C4 (LTC4) synthase is the enzyme responsible for the production of leukotriene C4, the chief cysteinyl leukotriene responsible for AEA. There have been familial occurences of AEA. An allele of the LTC4 synthase gene in AEA is known as allele C. Allele C has a higher frequency in AEA. Clinical presentation includes a history of asthma after ingestion of aspirin, nasal congestion, watery rhinorrhea and nasal polyposis. Treatment includes leukotriene receptor antagonists, leukotriene inhibitors, aspirin desinsitaztion and surgery. AEA is the most well-defined phenotype of asthma. Although AEA affects adults and children with physician-diagnosed asthma, in some cases there is no history of asthma and AEA often goes unrecognized and underdiagnosed.

Effect of leukotriene modifier drugs on the safety of oral aspirin challenges

BACKGROUND

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease can be diagnosed with oral aspirin challenges and treated with aspirin desensitization.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether controller medications, particularly leukotriene modifier drugs, taken during oral aspirin challenges can reduce the risk of severe asthmatic responses.

METHODS

The medical records of 676 patients who had undergone oral aspirin challenges, followed by aspirin desensitization, were reviewed. Asthmatic responses were stratified based on severity of bronchospastic response or lack of response. The effect of pretreatment with controller medications on the outcome of oral aspirin challenges was measured.

RESULTS

Leukotriene modifier drugs had the most significant effect in protecting the lower airways from severe reactions (P = .004). The protective effect of leukotriene modifier drugs was observed in patients already taking systemic corticosteroids, where the addition of leukotriene modifier drugs significantly shifted the response toward a milder asthmatic response (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Protection from significant aspirin-induced bronchospasm during oral aspirin challenge can be accomplished with leukotriene modifier drugs. The use of a combination of inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting beta-agonists, systemic corticosteroids, and leukotriene modifier drugs stabilized underlying airways in preparation for a reasonably safe and accurate oral aspirin challenge. However, only pretreatment with leukotriene modifier drugs enhanced the safety of oral aspirin challenge in patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease by significantly decreasing the degree of asthmatic responses. Therefore, outpatient oral aspirin challenges in most well-selected patients appear to be a reasonable decision.

Breaking new ground: challenging existing asthma guidelines

BACKGROUND

While we have international guidelines and various national guidelines for asthma diagnosis and management, asthma remains poorly controlled in many children and adults. In this paper we review the limitations of current asthma guidelines and describe important issues and remaining questions regarding asthma guidelines for use, particularly in primary care.

DISCUSSION

Clinical practice guidelines based on evidence from randomized controlled trials are considered the most rigorous and accurate. Current evidence-based guidelines are written predominantly from the perspective of the patient with a clear-cut asthma diagnosis, however, and tend not to consider the heterogeneity of asthma or to accommodate individual patient variations in response to treatment or their needs, differences in practice settings, or local differences in availability and cost of therapies. The results of randomized controlled trials, which are designed to establish efficacy of treatment under ideal conditions, may not apply to 'real-world' clinical practice, where patients are unselected, monitoring is less frequent, and effectiveness--the benefit of treatment in routine clinical practice--is the most relevant outcome. Moreover, most guidelines see asthma in isolation rather than considering other factors that may impact on asthma and response to asthma therapy, particularly age, allergic rhinitis, cigarette smoking, adherence, and genetic factors. When these links are recognized, guidelines rarely provide practical recommendations for treatment in these scenarios. Finally, there is some evidence that general practitioners are not convinced of the applicability of asthma guidelines to their practice settings, especially when those writing the guidelines principally work in specialist practice.

CONCLUSION

Developing country-specific guidelines or, ideally, local guidelines could provide more practical solutions for asthma care and could account for regional factors that influence patient choice and adherence to therapy. Pragmatic clinical trials and well-designed observational trials are needed in addition to randomized controlled trials to assess real-world effectiveness of therapies, and such evidence needs also to be considered by guideline writers. Finally, practical tools to facilitate the diagnosis and assessment of asthma and factors responsible for poor control, such as associated allergic rhinitis, limited adherence, and smoking behavior, are needed to supplement treatment information provided in clinical practice guidelines for asthma.

The mechanisms, diagnosis, and management of severe asthma in adults

There has been a recent increase in the prevalence of asthma worldwide; however, the 5-10% of patients with severe disease account for a substantial proportion of the health costs. Although most asthma cases can be satisfactorily managed with a combination of anti-inflammatory drugs and bronchodilators, patients who remain symptomatic despite maximum combination treatment represent a heterogeneous group consisting of those who are under-treated or non-adherent with their prescribed medication. After excluding under-treatment and poor compliance, corticosteroid refractory asthma can be identified as a subphenotype characterised by a heightened neutrophilic airway inflammatory response in the presence or absence of eosinophils, with evidence of increased tissue injury and remodelling. Although a wide range of environmental factors such as allergens, smoking, air pollution, infection, hormones, and specific drugs can contribute to this phenotype, other features associated with changes in the airway inflammatory response should be taken into account. Aberrant communication between an injured airway epithelium and underlying mesenchyme contributes to disease chronicity and refractoriness to corticosteroids. The importance of identifying underlying causative factors and the recent introduction of novel therapeutic approaches, including the targeting of immunoglobulin E and tumour necrosis factor alpha with biological agents, emphasise the need for careful phenotyping of patients with severe disease to target improved management of the individual patient's needs.

The prevalence of ibuprofen-sensitive asthma in children: a randomized controlled bronchoprovocation challenge study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of ibuprofen-sensitive asthma in school-aged children with mild or moderate persistent asthma.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover bronchoprovocation challenge study in children 6 to 18 years of age with mild or moderate persistent asthma. Patients received a single dose of ibuprofen or placebo, per randomization, and then returned 2 to 7 days later to repeat the procedures after taking that study drug not received at the first visit. At each visit, patients performed spirometry before and (1/2), 1, 2, and 4 hours after administration of study drug. We defined bronchospasm as a > or =20% decrease from baseline in the forced expired volume in the first second (FEV1) and ibuprofen sensitivity as bronchospasm following administration of ibuprofen but not placebo.

RESULTS

Of the 127 patients screened, 100 (mean age, 11 years) completed the study. Two patients met criteria for ibuprofen-sensitive asthma, resulting in a prevalence of 2% (95% CI: 0.2%-7%). Neither patient was known to have had any exposure to ibuprofen before the study.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of ibuprofen-sensitive asthma was low but non-zero in this group of children with mild or moderate asthma. The possibility of ibuprofen-induced bronchospasm should be considered before administering ibuprofen to children with asthma.

Aspirin-induced asthma: clinical aspects, pathogenesis and management

Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid)-induced asthma (AIA) consists of the clinical triad of asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, and precipitation of asthma and rhinitis attacks in response to aspirin and other NSAIDs. The prevalence of the syndrome in the adult asthmatic populations is approximately 4-10%. Respiratory disease in these patients may be aggressive and refractory to treatment. The aetiology of AIA is complex and not fully understood, but most evidence points towards an abnormality of arachidonic acid (AA) metabolism. Cyclo-oxygenase (COX), the rate-limiting enzyme in AA metabolism, exists as two main isoforms. COX-1 is the constitutive enzyme responsible for synthesis of protective prostanoids, whereas COX-2 is induced under inflammatory conditions. A number of theories regarding its pathogenesis have been proposed. The shunting hypothesis proposes that inhibition of COX-1 shunts AA metabolism away from production of protective prostanoids and towards cysteinyl leukotriene (cys-LT) biosynthesis, resulting in bronchoconstriction and increased mucus production. The COX-2 hypothesis proposes that aspirin causes a structural change in COX-2 that results in the generation of products of the lipoxygenase pathway. It is speculated that this may result in the formation of mediators that cause respiratory reactions in AIA. Related studies provide evidence for abnormal regulation of the lipoxygenase pathway, demonstrating elevated levels of cys-LTs in urine, sputum and peripheral blood, before and following aspirin challenge in AIA patients. These studies suggest that cys-LTs are continually and aggressively synthesised before exposure to aspirin and, during aspirin-induced reactions, acceleration of synthesis occurs. A genetic polymorphism of the LTC4S gene has been identified consisting of an A to C transversion 444 nucleotides upstream of the first codon, conferring a relative risk of AIA of 3.89. Furthermore, carriers of the C444 allele demonstrate a dramatic rise in urinary LTE(4) following aspirin provocation, and respond better to the cys-LT antagonist pranlukast than A444 homozygotes.AIA patients have an aggressive form of disease, and treatment should include combination therapy with inhaled corticosteroids, beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists and LT modifiers. Furthermore, recently developed inhibitors of COX-2 may be safer in patients with AIA.

A new combined test with flowcytometric basophil activation and determination of sulfidoleukotrienes is useful for in vitro diagnosis of hypersensitivity to aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

BACKGROUND

We assessed whether nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may provoke blood basophil activation in vitro in aspirin- and NSAID-hypersensitive patients, as detected by a flowcytometric technique using the CD63 marker--flowcytometric basophil activation test (FAST) assay--in addition to the sulfidoleukotriene (sLT) release--the cellular allergen stimulation test (CAST).

METHODS

Sixty aspirin- and/or NSAID-hypersensitive patients were studied. Thirty control patients without history and negative provocation challenge were also included. The percentage of activated basophils after in vitro stimulation with NSAIDs at 3 different concentrations was evaluated by an anti-CD63 phycoerythrin conjugate (FAST assay) and the amount of sLTs released in the cell supernatant by ELISA (CAST assay).

RESULTS

For aspirin, the FAST indicated a sensitivity of 41.7%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 99.4%; for paracetamol 11.7 and 100%, for metamizol 15 and 100%, for diclofenac 43.3 and 93.3%, and for naproxen 54.8 and 74.1%. Many patients showed positive tests to more than 1 NSAID. When considering the first 4 NSAIDs, the global sensitivity increased to 66.7%, while the specificity remained at 93.3%. The addition of the CAST results still increased the sensitivity up to 73.3%, but with a decrease of the specificity to 71.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

The FAST shows a high percentage of positive reactions, which may reach 60-70% when 4 NSAIDs are tested and even 88% when the test is performed within 1 month of the last clinical drug exposure and reaction. The test has a high specificity above 90%. The addition of sLT determinations yields additional information in a few isolated cases. It is suggested that this test, when properly used, may help avoid some cumbersome and dangerous provocation challenges.

Pathogenesis of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease

The underlying respiratory disease is activated by unknown mechanism and results in an intense infiltration of mast cells and eosinophils into the entire respiratory mucosa. These cells synthesize leukotrienes (LTs) at a very high rate and mast cells also release histamine and tryptase and synthesize PGD(2) a vasodilator and bronchoconstrictor. Furthermore, AERD patients under synthesize from arachidonic acid (AA) a peculiar product called lipoxins, which opposes inflammation generated by leukotrienes. Finally, cysLT1 receptors are over expressed and highly responsive to LTE(4), further augmenting the underlying inflammatory disease. This inflammatory condition is partly inhibited by synthesis of PGE(2) through COX-1. PGE(2) partially inhibits 5-lipogygenase conversion of AA to LTA(4) and blocks release of histamine and tryptase from mast cells. When COX-l is inhibited by ASA or NSAIDs, PGE(2) synthesis stops and an enormous release of histamine and synthesis of LTs occurs. The upper respiratory reaction is mediated by both histamine and LTs but the bronchospastic reaction is mediated by LTs. The systemic effects of flush, gastric pain and hives are mediated by histamine. Aspirin desensitization can not be explained by disappearance of LT synthesis since urine LTE(4) levels are still elevated at acute ASA desensitization. However, mast cell products such as histamine, tryptase and PGD(2) are no longer released or synthesized at acute desensitization. It is more likely that a diminution in number or function of cysLT receptors accounts for the diminished inflammatory response found in ASA desensitization.

Leukotriene modifiers

Leukotrienes (LTs) are 5-lipoxygenase products formed from arachidonic acid metabolism. There is compelling evidence that LTs play an important role in the pathogenesis of asthma. LTs affect vascular permeability, mucus production, and smooth muscle constriction, and may contribute to airway remodeling. In mild-to-moderate asthma, LT modifiers improve measures of airflow limitation and quality of life and reduce the frequency of asthma exacerbations and the need for short-acting bronchodilator therapy. In moderate-to-severe asthma, an LT modifier in combination with an inhaled corticosteroid results in improvements in lung function and asthma control over that achieved with an inhaled corticosteroid alone. LT modifiers are effective in the treatment of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and aspirin-induced asthma. There are few adverse effects of LT modifiers.