Efficacy and safety of lower versus higher CO2 extraction devices to allow ultraprotective ventilation: secondary analysis of the SUPERNOVA study

Is there still a place for ECCO2R?

The therapeutic target of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) is the elimination of carbon dioxide (CO2) from the blood across a gas exchange membrane without influencing oxygenation to a clinically relevant extent. In acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), ECCO2R has been used to reduce tidal volume, plateau pressure, and driving pressure ("ultraprotective ventilation"). Despite achieving these goals, no benefits in outcome could be shown. Thus, in ARDS, the use of ECCO2R to achieve ultraprotective ventilation can no longer be recommended. Furthermore, ECCO2R has also been used to avoid intubation or facilitate weaning in obstructive lung failure as well as to avoid mechanical ventilation in patients during bridging to lung transplantation. Although these goals can be achieved in many patients, the effects on outcome still remain unclear due to lack of evidence. Despite involving less blood flow, smaller cannulas, and smaller gas exchange membranes compared with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ECCO2R bears a comparable risk of complications, especially bleeding. Trials to define indications and analyze the risk-benefit balance are needed prior to implementation of ECCO2R as a standard therapy. Consequently, until then, ECCO2R should be used in clinical studies and experienced centers only. This article is freely available.

Effects of extracorporeal CO2 removal on gas exchange and ventilator settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) on gas exchange and respiratory settings in critically ill adults with respiratory failure.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive database search, including observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from January 2000 to March 2022, targeting adult ICU patients undergoing ECCO2R. Primary outcomes were changes in gas exchange and ventilator settings 24 h after ECCO2R initiation, estimated as mean of differences, or proportions for adverse events (AEs); with subgroup analyses for disease indication and technology. Across RCTs, we assessed mortality, length of stay, ventilation days, and AEs as mean differences or odds ratios.

RESULTS

A total of 49 studies encompassing 1672 patients were included. ECCO2R was associated with a significant decrease in PaCO2, plateau pressure, and tidal volume and an increase in pH across all patient groups, at an overall 19% adverse event rate. In ARDS and lung transplant patients, the PaO2/FiO2 ratio increased significantly while ventilator settings were variable. "Higher extraction" systems reduced PaCO2 and respiratory rate more efficiently. The three available RCTs did not demonstrate an effect on mortality, but a significantly longer ICU and hospital stay associated with ECCO2R.

CONCLUSIONS

ECCO2R effectively reduces PaCO2 and acidosis allowing for less invasive ventilation. "Higher extraction" systems may be more efficient to achieve this goal. However, as RCTs have not shown a mortality benefit but increase AEs, ECCO2R's effects on clinical outcome remain unclear. Future studies should target patient groups that may benefit from ECCO2R. PROSPERO Registration No: CRD 42020154110 (on January 24, 2021).

Current knowledge gaps in extracorporeal respiratory support

Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for acute respiratory failure encompasses veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) and extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R). V-V ECMO is primarily used to treat severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), characterized by life-threatening hypoxemia or ventilatory insufficiency with conventional protective settings. It employs an artificial lung with high blood flows, and allows improvement in gas exchange, correction of hypoxemia, and reduction of the workload on the native lung. On the other hand, ECCO2R focuses on carbon dioxide removal and ventilatory load reduction ("ultra-protective ventilation") in moderate ARDS, or in avoiding pump failure in acute exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clinical indications for V-V ECLS are tailored to individual patients, as there are no absolute contraindications. However, determining the ideal timing for initiating extracorporeal respiratory support remains uncertain. Current ECLS equipment faces issues like size and durability. Innovations include intravascular lung assist devices (ILADs) and pumpless devices, though they come with their own challenges. Efficient gas exchange relies on modern oxygenators using hollow fiber designs, but research is exploring microfluidic technology to improve oxygenator size, thrombogenicity, and blood flow capacity. Coagulation management during V-V ECLS is crucial due to common bleeding and thrombosis complications; indeed, anticoagulation strategies and monitoring systems require improvement, while surface coatings and new materials show promise. Moreover, pharmacokinetics during ECLS significantly impact antibiotic therapy, necessitating therapeutic drug monitoring for precise dosing. Managing native lung ventilation during V-V ECMO remains complex, requiring a careful balance between benefits and potential risks for spontaneously breathing patients. Moreover, weaning from V-V ECMO is recognized as an area of relevant uncertainty, requiring further research. In the last decade, the concept of Extracorporeal Organ Support (ECOS) for patients with multiple organ dysfunction has emerged, combining ECLS with other organ support therapies to provide a more holistic approach for critically ill patients. In this review, we aim at providing an in-depth overview of V-V ECMO and ECCO2R, addressing various aspects of their use, challenges, and potential future directions in research and development.

Enhanced extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal by acidification and metabolic control

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) promotes protective ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure, but devices with high CO2 extraction capacity are required for clinically relevant impact. This study evaluates three novel low-flow techniques based on dialysate acidification, also combined with renal replacement therapy, and metabolic control.

METHODS

Eight swine were connected to a low-flow (350 mL/min) extracorporeal circuit including a dialyzer with a closed-loop dialysate circuit, and two membrane lungs on blood (MLb) and dialysate (MLd), respectively. The following 2-hour steps were performed: 1) MLb-start (MLb ventilated); 2) MLbd-start (MLb and MLd ventilated); 3) HLac (lactic acid infusion before MLd); 4) HCl-NaLac (hydrochloric acid infusion before MLd combined with renal replacement therapy and reinfusion of sodium lactate); 5) HCl-βHB-NaLac (hydrochloric acid infusion before MLd combined with renal replacement therapy and reinfusion of sodium lactate and sodium 3-hydroxybutyrate). Caloric and fluid inputs, temperature, blood glucose and arterial carbon dioxide pressure were kept constant.

RESULTS

The total MLs CO2 removal in HLac (130±25 mL/min), HCl-NaLac (130±21 mL/min) and HCl-βHB-NaLac (124±18 mL/min) were higher compared with MLbd-start (81±15 mL/min, P<0.05) and MLb-start (55±7 mL/min, P<0.05). Minute ventilation in HLac (4.3±0.9 L/min), HCl-NaLac (3.6±0.8 L/min) and HCl-βHB-NaLac (3.6±0.8 L/min) were lower compared to MLb-start (6.2±1.1 L/min, P<0.05) and MLbd-start (5.8±2.1 L/min, P<0.05). Arterial pH was 7.40±0.03 at MLb-start and decreased only during HCl-βHB-NaLac (7.35±0.03, P<0.05). No relevant changes in electrolyte concentrations, hemodynamics and significant adverse events were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The three techniques achieved a significant extracorporeal CO2 removal allowing a relevant reduction in minute ventilation with a sufficient safety profile.

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal in the critically ill using the PrismaLung+ device

BACKGROUND

Several extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) devices are currently in use with variable efficacy and safety profiles. PrismaLung+ is an ECCO2R device that was recently introduced into clinical practice. It is a minimally invasive, low flow device that provides partial respiratory support with or without renal replacement therapy. Our aim was to describe the clinical characteristics, efficacy, and safety of PrismaLung+ in patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure.

METHODS

All adult patients who required ECCO2R with PrismaLung+ for hypercapnic respiratory failure in our intensive care unit (ICU) during a 6-month period between March and September 2022 were included.

RESULTS

Ten patients were included. The median age was 55.5 (IQR 41-68) years, with 8 (80%) male patients. Six patients had acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and two patients each had exacerbations of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). All patients were receiving invasive mechanical ventilation at the time of initiation of ECCO2R. The median duration of ECCO2R was 71 h (IQR 57-219). A significant improvement in pH and PaCO2 was noted within 30 min of initiation of ECCO2R. Nine patients (90%) survived to weaning of ECCO2R, eight (80%) survived to ICU discharge and seven (70%) survived to hospital discharge. The median duration of ICU and hospital stays were 14.5 (IQR 8-30) and 17 (IQR 11-38) days, respectively. There were no patient-related complications with the use of ECCO2R. A total of 18 circuits were used in ten patients (median 2 per patient; IQR 1-2). Circuit thrombosis was noted in five circuits (28%) prior to reaching the expected circuit life with no adverse clinical consequences.

CONCLUSION(S)

PrismaLung+ rapidly improved PaCO2 and pH with a good clinical safety profile. Circuit thrombosis was the only complication. This data provides insight into the safety and efficacy of PrismaLung+ that could be useful for centres aspiring to introduce ECCO2R into their clinical practice.

Safety and Effectiveness of Carbon Dioxide Removal CO2RESET Device in Critically Ill Patients

BACKGROUND

In this retrospective study, we report the effectiveness and safety of a dedicated extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂R) device in critically ill patients.

METHODS

Adult patients on mechanical ventilation due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or decompensated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (dCOPD), who were treated with a dedicated ECCO₂R device (CO2RESET, Eurosets, Medolla, Italy) in case of hypercapnic acidemia, were included. Repeated measurements of CO₂ removal (VCO₂) at baseline and 1, 12, and 24 h after the initiation of therapy were recorded.

RESULTS

Over a three-year period, 11 patients received ECCO₂R (median age 60 [43-72] years) 3 (2-39) days after ICU admission; nine patients had ARDS and two had dCOPD. Median baseline pH and PaCO₂ levels were 7.27 (7.12-7.33) and 65 (50-84) mmHg, respectively. With a median ECCO₂R blood flow of 800 (500-800) mL/min and maximum gas flow of 6 (2-14) L/min, the VCO₂ at 12 h after ECCO₂R initiation was 157 (58-183) mL/min. Tidal volume, respiratory rate, and driving pressure were significantly reduced over time. Few side effects were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, a dedicated ECCO₂R device provided a high VCO₂ with a favorable risk profile.

Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal With the Hemolung in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO 2 R) devices are effective in reducing hypercapnia and mechanical ventilation support but have not been shown to reduce mortality. This may be due to case selection, device performance, familiarity, or the management. The objective of this study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of a single ECCO 2 R device (Hemolung) in patients with acute respiratory failure and identify variables associated with survival that could help case selection in clinical practice as well as future research.

DESIGN

Multicenter, multinational, retrospective review.

SETTING

Data from the Hemolung Registry between April 2013 and June 2021, where 57 ICUs contributed deidentified data.

PATIENTS

Patients with acute respiratory failure treated with the Hemolung. The characteristics of patients who survived to ICU discharge were compared with those who died. Multivariable logistical regression analysis was used to identify variables associated with ICU survival.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of the 159 patients included, 65 (41%) survived to ICU discharge. The survival was highest in status asthmaticus (86%), followed by acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (52%) and COVID-19 ARDS (31%). All patients had a significant reduction in Pa co2 and improvement in pH with reduction in mechanical ventilation support. Patients who died were older, had a lower Pa o2 :F io2 (P/F) and higher use of adjunctive therapies. There was no difference in the complications between patients who survived to those who died. Multivariable regression analysis showed non-COVID-19 ARDS, age less than 65 years, and P/F at initiation of ECCO 2 R to be independently associated with survival to ICU discharge (P/F 100-200 vs <100: odds ratio, 6.57; 95% CI, 2.03-21.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant improvement in hypercapnic acidosis along with reduction in ventilation supports was noted within 4 hours of initiating ECCO 2 R. Non-COVID-19 ARDS, age, and P/F at commencement of ECCO 2 R were independently associated with survival.

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal for acute respiratory failure: a review of potential indications, clinical practice and open research questions

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂R) is a form of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) largely aimed at removing carbon dioxide in patients with acute hypoxemic or acute hypercapnic respiratory failure, so as to minimize respiratory acidosis, allowing more lung protective ventilatory settings which should decrease ventilator-induced lung injury. ECCO₂R is increasingly being used despite the lack of high-quality evidence, while complications associated with the technique remain an issue of concern. This review explains the physiological basis underlying the use of ECCO₂R, reviews the evidence regarding indications and contraindications, patient management and complications, and addresses organizational and ethical considerations. The indications and the risk-to-benefit ratio of this technique should now be carefully evaluated using structured national or international registries and large randomized trials.

Invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome receiving extracorporeal support: a narrative review of strategies to mitigate lung injury

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is indicated in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and severely impaired gas exchange despite evidence-based lung protective ventilation, prone positioning and other parts of the standard algorithm for treating such patients. Extracorporeal support can facilitate ultra-lung-protective ventilation, meaning even lower volumes and pressures than standard lung-protective ventilation, by directly removing carbon dioxide in patients needing injurious ventilator settings to maintain sufficient gas exchange. Injurious ventilation results in ventilator-induced lung injury, which is one of the main determinants of mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Marked reductions in the intensity of ventilation to the lowest tolerable levels under extracorporeal support may be achieved and could thereby potentially mitigate ventilator-induced lung injury and theoretically patient self-inflicted lung injury in spontaneously breathing patients with high respiratory drive. However, the benefits of this strategy may be counterbalanced by the use of continuous deep sedation and even neuromuscular blocking drugs, which may impair physical rehabilitation and impact long-term outcomes. There are currently a lack of large-scale prospective data to inform optimal invasive ventilation practices and how to best apply a holistic approach to patients receiving veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, while minimising ventilator-induced and patient self-inflicted lung injury. We aimed to review the literature relating to invasive ventilation strategies in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome receiving extracorporeal support and discuss personalised ventilation approaches and the potential role of adjunctive therapies in facilitating lung protection.

Long term feasibility of ultraprotective lung ventilation with low-flow extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal in ARDS patients

PURPOSE

To explore the feasibility of long-term application of ultraprotective ventilation with low flow ECCO₂R support in moderate-severe ARDS patients and the reduction of mechanical power (MP) compared to lung protective ventilation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

ARDS patients with PaO₂/FiO₂ < 200, PEEP of 10 cmH₂O, tidal volume 6 ml/Kg of predicted body weight (PBW), plateau pressure > 24 cmH₂O, MP > 17 J/min were prospectively enrolled. After 2 h tidal volume was reduced to 4-5 ml/kg, respiratory rate (RR) and PEEP were changed to maintain similar minute ventilation and mean airway pressure (MAP) to those obtained at baseline. After 2 h, ECCO₂R support was started, RR was decreased and PEEP was increased to maintain similar PaCO₂ and MAP, respectively.

RESULTS

The only reduction of tidal volume with the increase in RR did not decrease MP. The application of low flow ECCO₂R support allowed a reduction of RR from 25 [24-30] to 11 [9-14] bpm and MP from 18 [13-23] to 8 [7-11] J/min. During the following 5 days no changes in mechanics variables and gas exchange occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of low flow ECCO₂R support with ultraprotective ventilation was feasible minimizing the MP without deterioration in oxygenation in ARDS patients.

Venovenous extracorporeal CO2 removal to support ultraprotective ventilation in moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

BACKGROUND

A strategy that limits tidal volumes and inspiratory pressures, improves outcomes in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂R) may facilitate ultra-protective ventilation. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of venovenous ECCO₂R in supporting ultra-protective ventilation in moderate-to-severe ARDS.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were interrogated for studies (2000-2021) reporting venovenous ECCO₂R use in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS. Studies reporting ≥10 adult patients in English language journals were included. Ventilatory parameters after 24 h of initiating ECCO₂R, device characteristics, and safety outcomes were collected. The primary outcome measure was the change in driving pressure at 24 h of ECCO₂R therapy in relation to baseline. Secondary outcomes included change in tidal volume, gas exchange, and safety data.

RESULTS

Ten studies reporting 421 patients (PaO₂:FiO₂ 141.03 mmHg) were included. Extracorporeal blood flow rates ranged from 0.35-1.5 L/min. Random effects modelling indicated a 3.56 cmH₂O reduction (95%-CI: 3.22-3.91) in driving pressure from baseline (p < .001) and a 1.89 mL/kg (95%-CI: 1.75-2.02, p < .001) reduction in tidal volume. Oxygenation, respiratory rate and PEEP remained unchanged. No significant interactions between driving pressure reduction and baseline driving pressure, partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide or PaO₂:FiO₂ ratio were identified in metaregression analysis. Bleeding and haemolysis were the commonest complications of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Venovenous ECCO₂R permitted significant reductions in ∆P in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS. Heterogeneity amongst studies and devices, a paucity of randomised controlled trials, and variable safety reporting calls for standardisation of outcome reporting. Prospective evaluation of optimal device operation and anticoagulation in high quality studies is required before further recommendations can be made.

Risks and Benefits of Ultra-Lung-Protective Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Strategies with a Focus on Extracorporeal Support

Lung-protective ventilation strategies are the current standard of care for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in an effort to provide adequate ventilatory requirements while minimizing ventilator-induced lung injury. Some patients may benefit from ultra-lung-protective ventilation, a strategy that achieves lower airway pressures and tidal volumes than the current standard. Specific physiological parameters beyond severity of hypoxemia, such as driving pressure and respiratory system elastance, may be predictive of those most likely to benefit. Since application of ultra-lung-protective ventilation is often limited by respiratory acidosis, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R), which remove carbon dioxide from blood, are attractive options. These strategies are associated with hematological complications, especially when applied at low blood flow rates with devices designed for higher blood flows, and a recent large randomized, controlled trial failed to show a benefit from an ECCO2R-facilitated ultra-lung-protective ventilation strategy. Only in patients with very severe forms of ARDS has the use of an ultra-lung-protective ventilation strategy - accomplished with ECMO - been suggested to have a favorable risk-to-benefit profile. In this Critical Care Perspective, we address key areas of controversy related to ultra-lung-protective ventilation, including the trade-offs between minimizing ventilator-induced lung injury and the risks from strategies to achieve this added protection. In addition, we suggest which patients might benefit most from an ultra-lung-protective strategy and propose areas of future research.

A Minimally Invasive and Highly Effective Extracorporeal CO2 Removal Device Combined With a Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

OBJECTIVES

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal is used to treat patients suffering from acute respiratory failure. However, the procedure is hampered by the high blood flow required to achieve a significant CO2 clearance. We aimed to develop an ultralow blood flow device to effectively remove CO2 combined with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).

DESIGN

Preclinical, proof-of-concept study.

SETTING

An extracorporeal circuit where 200 mL/min of blood flowed through a hemofilter connected to a closed-loop dialysate circuit. An ion-exchange resin acidified the dialysate upstream, a membrane lung to increase Pco2 and promote CO2 removal.

PATIENTS

Six, 38.7 ± 2.0-kg female pigs.

INTERVENTIONS

Different levels of acidification were tested (from 0 to 5 mEq/min). Two l/hr of postdilution CRRT were performed continuously. The respiratory rate was modified at each step to maintain arterial Pco2 at 50 mm Hg.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Increasing acidification enhanced CO2 removal efficiency of the membrane lung from 30 ± 5 (0 mEq/min) up to 145 ± 8 mL/min (5 mEq/min), with a 483% increase, representing the 73% ± 7% of the total body CO2 production. Minute ventilation decreased accordingly from 6.5 ± 0.7 to 1.7 ± 0.5 L/min. No major side effects occurred, except for transient tachycardia episodes. As expected from the alveolar gas equation, the natural lung Pao2 dropped at increasing acidification steps, given the high dissociation between the oxygenation and CO2 removal capability of the device, thus Pao2 decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

This new extracorporeal ion-exchange resin-based multiple-organ support device proved extremely high efficiency in CO2 removal and continuous renal support in a preclinical setting. Further studies are required before clinical implementation.

Targeting arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients using extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal

BACKGROUND

A retrospective analysis of SUPERNOVA trial data showed that reductions in tidal volume to ultraprotective levels without significant increases in arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO₂ ) for critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) depends on the rate of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂ R).

METHODS

We used a whole-body mathematical model of acid-base balance to quantify the effect of altering carbon dioxide (CO₂ ) removal rates using different ECCO₂ R devices to achieve target PaCO₂ levels in ARDS patients. Specifically, we predicted the effect of using a new, larger surface area PrismaLung+ device instead of the original PrismaLung device on the results from two multicenter clinical studies in critically ill, mechanically ventilated ARDS patients.

RESULTS

After calibrating model parameters to the clinical study data using the PrismaLung device, model predictions determined optimal extracorporeal blood flow rates for the PrismaLung+ and mechanical ventilation frequencies to obtain target PaCO₂ levels of 45 and 50 mm Hg in mild and moderate ARDS patients treated at a tidal volume of 3.98 ml/kg predicted body weight (PW). Comparable model predictions showed that reductions in tidal volumes below 6 ml/kg PBW may be difficult for acidotic highly severe ARDS patients with acute kidney injury and high CO₂ production rates using a PrismaLung+ device in-series with a continuous venovenous hemofiltration device.

CONCLUSIONS

The described model provides guidance on achieving target PaCO₂ levels in mechanically ventilated ARDS patients using protective and ultraprotective tidal volumes when increasing CO₂ removal rates from ECCO₂ R devices.

Alkaline Liquid Ventilation of the Membrane Lung for Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal (ECCO2R): In Vitro Study

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂R) is a promising strategy to manage acute respiratory failure. We hypothesized that ECCO₂R could be enhanced by ventilating the membrane lung with a sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution with high CO₂ absorbing capacity. A computed mathematical model was implemented to assess NaOH–CO₂ interactions. Subsequently, we compared NaOH infusion, named “alkaline liquid ventilation”, to conventional oxygen sweeping flows. We built an extracorporeal circuit with two polypropylene membrane lungs, one to remove CO₂ and the other to maintain a constant PCO₂ (60 ± 2 mmHg). The circuit was primed with swine blood. Blood flow was 500 mL × min⁻¹. After testing the safety and feasibility of increasing concentrations of aqueous NaOH (up to 100 mmol × L⁻¹), the CO₂ removal capacity of sweeping oxygen was compared to that of 100 mmol × L⁻¹ NaOH. We performed six experiments to randomly test four sweep flows (100, 250, 500, 1000 mL × min⁻¹) for each fluid plus 10 L × min⁻¹ oxygen. Alkaline liquid ventilation proved to be feasible and safe. No damages or hemolysis were detected. NaOH showed higher CO₂ removal capacity compared to oxygen for flows up to 1 L × min⁻¹. However, the highest CO₂ extraction power exerted by NaOH was comparable to that of 10 L × min⁻¹ oxygen. Further studies with dedicated devices are required to exploit potential clinical applications of alkaline liquid ventilation.

Modeling acid-base balance for in-series extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal and continuous venovenous hemofiltration devices

Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute kidney injury (AKI) treated by kidney replacement therapy may also require treatment with extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂ R) devices to permit protective or ultraprotective mechanical ventilation. We developed a mathematical model of acid-base balance during extracorporeal therapy using ECCO₂ R and continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) devices applied in series for the treatment of mechanically ventilated AKI patients. Published data from clinical studies of mechanically ventilated AKI patients treated by CVVH at known infusion rates of substitution fluid without ECCO₂ R were used to adjust the model parameters to fit plasma levels of arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO₂ ), arterial plasma bicarbonate concentration ([HCO₃ ]), and plasma pH (as well as certain other unmeasured physiological variables). The effects of applying ECCO₂ R at an unchanged and a reduced tidal volume on PaCO₂ , [HCO₃ ] and plasma pH were then simulated assuming carbon dioxide removal rates from the ECCO₂ R device measured in the clinical studies. Agreement of such model predictions with clinical data was good whether the ECCO₂ R device was positioned proximal or distal to the CVVH device in the extracorporeal circuit. Although carbon dioxide removal rates from the ECCO₂ R device measured in one previous clinical study were higher when it was placed proximal to the CVVH device, suggesting that such in-series positioning was optimal, the current mathematical model demonstrates that proximal positioning of the ECCO₂ R device also results in lower bicarbonate (and, therefore, total carbon dioxide) removal from the distal CVVH device. Thus, the removal of total carbon dioxide by such extracorporeal circuits is relatively independent of the position of the in-series devices. It is concluded that the described mathematical model has quantitative accuracy; these results suggest that the overall acid-base balance when using ECCO₂ R and CVVH devices in a single extracorporeal circuit will be similar, independent of their in-series position.

Continuous renal replacement therapy and extended indications

Extracorporeal blood purification (EBP) techniques provide support for critically ill patients with single or multiple organ dysfunction. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is the modality of choice for kidney support for those patients and orchestrates the interactions between the different artificial organ support systems. Intensive care teams should be familiar with the concept of sequential extracorporeal therapy and plan on how to incorporate new treatment modalities into their daily practices. Importantly, scientific evidence should guide the decision-making process at the bedside and provide robust arguments to justify the costs of implementing new EBP treatments. In this narrative review, we explore the extended indications for CRRT as an adjunctive treatment to provide support for the heart, lung, liver, and immune system. We detail practicalities on how to run the treatments and how to tackle the most frequent complications regarding each of the therapies, whether applied alone or integrated. The physicochemical processes and technologies involved at the molecular level encompassing the interactions between the molecules, membranes, and resins are spotlighted. A clinical case will illustrate the timing for the initiation, maintenance, and discontinuation of EBP techniques.

The use of extracorporeal CO2 removal in acute respiratory failure

Background

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation and protective mechanical ventilation of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients induce hypercapnic respiratory acidosis.

Main text

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂R) aims to eliminate blood CO₂ to fight against the adverse effects of hypercapnia and related acidosis. Hypercapnia has deleterious extrapulmonary consequences, particularly for the brain. In addition, in the lung, hypercapnia leads to: lower pH, pulmonary vasoconstriction, increases in right ventricular afterload, acute cor pulmonale. Moreover, hypercapnic acidosis may further damage the lungs by increasing both nitric oxide production and inflammation and altering alveolar epithelial cells. During an exacerbation of COPD, relieving the native lungs of at least a portion of the CO₂ could potentially reduce the patient's respiratory work, Instead of mechanically increasing alveolar ventilation with MV in an already hyperinflated lung to increase CO₂ removal, the use of ECCO₂R may allow a decrease in respiratory volume and respiratory rate, resulting in improvement of lung mechanic. Thus, the use of ECCO₂R may prevent noninvasive ventilation failure and allow intubated patients to be weaned off mechanical ventilation. In ARDS patients, ECCO₂R may be used to promote an ultraprotective ventilation in allowing to lower tidal volume, plateau (Pplat) and driving pressures, parameters that have identified as a major risk factors for mortality. However, although ECCO₂R appears to be effective in improving gas exchange and possibly in reducing the rate of endotracheal intubation and allowing more protective ventilation, its use may have pulmonary and hemodynamic consequences and may be associated with complications.

Conclusion

In selected patients, ECCO₂R may be a promising adjunctive therapeutic strategy for the management of patients with severe COPD exacerbation and for the establishment of protective or ultraprotective ventilation in patients with ARDS without prognosis-threatening hypoxemia.

Ultraprotective ventilation allowed by extracorporeal CO2 removal improves the right ventricular function in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: a quasi-experimental pilot study

Background

Right ventricular (RV) failure is a common complication in moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). RV failure is exacerbated by hypercapnic acidosis and overdistension induced by mechanical ventilation. Veno-venous extracorporeal CO₂ removal (ECCO₂R) might allow ultraprotective ventilation with lower tidal volume (V_T) and plateau pressure (P_plat). This study investigated whether ECCO₂R therapy could affect RV function.

Methods

This was a quasi-experimental prospective observational pilot study performed in a French medical ICU. Patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS with PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio between 80 and 150 mmHg were enrolled. An ultraprotective ventilation strategy was used with V_T at 4 mL/kg of predicted body weight during the 24 h following the start of a low-flow ECCO₂R device. RV function was assessed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) during the study protocol.

Results

The efficacy of ECCO₂R facilitated an ultraprotective strategy in all 18 patients included. We observed a significant improvement in RV systolic function parameters. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) increased significantly under ultraprotective ventilation compared to baseline (from 22.8 to 25.4 mm; p < 0.05). Systolic excursion velocity (S’ wave) also increased after the 1-day protocol (from 13.8 m/s to 15.1 m/s; p < 0.05). A significant improvement in the aortic velocity time integral (VTIAo) under ultraprotective ventilation settings was observed (p = 0.05). There were no significant differences in the values of systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (sPAP) and RV preload.

Conclusion

Low-flow ECCO₂R facilitates an ultraprotective ventilation strategy thatwould improve RV function in moderate-to-severe ARDS patients. Improvement in RV contractility appears to be mainly due to a decrease in intrathoracic pressure allowed by ultraprotective ventilation, rather than a reduction of PaCO₂.

Evaluation of a New Extracorporeal CO2 Removal Device in an Experimental Setting

Background: Ultra-protective lung ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome or early weaning and/or avoidance of mechanical ventilation in decompensated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease may be facilitated by the use of extracorporeal CO₂ removal (ECCO₂R). We tested the CO₂ removal performance of a new ECCO₂R (CO₂RESET) device in an experimental animal model. Methods: Three healthy pigs were mechanically ventilated and connected to the CO₂RESET device (surface area = 1.8 m², EUROSETS S.r.l., Medolla, Italy). Respiratory settings were adjusted to induce respiratory acidosis with the adjunct of an external source of pure CO₂ (target pre membrane lung venous PCO₂ (P_preCO₂): 80–120 mmHg). The amount of CO₂ removed (VCO₂, mL/min) by the membrane lung was assessed directly by the ECCO₂R device. Results: Before the initiation of ECCO₂R, the median P_preCO₂ was 102.50 (95.30–118.20) mmHg. Using fixed incremental steps of the sweep gas flow and maintaining a fixed blood flow of 600 mL/min, VCO₂ progressively increased from 0 mL/min (gas flow of 0 mL/min) to 170.00 (160.00–200.00) mL/min at a gas flow of 10 L/min. In particular, a high increase of VCO₂ was observed increasing the gas flow from 0 to 2 L/min, then, VCO₂ tended to progressively achieve a steady-state for higher gas flows. No animal or pump complications were observed. Conclusions: Medium-flow ECCO₂R devices with a blood flow of 600 mL/min and a high surface membrane lung (1.8 m²) provided a high VCO₂ using moderate sweep gas flows (i.e., >2 L/min) in an experimental swine models with healthy lungs.

Extracorporeal life support for adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome

Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) can support gas exchange in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). During ECLS, venous blood is drained from a central vein via a cannula, pumped through a semipermeable membrane that permits diffusion of oxygen and carbon dioxide, and returned via a cannula to a central vein. Two related forms of ECLS are used. Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), which uses high blood flow rates to both oxygenate the blood and remove carbon dioxide, may be considered in patients with severe ARDS whose oxygenation or ventilation cannot be maintained adequately with best practice conventional mechanical ventilation and adjunctive therapies, including prone positioning. Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂R) uses lower blood flow rates through smaller cannulae and provides substantial CO₂ elimination (~ 20–70% of total CO₂ production), albeit with marginal improvement in oxygenation. The rationale for using ECCO₂R in ARDS is to facilitate lung-protective ventilation by allowing a reduction of tidal volume, respiratory rate, plateau pressure, driving pressure and mechanical power delivered by the mechanical ventilator. This narrative review summarizes physiological concepts related to ECLS, as well as the rationale and evidence supporting ECMO and ECCO₂R for the treatment of ARDS. It also reviews complications, limitations, and the ethical dilemmas that can arise in treating patients with ECLS. Finally, it discusses future key research questions and challenges for this technology.

Management of hypercapnia in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients-A narrative review of literature

The use of lower tidal volume ventilation was shown to improve survival in mechanically ventilated patients with acute lung injury. In some patients this strategy may cause hypercapnic acidosis. A significant body of recent clinical data suggest that hypercapnic acidosis is associated with adverse clinical outcomes including increased hospital mortality. We aimed to review the available treatment options that may be used to manage acute hypercapnic acidosis that may be seen with low tidal volume ventilation. The databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched. Studies including animals or tissues were excluded. We also searched bibliographic references of relevant studies, irrespective of study design with the intention of finding relevant studies to be included in this review. The possible options to treat hypercapnia included optimising the use of low tidal volume mechanical ventilation to enhance carbon dioxide elimination. These include techniques to reduce dead space ventilation, and physiological dead space, use of buffers, airway pressure release ventilation and prone positon ventilation. In patients where hypercapnic acidosis could not be managed with lung protective mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal techniques may be used. Newer, minimally invasive low volume venovenous extracorporeal devices are currently being investigated for managing hypercapnia associated with low and ultra-low volume mechanical ventilation.

Physiological effects of adding ECCO2R to invasive mechanical ventilation for COPD exacerbations

Background

Extracorporeal CO₂ removal (ECCO₂R) could be a valuable additional modality for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in COPD patients suffering from severe acute exacerbation (AE). We aimed to evaluate in such patients the effects of a low-to-middle extracorporeal blood flow device on both gas exchanges and dynamic hyperinflation, as well as on work of breathing (WOB) during the IMV weaning process.

Study design and methods

Open prospective interventional study in 12 deeply sedated IMV AE-COPD patients studied before and after ECCO₂R initiation. Gas exchange and dynamic hyperinflation were compared after stabilization without and with ECCO₂R (Hemolung, Alung, Pittsburgh, USA) combined with a specific adjustment algorithm of the respiratory rate (RR) designed to improve arterial pH. When possible, WOB with and without ECCO₂R was measured at the end of the weaning process. Due to study size, results are expressed as median (IQR) and a non-parametric approach was adopted.

Results

An improvement in PaCO₂, from 68 (63; 76) to 49 (46; 55) mmHg, p = 0.0005, and in pH, from 7.25 (7.23; 7.29) to 7.35 (7.32; 7.40), p = 0.0005, was observed after ECCO₂R initiation and adjustment of respiratory rate, while intrinsic PEEP and Functional Residual Capacity remained unchanged, from 9.0 (7.0; 10.0) to 8.0 (5.0; 9.0) cmH₂O and from 3604 (2631; 4850) to 3338 (2633; 4848) mL, p = 0.1191 and p = 0.3013, respectively. WOB measurements were possible in 5 patients, indicating near-significant higher values after stopping ECCO₂R: 11.7 (7.5; 15.0) versus 22.6 (13.9; 34.7) Joules/min., p = 0.0625 and 1.1 (0.8; 1.4) versus 1.5 (0.9; 2.8) Joules/L, p = 0.0625. Three patients died in-ICU. Other patients were successfully hospital-discharged.

Conclusions

Using a formalized protocol of RR adjustment, ECCO₂R permitted to effectively improve pH and diminish PaCO₂ at the early phase of IMV in 12 AE-COPD patients, but not to diminish dynamic hyperinflation in the whole group. A trend toward a decrease in WOB was also observed during the weaning process.

Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: Identifier: NCT02586948.

ECCO2R therapy in the ICU: consensus of a European round table meeting

Background

With recent advances in technology, patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and severe acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ae-COPD) could benefit from extracorporeal CO₂ removal (ECCO₂R). However, current evidence in these indications is limited. A European ECCO₂R Expert Round Table Meeting was convened to further explore the potential for this treatment approach.

Methods

A modified Delphi-based method was used to collate European experts’ views to better understand how ECCO₂R therapy is applied, identify how patients are selected and how treatment decisions are made, as well as to identify any points of consensus.

Results

Fourteen participants were selected based on known clinical expertise in critical care and in providing respiratory support with ECCO₂R or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ARDS was considered the primary indication for ECCO₂R therapy (n = 7), while 3 participants considered ae-COPD the primary indication. The group agreed that the primary treatment goal of ECCO₂R therapy in patients with ARDS was to apply ultra-protective lung ventilation via managing CO₂ levels. Driving pressure (≥ 14 cmH₂O) followed by plateau pressure (P_plat; ≥ 25 cmH₂O) was considered the most important criteria for ECCO₂R initiation. Key treatment targets for patients with ARDS undergoing ECCO₂R included pH (> 7.30), respiratory rate (< 25 or < 20 breaths/min), driving pressure (< 14 cmH₂O) and P_plat (< 25 cmH₂O). In ae-COPD, there was consensus that, in patients at risk of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) failure, no decrease in PaCO₂ and no decrease in respiratory rate were key criteria for initiating ECCO₂R therapy. Key treatment targets in ae-COPD were patient comfort, pH (> 7.30–7.35), respiratory rate (< 20–25 breaths/min), decrease of PaCO₂ (by 10–20%), weaning from NIV, decrease in HCO₃⁻ and maintaining haemodynamic stability. Consensus was reached on weaning protocols for both indications. Anticoagulation with intravenous unfractionated heparin was the strategy preferred by the group.

Conclusions

Insights from this group of experienced physicians suggest that ECCO₂R therapy may be an effective supportive treatment for adults with ARDS or ae-COPD. Further evidence from randomised clinical trials and/or high-quality prospective studies is needed to better guide decision making.

Update on extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal: a comprehensive review on principles, indications, efficiency, and complications

TECHNOLOGY

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal means the removal of carbon dioxide from the blood across a gas exchange membrane without substantially improving oxygenation. Carbon dioxide removal is possible with substantially less extracorporeal blood flow than needed for oxygenation. Techniques for extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal include (1) pumpless arterio-venous circuits, (2) low-flow venovenous circuits based on the technology of continuous renal replacement therapy, and (3) venovenous circuits based on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation technology.

INDICATIONS

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal has been shown to enable more protective ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients, even beyond the so-called "protective" level. Although experimental data suggest a benefit on ventilator induced lung injury, no hard clinical evidence with respect to improved outcome exists. In addition, extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal is a tool to avoid intubation and mechanical ventilation in patients with acute exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease failing non-invasive ventilation. This concept has been shown to be effective in 56-90% of patients. Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal has also been used in ventilated patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure to correct acidosis, unload respiratory muscle burden, and facilitate weaning. In patients suffering from terminal fibrosis awaiting lung transplantation, extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal is able to correct acidosis and enable spontaneous breathing during bridging. Keeping these patients awake, ambulatory, and breathing spontaneously is associated with favorable outcome.

COMPLICATIONS

Complications of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal are mostly associated with vascular access and deranged hemostasis leading to bleeding. Although the spectrum of complications may differ, no technology offers advantages with respect to rate and severity of complications. So called "high-extraction systems" working with higher blood flows and larger membranes may be more effective with respect to clinical goals.

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal requirements for ultraprotective mechanical ventilation: Mathematical model predictions

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide (CO₂) removal (ECCO₂R) facilitates the use of low tidal volumes during protective or ultraprotective mechanical ventilation when managing patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); however, the rate of ECCO₂R required to avoid hypercapnia remains unclear. We calculated ECCO₂R rate requirements to maintain arterial partial pressure of CO₂ (PaCO₂) at clinically desirable levels in mechanically ventilated ARDS patients using a six‐compartment mathematical model of CO₂ and oxygen (O₂) biochemistry and whole‐body transport with the inclusion of an ECCO₂R device for extracorporeal veno‐venous removal of CO₂. The model assumes steady state conditions. Model compartments were lung capillary blood, arterial blood, venous blood, post‐ECCO₂R venous blood, interstitial fluid and tissue cells, with CO₂ and O₂ distribution within each compartment; biochemistry included equilibrium among bicarbonate and non‐bicarbonate buffers and CO₂ and O₂ binding to hemoglobin to elucidate Bohr and Haldane effects. O₂ consumption and CO₂ production rates were assumed proportional to predicted body weight (PBW) and adjusted to achieve reported arterial partial pressure of O₂ and a PaCO₂ level of 46 mmHg at a tidal volume of 7.6 mL/kg PBW in the absence of an ECCO₂R device based on average data from LUNG SAFE. Model calculations showed that ECCO₂R rates required to achieve mild permissive hypercapnia (PaCO₂ of 46 mmHg) at a ventilation frequency or respiratory rate of 20.8/min during mechanical ventilation increased when tidal volumes decreased from 7.6 to 3 mL/kg PBW. Higher ECCO2R rates were required to achieve normocapnia (PaCO2 of 40 mmHg). Model calculations also showed that required ECCO2R rates were lower when ventilation frequencies were increased from 20.8/min to 26/min. The current mathematical model predicts that ECCO2R rates resulting in clinically desirable PaCO2 levels at tidal volumes of 5‐6 mL/kg PBW can likely be achieved in mechanically ventilated ARDS patients with current technologies; use of ultraprotective tidal volumes (3‐4 mL/kg PBW) may be challenging unless high mechanical ventilation frequencies are used.