Exhaled nitric oxide in the diagnosis of asthma: comparison with bronchial provocation tests

Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide Testing for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma: a Health Technology Assessment

Background

Asthma is a common respiratory disease characterized by airflow obstruction caused by inflammation and narrowing of the airways. Nitric oxide is a gas that is present at low levels in the lungs, but that is elevated in the presence of airway inflammation. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) testing may help in the diagnosis and management of asthma by measuring the amount of nitric oxide in the breath. We conducted a health technology assessment of FeNO testing for the diagnosis and management of asthma in children and adults, which included an evaluation of the accuracy, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, the budget impact of publicly funding FeNO testing, and patient preferences and values.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature search of the clinical evidence. We assessed the risk of bias of each included study using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool, version 2 (QUADAS-2) and of each systematic review using the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Systematic Reviews (ROBIS). We evaluated the quality of the body of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria. We performed a systematic economic literature search and conducted cost-utility analyses with a 20-year time horizon from a public payer perspective. We also analyzed the budget impact of publicly funding FeNO testing in children and adults in Ontario. To contextualize the potential value of FeNO testing, we spoke with people with asthma and their care partners.

Results

We included 48 primary studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of FeNO testing and 2 reviews evaluating the effectiveness of FeNO testing for asthma management in the clinical evidence review. The use of FeNO testing for the diagnosis of asthma reported variable (~30% to 90%) sensitivities (GRADE: Very low) and consistently high (~70% to 100%) specificities (GRADE: Low) in children and adults. FeNO testing for asthma management likely reduced exacerbations in children (GRADE: Moderate) and adults (GRADE: Moderate), lowered oral corticosteroid use in children (GRADE: Moderate), and slightly improved lung function in a mixed population (GRADE: Moderate), but little to no improvement was seen in other outcomes. We found that, for asthma diagnosis, FeNO testing in addition to standard testing is cost-effective in children, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $6,192 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. FeNO testing is not cost-effective for asthma diagnosis in adults except when a higher FeNO cut-off is applied. For asthma management, the ICER of FeNO testing compared with standard care alone is $103,893 per QALY gained in children and $200,135 per QALY gained in adults. Publicly funding FeNO testing as an adjunct to standard testing for asthma diagnosis over the next 5 years would cost about $0.10 million to $0.22 million for children and $1.19 million to $1.61 million for adults over the next 5 years, and for asthma management would cost about $22.37 million for children and $195.99 million for adults over the next 5 years. Participants were unaware if they had experience with FeNO testing because of its similarity to other types of asthma testing, but they reported valuing the potential of FeNO testing to provide more information about their condition as well as aid in the diagnosis and management. Barriers to access include lack of awareness and the limited availability of FeNO testing across the province.

Conclusions

We found that FeNO testing had good diagnostic specificity (i.e., low false positive rate), supporting its use as an adjunct to standard testing to help rule-in an asthma diagnosis in both children and adults. FeNO testing to monitor and manage asthma likely resulted in a reduction in the number of people who experienced exacerbations and used oral corticosteroids, but may make little to no difference in improving other health outcomes. FeNO testing is likely cost-effective as an additional test to support the diagnosis of asthma in children, as well as in adults when a higher FeNO cut-off is applied, but is likely not cost-effective as an additional test to monitor and manage asthma in both children and adults. We estimate that publicly funding FeNO testing as an adjunct to standard testing for asthma diagnosis in Ontario would result in additional costs of $0.10 million to $0.22 million for children and $1.19 million to $1.61 million for adults over the next 5 years. For monitoring and managing asthma, FeNO testing would result in additional costs of $22.37 million for children and $195.99 million for adults over the next 5 years. People we spoke with were unaware if they had experience with FeNO testing because of its similarity to other types of asthma testing, but they reported valuing the potential of FeNO testing to provide more information about their condition as well as aid in the diagnosis and management of asthma.

[History of atopy reduces predictive value of fractional exhaled nitric oxide for eosinophilic airway inflammation in chronic cough]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of a history of atopy on the value of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) for predicting sputum eosinophils in patients with chronic cough.

METHODS

A total of 868 patients with persistent cough lasting more than 3 weeks without pulmonary infection were enrolled, including 119 patients with subacute cough (defined as cough lasting 3-8 weeks) and 749 with chronic cough (longer than 8 weeks). The predictive value of FENO level for sputum eosinophilia was analyzed using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. The atopy status of the patients was determined by screening for history of allergy, hay fever, or animal or food allergies.

RESULTS

Of the 868 patients enrolled, 173 patients (19.9%) had eosinophilic airway inflammation (EAI). In the overall patients, the median (Q1, Q3) FENO level was 18 (12, 35) ppb, ranging from 5 to 300 ppb. The patients with chronic cough and a positive history of atopy had a higher median FENO level than those without atopy (24 [13, 50] vs 18 [11, 34]; Z=2.25, P= 0.029), and FENO level was significantly correlated with EAI (r=0.281, P < 0.001). The AUCs of FENO for diagnosis of airway eosinophilia in patients with atopy and those without atopy were 0.677 (95% CI: 0.548-0.806) and 0.708 (95% CI: 0.660-0.756), respectively. The optimal cut-off value of FENO for diagnosing EAI was higher in patients with atopy than in those without atopy (72 vs 28.5 ppb).

CONCLUSION

A history of atopy reduces the predictive value of FENO level for EAI in patients with chronic cough, suggesting the importance of examining the atopic status when interpreting test results of FENO.

European Respiratory Society Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Asthma in Adults

Although asthma is very common affecting 5-10% of the population, the diagnosis of asthma in adults remains a challenge in the real world that results in both over- and under-diagnosis. A task force (TF) was set up by the European Respiratory Society to systematically review the literature on the diagnostic accuracy of tests used to diagnose asthma in adult patients and provide recommendation for clinical practice.The TF defined eight PICO (Population, Index, Comparator, and Outcome) questions that were assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach, The TF utilised the outcomes to develop an evidenced-based diagnostic algorithm, with recommendations for a pragmatic guideline for everyday practice that was directed by real-life patient experiences.The TF support the initial use of spirometry followed, and if airway obstruction is present, by bronchodilator reversibility testing. If initial spirometry fails to show obstruction, further tests should be performed in the following order: FeNO, PEF variability or in secondary care, bronchial challenge. We present the thresholds for each test that are compatible with a diagnosis of asthma in the presence of current symptoms.The TF reinforce the priority to undertake spirometry and recognise the value of measuring blood eosinophils and serum IgE to phenotype the patient. Measuring gas trapping by body plethysmography in patients with preserved FEV1/FVC ratio deserves further attention. The TF draw attention on the difficulty of making a correct diagnosis in patients already receiving inhaled corticosteroids, the comorbidities that may obscure the diagnosis, the importance of phenotyping, and the necessity to consider the patient experience in the diagnostic process.

Exploring the 175-year history of spirometry and the vital lessons it can teach us today

175 years have elapsed since John Hutchinson introduced the world to his version of an apparatus that had been in development for nearly two centuries, the spirometer. Though he was not the first to build a device that sought to measure breathing and quantify the impact of disease and occupation on lung function, Hutchison coined the terms spirometer and vital capacity that are still in use today, securing his place in medical history. As Hutchinson envisioned, spirometry would become crucial to our growing knowledge of respiratory pathophysiology, from Tiffeneau and Pinelli's work on forced expiratory volumes, to Fry and Hyatt's description of the flow-volume curve. In the 20th century, standardization of spirometry further broadened its reach and prognostic potential. Today, spirometry is recognized as essential to respiratory disease diagnosis, management and research. However, controversy exists in some of its applications, uptake in primary care remains sub-optimal and there are concerns related to the way in which race is factored into interpretation. Moving forward, these failings must be addressed, and innovations like Internet-enabled portable spirometers may present novel opportunities. We must also consider the physiologic and practical limitations inherent to spirometry and further investigate complementary technologies such as respiratory oscillometry and other emerging technologies that assess lung function. Through an exploration of the storied history of spirometry, we can better contextualize its current landscape and appreciate the trends that have repeatedly arisen over time. This may help to improve our current use of spirometry and may allow us to anticipate the obstacles confronting emerging pulmonary function technologies.

Economic Evaluation of the Use of FeNO for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma Patients in Primary Care in Sweden

OBJECTIVE

To determine the economic impact of the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in asthma diagnosis and management in primary care in Sweden.

METHODS

An economic model has been developed to determine the economic impact of the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in asthma diagnosis and management in primary care in Sweden. The model includes the use and cost of commonly used tests, the associated outcomes and diagnostic accuracy. We compared FeNO with spirometry and reversibility testing, methacholine challenge test, allergy testing, and blood eosinophil count. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed to confirm the robustness of results.

RESULTS

Adding FeNO measurement in asthma diagnosis resulted in cost savings of SEK 672 per patient by the fourth year. The use of FeNO testing in asthma management proved to be a dominant strategy when compared with each other test except methacholine challenge test. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results.

CONCLUSION

Introducing FeNO testing in clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of asthma in primary care in Sweden is less costly than standard methods while providing similar health benefits.

Predictive Markers of Bronchial Hyperreactivity in a Large Cohort of Young Adults With Cough Variant Asthma

Cough variant asthma (CVA), a common asthma phenotype characterized by nonproductive cough and bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR), is usually detected by bronchial provocation tests (BPTs) which are time-consuming, expensive, and unsafe. The primary study objective was to provide proof of concept for the use of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (F_ENO), eosinophil count percentage in induced sputum (sEOS%), forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75% of forced vital capacity (FEF_25–75%) % predicted value, and FEF_25–75% z-scores as surrogate markers predicting BHR in young adults with suspected CVA; the secondary objective was to compare the diagnostic performance of the various techniques. Three hundred and ten subjects (median age 24 years) were included in a cross-sectional study. Subjects were characterized as BHR positive (POS) (n = 147) or BHR negative (NEG) (n = 163) according to methacholine BPT. Classification accuracies were expressed as areas under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUC). Compared with BHR NEG, FEF_25–75% % predicted value and FEF_25–75% z-scores were lower in the BHR POS group (p < 0.001), whereas F_ENO (p < 0.001) and sEOS% were higher (p < 0.001). AUC values for detecting BHR were as follows: F_ENO, 0.98 (SD = 0.02); sEOS%, 0.98 (SD = 0.02); FEF_25–75% % pred, 0.93 (SD = 0.05); FEF_25–75% z scores, 0.92 (SD = 0.05). Optimal cutoff values (OCV) for BHR prediction were as follows: F_ENO, 32.7 ppb (sensitivity = 0.93, specificity = 0.96), sEOS%, 3.80% (sensitivity = 0.94, specificity = 0.94), FEF_25–75% % predicted value, 80.0% (sensitivity = 0.90, specificity = 0.87), and FEF_25–75% z-score, −0.87 (sensitivity = 0.89, specificity = 0.87). Non-invasive/semi-invasive airway inflammatory or small airway functional measures might be used as surrogate markers predicting BHR in young adults with suspected CVA.

Addressing Reduced Laboratory-Based Pulmonary Function Testing During a Pandemic

To reduce the spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, many pulmonary function testing (PFT) laboratories have been closed or have significantly reduced their testing capacity. Because these mitigation strategies may be necessary for the next 6 to 18 months to prevent recurrent peaks in disease prevalence, fewer objective measurements of lung function will alter the diagnosis and care of patients with chronic respiratory diseases. PFT, which includes spirometry, lung volume, and diffusion capacity measurement, is essential to the diagnosis and management of patients with asthma, COPD, and other chronic lung conditions. Both traditional and innovative alternatives to conventional testing must now be explored. These may include peak expiratory flow devices, electronic portable spirometers, portable exhaled nitric oxide measurement, airwave oscillometry devices, and novel digital health tools such as smartphone microphone spirometers and mobile health technologies along with integration of machine learning approaches. The adoption of some novel approaches may not merely replace but could improve existing management strategies and alter common diagnostic paradigms. With these options comes important technical, privacy, ethical, financial, and medicolegal barriers that must be addressed. However, the coronavirus disease 19 pandemic also presents a unique opportunity to augment conventional testing by including innovative and emerging approaches to measuring lung function remotely in patients with respiratory disease. The benefits of such an approach have the potential to enhance respiratory care and empower patient self-management well beyond the current global pandemic.

DNA methylation down-regulates integrin β4 expression in asthmatic airway epithelial cells

BACKGROUND

Integrin β4 (ITGB4) is a hemi-desmosome protein which is downregulated in the airway epithelial cells of asthma patients. The proximal promoters and exons of ITGB4 contain CpG islands or multiple CpG sites both in human and mice, which indicated the possible methylation regulation of ITGB4 in airway epithelial cells.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to unveil that DNA methylation regulates the decreased ITGB4 during the pathogenesis of asthma.

METHODS

Mice were exposed to house dust mite (HDM) extracts to construct an asthma model. 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-AZA) or dexamethasone (DEX) were added in the last two weeks. Besides, the primary human bronchial epithelial (HBE) cells were incubated for the detection of ITGB4 expression and methylation status after HDM stress. Furthermore, DNA methylation of ITGB4 in peripheral blood was measured in asthma patients. Logistic regression was employed to evaluate the association between methylation sites and asthma patients' ages in the control of potential confounders. Moreover, the correlations between differentially methylated sites (DMSs) and clinical parameters in asthma patients were assessed. Finally, the ability of candidate DMSs to predict asthma was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and principal component analysis (PCA).

RESULTS

We found that in HDM-stressed asthma model, DNA methylation regulated the reduced ITGB4 expression in airway epithelial cells. Moreover, alteration in the specific CpG sites (chr17:73717720 and chr17:73717636) of ITGB4 may regulate ITGB4 expression and further may be associated with the clinically phenotypic of asthma. The specific DMSs of ITGB4 in peripheral blood can distinguish asthma patients from healthy controls (HCs) effectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study confirmed that DNA methylation regulates the decreased expression of ITGB4 in the airway epithelial cells of asthma patients. These results supply some useful insights to the mechanism of the decreased ITGB4 in asthmatic airway epithelial and provide possible targets for early prediction and screening of asthma.

Asthma and Lung Mechanics

This article will discuss in detail the pathophysiology of asthma from the point of view of lung mechanics. In particular, we will explain how asthma is more than just airflow limitation resulting from airway narrowing but in fact involves multiple consequences of airway narrowing, including ventilation heterogeneity, airway closure, and airway hyperresponsiveness. In addition, the relationship between the airway and surrounding lung parenchyma is thought to be critically important in asthma, especially as related to the response to deep inspiration. Furthermore, dynamic changes in lung mechanics over time may yield important information about asthma stability, as well as potentially provide a window into future disease control. All of these features of mechanical properties of the lung in asthma will be explained by providing evidence from multiple investigative methods, including not only traditional pulmonary function testing but also more sophisticated techniques such as forced oscillation, multiple breath nitrogen washout, and different imaging modalities. Throughout the article, we will link the lung mechanical features of asthma to clinical manifestations of asthma symptoms, severity, and control. © 2020 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 10:975-1007, 2020.

Nasal nitric oxide as a long-term monitoring and prognostic biomarker of mucosal health in chronic rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND

Nasal nitric oxide (nNO) is a potential biomarker of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), and correlates well with endoscopic and radiologic severity of disease. However, the long-term profile of nNO as a biomarker is not established in the literature. The objectives of our study were to examine whether nNO can maintain this correlation in a 5-year follow-up after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and to investigate whether nNO value can be used to prognosticate revision rates in patients with CRS.

METHODS

We enrolled CRS patients 5 years after initial ESS at our institution. Patients underwent initial ESS at our institution between January 2013 and January 2015. Patients prospectively had the following measurements at baseline, 1 month, 6 months, and 5 years post-ESS: nNO levels, Lund-Kennedy Endoscopy Score (LKES), and 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) score. We also compared the nNO levels between patients who underwent revision ESS and those who did not.

RESULTS

There were 32 patients included in the study with 8 patients undergoing revision ESS during the 5-year follow-up. nNO levels were elevated at 1 month, 6 months, and 5 years post-ESS compared to baseline. A significant negative correlation between nNO and LKES was found at 5 years post-ESS. nNO levels were significantly reduced at baseline and 6 months post-ESS in the revision cohort compared to the nonrevision cohort despite having comparable radiologic severity.

CONCLUSION

nNO may serve as a noninvasive long-term biomarker to monitor sinus disease severity and to prognosticate results in patients with CRS. This has implications for potential integration into clinical practice.

Asthma and rhinitis in Greek furniture workers

Objective: The detection of asthma and rhinitis in furniture workers exposed to chemicals in the area of Thessaloniki Greece and the determination of the most useful tests for diagnosing the above occupational diseases.Methods: Eighty-three workers (76 men), 35 exposed to chemicals (CW), 23 to wood dust (WW), and 25 office workers (OW), serving as controls, filled in a specialized European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS) questionnaire for asthma and were submitted to clinical evaluation, spirometry, bronchodilation test, PEF computer algorithm OASYS-2, FeNO, skin prick tests (SPTs), rhinomanometry and methacholine inhalation challenge. Working conditions and protective measurements were also recorded. According to the results of all conducted tests, each subject was distributed to a subgroup: (a) normal, (b) asthma, (c) rhinitis, (d) asthma and rhinitis. Comparisons were performed among work groups.Results: The presence of asthma and/or rhinitis was higher among CW and WW compared to OW (p = 0.004). Significant differences among groups were observed in the questions «better weekend» (p < 0.034) and "improvement on vacation» (p < 0.000), in OASYS-2 Score (p < 0.000), in ABC Score (p < 0.000), and in methacholine score (p < 0.022). Rhinomanometry, FeNO, spirometry, and spirometry after bronchodilation had no significant differences among groups. Working conditions, ventilation system, work practice, use and type of mask revealed no significant differences.Conclusion: Asthma and rhinitis are significantly common among CW. Protective measurements used were not adequate to prevent asthma and or work related rhinitis. Early diagnosis might contribute to disease prevention and control.

Clinical Utility Of The Exhaled Nitric Oxide (NO) Measurement With Portable Devices In The Management Of Allergic Airway Inflammation And Asthma

Nitric oxide (NO) is a potential bioactive gas produced continuously and constantly in the airways of healthy subjects. In allergic airway inflammation, the level of exhaled NO is usually increased and mediated by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) enzyme presenting in the epithelium and different inflammatory cells. The measurement of NO concentration in the airway is possible with portable devices which use an electroluminescence technique. In subjects with upper airway with allergic inflammation such as in allergic rhinitis, the measurement of nasal NO (nNO) may help to diagnose and manage the disease. In the lower airway, increased fractional exhaled NO (FENO) reflects directly the inflammatory process that occurs in the airways that are typically seen in asthma. It has been shown that there is a strong correlation between FENO levels and increased activity of airway inflammation mediated by immuno-allergic cells and mediators. Thus, FENO has higher specificity and sensitivity than other methods in diagnosing the severity of inflammation in asthmatic patients. Moreover, the correlation between increased FENO levels and a high risk of bronchial hyperresponsiveness has also been demonstrated. FENO is also a relevant biomarker to evaluate asthma status due to the change of its values occurring earlier than clinical manifestations and spirometry parameters. In addition, the measurement of FENO with portable devices helps to support the diagnosis of asthma, to follow-up the control of asthma and to personalize asthmatic patients for target treatment with biologic therapy. Therefore, measuring FENO with portable devices in the diagnosis and treatment of allergic airway inflammation, especially in asthma, is one of the most essential applications of NO biomarkers in exhaled breath.

Exhaled nitric oxide predicts loss of asthma control in children after inhaled corticosteroids withdrawal

BACKGROUND

Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) has been proposed for monitoring airway inflammation, diagnosis, and prediction of steroid responsiveness in asthma. However, its utility after elective suspension of asthma medication is still unclear. We aimed to determine the association between eNO values and the subsequent loss of asthma control (LAC) in asymptomatic asthmatic children after inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) withdrawal.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational cohort study. Forty-two children (23 boys), mean age 11 years, with clinically controlled asthma, according to GINA guidelines, and receiving low-dose of ICS (budesonide 200 μg/day or equivalent) were included immediately after the withdrawal of ICS. eNO, Asthma Control Test (ACT) and spirometry were monthly assessed, during 54 weeks or until the presence of at least one of the following criteria of LAC: 1) asthma exacerbation, 2) obstructive spirometric pattern, 3) ACT ≤ 19.

RESULTS

eNO baseline geometric mean (eNO_b ), measured 4 weeks after discontinuation of ICS, was 23.7 ppb (SD: 1.16). An eNO_b cutoff point of 21.8 ppb was determined to better discriminate between high and low eNO groups. Twenty-five subjects (71.4%) had LAC. High eNO_b was associated to LAC (OR: 9.01; 95CI: 1.10-74.26). In addition, LAC occurred earlier in high eNO_b than in low eNO_b patients (8 vs 28 weeks, respectively; P = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that eNO predicts loss of asthma control and may contribute for clinical follow up decisions during childhood asthma after ICS withdrawal.

Exhaled nitric oxide in chronic cough: A good tool in a multi-step approach

INTRODUCTION

The impact of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) on the management of chronic cough (CC) is still inconclusive. The aim of the present study was to assess whether FENO is a good tool to predict the response to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in patients with CC.

METHODS

Patients, referred for investigation of CC, had a FENO measurement determined as part of their first-line assessment. A methacholine test was performed as part of a second-line assessement. Patients were assigned to two groups according to their FENO values: a high FENO level group (Ⱕ25 ppb) and a normal FENO level group (<25 ppb).

RESULTS

One hundred patients were included in the study. High FENO levels were found in 25 patients (25%). The proportion of patients who responded to ICS was significantly greater in the high FENO group compared to the normal FENO level group (86.4% vs 46.3%, P<0.05). FENO is a good tool to predict ICS response in patients with high FENO levels but a response to ICS cannot be ruled out in patients with normal FENO levels. In patients with normal FENO values, a methacholine test could be an interesting tool for a second-line assessment. Among the 13 patients with a positive methacholine test result, 11 responded to ICS whilst 2 did not. Of the patients with a negative methacholine test result, 3 responded to ICS whilst 13 did not.

CONCLUSION

FENO may be a more reliable predictor of ICS response when used as part of a multi-step assessment procedure.

Accuracy of objective tests for diagnosing adult asthma in symptomatic patients: A systematic literature review and hierarchical Bayesian latent-class meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We obtain summary estimates of the accuracy of additional objective tests for the diagnosis of adult asthma using systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and other relevant electronic databases were searched for papers published between January 1989 and December 2016. Studies were included if they evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of objective tests, including airway reversibility (AR), airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), and fractionated exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) for the diagnosis of adult asthma in patients with symptoms suggestive of asthma. If papers were assessed appropriate using the adapted QUADAS-2 tool, meta-analysis was conducted using the hierarchical bivariate model. This hierarchical model accounts for both within and between study variability.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies reported the performance of the evaluated objective tests at presentation. For diagnosis of adult asthma, overall sensitivity and specificity for AR were 0.39 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18 to 0.66) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.00); for AHR, 0.86 (95% CI 0.61 to 1.00) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.00); for FeNO, 0.65 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.77) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.90). Comprehensive comparison of three diagnostic tools for adult asthma using the back-calculated likelihood rate (LR) showed that AR and AHR corresponded to a higher LR+, and AHR gave a lower LR-.

CONCLUSIONS

In the current situation of no gold standard for diagnosis of adult asthma, AR and AHR are appropriate for ruling-in the true diagnosis, and AHR is superior for ruling-out a diagnosis. Since each objective test had a specific characteristic, it should be chosen depending on the situation, such as the capacity of the institution and the conditions of patients.

Exhaled NO as a predictor of exercise-induced asthma in cold air

PURPOSE

Physical activity is an important part of life, and exercise-induced asthma (EIA) can reduce the quality of life. A standardized exercise challenge is needed to diagnose EIA, but this is a time consuming, effortful and expensive method. Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) as a marker of eosinophil inflammation is determined rapidly and easily. The aim of this study was to investigate eNO as surrogate marker for predicting a positive reaction in an exercise challenge in a cold chamber (ECC).

METHODS

A total of 143 subjects aged 6-45 years with suspected EIA were recruited for the study. The subjects underwent an eNO measurement, an ECC and a skin prick test (SPT). To define the sensitivity and specificity of eNO as predictor, a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted. The individual probability of the occurrence of a positive reaction after ECC based on an eNO value was calculated using a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

An eNO cut-off value of 18.5 ppb (area under the curve (AUC) 0.71, p < 0.001) showed the best combination of sensitivity and specificity for a positive reaction (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) decrease ≥ 10% after ECC) for the whole group. An eNO cut-off value of 46.0 ppb had a specificity of 100.0% to predict a significant FEV₁ decrease and may save exercise testing in 22.4% of patients. A negative predictive level with a high sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) could not be defined. In the subgroup that was house dust might (HDM) allergy positive (HDM pos; n = 68, 45.5% of all subjects), an eNO cut-off value of 35.5 ppb (AUC 0.79, p < 0.01) showed the best combination of sensitivity and specificity for a positive reaction after the ECC with a specificity 100.0% and may save exercise testing in 45.6% of HDM pos patients. Using logistic regression, a 95% probability for a positive FEV₁ decrease after ECC was estimated at 53 ppb for the whole group and at 47 ppb for the HDM pos subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

Exhaled NO measurement is a screening tool for EIA, especially in HDM pos subjects. In a real-life setting, a cut-off value of 46.0 ppb detects EIA at 100% in all suspected patients, and a cut-off level of 35.5 ppb is valuable marker of EIA in patients with an HDM allergy. These levels can save time and costs in a large proportion of patients and will be helpful for clinicians.

The Value of Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Forced Mid-Expiratory Flow as Predictive Markers of Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness in Adults with Chronic Cough

BACKGROUND

Bronchial provocation tests are standard for diagnosing the etiology of chronic cough, but they are time consuming and can induce severe bronchospasm. A safer and faster clinical examination to predict bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) is needed.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate whether small-airway function tests can predict BHR in adult patients with chronic cough.

METHODS

A retrospective, cross-sectional study of diagnoses made using spirometry and bronchial provocation test results was performed in 290 patients with chronic nonproductive cough. BHR-predictive values were analyzed via the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs). Optimal cutoff values were determined by maximizing the sum of sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

Patients with chronic cough with BHR showed lower forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% (FEF_25%-75%), higher fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO), and a higher percentage of eosinophils in blood than patients without BHR (P < .0001 for all). The AUCs of FENO and FEF_25%-75% for a BHR diagnosis were 0.788 (95% CI, 0.725-0.851) and 0.702 (95% CI, 0.641-0.763), respectively. Optimal cutoff values were 43 ppb for FENO and 78.5% for FEF_25%-75%, with negative predictive values of 85.38% and 81.34%, respectively. The combined use of FENO and FEF_25%-75% increased the AUC to 0.843 (95% CI, 0.794-0.892), significantly higher than either FENO (P = .012) or FEF_25%-75% (P < .0001) alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Small-airway dysfunction is present in patients with chronic cough and BHR. FEF_25%-75% has value as a negative predictive parameter for BHR, especially when combined with FENO. FENO > 43 ppb and FEF_25%-75% < 78.5% strongly predicted a positive bronchial provocation test.

Normal values of offline exhaled and nasal nitric oxide in healthy children and teens using chemiluminescence

Nitric oxide (NO) can be used to detect respiratory or ciliary diseases. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measurement can reflect ongoing eosinophilic airway inflammation and has a diagnostic utility as a test for asthma screening and follow-up while nasal nitric oxide (nNO) is a valuable screening tool for the diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia. The possibility of collecting airway gas samples in an offline manner offers the advantage to extend these measures and improve the screening and management of these diseases, but normal values from healthy children and teens remain sparse.

METHODS

Samples were consecutively collected using the offline method for eNO and nNO chemiluminescence measurement in 88 and 31 healthy children and teens, respectively. Offline eNO measurement was also performed in 30 consecutive children with naïve asthma and/or respiratory allergy.

RESULTS

The normal offline eNO value was determined by the following regression equation -8.206 + 0.176 × height. The upper limit of the norm for the offline eNO value was 27.4 parts per billion (ppb). A separate analysis was performed in children, pre-teens and teens, for which offline eNO was 13.6 ± 4.7 ppb, 16.3 ± 13.7 ppb and 20.0 ± 7.2 ppb, respectively. The optimal cut-off value of the offline eNO to predict asthma or respiratory allergies was 23.3 ppb, with a sensitivity and specificity of 77% and 91%, respectively. Mean offline nNO was determined at 660 ppb with the lower limit of the norm at 197 ppb.

CONCLUSION

The use of offline eNO and nNO normal values should favour the widespread screening of respiratory diseases in children of school age in their usual environment.

Electronic Noses for Well-Being: Breath Analysis and Energy Expenditure

The wealth of information concealed in a single human breath has been of interest for many years, promising not only disease detection, but also the monitoring of our general well-being. Recent developments in the fields of nano-sensor arrays and MEMS have enabled once bulky artificial olfactory sensor systems, or so-called "electronic noses", to become smaller, lower power and portable devices. At the same time, wearable health monitoring devices are now available, although reliable breath sensing equipment is somewhat missing from the market of physical, rather than chemical sensor gadgets. In this article, we report on the unprecedented rise in healthcare problems caused by an increasingly overweight population. We first review recently-developed electronic noses for the detection of diseases by the analysis of basic volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Then, we discuss the primary cause of obesity from over eating and the high calorific content of food. We present the need to measure our individual energy expenditure from our exhaled breath. Finally, we consider the future for handheld or wearable devices to measure energy expenditure; and the potential of these devices to revolutionize healthcare, both at home and in hospitals.

Setting reference values for exhaled nitric oxide: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The values obtained when the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is measured are affected by several factors that are specific to the individual patient, making interpretation difficult, especially in the initial assessment of patients with respiratory symptoms.

METHODS

Systematic review of studies on FeNO reference values and individual-specific factors that influence them.

RESULTS

From 3739 references, 15 studies were included. Four studies included children and adolescents. In nine studies, samples were selected from the general population. Most studies reported objective measures for atopy (nine studies), but not for smoking status (one). Significant determinants of FeNO values reported were age and height (seven studies), atopy (six), smoking (four), weight (four), sex (three) and race (three). Additional factors were included in eight studies. R2 was reported in only five studies. The logarithmic transformation of FeNO was inadequately described in seven studies.

CONCLUSION

There are several equations for FeNO reference values that may be used in clinical practice, although the factors they include and the statistical methods they use vary considerably. We recommend the development of standard methods for the evaluation of normal FeNO data and that reference equations should be formulated based on a predetermined physiological model.

Exhaled Nitric Oxide Levels Among Adults With Excessive Alcohol Consumption

BACKGROUND

More than one-quarter of the US population qualify as excessive alcohol consumers. Alcohol use impacts several lung diseases, and heavy consumption has been associated with poor clinical outcomes. The fractional excretion of exhaled nitric oxide (Feno) has clinical implications in multiple airways diseases. We hypothesized that excessive alcohol intake is associated with lower Feno levels.

METHODS

To test this hypothesis, we examined a sample consisting of 12,059 participants, aged 21 to 79 years, interviewed between 2007 and 2012 from the National Health and Examination Survey. Two valid Feno measurements that were reproducible were recorded. Alcohol questionnaire data were used to define the following alcohol groups: never drinkers, nonexcessive drinkers, excessive drinkers, and former excessive drinkers. The natural logarithm of Feno values [ln(Feno)] as well as blood eosinophil count and C-reactive protein were used as dependent variables to test the association with alcohol groups including multivariable linear regression models with adjustment for predictors of Feno.

RESULTS

Excessive alcohol consumption comprised 3,693 (26.9%) of the US sample population. Controlling for all other factors, excessive alcohol consumption had a negative association and was an independent predictor for ln(Feno) levels in comparison with the never-drinker group (-0.11; 95% CI, -0.17 to -0.06; P < .001). ln(Feno) levels decreased across categories of increasing alcohol use (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Accounting for alcohol use in the interpretation of Feno levels should be an additional consideration, and further investigations are warranted to explore the complex interaction between alcohol and nitric oxide in the airways.

Association of FEF25-75% Impairment with Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness and Airway Inflammation in Subjects with Asthma-Like Symptoms

BACKGROUND

Forced expiratory flow at 25 and 75% of the pulmonary volume (FEF25-75%) might be considered as a marker of early airway obstruction. FEF25-75% impairment might suggest earlier asthma recognition in symptomatic subjects even in the absence of other abnormal spirometry values.

OBJECTIVES

The study was designed in order to verify whether FEF25-75% impairment in a cohort of subjects with asthma-like symptoms could be associated with the risk of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and with airway inflammation expressed as fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and eosinophil counts in induced sputum.

METHODS

Four hundred adults with a history of asthma-like symptoms (10.5% allergic) underwent spirometry, determination of BHR to methacholine (PD20FEV1), FeNO analysis and sputum induction. FEF25-75% <65% of predicted or <-1.64 z-score was considered abnormal.

RESULTS

All subjects had normal FVC, FEV1 and FEV1/FVC, while FEF25-75% was abnormal in 27.5% of them. FEF25-75% (z-score) was associated with PD20FEV1 (p < 0.001), FeNO (p < 0.001) and sputum eosinophils (p < 0.001). Patients with abnormal FEF25-75% showed higher levels of FeNO and eosinophils in induced sputum than did patients with normal FEF25-75% (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). Subjects with abnormal FEF25-75% had an increased probability of being BHR positive (OR = 13.38; 95% CI: 6.7-26.7; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that abnormal FEF25-75% might be considered an early marker of airflow limitation associated with eosinophilic inflammation and BHR in subjects with asthma-like symptoms, indicating a role for FEF25-75% as a predictive marker of newly diagnosed asthma.

Diagnostic accuracy of fractional exhaled nitric oxide in asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies

BACKGROUND

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) has been proposed as a non-invasive measure of airway inflammation in asthma. However, its accuracy for the diagnosis of asthma in different populations is not completely clear. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of FeNO measurement for the diagnosis of asthma through a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.

METHODS

A systematic search current to July 2014 was performed in Pubmed, EMBASE, Medline, the Cochrane databases, CNKI, Wanfang and Weipu to find relevant studies. All prospective studies on the use of FeNO for the diagnosis of asthma were included.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies including 3983 subjects were analyzed. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for the entire population was 72% (95% CI, 70-74%), 78% (95% CI, 76-80%) and 15.92 (95% CI, 10.70-23.68), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves revealed a receiver-operating characteristic of 0.88. In subgroup analysis, the DOR for patients using corticosteroids, as well as those for steroid-naïve, non-smoking, smoking, chronic cough and allergic rhinitis patients were 4.47 (95% CI, 3.39-5.90), 21.40 (95% CI, 15.38-29.76), 19.84 (95% CI, 15.63-25.19), 5.41 (95% CI, 2.97-9.86), 35.36 (95% CI, 23.90-52.29), and 2.99 (95% CI, 0.85-10.45), respectively.

CONCLUSION

FeNO is accurate for the diagnosis of asthma in steroid-naive or non-smoking patients, particularly in chronic cough patients.

Can exhaled nitric oxide be a surrogate marker of bronchial hyperresponsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate in steroid-naive asthmatic children?

BACKGROUND

The interrelation between airway inflammation, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and atopy remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to document whether exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) may be used as a surrogate marker that predicts BHR to adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) in steroid-naive school children with asthma.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of steroid-naive school age children with atopic and non-atopic asthma. All patients whose eNO levels had been measured and who had been challenged with both methacholine (MCH) and AMP were included. Receiver operation characteristic analysis was performed, in both the atopic and the non-atopic groups, to evaluate the ability of eNO to detect the BHR to AMP.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixteen patients, sixty-nine (59.5%) of whom had been atopic, were included in the analysis. In the atopic group, eNO values were significantly higher in patients with BHR to AMP compared to those without BHR to AMP (51.9 ± 16.9 p.p.b. vs. 33.7 ± 16.4 p.p.b.; P < 0.001), whereas in the non-atopic group, the differences were not statistically significant (29.7 ± 16.9 p.p.b. vs. 22.6 ± 8.1 p.p.b.; P = 0.152). In the atopic group, eNO levels (R(2) : 0.401; β: 0.092; 95% CI: 1.19-14.42; OR: 7.12; P = 0.008) were found to be the only independent factor for BHR to AMP, whereas none of the parameters predicted BHR to AMP in the non-atopic group. The best cut-off value of eNO that significantly predicts BHR to AMP was 33.3 p.p.b. in the atopic group (P < 0.001), whereas a significant cut-off value for eNO that predicts BHR to AMP was not determined in the non-atopic group (P = 0.142). An eNO ≤ 17.4 p.p.b. has 100% negative predictive values and 100% sensitivity and 60.47% PPV for prediction of BHR to AMP in the atopic group.

CONCLUSIONS

Exhaled NO may be used to predict BHR to AMP in atopic but not in non-atopic steroid-naïve asthmatic children.

Nasal nitric oxide as a marker of sinus mucosal health in patients with nasal polyposis

BACKGROUND

Reduced nasal nitric oxide (nNO) has been shown in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) but its clinical significance remains uncertain. The objective of this study was to measure nNO changes in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for CRS and to explore its relationship to clinical measures of sinus mucosal health postoperatively.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of CRS patients undergoing ESS. Patients had the following measurements at baseline and at 1 and 6 months post-ESS: nNO levels, Lund-Kennedy Endoscopy Score (LKES), and 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) score. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 6.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were enrolled, of these 84.6% had CRS with nasal polyps. Baseline Lund-Mackay computed tomography (CT) score was 16.9 ± 5.1. There was a statistically significant increase in nNO levels from baseline to 1 month and 6 months postoperatively (p < 0.0001). The SNOT-22 and LKES followed a similar trend with a significant and sustained improvement at 1 month and 6 months post-ESS (p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis revealed that changes in nNO were driven by the polyp cohort because nonpolyp patients had no significant changes in their nNO postoperatively. No correlation was found between nNO levels and SNOT-22. However, a significant negative correlation was found between nNO and LKES (p < 0.0001), suggesting healthier sinus mucosa was associated with higher nNO levels.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to show that nNO levels may be a marker of sinus mucosal health following ESS in patients with polyps. This has important implications for nNO in its potential etiologic role in mediating ongoing sinus inflammation.

Diagnostic accuracy of exhaled nitric oxide in asthma: a meta-analysis of 4,691 participants

Asthma is a common airway inflammation, but current methods for diagnosing it are poor. Here we meta-analyze the available evidence on the ability of exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) in asthma to serve as a diagnostic marker of asthma. We systematically searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases, published data on sensitivity, specificity and other measures of diagnostic accuracy of eNO in the diagnosis of asthma were meta-analyzed. The methodological quality of each study was assessed by QUADAS-2 (quality assessment for studies of diagnostic accuracy). Statistical analysis was performed by employing Meta-Disc 1.4 software and STATA. And the measures of accuracy of eNO in the diagnosis of asthma were pooled using random-effects models. A total of nineteen publications reporting twenty-one case-control studies were identified. Pooled results indicated that eNO showed a diagnostic sensitivity of 0.78 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.80), specificity was 0.74 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.76). PLR was 3.70 (95% CI 2.84 to 4.81) and NLR was 0.35 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.47). DOR was 11.37 (95% CI 7.54 to 17.13). Exhaled nitric oxide show insufficient sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing asthma, eNO measurements may be useful in combination with clinical manifestations and conventional tests such as pulmonary function tests, assessment of bronchodilator response and bronchial challenge tests.

Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Airway Hyperresponsiveness to Adenosine 5'-monophosphate and Methacholine in Children with Asthma

BACKGROUND

There is increasing interest in the role of indirect bronchial challenges because clinical studies have shown that indirect airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) reflects underlying airway inflammation better than direct AHR. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) appears to be a useful clinical tool for assessing airway inflammation noninvasively. We examined whether FeNO is more closely related to AHR to indirect stimuli than AHR to direct stimuli in children with mild to moderate asthma.

METHODS

Fifty-nine asthmatic children aged 6-16 years without rhinitis, underwent spirometry, FeNO measurement and blood tests for serum total IgE, blood eosinophil count and serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP). All subjects underwent methacholine and adenosine 5-monophosphate (AMP) challenge tests at intervals of 3 days.

RESULTS

In a univariate linear regression analysis, FeNO was significantly associated with both PC20 AMP (R(2) = 0.341, p < 0.001) and PC20 methacholine (R(2) = 0.188, p = 0.001). After adjustment for age, sex, serum total IgE and blood eosinophil count, the association between FeNO and PC20 AMP (β = -1.98, p = 0.001) was more robust than that between FeNO and PC20 methacholine (β = -0.87, p = 0.081). The significant correlation between FeNO and PC20 AMP was observed in the steroid-naïve group (β = -2.48, p = 0.001), but not in the steroid-treated group (β = 0.88, p = 0.463).

CONCLUSIONS

FeNO levels were more closely associated with PC20 AMP than with PC20 methacholine. This relationship could only be seen in the steroid-naïve subjects. These results suggest that FeNO levels in children with asthma may be more closely related to indirect AHR than to direct AHR.

Usefulness of noninvasive methods for the study of bronchial inflammation in the control of patients with asthma

Bronchial asthma is one of the most prevalent respiratory conditions. Although it is defined as an inflammatory disease, the current guidelines for both diagnosis and follow-up of patients are based only on clinical and lung function parameters. Current research is focused on finding markers that can accurately predict future risk, and on assessing the ability of these markers to guide medical treatment and thus improve prognosis. The use of noninvasive methods to study airway inflammation is gaining increasing support. The study of eosinophils in induced sputum has proved useful for the diagnosis of asthma; however, its clinical implementation is complex. Some studies have shown that the measurement of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) may also be useful to establish disease phenotypes and improve control. Others have found that the measurement of pH and certain markers of oxidative stress, cytokines and prostanoids in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) may also be useful as well as the measurement of the temperature of exhaled breath and the analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). In conclusion, since asthma is an inflammatory disease, it seems appropriate to try to control it through the study of airway inflammation using noninvasive methods. In this regard, the analysis of induced sputum cells has proved very useful, although the clinical implementation of this technique seems difficult. Other techniques such as temperature measurement, the analysis of FeNO, the analysis of the VOCs in exhaled breath, or the study of certain biomarkers in EBC require further study in order to determine their clinical applicability.

Exhaled nitric oxide and other exhaled biomarkers in bronchial challenge with exercise in asthmatic children: current knowledge

The fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO), a known marker of atopic-eosinophilic inflammation, may be used as a surrogate to assess exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in asthmatic children. The predictive value of baseline FENO for EIB appears to be influenced by several factors, including age, atopy, current therapy with corticosteroids and measurement technique. Nonetheless, FENO cut-off values appear to be able to rule out EIB. FENO levels decrease during EIB, apparently through neural mechanisms rather than by decreased airway-epithelial surface. Partition of FENO into proximal and peripheral contributions of the respiratory tract may improve our understanding on NO exchange during exercise and help to screen subjects prone to EIB. Other biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress contained in exhaled gases and exhaled breath condensate (EBC) may shed light on the pathophysiology of EIB. Exhaled breath temperature is a promising real-time measurement whose routine use for assessing EIB warrants further investigation.

Contribution of exhaled nitric oxide measurement in airway inflammation assessment in asthma. A position paper from the French Speaking Respiratory Society

Nitric oxide (NO) is both a gas and a ubiquitous inter- and intracellular messenger with numerous physiological functions. As its synthesis is markedly increased during inflammatory processes, NO can be used as a surrogate marker of acute and/or chronic inflammation. It is possible to quantify fractional concentration of NO in exhaled breath (FENO) to detect airway inflammation, and thus improve the diagnosis of asthma by better characterizing asthmatic patients with eosinophilic bronchial inflammation, and eventually improve the management of targeted asthmatic patients. FENO measurement can therefore be viewed as a new, reproducible and easy to perform pulmonary function test. Measuring FENO is the only non-invasive pulmonary function test allowing (1) detecting, (2) quantifying and (3) monitoring changes in inflammatory processes during the course of various respiratory disorders, including corticosensitive asthma.

Alveolar and exhaled NO in relation to asthma characteristics--effects of correction for axial diffusion

BACKGROUND

Inflammation in the small airways might contribute to incomplete asthma disease control despite intensive treatment in some subgroups of patients. Exhaled NO (FeNO) is a marker of inflammation in asthma and the estimated NO contribution from small airways (CalvNO ) is believed to reflect distal inflammation. Recent studies recommend adjustments of CalvNO for trumpet model and axial diffusion (TMAD-adj). This study aimed to investigate the clinical correlates of CalvNO , both TMAD-adjusted and unadjusted.

METHODS

Asthma symptoms, asthma control, lung function, bronchial responsiveness, blood eosinophils, atopy and treatment level were assessed in 410 subjects, aged 10-35 years. Exhaled NO was measured at different flow-rates and CalvNO calculated, with TMAD-adjustment according to Condorelli.

RESULTS

Trumpet model and axial diffusion-adjusted CalvNO was not related to daytime wheeze (P = 0.27), FEF50 (P = 0.23) or bronchial responsiveness (P = 0.52). On the other hand, unadjusted CalvNO was increased in subjects with daytime wheeze (P < 0.001), decreased FEF50 (P = 0.02) and with moderate-to-severe compared to normal bronchial responsiveness (P < 0.001). All these characteristics correlated with increased FeNO (all P < 0.05). Unadjusted CalvNO was positively related to bronchial NO flux (J'awNO ) (r = 0.22, P < 0.001) while TMAD-adjCalvNO was negatively related to J'awNO (r = -0.38, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjusted CalvNO was not associated with any asthma characteristics studied in this large asthma cohort. However, both FeNO and unadjusted CalvNO related to asthma symptoms, lung function and bronchial responsiveness. We suggest a potential overadjustment by current TMAD-corrections, validated in healthy or unobstructed asthmatics. Further studies assessing axial diffusion in asthmatics with different degrees of airway obstruction and the validity of proposed TMAD-corrections are warranted.

Therapeutic applications

The current treatments offered to patients with chronic respiratory diseases are being re-evaluated based on the loss of potency during long-term treatments or because they only provide significant clinical benefits to a subset of the patient population. For instance, glucocorticoids are considered the most effective anti-inflammatory therapies for chronic inflammatory and immune diseases, such as asthma. But they are relatively ineffective in asthmatic smokers, and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or cystic fibrosis (CF). As such, the pharmaceutical industry is exploring new therapeutic approaches to address all major respiratory diseases. The previous chapters demonstrated the widespread influence of purinergic signaling on all pulmonary functions and defense mechanisms. In Chap. 8, we described animal studies which highlighted the critical role of aberrant purinergic activities in the development and maintenance of chronic airway diseases. This last chapter covers all clinical and pharmaceutical applications currently developed based on purinergic receptor agonists and antagonists. We use the information acquired in the previous chapters on purinergic signaling and lung functions to scrutinize the preclinical and clinical data, and to realign the efforts of the pharmaceutical industry.

Airway gas exchange and exhaled biomarkers

During inspiration and expiration, gases traverse the conducting airways as they are transported between the environment and the alveolar region of the lungs. The term "conducting" airways is used broadly as the airway tree is thought largely to provide a conduit for the respiratory gases, oxygen and carbon dioxide. However, despite a significantly smaller surface area, and thicker barrier separating the gas phase from the blood when compared to the alveolar region, the airway tree can participate in gas exchange under special conditions such as high water solubility, high chemical reactivity, or production of the gas within the airway wall tissue. While these conditions do not apply to the respiratory gases, other gases demonstrate substantial exchange of the airways and are of particular importance to the inflammatory response of the lungs, the medical-legal field, occupational health, metabolic disorders, or protection of the delicate alveolar membrane. Given the significant structural differences between the airways and the alveolar region, the physical determinants that control airway gas exchange are unique and require different models (both experimental and mathematical) to explore. Our improved physiological understanding of airway gas exchange combined with improved analytical methods to detect trace compounds in the exhaled breath provides future opportunities to develop new exhaled biomarkers that are characteristic of pulmonary and systemic conditions.

Prognostic value of bronchial provocation and FENO measurement for asthma diagnosis--results of a delayed type of diagnostic study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the prognostic value of FENO with bronchoprovocation testing when the clinical course within the first year after assessment was taken into account; to compare the prognostic values with respect to eosinophilic versus non-eosinophilic inflammatory pattern.

METHODS

Cross-sectional diagnostic study with a delayed-type reference standard in 393 patients attending a private practice of pneumologists with complaints suspicious of obstructive airway disease.

INDEX TEST

FENO measurement. Reference standard: ratio FEV1/VC or airway resistance assessed by body plethysmography, with additional bronchoprovocation or bronchodilator testing, as well as spontaneous sputum (smear slides). This was combined with a follow-up evaluation by a structured interview after 12 months.

RESULTS

302 (76.8%) patients were reached for follow-up. Regarding asthma diagnosis, the area under the curve (AUC) for FENO was 0.603 (95%CI 0.528-0.677) for the whole group. With eosinophilic asthma as target, AUC increased (0.819 (95%CI 0.703-0.934)) and exceeded that of bronchoprovocation (0.711 (95%CI 0.584-0.874)). FENO showed no diagnostic value in non-eosinophilic asthma. In patients reporting wheezing and allergic rhinitis at the initial assessment, its positive predictive value was 90.9% (95%CI 62.3%-98.4) at a cut-off of 45 ppb, and 100% (95%CI 56.6-100%) at 81 ppb.

CONCLUSIONS

FENO bears limited information when measured non-specifically in primary care, but is useful for diagnosing eosinophilic asthma. If sputum is not available, information on wheezing and rhinitis can narrow down the range of patients in whom FENO is informative. Moreover, the evaluation of the clinical value of FENO benefits from taking into account follow-up data to confirm the diagnosis.

A human study model for nitric oxide research in sinonasal disease

Sinus nitric oxide (NO) measurements present a novel and promising approach to help overcome difficulties and confounding variables associated with nasal NO measurements such as the nasal cycle, ostial patency, and individual contribution to total NO production of each sinus. Conflicting results reported on nasal NO measurements in various sinonasal diseases are presumed to originate from the variable diffusion of sinus NO into the nose where it is measured. This study presents a novel technique and research method for direct measurement of sinus NO. The authors' original technique of individual, non-destructive catheterization of the sinuses through their natural ostia is developed and refined to allow accurate measurements of NO produced in the sinuses. Our study indicates that reproducible catheterization of the sinuses through their natural ostia can be performed in the clinical research setting under local and topical anesthesia. The model can be used to test the effects of various conditions on nasal and sinus NO production in a variety of disease models and the variables affecting sinonasal gas exchange can be differentially studied. Volunteer healthy adult human subjects without nasal allergies are used. An endoscopic nasal exam with topical anesthesia followed by in vitro allergy testing is performed to determine eligibility. Sinus computerized tomography (CT) scans are used to delineate anatomic features and to calculate paranasal sinus volumes. Continuous flow sinus air sampling and NO measurement with a chemiluminescence analyzer is obtained through polyethylene tube catheters (PEC) placed endoscopically into an aerated major paranasal sinus. Catheters are introduced through natural ostia under local and topical anesthesia. Nasal and differential sinus NO measurements are performed.

Exhaled nitric oxide as screening tool in subjects with suspected asthma without reversibility

BACKGROUND

As fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) has been evaluated only in certain settings for asthma diagnosis, we investigated whether FeNO values could predict positive methacholine challenge testing (expressed as PD20) in subjects with suspected asthma but without spirometric reversibility.

METHODS

Subjects with asthma-like symptoms and negative bronchodilation test were initially evaluated to undergo FeNO measurement and methacholine bronchial challenge. Diagnostic performance of FeNO to predict PD20 to methacholine <800 μg was examined by constructing receiver-operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

A total of 112 subjects met the inclusion criteria. In all subjects, FeNO >32 ppb was associated with a sensitivity of 0.47 and a specificity of 0.85 for the identification of the PD20 <800 μg (AUC = 0.691, 95% CI = 0.6-0.775, p = 0.00002). In smokers, FeNO >11 ppb was associated with a sensitivity of 0.85 and a specificity of 0.5 for the identification of PD20 <800 μg (AUC = 0.625, 95% CI = 0.45-0.772, p = 0.18), while in atopics a FeNO level >26 ppb was associated with a sensitivity of 0.55 and a specificity of 0.85 (AUC = 0.677, 95% CI = 0.53-0.8, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In subjects with symptoms compatible with asthma but without spirometric reversibility, specific cutoff levels for FeNO levels significantly predict the positive methacholine challenge, with significant confounding factors being atopy and current smoking.

Measurement of exhaled alveolar nitrogen oxide in patients with lung cancer: a friend from the past still precious today

Nitric oxide (NO) is a marker of airway inflammation and indirectly a general indicator of inflammation and oxidative stress. NO is a contributing factor in lung cancer at an early stage and also after chemotherapy treatment of lung cancer. We studied whether exhaled NO levels were altered by three cycles of chemotherapy at diagnosis and after chemotherapy, and whether, directly or indirectly, these changes were related to the course of disease. Also, a correlation of NO levels with other markers of inflammation was performed. We studied 42 patients diagnosed early: 26 men and 16 women with lung cancer. We analyzed blood tests for control of inflammatory markers, functional pulmonary tests, and alveolar exhaled NO. We recorded a decrease in exhaled NO after three cycles of chemotherapy in all patients, regardless of histological type and stage: there were 42 patients with mean 9.8 NO after three cycles (average 7.7). Also, a strong correlation appeared between NO measurements before and after chemotherapy and C-reactive protein (P < 0.05, r = 0.42, before) and (P < 0.045, r = 0.64, after). NO alveolar measurement as an indicator of airway inflammation indicates response to chemotherapy in lung cancer. Also, the inflammatory process in lung cancer was confirmed and indicated response to chemotherapy through an index that is sensitive to inflammatory disease of the airways.

[Interest for evaluation of bronchial inflammation in asthma]

Asthma is a heterogeneous chronic inflammatory disease. The respiratory functional tests are sometimes insufficient to confirm the diagnosis. Other tools are developed to estimate the bronchial inflammation such as tests of bronchial provocation, measure of exhaled nitric oxide, induced sputum and exhaled breath condensate. This review presents these non-invasive methods, approaches their interests on the identification of the disease and the treatment.

Clinical application of exhaled nitric oxide measurement in pediatric lung diseases

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a non invasive method for assessing the inflammatory status of children with airway disease. Different ways to measure FeNO levels are currently available. The possibility of measuring FeNO levels in an office setting even in young children, and the commercial availability of portable devices, support the routine use of FeNO determination in the daily pediatric practice. Although many confounding factors may affect its measurement, FeNO is now widely used in the management of children with asthma, and seems to provide significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than lung function or bronchial challenge tests. The role of FeNO in airway infection (e.g. viral bronchiolitis and common acquired pneumonia), in bronchiectasis, or in cases with diffuse lung disease is less clear. This review focuses on the most recent advances and the current clinical applications of FeNO measurement in pediatric lung disease.

FENO measurement and sputum analysis for diagnosing asthma in clinical practice

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) measurement in pneumologists routine diagnostic work-up; and to determine the impact of the inflammatory pattern on diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

Prospective diagnostic study in 393 patients attending a private practice of pneumologists with complaints suspicious of obstructive airway disease (OAD). Index test was FENO measurement. Reference standard was the Tiffeneau ratio (FEV(1)/VC) or airway resistance as assessed by whole body plethysmography, with additional bronchoprovocation or bronchodilator testing. Morning sputum was analysed with smear slides which were prepared and stained by Giemsa.

RESULTS

154 patients were diagnosed as having asthma (145 diagnoses based on bronchial provocation, 9 based on bronchodilator results), 5 had COPD. For the whole group, asthma could be ruled in at FENO > 71 ppb (PPV 80%; 95% CI 63-90%) and ruled out at FENO ≤ 9 ppb (NPV 82%; 95% CI 67-91%) (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.656; 95% CI 0.600-0.712; p < 0.001). 128 patients delivered sputum. FENO was 44.3 ppb (sd 48.9) in patients with predominant eosinophilic inflammation, 18.5 ppb with neutrophilic inflammation, and 23.1 ppb in others (p = 0.003). Diagnostic accuracy of FENO increased when patients with neutrophilic inflammation were omitted from analysis (AUC = 0.745; 95% CI 0.651-0.838; p < 0.001). Then asthma could be ruled in at FENO > 31 ppb (PPV 82%; 95% CI 63-92%) and ruled out at FENO ≤ 12 ppb (NPV 81%; 95% CI 62-91%).

CONCLUSIONS

FENO measurement can be useful as an additional diagnostic tool in pneumologists' practice. The diagnostic value of FENO could be improved when inflammatory patterns are taken into account.

Effects of low-dose fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination therapy on exhaled nitric oxide and nitrite/nitrate in breath condensates from patients with mild persistent asthma

OBJECTIVE

The long-acting β2-agonist salmeterol in combination with the corticosteroid fluticasone propionate is used in clinical practice for the treatment of mild persistent asthma. Although the effect of fluticasone propionate alone in asthmatic patients is well documented, the effect of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FSC) combination therapy on airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) is not well characterized. Thus, we evaluated AHR, exhaled nitric oxide (FE(NO)), and nitrite and nitrate in exhaled breath condensates (EBCs) from mild persistent asthmatic patients treated with a low-dose FSC (100/50).

METHODS

In this open label study, 18 mild persistent, steroid-naïve asthmatics (age, 22-62 years, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) > 70% predicted, provocative dose resulting in 20% reduction (PD(20)) < 10 mg/mL) were treated with FSC 100/50 for 4 weeks. PD(20) to methacholine, FEV(1), FE(NO), and EBC nitrite and nitrate was measured before and after treatment.

RESULTS

After 4 weeks of therapy with FSC 100/50, FE(NO) decreased from 74 ppb (SD = 37) to 34 ppb (SD = 15) (p < .001). FEV(1) (% predicted) increased from 89.4 (SD = 10.7) to 93.3 (SD = 9.5) (p < .01). The PD(20) for methacholine increased from 3.0 (±3.2) to 10.3 (±8.4) mg/mL (p < .01) in 3 of 18 patients reaching the maximum allowable dose (25 mg/mL). FE(NO) correlated with the log of the methacholine dose. There was no statistically significant change in EBC nitrite and nitrate before and after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of mild persistent, steroid-naïve asthmatics with low-dose combination therapy is effective in rapidly reducing airway inflammation and AHR. Our results suggest different metabolic origins for nitrite, nitrate, and FE(NO) in this group of patients.

Exhaled nitric oxide may predict bronchial hyperreactivity in patients with allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Nowadays it is possible to assess airway inflammation by measuring the fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) during an office visit and there is international consensus on the testing methodology. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether FeNO measurement may be a predictor of bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR).

METHODS

Two hundred eleven patients (196 males, median age 28.5 years) suffering from persistent AR were evaluated. Values for bronchial function (FVC, FEV(1), and FEF(25-75)), bronchial provocation tests (methacholine), exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), a visual analogue scale for nasal and bronchial symptoms, and sensitization were assessed.

RESULTS

A strong and inverse correlation between FeNO levels and BHR severity was found (r = -0.58). FeNO was a predictive factor for BHR, and 37 ppb was found to be the best cutoff (area under the curve 0.90) to define the presence of BHR in patients with AR.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the relevance of FeNO as a possible predictive marker for BHR in AR patients and underlines the close link between upper and lower airways. Thus, FeNO measurement could be a useful screening tool in identifying subjects with rhinitis at risk of developing asthma.

Predictive value of adenosine 5'-monophosphate challenge in preschool children for the diagnosis of asthma 5 years later

We evaluated the predictive values of preschool bronchial challenge with nebulized adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) using the auscultation method for having asthma 5 years later. Preschool AMP challenge had a high negative (90%) and a moderate positive (67%) predictive value for asthma 5 years later. Positive predictive value increased with the age at which the challenge was performed. The degree of preschool response to AMP was associated with the severity of asthma at school age.

Differences in local and systemic inflammatory markers in patients with obstructive airways disease

BACKGROUND

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are characterised by airway and systemic inflammation, but little is known about differences and similarities in inflammatory markers in patients with obstructive airways disease.

METHODS

In 210 adult patients presenting to their general practitioners with symptoms suggestive of obstructive airways disease, lung function, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FE(NO)), blood eosinophils, and serum levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and IgE were measured.

RESULTS

hs-CRP levels were increased in COPD patients (p=0.009), whereas FE(NO), IgE, and eosinophils were increased in patients with asthma (p=0.009, p=0.041, and p=0.009, respectively). In the ROC analysis, hs-CRP had the largest area under the curve (AUC=0.651; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.552 to 0.749), with a specifity of 83% and a sensitivity of 42% for the diagnosis of COPD. FE(NO) was the most accurate marker in the diagnosis of asthma (AUC=0.618; 95% CI 0.529 to 0.706). Serum hs-CRP levels correlated with the number of smoking pack-years (r=0.218, p=0.001) and inversely with lung function parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Levels of serum hs-CRP, IgE, blood eosinophils, and FE(NO) identify distinct aspects of local and systemic inflammation in patients with obstructive airways disease. This might help to differentiate between asthma and COPD in primary care patients when spirometry is not available.