Use of inhaled corticosteroids during the first trimester of pregnancy and the risk of congenital malformations among women with asthma

Complex interplays: Asthma management and maternal‑fetal outcomes in pregnancy (Review)

Asthma, a common chronic respiratory condition, poses unique challenges in pregnancy, impacting both maternal and fetal health. Of note, 8-13% of pregnant women suffer from asthma, a condition that can worsen, stabilize, or improve during pregnancy. These fluctuations necessitate a nuanced management strategy to ensure the health of both the mother and fetus. Adverse outcomes, such as preeclampsia, gestational diabetes and increased cesarean delivery rates are associated with poorly controlled asthma. From a fetal perspective, the risks include preterm birth and a low birth weight. Physiological changes in pregnancy, such as an increased tidal volume and altered drug metabolism due to increased blood volume, complicate the management of asthma. The safety of asthma medications during pregnancy remains a significant concern, with ongoing research into their teratogenic effects. Recent advancements in treatment include the development of biologics and the increased use of personalized medicine, integrating pharmacogenomics and immunological profiling to tailor treatments to individual needs. Digital health tools have also emerged, enabling improved patient monitoring and management. The present review highlights the complex interplay between asthma management and pregnancy outcomes, advocating for comprehensive care approaches that consider the dynamic physiological changes during pregnancy. It underscores the need for ongoing research into the safety of medication and innovative therapeutic strategies to improve health outcomes for pregnant women with asthma and their babies.

Summary of the Dutch Multidisciplinary Practice Guideline on Asthma and Pregnancy

Asthma is the most common chronic respiratory disease in women of childbearing age and during pregnancy. This paper presents a summary of the Dutch multidisciplinary guideline on asthma and pregnancy. The aim of this guideline is to provide structured, where possible, evidence-based recommendations to optimize the management of asthma during pregnancy. The main topics covered in this guideline are preconception counseling, the safety of asthma medications during pregnancy and breastfeeding and risk assessment and monitoring of asthma during pregnancy. Because many caregivers are involved and a uniform approach is desirable, this guideline has been developed in collaboration with all relevant health care providers and patient representatives.

Use of Asthma Medication During Gestation and Risk of Specific Congenital Anomalies

Poorly controlled asthma can affect neonatal outcomes including congenital anomalies, which can be reduced with appropriate asthma care during pregnancy. Although there is a concern regarding the safety of asthma medication use during pregnancy and congenital anomalies, the risk of uncontrolled asthma outweighs any potential risks of controller and reliever medication use. Patient education before and during pregnancy is critical to ensure good compliance to therapy and reduce the risk of poor asthma control.

Asthma in pregnancy: An update

AIM

To update obstetric care providers about asthma management.

SUMMARY

Asthma is the most frequent comorbid chronic illness in pregnancy. Convincing evidence shows that uncontrolled asthma magnifies the risk of maternal, fetal and neonate complications. Unfortunately, one in four women take no inhaler during pregnancy, and it is likely that decreased adherence, rather than changes in pathology, explains uncontrolled maternal asthma. Patient surveys reveal a need for information and reassurance. Although some molecules are preferred in pregnancy, there is currently no basis to withhold any asthma medication - old or new. Biomarkers such as blood eosinophils and fractional exhaled nitric oxide are an effective way to assess the risk of asthma attacks and the likelihood of responding to inhaled steroids. Furthermore, practice-changing trials in mild asthma show that switching reliever-only regimens to as-needed 'controller-and-reliever' therapy is effective. We suggest that applying these changes can alleviate women's concerns and improve outcomes.

Contemporary management and treatment strategies for asthma during pregnancy

Introduction: Asthma is one of the most common conditions that afflict pregnant women. Because uncontrolled asthma in pregnancy affects both maternal and offspring outcomes, careful attention to maintaining control of asthma symptoms throughout pregnancy is of critical importance.Areas Covered: Using a search of PUBMED/MEDLINE for 'asthma and pregnancy,' this article will review the current literature regarding epidemiology and course of asthma in pregnancy, the effects of uncontrolled asthma on both the mother and offspring, and provide an overview of the management, both non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic, of asthma in pregnancy.Expert Opinion: There is a lack of adequate safety information for most medications taken during pregnancy. Future research might allow better methods to predict which women will experience worsening during pregnancy. For now, surveillance systems like pregnancy registries or observational cohort studies can provide safety information for medications used during pregnancy.

Molecular mechanisms governing offspring metabolic programming in rodent models of in utero stress

The results of different human epidemiological datasets provided the impetus to introduce the now commonly accepted theory coined as 'developmental programming', whereby the presence of a stressor during gestation predisposes the growing fetus to develop diseases, such as metabolic dysfunction in later postnatal life. However, in a clinical setting, human lifespan and inaccessibility to tissue for analysis are major limitations to study the molecular mechanisms governing developmental programming. Subsequently, studies using animal models have proved indispensable to the identification of key molecular pathways and epigenetic mechanisms that are dysregulated in metabolic organs of the fetus and adult programmed due to an adverse gestational environment. Rodents such as mice and rats are the most used experimental animals in the study of developmental programming. This review summarises the molecular pathways and epigenetic mechanisms influencing alterations in metabolic tissues of rodent offspring exposed to in utero stress and subsequently programmed for metabolic dysfunction. By comparing molecular mechanisms in a variety of rodent models of in utero stress, we hope to summarise common themes and pathways governing later metabolic dysfunction in the offspring whilst identifying reasons for incongruencies between models so to inform future work. With the continued use and refinement of such models of developmental programming, the scientific community may gain the knowledge required for the targeted treatment of metabolic diseases that have intrauterine origins.

Asthma Medication Use and Risk of Birth Defects: National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2011

BACKGROUND

Evidence regarding associations between maternal asthma medication use and birth defects is mixed.

OBJECTIVE

Estimate associations between asthma medciation use and 52 birth defects using National Birth Defects Prevention Study data from 1997 to 2011.

METHODS

We compared self-reported maternal asthma medication use for 28,481 birth defect cases and 10,894 nonmalformed controls. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (95% CIs) to estimate the risk of birth defects associated with early pregnancy asthma medication use (the month before through the third month of pregnancy), controlling for maternal age, race/ethnicity, body mass index, smoking, folic acid-containing supplement use, and parity. We calculated risks by medication groupings: bronchodilators, anti-inflammatories, and both.

RESULTS

Overall, 1304 (5%) case and 449 (4%) control women reported early pregnancy asthma medication use. We observed an association between asthma medication use and longitudinal limb deficiency (1.81; 95% CI, 1.27-2.58). Early pregnancy bronchodilator-only use was associated with cleft palate (1.50; 95% CI, 1.11-2.02), cleft lip (1.58; 95% CI, 1.12-2.23), longitudinal limb deficiency (2.35; 95% CI, 1.55-3.54), and truncus arteriosus (2.48; 95% CI, 1.13-5.42). Although early pregnancy anti-inflammatory-only use was not associated with the birth defects studied, use of both medications was associated with biliary atresia (3.60; 95% CI, 1.55-8.35) and pulmonary atresia (2.50; 95% CI, 1.09-5.78).

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with previous National Birth Defects Prevention Study analyses, asthma medication use was not associated with most birth defects examined, but we observed modest risks for bronchodilator use and several birth defects. Our findings support maintaining adequate asthma treatment during pregnancy, because early pregnancy asthma exacerbations have been associated with adverse birth outcomes, including birth defects.

ERS/TSANZ Task Force Statement on the management of reproduction and pregnancy in women with airways diseases

This European Respiratory Society/Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand statement outlines a review of the literature and expert opinion concerning the management of reproduction and pregnancy in women with airways diseases: asthma, cystic fibrosis (CF) and non-CF bronchiectasis. Many women with these diseases are now living into reproductive age, with some developing moderate-to-severe impairment of lung function in early adulthood. The statement covers aspects of fertility, management during pregnancy, effects of drugs, issues during delivery and the post-partum period, and patients' views about family planning, pregnancy and parenthood. The statement summarises current knowledge and proposes topics for future research, but does not make specific clinical recommendations.

Uncontrolled maternal chronic respiratory diseases in pregnancy: A new potential risk factor suggested to be associated with anorectal malformations in offspring

BACKGROUND

Chronic respiratory diseases and use of antiasthmatic medication during pregnancy may both play a role in the etiology of congenital anorectal malformations (ARM). However, it is unclear, whether the medication use or the underlying condition would be responsible. Therefore, our aim was to unravel the role of maternal chronic respiratory diseases from that of antiasthmatic medication in the etiology of ARM.

METHODS

We obtained 412 ARM patients and 2,137 population-based controls from the Dutch AGORA data- and biobank. We used maternal questionnaires and follow-up telephone interviews to obtain information on chronic respiratory diseases, antiasthmatic medication use, and potential confounders. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

We observed higher risk estimates among women with chronic respiratory diseases with and without medication use (1.4 [0.8-2.7] and 2.0 [0.8-5.0]), both in comparison to women without a chronic respiratory disease and without medication use. Furthermore, increased ORs of ARM were found for women using rescue medication (2.4 [0.8-7.3]) or a combination of maintenance and rescue medication (2.5 [0.9-6.7]). In addition, increased risk estimates were observed for women having nonallergic triggers (2.5 [1.0-6.3]) or experiencing exacerbations during the periconceptional period (3.5 [1.4-8.6]).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the 95% CIs of most associations include the null value, the risk estimates all point towards an association between uncontrolled chronic respiratory disease, instead of antiasthmatic medication use, with ARM in offspring. Further in-depth studies towards mechanisms of this newly identified risk factor are warranted.

Risk of Postpartum Depression Among Women with Asthma

BACKGROUND

Several epidemiological studies have suggested that the risk of depression is increased in patients with asthma, but the impact of asthma during pregnancy on postpartum depression remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between maternal asthma and postpartum depression in a population-based cohort study retrieved from administrative databases.

METHODS

A cohort of 35,520 pregnancies in women with asthma during pregnancy and 197,057 pregnancies in women without asthma who delivered between 1998 and 2009 was extracted from the Quebec Asthma and Pregnancy Database. They were followed from the day of delivery up to 1 year postpartum. A generalized estimating equation model was used to estimate the adjusted odds ratios of postpartum depression with 95% CIs in women with asthma during pregnancy versus women without asthma.

RESULTS

Postpartum depression within 1 year after delivery occurred in 6.1% of women with asthma versus 2.9% of women without asthma. After adjusting for several potential confounders, including depression/postpartum depression up to 10 years before pregnancy, we found that women with asthma were 58% more likely to experience postpartum depression within 1 year after delivery than women without asthma during pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.50-1.67).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that women with asthma are more likely to suffer from postpartum depression. A close monitoring of signs of depression for pregnant women with asthma is indicated, allowing prompt and efficient interventions if needed.

Methods for the assessment of selection bias in drug safety during pregnancy studies using electronic medical data

Electronic health data are routinely used for population drug studies. Due to the ethical dilemma in carrying out experimental drug studies on pregnant women, the effects of medication usage during pregnancy on fetal and maternal outcomes are largely evaluated using this data collection medium. One major limitation in this type of study is the delayed inclusion of pregnancies in the cohort. For example, in the province of Quebec, Canada, a major pregnancy cohort only captured pregnancies after 20 weeks gestation. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate three methods that can be used to assess the extent of selection bias due to the delayed inclusion of pregnancies. We use causal directed acyclic graphs to explain the source of this selection bias. In an example involving a cohort of pregnant asthmatic women reconstructed from the linkage of administrative health databases from the province of Quebec, we use numerical derivations, a simulation study and a sensitivity analysis to investigate the potential for bias and loss of power due to the delayed inclusion. We find that this selection bias can be partially mitigated by controlling for variables related to (spontaneous or therapeutic) abortion and the outcome of interest. The three proposed methods allow for the pre and post hoc ascertainment of the bias. While delayed pregnancy inclusion selection bias (which includes "live birth bias") can produce substantial bias in pregnancy drug studies, all three methods are effective at producing estimates of the size of the bias.

Using a Mixture-of-Bivariate-Regressions Model to Explore Heterogeneity of Effects of the Use of Inhaled Corticosteroids on Gestational Age and Birth Weight Among Pregnant Women With Asthma

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease, and responses to asthma medications vary noticeably among patients. A substantively oriented objective of this study was to explore the potentially heterogeneous effects of exposure to maternal inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) on gestational age (GA) at delivery and birth weight (BW) using a cohort of 6,197 pregnancies among women with asthma (Quebec, Canada, 1998-2008). A methodologically oriented objective was to comprehensively describe the application of a Bayesian 2-component mixture-of-bivariate-regressions model to address this issue and estimate the effects of ICS on GA and BW jointly. Based on the proposed model, no association between ICS and GA/BW was found for a large proportion of asthmatic pregnancies. However, a positive association between ICS exposure and GA/BW was revealed in a small subset of pregnancies comprising mainly preterm and low-birth-weight infants. A novel application of this model was also subsequently performed using BW z score instead of BW as the outcome variable. In conclusion, the studied mixture-of-bivariate-regressions model was useful for detecting heterogeneity in the effect of ICS on GA and BW in our population of women with asthma. These analyses pave the way for analogous uses of this model for general assessment of exposure effect heterogeneity for these perinatal outcomes.

A Bayesian finite mixture of bivariate regression model for causal mediation analyses

Building on the work of Schwartz et al, Joint Bayesian analysis of birthweight and censored gestational age using finite mixture models in Statistics in Medicine, we propose a Bayesian finite mixture of bivariate regression model for causal mediation analyses. Using an identifiability condition within each component of the mixture, we express the natural direct and indirect effects of the exposure on the outcome as functions of the component-specific regression coefficients. On the basis of simulated data, we examine the behavior of the model for estimating these effects in situations where the associations between exposure, mediator, and outcome are confounded or not. Additionally, we demonstrate that this mixture model can be used to account for heterogeneity arising through unmeasured binary or categorical mediator-outcome confounders. Considering gestational age as a potential mediator, we then illustrate our mediation mixture model to estimate the natural direct and indirect effects of exposure to inhaled corticosteroids during pregnancy on birthweight using a cohort of asthmatic women from the province of Quebec (Canada).

Development of a graphical tool to measure medication adherence in asthma patients: A mixed-methods pilot study

OBJECTIVES

( 1 ) To develop Med-Resp, a graphical tool based on prescription refills to measure adherence and use of asthma medications; ( 2 ) To test the feasibility of implementing Med-Resp in a hospital outpatient asthma clinic; ( 3 ) To explore the effectiveness of Med-Resp to improve medication adherence to asthma controller medications.

METHODS

A sequential exploratory design was used: ( 1 ) Prototype design in collaboration with respiratory physicians and patients via focus groups; ( 2 ) Med-Resp creation based on algorithms developed and applied to prescription refills data recorded in the drug claims database reMed; ( 3 ) Feasibility assessment of the implementation of Med-Resp in the outpatient asthma clinic; and ( 4 ) Exploration of the effectiveness of Med-Resp through a pre-post design.

RESULTS

A total of 29 patients and six respiratory physicians participated in this pilot study. The tool was highly appreciated by the participants, while the majority believed that Med-Resp has the potential to enhance physician-patient communication and aid in treatment decisions. The feasibility of implementing Med-Resp in clinical practice was demonstrated. However, we did not observe an increase in medication adherence in the six months following its implementation.

CONCLUSION

In the clinical setting, the use of prescription refills data may constitute a non-invasive and objective measure of medication adherence. This study highlights the importance of providing clinicians with objective and easily interpretable measures of medication adherence and use in routine clinical practice. Med-Resp has the potential to become implemented on a larger scale if integrated in electronic medical records.

Understanding and diagnosing the potential for bias when using machine learning methods with doubly robust causal estimators

Data-adaptive methods have been proposed to estimate nuisance parameters when using doubly robust semiparametric methods for estimating marginal causal effects. However, in the presence of near practical positivity violations, these methods can produce a separation of the two exposure groups in terms of propensity score densities which can lead to biased estimates of the treatment effect. To motivate the problem, we evaluated the Targeted Minimum Loss-based Estimation procedure using a simulation scenario to estimate the average treatment effect. We highlight the divergence in estimates obtained when using parametric and data-adaptive methods to estimate the propensity score. We then adapted an existing diagnostic tool based on a bootstrap resampling of the subjects and simulation of the outcome data in order to show that the estimation using data-adaptive methods for the propensity score in this study may lead to large bias and poor coverage. The adapted bootstrap procedure is able to identify this instability and can be used as a diagnostic tool.

Collaborative targeted learning using regression shrinkage

Causal inference practitioners are routinely presented with the challenge of model selection and, in particular, reducing the size of the covariate set with the goal of improving estimation efficiency. Collaborative targeted minimum loss-based estimation (CTMLE) is a general framework for constructing doubly robust semiparametric causal estimators that data-adaptively limit model complexity in the propensity score to optimize a preferred loss function. This stepwise complexity reduction is based on a loss function placed on a strategically updated model for the outcome variable through which the error is assessed using cross-validation. We demonstrate how the existing stepwise variable selection CTMLE can be generalized using regression shrinkage of the propensity score. We present 2 new algorithms that involve stepwise selection of the penalization parameter(s) in the regression shrinkage. Simulation studies demonstrate that, under a misspecified outcome model, mean squared error and bias can be reduced by a CTMLE procedure that separately penalizes individual covariates in the propensity score. We demonstrate these approaches in an example using electronic medical data with sparse indicator covariates to evaluate the relative safety of 2 similarly indicated asthma therapies for pregnant women with moderate asthma.

Safety of Drugs during Pregnancy and Breastfeeding in Cystic Fibrosis Patients

Health management of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients should be maximized during pregnancy and breastfeeding because of its significant impact on the maternal and newborn outcomes. Thus, numerous drugs will have to be continued during pregnancy and lactation. Most of the drugs representing CF treatment lines cross the placenta or are excreted into human milk. Research addressing the risks and benefits of drugs used in CF patients during pregnancy and lactation is often incomplete or challenged by limited methodology, which often leads to conflicting or inconclusive results. Yet, potential treatment benefits for CF pregnant patients most often outbalance potential risks for the unborn child.

Pharmacotherapy options to treat asthma during pregnancy

INTRODUCTION

Pregnancy may be complicated by new onset or pre-existing asthma. This article reviews the recognition and management of asthma during pregnancy, paying close attention to the general principles of asthma medication use during pregnancy. Asthma is one of the most common potentially serious medical problems to complicate pregnancy, and asthma may adversely affect both maternal quality of life and perinatal outcomes. Therefore, optimal management of asthma during pregnancy is important for both mother and baby. This article reviews asthma pharmacotherapy during pregnancy, with an emphasis on gestational safety of commonly used medications.

AREAS COVERED

In this review of asthma pharmacotherapy during pregnancy, the most pertinent recent publications are reported. Electronic databases such as PubMed were searched for terms pregnan* or perinat* or obstet* and asthma or wheeze and treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

Although retrospective data have been reassuring, since pregnant women are generally excluded from clinical trials, there is a lack of adequate safety information for most medications taken during pregnancy. One of the most important needs for the future is the availability of further safety information for asthma medications used during pregnancy that can also account for asthma control.

Maternal asthma medication use during pregnancy and risk of congenital heart defects

BACKGROUND

Asthma affects 4% to 8% of pregnant women and studies suggest maternal asthma, particularly when uncontrolled, may be associated with adverse reproductive outcomes.

METHODS

We examined self-reported asthma medication use and the risk of congenital heart defects (CHD) in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, a multi-center, population-based case-control study of selected major structural defects. We evaluated maternal use of bronchodilators and anti-inflammatories during the periconceptional period (1 month before conception through the first 3 pregnancy months) among 7638 infants with CHDs and 8106 nonmalformed controls with estimated delivery dates from 1997 to 2007. We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for 20 types of CHDs.

RESULTS

Among asthma medications reported during the periconceptional period among controls, albuterol accounted for 85.1% of all bronchodilator use, and fluticasone, prednisone, and montelukast accounted for 46.1%, 15.6%, and 14.9% of anti-inflammatory use, respectively. Of the women who reported bronchodilators during the periconceptional period, 71.1% reported use throughout pregnancy and only 29.4% reported concurrent use of an anti-inflammatory. We observed one statistically significant association between maternal bronchodilator use only and anomalous pulmonary venous return (odds ratio 2.3, 95% confidence interval 1.1-4.8) among numerous comparisons.

CONCLUSION

We did not observe statistically significant associations between the reported use of asthma medications during pregnancy and most specific types of CHDs. Despite limitations in our inability to evaluate asthma status and severity, our study suggests that maternal asthma medication use does not substantially, if at all, increase the risk of CHDs.

Safety of Fluticasone Propionate Prescribed for Asthma During Pregnancy: A UK Population-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Asthma is commonly treated during pregnancy, yet data on the safety of asthma medicines used during pregnancy are sparse.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of the inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) fluticasone propionate (FP), alone and in fixed-dose combination with salmeterol (FSC) in terms of the risk of all major congenital malformations (MCMs), compared with all other non-FP ICS.

METHODS

Women with asthma who had a pregnancy between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2010, were identified in the United Kingdom's Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Exposure to asthma medicines during the first trimester of pregnancy was based on issued prescriptions. The mothers' and infants' medical records were linked where possible, and pregnancy outcomes with an MCM diagnosed by age 1 year were identified based on medical codes in the mother's and infant's medical records, including those MCMs prenatally diagnosed that ended in an induced pregnancy termination. The absolute and relative risks of an MCM after different ICS exposures, stratified by the asthma treatment intensity level, were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 14,654 mother-infant pairs were identified, of which 6,174 received an ICS prescription during the first trimester, in addition to 13 first trimester ICS exposed pregnancies that ended in an induced termination after a prenatal MCM diagnosis. In total, 5,362 pregnancies were eligible for the primary analysis at age 1 year. The absolute risk of an MCM after any first trimester FP exposure was 2.4% (CI95 0.8-4.1) and 2.7% (CI95 1.8-3.6) for the "moderate" and "considerable/severe" asthma treatment intensity levels, respectively. The adjusted odds ratios when compared with non-FP ICS were 1.1 (CI95 0.5-2.3) and 1.2 (CI95 0.7-2.0) for the "moderate" and "considerable/severe" intensity levels; risks for any FP and for FSC did not differ substantially.

CONCLUSION

No increase in the overall risk of MCMs was identified after first trimester FP exposure compared with non-FP ICS.

Safety of therapeutic options for treating asthma in pregnancy

INTRODUCTION

Pregnancy may be complicated by new onset or preexisting asthma. Asthma is one of the most common potentially serious medical problems to complicate pregnancy, and it may adversely affect both maternal quality of life and perinatal outcomes. Optimal management of asthma during pregnancy is thus important for both mother and baby.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the recognition and management of asthma during pregnancy, paying close attention to the general principles of asthma medication use during pregnancy. Further, the article reviews the safety of asthma medications commonly used during pregnancy. In this article, the most pertinent recent publications are reported. Electronic databases, such as PUBMED, were searched for terms pregnan* or perinat* or obstet* and asthma or wheeze and treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

Because pregnant women are generally excluded from clinical trials, there is a lack of adequate safety information for most medications taken during pregnancy. One of the most important requirements for the future is the availability of further safety information for asthma medications used during pregnancy that can also account for asthma control.

The Xolair Pregnancy Registry (EXPECT): the safety of omalizumab use during pregnancy

BACKGROUND

For many asthma medications, pregnancy safety data remains insufficient.

OBJECTIVE

The omalizumab pregnancy registry, EXPECT, evaluates maternal, pregnancy, and infant outcomes after exposure to omalizumab, including incidence of congenital anomalies.

METHODS

EXPECT is a prospective, observational study of pregnant women exposed to ≥1 dose of omalizumab within 8 weeks prior to conception or at any time during pregnancy. Primary outcome measures include rates of live births, elective terminations, stillbirths, and congenital anomalies. Data were collected at enrollment, each trimester, birth, and every 6 months up to 18 months post-delivery.

RESULTS

As of November 2012, 188 of 191 pregnant women were exposed to omalizumab during their first trimester. Of 169 pregnancies with known outcomes (median exposure during pregnancy, 8.8 months), there were 156 live births of 160 infants (4 twin pairs), 1 fetal death/stillbirth, 11 spontaneous abortions, and 1 elective termination. Among 152 singleton infants, 22 (14.5%) were born prematurely. Of 147 singleton infants with weight data, 16 (10.9%) were small for gestational age. Among 125 singleton full-term infants, 4 (3.2%) had low birth weights. Overall, 20 infants had congenital anomalies confirmed, 7 (4.4%) of whom had 1 major defect. No pattern of anomalies was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

To date, proportions of major congenital anomalies, prematurity, low birth weight, and small size for gestational age observed in the EXPECT registry are not inconsistent with findings from other studies in this asthma population. Recognizing the small sample size available, no apparent increased birth prevalence of major anomalies or patterns of major anomalies has been observed.

Risk of congenital malformations for asthmatic pregnant women using a long-acting β₂-agonist and inhaled corticosteroid combination versus higher-dose inhaled corticosteroid monotherapy

BACKGROUND

Current recommendations for managing persistent asthma during pregnancy when low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are insufficient include adding a long-acting β₂-agonist (LABA) or increasing the ICS dose. However, there are no data to help clinicians evaluate the safest regimen during pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare the risk of major congenital malformations in asthmatic women exposed to a LABA plus ICS combination and those exposed to ICS monotherapy at higher doses during the first trimester.

METHODS

A cohort of asthmatic pregnant women exposed to ICSs during the first trimester who delivered between January 1990 and March 2009 was established. The primary outcome was major malformation recorded at birth or during the first year of life. Two subcohorts were established as follows: (1) users of a LABA plus low-dose ICS combination or users of a medium-dose ICS and (2) users of a LABA plus medium-dose ICS combination or users of a high-dose ICS. Generalized estimating equations were used to compare the risk of major malformations between the groups.

RESULTS

In one subcohort there were 643 women who used a LABA plus low-dose ICS and 305 who used a medium-dose ICS; the other subcohort included 198 users of a LABA plus medium-dose ICS and 156 users of a high-dose ICS. The prevalence of major malformations was 6.9% and 7.2%, respectively. The adjusted odds ratio for major malformations was 1.1 (95% CI, 0.6-1.9) when a LABA plus low-dose ICS was used compared with a medium-dose ICS and 1.2 (95% CI, 0.5-2.7) when a LABA plus medium-dose ICS was used compared with a high-dose ICS.

CONCLUSION

The risk of major malformations was similar with a LABA plus ICS combination and ICS monotherapy at higher doses, suggesting that both therapeutic options can be considered during pregnancy.

The safety of asthma medications during pregnancy: an update for clinicians

Pregnancy may be complicated by new onset or preexisting asthma. This article reviews the recognition and management of asthma during pregnancy, as well as general principles of asthma medication use during pregnancy.

Relative perinatal safety of salmeterol vs formoterol and fluticasone vs budesonide use during pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Recent asthma guidelines endorse the safety of long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) and of mild and moderate doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) when required to control asthma during pregnancy, yet do not state a preferred medication within each class.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the relative perinatal safety with the use of salmeterol and formoterol (LABAs) and that of fluticasone and budesonide (ICSs) during pregnancy.

METHODS

A subcohort of pregnancies from asthmatic women was selected from health care administrative databases of Quebec, Canada. Low birth weight (LBW) was defined as weight less than 2,500 g, preterm birth (PB) as delivery before 37 weeks of gestation, and small for gestational age (SGA) as a birth weight below the 10th percentile. The effect of treatment with salmeterol vs formoterol and fluticasone vs budesonide on the outcomes was determined with generalized estimating equation models.

RESULTS

The LABA and ICS subcohorts were composed of 547 (385 salmeterol and 162 formoterol users) and 3,798 (3,190 fluticasone and 608 budesonide users) pregnancies, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed for LBW (odds ratio [OR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-1.88), PB (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.56-2.23), and SGA (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.67-2.02) newborns between women exposed to salmeterol vs formoterol or between women exposed to fluticasone vs budesonide (LBW: OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.76-1.52; PB: OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.78-1.49; and SGA, OR: 1.10; 95% CI, 0.85-1.44).

CONCLUSION

This study does not provide evidence of greater perinatal safety for one LABA or one ICS over the other.

Associations of maternal asthma severity and control with pregnancy complications

OBJECTIVES

To assess the associations of maternal asthma severity and control with pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), gestational diabetes and cesarean delivery.

METHODS

A cohort of 41 660 pregnancies from women with and without asthma who delivered between 1990 and 2002 was constructed by linking Québec's administrative databases. Maternal asthma was defined by at least one asthma diagnosis and one dispensed prescription for an asthma medication in the 2 years before or during pregnancy. Asthma severity and control were assessed using validated indexes during the entire pregnancy to study cesarean delivery and 1-year prior to week 20 of gestation to study PIH and gestational diabetes. Generalized Estimation Equation models were used to obtain odds ratios (OR) for PIH, gestational diabetes and cesarean in association with maternal asthma severity and control.

RESULTS

Almost one-third of the women had uncontrolled asthma and up to 5% had severe asthma. Severe asthma increased the risk of cesarean delivery (OR = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.11-1.63) compared with mild asthma, but no association was found between asthma severity and the other outcomes. The level of asthma control was not associated with any of the outcomes, except for a near-significant increased risk of PIH among uncontrolled women (OR = 1.18; 95% CI: 0.97-1.42).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of gestational diabetes was not associated with asthma severity or control, and the risk of PIH was not associated with asthma severity. However, further studies are needed to clarify the association between asthma control and PIH. The increased risk of cesarean among women with severe asthma may be explained by the physician's and patient's concerns over the safety of normal delivery.

Safety of bronchodilators and corticosteroids for asthma during pregnancy: what we know and what we need to do better

Asthma is a common medical condition complicating pregnancy with potentially serious effects on pregnancy outcome. The aim of this review is to provide an update on efficacy and safety of asthma medications, primarily bronchodilators and corticosteroids, used during pregnancy with focus on pregnancy outcome, and, furthermore, to discuss limitations of available studies and point to possible improvements in future studies. A planned series of systematic searches was conducted using the PubMed database. Use of short-acting β2-agonists has generally been established as safe, and the few studies stating otherwise appear to have, perhaps critical, methodological limitations. The safety of long-acting β2-agonists remains to be further investigated, and the few available studies have methodological limitations and, therefore, provide no definite answers, although a very recent study supports the safety of add-on long-acting β2-agonists to inhaled corticosteroids. Inhaled corticosteroids are generally found to be safe, although further research is needed to investigate both the efficacy and safety of high dose therapy with inhaled corticosteroids. Studies have reported associations between the use of systemic corticosteroids and adverse perinatal outcomes, such as preterm birth, low birth weight, and pre-eclampsia. This must, however, be weighed against the potential serious impact of severe, uncontrolled asthma itself on pregnancy outcome. The main obstacle to a valid interpretation of several of the available studies is the inadequate stratification for asthma severity and control. Overall, asthma in itself and not just poor asthma control poses a greater risk to pregnancy outcomes than asthma medication. Nonetheless, more studies focusing on disentangling the effects of asthma alone and asthma medications are needed. Increased use of stratified risk assessments, taking the concept of asthma severity into greater consideration, is much warranted in future studies.

The poorly explored impact of uncontrolled asthma

The goal of asthma management is to achieve disease control; however, despite the availability of effective and safe medications, for many patients asthma remains uncontrolled. One reason for this is the fear of long-term side effects from the regular use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs). Adverse effects of poorly controlled asthma (for example, obesity, pneumonia, and risks to the fetus) can be perceived as side effects of ICSs. Poorly controlled asthma adversely affects children's cardiovascular fitness, while children with well-controlled asthma perform at the same level as their peers. Children with uncontrolled asthma also have a higher frequency of obesity than children with controlled asthma. Stress can affect asthma control, and children with poorly controlled asthma are more likely to have learning disabilities compared with those with good control. In adults, focused attention and concentration are negatively affected in patients with untreated asthma, and patients with asthma are at greater risk for depression. Also, poorly controlled asthma increases the risks of severe asthma exacerbations following upper respiratory and pneumococcal pulmonary infections. ICSs used to improve asthma control have been demonstrated to improve all of these outcomes. Lastly, the risks of uncontrolled asthma during pregnancy are substantially greater than the risks of recommended asthma medications. Treatments to maintain asthma control are the best approach to optimize maternal and fetal health in the pregnancies of women with asthma. The maintenance of asthma control has significant advantages to patients and greatly outweighs the potential risks of treatment side effects.

Incidence and risk factors for exacerbations of asthma during pregnancy

Background

Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases among pregnant women. Acute exacerbations of asthma during pregnancy have an unfavorable impact on pregnancy outcome. This review provides an overview of current knowledge of incidence, mechanisms, and risk factors for acute exacerbations of asthma during pregnancy.

Methods

A narrative literature review was carried out using the PubMed database.

Results

During pregnancy, up to 6% of women with asthma are hospitalized for an acute exacerbation. The maternal immune system is characterized by a very high T-helper-2:T-helper-1 cytokine ratio during pregnancy and thereby provides an environment essential for fetal survival but one that may aggravate asthma. Cells of the innate immune system such as monocytes and neutrophils are also increased during pregnancy, and this too can exacerbate maternal asthma. Severe or difficult-to-control asthma appears to be the major risk factor for exacerbations during pregnancy, but studies also suggest that nonadherence with controller medication and viral infections are important triggers of exacerbations during pregnancy. So far, inconsistent findings have been reported regarding the effect of fetal sex on exacerbations during pregnancy. Other risk factors for exacerbation during pregnancy include obesity, ethnicity, and reflux, whereas atopy does not appear to be a risk factor.

Discussion

The incidence of asthma exacerbations during pregnancy is disturbingly high. Severe asthma – better described as difficult-to-control asthma – nonadherence with controller therapy, viral infections, obesity, and ethnicity are likely to be important risk factors for exacerbations of asthma during pregnancy, whereas inconsistent findings have been reported with regard to the importance of sex of the fetus.

Impact of maternal use of asthma-controller therapy on perinatal outcomes

BACKGROUND

Asthma during pregnancy usually requires treatment with controller medications about which more safety information is needed. The objectives are to assess the impact of the use of long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) and the dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) during pregnancy on the prevalence of low birth weight (LBW), preterm birth (PB) and small for gestational age (SGA).

METHODS

A cohort of women with asthma giving birth from 1998 to 2008 was constructed from Québec (Canada) administrative databases. LBW was defined as weight <2500 g, PB as delivery before 37 weeks' gestation and SGA as a birth weight below the 10th percentile. The impact of the use of LABAs and the dose of ICSs during pregnancy on the outcomes was determined with generalised-estimating-equation models.

RESULTS

The cohort included 7376 pregnancies: 8.8% exposed to LABAs and 56.9% exposed to ICSs. All LABA users also received ICSs. The prevalence of LBW, PB and SGA was 7.7%, 9.5% and 13.5%, respectively. LABA use was not found to be associated with increased prevalence of LBW (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.58 to 1.12), PB (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.61 to 1.15) or SGA (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.70 to 1.20). Mean ICSs doses >125 μg/day (fluticasone-equivalent) were associated with a non-significant trend of increased LBW, PB and SGA.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the possibility of residual confounding due to uncontrolled or more severe asthma or smoking status, the use of LABA and low to moderate doses of ICSs were not associated with increased prevalence of perinatal outcomes. Additional research on higher ICSs doses is required to better evaluate their safety during pregnancy.

The risk of congenital malformations, perinatal mortality and neonatal hospitalisation among pregnant women with asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is conflicting literature on the effect of maternal asthma on congenital malformations and neonatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

This review and meta-analysis sought to determine if maternal asthma is associated with an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched electronic databases for: (asthma or wheeze) and (pregnan* or perinat* or obstet*).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Cohort studies published between 1975 and March 2012 reporting at least one perinatal outcome of interest (congenital malformations, neonatal complications, perinatal mortality).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

In all, 21 studies met inclusion criteria in pregnant women with and without asthma. Further analysis was conducted on 16 studies where asthmatic women were stratified by exacerbation history, corticosteroid use, bronchodilator use or asthma severity.

MAIN RESULTS

Maternal asthma was associated with a significantly increased risk of congenital malformations (relative risk [RR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.02-1.21, I(2)  = 59.5%), cleft lip with or without cleft palate (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.01-1.68, I(2)  = 65.6%), neonatal death (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.11-2.00, I(2)  = 0%), and neonatal hospitalisation (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.03-2.20, I(2)  = 64.5%). There was no significant effect of asthma on major malformations (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.57-3.02, I(2)  = 70.9%) or stillbirth (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.9-1.25, I(2)  = 35%). Exacerbations and use of bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids were not associated with congenital malformation risk.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Despite limitations related to the observational nature of the primary studies, this review demonstrates a small increased risk of neonatal complications among pregnant women with asthma. Further investigations into mechanisms and potential preventive interventions to improve infant outcomes are required.

Asthma drugs and the risk of congenital anomalies

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prevalence of congenital anomalies between the offspring of women exposed and unexposed to asthma drugs during early pregnancy.

DESIGN

Matched cohort study.

DATABASE

The United Kingdom's General Practice Research Database.

PATIENTS

Women exposed to asthma drugs during early pregnancy and a sample of matched unexposed pregnant women.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The prevalence of any anomaly among unexposed and exposed women was 27.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.4-30.6)/1000 pregnancies and 31.3 (95% CI 27.7-35.5)/1000 pregnancies, respectively (relative risk [RR] 1.1 95% CI 1.0-1.3).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that asthma drugs, overall, do not increase the risk of congenital anomalies in the offspring when taken during the first trimester of pregnancy.

Relationship between maternal asthma, its severity and control and abortion

STUDY QUESTION

Are women with asthma, and more specifically those with severe or uncontrolled asthma, at higher risk of spontaneous and induced abortions?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Pregnant women with asthma, notably when uncontrolled, are at higher risk of spontaneous abortion.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Only one study has examined the association between asthma and spontaneous and induced abortions and revealed a modest increase in the risk of spontaneous abortions, particularly in women with more severe asthma and those with previous exacerbations, and a marginal decrease in the risk of induced abortions.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A cohort of pregnancies from asthmatic (n = 15,107) and non-asthmatic (n = 34,331) women was reconstructed by linking three administrative databases from Quebec (Canada), between 1992 and 2002. The cohort included 7870 spontaneous abortions, 14,596 induced abortions and 26,972 live births.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Pregnant women with and without asthma were analyzed. Asthma was defined by at least one asthma diagnosis and one dispensed prescription for an asthma medication in the 2 years prior to or during pregnancy. Asthma severity and control were assessed using validated indexes in the year before the 20th week of pregnancy or the termination of the pregnancy. Logistic polytomous regression models were used to estimate the relationship between asthma and asthma severity and control on the risk of abortion, while adjusting for potential confounders.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The prevalence of spontaneous and induced abortions was 15.9 and 29.5%, respectively. Maternal asthma was associated with an increased risk of a spontaneous abortion [odds ratio (OR) = 1.41; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.33-1.49] and a decreased risk of induced abortions (OR = 0.92; 0.88-0.97). No association was observed between asthma severity and abortion, while uncontrolled asthma increased the risk of a spontaneous abortion by 26% (95% CI: 14-41%) and the risk of induced abortions by 11% (95% CI: 1-21%).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

It is possible that the study results were confounded by imbalances between groups in variables that are not recorded in the databases, but that are known to be associated with spontaneous abortions, such as alcohol consumption, obesity or maternal smoking. However, we performed sensitivity analyses which revealed that these factors are unlikely to explain the observed increased risk for a spontaneous abortion. It is also possible that women with asthma are more likely to have abortions recorded in the databases, because subjects with a chronic disease tend to visit a physician more often than those without asthma. Therefore, our odds estimates for these outcomes may be overestimated when asthmatic women were compared with non-asthmatic women. A further limitation of the study is that it would have been more appropriate to measure the severity and control of asthma only during the pregnancy.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Our cohort is less representative of women in the upper socio-economic level. This is not a threat to internal validity, but it could limit the external validity if the impact of asthma on the risk of abortion differed according to the socio-economic status of the mother. Despite the absence of supporting data, this possibility cannot be completely excluded.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Genentech. L.B. received research grants from Astra-Zeneca, Pfizer, sanofi-aventis, Novartis and Merck for research projects and co-chairs the Astra-Zeneca Endowment Pharmaceutical Chair in Respiratory Health. F.Z.K and A.F. have no competing interests to declare.

Asthma and pregnancy

Asthma is probably the most common serious medical disorder that may complicate pregnancy. A third of pregnant women with asthma will experience worsening of their symptoms, a third will see improvement of their symptoms and a third will see no change. The primary goal is to maintain optimal control of asthma for maternal health and well-being as well as fetal maturation. Vital patient education should cover the use of controller medication, avoidance of asthma triggers and early treatment of asthma exacerbations. Proper asthma management should ideally be started in the preconception period. Since smoking is probably the most modifiable risk factor of asthma, pregnant woman should avoid active and passive smoking. Acute asthma exacerbation during the first trimester is associated with an increased risk of congenital malformations. Poorly controlled asthma is associated with low birth weight, preeclampsia, and preterm birth. Medications used for asthma control in the non-pregnant population are generally the same in pregnancy with a few exceptions. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the preferred controller therapy. Budesonide is the preferred ICS. Long-acting B-agonists (LABA) are the preferred add-on therapy to medium to high dose ICS. Major triggers for asthma exacerbations during pregnancy are viral infections and ICS nonadherence.

Relationship between changes in inhaled corticosteroid use and markers of uncontrolled asthma during pregnancy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To describe changes in inhaled corticosteroid use during pregnancy and markers of uncontrolled asthma, and to evaluate the association between them.

DESIGN

Population-based, cross-sectional study.

DATA SOURCE

Three administrative claims databases in Québec, Canada.

PATIENTS

A cohort of 4434 asthmatic women (4920 pregnancies) who delivered their infants between 1990 and 2002 and who used inhaled corticosteroids before their pregnancy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The average daily doses of inhaled corticosteroids during pregnancy and during the 9 months before conception were compared; the change in use was categorized as discontinuation (reduction of ≥75%), reduction (26-75% reduction), no change (±25% change), or increase (increase of ≥25%). The markers of uncontrolled asthma included at least one asthma exacerbation and the use of three or more doses/week of a short-acting β(2) -agonist during pregnancy. Generalized estimating equation models were used for statistical analyses. In nearly 50% of the pregnancies (2388 [48.5%] of 4920), the women either stopped or reduced their doses of corticosteroid during pregnancy, and these doses were already quite low before pregnancy. The proportion of women who had an asthma exacerbation during pregnancy was 8.2% among women who discontinued corticosteroids and greater than 20% in all of the other groups. All of the groups used frequent doses of short-acting β(2) -agonists. Discontinuing inhaled corticosteroid use during pregnancy was associated with a lower risk of exacerbations (odds ratio [OR] 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-0.54), whereas increasing inhaled corticosteroid use was associated with a higher risk (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.17-1.72), compared with no change in use.

CONCLUSION

Because of residual confounding by asthma severity, our study was not able to show that women who stopped inhaled corticosteroids during pregnancy were at increased risk of having an asthma exacerbation. However, women who stopped corticosteroids tended to have a milder form of asthma, which is reassuring and suggests that women can recognize, to a certain extent, the need to continue taking their controller agents if necessary.

A population analysis of prescriptions for asthma medications during pregnancy

BACKGROUND

It is important to control asthma during pregnancy. However, some studies indicate that women stop or change their asthma medications when they become pregnant.

OBJECTIVE

We used a population database to analyze changes in prescriptions for asthma medications to patients before, during, and after pregnancy.

METHODS

We collected information from a pregnancy database that is part of the population-based pharmacy prescription InterAction Database from the northern Netherlands. Our study cohort comprised 25,709 pregnancies for which prescription data were available. We collected data over a study period of 1 year before pregnancy until 6 months after birth and analyzed data from pregnant women who received at least 1 prescription for asthma medication during the study period (n = 2072), identifying all prescriptions for asthma medication and oral corticosteroids.

RESULTS

Prescriptions for asthma medications did not change during pregnancies from 1994-2003. However, during the 2004-2009 period, there was a significant decrease (P = .017) in prescriptions for asthma medications during the first months of pregnancy compared with the months before pregnancy, especially prescriptions of long-acting bronchodilators. Although most asthma prescriptions continued throughout pregnancy, prescriptions for controller therapies were reduced by 30% during the first months of pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Many women stop or reduce their use of asthma medications when they become pregnant. Strategies to safely control asthma during pregnancy are needed.

Systemic effects of inhaled corticosteroids

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are the mainstay of therapy in asthma, their use raises certain safety concerns. We review the articles appearing in the last year which have addressed the safety of ICSs when used in the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies suggest that patients with asthma as opposed to COPD do not experience an excess risk of pneumonia with ICS use. Patients with respiratory diseases are at increased risk of developing active tuberculosis and this excess risk is exacerbated by the use of high doses of ICSs. ICSs have systemic effects and one result appears to be an increase in the risk of diabetes onset and progression, especially at high doses of ICSs. When examining cases of glaucoma requiring therapy, there was no increase in risk with ICSs even at high current and cumulative doses. Finally, use of even high doses of ICSs during pregnancy does not appear to affect foetal adrenal function.

SUMMARY

ICSs are a highly effective therapy in asthma and have an excellent safety profile at the low doses usually required in asthma. Adverse effects appear mostly at higher doses.

Asthma and rhinitis during pregnancy

Pregnancy may be complicated by new-onset or preexisting rhinitis, or asthma. This article reviews the recognition and management of rhinitis and asthma during pregnancy, as well as general principles of medication use during pregnancy. Asthma is one of the most common potentially serious medical problems to complicate pregnancy, and chronic rhinitis is even more common in pregnant women. Both conditions may substantially affect maternal quality of life and directly or indirectly affect the pregnancy. Optimal management of asthma and rhinitis during pregnancy is thus important for both mother and baby. This article reviews the assessment and management of rhinitis and asthma in pregnant women.

Psychosocial outcomes are related to asthma control and quality of life in pregnant women with asthma

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the psychosocial impact and perceived teratogenic (fetal harm due to medication) risks of asthma treatment (inhaled/oral corticosteroids and β-agonist) during pregnancy.

AIMS

To assess the perception of asthma control, quality of life (QoL), and perceived risks of therapy in pregnant women with asthma.

METHODS

Pregnant women with asthma (n = 125) were recruited between 12 and 20 weeks gestation. QoL (generic: Short Form-12 Health Survey v1, and asthma specific: Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire-Marks (AQLQ-M)) and psychological variables were assessed using the Perceived Control of Asthma Questionnaire (PCAQ), the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, and the Six-Item Short-Form State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-6). Women's perceptions of the teratogenic risks of asthma therapy were also assessed and analyzed for adherence to maintenance inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), poor asthma control, and QoL.

RESULTS

Women reported good QoL (median AQLQ-M total score/maximum score = 0.88/10), moderate ability to deal with asthma symptoms (mean PCAQ score = 42.6/55), positive beliefs about their asthma and low anxiety (median STAI score = 26.7/80). Perceived teratogenic risks for asthma drugs were excessive and class dependent. Women perceived there was a 42% teratogenic risk for oral corticosteroid, a 12% risk for ICSs, and a 5% risk with short-acting β-agonist. Illness beliefs, emotional response to illness (p = .030), age ≥ 30 years (p = .046), and maintenance ICS use (p = .045) were significantly associated with uncontrolled asthma, while maintenance ICS use (p = .023), illness beliefs, consequences (p = .044), timeline (p = .016), and emotional response (p = .015) and anxiety (p ≤ .0001) were significantly associated with reduced QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

In pregnancy, women with asthma experience good QoL but overestimate teratogenic risks of asthma medication. Maintenance ICS use, illness beliefs, and anxiety are associated with impaired QoL and asthma control.

Systematic review of the safety of regular preventive asthma medications during pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To review the safety of regular preventive asthma medications during pregnancy.

DATA SOURCES

The following databases were searched from inception to February 2011: Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and CINAHL Plus.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

The search was limited to human studies published in the English language. Titles of all articles were screened for relevance. Abstracts of relevant articles were scrutinized to confirm relevance before obtaining full text.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Selected articles were read by 2 authors and the accuracy of the data extracted was confirmed.

RESULTS

Thirty-three articles were included in the final review. Small sample size, missing data, inadequate control for confounding factors, and poor documentation of dosage range were common limitations of the studies reviewed. The use of inhaled corticosteroids, cromolyns, and long-acting β(2) agonists during pregnancy was not associated with any particular adverse event, although the fluticasone/salmeterol combination has been associated with poor outcomes in postmarketing studies. Congenital malformations have been reported with leukotriene receptor antagonist exposure during pregnancy, but those women also had exposure to other medications, including oral corticosteroids.

CONCLUSIONS

Some negative outcomes of preventive asthma medications have been reported, although their direct link with medication use is inconclusive. Selection of preventive medications for asthma management during pregnancy should be based on an assessment of the risks and benefits of medication use versus the risks of poorly controlled asthma.

Inhaled corticosteroids vs. leukotriene-receptor antagonists and asthma exacerbations in children

BACKGROUND

Compared to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), better use of leukotriene-receptor antagonists (LTRA) may lead to a greater reduction in exacerbations among asthmatic children in real-life settings.

METHODS

To test this hypothesis, we used the Quebec administrative databases and identified a cohort of 27,355 asthmatic children aged 5-15 years in whom ICS or LTRA monotherapy was initiated in 1998-2005. The primary outcome was the rate of moderate-or-severe asthma exacerbations (emergency department visit or hospitalization for asthma or a dispensed prescription of oral corticosteroids) over the subsequent year. The adjusted rate ratios (RR) of asthma exacerbations were estimated with Poisson regression models. To minimize confounding by indication, all analyses were stratified by the presence or not of an asthma exacerbation in the year before treatment initiation. We also measured the proportion of days with supply prescribed and patient's adherence with the Proportion of Prescribed Days Covered (PPDC).

RESULTS

The risk of exacerbations was significantly higher in the ICS than the LTRA group among children with no previous exacerbation (RR = 2.3; 95% CI:1.3-4.0), but not in those with ≥1 exacerbations (RR = 1.6; 0.8-3.1). The PPDC was similar between the groups (66%) but the proportion of days with supply prescribed was significantly higher in the LTRA than the ICS group (52% vs. 34%), resulting in higher use.

CONCLUSIONS

While confounding by indication cannot be firmly ruled out, ICS appears to be more frequently prescribed as an intermittent than a daily controller therapy resulting in less use, which may contribute to the apparent lower effectiveness compared to LTRA.

Asthma in pregnancy

Worldwide the prevalence of asthma among pregnant women is on the rise, and pregnancy leads to a worsening of asthma for many women. This article examines the changes in asthma that may occur during pregnancy, with particular reference to asthma exacerbations. Asthma affects not only the mother but the baby as well, with potential complications including low birth weight, preterm delivery, perinatal mortality, and preeclampsia. Barriers to effective asthma management and opportunities for optimized care and treatment are discussed, and a summary of the clinical guidelines for the management of asthma during pregnancy is presented.

Asthma in pregnancy: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management

Asthma is a common, potentially serious, even life-threatening, chronic medical condition seen amongst nearly all groups of patients, regardless of ethnicity and socioeconomic circumstances. This article addresses the group of pregnant women with symptomatic asthma as well as those whose asthma is asymptomatic as a result of good control. The incidence, the pathophysiologic changes of pregnancy, and the interplay between these changes and asthma are reviewed in this article. The classification of these patients and appropriate management strategies are discussed.

Effect of maternal asthma on the risk of specific congenital malformations: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of consensus in the literature about the effect of maternal asthma on the development of congenital malformations.

OBJECTIVE

To further examine the association between maternal asthma and the risk of congenital malformations.

METHODS

A cohort of 41,637 pregnancies from women with and without asthma who delivered between 1990 and 2002 was reconstructed by linking three Quebec (Canada) administrative databases. All cases of malformations were identified using either the medical services or the hospital databases. The main exposure was maternal asthma, defined by the presence of at least one asthma diagnosis and at least one prescription for an asthma medication at any time in the two years before or during pregnancy. Generalized Estimation Equation models were performed to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of congenital malformations as a function of maternal asthma.

RESULTS

The crude prevalences of any congenital malformation were 9.5% and 7.5% for women with and without asthma, respectively. Maternal asthma was significantly associated with an increased risk of any malformation (OR=1.30; 95% CI: 1.20-1.40) and three specific groups (at the 0.0028 level): nervous system (excluding spina bifida: OR=1.83; 1.37-2.83); respiratory system (OR=1.75; 1.21-2.53); and digestive system (OR=1.48; 1.19-1.85).

CONCLUSIONS

Maternal asthma increases the risk of specific groups of congenital malformations. The disease itself, through fetal oxygen impairment, is likely to play a role in this increased risk, but more research is needed to disentangle the relative effect of asthma and medications used to treat this disease.

High doses of inhaled corticosteroids during the first trimester of pregnancy and congenital malformations

BACKGROUND

Although reassuring data exist on the use of low-to-moderate doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) during pregnancy, there are inadequate data for women receiving high doses.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between doses of ICS during the first trimester of pregnancy and the risk of congenital malformations among women with asthma.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study of 13,280 pregnancies of women with asthma (1990-2002) by linking 3 administrative databases from Quebec (Canada). By using generalized estimation equation models, we compared women taking >0 to 1000 microg/d ICS (beclomethasone dipropionate-chlorofluorocarbone equivalent) with women taking >1000 microg/d and those not taking ICSs. The main outcome measures were all and major congenital malformations.

RESULTS

We identified 1257 infants with a congenital malformation (9.5%) and 782 infants with a major malformation (5.9%). We found that women who used >1000 microg/d ICS (n = 154) were significantly more likely (63%) to have a baby with a malformation than the 4392 women who used >0 to 1000 microg/d (adjusted risk ratio, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.02-2.60). On the other hand, women who used >0 to 1000 microg/d were not found to be more at risk than women who did not use ICSs during the first trimester (n = 8734). Nonsignificant trends of similar magnitude were found for major malformations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study adds evidence on the safety of low-to-moderate doses of ICS taken during the first trimester but raises concerns about high doses. However, we cannot rule out the possibility of residual confounding by severity in this association.

Analysis of inhaled corticosteroid selection in patients with bronchial asthma using a questionnaire survey--effects of age, gender, and disease severity

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) has played an important role in the management of asthma. Although several kinds of ICSs are currently available, there is no established strategy for ICS selection.

METHODS

Using the data from the 2004 questionnaire surveys by the Niigata Asthma Treatment Study Group, we analyzed relationships between each patient and the ICS employed on the basis of patient background, asthma control and treatment, and indicated characteristics of ICS selection by the physician.

RESULTS

Of 2852 cases, 2279 (79.9%) were ICS users, and 1513 (66.4% of ICS users) were classified as being in the fluticasone propionate (FP) group, 438 (19.2%) in the budesonide (BUD) group, and 240 (10.5%) in the hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone (HFA-BDP) group, indicating that FP was a standard ICS in this study. The mean age was significantly lower in the BUD group (52.3+/-18.2 years) and was significantly higher in the HFA-BDP group (59.9+/-17.0 years) than that in the FP group (55.8+/-16.6 years). The proportion of female patients was significantly higher not in the HFA-BDP (46.5%) but in the BUD group (59.0%) than in the FP group (51.1%). These results indicated that BUD was frequently prescribed to young female and HFA-BDP was employed in the elderly patients irrespective of gender compared with FP.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that ICS selection is reasonably adapted to each patient's background at least in the surveyed area. We need to elucidate the characteristics of ICS selection further in the future as new ICS and devices are developed.

[Asthma and pregnancy. Review of the current literature and management according to the GINA 2006-2007 guidelines]

INTRODUCTION

Many pregnant women are asthmatics and maternal asthma is a source of questions and complications concerning both the progress of the pregnancy itself and the impact on the foetus. In this situation good asthma control is essential as the disease can deteriorate with acute exacerbations, possibly precipitated by reduction or even withdrawal of treatment on account of fear of teratogenicity.

BACKGROUND

Even though asthma treatments are not totally harmless during pregnancy, their use has been validated by several studies and guidelines. To help clinicians, we undertake here a review of the complications induced by maternal asthma and its medications, and then suggest management guidelines according to the most recent publications.

CONCLUSIONS

The risks and benefits of asthma treatments should be explained in a real partnership between the patient and her general practitioner and specialists (obstetrician, chest physician or allergist). In order to reduce complications to both mother and child, perfect control of asthma is required and inhaled steroids remain the treatment of choice for partially or uncontrolled asthma in the pregnant woman.

Discontinuation of antihypertensive drug use during the first trimester of pregnancy and the risk of preeclampsia and eclampsia among women with chronic hypertension

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to investigate the association between the discontinuation of antihypertensive medication use during the first trimester of pregnancy and the risk of preeclampsia and eclampsia.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a nested case-control approach within a cohort that was reconstructed from the linkage of 3 databases. To be included in the study, women had to match the following criteria: (1) between 15-45 years old on the first day of gestation, (2) covered by Québec's Drug Insurance Plan for at least 12 months before and during pregnancy, (3) exposed to an antihypertensive drug on the first day of gestation, and (4) have had a delivery. Multivariate conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate the risk.

RESULTS

Adjusting for confounders, the odds ratio was 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-1.56.

CONCLUSION

Our finding does not support the presence of a statistically significant association between antihypertensive discontinuation during the first trimester of pregnancy and the risk of preeclampsia and eclampsia.