Response to aerosol salbutamol, SCH 1000, and placebo in cystic fibrosis

Short-acting inhaled bronchodilators for cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Respiratory disease is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in cystic fibrosis (CF), and many different therapies are used by people with CF in the management of respiratory problems. Bronchodilator therapy is used to relieve symptoms of shortness of breath and to open the airways to allow clearance of mucus. Despite the widespread use of inhaled bronchodilators in CF, there is little objective evidence of their efficacy. A Cochrane Review looking at both short- and long-acting inhaled bronchodilators for CF was withdrawn from the Cochrane Library in 2016. That review has been replaced by two separate Cochrane Reviews: one on long-acting inhaled bronchodilators for CF, and this review on short-acting inhaled bronchodilators for CF. For this review 'inhaled' includes the use of pressurised metered dose inhalers (MDIs), with or without a spacer, dry powder devices and nebulisers.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate short-acting inhaled bronchodilators in children and adults with CF in terms of clinical outcomes and safety.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books on 28 March 2022 and searched trial registries for any new or ongoing trials on 12 April 2022. We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs that looked at the effect of any short-acting inhaled bronchodilator delivered by any device, at any dose, at any frequency and for any duration compared to either placebo or another short-acting inhaled bronchodilator in people with CF. We screened references as per standard Cochrane methodology.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB 1 tool. Where we were not able to enter data into our analyses we reported results directly from the papers. We assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 11 trials from our systematic search, with 191 participants meeting our inclusion criteria; three of these trials had three treatment arms. Eight trials compared short-acting inhaled beta-2 agonists to placebo and four trials compared short-acting inhaled muscarinic antagonists to placebo. Three trials compared short-acting inhaled beta-2 agonists to short-acting inhaled muscarinic antagonists. All were cross-over trials with only small numbers of participants. We were only able to enter data into the analysis from three trials comparing short-acting inhaled beta-2 agonists to placebo. Short-acting inhaled beta-2 agonists versus placebo All eight trials (six single-dose trials and two longer-term trials) reporting on this comparison reported on forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), either as per cent predicted (% predicted) or L. We were able to combine the data from two trials in a meta-analysis which showed a greater per cent change from baseline in FEV1 L after beta-2 agonists compared to placebo (mean difference (MD) 6.95%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.88 to 12.02; 2 trials, 82 participants). Only one of the longer-term trials reported on exacerbations, as measured by hospitalisations and courses of antibiotics. Only the second longer-term trial presented results for participant-reported outcomes. Three trials narratively reported adverse events, and these were all mild. Three single-dose trials and the two longer trials reported on forced vital capacity (FVC), and five trials reported on peak expiratory flow, i.e. forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% (FEF25-75). One trial reported on airway clearance in terms of sputum weight. We judged the certainty of evidence for each of these outcomes to be very low, meaning we are very uncertain about the effect of short-acting inhaled beta-2 agonists on any of the outcomes we assessed. Short-acting inhaled muscarinic antagonists versus placebo All four trials reporting on this comparison looked at the effects of ipratropium bromide, but in different doses and via different delivery methods. One trial reported FEV1 % predicted; three trials measured this in L. Two trials reported adverse events, but these were few and mild. One trial reported FVC and three trials reported FEF25-75. None of the trials reported on quality of life, exacerbations or airway clearance. We judged the certainty of evidence for each of these outcomes to be very low, meaning we are very uncertain about the effect of short-acting inhaled muscarinic antagonists on any of the outcomes we assessed. Short-acting inhaled beta-2 agonists versus short-acting inhaled muscarinic antagonists  None of the three single-dose trials reporting on this comparison provided data we could analyse. The original papers from three trials report that both treatments lead to an improvement in FEV1 L. Only one trial reported on adverse events; but none were experienced by any participant. No trial reported on any of our other outcomes. We judged the certainty of evidence to be very low, meaning we are very uncertain about the effect of short-acting inhaled beta-2 agonists compared to short-acting inhaled muscarinic antagonists on any of the outcomes we assessed.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

All included trials in this review are small and of a cross-over design. Most trials looked at very short-term effects of inhaled bronchodilators, and therefore did not measure longer-term outcomes. The certainty of evidence across all outcomes was very low, and therefore we have been unable to describe any effects with certainty.

Effect of Salbutamol on Lung Ventilation in Children with Cystic Fibrosis: Comprehensive Assessment Using Spirometry, Multiple-Breath Washout, and Functional Lung Magnetic Resonance Imaging

BACKGROUND

Inhalation therapy is one of the cornerstones of the daily treatment regimen in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Recommendations regarding the addition of bronchodilators, especially salbutamol are conflicting due to the lack of evidence. New diagnostic measures such as multiple-breath washout (<underline>MBW)</underline> and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have the potential to reveal new insights into bronchodilator effects in patients with CF.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to comprehensively assess the functional response to nebulized inhalation with salbutamol in children with CF.

METHODS

Thirty children aged 6-18 years with stable CF performed pulmonary function tests, MBW, and matrix pencil-MRI before and after standardized nebulized inhalation of salbutamol.

RESULTS

Lung clearance index decreased (improved) by -0.24 turnover (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.53 to 0.06; p = 0.111). Percentage of the lung volume with impaired fractional ventilation and relative perfusion decreased (improved) by -0.79% (CI: -1.99 to 0.42; p = 0.194) and -1.31% (CI: -2.28 to -0.35; p = 0.009), respectively. Forced expiratory volume (FEV1) increased (improved) by 0.41 z-score (CI: 0.24-0.58; p < 0.0001). We could not identify specific clinical factors associated with a more pronounced effect of salbutamol.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a positive short-term effect of bronchodilator inhalation on FEV1 in patients with CF, which is independent of ventilation inhomogeneity. Heterogeneous response between patients suggests that for prediction of a therapeutic effect this should be tested by spirometry in every patient individually.

Management of Pulmonary Disease in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis

Cystic fibrosis is the most common, life-shortening autosomal recessive disease, affecting approximately 1 in 3400 live births in the United States. Gastrointestinal and pulmonary manifestations are most common. With the introduction of pancreatic enzyme and vitamin supplementation, lung disease accounts for the vast majority of morbidity and mortality in patients with cystic fibrosis. The lungs of cystic fibrosis patients are essentially normal at birth but demonstrate evidence of airway inflammation and infection in early infancy. A vicious cycle of inflammation, infection and obstruction ultimately leads to destruction of airways, impairment of gas exchange and death.

Current pharmacological management of pulmonary disease targets reducing airway obstruction, controlling infection and more recently, controlling inflammation. An increased recovery of unusual and highly resistant bacteria from patients with more advanced disease has been observed. Aggressive treatment of acute pulmonary exacerbations with combination antibiotic therapy for two to three weeks has shown pronounced beneficial effects. The routine use of prophylactic antistaphylococcal antibiotics is still controversial.

Although current pharmacologic treatment is symptomatic, new agents are being developed and studied that target the underlying defect in the CFTR protein. This review focuses on current pharmacologic management of pulmonary disease in patients with cystic fibrosis and the role of new agents emerging for the treatment of this disease.

WITHDRAWN: Inhaled bronchodilators for cystic fibrosis

This review has been withdrawn because it has been split into the following reviews: 'Long‐acting inhaled bronchodilators for cystic fibrosis' and 'Short‐acting inhaled bronchodilators for cystic fibrosis'.

The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.

Inhaled bronchodilators for cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Recurrent wheeze and breathlessness are common in people with cystic fibrosis, and bronchodilators are commonly prescribed. Despite their wide-scale and often long-term use, there is limited objective evidence about their efficacy in cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of inhaled bronchodilators in children and adults with cystic fibrosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic databases searches, and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. Latest search of the Group's Trials Register: August 2005

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised trials comparing inhaled bronchodilators to placebo or another inhaled bronchodilator in people with CF, diagnosed clinically and by sweat or genetic testing and at all stages and severity of lung disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. If data were missing, the primary author was contacted where possible. The data were subgrouped into classes of bronchodilator and for each class into short-term effects (less than one week) and long-term effects (greater or equal to one week).

MAIN RESULTS

The search identified 43 references. Fourteen trials, with a total of 257 participants, were suitable for inclusion. The trials were all cross-over in design; in this case a meta-analysis was not possible. There were varied conclusions from the different trials, reflecting their heterogeneity. Compared to placebo, short-acting beta-2 agonists increased forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV(1)) in the short term in three out of five trials, and in the long-term increased peak expiratory flow rate in individuals who had been shown to have bronchial hyperreactivity or bronchodilator responsiveness or both. Compared to placebo, long-acting beta-2 agonists increased FEV(1) and forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of expiratory flow (FEF 25-75%) in the short term in participants known to have bronchodilator responsiveness, but produced inconsistent results in long-term trials. Short acting-anticholinergics had no consistent effect on lung function tests in either the short or the long term. We found no published trials of fenoterol, formoterol or tiotropium and the use of these agents in cystic fibrosis cannot be supported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

It was not possible to determine fully the effectiveness of inhaled bronchodilators in cystic fibrosis as a meta-analysis was not possible. However, both short and long-acting beta-2 agonists can be beneficial both in the short and long term in individuals with demonstrable bronchodilator responsiveness or bronchial hyperrresponsiveness.

Airways reactivity in patients with CF

Airways reactivity, hyper-reactivity, and hyper-responsiveness are terms used to describe airways for which there appears to be increased bronchial smooth muscle tone or responsiveness. Some patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) have concomitant asthma causing airway hyperresponsiveness as manifested by recurrent acute symptoms of dyspnea that is impressively responsive to an inhaled beta 2 agonist and/or systemic corticosteroids. However, many others have a degree of bronchodilator responsiveness in the absence of an impressive clinical response to such anti-asthmatic treatment. In contrast to those with asthma, exercise does not induce bronchospasm and can even cause bronchodilatation in patients with CF who have bronchodilator responsiveness in the absence of asthma. The airway hyperresponsiveness of CF also differs in its response to histamine induced bronchospasm which is effectively reversed with ipratropium in patients with CF who symptomatically do not have asthma, whereas ipratropium does not adequately reverse histamine-induced bronchospasm in those with concomitant symptoms of asthma. These and other data suggest that the increased airway reactivity in patients with CF is vagally mediated and results from the airway damage caused by the lung disease. The use of bronchodilators as a routine part of CF lung disease care is controversial, but there is little evidence that treating airway reactivity in patients with CF is of clinical importance as a routine measure in the absence of clinical asthma. Definite subjective improvement in symptoms or improved sputum production when a bronchodilator precedes chest physical therapy should be sought to justify continued use in individual patients.

Effects of standard and high doses of salmeterol on lung function of hospitalized patients with cystic fibrosis

In a recent investigation we found that hospitalized patients with cystic fibrosis who received 0.5 cc of 0.5% albuterol nebulizer solution TID significantly increased their pulmonary function across the day, but fell back to baseline overnight. To determine whether this fall could be prevented by the long-acting beta-2 agonist salmeterol at both standard (2 puffs: 42 mcg BID) and high (4 puffs, 84 mcg BID) doses, we evaluated the effects of salmeterol vs. albuterol (2 puffs, 180 mcg QID, and 4 puffs, 360 mcg BID) in a placebo-controlled three-way random crossover, double-blind trial. Eighteen patients in the low-dose group and 10 of the same 18 patients in the high-dose group completed the 3 consecutive days of testing and received either salmeterol, albuterol, or placebo with each of four chest physiotherapy sessions given at 7 AM, 11 AM, 3 PM, and 7 PM. At standard doses (2 puffs), the mean percent changes in FEV1 pre- to post-7 AM therapy for salmeterol (5.5%) and albuterol (9.9%) were significantly greater than with placebo (-1.2%) (P < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively). The mean percent changes in FEV1 from morning baseline with salmeterol were also significantly greater than placebo before 3 PM (12.1% vs. 5.4%, P < 0.01), and neither albuterol nor salmeterol were significantly greater than placebo after 3 PM. At standard doses there was a significant carryover effect with salmeterol to the next morning for the FEV1 (7.3%) when compared to placebo (1.5%) and albuterol (-0.7%) (P < 0.05 and 0.05, respectively). At high doses (4 puffs), the mean percent change in FEV1 with pre- to post-7 AM therapy increased to 22.7% and remained significantly greater than with placebo until pretherapy at 7 PM. The carryover effect the next morning was 14.7%. Salmeterol at 4 puffs compared favorably to albuterol nebulizer therapy given TID in both the incidence of responders for the FEV1 (70% vs. 71%) and the mean changes after therapy at 7 AM (22.7% vs. 14.9%), and provided greater carryover effects to the next morning (14.7% vs. -0.7%), thus preventing the fall in pulmonary function back to baseline overnight. We recommend the use of high-dose salmeterol in hospitalized patients with FVC values of 40% of predicted or greater, starting with 2 and increasing to 4 puffs BID as tolerated.

A placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of the long-term effects of albuterol administration in patients with cystic fibrosis

This placebo-controlled study was designed to confirm a previously performed open label study that showed significant improvement in spirometry on maintenance therapy with albuterol for 1 year. In a double-blind, cross-over trial, albuterol (by metered dose inhaler) 180 microg b.i.d. or placebo were given for 6 months each. Spirometry was monitored at the start, and 3 and 6 months following initiation of each arm of the study. Peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) was measured twice daily at home before and after study drug administration. Only patients with clinically detectable lung disease were enrolled. Twenty-one patients finished the study. All spirometric tests showed a significant improvement from start to end of the 6 month treatment with albuterol; there was no significant change on placebo. Forced vital capacity improved by 8.2% and forced expiratory volume in 1 s by 12.1% on albuterol therapy. Nevertheless, there was no significant difference between change on albuterol and change on placebo. Home measurements of PEFR showed a significant improvement of 4.7% on albuterol and a non-significant change of 2.0% on placebo from the first to the last week of treatment. None of the long-term improvements (spirometry or home PEFR) correlated with mean daily bronchodilation. For albuterol, the number of days of hospitalization was less than half that for patients on placebo (1.0/patient on albuterol versus 2.6 on placebo), but this did not reach statistical significance. These results suggest a beneficial effect from maintenance therapy with albuterol. Bronchodilation alone probably cannot explain the long-term benefits of albuterol, and other mechanisms may play a role. The lack of significant difference between change on albuterol and change on placebo is probably due to too small a number of patients in this study and lack of statistical power.

Genetic and immunologic aspects of cystic fibrosis

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Reading this article will enable the readers to reinforce their knowledge of the pathophysiology of cystic fibrosis (CF), the pathogenesis of the lung disease, the criteria for diagnosis, and CF genotype/phenotype relationships. The focus of this review is on the genetic and immunologic aspects of CF.

DATA SOURCE

Relevant articles, current texts, data presented at the annual North American Cystic Fibrosis Conferences and distributed to the Directors of CF Centers by the CF Foundation were reviewed. A MEDLINE database using subject keywords was searched from 1987 to date. Background information derived from the author's 33 years of clinical experience at three of the CF Foundation's CF Care, Teaching and Resource Centers was also included.

STUDY SELECTION

Since CF is an inherited disorder, the genetic aspects are emphasized. With the cloning of the CF gene, DNA analysis has assumed an important role in confirming the clinical diagnosis and in the improved understanding of the pathophysiology of this disorder. Although DNA testing is highly specific, it is not very sensitive.

RESULTS

Cystic fibrosis gene structure and function are described briefly. The pathophysiology of CF, as it relates to the CF gene defect, and the current knowledge of the pathogenesis of the lung disease are reviewed. The criteria for the diagnosis proposed by the Clinical Practice Guidelines for CF are discussed. Problems of establishing the diagnosis and the importance of correlations of laboratory and clinical findings in CF are emphasized.

CONCLUSIONS

As a multisystem disorder, CF can masquerade as other disorders, including allergic respiratory disease. Primary care physicians often refer patients to allergists/immunologists because of recurrent respiratory problems. This review discusses the genetic heterogeneity of CF.

Management of the Child With Cystic Fibrosis

Cystic fibrosis is one of the most common lethal inherited diseases among the Caucasian population, with an incidence of 1 in 2,000. With the progress made in the management of the disease, a once-regarded childhood illness has now an improved survival rate of up to 30 years. It is a multifaceted disease affecting a number of organ systems primarily pulmonary and gastrointestinal tract, with the former leading to most of the mortality. Therefore, good pulmonary toilet, including daily chest physiotherapy and appropriate antibiotic treatment for acute pulmonary exacerbations, remains the cornerstone of therapy. Disease-specific pharmacokinetics seen in these patients require special dosing considerations specifically for antibiotics to ensure adequate serum concentrations. In addition, bronchodilators, steroids, and mucolytics also play a role. With respect to the gastrointestinal tract, pancreatic insufficiency occurs and requires enzyme replacement. Intestinal obstruction may occur as early as the neonatal period, as "meconium ileus," and recur throughout the patient's lifespan. More recent modalities including chloride-channel facilitators, antiproteases, and gene therapy may hold promise to further improve the survival and quality of life in these individuals. The pharmacists' role is vital, especially with the unique pharmacokinetic considerations specific to this population and the complexity of medications necessary for appropriate management of the disease. Copyright © 1996 by W.B. Saunders Company

Effectiveness of bronchodilators in cystic fibrosis

Bronchodilators (xanthines, adrenergics, and parasympatholytics) have been used for years in the treatment of airway obstruction associated with cystic fibrosis. Their effectiveness in bringing about consistent and significant reversal of airway obstruction remains a topic for debate. A review of the literature suggests that the majority of patients with cystic fibrosis have hyperresponsive and hyperactive airways and will respond favorably to bronchodilators, at least some of the time. Bronchial hyperresponsiveness tends to be greater in patients with advanced disease than in mildly affected ones. Responses to bronchodilators appear to be greatest when airway disease is mild-to-moderate, when there is a documented excessive bronchial hyperresponsiveness to nonspecific bronchoconstrictors (methacholine, histamine), and when the patients are young. The response to intravenous xanthine and terbutaline is best when patients experience an acute pulmonary exacerbation and when aerosolized bronchodilators are relatively ineffective. Patients with advanced airway destruction and obstruction have a high degree of airway wall instability, which may be worsened by inhaled bronchodilators. Adrenergic and parasympatholytic aerosols are equally effective; combining them in optimal doses may be more beneficial than using either alone. Atropine and ipratropium bromide may be more effective in adults than children, but this remains to be further evaluated. Some of the apparently poor responses to inhaled bronchodilators are likely due to inadequate dosing. In conclusion, most patients with cystic fibrosis are likely to benefit from bronchodilator therapy when given in adequate doses, appropriate combinations, and by the appropriate route.

Short-term and long-term effects of albuterol aerosol therapy in cystic fibrosis: a preliminary report

The effectiveness of maintenance albuterol aerosol therapy in cystic fibrosis (CF) was assessed by comparing spirometric measurements at the beginning and end of 1 year. Peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR) were measured twice daily to determine bronchodilator responsiveness and spontaneous diurnal variation (SDV), and results were compared with groups of normal and asthmatic children. CF patients not receiving regular albuterol therapy served as a control group. In the treatment group, forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) were significantly increased (12.2% and 18.4%, respectively) over the course of the treatment year, as contrasted with a significant decrease during the preceding year. During the study year the CF control group had a significant decrease in FEV1 and FEF25-75%, and the difference between treatment and control groups was significant for FVC, FEV1, and FEF25-75%. PEFR increased from the first to the last week of the year-long observation period (from 71.8% to 78.7% of predicted values, P < 0.01). Spontaneous diurnal variations were significantly greater in the CF study group than a group of normal children; SDV decreased significantly in the treatment group during the year of study. A bronchodilator response of > 15% was present in 25.8% of CF patient days, but there was considerable interpatient variability. Frequent bronchodilator responders were accurately predicted by their baseline bronchodilator responsiveness, but not by age or personal or family history of asthma or atopy. No difference in long-term pulmonary function improvements were noted between frequent and infrequent responders. The results suggest that maintenance albuterol aerosol treatments reversed the progressive downward course in lung function in the CF treatment group. A double-blind placebo-controlled study is required to confirm these preliminary findings.

The effect of high doses of inhaled salbutamol and ipratropium bromide in patients with stable cystic fibrosis

The effect of large doses of salbutamol (S) and ipratropium bromide (IB) were tested in a double-blind, randomized, crossover study. Nine patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), aged 12.8 +/- 2 years (mean +/- SE), were studied for 8 h on 2 separate days. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) included spirometry (FEV1), lung volumes (FRC), and airway resistance (Raw) measured by body plethysmography. Heart rate (HR) and oxygen saturation (SaO2) were measured before each test. On 1 day patients received S 200 micrograms, S 400 micrograms, and IB 80 micrograms, by inhalation at 45-min interval (sequence A). On the other day, the sequence was IB 80 micrograms, S 200 micrograms, and S 400 micrograms (sequence B). The PFTs were obtained at baseline, 45 min after each inhalation, and 4 and 8 h after baseline measurements. Baseline PFTs (mean +/- SE) were not significantly different on the 2 study days (FEV1, 1.48 +/- 0.1 vs 1.42 +/- 0.1 L; FRC, 2.77 +/- 0.6 vs 2.87 +/- 0.6 L; Raw, 4.04 +/- 0.2 vs 4.00 +/- 0.3 cm H2O/L/s). The FEV1 and Raw improved from baseline after each inhalation, and at 4 and 8 h during both days (p < 0.05). Forty-five minutes after S 200 micrograms, plus S 400 micrograms, FEV1, FRC, and Raw were not significantly different compared with the values 45 min after IB 80 micrograms, plus S 200 micrograms (1.67 +/- 0.1 vs 1.63 +/- 0.1 L; 2.81 +/- 0.6 vs 2.65 +/- 0.5 L; and 2.98 +/- 0.2 vs 2.66 +/- 0.1 cm H2O/L/s, respectively). The PFTs were not significantly different after maximal doses of IB (80 micrograms) compared with S (600 micrograms). The HR and SaO2 were not significantly different from baseline throughout the study period. These results indicate that both single and sequential therapy have a similar acute bronchodilator effect provided that large doses are used. We speculate that adrenergic and muscarinic pathways are equally important in airflow obstruction in patients with CF.

Increased physiological dead space during exercise after bronchodilation in cystic fibrosis

Bicycle ergospirometry was performed on 14 patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), for evaluating the effects of salbutamol and theophylline on the ventilatory response to exercise. After 1 week without bronchodilator therapy the patients cycled at 1/3 and 2/3 of their individual maximal working capacity (Wmax). The test was repeated three times after treatment with salbutamol, theophylline, or both drugs, respectively. After the combined therapy, physiological deadspace, ventilation, ventilatory equivalent of oxygen, and end-expiratory oxygen pressure increased significantly during steady state exercise at 1/3 Wmax. Similar, although not statistically significant changes, were observed after monotherapy with salbutamol or theophylline and during exercise at 2/3 Wmax. These effects could not be predicted by any lung function tests at rest or by the Shwachman-Kulczycki score. The results indicate that in some patients with CF bronchodilators can impair lung function during exercise. In conclusion, the effects of medication on exercise performance of patients with CF have to be considered. Especially, the use of bronchodilators requires a careful evaluation of their real benefit in each individual patient.

Response to inhaled bronchodilators and nonspecific airway hyperreactivity in children with cystic fibrosis

We tested the hypothesis that children with CF who have a significant response to bronchodilator (BD) would respond positively to standard methacholine (Mch) challenge. Our objective was to correlate the response to BD with the concentration that produced a 20% fall (PC20) in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). We studied 22 patients (12 males), aged 10.5 +/- 0.7 years (mean +/- SE), with a Shwachman-Kulczycki score 82 +/- 2.6 and baseline FEV1 of 80 +/- 4.5% predicted. Baseline expiratory flows, static lung volumes, and airway resistance were measured before and 30 min after inhaled salbutamol. On a separate day, within 2 weeks, a Mch challenge was given, with doubling concentrations from 0.03 to 8.0 mg/mL. A positive challenge was defined as a PC20 less than or equal to 2.0 mg/mL, and a positive response to BD as a greater than 6% of FEV1 increase. Mch challenge yielded 17 responders (R) with a PC20 of 0.5 +/- 0.1 mg/mL, and 5 nonresponders (NR) with a PC20 of 8.8 +/- 2.9 mg/mL. Baseline FEV1 was 77 +/- 5.3% predicted in R compared to 89 +/- 6.3% in NR (P = less than 0.001). History of springtime rhinitis was positive in 9/17 R and 2/5 NR. No significant correlation was found between baseline FEV1 and PC20, or between change in FEV1 post-BD and PC20. A greater than 6% increase in FEV1 was seen in 14/17 R (83% sensitivity) and in none of the 5 NR (100% specificity). In R, 8/17 patients had baseline FEV1 less than 80% predicted, compared to 1/5 in NR.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acute bronchodilator response to a combination of beta-adrenergic and anticholinergic agents in patients with cystic fibrosis

Patients with cystic fibrosis had a better acute bronchodilator response to albuterol and ipratropium bromide than to either drug alone. Further studies of long-term efficacy and safety seem justified.

Changes in airflow obstruction and oxygen saturation in response to exercise and bronchodilators in cystic fibrosis

The airway response to exercise and inhaled terbutaline was assessed in 25 patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), seeking evidence for the possible deleterious effects of bronchial muscle relaxation. We postulated that "early" and "late" flows, taken from the full maximum expiratory flow volume curve, might move paradoxically in patients with unstable airways. Oxygen saturation was measured continuously; desaturation occurred early in exercise with partial recovery thereafter. This was unrelated to changes in expiratory airflow measurements. Both during and after exercise, and after inhaled bronchodilator, changes in expiratory airflow measurements were strikingly variable. Changes in individual measurements should be interpreted in relationship to the within-subject variability of the test in patients with CF. During exercise, there was a significant increase in mean FEV1; this was most marked in patients with worst lung function. Two patients (both with severe lung disease) showed paradoxical changes in early and late flows. After exercise, only two patients showed the asthmatic pattern of postexercise bronchoconstriction. After inhaled bronchodilator, the group as a whole showed small but statistically significant increases in expiratory airflow measurements. Those with highest baseline FEV1 had the greatest bronchodilator response; this is the opposite of the pattern observed in asthma. Paradox did not occur after bronchodilators and only one patient showed a significant fall in late expiratory airflow. This pattern of expiratory airflow changes is compatible with the concept of airway instability in which any beneficial effects of bronchial tone reduction are canceled out by the effects of compression of damaged airways rendered more compliant by loss of bronchial wall tone. We did not observe any clinically important deleterious effects from this mechanism.

Longitudinal response of pulmonary function to bronchodilators in cystic fibrosis

Previous studies have found that between 0 and 95% of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) have a significant response to bronchodilators. These studies have been limited by small numbers and the measurement of response at one point in time. We analyzed the response to bronchodilators of patients with CF in a longitudinal and cross-sectional manner using pulmonary function data from 1980 to 1988. Overall, the proportion of patients with a positive response to bronchodilators was relatively large but not consistent over time. Of 573 tests in 127 persons, a positive response occurred in 68 tests of 51 patients. A negative response occurred in 19 tests of 17 patients. Only nine patients had a positive response in more than one third of their tests. The cross-sectional analysis showed variability similar to previous cross-sectional studies. Although a large proportion of patients with CF had a response to bronchodilators, the response was not consistent and may have been related to the number of tests performed. Continued longitudinal testing is necessary for valid decisions for bronchodilator use and for documenting the length, variability, and clinical significance of these responses.

The inhaled bronchodilators ipratropium bromide and metaproterenol in adults with CF

Ten patients with CF who were more than 18 years old, participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy of inhaled ipratropium bromide and metaproterenol as bronchodilators. The mean FEV1 of the group improved 17.1 percent after treatment with ipratropium bromide, 12.5 percent after metaproterenol treatment, and 16.6 percent after treatment with both of these medications together. There was no significant difference between these responses and patients who responded to one treatment tended to respond to the others. The side effects with these medications were minimal. When compared with patients in previous studies, our patients, who were much older as a group, demonstrated a greater degree of bronchodilation with ipratropium bromide and metaproterenol, as well as a greater degree of bronchoconstriction with placebo.

Bronchodilator therapy in cystic fibrosis: for better or worse?

As one approach to the management of the respiratory manifestations of cystic fibrosis, bronchodilators have been used to try to alleviate symptomatology. Several bronchodilators have been tested with varying degrees of success depending on the parameters measured, the method of patient selection for trials and the time of the study. In some instances the use of bronchodilators has proven detrimental to lung function. In general, it appears that bronchodilator therapy may be beneficial or hazardous and must be evaluated on an individual patient basis. Repeated assessments of respiratory function are necessary and the patient's management must be frequently re-evaluated.

Mechanisms of bronchial hyperreactivity in cystic fibrosis

We studied 14 patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) who had evidence of bronchial hyperreactivity on a standardized histamine challenge. Patients had a histamine challenge on the first day. Then they were pretreated with either 0.25 mg ipratropium bromide or 0.5 mg fenoterol hydrobromide on 2 separate days, and the histamine challenge was repeated. Baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 sec was similar on the 3 days; however, there was a small but significant (P less than 0.05) improvement after fenoterol. Mean PC20 on the control day was 1.50 mg/ml, which increased significantly after pretreatment with ipratropium (2.88 mg/ml, P less than 0.01) and fenoterol (3.64 mg/ml, P less than 0.005), indicating protection against histamine-induced bronchial hyperreactivity. The six CF patients with "coexistent asthma," as defined by recurrent episodes of wheezing responsive clinically to bronchodilator therapy, had no significant protection from ipratropium, whereas the eight "nonasthmatic" CF patients were protected by both ipratropium and fenoterol. We postulate that at least two mechanisms contribute to histamine-induced bronchial hyperreactivity in patients with CF, one related to vagally mediated reflex bronchoconstriction and another that acts independently of this mechanism.

Airway obstruction and airway wall instability in cystic fibrosis: the isolated and combined effect of theophylline and sympathomimetics

Multiple aspects of lung function were measured in 17 cystic fibrosis (CF) patients on four occasions: without therapy (0); with oral theophylline medication (Th); after inhalation of salbutamol (beta 2); and with combined medication (Th + beta 2). In addition to routine measurements, partial and maximum expiratory flow-volume (MEFV) curves were superimposed, and the flow transient equivalent of the MEFV curve was determined. Its volume dimension (volume of airway contribution, VACMEFV) partially reflects airway distensibility. Changes in airway compressibility--the other consequence of airway wall instability--were assessed by observing changes in end-expiratory flow rate. Airway resistance, expired volumes, and early expired flow rates, as well as VACMEFV improved significantly after beta 2 medication. Mean end-expiratory flow also increased after beta 2; in two patients, however, it decreased significantly, indicating that enhanced airway compression dominated over the release of bronchospasm. The alone had only minor effects on lung function. Early expired volume and flow rates as well as VACMEFV showed no significant difference between beta 2 alone and Th + beta 2; airway resistance even decreased significantly with this drug combination. End-expiratory flow rate, however, was significantly lower after Th + beta 2 than after beta 2 alone. Although theophylline does not alter lung function in most patients with CF, sympathomimetics relieve bronchospasm in many, but they enhance airway compressibility and thereby decrease peripheral expiratory airflow in some.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Exercise response and rehabilitation in cystic fibrosis

Exercise testing can be performed safely in cystic fibrosis patients, and provides a simple and reproducible index of overall health in the disease. A wide variability in exercise capacity of cystic fibrosis patients is found, but, in general, exercise is limited by the degree of lung disease and, to a lesser extent, by compromised nutritional status. Based on the results of exercise tests, patients can then be supplied with individualised exercise prescriptions. Exercise training can be expected to improve the exercise capacity of the majority of cystic fibrosis patients, but pulmonary function generally remains unchanged. Whether exercise rehabilitation will improve the long term prognosis for patients with cystic fibrosis is currently not known.

Cold air provocation of airway hyperreactivity in patients with cystic fibrosis

Thirty-four patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) were assessed for baseline pulmonary functions before, and 5 and 15 minutes after cold air challenge (CACh). Most of the patients had no change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and maximum expiratory flow at 25% vital capacity (Vmax25%VC) post-CACh. Five patients responded with reduced FEV1 and 13 with reduced Vmax25%VC. However, paradoxical increases were noted in 10 patients for FEV1 and in 5 for Vmax25%VC. Paradoxical responses were most frequent in patients with severe lung disease. The explanation for this variability may lie in the varying degrees of airway instability and volume of airway contribution (VAC) to early flows, resulting from the damage caused by chronic infection. Conventional challenges may be useless in determining the true incidence of bronchial hyperreactivity in patients with CF.