Comparative nasal effects of bradykinin and histamine: influence on nasal airways resistance and plasma protein exudation

Treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: a review of the role of topical levocabastine

Lcocabastine is an extremely potent and highly selective H(1)-receptor antagonist which has been specifically developed as eye drops and nasal spray for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Clinical experience to date suggests that this topical antihistamine is at least as effective as other current first-line therapeutic approaches for the treatment of this condition, including oral H(1)-receptor antagonists and sodium cromoglycate. Onset of action is rapid, with clinical effects apparent within minutes of instillation. Moreover, duration of action is sufficiently long to permit a convenient twice-daily dosing regimen. Topical levocabastine is well tolerated with an adverse-effect profile comparable with that of placebo and sodium cromoglycate. As might be expected from the route of drug administration, application site reactions are the most frequent adverse effect associated with levocabastine eye drops and nasal spray with an incidence comparable with that seen in placebotreated controls. The availability of effective and well-tolerated topical antihistamines, such as levocabastine, is an important advance which broadens the range of therapeutic approaches available for the clinical management of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Levocabastine appears to be an attractive alternative to oral antihistamines as a first-line therapeutic option for the treatment of this atopic condition.

The effect of allergic rhinitis on the degree of stress, fatigue and quality of life in OSA patients

Both allergic rhinitis (AR) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are known to increase stress and fatigue, but the result of their coexistence has not been studied. The objective of this study was to evaluate the amount of stress and fatigue when AR is combined with OSA. One hundred and twelve patients diagnosed with OSA by polysomnography were enrolled. Among them, 37 patients were diagnosed with AR by a skin prick test and symptoms (OSA-AR group) and 75 patients were classified into the OSA group since they tested negative for allergies. We evaluated the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), stress score, fatigue score, ability to cope with stress, and rhinosinusitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ) with questionnaires and statistically compared the scores of both groups. There were no significant differences in BMI and sleep parameters such as LSAT, AHI, and RERA between the two groups. However, the OSA-AR group showed a significantly higher ESS score compared to the OSA group (13.7 ± 4.7 vs. 9.3 ± 4.8). Fatigue scores were also significantly higher in the OSA-AR group than in the OSA group (39.8 ± 11.0 vs. 30.6 ± 5.4). The OSA-AR group had a significantly higher stress score (60.4 ± 18.6 vs. 51.2 ± 10.4). The ability to cope with stress was higher in the OSA group, although this difference was not statistically significant. RQLQ scores were higher in the OSA-AR group (60.2 ± 16.7 compared to 25.1 ± 13.9). In conclusion, management of allergic rhinitis is very important in treating OSA patients in order to eliminate stress and fatigue and to minimize daytime sleepiness and quality of life.

New topics in bradykinin research

Bradykinin has been implicated to contribute to allergic inflammation and the pathogenesis of allergic conditions. It binds to endothelial B(1) and B(2) receptors and exerts potent pharmacological and physiological effects, notably, decreased blood pressure, increased vascular permeability and the promotion of classical symptoms of inflammation such as vasodilation, hyperthermia, oedema and pain. Towards potential clinical benefit, bradykinin has also been shown to exert potent antithrombogenic, antiproliferative and antifibrogenic effects. The development of pharmacologically active substances, such as bradykinin receptor blockers, opens up new therapeutic options that require further research into bradykinin. This review presents current understanding surrounding the role of bradykinin in nonallergic angioedema and other conditions seen by allergists and emergency physicians, and its potential role as a therapeutic target.

The importance of rhinitis on sleep, daytime somnolence, productivity and fatigue

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of treatment of allergic rhinitis should include improvement of daytime and nighttime symptoms, sleep, and quality of life. Congestion from allergic rhinitis is associated with decreased learning and productivity at work and school and a reduced quality of life. The release of inflammatory mediators and activation of inflammatory cells results in nasal congestion, causing disrupted sleep and subsequent daytime somnolence.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review presents evidence that allergic rhinitis causes sleep disruption, and discusses the pathophysiology of this process. The medications used to treat allergic rhinitis and their ability to improve sleep in patients with allergic rhinitis are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Some allergic rhinitis medications can be sedating; therefore, it is important to treat allergic rhinitis with medications that improve symptoms while producing few adverse effects. Medications such as the second-generation antihistamines and anticholinergic drugs are well tolerated, but have little effect on congestion. Intranasal corticosteroids reduce congestion, improve sleep and sleep problems, and reduce daytime sleepiness, fatigue, and inflammation. Recently, montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, has been added to the therapies approved for allergic rhinitis. Montelukast significantly improves both daytime and nighttime symptoms.

Pathophysiology of nasal obstruction and meta-analysis of early and late effects of levocetirizine

Nasal obstruction, also referred to as congestion, blockage or stuffiness, is a crucial symptom in allergic rhinitis (AR) and may affect sleep as well as quality of life. Early- and late-phase-allergic reactions both contribute to nasal obstruction, although it primarily represents a major symptom in the chronic allergic reaction. A complex network of inflammatory and neurogenic phenomena relates to chronic nasal obstruction, including the subepithelial accumulation of inflammatory cells, particularly mast cells and eosinophils, and the release of neuropeptides. Nasal obstruction is a difficult-to-treat symptom. Vasoconstrictors (decongestants) and intranasal corticosteroids, due to their anti-inflammatory properties, have mainly been used for relieving the nasal passages from the congested mucosa. However, there is accumulating evidence recently that the latest-generation potent antihistamines have decongestant properties in AR. This paper aims to review the pathophysiologic background of nasal obstruction and the evidence for an antihistamine, levocetirizine, in relieving nasal congestion. A meta-analysis on the early and late effects of levocetirizine on nasal obstruction under artificial and natural allergen exposure conditions is presented, demonstrating convincingly that levocetirizine shows a consistent effect on nasal obstruction as early as over the first 2 h and sustained over 6 weeks.

Histamine receptors that influence blockage of the normal human nasal airway

1. The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanisms by which histamine causes nasal blockage. Histamine, 40-800 microg, intranasally into each nostril, induced significant blockage of the nasal airway in normal human subjects, as measured by acoustic rhinometry. 2. Oral pretreatment with cetirizine, 5-30 mg, the H1 antagonist, failed to reverse completely the nasal blockage induced by histamine, 400 microg. 3. Dimaprit, 50-200 microg, the H2 agonist, intranasally, caused nasal blockage, which was reversed by oral pretreatment with ranitidine, 75 mg, the H2 antagonist. 4. A combination of cetirizine, 20 mg, and ranitidine, 75 mg, caused greater inhibition of the nasal blockage caused by histamine, 400 microg, than cetirizine alone. In the presence of both antagonists, there was residual histamine-induced nasal blockage. 5. R-alpha-methylhistamine (R-alpha-MeH), 100-600 microg, the H3 agonist, intranasally, caused nasal blockage, which was not inhibited by either cetirizine or ranitidine. 6. Thioperamide, 700 microg, the H3 antagonist, intranasally, reversed the R-alpha-MeH-induced nasal blockage. Thioperamide alone had no significant action on the nasal blockage induced by histamine, 400 and 1000 microg, but, in the presence of cetirizine, 20 mg, thioperamide further reduced the histamine-induced nasal blockage. 7. Corynanthine, 2 mg, the alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist, administered intranasally, caused nasal blockage. 8. Corynanthine produced a greater increase in nasal blockage when in combination with bradykinin compared to its combination with R-alpha-MeH. 9. There appears to be a contribution of H1, H2 and H3 receptors to histamine-induced nasal blockage in normal human subjects. The sympathetic nervous system actively maintains nasal patency and we suggest that activation of nasal H3 receptors may downregulate sympathetic activity.

Influences of allergic rhinitis on sleep

BACKGROUND

Allergic rhinitis is classically characterized by sneezing, pruritus, rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion. These symptoms can lead to impaired nocturnal sleep, and this impairment results in daytime fatigue and somnolence, reducing both learning and work efficiency and decreasing quality of life.

STUDY DESIGN

In addition, the mediators of AR, including histamine, leukotrienes, cytokines, and prostaglandins, may play a role in sleep regulation and, thus, may be directly involved in this impairment independent of nasal obstruction. Recumbency and/or diurnal variation augments turbinate swelling, causing nasal blockage during nocturnal sleep. Medications directed toward reversal of nasal congestion often concomitantly work through suppression of inflammatory mediators and constitute the primary therapy for sleep disturbance associated with allergic rhinitis. Some pharmaceutical interventions that reduce nasal congestion have adverse effects on sleep. Decongestants effectively reduce nasal congestion but frequently produce stimulatory effects and even insomnia. Antihistamines reduce sneezing and pruritus, but are less effective in relieving congestion. Earlier, "first-generation" antihistamines are associated with significant sedation. They also have anticholinergic properties, which can cause dry mouth and make mouth breathing even more uncomfortable in the allergic individual with nasal obstruction. The absence of anticholinergic properties in second-generation, largely nonsedating antihistamines limits their efficacy in rhinorrhea. Azelastine, a topical antihistamine, significantly reduces rhinorrhea and congestion and improves subjective sleep quality, but is also associated with increased sedation. Intranasal corticosteroids and oral leukotriene receptor antagonists effectively reduce rhinorrhea, congestion, and inflammatory mediators.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of these medications at improving subjective sleep quality has been established through multiple randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials.

Nebulised salbutamol administered during sputum induction improves bronchoprotection in patients with asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhalation of hypertonic or even isotonic saline during sputum induction may cause bronchospasm in susceptible patients with asthma, despite premedication with 400 microg inhaled salbutamol delivered by pressurised metered dose inhaler (pMDI). The bronchoprotection afforded by additional inhaled salbutamol administered through the ultrasonic nebuliser during sputum induction was investigated.

METHODS

Twenty patients with moderate to severe asthma underwent sputum induction by inhaling saline 4.5% (or 0.9% if post-bronchodilation forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) <65% predicted) for 10 minutes according to two protocols given 1 week apart in random order. At visit A the patients received 400 microg salbutamol administered through a pMDI+spacer 20 minutes before induction while at visit B the premedication was supplemented by 1500 microg nebulised salbutamol inhaled throughout the induction procedure. Both the investigator and the patients were blind to the nebulised solution used. FEV1 was recorded during sputum induction at 1, 3, 5, and 10 minutes. Sputum cell counts and histamine, tryptase and albumin levels in the supernatants were determined.

RESULTS

The mean (SE) maximal reduction in FEV1 over the 10 minute period of sputum induction was 11.7 (2.8)% at visit A, which was significantly greater than at visit B (2.6 (1.2)%; mean difference 9% (95% CI 2.7 to 15.4), p<0.01). Total and differential sputum cell counts as well as albumin, tryptase, and histamine levels did not differ between the two visits.

CONCLUSION

The addition of inhaled salbutamol through an ultrasonic nebuliser markedly improves bronchoprotection against saline induced bronchoconstriction in patients with moderate to severe asthma undergoing sputum induction without affecting cell counts and inflammatory markers.

Minimal persistent inflammation, an emerging concept in the nature and treatment of allergic rhinitis: the possible role of leukotrienes

OBJECTIVE

To review the emerging concept of minimal persistent inflammation in allergic rhinitis and its implications for therapy.

DATA SOURCES

Relevant clinical studies in the English language were reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION

Material was taken from academic/scholarly journals.

RESULTS

Accumulating evidence suggests that allergic rhinitis is a chronic inflammatory disease instead of a disease of acute symptoms. An approach to the therapy for allergic rhinitis should consider that even when symptoms are absent, a minimal level of persistent inflammation may persist. To prevent unexpected exacerbations, the treatment strategy may need to include managing subclinical persistent inflammation. Therapeutic options addressing the major inflammatory elements in allergic rhinitis, including eosinophils, the cysteinyl leukotrienes, and histamine, must be evaluated as management strategies that can achieve effective control. Traditional medications include intranasal corticosteroids, antihistamines, and immunotherapy. Recently, a leukotriene receptor antagonist has been approved for major rhinitis symptoms (congestion, rhinorrhea, sneezing, and pruritus), suggesting a new option for the treatment of allergic rhinitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the possible presence of a minimal persistent inflammation during rhinitis patients' asymptomatic periods, it is important to consider a prophylactic approach to treating allergic rhinitis to prevent or reduce exacerbations during an acute increase in allergen. In light of the advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of allergic rhinitis, agents must be considered based on their safety, efficacy, and ability to deal with underlying inflammation as well as symptom relief.

Allergic Rhinitis: Broader Disease Effects and Implications for Management

Allergic rhinitis is a burdensome disease for a significant part of the population in both adults and children. Poorly controlled allergic rhinitis can trigger exacerbations of asthma, sinusitis, and otitis media, diseases with which it shares common pathophysiologic elements. Consequently, early diagnosis and treatment should be a priority for patients and physicians, not only to control the symptoms of allergic rhinitis but also to improve the management of associated diseases. Several pharmacologic therapies can be considered in an armamentarium that includes antihistamines (intranasal and systemic), intranasal cromolyn, intranasal anticholinergic agents, intranasal steroids, systemic steroids, immunotherapy, and, most recently, leukotriene receptor antagonists. Often, combinations of these treatments are used to maximize control of refractory symptoms.

Canine model of nasal congestion and allergic rhinitis

The ragweed- and histamine-induced decreases in nasal patency in cohorts of ragweed-sensitized and nonsensitized dogs were assessed. The volume of nasal airways (V(NA)) was assessed by acoustic rhinometry and resistance to airflow (R(NA)) by anterior rhinomanometry. Histamine delivered to the nasal passages of five dogs caused a rapid and prolonged increase in R(NA) (0.75 +/- 0.26 to 3.56 +/- 0.50 cmH(2)O. l(-1). min), an effect that was reversed by intranasal delivery of aerosolized phenylephrine. Ragweed challenge in five ragweed-sensitized dogs increased R(NA) from 0.16 +/- 0.02 to 0.53 +/- 0.07 cmH(2)O. l(-1). min and decreased V(NA) from 12.5 +/- 1.9 to 3.9 +/- 0.3 cm(3), whereas administration of saline aerosol neither increased R(NA) nor decreased V(NA). Prior administration of d-pseudoephedrine (30 mg po) attenuated the ragweed-induced increase in R(NA) and decrease in V(NA). Ragweed challenge changed neither R(NA) nor V(NA) in four nonsensitized dogs. Mediator-induced nasal congestion and allergen-induced allergic rhinitis in ragweed-sensitized dogs, which exhibit symptoms similar to human disease, can be used in the evaluation of safety and efficacy of antiallergic activity of potential drugs.

Bronchial eosinophilic infiltration in Crohn's disease in the absence of pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Immunological and functional bronchopulmonary abnormalities may be present in up to two-thirds of patients with Crohn's disease. Having recently described a mild increase in methacholine airways responsiveness in these patients, we investigated whether this physiological abnormality is associated with bronchial inflammation since it has previously been described in asthma.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with Crohn's disease and 15 healthy controls matched for age, atopy and smoking habit, were studied. All the subjects underwent a bronchial methacholine challenge (1, 4 and 16 mg/mL) and a sputum induction by inhalation of hypertonic saline (NaCl 4.5%). The sputum samples were analysed for their cellular composition as well as for the levels of several mediators and proteins in the fluid phase, including eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), myeloperoxydase, albumin, alpha2-macroglobulin, interleukin-8 (IL-8), IgA and IL-8/immunoglobulin A complexes.

RESULTS

When compared to control subjects, patients with Crohn's disease had significantly higher sputum eosinophil counts (14.5% [0-79.9%] vs 0.2% [0-2.3%]; P < 0. 001) and ECP levels (26.2 microg/L [4-124.2 microg/L] vs 9.8 microg/L [0-94.2 microg/L]; P < 0.05). However, patients with Crohn's disease had no sign of increased plasma exudation as reflected by sputum levels of albumin and alpha2-macroglobulin similar to those seen in control subjects. Furthermore the sputum levels of IL-8, IgA and IL-8/IgA complexes were not significantly different between the two groups. The magnitude of the fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s after methacholine inhalation was significantly increased in Crohn's disease patients although it did not correlate with the extent of sputum eosinophilia or with the sputum ECP levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Crohn's disease patients without any clinical respiratory involvement have airway eosinophilia without local increased plasma exudation. However, bronchial eosinophilia in Crohn's disease per se is not sufficient to induce clinically significant airway hyperresponsiveness, suggesting that other factors than bronchial eosinophilic infiltration are required for the clinical expression of an airway instability.

Clinical manifestations of the release of histamine and other inflammatory mediators

This article reviews the symptoms that are characteristic of the early- and late-phase allergic reaction. Each of the cardinal symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis (sneezing, pruritus, rhinorrhea, congestion) is discussed, as is the role of various chemical mediators in the expression of these clinical manifestations.

Adenosine A2B receptors: a novel therapeutic target in asthma?

Adenosine is an endogenous nucleoside that modulates many physiological processes. Its actions are mediated by interaction with specific cell membrane receptors. Four subtypes of adenosine receptor have been cloned: A1, A2A, A2B and A3. Significant advancement has been made in our understanding of the molecular pharmacology and physiological relevance of adenosine receptors but our knowledge of A2B receptors lags behind that of other receptor types. Only recently have potentially important functions been discovered for the A2B receptors, prompting a renewed interest in this receptor type. A2B receptors have been implicated in the regulation of vascular smooth muscle tone, cell growth, intestinal function and neurosecretion. In this review, Igor Feoktistov, Riccardo Polosa, Stephen Holgate and Italo Biaggioni focus on the role of A2B receptors in mast cell activation and the potential relevance of this action on asthma.