Comparison of fluticasone propionate and beclomethasone dipropionate on direct and indirect measurements of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with stable asthma

Different medications for seasonal allergic rhinitis in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

While the efficacy of medications such as fluticasone furoate (FF), fluticasone propionate (FP), and azelastine-fluticasone (AF) has been substantiated in comparison to their respective placebo controls, uncertainties persist regarding the comparative effectiveness of different intranasal agents.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of FP, FF, and AF in the treatment of adult patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) using a meta-analytic approach.

METHODS

A computer search was conducted in Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE databases to identify randomized controlled trials assessing the effectiveness and safety of FF, FP, and AF in treating SAR. Data on treatment safety and efficacy were extracted and analyzed through meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 20 studies were included, comprising 10590 participants. The results of the direct meta-analysis indicated that, compared to placebo, both relative Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) and relative Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS) significantly decreased post-intervention [mean difference (MD) = -1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.73 to -1.22; MD = -0.66, 95%CI: -0.82 to -0.49], with similar findings observed across the FF, FP, and AF subgroups. The network meta-analysis results showed that for improving rTNSS and rTOSS, the SUCRA values ranking from highest to lowest were AF, FP, FF, and placebo. Improvements in rTNSS and rTOSS with FP, FF, and AF were all significantly greater than those observed with placebo, with AF demonstrating superior efficacy compared to both FP and FF. No statistically significant difference in rTNSS improvement was found between FP and FF, although FP exhibited significantly greater improvement in rTOSS compared to FF.

CONCLUSION

In adult patients with SAR, the combination of azelastine and fluticasone shows a significant effect in improving nasal and ocular symptoms, with FP demonstrating marked improvement in ocular symptoms compared to FF.

Efficacy and safety of inhaled corticosteroids relative to fluticasone propionate: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials in asthma

INTRODUCTION

Many trials have been published comparing inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatments in asthma. However, mixed results necessitate the summarization of available evidence to aid in decision-making. Areas covered: This systematic review evaluated randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy and safety of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) with other ICS including beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), budesonide (BUD) and ciclesonide (CIC). PubMed was searched and 54 RCTs that fit pre-determined criteria were included. Endpoints evaluated included lung function, asthma symptom control, exacerbation frequency, reliever use, quality of life and steroid-related side effects. Expert commentary: Across all studies, FP was associated with either more favorable or at least similar efficacy and safety, in comparison with BDP or BUD. This observation may be related to FP's higher relative potency and almost negligible oral bioavailability. FP was comparable to CIC for efficacy. However, CIC appeared to have a smaller impact on cortisol levels than FP, which is likely due to CIC's incomplete conversion to active metabolite (des-CIC) and the lower potency of des-CIC compared with FP. Although there were no significant differences in evaluated outcomes after treatment with different ICS in the majority of studies, some observed differences could be explained by their respective pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties.

Patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials of inhaled asthma medications: systematic review and research needs

PURPOSE

To assess the diversity, application, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in asthma clinical trials.

METHODS

We critically appraised the use of asthma-specific PROs in 87 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of inhaled asthma medications published during 1985-2006.

RESULTS

A total of 79 RCTs reported PROs, of which 78 (99%) assessed symptom scores and seven (9%) assessed asthma quality of life scores. Only eight (10%) used validated instruments and five (6%) provided clinical interpretation of scores. Due to heterogeneity in the reporting of symptom measures, it is not possible to determine how many discrete symptom assessment instruments have been used. Only 26 (33%) of the RCTs that measured symptom scores reported the scores for follow-up. Limited improvement occurred over time: fewer than 30% of the RCTs used validated PRO measures in any individual year.

CONCLUSION

Numerous validated PRO instruments are available but it is unclear why few are used in asthma clinical trials. Problems include poor reporting, and uncritical analysis and interpretation of PRO scores. Research needs include identifying and recommending a set of PROs for use in asthma clinical research and providing guidance for researchers on the application, analysis and interpretation of PRO measures in clinical trials.

Impact of inhaled corticosteroids on cortisol suppression in adults with asthma: a quantitative review

BACKGROUND

Studies examining the effects of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) on cortisol suppression show inconsistent results, and there is uncertainty regarding the dose-response relationship between ICSs and cortisol suppression.

OBJECTIVE

To determine, using meta-analysis, the extent of cortisol suppression after administration of clinically relevant ICS doses in adults with asthma.

METHODS

Database searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library) using appropriate indexed terms were performed to identify eligible articles for review. Articles reporting the effects of ICSs on cortisol levels in asthmatic adults, measured using the cumulative serum or plasma cortisol, morning serum or plasma cortisol, or cumulative overnight urinary free cortisol method, were identified. All available cortisol measurements were extracted. Cortisol suppression was estimated, and treatment arms were grouped into low-, medium-, and high-dose ranges according to the Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines. A multivariate model was used to determine relationships between ICS dose and cortisol suppression and to explore sources of heterogeneity among trials.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies providing information on 216 measures of cortisol suppression were included in this meta-analysis. Cortisol suppression in the low-, medium-, and high-dose groups were estimated to be 17.92% (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.08%-24.77%), 26.55% (95% CI, 17.29%-35.80%), and 36.31% (95% CI, 26.48%-46.13%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Statistically significant cortisol suppression was evident at low doses of ICSs and increased with dose. These results support an impact of all ICSs on endogenous cortisol levels and underscore the importance of titrating ICS doses to the minimum required to maintain symptom control.

Fluticasone versus beclomethasone or budesonide for chronic asthma in adults and children

BACKGROUND

Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and budesonide (BUD) are commonly prescribed inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of asthma. Fluticasone propionate (FP) is newer agent with greater potency in in-vitro assays.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of Fluticasone to Beclomethasone or Budesonide in the treatment of chronic asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group trial register (January 2007) and reference lists of articles. We contacted trialists and pharmaceutical companies for additional studies and searched abstracts of major respiratory society meetings (1997 to 2006).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in children and adults comparing Fluticasone to either Beclomethasone or Budesonide in the treatment of chronic asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality. One reviewer extracted data. Quantitative analyses were undertaken using RevMan analyses 1.0.1.

MAIN RESULTS

Seventy-one studies (14,602 participants) representing 74 randomised comparisons met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality was fair. Dose ratio 1:2: FP produced a significantly greater end of treatment FEV1 (0.04 litres (95% CI 0 to 0.07 litres), end of treatment and change in morning PEF, but not change in FEV1 or evening PEF. This applied to all drug doses, age groups, and delivery devices. No difference between FP and BDP/BUD were seen for trial withdrawals. FP led to fewer symptoms and less rescue medication use. When given at half the dose of BDP/BUD, FP led to a greater likelihood of pharyngitis. There was no difference in the likelihood of oral candidiasis. Plasma cortisol and 24 hour urinary cortisol was measured frequently but data presentation was limited. Dose ratio 1:1: FP produced a statistically significant difference in morning PEF, evening PEF, and FEV1 over BDP or BUD. The effects on exacerbations were mixed. There were no significant differences incidence of hoarseness, pharyngitis, candidiasis, or cough.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Fluticasone given at half the daily dose of beclomethasone or budesonide leads to small improvements in measures of airway calibre, but it appears to have a higher risk of causing sore throat and when given at the same daily dose leads to increased hoarseness. There are concerns about adrenal suppression with Fluticasone given to children at doses greater than 400 mcg/day, but the randomised trials included in this review did not provide sufficient data to address this issue.

Effect of inhalation of single dose of beclomethasone on airway epithelium

Inhaled corticosteroids are being recommended for the treatment of bronchial asthma for their anti-inflammatory properties and reduction of airway hyperreactivity. The first tissue coming to the contact with all inhaled substances is the airway epithelium. In this experiment, the immediate effect of a single MDI dose of beclomethasone on the ultrastructure of the tracheal and bronchiolar epithelium was studied. Due to the beclomethasone administration, the secretory elements were highly affected. The tracheal goblet cells were damaged, mucus release was significantly accelerated, and the mechanism of secretion was influenced. The bronchiolar Clara cells revealed signs of the pathological alteration. Their secretory granules were usually stored in the cytoplasm. Occasionally, degenerating Clara cells were found after the beclomethasone administration. The injury of ciliated cells in both locations was only mild and this fact was reflected in slight impairment of the tracheal ciliary border. As a morphological sign of impaired self-cleaning ability, inspissated secretion was discovered among cilia. According to this evaluation, the inhalation of the single dose of beclomethasone caused a moderate damage to the tracheal epithelium and a mild one to the epithelium of terminal bronchioles. The results draw attention to the adverse effects of otherwise therapeutically beneficial inhaled glucocorticosteroids.

Once-daily administration of fluticasone propionate does not worsen controlled airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled steroids are currently the most important drugs for asthma patients, but compliance tends to be low. Compliance could be improved by reducing the number of daily administrations.

OBJECTIVES

In the present study, we compared once- and twice-daily administration of fluticasone propionate (FP) to determine the differences in efficacy.

METHODS

Subjects were 40 patients diagnosed with bronchial asthma with stable symptoms and pulmonary functions who were on twice-daily FP administration of 100 microg. There were 14 men and 26 women ranging from 29 to 72 years of age. After a 4-week observation period, subjects were randomized into two administration groups by the envelope method and followed for 8 weeks: group A, once-daily administration (200 microg of FP at night), and group B, twice-daily administration (100 microg of FP in the morning and at night). Clinical symptoms, pulmonary functions and airway responsiveness were compared between these two groups.

RESULTS

No significant deterioration in clinical symptoms, pulmonary functions and airway responsiveness were observed in group A compared with group B.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that once-daily FP administration is as effective as twice-daily administration, and that it may improve the compliance for inhaled steroids.

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness and the development of asthma and COPD in asymptomatic individuals: SAPALDIA cohort study

BACKGROUND

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) is a common feature of asthma. However, BHR is also present in asymptomatic individuals and its clinical and prognostic significance is unclear. We hypothesised that BHR might play a role in the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as well as asthma.

METHODS

In 1991 respiratory symptoms and BHR to methacholine were evaluated in 7126 of the 9651 participants in the SAPALDIA cohort study. Eleven years later 5825 of these participants were re-evaluated, of whom 4852 performed spirometric tests. COPD was defined as an FEV1/FVC ratio of <0.70.

RESULTS

In 1991 17% of participants had BHR, of whom 51% were asymptomatic. Eleven years later the prevalence of asthma, wheeze, and shortness of breath in formerly asymptomatic subjects with or without BHR was, respectively, 5.7% v 2.0%, 8.3% v 3.4%, and 19.1% v 11.9% (all p<0.001). Similar differences were observed for chronic cough (5.9% v 2.3%; p = 0.002) and COPD (37.9% v 14.3%; p<0.001). BHR conferred an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 2.9 (95% CI 1.8 to 4.5) for wheezing at follow up among asymptomatic participants. The adjusted OR for COPD was 4.5 (95% CI 3.3 to 6.0). Silent BHR was associated with a significantly accelerated decline in FEV1 by 12 (5-18), 11 (5-16), and 4 (2-8) ml/year in current smokers, former smokers and never smokers, respectively, at SAPALDIA 2.

CONCLUSIONS

BHR is a risk factor for an accelerated decline in FEV1 and the development of asthma and COPD, irrespective of atopic status. Current smokers with BHR have a particularly high loss of FEV1.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of inhaled beclometasone dipropionate delivered via hydrofluoroalkane-containing devices

Inhaled corticosteroids have a key role in the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In recent times, beclometasone dipropionate has been reformulated in pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDIs), using hydrofluoroalkanes (HFAs) as a propellant. Extensive toxicological testing has shown that HFA-propellants are well tolerated. Among the reformulated beclometasone dipropionate-containing pMDIs, only the characteristics of the two Qvar formulations have been thoroughly explored. Compared to the reference beclometasone dipropionate formulation, the mass median aerodynamic diameter of the Qvar formulations are substantially smaller (1.1 vs 4.0 microm), whereas that of Modulite averages 2.6 microm. Scintigraphic and pharmacokinetic studies indicate a higher lung deposition for both the Qvar and the Beclazone formulations, compared with reference beclometasone dipropionate formulation. Since the 2- to 3-fold increase in pulmonary deposition results in a 2.6- to 3-fold difference in relative efficacy for Qvar, half the dose of the reference beclometasone dipropionate formulation has been currently recommended in adult patients with asthma, a recommendation that is supported by a large number of clinical trials. Conversely, the design of the studies conducted to compare the efficacy of Qvar with fluticasone propionate and budesonide does not allow establishing their equivalence on a milligram per milligram basis. Good studies on the bioequivalence between the reference beclometasone dipropionate formulation and the Modulite or Beclazone formulations are not available.

Beclomethasone dipropionate attenuates airways hyperresponsiveness to neurokinin A and histamine in asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the most effective anti-inflammatory agents available for the treatment of asthma but they produce only modest effects on airway inflammation and non-specific bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). However, little is known about the possibility that treatment with ICS might cause additional protection on BHR to inhaled tachykinins such as neurokinin A (NKA).

OBJECTIVE

Therefore, we compared the effects of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) on the degree of BHR to inhaled histamine and NKA in a double-blind, controlled, cross-over study of asthmatic patients.

METHODS

Patients attended the laboratory before and after each 6 weeks treatment period to undertake concentration-response studies with histamine and NKA. Bronchial responsiveness to both funs was expressed as the provocative concentration producing a 20% decrease in FEV(1) from baseline (PC(20)).

RESULTS

BDP therapy attenuated the constrictor response to both agonists to a similar degree, their geometric mean (range) PC(20) values increasing from 0.47 (0.21-1.41) mg/ml to 2.43 (0.51-4.50) mg/ml (P<0.01, post-salb vs. post-BDP treatment) and from 101.7 (27.3-356.1) microg/ml to 666.7 (151.5-1,000) microg/ml (P<0.01, post-salb vs. post-BDP treatment) for histamine and NKA, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Airway responsiveness to histamine and NKA is reduced by BDP to the same extent. As a result of these findings, provocation with NKA is unlikely to provide additional useful information in the assessment of airway inflammation in asthma.

Inhaled fluticasone versus inhaled beclomethasone or inhaled budesonide for chronic asthma in adults and children

BACKGROUND

Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and budesonide (BUD) are commonly prescribed inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of asthma. Fluticasone propionate (FP) is newer agent with greater potency in in-vitro assays.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of Fluticasone to Beclomethasone or Budesonide in the treatment of chronic asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group trial register (January 2004) and reference lists of articles. We contacted trialists and pharmaceutical companies for additional studies and searched abstracts of major respiratory society meetings (1997 to 2003).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in children and adults comparing Fluticasone to either Beclomethasone or Budesonide in the treatment of chronic asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality. One reviewer extracted data. Quantitative analyses were undertaken using RevMan analyses 1.0.1.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty six studies (12, 119 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality was variable. Dose ratio 1:2: FP produced a significantly greater FEV1 (0.14 litres, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.06 to 0.22), morning PEF (11.10 L/min, 95%CI 3.12 to 19.09 L/min) and evening PEF (9.31 L/min, 95%CI 5.12 to 13.5 L/min). This applied to all drug doses, age groups, and delivery devices. No difference between FP and BDP/BUD were seen for trial withdrawals. Symptoms and rescue medication use were widely reported but few trials provided sufficient data for analysis. When given at half the dose of BDP/BUD, FP led to a greater likelihood of pharyngitis. There was no difference in the likelihood of oral candidiasis. Plasma cortisol and 24 hour urinary cortisol was measured frequently but data presentation was limited. Dose ratio 1:1: FP produced a statistically significant difference in am PEF (9.58 L/min (95% CI 5.20 to 13.97)), pm PEF (7.41 L/min (95% CI 2.61 to 12.22)), and FEV1 (0.09 L (0.02 to 0.17)). The effects on exacerbations were mixed. There was an increase in the incidence of hoarseness, but no significant difference in pharyngitis, candidiasis, or cough.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Fluticasone given at half the daily dose of beclomethasone or budesonide leads to small improvements in measures of airway calibre, but it appears to have a higher risk of causing hoarseness when given at the same daily dose. Future studies should attempt to establish the relative efficacy of inhaled steroids delivered with CFC-free propellants.

Effects of inhaled corticosteroids, leukotriene receptor antagonists, or both, plus long-acting beta2-agonists on asthma pathophysiology: a review of the evidence

Chronic inflammation and smooth muscle dysfunction are consistent features of asthma, and are responsible for disease progression and airway remodelling. The development of chronic airway inflammation depends upon the recruitment and activation of inflammatory cells and the subsequent release of inflammatory mediators, including cytokines. Cellular and histological evaluation of drugs with anti-inflammatory activity, such as inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), is achieved by analysing samples of lung tissue or biological fluids, obtained by techniques such as bronchial biopsy, bronchoalveolar lavage and sputum induction. These provide valuable information on the inflammatory processes occurring in the lung, although not all are equal in value. The beneficial effects of ICSs in asthma treatment are a consequence of their potent and broad anti-inflammatory properties. Furthermore, there have been promising results indicating that ICSs can reverse some of the structural changes that contribute to airway remodelling. Long-acting beta2-agonists (LABAs) added to ICSs provide greater clinical efficacy than ICSs alone, suggesting the possibility of complementary activity on the pathophysiological mechanisms of asthma: inflammation and smooth muscle dysfunction. Leukotrienes play a part in the pathogenesis of asthma. Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) directly inhibit bronchoconstriction and may have some anti-inflammatory effects, although the extent to which inhibiting one set of inflammatory mediators attenuates the inflammatory response is questionable. In concert with their effect on a broad variety of inflammatory mediators and cells, treatment with ICSs (including ICSs and LABAs) results in superior control of the pathophysiology of asthma and superior clinical efficacy as assessed by the greater improvements in pulmonary function and overall control of asthma compared with LTRAs.

Time course of action of two inhaled corticosteroids, fluticasone propionate and budesonide

BACKGROUND

It is important to be able to compare the efficacy and systemic effects of inhaled corticosteroids but their slow onset of action makes it difficult to measure the maximum response to a given dose. Submaximal responses could be compared if the time course of action of the inhaled corticosteroids being compared was similar. We have compared the time course of action of fluticasone and budesonide, measuring response as change in the provocative dose of adenosine monophosphate causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (PD20AMP).

METHODS

Eighteen subjects with mild asthma, aged 18-65, took part in a three way randomised crossover study. Subjects took fluticasone (1500 microg/day), budesonide (1600 microg/day), and placebo each for 4 weeks with a washout period of at least 2 weeks between treatments; PD20AMP and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) were measured during and after treatment. The time taken to achieve 50% of the maximum response (T50%) was compared as a measure of onset of action.

RESULTS

There was a progressive increase in PD20AMP during the 4 weeks of treatment with both fluticasone and budesonide but not placebo; the increase after 1 and 4 weeks was 2.28 and 4.50 doubling doses (DD) for fluticasone and 2.49 and 3.65 DD for budesonide. T50% was 9.3 days for fluticasone and 7.5 days for budesonide with a median difference between fluticasone and budesonide of 0.1 days (95% CI -1.4 to 2.65). There was a wide range of response to both inhaled corticosteroids but good correlation between the response to fluticasone and budesonide within subjects. FEV1 and morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) increased during the first week of both active treatments and were stable thereafter. There was a small progressive improvement in nocturnal symptoms with both active treatments.

CONCLUSION

PD20AMP was a more sensitive marker of response to inhaled corticosteroid therapy than FEV1 and PEFR. The time course of action of fluticasone and budesonide on PD20AMP is similar, suggesting that comparative studies of their efficacy using 1 or 2 week treatment periods are valid. When a new inhaled corticosteroid becomes available, a pilot study comparing its time course of action with that of an established corticosteroid should allow comparative studies to be performed more efficiently.

Adrenal function as assessed by low-dose adrenocorticotropin hormone test before and after switching from inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate to inhaled fluticasone propionate

Low-dose adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH) tests (0.5 microg/L 73 m2) were done before and after switching from inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate to inhaled fluticasone propionate in 12 patients 33-77 years old who had mild-to-severe asthma to compare the effects of these drugs on adrenal function. Low-dose ACTH tests were performed after the subjects had received inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (200-900 microg/day) for at least 12 wk. Treatment was then switched to inhaled fluticasone propionate (200-600 microg/day) for at least 12 wk, and a second low-dose ACTH test was done. Pulmonary function was assessed on the basis of peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR, % of predicted value). After switching treatment, the daily dose of inhaled corticosteroid decreased by about 40%. Basal serum cortisol and ACTH levels were similar with both treatments. The adrenal response, as assessed by incremental rise in the serum cortisol level (peak minus basal) after ACTH challenge, improved significantly (5.6-7.9 microg/dL, p < 0.01) after switching to fluticasone. All three patients who had lower serum cortisol levels during beclomethasone treatment than during fluticasone treatment showed improvement in both the peak cortisol level and the incremental rise in cortisol. Mean morning and evening PEFRs significantly increased after switching from beclomethasone to fluticasone (morning: 71.2 to 76.0%, p < 0.01; evening: 67.3 to 72.1%, both p < 0.05). The diurnal variation of PEFR significantly decreased from 10.9% to 8.3% after switching treatment (p < 0.01). We conclude that switching from beclomethasone to fluticasone reduces the risk of adrenal dysfunction associated with inhaled steroids and improves pulmonary function.

Dose response of inhaled corticosteroids on bronchial hyperresponsiveness: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is a relatively steep dose-response curve for effects of inhaled corticosteroids on conventional airway markers of asthmatic disease control.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether a dose-response effect exists for bronchial hyperresponsiveness.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials in asthmatic patients was performed using a computerized systematic review of databases. Doubling dose/dilution protection of inhaled corticosteroid was compared with placebo. Studies which used direct (methacholine and histamine) and indirect (adenosine monophosphate) bronchial challenge stimuli were eligible for inclusion.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies fulfilled eligibility criteria (963 patients). Values for doubling dose/dilution protection categorized by low/medium dose (< 1,000 microg) and high dose (> or = 1,000 microg) of inhaled corticosteroid amounted to a 1.25 (95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.42) and 2.16 (95% confidence interval 1.88 to 2.44) shift, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

High doses of inhaled corticosteroids conferred greater improvements in bronchial hyperresponsiveness than low doses.

Fluticasone propionate via the Diskhaler or hydrofluoroalkane-134a metered-dose inhaler on methacholine-induced airway hyperresponsiveness

STUDY OBJECTIVE

s: To compare the effect of 4 weeks of treatment with fluticasone propionate (FP), 100 micro g bid, delivered either via the Diskhaler (GlaxoSmithKline; Middlesex, UK) or a hydrofluoroalkane (HFA)-134a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) on airway responsiveness.

DESIGN

A single-center, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled crossover study.

SETTING

Outpatients.

PATIENTS

Patients with mild asthma who had not received corticosteroids for 4 weeks prior to the study.

INTERVENTIONS

FP, 100 micro g bid, via the Diskhaler, HFA-134a pMDI, or placebo for periods of 4 weeks.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

The primary efficacy variable was the provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) (PD(20)) at the end of each 4-week treatment period. The FP formulations were defined as equivalent if the treatment difference was within +/- 1 doubling dose of methacholine. Forty-seven patients were included in the per-protocol population. The baseline PD(20) geometric mean was 0.21 mg, which increased to 0.55 mg with FP via the HFA-134a pMDI and to 0.68 mg with FP via the Diskhaler. The treatment difference between adjusted means was - 0.16 doubling doses (95% confidence interval, - 0.62 to 0.31 doubling doses; p = 0.503). Both significantly decreased airway responsiveness compared to placebo (p < 0.001), and also significantly increased lung function with no difference between the two active groups. FP was well tolerated with few adverse events and no effect on serum cortisol levels.

CONCLUSIONS

FP delivered via the HFA-134a pMDI is equivalent to FP via the Diskhaler in reducing airway responsiveness.

A comparison of the efficacy and safety of a half dose of fluticasone propionate with beclamethasone dipropionate and budesonide in childhood asthma

This study was carried out in an attempt to compare the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (FP) at the half dose of budesonide (BUD) and beclamethasone dipropionate (BD) in childhood asthma. Ninety-six children with moderate to severe asthma (9.6 +/- 2.17 years) whose asthma was already controlled on BUD (n = 52) or BD (n = 44) were recruited into the study. In the first part of the study (the first 12 weeks) each group was followed with three weekly lung function measurements, daily diary records, and peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements on the initial medication. At the end of 6 weeks, drugs were switched to a half dose of FP, and the subjects were followed for another 6 weeks. Blood samples were obtained for osteocalcin and plasma cortisol levels after each treatment period. In the second part of the study, 50 patients continued to take FP at the half dose of BUD or BD for another 30 weeks. Clinic visits, including lung function and PEF measurements, were conducted every 10 weeks. After 6 weeks of FP treatment, there was a small but statistically significant decrease in FEV1 and FEF(25-75) in both groups (BUD and BD) without any significant obstruction. These mild changes in lung function measurements continued during long-term follow-up. However, there was no statistically significant further decrease in any lung function parameters while receiving FP (visits 3-8) (coefficient = -0.00751 L/day, p = 0.39 for FEF(25-75) and coefficient = -0.00910 L/sec/day, p = 0.055 for FEV1). There were no significant changes in the morning and evening PEF measurements and diurnal PEF variations after 6 weeks of treatment with FP compared with BUD and BD treatments. There were no significant changes in basal cortisol and osteocalcin levels before or after 6 weeks of FP treatment (p > 0.05). The present study concluded that, although FP at the half dose of BUD or BD seems to maintain reasonable control of the disease symptoms, a mild but significant and persistent decrease in lung function parameters may indicate that FP may not be twice as potent as BUD or BD in childhood asthma by evaluation of lung functions. This conclusion must be further verified with long-term studies.

Therapeutic ratio of inhaled corticosteroids in adult asthma. A dose-range comparison between fluticasone propionate and budesonide, measuring their effect on bronchial hyperresponsiveness and adrenal cortex function

Inhaled corticosteroids have become the mainstay treatment of bronchial asthma. However, simultaneous evaluations of efficacy and side effects are few. This study aimed to compare the relative effect of fluticasone propionate (FP) and budesonide (BUD) on bronchial responsiveness and endogenous cortisol secretion in adults with asthma. The study was double-blind and included 66 adults with asthma, who were randomized to FP (n = 33) or BUD (n = 33). Prestudy, all participants were clinically stable, using inhaled corticosteroids and hyperresponsive to methacholine. Eligible patients were randomized to three consecutive 2-wk periods with either FP 250 microg twice daily, FP 500 microg twice daily, and FP 1,000 microg twice daily, or BUD 400 microg twice daily, BUD 800 microg twice daily, and BUD 1,600 microg twice daily, delivered by Diskhaler and Turbuhaler, respectively. Before randomization and at the end of each treatment, bronchial methacholine PD(20), 24-h urinary cortisol excretion (24-h UC), plasma cortisol, serum osteocalcin, and blood eosinophils were determined. The relative PD(20) potency between FP and BUD was 2.51 (95% CI, 1.05-5.99; p < 0. 05), while the relative 24-h UC potency was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.44-0.83; p < 0.01). The differential therapeutic ratio (FP/BUD) based on PD(20) potency and 24-h UC was 4.18 (95% CI, 1.16-15.03; p < 0.05). The difference in systemic potency was also seen for plasma cortisol, serum osteocalcin, and blood eosinophils. Therapeutic ratio over a wide dose range, determined by impact on bronchial responsiveness and endogenous corticosteroid production, seems to favor FP.

Efficacy and safety of a novel beclomethasone dipropionate dry powder inhaler (Clickhaler) for the treatment of adult asthma. Amsterdam Clinical Study Group

A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy protocol was used to compare the safety and efficacy of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) delivered by a novel dry powder inhaler (DPI, Clickhaler) or by a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (MDI) plus spacer. There was a four-week run-in period, completed by 240 adult patients, who received BDP via an MDI. Patients with stable asthma were then randomized into a 12-week treatment period and received BDP (< or =2 mg/day via DPI or MDI). There were no significant differences in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) (primary endpoint), evening PEF, overall daytime or nighttime symptom scores, or lung function parameters (forced expiratory volume in 1 sec, forced vital capacity) between DPI and MDI. The safety profiles were similar and patient acceptability for Clickhaler was high. In conclusion, BDP administered via Clickhaler was found to be clinically equivalent to an optimally used MDI. Patients with stable asthma currently receiving BDP via MDI may be effectively switched to treatment via Clickhaler DPI.

Effects of 2 weeks of treatment with fluticasone propionate 100 mcg b.d. by comparison with zafirlukast 20 mg b.d. on bronchial hyper-responsiveness in patients with mild to moderate asthma

This study was designed to compare the effects of low-dose inhaled fluticasone propionate (100 mcg twice daily) with those of the leukotriene antagonist, zafirlukast (20 mg twice daily), on bronchial hyper-responsiveness. The study recruited 30 patients (nine men, 21 women; mean age 45 years) with forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) > 50% and airway reversibility to salbutamol > or =15%. This was a single centre, double-blind, double-dummy cross-over study, composed of two successive 2-week treatment periods, each preceded by a 2-4 week single-blind placebo period. Following 2 weeks of treatment with fluticasone propionate and zafirlukast, the mean provocational concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) histamine was 1.61 mg ml(-1) (SD 2.34) and 0.99 mg ml(-1) (SD 1.74) respectively. Taking baseline differences into account, the difference between treatments was equivalent to 0.77 doubling doses of histamine (95% CI, 0.05-1.50; P=0.037). Morning peak flow values were significantly higher (17 l min(-1); P=0.049) after treatment with fluticasone propionate during the second week of treatment. Both treatments were well tolerated. The results of this short-term study show that compared with zafirlukast, a low dose of fluticasone propionate offers greater clinical benefit and is more cost effective.

Airway inflammation in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with special emphasis on the antigen-presenting dendritic cell: influence of treatment with fluticasone propionate

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the airways characterized by variable airflow limitation and airway hyperresponsiveness. The type of inflammatory response in asthma is compatible with a major contribution of professional antigen-presenting cells. The airways in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are also markedly inflamed; however, the predominant types of inflammatory cells and the main anatomical site of the lesion appear to differ from those in asthma. COPD is characterized by reduced maximum expiratory flow and slow forced emptying of the lungs. Steroids are the most prominent medication used in the treatment of asthma and COPD; however, the beneficial effect of steroid treatment in COPD is subject of debate. We investigated the efficacy of fluticasone propionate (FP) treatment in atopic asthmatics and in COPD patients with bronchial hyperreactivity who smoke. The effect of the treatment on bronchial hyperreactivity and indices of the methacholine dose-response curve were analysed, as well as indices of inflammation of the airway mucosa with special emphasis on the antigen presenting dendritic cell. Treatment of allergic asthmatic patients resulted in improvement of lung function (FEV1), a decrease in bronchial hyperresponsiveness and a decrease of maximal airway narrowing. During the FP-treatment of COPD patients, FEV1 remained stable, while FEV1 deteriorated significantly in the placebo group. Therefore, steroid treatment may have a beneficial effect in COPD patients with bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). Since immunohistochemical analysis of bronchial biopsy specimens from asthma and COPD patients show disease-specific aspects of inflammation, the anti-inflammatory effect of FP is obtained through modulation of different cell populations in asthma and COPD.

A comparison of multiple doses of fluticasone propionate and beclomethasone dipropionate in subjects with persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids are recommended for the treatment of persistent asthma. Comparative clinical studies evaluating 2 or more doses of these agents are few.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of fluticasone propionate (88 micrograms twice daily and 220 micrograms twice daily) with 2 doses of beclomethasone dipropionate (168 micrograms twice daily and 336 micrograms twice daily) in subjects with persistent asthma.

METHODS

Three hundred ninety-nine subjects participated in this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial. Eligible subjects were using daily inhaled corticosteroids and had an FEV1 of 45% to 80% of predicted value. Clinic visits, including spirometry, were conducted every 1 to 2 weeks. Subjects recorded symptoms, use of albuterol, and peak expiratory flows on daily diary cards.

RESULTS

Fluticasone propionate treatment resulted in significantly (P </=.034) greater improvements in objective pulmonary function parameters than did beclomethasone dipropionate treatment and significantly greater reductions in daily albuterol use (P </=.010) and asthma symptoms (P </=.027). Both low-dose (88 micrograms twice daily) and medium-dose (220 micrograms twice daily) fluticasone propionate significantly increased FEV1 compared with higher doses of beclomethasone dipropionate (P =. 006). Low-dose and medium-dose fluticasone propionate improved FEV1 by 0.31 L (14%) and 0.36 L (15%), respectively, compared with improvements of 0.18 L (8%) and 0.21 L (9%) with low-dose and medium-dose beclomethasone dipropionate. The adverse event profiles were similar for both medications.

CONCLUSION

Fluticasone propionate provides greater asthma control at roughly half the dose of beclomethasone dipropionate, with a comparable adverse event profile.

Effects of fluticasone propionate and beclomethasone dipropionate on parameters of inflammation in peripheral blood of patients with asthma

Bronchial inflammation plays a central role in asthma. We investigated whether parameters of inflammation were increased in peripheral blood. Furthermore, we tested whether fluticasone propionate (FP), a new inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), and beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) affected these parameters. FP 750 microg/day and BDP 1500 microg/day were compared in a randomized, crossover study consisting of two 6-week treatment periods, each preceded by a 3-week placebo period. Twenty-one patients with symptomatic asthma completed the study. The results were compared with those of six normal subjects (controls). Immunophenotyping of inflammatory cells was performed in whole blood, and serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) was measured. With regard to clinical efficacy, ICS increased PC20 histamine by more than 1.9 doubling doses and FEV1 by more than 0.34 l. The number of CD3/HLA-DR+ lymphocytes was significantly increased in asthmatics compared to the normal subjects, both after placebo (P<0.01) and after therapy (P<0.05). The CD3/HLA-DR+ lymphocytes decreased significantly after treatment with FP (P<0.05). Serum ECP was elevated in patients without ICS and decreased after treatment with BDP (P<0.001). In conclusion, the number of CD3/HLA-DR+ lymphocytes and serum ECP levels were raised in the peripheral blood of symptomatic asthmatics, and decreased by clinically effective doses of ICS. In this respect, FP 750 microg/day was at least as effective as BDP 1500 microg/day.

Dose-response of inhaled drugs in asthma. An update

The demographic characteristics of patients used in clinical trials (such as the severity of airway obstruction) can significantly influence the results of dose-response studies, emphasising the need to evaluate effects on the steep part of the dose-response curve. Differences in inhaler devices can also influence study outcomes, as for inhaled drugs both airway efficacy and adverse effect profiles are primarily determined by lung deposition and hence bioavailability. Dose-response studies with short- and long-acting beta 2-agonists show an excellent therapeutic ratio at conventional doses used in everyday clinical practice (i.e. 2 to 4 puffs). Dose-related systemic effects of beta 2-agonist occur at higher doses, for salbutamol (albuterol) > 500 micrograms. Fenoterol is a beta 2-agonists with higher intrinsic activity than salbutamol and produces greater systemic effects at higher than conventional doses on a microgram equivalent basis, although even at 4000 micrograms such differences are unlikely to be clinically relevant. No differences between fenoterol and salbutamol have been shown in terms of bronchodilator potency on a microgram equivalent basis. The long-acting beta 2-agonist salmeterol, as a partial agonist, has the potential to attenuate the acute bronchodilator response to a higher activity beta 2-agonist such as salbutamol or fenoterol, although there is no evidence to date on whether this is relevant in the setting of acute asthma. When comparing inhaled corticosteroids, attention should be focused on their respective risk-benefit ratios for antiasthmatic versus systemic activity. In terms of detecting systemic activity, it is important to use sensitive measures, such as urinary cortisol excretion, rather than insensitive parameters, such as a single morning plasma cortisol measurement between 0800h and 1000h. For fluticasone, a greater in vitro potency results in only marginal differences in antiasthmatic efficacy, particularly on the flatter part of the dose-response curve above 1000 micrograms/day in adults and 400 micrograms/day in children. However, the same enhanced potency translates directly into commensurate differences in systemic adverse effects on the steep part of the systemic dose-response curve above 1000 micrograms/day in adults and 400 micrograms/day in children, respectively. Furthermore, with repeated twice-daily administration, a longer elimination half-life and prolonged systemic tissue retention due to enhanced lipophilicity will result in greater systemic activity observed at steady-state in long term administration studies. This dissociation of airway and systemic dose-response curves results in a J-shaped curve for benefit: risk ratio, with a watershed area above 1000 microgram/day in adults. This fall in the benefit: risk ratio is likely to be greater for fluticasone than for budesonide or beclomethasone. Further studies are needed to clearly define the dose-response relationships of higher potency steroids such as fluticasone, particularly on the steep part of the curve (for clinical efficacy), using the appropriate back-titration design along with sensitive measures of antiasthmatic and systemic activity.