Comparison between parameters from maximal cycle ergometer test first without respiratory gas analysis and thereafter with respiratory gas analysis among healthy prepubertal children

Mask Use for Athletes: A Systematic Review of Safety and Performance Outcomes

CONTEXT

With the current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations for mask use to minimize transmission of coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) coupled with concern for future pandemics that would require mask wearing, providing data-driven guidance with respect to athletic performance is essential.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of existing literature on the use of face masks while exercising to assess the physiologic effects of face masks worn during athletic activities.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review was conducted of studies on face mask use during exercise according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Potential studies were identified through searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL and CINAHL databases.

STUDY SELECTION

Screening was completed independently by 2 coauthors who sought to identify studies that described the effects of oronasal mask use, if any, on sports/exercise/physical activity, for any age, gender, or level of sport. Articles describing mask effects without exercise, articles published before 1980, and non-English language studies were excluded.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data extraction focused on physiologic parameters measured during physical activity performed while wearing a face mask.

RESULTS

Twenty-two articles met all inclusion criteria. Study analysis revealed that the use of masks in healthy volunteers during exercise had no significant effect on physiologic parameters measured including heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), oxygen saturation, and perceived exertion. Of the studies that investigated N95 masks in the healthy adult population, 2 reported modest changes in RR and maximum power output indicative of decreased athletic performance when subjects were exercising at maximum effort. Similar findings were seen in studies of subpopulations including children and pregnant women.

CONCLUSION

Available data suggest that healthy individuals can perform moderate-to-vigorous exercise while wearing a face mask without experiencing changes in HR, RR, and oxygen saturation that would compromise individual safety or athletic performance. In the specific situation in which an N95 mask is worn, maximum power generated may be impaired.

WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT THE SUBJECT

To date, there has been no systematic review of the existing literature to provide a clear consensus on whether face mask use significantly impacts athletic performance. Mask use has been demonstrated safe in the workplace; however, the use of face masks during exercise has not been examined on a large scale, particularly with respect to physiologic parameters.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE

This analysis highlights that available data suggest that healthy individuals can perform heavy exercise in face masks with minimal physiologic changes. This is the first systematic review of studies analyzing exercise use wearing masks. With the evidence presented here commonly cited concerns about both safety and performance decrements with mask use during physical activities may be allayed.

Bicycle spiroergometry: comparison of standardized examination protocols for adolescents: is it necessary to define own standard values for each protocol?

Purpose

To compare performance data of adolescents collected with five different bicycle spiroergometry protocols and to assess the necessity for establishing standard values for each protocol.

Methods

One-hundred-twenty adolescents completed two bicycle spiroergometries within 14 days. One of the two tests was performed based on our institutional weight-adapted protocol (P0). The other test was performed based on one out of four exercise protocols widely used for children and adolescents (P1, 2, 3 or 4) with 30 persons each. The two tests were performed in a random order. Routine parameters of cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPET) such as VO₂peak, maximum power, O₂ pulse, OUES, VE/VCO₂ slope as well as ventilatory and lactate thresholds were investigated. Agreement between protocols was evaluated by Bland–Altman analysis, coefficients of variation (CV) and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC).

Results

None of the CPET parameters were significantly different between P0 and P1, 2, 3 or 4. For most of the parameters, low biases between P0 and P1–P4 were found and 95% confidence intervalls were narrow. CV and ICC values largely corresponded to well-defined analytical goals (CV < 10% and ICC > 0.9). Only maximal power (Pmax) showed differences in size and drift of the bias depending on the length of the step duration of the protocols.

Conclusion

Comparability between examination protocols has been shown for CPET parameters independent on step duration. Protocol-dependent standard values do not appear to be necessary. Only Pmax is dependent on the step duration, but in most cases, this has no significant influence on the fitness assessment.