1
|
Rahnama S, Ghehsareh Ardestani E, Ebrahimi A, Nikookhah F. Seed priming with plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) improves growth and water stress tolerance of Secale montanum. Heliyon 2023; 9:e15498. [PMID: 37151636 PMCID: PMC10161722 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Abiotic and biotic stresses are major global threats to food security in the 21st century. Application of plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) in rangeland plants is the only possible alternative that supports plant growth and development to combat environmental stress and successfully restoring rangelands. PGPBs were also found to be a potential substitute for chemical fertilizers and pesticides. The challenge is to determine which biofertilizers can be used for Secale montanum in normal and under water stress conditions. We sought to determine the benefits of PGPB for S. montanum under water stress conditions in terms of seedling growth traits, growth indicators, and nutrient uptake in the research greenhouse. Therefore, a completely randomized factorial design was conducted with two treatments of PGPB inoculation, including the control (no PGPB inoculation), PGPBs Bacillus cereus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Azospirillum lipoferm, and Azotobacter chroococcum, and water stress in the research greenhouse. Overall, the results of the current study showed that water stress greatly reduced the above-ground fresh weight of above-ground plant parts and the nitrogen and potassium content of S. montanum. The present study confirms the positive effects of PGPB on fresh and dry weights of above- and below-ground parts and seedling, vigor index, quality index, and nitrogen and potassium content of S. montanum, except for below-ground parts length, compared with the controls, which shows that PGPB usually improves some indicators of plant growth and development. We suggest that restoration of S. montanum seed inoculation with PGPB should be supported in degraded rangelands and marginal drylands in low rainfall years, which may cause water scarcity and consequently water stress in arid and semi-arid regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiva Rahnama
- Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, 8818634141, Iran
| | - Elham Ghehsareh Ardestani
- Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, 8818634141, Iran
- Central Laboratory, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
- Corresponding author. Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, 8818634141, Iran.
| | - Ataollah Ebrahimi
- Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, 8818634141, Iran
| | - Farzaneh Nikookhah
- Department of Fishery Science, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, 8818634141, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li JT, Lu JL, Wang HY, Fang Z, Wang XJ, Feng SW, Wang Z, Yuan T, Zhang SC, Ou SN, Yang XD, Wu ZH, Du XD, Tang LY, Liao B, Shu WS, Jia P, Liang JL. A comprehensive synthesis unveils the mysteries of phosphate-solubilizing microbes. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2021; 96:2771-2793. [PMID: 34288351 PMCID: PMC9291587 DOI: 10.1111/brv.12779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Phosphate-solubilizing microbes (PSMs) drive the biogeochemical cycling of phosphorus (P) and hold promise for sustainable agriculture. However, their global distribution, overall diversity and application potential remain unknown. Here, we present the first synthesis of their biogeography, diversity and utility, employing data from 399 papers published between 1981 and 2017, the results of a nationwide field survey in China consisting of 367 soil samples, and a genetic analysis of 12986 genome-sequenced prokaryotic strains. We show that at continental to global scales, the population density of PSMs in environmental samples is correlated with total P rather than pH. Remarkably, positive relationships exist between the population density of soil PSMs and available P, nitrate-nitrogen and dissolved organic carbon in soil, reflecting functional couplings between PSMs and microbes driving biogeochemical cycles of nitrogen and carbon. More than 2704 strains affiliated with at least nine archaeal, 88 fungal and 336 bacterial species were reported as PSMs. Only 2.59% of these strains have been tested for their efficiencies in improving crop growth or yield under field conditions, providing evidence that PSMs are more likely to exert positive effects on wheat growing in alkaline P-deficient soils. Our systematic genetic analysis reveals five promising PSM genera deserving much more attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-Tian Li
- Institute of Ecological Science, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity and Biomonitoring, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Plant Development, School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, PR China.,School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, PR China
| | - Jing-Li Lu
- Institute of Ecological Science, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity and Biomonitoring, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Plant Development, School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, PR China
| | - Hong-Yu Wang
- Institute of Ecological Science, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity and Biomonitoring, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Plant Development, School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, PR China
| | - Zhou Fang
- Institute of Ecological Science, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity and Biomonitoring, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Plant Development, School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, PR China
| | - Xiao-Juan Wang
- Institute of Ecological Science, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity and Biomonitoring, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Plant Development, School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, PR China
| | - Shi-Wei Feng
- Institute of Ecological Science, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity and Biomonitoring, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Plant Development, School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, PR China
| | - Zhang Wang
- Institute of Ecological Science, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity and Biomonitoring, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Plant Development, School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, PR China
| | - Ting Yuan
- School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, PR China
| | - Sheng-Chang Zhang
- School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, PR China
| | - Shu-Ning Ou
- Institute of Ecological Science, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity and Biomonitoring, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Plant Development, School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, PR China
| | - Xiao-Dan Yang
- Institute of Ecological Science, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity and Biomonitoring, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Plant Development, School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, PR China
| | - Zhuo-Hui Wu
- Institute of Ecological Science, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity and Biomonitoring, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Plant Development, School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, PR China
| | - Xiang-Deng Du
- School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, PR China
| | - Ling-Yun Tang
- School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, PR China
| | - Bin Liao
- School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, PR China
| | - Wen-Sheng Shu
- Institute of Ecological Science, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity and Biomonitoring, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Plant Development, School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, PR China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Chemical Pollution, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510006, PR China
| | - Pu Jia
- Institute of Ecological Science, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity and Biomonitoring, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Plant Development, School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, PR China
| | - Jie-Liang Liang
- Institute of Ecological Science, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity and Biomonitoring, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Plant Development, School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, PR China
| |
Collapse
|