No change in dopamine D1 receptor in vivo binding in rats after sub-chronic haloperidol treatment

Dyskinesia in multiple system atrophy and progressive supranuclear palsy

In the differential diagnosis of Parkinson syndromes, the response to L-Dopa is an essential criterion for the diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's syndrome (IPS), and the presence of L-Dopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) is considered a supportive criterion. This implies that in the presence of LID an atypical Parkinson-syndrome (APS) is unlikely. However, dyskinesia, and in particular LID, can also be present in APS such as MSA and PSP, although less frequently, and with varying clinical appearance. We conclude that whilst presence of dyskinesia provides support for a diagnosis of IPD, they do not allow reliable differentiation from APS.

Decreased binding of [11C]NNC112 and [11C]SCH23390 in patients with chronic schizophrenia

AIMS

Abnormality of cognitive function in schizophrenia has been suggested to be related to dopamine D1 receptor. However, the results of previous positron emission tomography (PET) studies of dopamine D1 receptor in schizophrenia were not consistent.

MAIN METHODS

In this study, six patients with schizophrenia in severe residual phase with chronic antipsychotic treatment and twelve healthy age-matched controls participated. Two different radioligands, [11C]NNC112 and [11C]SCH23390, for dopamine D1 receptor were used on the same subjects. Binding of the ligands was measured by PET, and statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of covariate (ANCOVA) with age as covariate.

KEY FINDINGS

Good correlations between binding potential values (BP(ND)) and age were observed in all regions of interest (ROIs) with both ligands. ANCOVA with age as covariate of BP(ND) values of all ROIs revealed that the patient group showed significantly lower BP(ND) value compared with the control group in both ligands.

SIGNIFICANCE

In patients with chronic schizophrenia in severe residual phase with chronic antipsychotic treatment, the binding potential values of both ligands were significantly lower in the striatum and cortical regions than those of healthy controls.

The impact of antipsychotic drugs on food intake and body weight and on leptin levels in blood and hypothalamic ob-r leptin receptor expression in wistar rats

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to investigate the impact of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs on leptin concentration in blood and changes in the receptor expression in the hypothalamus of male Wistar rats.

METHODS

From the age of 13 to 18 weeks, three groups of 20 animals were fed an average dose of 3.5 + 0.03 mg/ kg body weight (BW) haloperidol; 30.6 + 0.22 mg/kg BW clozapine; or 14.9 + 0.13 mg/kg BW ziprasidone in ground food pellets containing 15% fat. Twenty control animals received no drugs. Blood samples were taken at week 14, 16, and 19. Locomotor activity and exploratory behavior were measured using the alcove test at weeks 15 and 17. The expression of the hypothalamic leptin receptor in rat brains was determined by using a Western blot.

RESULTS

Rats medicated with haloperidol and ziprasidone showed a significantly decreased percentage weight gain and food consumption. We observed no differences in the alcove test, but locomotor activity was significantly reduced in the haloperidol group. Except for rats in the clozapine and ziprasidone groups, after 2 weeks of drug application, we found no changes in the leptin blood concentrations among the four groups or animals within each group. Moreover, we did not find specific differences in hypothalamic leptin receptor expression among the groups.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that in male Wistar rats during this treatment period, the tested drugs did not act directly on the leptin regulatory system. We recommend further studies using long-term treatment of different rat strains.

Effects of dopamine antagonists on the timing of two intervals

Rats were trained on a two-interval (12 and 36 s) temporal production task (the peak procedure). Test sessions were conducted in which either the D(1) antagonist SCH-23390 (SCH; 0.02, 0.04, 0.06 mg/kg) or the D(2) antagonist haloperidol (HAL; 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 mg/kg) were injected prior to testing. Both drugs affected the amount of responding, but only HAL affected timing. Under HAL, both intervals were overestimated, consistent with a HAL-induced decrease in clock speed. Drug-induced decreases in response output were more profound for the long interval than the short. In addition, there was evidence of HAL- and SCH-induced delays in response initiation that were more severe for the long interval, perhaps owing to its status as a weaker conditioned stimulus.