Cilostazol attenuates ventricular arrhythmia induction and improves defibrillation efficacy in swine

Progress Analysis of Personalized Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease Undergoing Interventional Therapy

Coronary atherosclerosis (or coronary heart disease [CHD]) is a common cardiovascular disease that seriously damages human health. Percutaneous coronary stent implantation represents the primary treatment option for severe CHD in clinical practice; meanwhile, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is widely used to reduce the risk of postoperative thrombosis. Although the mechanisms of action of the two most commonly used antiplatelet drugs, aspirin and clopidogrel, remain unclear, clinical studies have shown that some patients are susceptible to stent thrombosis-antiplatelet resistance (high on-treatment platelet reactivity [HTPR])-despite using these drugs. Therefore, screening for HTPR and formulating personalized antiplatelet therapies is necessary. Ticagrelor, indobufen, and rivaroxaban are the most common and safe antiplatelet drugs used in clinical practice, with broad application prospects. This review summarizes the mechanisms of action of existing antiplatelet drugs, reasons for personalized treatment, screening of antiplatelet reactions, and development of novel antiplatelet drugs.

Update on Cilostazol: A Critical Review of Its Antithrombotic and Cardiovascular Actions and Its Clinical Applications

Cilostazol, a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor, has vasodilating and antiplatelet properties with a low rate of bleeding complications. It has been used over the past 25 years for improving intermittent claudication in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Cilostazol also has demonstrated efficacy in patients undergoing percutaneous revascularization procedures for both PAD and coronary artery disease. In addition to its antithrombotic and vasodilating actions, cilostazol also inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation via phosphodiesterase III inhibition, thus mitigating restenosis. Accumulated evidence has shown that cilostazol, due to its "pleiotropic" effects, is a useful, albeit underutilized, agent for both coronary artery disease and PAD. It is also potentially useful after ischemic stroke and is an alternative in those who are allergic or intolerant to classical antithrombotic agents (eg, aspirin or clopidogrel). These issues are herein reviewed together with the pharmacology and pharmacodynamics of cilostazol. Large studies and meta-analyses are presented and evaluated. Current guidelines are also discussed, and the spectrum of cilostazol's actions and therapeutic applications are illustrated.

J-wave syndromes: Brugada and early repolarization syndromes

A prominent J wave is encountered in a number of life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia syndromes, including the Brugada syndrome and early repolarization syndromes. Brugada syndrome and early repolarization syndromes differ with respect to the magnitude and lead location of abnormal J waves and are thought to represent a continuous spectrum of phenotypic expression termed J-wave syndromes. Despite two decades of intensive research, risk stratification and the approach to therapy of these 2 inherited cardiac arrhythmia syndromes are still undergoing rapid evolution. Our objective in this review is to provide an integrated synopsis of the clinical characteristics, risk stratifiers, and molecular, ionic, cellular, and genetic mechanisms underlying these 2 fascinating syndromes that have captured the interest and attention of the cardiology community in recent years.

Phosphodiesterase-3 inhibitor (cilostazol) attenuates oxidative stress-induced mitochondrial dysfunction in the heart

Background

Cilostazol is a type 3 phosphodiesterase inhibitor which has been previously demonstrated to prevent the occurrence of tachyarrhythmia and improve defibrillation efficacy. However, the mechanism for this beneficial effect is still unclear. Since cardiac mitochondria have been shown to play a crucial role in fatal cardiac arrhythmias and that oxidative stress is one of the main contributors to arrhythmia generation, we tested the effects of cilostazol on cardiac mitochondria under severe oxidative stress.

Methods

Mitochondria were isolated from rat hearts and treated with H₂O₂ to induce oxidative stress. Cilostazol, at various concentrations, was used to study its protective effects. Pharmacological interventions, including a mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) blocker, cyclosporine A (CsA), and an inner membrane anion channel (IMAC) blocker, 4′-chlorodiazepam (CDP), were used to investigate the mechanistic role of cilostazol on cardiac mitochondria. Cardiac mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, mitochondrial membrane potential change and mitochondrial swelling were determined as indicators of cardiac mitochondrial function.

Results

Cilostazol preserved cardiac mitochondrial function when exposed to oxidative stress by preventing mitochondrial depolarization, mitochondrial swelling, and decreasing ROS production.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that cardioprotective effects of cilostazol reported previously could be due to its prevention of cardiac mitochondrial dysfunction caused by severe oxidative stress.

Abnormal repolarization as the basis for late potentials and fractionated electrograms recorded from epicardium in experimental models of Brugada syndrome

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that late potentials and fractionated electrogram activity are due to delayed depolarization within the anterior aspects of right ventricular (RV) epicardium in experimental models of Brugada syndrome (BrS).

BACKGROUND

Clinical reports have demonstrated late potentials on signal-averaged electrocardiography (ECG) recorded in patients with BrS. Recent studies report the appearance of late potentials and fractionated activity on bipolar electrograms recorded in the epicardium of the RV outflow tract in patients with BrS.

METHODS

Action potential and bipolar electrograms were recorded at epicardial and endocardial sites of coronary-perfused canine RV wedge preparations, together with a pseudo-ECG. The transient outward potassium current agonist NS5806 (5 μM) and the Ca(2+)-channel blocker verapamil (2 μM) were used to pharmacologically mimic the BrS genetic defect.

RESULTS

Fractionated electrical activity was observed in RV epicardium, but not in endocardium, as a consequence of heterogeneities in the appearance of the second upstroke of the epicardial action potential, and discrete high-frequency spikes developed as a result of concealed phase 2 re-entry. In no case did we observe primary conduction delay as the cause of the BrS ECG phenotype or of late potential or fractionated electrogram activity. Quinidine (10 μM) and the phosphodiesterase-3 inhibitors cilostazol (10 μM) and milrinone (2.5 μM) restored electrical homogeneity, thus abolishing all late potentials and fractionated electrical activity.

CONCLUSIONS

These data point to an alternative pathophysiological basis for late potentials and fractionated electrical activity recorded in the right ventricle in the setting of BrS. We demonstrate an association of such activity with abnormal repolarization and not with abnormal depolarization or structural abnormalities.

Cellular mechanisms underlying the effects of milrinone and cilostazol to suppress arrhythmogenesis associated with Brugada syndrome

BACKGROUND

Brugada syndrome is an inherited disease associated with vulnerability to ventricular tachycardia and sudden cardiac death in young adults. Milrinone and cilostazol, oral phosphodiesterase (PDE) type III inhibitors, have been shown to increase L-type calcium channel current (ICa) and modestly increase heart rate by elevating the level of intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effectiveness of these PDE inhibitors to suppress arrhythmogenesis in an experimental model of Brugada syndrome.

METHODS

Action potential (AP) and electrocardiographic recordings were obtained from epicardial and endocardial sites of coronary-perfused canine right ventricular wedge preparations. The Ito agonist NS5806 (5 μM) and Ca(2+) channel blocker verapamil (2 μM) were used to pharmacologically mimic Brugada phenotype.

RESULTS

The combination induced all-or-none repolarization at some epicardial sites but not others, leading to ST-segment elevation as well as an increase in both epicardial and transmural dispersion of repolarization. Under these conditions, phase 2 reentry developed as the epicardial AP dome propagated from sites where it was maintained to sites at which it was lost, generating closely coupled extrasystoles and ventricular tachycardia. The addition of the PDE inhibitor milrinone (2.5 μM) or cilostazol (5-10 μM) to the coronary perfusate restored the epicardial AP dome, reduced dispersion, and abolished phase 2 reentry-induced extrasystoles and ventricular tachycardia.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identifies milrinone as a more potent alternative to cilostazol for reversing the repolarization defects responsible for the electrocardiographic and arrhythmic manifestations of Brugada syndrome. Both drugs normalize ST-segment elevation and suppress arrhythmogenesis in experimental models of Brugada syndrome.

Effects of cilostazol in the heart

Cilostazol is a selective phosphodiesterase 3 (PDE3) inhibitor approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of intermittent claudication. It has also been used in bradyarrhythmic patients to increase heart rates. Recently, cilostazol has been shown to prevent ventricular fibrillation in patients with Brugada syndrome. Cilostazol is hypothesized to suppress transient outward potassium (Ito) current and increase inward calcium current, thus, maintaining the dome (phase 2) of action potential, decreasing transmural dispersion of repolarization and preventing ventricular fibrillation. Although many PDE3 inhibitors have been shown to increase cardiac arrhythmia in heart failure, cilostazol has presented effects that are different from other PDE3 inhibitors, especially adenosine uptake inhibition. Owing to this effect, cilostazol could be an effective cardioprotective drug, with its beneficial effects in preventing arrhythmia. In this review, the cardiac electrophysiological effects of cilostazol are presented and its possible cardioprotective effects, particularly in preventing ventricular fibrillation, are discussed, with emphasis on the need to further verify its clinical benefits.