In vivo evaluation of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions between fluorinated pyrimidine anticancer drugs, 5-fluorouracil and capecitabin, and an anticoagulant, warfarin

Warfarin is a common anticoagulant and has demonstrated interactions with several drugs. Among them, as a serious adverse event, a case of death due to the enhanced warfarin action owing to its combined use with a fluoropyrimidine anticancer drug has been reported, but the detailed mechanism has not been elucidated.Some reports have advocated that fluorinated pyrimidine anticancer drugs reduce cytochrome P450 2C9 expression, leading to the enhanced pharmacological effects of warfarin.The purpose of this study was to clarify the mechanisms of drug-drug interactions between warfarin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and capecitabine in vivo using rats. Rats were administered warfarin in combination with 5-FU (15 mg/kg/d) or capecitabine (15 mg/kg/d) for 7 d. Prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time were significantly prolonged in the warfarin plus 5-FU or capecitabine groups compared with those in the warfarin alone group. No significant difference was observed in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of the warfarin alone group compared with the warfarin with 5-FU or capecitabine groups.These data suggest that the enhancement of warfarin efficacy caused by the combination of 5-FU or capecitabine was due to a pharmacological interaction rather than a pharmacokinetic interaction.

Conflicting alterations in hepatic expression of CYP3A and enzyme kinetics in rats exposed to 5-fluorouracil: relevance to pharmacokinetics of midazolam

1. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a pyrimidine derivative widely used for the treatment of cancer. In this study, we investigated the effects of 5-FU on the protein expression of hepatic CYP3A and their enzyme activity for metabolizing midazolam (MDZ), a typical substrate of CYP3A, in rat liver microsomes. We also examined the pharmacokinetic behavior of intravenously administered MDZ in rats treated with 5-FU (120 mg/kg, ip). 2. 5-FU was shown to induce hepatic CYP3A2 protein 2 days after administration without changing the expression of CYP3A1/3A23. However, affinity of 5-FU-inducible CYP3A protein to MDZ for its 4- and 1'-hydroxylation was decreased. Furthermore, the susceptibility of MDZ hydroxylation activity to a CYP3A inhibitor differed between the control and 5-FU groups. 3. Pharmacokinetic analysis of the MDZ disposition demonstrated no significant differences in the total clearance (CL_tot) and elimination rate constant (k_e) between the control and 5-FU-treated rats. Lack of alteration in the metabolic clearance of MDZ may be attributable to the induction of CYP3A protein with reduced affinity for the substrate of CYP3A enzymes. 4. Our findings provide novel information regarding the manifestation of inductive and interfering actions of 5-FU toward hepatic CYP3A to help in assessing the pharmacokinetics of CYP3A substrate drugs.

Altered tolbutamide pharmacokinetics by a decrease in hepatic expression of CYP2C6/11 in rats pretreated with 5-fluorouracil

1. We investigated the change in the pharmacokinetic profile of tolbutamide (TB), a substrate for CYP2C6/11, 4 days after single administration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and the hepatic gene expression and activity of CYP2C6/11 were also examined in 5-FU-pretreated rats. 2. Regarding the pharmacokinetic parameters of the 5-FU group, the area under the curve (AUC) was significantly increased, and correspondingly, the elimination rate constant at the terminal phase (k_e) was significantly decreased without significant change in the volume of distribution at the steady state (Vd_ss). 3. The metabolic production of 4-hydroxylated TB in hepatic microsomes was significantly reduced by the administration of 5-FU. 4. The expression level of mRNAs for hepatic CYP2C6 and CYP2C11 was significantly lower than in the control group when the rats were pretreated with 5-FU. 5. These results demonstrated that the pharmacokinetic profile of TB was altered by the treatment with 5-FU through a metabolic process, which may be responsible for the decreased CYP2C6/11 expression at mRNA levels.

Variations in the Blood Phenytoin Levels during Long-Term Combined Treatment with S-1 and Phenytoin

Although combination therapy with the oral fluoropyrimidine anticancer drug S-1 and the anticonvulsant phenytoin (PHT) is known to increase blood levels of PHT and the risk of intoxication, reports on long-term monitoring of blood levels of PHT during combined S-1 and PHT treatment and a thorough understanding of their interaction are lacking. This report aims to describe interactive effects of S-1 and PHT through long-term therapeutic drug monitoring of PHT. A 72-year-old male had been prescribed oral PHT (130 mg/day) for over 20 years and started receiving S-1 therapy (80 mg/day for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest) as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer. The blood PHT level was continuously monitored. Prior to receiving S-1, the patient's blood PHT concentration was 6.0 μg/ml, but it increased during S-1 therapy, reaching 22.9 μg/ml on day 84 (during a rest period of second cycle S-1 therapy). After reducing his PHT dosage to 100 mg/day, it never reached toxic levels (4.0–10.4 μg/ml). It was difficult to keep blood PHT concentrations constant because of the time lag between the period of combined use of S-1 and PHT and the timing of manifestation and disappearance of the drug interaction. The DIPS probability scale indicated a highly probable interaction between S-1 and PHT. We conclude that, when S-1 and PHT are used concurrently, occurrence and disappearance time of their interaction need to be predicted to maintain an effective and safe PHT concentration.

Significant Effect of Capecitabine on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Warfarin in Patients With Cancer

Purpose

Clinical cases of capecitabine and other fluorouracil-based chemotherapies potentiating the effects of coumarin derivatives have been reported. This study assessed the influence of capecitabine on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of warfarin.

Patients and Methods

Four patients with advanced/metastatic cancer completed the study, receiving a single oral dose of 20 mg warfarin before the start of standard capecitabine treatment (day 1), and again during the third cycle of capecitabine (day 61). PK parameters of warfarin and capecitabine and PD parameters of warfarin were assessed on days 1 and 61.

Results

During capecitabine treatment, the area under the plasma concentration time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞) of S-warfarin increased by 57% (90% CI, 32% to 88%) with a 51% prolongation of the elimination half-life (t1/2; 90% CI, 32% to 74%). Exposure to R-warfarin was not significantly affected. Plasma concentrations of capecitabine and its metabolites were not influenced by warfarin. During capecitabine treatment, the effect of warfarin on the baseline corrected AUC of the International Normalized Ratio (INR) increased by 2.8 times (90% CI, 1.33 to 5.70), with the maximum observed INR value almost doubling. Because of the administration of vitamin K to some patients with elevated INRs, these figures are likely to underestimate the true PD effect. Mean baseline factor VII levels dropped while on capecitabine therapy, potentially contributing to the observed PD interaction, though this effect did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusion

There is a significant pharmacokinetic interaction between capecitabine and S-warfarin, resulting in exaggerated anticoagulant activity. Patients receiving warfarin anticoagulant therapy concomitantly with capecitabine should have their INR closely monitored and warfarin doses adjusted accordingly.

Minidose warfarin prophylaxis for catheter-associated thrombosis in cancer patients: can it be safely associated with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy?

PURPOSE

The use of prophylactic low-dose oral warfarin in cancer patients with a central venous catheter (CVC) in place has an established role in the prevention of thrombotic complications and is associated with a low hemorrhagic risk. Despite the literature indicating an adverse interaction between warfarin and fluorouracil (FU), the frequency of this interaction and whether it occurs when minidose warfarin is used is unknown. We analyzed the incidence of alterations in the International Normalized Ratio (INR) and bleeding in cancer patients given minidose warfarin during treatment with continuous-infusion FU-based regimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between July 1999 and August 2001, 95 cancer patients were evaluated. Forty-one patients (43%) had liver metastases. Seventy-nine patients (83%) had a Groshong CVC (Bard Access System, Salt Lake City, UT), and 16 (17%) had a Port-a-Cath device (Bard Access System). All patients received oral warfarin at a dose of 1 mg/daily as prophylaxis beginning the day after the catheter was positioned. An INR of more than 1.5 was considered significantly elevated.

RESULTS

INR elevation occurred in 31 patients (33%), with 18 patients (19%) having an INR more than 3.0. Twelve (39%) of the 31 patients had liver metastases. Bleeding was observed in eight patients (8%); seven of these patients had elevated INR levels. We observed INR elevations in 12 of 21 patients treated with a FU, folinic acid, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) regimen, 11 of 40 treated with a de Gramont regimen (FU and folinic acid), and five of 19 treated with a FU, folinic acid, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) regimen.

CONCLUSION

A high incidence of INR abnormalities was observed in our cohort of patients, especially those treated with FOLFOX regimen. Clinicians should be aware of this interaction and should regularly monitor the prothrombin time in patients receiving warfarin and FU.