1
|
Thurston C, Deleemans JM, Gisser J, Piercell E, Ramasamy V, Tutelman PR. The Development and Impact of AYA Can-Canadian Cancer Advocacy: A Peer-Led Advocacy Organization for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer in Canada. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:2582-2588. [PMID: 38785474 PMCID: PMC11119832 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31050193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2024] [Revised: 04/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Adolescents and young adults (AYAs; 15-39 years) diagnosed with cancer face disparities in outcomes and survival. Patient advocacy organizations can play a pivotal role in advancing outcomes for underserved health conditions, such as AYA cancer. In 2018 a group of AYA patient advocates founded AYA Canada (later renamed to "AYA Can-Canadian Cancer Advocacy"), a peer-led national organization aimed at improving the experiences and outcomes of Canadian AYAs affected by cancer. The aim of this article is to describe the development and impact of AYA Can. AYA Can was incorporated as a not-for-profit organization in 2021 and became a registered charity in 2023. Since 2018, AYA Can has established a thriving community of practice comprising nearly 300 patients, healthcare providers, researchers, and charitable organizations with an interest in advocacy for AYA cancer. Other activities have included advocacy at academic conferences and on scientific committees, collaboration with scientists to advance AYA cancer research, training the next generation of AYA patient advocates through a "patient ambassador program," and developing a national resource hub to centralize knowledge and information on AYA cancer. Through its work to foster collaboration and amplify patient priorities on a national scale, AYA Can has become a leading voice for AYA cancer advocacy in Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Julie M. Deleemans
- AYA Can—Canadian Cancer Advocacy, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; (J.M.D.)
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3, Canada
| | - Jason Gisser
- AYA Can—Canadian Cancer Advocacy, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; (J.M.D.)
| | - Emily Piercell
- AYA Can—Canadian Cancer Advocacy, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; (J.M.D.)
| | - Vinesha Ramasamy
- AYA Can—Canadian Cancer Advocacy, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; (J.M.D.)
| | - Perri R. Tutelman
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gentilini A, Miraldo M. The role of patient organisations in research and development: Evidence from rare diseases. Soc Sci Med 2023; 338:116332. [PMID: 37866173 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
Patient organisations play an increasingly crucial role in the pharmaceutical sector, yet their impact on innovation remains unexplored. We estimate the impact of patient organisations on R&D activity in the context of rare diseases in Europe using a proprietary dataset that maps clinical trials from discovery to phase III across 29 countries, 1893 indications, and 30 years (1990-2019). By applying difference-in-differences and event study methodologies to a panel of 1,646,910 unique R&D observations, we find that country-indication pairs with at least one operating patient organisation have a higher rate of R&D activity compared to those without, with stronger effect in more prevalent rare diseases compared to ultra-rare conditions. We observe a lag in effects from patient organisation introduction, suggesting it takes approximately five years for these organisations to affect R&D activity. Overall, our work suggests that patient organisations play an important role in steering R&D efforts in rare diseases. Further research is needed to better understand mechanisms driving this effect and the potential impact of patient organisations on existing health inequities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arianna Gentilini
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
| | - Marisa Miraldo
- Department of Economics and Public Policy, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Innovation, Imperial College Business School, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alonso Ruiz A, Large K, Moon S, Vieira M. Pharmaceutical policy and innovation for rare diseases: A narrative review. F1000Res 2023; 12:211. [PMID: 38778810 PMCID: PMC11109548 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.130809.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
This article aims to synthesize the existing literature on the implementation of public policies to incentivize the development of treatments for rare diseases, (diseases with very low prevalence and therefore with low commercial interest) otherwise known as orphan drugs. The implementation of these incentives in the United States (US), Japan, and in the European Union (EU) seems to be related to a substantial increase in treatments for these diseases, and has influenced the way the pharmaceutical research & development (R&D) system operates beyond this policy area. Despite the success of the Orphan Drug model, the academic literature also highlights the negative implications that these public policies have on affordability and access to orphan drugs, as well as on the prioritization of certain disease rare areas over others. The synthesis focuses mostly on the United States' Orphan Drug Act (ODA) as a model for subsequent policies in other regions and countries. It starts with a historical overview of the creation of the term "rare diseases", continues with a summary of the evidence available on the US ODA's positive and negative impacts, and provides a summary of the different proposals to reform these incentives in light of the negative outcomes described. Finally, it describes some key aspects of the Japanese and European policies, as well as some of the challenges captured in the literature related to their impact in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrián Alonso Ruiz
- Global Health Centre, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
| | - Kaitlin Large
- Global Health Centre, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
| | - Suerie Moon
- Global Health Centre, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
| | - Marcela Vieira
- Global Health Centre, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nguyen CQ, Kariyawasam D, Alba‐Concepcion K, Grattan S, Hetherington K, Wakefield CE, Woolfenden S, Dale RC, Palmer EE, Farrar MA. ‘Advocacy groups are the connectors’: Experiences and contributions of rare disease patient organization leaders in advanced neurotherapeutics. Health Expect 2022; 25:3175-3191. [DOI: 10.1111/hex.13625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2022] [Revised: 08/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Q. Nguyen
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Department of Neurology Sydney Children's Hospital Network Randwick New South Wales Australia
| | - Didu Kariyawasam
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Department of Neurology Sydney Children's Hospital Network Randwick New South Wales Australia
| | - Kristine Alba‐Concepcion
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Department of Neurology Sydney Children's Hospital Network Randwick New South Wales Australia
| | - Sarah Grattan
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Department of Neurology Sydney Children's Hospital Network Randwick New South Wales Australia
| | - Kate Hetherington
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre Sydney Children's Hospital Randwick New South Wales Australia
| | - Claire E. Wakefield
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre Sydney Children's Hospital Randwick New South Wales Australia
| | - Susan Woolfenden
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Sydney Institute Women Children and their Families Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Russell C. Dale
- Department of Neurology Sydney Children's Hospital Network Randwick New South Wales Australia
- Children's Hospital at Westmead Clinical School University of Sydney Westmead New South Wales Australia
| | - Elizabeth E. Palmer
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Centre for Clinical Genetics Sydney Children's Hospital Network Randwick New South Wales Australia
| | - Michelle A. Farrar
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Department of Neurology Sydney Children's Hospital Network Randwick New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
The Food and Drug Administration's Role in Dermatologic Drug Development. Dermatol Clin 2022; 40:249-263. [PMID: 35750409 DOI: 10.1016/j.det.2022.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
The mission of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is to ensure the safety and effectiveness of dermatologic drugs, as authorized by the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&CA). In this article, we discuss how the FDA's policies and practices have continued to evolve to incorporate scientific advances and to facilitate approval for dermatologic drugs in a timely manner for a broad spectrum of patients. We provide several examples to highlight areas where the Division of Dermatology and Dentistry found common ground with stakeholders to increase the therapeutic options for dermatologic patients, while still maintaining regulatory standards required for approval.
Collapse
|
6
|
Nguyen CQ, Alba-Concepcion K, Palmer EE, Scully JL, Millis N, Farrar MA. The involvement of rare disease patient organisations in therapeutic innovation across rare paediatric neurological conditions: a narrative review. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2022; 17:167. [PMID: 35436886 PMCID: PMC9014615 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-022-02317-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The patient voice is becoming increasingly prominent across all stages of therapeutic innovation. It pervades research domains from funding and recruitment, to translation, care, and support. Advances in genomic technologies have facilitated novel breakthrough therapies, whose global developments, regulatory approvals, and confined governmental subsidisations have stimulated renewed hope amongst rare disease patient organisations (RDPOs). With intensifying optimism characterising the therapeutic landscape, researcher-advocate partnerships have reached an inflexion point, at which stakeholders may evaluate their achievements and formulate frameworks for future refinement.
Main text
Through this narrative review, we surveyed relevant literature around the roles of RDPOs catering to the rare paediatric neurological disease community. Via available literature, we considered RDPO interactions within seven domains of therapeutic development: research grant funding, industry sponsorship, study recruitment, clinical care and support, patient-reported outcome measures, and research prioritisation. In doing so, we explored practical and ethical challenges, gaps in understanding, and future directions of inquiry. Current literature highlights the increasing significance of ethical and financial challenges to patient advocacy. Biomedical venture philanthropy is gaining momentum amongst RDPOs, whose small grants can incrementally assist laboratories in research, training, and pursuits of more substantial grants. However, RDPO seed funding may encounter long-term sustainability issues and difficulties in selecting appropriate research investments. Further challenges include advocate-industry collaborations, commercial biases, and unresolved controversies regarding orphan drug subsidisation. Beyond their financial interactions, RDPOs serve instrumental roles in project promotion, participant recruitment, biobank creation, and patient registry establishment. They are communication conduits between carers, patients, and other stakeholders, but their contributions may be susceptible to bias and unrealistic expectations.
Conclusion
Further insights into how RDPOs navigate practical and ethical challenges in therapeutic development may enhance cooperative efforts. They may also inform resources, whose distribution among advocates, parents, and clinicians, may assist decision-making processes around rare disease clinical trials and treatments.
Collapse
|
7
|
Advocacy in Action: Leveraging the Power of Patient Voices to Impact Ovarian Cancer Outcomes in Canada. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:1252-1261. [PMID: 35200605 PMCID: PMC8871141 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29020106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Prior to 1997, ovarian cancer (OC) was a ‘poor target’ for patient advocacy. At that time, there were only three OC researchers in Canada, little information available for women diagnosed, and no community of survivors existed. The Corinne Boyer Fund to advance OC was founded in 1997 (later renamed the National Ovarian Cancer Association (NOCA) and subsequently Ovarian Cancer Canada (OCC)), and a Blueprint for Action was established. NOCA developed training programs for public education, partnered with clinicians and scientists, established a Tissue Banking Network across Canada In 2015, the Ladyballs awareness campaign was launched nationally, giving the community a presence and voice. Strategic planning by the organization put advocacy for research funding as a top priority and, working with patients and researchers across the country, petitioned the government for C$10 million in research funding. In 2019, OCC received the funding. In 2020, the OvCAN project was launched with the aim to improve the outcomes of women diagnosed with OC. In the first three years of OvCAN, a pan-Canadian team of 25 Patient Partners was established, and 41 projects to date on research models, pre-clinical and clinical trials covering a wide spectrum of OC types have been funded.
Collapse
|
8
|
Liu P, Gong M, Li J, Baynam G, Zhu W, Zhu Y, Chen L, Gu W, Zhang S. Innovation in Informatics to Improve Clinical Care and Drug Accessibility for Rare Diseases in China. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:719415. [PMID: 34721018 PMCID: PMC8553959 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.719415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: In China, there are severe unmet medical needs of people living with rare diseases. Relatedly, there is a dearth of data to inform rare diseases policy. This is historically partially due to the lack of informatics infrastructure, including standards and terminology, data sharing mechanisms and network; and concerns over patient privacy protection. Objective: This study aims to introduce the progress of China's rare disease informatics platform and knowledgebase, and to discuss critical enablers of rare disease informatics innovation, including: data standardization; knowledgebase construction; national policy support; and multi-stakeholder participation. Methods: A systemic national strategy, delivered through multi-stakeholder engagement, has been implemented to create and accelerate the informatics infrastructure to support rare diseases management. This includes a disease registry system, together with more than 80 hospitals, to perform comprehensive research information collection, including clinical, genomic and bio-sample data. And a case reporting system, with a network of 324 hospitals, covering all mainland Chinese provinces, to further support reporting of rare diseases data. International standards were incorporated, and privacy issues were addressed through HIPAA compliant rules. Results: The National Rare Diseases Registry System of China (NRDRS) now covers 166 rare diseases and more than 63,000 registered patients. The National Rare Diseases Case Reporting System of China (NRDCRS) was primarily founded on the National Network of Rare Diseases (NNRD) of 324 hospitals and focused on real-time rare diseases case reporting; more than 400,000 cases have been reported. Based on the data available in the two systems, the National Center for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) of Orphan Medicinal Products (OMP) has been established and the expert consensus on HTA of OMP was produced. The largest knowledgebase for rare disease in Chinese has also been developed. Conclusion: A national strategy and the coordinating mechanism is the key to success in the improvement of Chinese rare disease clinical care and drug accessibility. Application of innovative informatics solutions can help accelerate the process, improve quality and increase efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Mengchun Gong
- Institute of Health Management, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jie Li
- Digital Health China Technologies Co., LTD, Beijing, China
| | - Gareth Baynam
- Western Australian Register of Developmental Anomalies, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.,Division of Paediatrics and Telethon Kids Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Weiguo Zhu
- State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yicheng Zhu
- State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Limeng Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Weihong Gu
- State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shuyang Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Reason SL, Løkken N, Voermans N. International patient group harnesses social media to help inform rare disease research: use of a low carbohydrate ketogenic diet in McArdle disease. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2021; 28:441-445. [PMID: 34269712 DOI: 10.1097/med.0000000000000663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To highlight the benefits of a partnership between patient advocacy organizations (PAO) and clinical researchers in order to clinically study the prior anecdotal patient experience of utilizing a low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet (LCKD) to manage McArdle disease. RECENT FINDINGS The bedside-to-bench and back again method of translational research is well suited to explore anecdotal patient experiences, particularly for rare diseases. In McArdle disease, patients have explored the use of a LCKD to address the ubiquitous occurrence of physical activity intolerance and minimize associated adverse events. The International Association for Muscle Glycogen Storage Disease harnessed the power of social media to better understand this patient-centric finding and has subsequently partnered with clinical researchers to convey patient-centered priorities for research. From this partnership, a series of clinical and survey studies have been initiated. SUMMARY Collaboration between PAOs and clinical researchers has the potential to foster patient empowerment, advance anecdotal experiences into scientific hypotheses, and ultimately guide the development of management guidelines that reflect the patient perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey L Reason
- International Association for Muscle Glycogen Storage Disease, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Nicoline Løkken
- Copenhagen Neuromuscular Center, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nicol Voermans
- Department of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Müller R, Rach C, Salloch S. Collective forward-looking responsibility of patient advocacy organizations: conceptual and ethical analysis. BMC Med Ethics 2021; 22:113. [PMID: 34425786 PMCID: PMC8383456 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00680-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Patient advocacy organizations (PAOs) have an increasing influence on health policy and biomedical research, therefore, questions about the specific character of their responsibility arise: Can PAOs bear moral responsibility and, if so, to whom are they responsible, for what and on which normative basis? Although the concept of responsibility in healthcare is strongly discussed, PAOs particularly have rarely been systematically analyzed as morally responsible agents. The aim of the current paper is to analyze the character of PAOs’ responsibility to provide guidance to themselves and to other stakeholders in healthcare. Methods Responsibility is presented as a concept with four reference points: (1) The subject, (2) the object, (3) the addressee and (4) the underlying normative standard. This four-point relationship is applied to PAOs and the dimensions of collectivity and prospectivity are analyzed in each reference point. Results Understood as collectives, PAOs are, in principle, capable of intentionality and able to act and, thus, fulfill one prerequisite for the attribution of moral responsibility. Given their common mission to represent those affected, PAOs can be seen as responsible for patients’ representation and advocacy, primarily towards a certain group but secondarily in a broader social context. Various legal and political statements and the bioethical principles of justice, beneficence and empowerment can be used as a normative basis for attributing responsibility to PAOs. Conclusions The understanding of responsibility as a four-point relation incorporating collective and forward-looking dimensions helps one to understand the PAOs’ roles and responsibilities better. The analysis, thus, provides a basis for the debate about PAOs’ contribution and cooperation in the healthcare sector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Regina Müller
- Institute of Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Tübingen, Gartenstraße 47, 72074, Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Christoph Rach
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Wilhelm-Epstein-Straße 4, 60431, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Sabine Salloch
- Institute of Ethics, History and Philosophy of Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Iyer AA, Saade D, Bharucha-Goebel D, Foley AR, Averion G'M, Paredes E, Gray S, Bönnemann CG, Grady C, Hendriks S, Rid A. Ethical challenges for a new generation of early-phase pediatric gene therapy trials. Genet Med 2021; 23:2057-2066. [PMID: 34234300 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01245-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Revised: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
After decades of setbacks, gene therapy (GT) is experiencing major breakthroughs. Five GTs have received US regulatory approval since 2017, and over 900 others are currently in development. Many of these GTs target rare pediatric diseases that are severely life-limiting, given a lack of effective treatments. As these GTs enter early-phase clinical trials, specific ethical challenges remain unresolved in three domains: evaluating risks and potential benefits, selecting participants fairly, and engaging with patient communities. Drawing on our experience as clinical investigators, basic scientists, and bioethicists involved in a first-in-human GT trial for an ultrarare pediatric disease, we analyze these ethical challenges and offer points to consider for future GT trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander A Iyer
- Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Dimah Saade
- Neuromuscular and Neurogenetic Disorders of Childhood Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Diana Bharucha-Goebel
- Neuromuscular and Neurogenetic Disorders of Childhood Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.,Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - A Reghan Foley
- Neuromuscular and Neurogenetic Disorders of Childhood Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Gilberto 'Mike' Averion
- Neuromuscular and Neurogenetic Disorders of Childhood Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Eduardo Paredes
- Neuromuscular and Neurogenetic Disorders of Childhood Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Steven Gray
- University of Texas Southwestern Viral Vector Facility, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Carsten G Bönnemann
- Neuromuscular and Neurogenetic Disorders of Childhood Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Christine Grady
- Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Saskia Hendriks
- Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Annette Rid
- Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hicks JK, Howard R, Reisman P, Adashek JJ, Fields KK, Gray JE, McIver B, McKee K, O'Leary MF, Perkins RM, Robinson E, Tandon A, Teer JK, Markowitz J, Rollison DE. Integrating Somatic and Germline Next-Generation Sequencing Into Routine Clinical Oncology Practice. JCO Precis Oncol 2021; 5:PO.20.00513. [PMID: 34095711 PMCID: PMC8169076 DOI: 10.1200/po.20.00513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2020] [Revised: 02/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is rapidly expanding into routine oncology practice. Genetic variations in both the cancer and inherited genomes are informative for hereditary cancer risk, prognosis, and treatment strategies. Herein, we focus on the clinical perspective of integrating NGS results into patient care to assist with therapeutic decision making. Five key considerations are addressed for operationalization of NGS testing and application of results to patient care as follows: (1) NGS test ordering and workflow design; (2) result reporting, curation, and storage; (3) clinical consultation services that provide test interpretations and identify opportunities for molecularly guided therapy; (4) presentation of genetic information within the electronic health record; and (5) education of providers and patients. Several of these key considerations center on informatics tools that support NGS test ordering and referencing back to the results for therapeutic purposes. Clinical decision support tools embedded within the electronic health record can assist with NGS test utilization and identifying opportunities for targeted therapy including clinical trial eligibility. Challenges for project and change management in operationalizing NGS-supported, evidence-based patient care in the context of current information technology systems with appropriate clinical data standards are discussed, and solutions for overcoming barriers are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Kevin Hicks
- Department of Individualized Cancer Management, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | - Rachel Howard
- Department of Health Informatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Phillip Reisman
- Department of Health Informatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Jacob J. Adashek
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | - Karen K. Fields
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
- Department of Clinical Pathways, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Jhanelle E. Gray
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Bryan McIver
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
- Department of Head and Neck-Endocrine Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Kelly McKee
- Department of Clinical Pathways, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Mandy F. O'Leary
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
- Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Randa M. Perkins
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
- Department of Clinical Informatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Edmondo Robinson
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
- Department of Internal Medicine, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Ankita Tandon
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | - Jamie K. Teer
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Joseph Markowitz
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Dana E. Rollison
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
- Department of Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Prodinger C, Diem A, Ude-Schoder K, Piñón-Hofbauer J, Kitzmueller S, Bauer JW, Laimer M. Profiling trial burden and patients' attitudes to improve clinical research in epidermolysis bullosa. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2020; 15:182. [PMID: 32650809 PMCID: PMC7350741 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-020-01443-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) comprises inherited mechanobullous dermatoses with considerable morbidity and mortality. While current treatments are symptomatic, a growing number of innovative therapeutic compounds are evaluated in clinical trials. Clinical research in rare diseases like EB, however, faces many challenges, including sample size requirements and recruitment failures. The objective of this study was to determine attitudes of EB patients towards clinical research and trial participation as well as the assessment of contextual motivating and discouraging factors in an effort to support patient-centered RD trial designing. Methods A 53-items questionnaire was handed over to EB patients (of all types and ages) in contact with the EB House Austria, a designated national center of expertise for EB care. Main categories included level of interest in and personal knowledge about clinical studies, pros/cons for participation and extent of individual expenses considered acceptable for participation in a clinical study. Descriptive subgroup analysis was calculated with SPSS 20.0 and Microsoft Excel. Results Thirty-six individuals (mean age 25.7 years), diagnosed for recessive dystrophic EB (36.1%), EB simplex (33.4%), junctional EB (8.3%), dominant dystrophic EB (2.8%) and acral peeling syndrome (2.8%) participated. Motivation for participation in and the desire to increase personal knowledge about clinical trials were (outmost) high in 57.2 and 66.7%, respectively. Altruism was the major motivating factor, followed by hope that alleviation of the own symptoms can be achieved. The greatest hurdle was travel distance, followed by concerns about possible adverse reactions. Patients diagnosed for severe subgroups (RDEB, JEB) were more impaired by the extent of scheduled invasive investigations and possible adverse reactions of the study medication. Patients with generally milder EB forms and older patients were accepting more frequent outpatient study visits, blood takes, skin biopsies and inpatient admissions in association with trial participation. Conclusions This study provides additional indications to better determine and address attitudes towards clinical research among EB patients as well as guidance to improve clinical trial protocols for patient centricity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Prodinger
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
| | - Anja Diem
- EB House Austria, Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Katherina Ude-Schoder
- EB House Austria, Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Josefina Piñón-Hofbauer
- EB House Austria, Research Program for Molecular Therapy of Genodermatoses, Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Sophie Kitzmueller
- EB House Austria, Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Johann W Bauer
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Martin Laimer
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Richardson JP, Sharp RR. Meaningful Fissures: The Value of Divergent Agendas in Patient Advocacy. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2020; 20:1-3. [PMID: 32223622 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1735873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
|
15
|
Wolf SM, Ossorio PN, Berry SA, Greely HT, McGuire AL, Penny MA, Terry SF. Integrating Rules for Genomic Research, Clinical Care, Public Health Screening and DTC Testing: Creating Translational Law for Translational Genomics. THE JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS : A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 2020; 48:69-86. [PMID: 32342790 PMCID: PMC7447150 DOI: 10.1177/1073110520916996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Human genomics is a translational field spanning research, clinical care, public health, and direct-to-consumer testing. However, law differs across these domains on issues including liability, consent, promoting quality of analysis and interpretation, and safeguarding privacy. Genomic activities crossing domains can thus encounter confusion and conflicts among these approaches. This paper suggests how to resolve these conflicts while protecting the rights and interests of individuals sequenced. Translational genomics requires this more translational approach to law.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M Wolf
- Susan M. Wolf, J.D., is McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; and Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota. She is also Chair of the University's Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences. She is a Principal Investigator on an NIH-supported project on "LawSeq: Building a Sound Legal Foundation for Translating Genomics into Clinical Application" (NHGRI/NCI # R01HG008605; Wolf, Clayton, Lawrenz, PIs). Pilar N. Ossorio, Ph.D., J.D., is Professor of Law and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she is on the faculties of the Law School and the Department of Medical History and Bioethics at the Medical School. She is Ethics Scholar-in-Residence at the Morgridge Institute for Research, Co-Director of UW's Law and Neuroscience Program, a faculty member in the UW Masters in Biotechnology Studies program, and Program Faculty in the Graduate Program in Population Health. Susan A. Berry, M.D., is Division Director for Genetics and Metabolism in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Minnesota. She is a Professor in the Departments of Pediatrics, Ophthalmology and Genetics, Cell Biology and Development. She is a member of the Minnesota Department of Health Newborn Screening Advisory Committee, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a Fellow of the American College of Medical Genetics. Henry T. Greely, J.D., is the Deane F. and Kate Edelman Johnson Professor of Law and Professor, by courtesy, of Genetics at Stanford University. He chairs the California Advisory Committee on Human Stem Cell Research and the steering committee of the Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics, and directs the Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences and the Stanford Program in Neuroscience and Society. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the Baylor College of Medicine. She served on the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research 2011-15 and is immediate past-President of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors. Michelle A. Penny, Ph.D., is Head of the Translational Genome Sciences Group at Biogen. She is Co-Chair of the National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health and the Industry Pharmacogenomics Working Group. Sharon F. Terry, M.A., is President and Chief Executive Officer of Genetic Alliance and co-founder of the Genetic Alliance Registry and Biobank. She has served in a leadership role on organizations including the Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Advisory Panel; Cures Acceleration Network Review Board and Advisory Council, National Center for Accelerating Translation Science, NIH; National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health; Global Alliance for Genomics and Health; and International Rare Disease Research Consortium Executive Committee. Organizations are listed here for author identification only
| | - Pilar N Ossorio
- Susan M. Wolf, J.D., is McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; and Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota. She is also Chair of the University's Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences. She is a Principal Investigator on an NIH-supported project on "LawSeq: Building a Sound Legal Foundation for Translating Genomics into Clinical Application" (NHGRI/NCI # R01HG008605; Wolf, Clayton, Lawrenz, PIs). Pilar N. Ossorio, Ph.D., J.D., is Professor of Law and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she is on the faculties of the Law School and the Department of Medical History and Bioethics at the Medical School. She is Ethics Scholar-in-Residence at the Morgridge Institute for Research, Co-Director of UW's Law and Neuroscience Program, a faculty member in the UW Masters in Biotechnology Studies program, and Program Faculty in the Graduate Program in Population Health. Susan A. Berry, M.D., is Division Director for Genetics and Metabolism in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Minnesota. She is a Professor in the Departments of Pediatrics, Ophthalmology and Genetics, Cell Biology and Development. She is a member of the Minnesota Department of Health Newborn Screening Advisory Committee, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a Fellow of the American College of Medical Genetics. Henry T. Greely, J.D., is the Deane F. and Kate Edelman Johnson Professor of Law and Professor, by courtesy, of Genetics at Stanford University. He chairs the California Advisory Committee on Human Stem Cell Research and the steering committee of the Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics, and directs the Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences and the Stanford Program in Neuroscience and Society. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the Baylor College of Medicine. She served on the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research 2011-15 and is immediate past-President of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors. Michelle A. Penny, Ph.D., is Head of the Translational Genome Sciences Group at Biogen. She is Co-Chair of the National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health and the Industry Pharmacogenomics Working Group. Sharon F. Terry, M.A., is President and Chief Executive Officer of Genetic Alliance and co-founder of the Genetic Alliance Registry and Biobank. She has served in a leadership role on organizations including the Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Advisory Panel; Cures Acceleration Network Review Board and Advisory Council, National Center for Accelerating Translation Science, NIH; National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health; Global Alliance for Genomics and Health; and International Rare Disease Research Consortium Executive Committee. Organizations are listed here for author identification only
| | - Susan A Berry
- Susan M. Wolf, J.D., is McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; and Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota. She is also Chair of the University's Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences. She is a Principal Investigator on an NIH-supported project on "LawSeq: Building a Sound Legal Foundation for Translating Genomics into Clinical Application" (NHGRI/NCI # R01HG008605; Wolf, Clayton, Lawrenz, PIs). Pilar N. Ossorio, Ph.D., J.D., is Professor of Law and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she is on the faculties of the Law School and the Department of Medical History and Bioethics at the Medical School. She is Ethics Scholar-in-Residence at the Morgridge Institute for Research, Co-Director of UW's Law and Neuroscience Program, a faculty member in the UW Masters in Biotechnology Studies program, and Program Faculty in the Graduate Program in Population Health. Susan A. Berry, M.D., is Division Director for Genetics and Metabolism in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Minnesota. She is a Professor in the Departments of Pediatrics, Ophthalmology and Genetics, Cell Biology and Development. She is a member of the Minnesota Department of Health Newborn Screening Advisory Committee, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a Fellow of the American College of Medical Genetics. Henry T. Greely, J.D., is the Deane F. and Kate Edelman Johnson Professor of Law and Professor, by courtesy, of Genetics at Stanford University. He chairs the California Advisory Committee on Human Stem Cell Research and the steering committee of the Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics, and directs the Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences and the Stanford Program in Neuroscience and Society. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the Baylor College of Medicine. She served on the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research 2011-15 and is immediate past-President of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors. Michelle A. Penny, Ph.D., is Head of the Translational Genome Sciences Group at Biogen. She is Co-Chair of the National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health and the Industry Pharmacogenomics Working Group. Sharon F. Terry, M.A., is President and Chief Executive Officer of Genetic Alliance and co-founder of the Genetic Alliance Registry and Biobank. She has served in a leadership role on organizations including the Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Advisory Panel; Cures Acceleration Network Review Board and Advisory Council, National Center for Accelerating Translation Science, NIH; National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health; Global Alliance for Genomics and Health; and International Rare Disease Research Consortium Executive Committee. Organizations are listed here for author identification only
| | - Henry T Greely
- Susan M. Wolf, J.D., is McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; and Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota. She is also Chair of the University's Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences. She is a Principal Investigator on an NIH-supported project on "LawSeq: Building a Sound Legal Foundation for Translating Genomics into Clinical Application" (NHGRI/NCI # R01HG008605; Wolf, Clayton, Lawrenz, PIs). Pilar N. Ossorio, Ph.D., J.D., is Professor of Law and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she is on the faculties of the Law School and the Department of Medical History and Bioethics at the Medical School. She is Ethics Scholar-in-Residence at the Morgridge Institute for Research, Co-Director of UW's Law and Neuroscience Program, a faculty member in the UW Masters in Biotechnology Studies program, and Program Faculty in the Graduate Program in Population Health. Susan A. Berry, M.D., is Division Director for Genetics and Metabolism in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Minnesota. She is a Professor in the Departments of Pediatrics, Ophthalmology and Genetics, Cell Biology and Development. She is a member of the Minnesota Department of Health Newborn Screening Advisory Committee, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a Fellow of the American College of Medical Genetics. Henry T. Greely, J.D., is the Deane F. and Kate Edelman Johnson Professor of Law and Professor, by courtesy, of Genetics at Stanford University. He chairs the California Advisory Committee on Human Stem Cell Research and the steering committee of the Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics, and directs the Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences and the Stanford Program in Neuroscience and Society. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the Baylor College of Medicine. She served on the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research 2011-15 and is immediate past-President of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors. Michelle A. Penny, Ph.D., is Head of the Translational Genome Sciences Group at Biogen. She is Co-Chair of the National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health and the Industry Pharmacogenomics Working Group. Sharon F. Terry, M.A., is President and Chief Executive Officer of Genetic Alliance and co-founder of the Genetic Alliance Registry and Biobank. She has served in a leadership role on organizations including the Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Advisory Panel; Cures Acceleration Network Review Board and Advisory Council, National Center for Accelerating Translation Science, NIH; National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health; Global Alliance for Genomics and Health; and International Rare Disease Research Consortium Executive Committee. Organizations are listed here for author identification only
| | - Amy L McGuire
- Susan M. Wolf, J.D., is McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; and Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota. She is also Chair of the University's Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences. She is a Principal Investigator on an NIH-supported project on "LawSeq: Building a Sound Legal Foundation for Translating Genomics into Clinical Application" (NHGRI/NCI # R01HG008605; Wolf, Clayton, Lawrenz, PIs). Pilar N. Ossorio, Ph.D., J.D., is Professor of Law and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she is on the faculties of the Law School and the Department of Medical History and Bioethics at the Medical School. She is Ethics Scholar-in-Residence at the Morgridge Institute for Research, Co-Director of UW's Law and Neuroscience Program, a faculty member in the UW Masters in Biotechnology Studies program, and Program Faculty in the Graduate Program in Population Health. Susan A. Berry, M.D., is Division Director for Genetics and Metabolism in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Minnesota. She is a Professor in the Departments of Pediatrics, Ophthalmology and Genetics, Cell Biology and Development. She is a member of the Minnesota Department of Health Newborn Screening Advisory Committee, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a Fellow of the American College of Medical Genetics. Henry T. Greely, J.D., is the Deane F. and Kate Edelman Johnson Professor of Law and Professor, by courtesy, of Genetics at Stanford University. He chairs the California Advisory Committee on Human Stem Cell Research and the steering committee of the Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics, and directs the Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences and the Stanford Program in Neuroscience and Society. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the Baylor College of Medicine. She served on the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research 2011-15 and is immediate past-President of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors. Michelle A. Penny, Ph.D., is Head of the Translational Genome Sciences Group at Biogen. She is Co-Chair of the National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health and the Industry Pharmacogenomics Working Group. Sharon F. Terry, M.A., is President and Chief Executive Officer of Genetic Alliance and co-founder of the Genetic Alliance Registry and Biobank. She has served in a leadership role on organizations including the Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Advisory Panel; Cures Acceleration Network Review Board and Advisory Council, National Center for Accelerating Translation Science, NIH; National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health; Global Alliance for Genomics and Health; and International Rare Disease Research Consortium Executive Committee. Organizations are listed here for author identification only
| | - Michelle A Penny
- Susan M. Wolf, J.D., is McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; and Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota. She is also Chair of the University's Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences. She is a Principal Investigator on an NIH-supported project on "LawSeq: Building a Sound Legal Foundation for Translating Genomics into Clinical Application" (NHGRI/NCI # R01HG008605; Wolf, Clayton, Lawrenz, PIs). Pilar N. Ossorio, Ph.D., J.D., is Professor of Law and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she is on the faculties of the Law School and the Department of Medical History and Bioethics at the Medical School. She is Ethics Scholar-in-Residence at the Morgridge Institute for Research, Co-Director of UW's Law and Neuroscience Program, a faculty member in the UW Masters in Biotechnology Studies program, and Program Faculty in the Graduate Program in Population Health. Susan A. Berry, M.D., is Division Director for Genetics and Metabolism in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Minnesota. She is a Professor in the Departments of Pediatrics, Ophthalmology and Genetics, Cell Biology and Development. She is a member of the Minnesota Department of Health Newborn Screening Advisory Committee, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a Fellow of the American College of Medical Genetics. Henry T. Greely, J.D., is the Deane F. and Kate Edelman Johnson Professor of Law and Professor, by courtesy, of Genetics at Stanford University. He chairs the California Advisory Committee on Human Stem Cell Research and the steering committee of the Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics, and directs the Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences and the Stanford Program in Neuroscience and Society. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the Baylor College of Medicine. She served on the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research 2011-15 and is immediate past-President of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors. Michelle A. Penny, Ph.D., is Head of the Translational Genome Sciences Group at Biogen. She is Co-Chair of the National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health and the Industry Pharmacogenomics Working Group. Sharon F. Terry, M.A., is President and Chief Executive Officer of Genetic Alliance and co-founder of the Genetic Alliance Registry and Biobank. She has served in a leadership role on organizations including the Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Advisory Panel; Cures Acceleration Network Review Board and Advisory Council, National Center for Accelerating Translation Science, NIH; National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health; Global Alliance for Genomics and Health; and International Rare Disease Research Consortium Executive Committee. Organizations are listed here for author identification only
| | - Sharon F Terry
- Susan M. Wolf, J.D., is McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; and Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota. She is also Chair of the University's Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences. She is a Principal Investigator on an NIH-supported project on "LawSeq: Building a Sound Legal Foundation for Translating Genomics into Clinical Application" (NHGRI/NCI # R01HG008605; Wolf, Clayton, Lawrenz, PIs). Pilar N. Ossorio, Ph.D., J.D., is Professor of Law and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she is on the faculties of the Law School and the Department of Medical History and Bioethics at the Medical School. She is Ethics Scholar-in-Residence at the Morgridge Institute for Research, Co-Director of UW's Law and Neuroscience Program, a faculty member in the UW Masters in Biotechnology Studies program, and Program Faculty in the Graduate Program in Population Health. Susan A. Berry, M.D., is Division Director for Genetics and Metabolism in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Minnesota. She is a Professor in the Departments of Pediatrics, Ophthalmology and Genetics, Cell Biology and Development. She is a member of the Minnesota Department of Health Newborn Screening Advisory Committee, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a Fellow of the American College of Medical Genetics. Henry T. Greely, J.D., is the Deane F. and Kate Edelman Johnson Professor of Law and Professor, by courtesy, of Genetics at Stanford University. He chairs the California Advisory Committee on Human Stem Cell Research and the steering committee of the Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics, and directs the Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences and the Stanford Program in Neuroscience and Society. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the Baylor College of Medicine. She served on the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research 2011-15 and is immediate past-President of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors. Michelle A. Penny, Ph.D., is Head of the Translational Genome Sciences Group at Biogen. She is Co-Chair of the National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health and the Industry Pharmacogenomics Working Group. Sharon F. Terry, M.A., is President and Chief Executive Officer of Genetic Alliance and co-founder of the Genetic Alliance Registry and Biobank. She has served in a leadership role on organizations including the Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Advisory Panel; Cures Acceleration Network Review Board and Advisory Council, National Center for Accelerating Translation Science, NIH; National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health; Global Alliance for Genomics and Health; and International Rare Disease Research Consortium Executive Committee. Organizations are listed here for author identification only
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Li DG, Singer S, Mostaghimi A. Prevalence and Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest in Dermatology Patient Advocacy Organizations. JAMA Dermatol 2020; 155:460-464. [PMID: 30698625 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.5102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Patient advocacy organizations are nonprofit organizations that represent patients with medical conditions. Although these organizations may increase disease awareness and influence health care policy, reports have suggested financial relationships between organizations and drug, device, and biotechnology companies, which may lead to potential conflicts of interest. The extent of these conflicts has not been explored among patient advocacy organizations in dermatology. Objective To examine potential financial conflicts of interest and characterize disclosure practices among dermatology patient advocacy organizations. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study of the largest dermatology patient advocacy organizations using the Kaiser Health News database acquired data on total revenue from each organization's Form 990 for the year 2015. Tax forms and annual reports from 2017 were used for 2 organizations that were missing donor information for 2015. Annual reports, websites, and LinkedIn profiles were manually examined to ascertain donations and determine disclosure practices pertaining to financial support and board membership. Main Outcomes and Measures The amount and minimum proportion of donations attributable to industry sponsorship among organizations as well as the proportion of organizations disclosing (1) industry-sponsored financial support, (2) the amount of industry-derived donations, and (3) current and past relationships between governing board members and industry sponsors. Results This study identified 24 dermatology patient advocacy organizations with annual revenues that exceeded $500 000. Of these, 5 (21%) had total donations that exceeded $5 million and 4 (17%) reported industry donations that exceeded $500 000. Two organizations (8%) reported having at least 40% of total donations from industry sponsorship. Overall, 17 organizations (71%) reported receiving donations from industry on the annual report or the website and 12 (50%) reported the amount of donations in ranges. None of the organizations reported the exact amount or use of donations. On the basis of annual reports and websites, 3 organizations (13%) reported having a current or former industry executive on the organization's governing board. When this search was replicated using LinkedIn, this figure was at least 54%. Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest inconsistent disclosure of industry-derived financial support and board membership that may represent conflicts of interest. Policies that support the transparency and consistency of disclosure practices between industry and patient advocacy organizations appear to be needed to fully characterize the extent of conflicts of interest among patient advocacy organizations in dermatology and maintain trust in these important institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David G Li
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sean Singer
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Arash Mostaghimi
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Khodyakov D, Grant S, Denger B, Kinnett K, Martin A, Peay H, Coulter I. Practical Considerations in Using Online Modified-Delphi Approaches to Engage Patients and Other Stakeholders in Clinical Practice Guideline Development. THE PATIENT 2020; 13:11-21. [PMID: 31544219 PMCID: PMC6957573 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-019-00389-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Patients and caregivers are increasingly recognized as key stakeholders in developing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Online engagement approaches offer the promise of a rigorous, scalable, and convenient engagement method. This paper illustrates how an online modified-Delphi approach could be used to engage patients, caregivers, and other stakeholder in CPG development. It provides practical guidance for conducting online modified-Delphi panels that covers (1) joint development of the engagement approach with relevant stakeholders, (2) adaptation of methods used by experts in guideline development, (3) pilot testing, (4) participant recruitment, (5) determining panel size and composition, (6) building participant capacity, (7) facilitation of two-way interaction, (8) continuous engagement and retention of participants, (9) rigorous data analysis, (10) evaluation of engagement activities, and (11) result dissemination. The paper is based on a recently completed study about engaging individuals with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and their caregivers in determining the patient-centeredness of DMD care guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dmitry Khodyakov
- RAND Health Care, RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, PO Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA USA
| | - Sean Grant
- RAND Health Care, RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, PO Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA USA
- Indiana University, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN USA
| | - Brian Denger
- Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy, Hackensack, NJ USA
| | - Kathi Kinnett
- Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy, Hackensack, NJ USA
| | - Ann Martin
- Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy, Hackensack, NJ USA
| | - Holly Peay
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC USA
| | - Ian Coulter
- RAND Health Care, RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, PO Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rach C, Lukas J, Müller R, Sendler M, Simon P, Salloch S. Involving Patient Groups in Drug Research: A Systematic Review of Reasons. Patient Prefer Adherence 2020; 14:587-597. [PMID: 32210544 PMCID: PMC7075437 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s232499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients have evolved from mere objects of study to active contributors to drug research in recent decades. Since individual patient's influence to change research processes effectively is limited, patient groups play an important role in the planning and conducting of pharmaceutical studies. Patient group engagement in drug research is usually seen as being beneficial from an ethical viewpoint as well as from the perspective of research practice, while potential disadvantages and risks have been discussed considerably less. PURPOSE A systematic review of reasons was conducted to allow for an overview of the reasons for and against involving patient groups in drug research. METHODS The literature search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science. Reasons concerning the influence of patient groups on drug research were extracted and synthesized using qualitative content analysis. The review's main limitation arises from a lack of critical appraisal regarding the quality of the reasons. RESULTS A total of 2271 references were retrieved, of which 97 were included in the analysis. Data extraction revealed 91 (73.4%) reasons for and 30 (24.2%) reasons against involving patient organizations in drug research, and 3 (2.4%) ambivalent reasons; amounting to 124 reasons. The main groups of reasons were clustered around the categories: quality of research, acquisition and allocation of resources, and the patient role in research. CONCLUSION This is the first systematic review of reasons concerning the influence of patient groups on drug research. It provides a basis for a continuing debate about the value as well as the limits of involving patient groups. Due to the diversity of research projects there can be no general recommendation for or against patient group involvement. More research is necessary to assess potential advantages and disadvantages of patient groups' influence on other types of research (eg genetics).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Rach
- Institute of Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
- Correspondence: Christoph Rach Institute of Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstr. 1-2, 17487 Greifswald, GermanyTel +49 3834 865780Fax +49 3834 865782 Email
| | - Jan Lukas
- Translational Neurodegeneration Section (Albrecht-Kossel), Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Regina Müller
- Institute of Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Matthias Sendler
- Department of Medicine A, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Peter Simon
- Department of Medicine A, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Sabine Salloch
- Institute of Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Horrow C, Pacyna JE, Cosenza C, Sharp RR. Examining Physician Interactions with Disease Advocacy Organizations. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2019; 10:222-230. [PMID: 31449475 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2019.1652213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Disease advocacy organizations (DAOs) have traditionally focused on raising awareness of rare diseases, providing educational resources to patients, and supporting patients and families. Previous research has described how scientists collaborate with DAOs, but few empirical data are available regarding the extent to which physicians interact with DAOs and how those interactions impact patient care. We conducted a national survey of 230 board-certified pediatric neurologists to assess their engagement with DAOs and their beliefs about the impact of DAOs on patient care. In that context, we evaluated a set of 24 items describing interactions between physicians and DAOs. Exploratory factor analysis produced a 19-item model capturing four types of physician-DAO engagement: (1) accessing or distributing DAO-produced materials (6 items, alpha = 0.80); (2) consulting on DAO activities (5 items, alpha = 0.81); (3) collaborating with DAOs on research activities (6 items, alpha = 0.80); and (4) co-producing scholarly materials with DAOs (2 items, alpha = 0.80). Our data indicate that physicians engage with DAOs in more frequent and diverse ways than has been previously reported. Almost all physicians in our sample had interacted directly with a DAO in some way, from low-effort activities such as visiting a DAO's website to deeper forms of engagement including coauthoring journal articles. These findings may provide a framework for bioethicists to characterize the nature and extent of physician interactions with advocacy organizations, which is critical for evaluating the ethical implications of physician-DAO relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Horrow
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic , Rochester , Minnesota , USA
| | - Joel E Pacyna
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic , Rochester , Minnesota , USA
| | - Carol Cosenza
- Center for Survey Research, University of Massachusetts Boston , Boston , Massachusetts , USA
| | - Richard R Sharp
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Rochester , Minnesota , USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Berry SA, Coughlin CR, McCandless S, McCarter R, Seminara J, Yudkoff M, LeMons C. Developing interactions with industry in rare diseases: lessons learned and continuing challenges. Genet Med 2019; 22:219-226. [PMID: 31337884 PMCID: PMC6944635 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0616-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) established the Rare Diseases
Clinical Research Network to address the unique challenges of performing research on
rare diseases. The Urea Cycle Disorders Consortium (UCDC) was one of the original
ten consortia established. The UCDC represents a unique partnership among
clinicians, patients, and the NIH with a primary goal of increasing the development
of therapeutics that improve patient outcomes for persons affected with a UCD. Based
in part on financial incentives associated with the Orphan Drug Act
biopharmaceutical and investment entities have an intense interest in engaging with
research consortia like the UCDC, which have compiled potentially valuable
longitudinal data characterizing outcomes in a relatively large number of affected
individuals. We describe the UCDC experience and the bases for evaluating
partnerships with such private entities. We review early industry interactions, the
development of policies and procedures, and describe the establishment of an
Industry Relations Committee, including guiding principles. Challenges encountered,
particularly in the transition when products are approved, and potential solutions
are discussed. By building a framework for industry partnerships that guides us in
resolving inevitable challenges, we can enthusiastically pursue novel and promising
collaborations that can lead to breakthroughs in therapeutic interventions for
patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan A Berry
- Division of Genetics and Metabolism, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| | - Curtis R Coughlin
- Section of Genetics and Metabolism, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Shawn McCandless
- Section of Genetics and Metabolism, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Robert McCarter
- Children's Research Institute, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jennifer Seminara
- Children's Research Institute, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Mark Yudkoff
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Cynthia LeMons
- National Urea Cycle Disorders Foundation, Pasadena, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Choudhury MC, Saberwal G. The role of patient organizations in the rare disease ecosystem in India: an interview based study. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2019; 14:117. [PMID: 31142331 PMCID: PMC6542017 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-019-1093-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2019] [Accepted: 05/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Rare diseases (RDs) affect a small percentage of the population but can be severely debilitating and life-threatening. Historically, patient groups (PGs) have been the prime movers in raising awareness about these diseases and advocating for national supportive policies. They have also driven relevant research programs. In India too, PGs have made significant contributions to the national RD ecosystem. Objective To assess the contribution of various Indian RD PGs, we carried out an interview-based study of 19organizations. This study aims to highlight the origins and achievements of these groups and the challenges that they have faced. The study also helps to capture the changes in the RD ecosystem that have taken place in recent years. Result Of the 19 PGs, two are umbrella organizations, two are other organizations of national scope and 15 are disease specific groups. 14 interviewees were affected by an RD either directly or through a family member. Lack of awareness about RDs in the medical community was the biggest challenge, leading to a delay in diagnosis and subsequent management. Only two out of the 15 conditions have a definitive treatment. However, many of the diseases can be managed with replacement therapies administered for the patient’s entire life, or other supportive therapies. Most diagnostics and treatment regimens that are available globally are now available in India but are expensive and usually available only in a few major cities. These problems are compounded by a lack of medical insurance schemes and government policies to support these patients. The biggest achievement of the PGs was the passing of National Policy for Treatment of Rare Diseases in 2017, unfortunately since put in abeyance. If reinstated, and properly implemented, this policy could significantly improve RD management in the country. Conclusion PGs have had a significant role in bringing diagnostics and treatments to India. They have also raised awareness about RDs and related issues such as newborn screening, prenatal diagnostics and genetic counselling. This study highlighted the recommendations of various PGs. The government should address these recommendations and institutionalize the participation of the PGs in formal decision making. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13023-019-1093-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohua Chakraborty Choudhury
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Applied Biotechnology, Biotech Park, Electronics City Phase 1, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560100, India
| | - Gayatri Saberwal
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Applied Biotechnology, Biotech Park, Electronics City Phase 1, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560100, India.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Petersen A, Schermuly AC, Anderson A. The shifting politics of patient activism: From bio-sociality to bio-digital citizenship. Health (London) 2018; 23:478-494. [PMID: 30526091 DOI: 10.1177/1363459318815944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Digital media provide novel tools for patient activists from disease- and condition-specific communities. While those with debilitating conditions or disabilities have long recognised the value of collective action for advancing their interests, digital media offer activists unparalleled opportunities to fulfil their goals. This article explores the shifting politics of 'activism' in the increasingly digitally mediated, commercialised context of healthcare, asking: what role have digital media played in the repertoire of activists' strategies? And, to what extent and how has the use of such media impacted the very concept of activism? Building on sociological ideas on emergent forms of 'biological citizenship' and drawing on findings from an analysis of available media, including television and print news reportage, online communications, published histories and campaign material and other information produced by activists in HIV/AIDS and breast cancer communities, we argue that digital media have profoundly shaped how 'activism' is enacted, both the goals pursued and the strategies adopted, which serve to broadly align contemporary patient communities' interests with those of science and business. This alignment, which we characterise as 'bio-digital citizenship', has involved a fundamental reorientation of 'activism' from less of a struggle for rights to more of a striving to achieve a public profile and attract funding. We conclude by calling for a reconceptualisation of 'activism' to more adequately reflect the workings of power in the digital age, whereby the agency and hopes of citizens are central to the workings of political rule.
Collapse
|
23
|
|
24
|
Zolkipli-Cunningham Z, Xiao R, Stoddart A, McCormick EM, Holberts A, Burrill N, McCormack S, Williams L, Wang X, Thompson JLP, Falk MJ. Mitochondrial disease patient motivations and barriers to participate in clinical trials. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0197513. [PMID: 29771953 PMCID: PMC5957366 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2017] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Clinical treatment trials are increasingly being designed in primary mitochondrial disease (PMD), a phenotypically and genetically heterogeneous collection of inherited multi- system energy deficiency disorders that lack effective therapy. We sought to identify motivating factors and barriers to clinical trial participation in PMD. Methods A survey study was conducted in two independent mitochondrial disease subject cohorts. A discovery cohort invited subjects with well-defined biochemical or molecularly- confirmed PMD followed at a single medical center (CHOP, n = 30/67 (45%) respondents). A replication cohort included self-identified PMD subjects in the Rare Disease Clinical Research Network (RDCRN) national contact registry (n = 290/1119 (26%) respondents). Five-point Likert scale responses were analyzed using descriptive and quantitative statistics. Experienced and prioritized symptoms for trial participation, and patient attitudes toward detailed aspects of clinical trial drug features and study design. Results PMD subjects experienced an average of 16 symptoms. Muscle weakness, chronic fatigue, and exercise intolerance were the lead symptoms encouraging trial participation. Motivating trial design factors included a self-administered study drug; vitamin, antioxidant, natural or plant-derivative; pills; daily treatment; guaranteed treatment access during and after study; short travel distances; and late-stage (phase 3) participation. Relative trial participation barriers included a new study drug; discontinuation of current medications; disease progression; daily phlebotomy; and requiring participant payment. Treatment trial type or design preferences were not influenced by population age (pediatric versus adult), prior research trial experience, or disease severity. Conclusions These data are the first to convey clear PMD subject preferences and priorities to enable improved clinical treatment trial design that cuts across the complex diversity of disease. Partnering with rare disease patient communities is essential to effectively design robust clinical trials that engage patients and enable meaningful evaluation of emerging treatment interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zarazuela Zolkipli-Cunningham
- Division of Neurology, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Mitochondrial Medicine Frontier Program, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Rui Xiao
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Amy Stoddart
- Mitochondrial Medicine Frontier Program, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Arcadia University, Glenside, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Division of Human Genetics, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Elizabeth M. McCormick
- Mitochondrial Medicine Frontier Program, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Division of Human Genetics, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Amy Holberts
- Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network, Health Informatics Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States of America
| | - Natalie Burrill
- Mitochondrial Medicine Frontier Program, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Shana McCormack
- Mitochondrial Medicine Frontier Program, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Lauren Williams
- Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Xiaoyan Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - John L. P. Thompson
- Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Marni J. Falk
- Mitochondrial Medicine Frontier Program, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Division of Human Genetics, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kraft SA, Cho MK, Gillespie K, Halley M, Varsava N, Ormond KE, Luft HS, Wilfond BS, Soo-Jin Lee S. Beyond Consent: Building Trusting Relationships With Diverse Populations in Precision Medicine Research. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2018; 18:3-20. [PMID: 29621457 PMCID: PMC6173191 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1431322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
With the growth of precision medicine research on health data and biospecimens, research institutions will need to build and maintain long-term, trusting relationships with patient-participants. While trust is important for all research relationships, the longitudinal nature of precision medicine research raises particular challenges for facilitating trust when the specifics of future studies are unknown. Based on focus groups with racially and ethnically diverse patients, we describe several factors that influence patient trust and potential institutional approaches to building trustworthiness. Drawing on these findings, we suggest several considerations for research institutions seeking to cultivate long-term, trusting relationships with patients: (1) Address the role of history and experience on trust, (2) engage concerns about potential group harm, (3) address cultural values and communication barriers, and (4) integrate patient values and expectations into oversight and governance structures.
Collapse
|
26
|
Redley M, Pannebakker M, Holland A. Improving the Health and Well-Being of Adults With Conditions of a Genetic Origin: Views from Professionals, Syndrome Support Groups and Parents. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES 2018; 31:62-75. [PMID: 27778465 PMCID: PMC5763345 DOI: 10.1111/jar.12293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/26/2016] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in medical genetics herald the possibility that health and social care services could be more responsive to the needs arising from a person's genotype. This development may be particularly important for those men and women whose learning disability (known internationally as intellectual disability) is linked to a neurodevelopmental condition of genetic origin. METHOD This possibility is tested through interviews with samples of (i) professional 'opinion former' with nationally recognised clinical and/or academic interests in learning disabilities and genetics; (ii) representatives of syndrome organisations prompting the interests of families where someone has a neurodevelopmental condition, and parent-members of these same organisations. RESULTS The reporting and discussion of the interview data considers the possibility that notwithstanding the successes of the social model of disability, the health and wellbeing of people whose learning disability is associated with a neurodevelopmental condition could be better served by a more medicalised approach to their interests. CONCLUSION While a more medicalised approach to this populations' disabilities would appear to be beneficial, so long as it is focused on interventions to improve their lives rather than catalogues their deficiencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus Redley
- Cambridge Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research GroupUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
- National Institute for health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) East of England at Cambridge and Peterborough NHS Foundation TrustCambridgeUK
| | - Merel Pannebakker
- Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Anthony Holland
- Cambridge Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research GroupUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
- National Institute for health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) East of England at Cambridge and Peterborough NHS Foundation TrustCambridgeUK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Aungst H, Fishman JR, McGowan ML. Participatory Genomic Research: Ethical Issues from the Bottom Up to the Top Down. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2017; 18:357-367. [DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-091416-035230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Heide Aungst
- Center for Pediatric Genomics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229
| | - Jennifer R. Fishman
- Biomedical Ethics Unit, Department of Social Studies of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1X1, Canada
| | - Michelle L. McGowan
- Ethics Center, Division of General and Community Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229
- Department of Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chasing cures: Rewards and risks for rare disease patient organisations involved in research. BIOSOCIETIES 2017. [DOI: 10.1057/s41292-017-0061-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
29
|
Budin-Ljøsne I, Harris JR. Patient and interest organizations' views on personalized medicine: a qualitative study. BMC Med Ethics 2016; 17:28. [PMID: 27178188 PMCID: PMC4866041 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-016-0111-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2015] [Accepted: 05/09/2016] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Personalized medicine (PM) aims to tailor disease prevention, diagnosis, and treatment to individuals on the basis of their genes, lifestyle and environments. Patient and interest organizations (PIOs) may potentially play an important role in the realization of PM. This paper investigates the views and perspectives on PM of a variety of PIOs. Methods Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted among leading representatives of 13 PIOs located in Europe and North-America. The data collected were analysed using a conventional content analysis approach. Results The PIO representatives supported the realization of PM but feared that many financial, structural and organizational challenges may delay its realization. They encouraged strategies to modernize drug licencing mechanisms, develop research and data sharing infrastructures, and educate patients and health care professionals in PM. Notably, they emphasized the importance of developing PM in an equitable way and taking into consideration the patients’ needs, values and personal situation. Despite varying levels of awareness regarding PM, the PIO representatives expressed willingness to engage in the PM agenda and recommended that PIOs work closely with policy-makers to design PM in a way that truly addresses the needs and concerns of patients. Conclusions PIOs have the potential to become central drivers of the PM agenda. Collaborations should be further developed between PIOs, researchers, drug developers and health care authorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O Box 1130, Blindern, NO-0318, Oslo, Norway. .,Norwegian Cancer Genomics Consortium, kreftgenomikk.no, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Jennifer R Harris
- Department of Genetics and Bioinformatics, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Edwards KA, Terry SF, Gold D, Horn EJ, Schwartz M, Stuart M, Vernon SD. Realizing Our Potential in Biobanking: Disease Advocacy Organizations Enliven Translational Research. Biopreserv Biobank 2016; 14:314-8. [PMID: 27058463 DOI: 10.1089/bio.2015.0053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Biobanks are increasingly powerful tools used in translational research, and disease advocacy organizations (DAOs) are making their presence known as research drivers and partners. We examined DAO approaches to biobanking to inform how the enterprise of biobanking can grow and become even more impactful in human health. In this commentary, we outline overarching approaches from successful DAO biobanks. These lessons learned suggest principles that can create a more participant-centric approach and illustrate the key roles DAOs can play as partners in research initiatives. DAO approaches to biobanking for translational research include the following: be outcome driven; forge alliances that are unexpected-build bridges to enhance translation; come ready for success; be nimble, flexible, and adaptable; and remember that people matter. Each of these principles led to particular practices that have increased the translational impact of biobank collections. The research practices discussed can inform partnerships in all sectors going forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly A Edwards
- 1 Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington School of Medicine , Seattle, Washington
| | - Sharon F Terry
- 2 Genetic Alliance, Inc. , Washington, District of Columbia.,3 PXE International, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Dana Gold
- 4 University of Washington , Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Mary Schwartz
- 6 Pachyonychia Congenita Project, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Molly Stuart
- 7 Strategic Change Consultant, Davis, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Pinto D, Martin D, Chenhall R. The involvement of patient organisations in rare disease research: a mixed methods study in Australia. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2016; 11:2. [PMID: 26754025 PMCID: PMC4709899 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-016-0382-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2015] [Accepted: 01/04/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We report here selected findings from a mixed-methods study investigating the role of Australian rare disease patient organisations (RDPOs) in research. Despite there being many examples of RDPOs that have initiated and supported significant scientific advances, there is little information - and none at all in Australia - about RDPOs generally, and their research-related goals, activities, and experiences. This information is a pre-requisite for understanding what RDPOs bring to research and how their involvement could be strengthened. METHODS We reviewed 112 RDPO websites, conducted an online survey completed by 61 organisational leaders, and interviewed ten leaders and two key informants. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using basic descriptive statistics and content analysis, respectively. RESULTS Although most are small volunteer-based groups, more than 90% of the surveyed RDPOs had a goal to promote or support research on the diseases affecting their members. Nearly all (95 %) had undertaken at least one research-related activity - such as providing funding or other support to researchers - in the previous five years. However, RDPO leaders reported considerable challenges in meeting their research goals. Difficulties most frequently identified were insufficient RDPO resources, and a perceived lack of researchers interested in studying their diseases. Other concerns included inadequate RDPO expertise in governing research "investments", and difficulty engaging researchers in the organisation's knowledge and ideas. We discuss these perceived challenges in the light of two systemic issues: the proliferation of and lack of collaboration between RDPOs, and the lack of specific governmental policies and resources supporting rare disease research and patient advocacy in Australia. CONCLUSION This study provides unique information about the experiences of RDPOs generally, rather than experiences retrospectively reported by RDPOs associated with successful research. We describe RDPOs' valuable contributions to research, while also providing insights into the difficulties for small organisations trying to promote research. The study is relevant internationally because of what it tells us about RDPOs; however, we draw attention to specific opportunities in Australia to support RDPOs' involvement in research, for the benefit of current and future generations affected by rare diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deirdre Pinto
- Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
| | - Dominique Martin
- Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
| | - Richard Chenhall
- Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
The brain tumor community is a unique, underserved population that has not seen significant improvements in survival over the last four decades. In the search for effective treatments for brain tumors, nonprofit patient advocacy organizations identify and fill the gaps that the for-profit sector and the government have not addressed or cannot address. Although many articles have been written on the roles of patient advocacy groups in general, or in targeted areas such as clinical trial recruitment, none have looked at the brain tumor community specifically. This review looks at the literature on patient advocacy groups and provides specific examples of brain tumor advocacy organizations that offer these services. It examines the evolution of the role of these organizations over time, and how that has been reflected in the programs and services provided. This is a collaborative effort to highlight programs and services across multiple patient advocacy organizations.
Collapse
|