Head CT for nontrauma patients in the emergency department: clinical predictors of abnormal findings

COVID-19 and cancer risk arising from ionizing radiation exposure through CT scans: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The surge in the utilization of CT scans for COVID-19 diagnosis and monitoring during the pandemic is undeniable. This increase has brought to the forefront concerns about the potential long-term health consequences, especially radiation-induced cancer risk. This study aimed to quantify the potential cancer risk associated with CT scans performed for COVID-19 detection.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study data from a total of 561 patients, who were referred to the radiology center at Imam Hossein Hospital in Shahroud, was collected. CT scan reports were categorized into three groups based on the radiologist's interpretation. The BEIR VII model was employed to estimate the risk of radiation-induced cancer.

RESULTS

Among the 561 patients, 299 (53.3%) were males and the average age of the patients was 49.61 ± 18.73 years. Of the CT scans, 408 (72.7%) were reported as normal. The average age of patients with normal, abnormal, and potentially abnormal CT scans was 47.57 ± 19.06, 54.80 ± 16.70, and 58.14 ± 16.60 years, respectively (p-value < 0.001). The average effective dose was 1.89 ± 0.21 mSv, with 1.76 ± 0.11 mSv for males and 2.05 ± 0.29 mSv for females (p-value < 0.001). The average risk of lung cancer was 3.84 ± 1.19 and 9.73 ± 3.27 cases per 100,000 patients for males and females, respectively. The average LAR for all cancer types was 10.30 ± 6.03 cases per 100,000 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the critical issue of increased CT scan usage for COVID-19 diagnosis and the potential long-term consequences, especially the risk of cancer incidence. Healthcare policies should be prepared to address this potential rise in cancer incidence and the utilization of CT scans should be restricted to cases where laboratory tests are not readily available or when clinical symptoms are severe.

Evaluating the Necessity and Radiation Risk of Brain CT Scans Requested by the Trauma Emergency Department

Background

Numerous Computed Tomography (CT) scan requests for trauma patients have raised serious concern about the impacts of radiation such as radiation-induced cancers.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the necessity rate of requested head CT scans for traumatic patients and to ultimately estimate the risk of radiation-induced brain cancer.

Material and Methods

In this retrospective analytical study, traumatic patients, who had undergone a head CT scan in a two-month period from August 23 to October 22, 2018, were considered as the study population. Two radiologists reviewed each patient individually to evaluate the rate of normal and abnormal cases. Dose length product in milligrays (mGy) was utilized to calculate the effective dose (ED) in millisieverts (mSv), resulting in an assessment of the risk of radiation-induced brain cancer using ICRP 103.

Results

Among 523 scans, 460 patients (88%) received normal reviews, while only 47 patients (9%) had findings related to their current trauma. The mean effective dose value was 1.05±0.36 mSv. Risk of the radiation induced brain cancer was calculated to be 0.037 and 0.030 new cancer cases in 10000 males and females per Gy, respectively.

Conclusion

Final results demonstrated that a significant number of traumatic patients undergoing a CT scan are in fact, healthy. Such reckless usage of CT and consequently the excess exposure could result in a dramatic rise in cancer rates. The need to limit unnecessary CT scan usage and keeping the radiation given to patients as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) when collecting essential diagnostic data is more critical than ever.

Head computerized tomography in emergency department evaluation of the geriatric patient with generalized weakness

Objective

Weakness in older emergency department (ED) patients presents a broad differential. Evaluation of these patients can be challenging, and the efficacy of head computed tomography (CT) imaging is unclear. This study assesses the usefulness of head CT as a diagnostic study of acute generalized weakness in older ED patients.

Methods

This retrospective review of patients aged 65 years and older presenting to 2 community EDs included patients with a chief complaint of generalized weakness who received a head CT. Patients presenting with a focal neurologic complaint, altered mental status, or trauma were excluded. Variables evaluated included additional triage chief complaints, dementia diagnosis, and deficits on physical examination. Primary outcome was acute intracranial finding on head CT. Secondary outcomes included neurology consultation, neurosurgical consultation, and neurosurgical intervention.

Results

Of 247 patients, 3.2% had an acute intracranial abnormality on head CT. Emergent consultations for neurology and neurosurgery occurred for 1.6% and 2.4% of patients, respectively. None required neurosurgical intervention. Patients with objective weakness or focal neurologic deficits on physical examination were more likely to have acute findings on head CT (8.5% vs. 2.0%, odds ratio 4.56, confidence interval 1.10-18.95). Additional characteristics did not predict acute intracranial abnormality or need for emergent consultation.

Conclusion

Few patients with generalized weakness evaluated with head CT had acutely abnormal intracranial findings. Patients with objective weakness or neurologic deficits were more likely to have acute abnormalities. Although head CT is frequently used to evaluate geriatric weakness, its utility is low, especially in patients with normal physical examinations.

Diagnostic yield of CT head in delirium and altered mental status-A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

CT head is commonly performed in the setting of delirium and altered mental status (AMS), with variable yield. We aimed to evaluate the yield of CT head in hospitalized patients with delirium and/or AMS across a variety of clinical settings and identify factors associated with abnormal imaging.

METHODS

We included studies in adult hospitalized patients, admitted to the emergency department (ED) and inpatient medical unit (grouped together) or the intensive care unit (ICU). Patients had a diagnosis of delirium/AMS and underwent a CT head that was classified as abnormal or not. We searched Medline, Embase and other databases (informed by PRISMA guidelines) from inception until November 11, 2021. Studies that were exclusively performed in patients with trauma or a fall were excluded. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed; the pooled proportion of abnormal CTs was estimated using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was determined via the I² statistic. Factors associated with an abnormal CT head were summarized qualitatively.

RESULTS

Forty-six studies were included for analysis. The overall yield of CT head in the inpatient/ED was 13% (95% CI: 10.2%-15.9%) and in ICU was 17.4% (95% CI: 10%-26.3%), with considerable heterogeneity (I² 96% and 98% respectively). Heterogeneity was partly explained after accounting for study region, publication year, and representativeness of the target population. Yield of CT head diminished after year 2000 (19.8% vs. 11.1%) and varied widely depending on geographical region (8.4%-25.9%). The presence of focal neurological deficits was a consistent factor that increased yield.

CONCLUSION

Use of CT head to diagnose the etiology of delirium and AMS varied widely and yield has declined. Guidelines and clinical decision support tools could increase the appropriate use of CT head in the diagnostic etiology of delirium/AMS.

Ordering Characteristics Predictive of Noncontrast CT Head Positivity in the Emergency Department

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Recent decades have seen a steady increase in noncontrast head CT utilization in the emergency department with a concurrent rise in the practice of physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs). The goal of this study was to identify ordering and patient characteristics predictive of positive noncontrast head CTs in the ED. We hypothesized NP/PAs would have lower positivity rates compared to physicians, suggestive of relative overutilization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified ED patients who underwent noncontrast head CTs at a single institution: a nonlevel 1 trauma center, during a 7-year period, recording examination positivity, ordering provider training/experience, and multiple additional ordering/patient attributes. Exam positivity was defined as any intracranial abnormality necessitating a change in acute management, such as acute hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, herniation, or worsening prior findings.

RESULTS

6624 patients met inclusion criteria. 4.6% (280/6107) of physician exams were positive while 3.7% (19/517) of NP/PA exams were positive; however, differences were not significant. Increasing provider experience was not associated with positivity. Attributes with increased positivity were patient age (p < 0.001), daytime exam (p < 0.05), and indications regarding malignancy (p < 0.001) or focal neurologic deficit (p = 0.001). Attributes with decreased positivity were indications of trauma (p < 0.001) or vertigo/dizziness (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

We found no significant difference in rates of exam positivity between physicians and NP/PAs, even accounting for years of experience. This suggests increasing utilization of head CTs in the ED is not due to the increasing presence of NP/PAs, and may be reflective of general practice trends and clear diagnostic algorithms leading to head CT.

Diagnostic yield of emergency MRI in non-traumatic headache

PURPOSE

Non-traumatic headache is one of the most common neurological complaints in emergency departments. A relatively low diagnostic yield of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) among outpatients has been previously reported, but studies of emergency patients are lacking. We sought to determine the diagnostic yield of emergency MRI among outpatients presenting to the emergency department with non-traumatic headache.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed emergency MRI referrals in a tertiary hospital for non-traumatic headache over a five-year period. We recorded patient characteristics, relevant clinical information from the referrals, and imaging outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 696 emergency patients with non-traumatic headache underwent MRI, most within 24 h of presentation. Significant findings related to headache were found in 136 (20%) patients, and incidental findings in 22% of patients. In a multivariate model, the predisposing factors of the significant findings were age, smoking, nausea, and signs/symptoms of infection. The protective factors were numbness and history of migraine. A predictive clinical score reached only moderate performance.

CONCLUSION

Although emergency MRI shows headache-related findings in one in five patients, accurate prediction modeling remains a challenge, even with statistically significant predictors and a large sample size.

Evaluating the Outcome of an Unnecessary Request for CT Scan in Be'sat Hospital of Hamadan

Aim

This study aimed to investigate the frequency of unnecessary tests requested in Be'sat Hospital in Hamadan.

Materials and Methods

This descriptive research was conducted in order to investigate the frequency of unnecessary requests for CT scan and radiography of patients referring to the imaging department of Be'sat Hospital in Hamadan in a 4- to 6-month period. Patient information, including gender, age, type of CT scan test, the reason for requesting the test, the expertise of the requesting physician, and the result of the radiologist's report on each test, was extracted and collected.

Results

A total of 1000 CT scans were evaluated. The mean age of these patients was about 36 years and most of them were men. The highest and lowest percentages of unnecessary cases were related to CT scans of the brain (42.3%) and facial bones (2.3%), respectively. The most and the least unnecessary CT scans based on the reason given for the request were related to multiple physical trauma (30.7%) and chronic kidney disease (1.5%), respectively.

Conclusion

In all tests, over 74% of the reports were unnecessary and less than 26% were necessary. Therefore, it is necessary to reduce unnecessary requests to reduce the radiation dose of patients. Also, the knowledge of doctors should be increased in the field of appropriate evaluation of CT scan tests based on clinical guidelines.

Head computed tomography for elderly patients with acute altered mental status in the emergency setting: value for decision-making and predictors of abnormal findings

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the impact of head computed tomography (CT) on clinical decision-making about older adults with acute altered mental status (AMS) in the emergency department in terms of CT's diagnostic yield, emergency department length of stay, and changes in medical strategy. It also attempted to find predictors of an acute imaging abnormality.

METHODS

This was a 1-year, retrospective, single-center observational study of patients aged ≥75 years who underwent noncontrast head CT because of an isolated episode of AMS. The acute positive CT findings were ischemic strokes, hemorrhages, tumors, demyelinating lesions, hydrocephalus, and intracranial infections.

RESULTS

A total of 594 CTs were performed, of which 38 (6.4%) were positive. The main etiology of AMS was sepsis (29.1%). Changes in medical strategy were more common in patients with a positive CT, and the major changes were ordering additional neuro exams (odds ratio [OR], 95.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 38.4-233.8; P<0.001), adjusting treatments (OR, 12.2; 95% CI, 5.0-29.5; P<0.001), and referral to a neurologic unit (OR, 7.3; 95% CI, 3.0-17.5; P<0.01). Three factors were significantly associated with a positive outcome: Glasgow Coma Scale <13 (OR, 8.5; 95% CI, 2.3-28.9; P<0.001), head wound (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.1-8.2; P=0.025), and dehydration (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.4; P=0.021). For elderly patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale ≥13 and no head wound or clinical dehydration, the probability of a positive CT was 0.02 (95% CI, 0.01-0.04). Considering only those patients, the diagnostic yield fell to 1.7%.

CONCLUSION

In elderly patients, the causes of AMS are primarily extracerebral. Randomized clinical trials are needed to validate a clinical pathway for selecting patients who require emergent neuroimaging.

Use of Computed Tomography of the Head in Patients With Acute Atraumatic Altered Mental Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

The usefulness of computed tomography of the head (CTH) in patients with acute-onset atraumatic altered mental status (AMS) is poorly understood, but use in these patients remains high.

Objective

To evaluate the use of CTH (event rate) in patients with AMS and the positive outcome event rate of the performed CTH studies.

Data Sources

The PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched using predefined Boolean parameters. All studies that met inclusion criteria until January 31, 2022, were included.

Study Selection

Randomized clinical trials and observational, cohort, and case-control studies were included. Conference abstracts, reviews, letters, case reports, case series, systematic literature, and meta-analyses were excluded.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

The systematic literature review was performed per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Data were independently extracted by 2 authors. Data were pooled using a random-effects method.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Event rate of CTH use in patients with acute atraumatic AMS. The CTH event rates and positive CTH event rates were calculated with 95% CIs.

Results

Of 9338 studies identified, 26 qualified for the systematic review and 25 for the meta-analysis. The 25 studies in the meta-analysis included a total of 79 201 patients. The CTH event rate was 94% (proportion, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.76-1.00), and the positive CTH event rate was 11% (proportion, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.07-0.15). There was significant heterogeneity among the studies included (I2 > 50%, P < .001), for which a random-effects model was used. There was significant publication bias, as evident by an asymmetric funnel plot. There was no fluctuation of the results during the sensitivity analysis, which reassured the reliability of the data.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this meta-analysis, CTH use among patients with acute-onset atraumatic AMS was very high with a low yield. Large-scale studies are needed to guide clinical decision-making in such a situation.

Impact of abdominal imaging on the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis in patients with painless lipase elevation

Abdominal pain is considered a cardinal feature of acute pancreatitis (AP), and abdominal imaging is only required to diagnose AP when the pain is atypical, or serum enzyme elevation does not match the clinical picture. While painless lipase elevation is being increasingly associated with worse outcomes in various diseases, the diagnostic approach to such elevation is so-far unclear. We thus aimed to learn the impact of pain on the diagnosis of AP.

METHODS

All patients presenting to the Mayo Clinic Arizona Hospital emergency department with a serum lipase ≥3x upper limit of normal between April 2016 and January 2020 were prospectively followed. Their charts were reviewed for the nature of pain, serum lipase levels on presentation, abdominal imaging, and whether a diagnosis of AP was made. Chronic pancreatitis was excluded.

RESULTS

Among 320 patients, 85 (26.5%) had painless lipase elevation. These patients had abdominal imaging less often (56/85, 66%) than in those with abdominal pain (201/235, 83%; p = 0.001). The diagnosis of AP increased overall from 31/63 (49%) without imaging to 198/257 (77%) with imaging (P < 0.001). Imaging increased the diagnosis of AP in patients with painless lipase elevation from 2/29 (7%) without imaging to 16/56 (29%; p = 0.025) among those who were imaged.

CONCLUSIONS

Painless lipase elevation >3-fold the upper limit of normal is common in emergency department patients. 1/3 to 1/4 of these may have AP. Abdominal imaging increases the diagnosis of AP in patients with painless lipase elevation. Therefore, abdominal imaging in such patients may help detect AP that otherwise eludes diagnosis.

An audit of CT brain findings in adults with new-onset seizures in a resource restricted setting in South Africa

Background

Globally, adults presenting with seizures account for 1% – 2% of visits to emergency departments (EDs), of which 25% are new-onset seizures. Neuroimaging is essential as part of the initial workup. Multiple studies have demonstrated abnormal CT brain (CTB) findings in these patients.

Objectives

To review the CTB findings in adults presenting with new-onset seizures in a resource restricted setting.

Method

A retrospective review of 531 CTBs was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Gauteng on adults presenting to the ED with new-onset seizures.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 45.6 ± 17.1 years, and the male to female ratio was 1.2:1. Generalised and focal seizure types were almost equally represented. Of the total 531 patients, 168 (31.6%) were HIV positive. The CTB findings were abnormal in 257 (48.4%) patients, albeit vascular pathology accounted for 21.9%. Infective pathology accounted for 14.1% with a statistically significant association with HIV (p = 0.003). Trauma related pathology was 2.4%, whilst neoplastic pathology was seen in 3.0%. Other causes included congenital pathology, calcifications, atrophy and gliosis. Clinical factors associated with abnormal CTB findings were age ≥ 40 years, HIV infection, hypertension, focal seizures, low Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), raised cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein and presence of lymphocytes.

Conclusion

A high yield of abnormal CTB findings was noted in adult patients who presented with new-onset seizures, supporting the use of urgent CTB in patients with certain clinical risk factors. Patients without these risk factors can be scanned within 24–48 h in a resource restricted setting.

Validation of the ECHS non trauma cranial CT rule in Australia: A prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Computed tomography (CT) is a commonly used imaging modality in Emergency Departments (EDs), however its use is questionable in many low yield settings. The Emergency CT Head score (ECHS) is a recently published clinical tool that assists in stratifying the need for CT brain (CTB) for patients presenting without a history of trauma. We sought to validate this tool in an Australian ED setting.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated 412 patients who received CTB without a history of trauma at a large Australian ED. We assessed them for the 4 main ECHS data points: focal neurological deficit on physical examination, new acute onset headache, transient neurological deficit, and a combination of new onset seizures with an altered conscious state. We examined their association with acute and chronic CTB findings. We then applied the ECHS to our data, calculating its sensitivity and its appropriateness at this single site via the calculation of a receiver operating curve (ROC).

RESULTS

10.2% of all CTB performed were positive for an acute or chronic abnormality. Only sex (male) and focal motor deficit were independent predictors of positive CTB at univariate analysis. The ECHS did not perform as anticipated in our population, with a ROC area under the curve of 0.498. An ECHS score of >0, which has been proposed as the threshold to not require imaging, had sensitivity of only 83.3% in our population.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research and validation is required in order to safely implement the ECHS clinical score in the Australian ED setting.

Clinical Predictors of Abnormal Head Computed Tomography Findings in Non-trauma Patients Presenting to a South African Emergency Department

Background: Head computed tomography (head CT) examinations conducted at emergency departments (EDs) for non-trauma patients are expensive and expose patients to ionizing radiation. Identification of symptoms likely to yield abnormal head CT scans can reduce costs and prevent unnecessary patient irradiation. There is limited comprehensive data in the literature concerning the utilization of head CT in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) EDs. Methods: A retrospective study of successive non-contrasted head CT scans from February 2017 through January 2018 performed on non-trauma ED patients aged 18 years and above without known pre-existing intracranial pathology was conducted. Univariate and multivariate logistic models were used to determine which presenting clinical features were likely to yield abnormal head CT findings. Clinical information was obtained from the history and physical examination findings entered on the requisition form by the ED clinicians and from previous head CT reports if present on the picture archiving and communication system (PACS). Results: A total of 396 consecutive patients who received head CT examinations had a median age of 49 years (IQR: 36-53), and 53.3% were male (n = 211/396). Of the head CT scans included, 73.5% of head CTs included were abnormal (n = 291/396). Age >61 years (aOR:1.54; 95%CI: 1.12-2.10), focal neurologic deficit (aOR: 2.46; 95%CI: 1.42-4.26), and loss of consciousness (aOR 2.82; 95%CI: 1.21-6.57) were the predictors of abnormal head CT findings. Conclusion: A head CT scan in a non-trauma patient presenting to an emergency department in a low-middle income country like South Africa is likely to yield abnormal findings if a patient presented with age above 61 years, loss of consciousness, or focal neurological deficit.

Scenarios to improve CT head utilization in the emergency department delineated by critical results reporting

PURPOSE

Increasing use of advanced imaging in the emergency department (ED) has resulted in higher cost without better outcomes. Our goal was to evaluate the yield of CT head exams by scenario to guide efforts at improving patient selection.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study at an academic medical center over 4 years (1/1/2014-12/31/2017). The chief complaint, imaging order, and exam result text were obtained for all adult ED encounters. For the 50 most common chief complaints leading to CT head exams, the ratio of exams to total encounters and ratio of critical results to imaging studies were calculated. Significant difference in "yield" was assessed via binomial test.

RESULTS

Over 708,145 adult ED encounters, 58,783 CT head exams were ordered, with an overall critical result yield of 8.0%. The three most common chief complaints had higher yield (p < 0.05): altered mental status (9.8%), fall (9.7%), and new headache (10.1%). Lower yield (p < 0.05) was found for 19 chief complaints: dizziness (6.2%), falls in patients > 65 years old (7.1%), syncope (5.3%), seizure with known epilepsy (4.8%), chest pain (3.7%), head injury (4.9%), headache re-evaluation (7.0%), alcohol intoxication (2.5%), fatigue (6.5%), headache-recurrent or in the setting of known migraines (5.2%), hypertension (4.4%), lethargy (5.8%), loss of consciousness (5.3%), migraine (3.2%), psychiatric evaluation (2.9%), near syncope (4.6%), drug problem (3.1%), symptomatically decreased blood sugar (3.2%), and suicidal (1.7%).

CONCLUSION

Our study provides a priority list of low yield scenarios of CT head use for improvement of patient selection.

The Value of Cranial CT Imaging in Patients With Headache at the Emergency Department

Background: Headache is among the most prevalent complaints in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Clinicians are faced with the difficult task to differentiate primary (benign) from secondary headache disorders, since no international guidelines currently exist of clinical indicators for neuroimaging in headache patients.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 501 patients who presented at the ED with headache as a primary complaint between April 2018 and December 2018. Primary outcomes included the amount of diagnostic imaging, the different conclusions provided by diagnostic imaging, and the clinical factors associated with abnormal imaging results.

Results: About half of the patients were diagnosed with a primary headache disorder. Cranial CT imaging at the ED was performed regularly (61% of the patients) and led to the diagnosis of underlying pathology in 1 in 7.6 patients. In a multivariate model, factors significantly associated with abnormal cranial CT results were age 50 years or older, presentation within 1 h after headache onset, clinical history of aphasia, and focal neurological deficit at examination.

Conclusions: As separate clinical characteristics have limited value in detecting severe underlying headache disorders, cranial imaging is regularly performed in the ED. Clinical prediction model tools applied to headache patients may identify patients at risk of intracranial pathology prior to diagnostic imaging and reduce cranial imaging in the future.

Physicians' Risk Tolerance and Head Computed Tomography Use for Pediatric Patients With Minor Head Injury

OBJECTIVES

Traumatic brain injury is the leading cause of death and disability in children worldwide. The objective of this study was to determine the association between physician risk tolerance and head computed tomography (CT) use in patients with minor head injury (MHI) in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed pediatric patients (<17 years old) with MHI in the ED and then administered 2 questionnaires (a risk-taking subscale [RTS] of the Jackson Personality Inventory and a malpractice fear scale [MFS]) to attending physicians who had evaluated these patients and made decisions regarding head CT use. The primary outcome was head CT use during ED evaluation; the secondary outcome was ED length of stay and final diagnosis of intracranial injury (ICI).

RESULTS

Of 523 patients with MHI, 233 (44.6%) underwent brain CT, and 16 (3.1%) received a final diagnosis of ICI. Among the 16 emergency physicians (EPs), the median scores of the MFS and RTS were 22 (interquartile range, 17-26) and 23 (interquartile range, 19-25), respectively. Emergency physicians who were most risk averse tended to order more head CT scans compared with the more risk-tolerant EPs (56.96% vs 37.37%; odds ratio, 8.463; confidence interval, 2.783-25.736). The ED length of stay (P = 0.442 and P = 0.889) and final diagnosis (P = 0.155 and P = 0.835) of ICI were not significantly associated with the RTS and MFS scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Individual EP risk tolerance, as measured by RTS, was predictive of CT use in pediatric patients with MHI.

A comprehensive assessment of physical image quality of five different scanners for head CT imaging as clinically used at a single hospital centre-A phantom study

Nowadays, given the technological advance in CT imaging and increasing heterogeneity in characteristics of CT scanners, a number of CT scanners with different manufacturers/technologies are often installed in a hospital centre and used by various departments. In this phantom study, a comprehensive assessment of image quality of 5 scanners (from 3 manufacturers and with different models) for head CT imaging, as clinically used at a single hospital centre, was hence carried out. Helical and/or sequential acquisitions of the Catphan-504 phantom were performed, using the scanning protocols (CTDI_vol range: 54.7–57.5 mGy) employed by the staff of various Radiology/Neuroradiology departments of our institution for routine head examinations. CT image quality for each scanner/acquisition protocol was assessed through noise level, noise power spectrum (NPS), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), modulation transfer function (MTF), low contrast detectability (LCD) and non-uniformity index analyses. Noise values ranged from 3.5 HU to 5.7 HU across scanners/acquisition protocols. NPS curves differed in terms of peak position (range: 0.21–0.30 mm^-1). A substantial variation of CNR values with scanner/acquisition protocol was observed for different contrast inserts. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation divided by mean value) of CNR values across scanners/acquisition protocols was 18.3%, 31.4%, 34.2%, 30.4% and 30% for teflon, delrin, LDPE, polystyrene and acrylic insert, respectively. An appreciable difference in MTF curves across scanners/acquisition protocols was revealed, with a coefficient of variation of f_50%/f_10% of MTF curves across scanners/acquisition protocols of 10.1%/7.4%. A relevant difference in LCD performance of different scanners/acquisition protocols was found. The range of contrast threshold for a typical object size of 3 mm was 3.7–5.8 HU. Moreover, appreciable differences in terms of NUI values (range: 4.1%-8.3%) were found. The analysis of several quality indices showed a non-negligible variability in head CT imaging capabilities across different scanners/acquisition protocols. This highlights the importance of a physical in-depth characterization of image quality for each CT scanner as clinically used, in order to optimize CT imaging procedures.

Evaluating and managing severe headache in the emergency department

Introduction: Headache is the fifth most common reason to visit an emergency department (ED). In most of the cases, headache is benign and has a primary origin, with migraine as the most common diagnosis. Inappropriate use of ED for non-emergency conditions causes overcrowding, unnecessary testing, and increased medical costs.Areas covered: All stages of headache management in ED, from the reasons to go there, the diagnosis that is made and the investigations necessary to make it, to get to the therapies administered and those prescribed at discharge, if there were any. Finally, the authors evaluated the habit of recommending medical follow-up and how often the headache is still present at discharge or returns within 24 hours.Expert Opinion: Primary headaches are underdiagnosed, misdiagnosed, and the majority do not receive drug therapy either in ED or on discharge, and in cases where the therapy is prescribed is not specific. Increase the number of primary care medical services, spread the 'headaches culture' among GPs and ED doctors, the adoption of ICHD in the diagnostic protocols used in EDs and a fast referral to a headache center could decrease the inappropriate use of ED and improve the headache management in the emergency units.

Ultrafast Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute Neurological Emergencies: Diagnostic Accuracy and Impact on Patient Management

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate diagnostic accuracy and impact on patient management of an ultrafast (4:33 minutes/5 sequences) brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol for the detection of intracranial pathologies in acute neurological emergencies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four hundred forty-nine consecutive emergency patients with acute nontraumatic neurological symptoms were evaluated for this institutional review board-approved prospective single-center trial. Sixty patients (30 female, 30 male; mean age, 61 years) with negative head CT were included and underwent emergency brain MRI at 3 T subsequent to CT. MRI included the ultrafast protocol (ultrafast-MRI; sag T1 GRE, ax T2 TSE, ax T2 TSE Flair, ax T2* EPI-GRE, ax DWI SS-EPI; TA, 5 minutes) and an equivalent standard-length protocol (TA, 15 minutes) as reference standard. Two blinded board-certified neuroradiologists independently analyzed the MRI with regard to image quality (1, nondiagnostic; 2, substantial artifacts; 3, satisfactory; 4, minor artifacts; 5, no artifacts) and intracranial pathologies. Sensitivity and specificity for the detection of intracranial pathologies were calculated accordingly.

RESULTS

Ninety-three additional intracranial lesions (acute ischemia, n = 21; intracranial hemorrhage/microbleeds, n = 27; edema, n = 2; white matter lesion, n = 38; chronic infarction, n = 3; others, n = 2) were detected by ultrafast-MRI, whereas 101 additional intracranial lesions were detected by the standard-length protocol (acute ischemia, n = 24; intracranial hemorrhage/microbleeds, n = 32; edema, n = 2; white matter lesion, n = 38; chronic infarction, n = 3; others, n = 2). Image quality was equivalent to the standard-length protocol. Ultrafast-MRI demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, 0.939 [0.881-0.972]; specificity, 1.000 [0.895-1.000]) for the detection of intracranial pathologies. MRI led to a change in patient management in 10% compared with the initial CT.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrafast-MRI enables time-optimized diagnostic workup in acute neurological emergencies at high sensitivity and specificity compared with a standard-length protocol, with direct impact on patient management. Ultrafast MRI protocols are a powerful tool in the emergency setting and may be implemented on various scanner types based on the optimization of individual acquisition parameters.

Yield of head CT for acute findings in patients presenting to the emergency department

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to evaluate the yield of head CT in the ED in different age groups and different referral indications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Records of one large academic tertiary care ED were retrospectively reviewed for consecutive adult patients who underwent a head CT between January 1st 2017 and February 10th 2017. CT referral forms and interpretations were obtained and evaluated for demographics, referral indications, and findings. Scans were divided into three groups: acute findings, chronic findings, and normal. The cohort was divided into three age groups. Associations between referral indications and acute findings were calculated.

RESULTS

Overall, 1536 of adult patients with ED head CT were included. Acute findings were found in 239/1536 (15.5%) of the CTs. The frequency of acute findings increased with age (p = 0.027). The most common acute findings were brain hemorrhage (32.6%), infarct (27.6%), and mass (23%). The top three referral indications were focal neurologic deficit (28%), trauma (24.7%), and headache (17.5%). The rates of positive acute findings for different referral indications were seizure 27%, confusion 20%, syncope 19%, focal neurologic deficit 16%, head injury 15%, headache 12%, and dizziness 8%.

CONCLUSION

This study shows the yield of ED head CT for acute findings for different age groups and for different referral indications. The frequency of acute findings increased with age. Suspected seizure had the highest association with an acute finding, whereas dizziness had the lowest association.

Brain CT requests from emergency department: reality

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the most common reasons for requesting brain CT studies from the emergency department and to calculate the prevalence of urgent acute pathology on this population group.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We reviewed brain CT studies requested from the emergency department during October and November 2018. We recorded the following variables: age, sex, reason for requesting the study, CT findings, use of contrast agents and reasons for using them, and, in patients who had undergone previous head CT studies, whether the findings had changed. SPSS was used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 507 urgent brain CT studies were done (41.4% in men, 58.6% in women; mean age, 65.4±20 years). The most common reason for requesting the study was head trauma (40.5%); only 15.6% of these studies showed acute posttraumatic intracranial lesions. The second most common reason was focal neurologic symptoms (16%); only 16% of these studies showed recent ischemic infarcts or acute bleeding. No pathological findings were reported in 43.2% of the studies. The most common abnormal finding was small vessel disease (20%). Space-occupying lesions (both benign and malignant) were found in 3.9% of all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Most brain CT studies requested from the emergency department showed no findings that would modify the management of the patient. Overuse of urgent brain CT increases the radiology department's workload and exposes patients to radiation unnecessarily.

Neuroimaging of first seizure in the adult emergency patients

The aim is to establish the role of head computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in adults presenting to the emergency department (ED) with first-time seizure (FS) and to analyze the potential predictor variables for the adverse imaging outcome. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all adults who underwent cranial CT or MRI between January 1, 2011, and December 1, 2016, to an academic ED for FS. Patients were excluded if were under 18 years of age, had known recent intracranial pathology, known brain tumor or having a history of trauma. Important predictive variables to indicate pathology in either CT or MR scan in patients with FS were evaluated with logistic regression analysis. A total of 546 FS (293 men and 253 women; range, 18-81 years; mean, 47 years) were identified in patients receiving either cranial CT or MR scan. Of them, abnormal findings were observed in 22/451 (4.8%) patients on CT and 18/95 (18.9%) patients on MRI. Predictor variables of age greater than 50 years, focal neurologic deficit, hypoglycemia, and history of malignancy were identified on CT, whereas a history of malignancy, age greater than 50 years and focal neurological deficit were determined on MRI. Limiting neuroimaging to this population would potentially reduce head CT scans by 67% and would potentially reduce head MRI scans by 47%. Clinical suspicion should be heightened and the neuroimaging should be considered for advanced age, history of malignancy, hypoglycemia or focal neurological deficits in patients with FS.

Rapid referral for headache management from emergency department to headache centre: four years data

BACKGROUND

Headache is one of the most common reason for medical consultation to emergency department (ED). The inappropriate use of ED for non-emergency conditions is a problem in terms of overcrowding of emergency facilities, unnecessary testing and treatment, increased medical costs, burden on medical service providers and weaker relationships between patient and primary care provider. The aim of this study was to analyze the different stages of ED management of headache to identify those deficiencies that can be overcome by a fast referral to a headache clinic.

METHODS

The study is a retrospective analysis of the electronic medical records of patients discharged from an academic ED between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018 and referred to the tertiary level headache centre of the same hospital. We analyzed all aspects related to the permanence in ED and also assessed whether there was a match between the diagnosis made in ED and ours.

RESULTS

Among our sample of 244 patients, 76.2% were admitted as "green tag", 75% underwent a head computed tomography, 19.3% received a neurological consultation, 43% did not receive any pharmacological treatment and 62.7% still had headache at discharge. The length of stay in ED was associated with reporting the first aura ever (p = 0.014) and whether patients received consultations (p < 0.001). The concordance analysis shown a significant moderate agreement only for the diagnosis of migraine and only between triage and headache centre.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients who went to ED complaining of headache received the same treatment regardless of their diagnosis and in many cases the headache had not yet resolved at the time of discharge. Given the many shortcomings in headache management in ED, rapid referral to the headache centre is of paramount importance to help the patient achieve a definiteve diagnosis and appropriate treatment.

Validation of clinical criteria for referral to head imaging in the neurologic emergency setting

BACKGROUND

In recent decades, diagnostic imaging became an important generator of large increases in medical spending. Inappropriate head CT referrals also increase population irradiation and unnecessarily burden and frighten patients.

OBJECTIVE

To validate previously proposed clinical criteria for referral to head imaging (age > 55 years, focal neurological deficit, changed mental state, nausea or vomiting, coagulation disorder, cancer) in a setting of emergency neurological service.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed electronic records of 500 consecutive referrals to neurological emergency and 500 referrals to emergency head imaging. In patients with several referrals, only results of the first evaluation were further analyzed. We calculated relations between clinical predictors, referrals, and findings of head imaging.

RESULTS

Of 486 first referrals of consecutive patients, 216 (44%) were referred to the emergency, and 100 (21%) to non-emergency head imaging. Remaining 170 (35%) were not referred to head imaging. Clinical predictors of pathologic head imaging fulfilled 77%, 41%, and 43% of patients, respectively. Pathologic head imaging had 153 of 490 (31%) referred patients. Referral criteria fulfilled 146 (sensitivity 95%) of them. Intracranial pathology was found in 7 of 125 patients not fulfilling referral criteria (negative predictive value 94%): 3 reported transient neurological symptoms, 2 sudden headache, and 2 headache with nausea and vomiting.

CONCLUSION

We confirmed utility of previously proposed clinical criteria for referral to head CT in emergency neurological setting. In addition, we found transient neurological symptoms, sudden severe headache, and headache with nausea or vomiting as additional independent indications for emergency head imaging.

Clinical decision rule for non-traumatic computed tomography of the brain

OBJECTIVE

The aims of the present study were to derive and validate a clinical decision rule (CDR) to rule out the need for computed tomography of the brain (CTB) in non-traumatic patients who present to the ED.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of non-traumatic patients who presented to the EDs in two urban hospitals and received CTB from January 2014 to December 2016. Data from one hospital were used to develop a CDR for clinically significant CTB findings. Clinically significant CTB findings were defined as acute infarction, intracranial neoplasm, intracranial haemorrhage, acute hydrocephalus, cerebral oedema and intracranial infection. Patients from another hospital were used as a validation cohort to evaluate the CDR and compare it to four previously derived CDRs.

RESULTS

There were 5296 cases in the derivation cohort, with 345 (6.5%) clinically significant CTB findings. Identified risk factors were: focal neurological deficit (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6-4.4), Glasgow Coma Scale <15 (adjusted OR 3.5, 95% CI 2.6-4.6), history of malignancy (adjusted OR 3.2, 95% CI 2.4-4.2), nausea and/or vomiting (adjusted OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.1), headache (adjusted OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and coagulopathy (adjusted OR 9.2, 95% CI 2.1-41.5). These criteria and four pre-existing CDRs were applied to the validation cohort of 5098 patients from the second hospital, which had 338 (6.6%) clinically significant CTB findings. Our criteria were found to have a sensitivity of 99.7% (95% CI 99.1-100.0) and a specificity of 11.0% (95% CI 10.1-11.9). The risk of having a clinically significant CTB finding is 0.3% if patients do not meet any of the criteria.

CONCLUSION

The CDR derived in the present study achieved the highest sensitivity and a moderate specificity when compared with four other pre-existing CDRs for non-traumatic brain injury patients.

Discrepancies in interpretation of night-time emergency computed tomography scans by radiology residents

Background

In many emergency radiology units, most of the night-time work is performed by radiology residents. Residents’ preliminary reports are typically reviewed by an attending radiologist. Accordingly, it is known that discrepancies in these preliminary reports exist.

Purpose

To evaluate the quality of night-time computed tomography (CT) interpretations made by radiology residents in the emergency department.

Material and Methods

Retrospectively, 1463 initial night-time CT interpretations given by a radiology resident were compared to the subspecialist’s re-interpretation given the following weekday. All discrepancies were recorded and classified into different groups regarding their possible adverse effect for the emergency treatment. The rate of discrepancies was compared between more and less experienced residents and between different anatomical regions.

Results

The overall rate of misinterpretations was low. In 2.3% (33/1463) of all night-time CT interpretations, an important and clinically relevant diagnosis was missed. No fatalities occurred due to CT misinterpretations during the study. The total rate of discrepancies including clinically irrelevant findings such as anatomical variations was 12.2% (179/1463). Less experienced residents were more likely to miss the correct diagnosis than more experienced residents (18.3% vs. 10.9%, odds ratio [OR] = 1.82, P = 0.001). Discrepancies were more common in body CT interpretations than in neurological CTs (18.1% vs. 9.1%, OR = 2.30, P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The rate of clinically important misinterpretations in CT examinations by radiology residents was found to be low. Experience helps in lowering the rate of misinterpretations.

A new clinical score for cranial CT in ED non-trauma patients: Definition and first validation

INTRODUCTION

Well recognized guidelines are available for the use of cranial computed tomography (CCT) in traumatic patients, while no definitely accepted standards exists to for CCT in patients without history of head injury. The aim of this study is to propose an easy clinical score to stratify the need of CCT in emergency department (ED) patients with suspect non-traumatic intracranial pathology.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients presenting to the ED for neurological deficit, postural instability, acute headache, altered mental status, seizures, confusion, dizziness, vertigo, syncope, and pre-syncope. We build a score for positive CCT prediction by using a logistic regression model on clinical factors significant at univariate analysis. The score was validated on a population of prospectively observed patients.

RESULTS

We reviewed clinical data of 1156 patients; positivity of CCT was 15.2%. Persistent neurological deficit, new onset acute headache, seizures and/or altered state of consciousness, and transient neurological disorders were independent predictors of positive CCT. We observed 508 patients in a validation prospective cohort; CCT was positive in 11.3%. Our score performed well in validation population with a ROC AUC of 0.787 (CI 95% 0.748-0.822). Avoiding CT in score 0 patients would have saved 82 (16.2%) exams. No patients with score 0 had a positive CCT findings; score sensitivity was 100.0 (CI 95% 93.7-100.0).

CONCLUSIONS

A score for risk stratification of patients with suspect of intra-cranial pathology could reduce CT request in ED, avoiding a significant number of CCT while minimizing the risk of missing positive results.

The effect of peer influence on the use of CT by emergency physicians for patients with headaches

BACKGROUND

It is challenging for emergency physicians (EPs) to distinguish between patients with life-threatening and benign headaches. We examined the effect of peer influence on computed tomography use by EPs for patients with headache and evaluated the peer influence effect in EPs with different levels of risk tolerance.

METHODS

We conducted a before- and after-retrospective case review, and administered the Risk-Taking subscale of the Jackson Personality Index to attending physicians. Each EP computed tomography (CT) use rate, patient number, and CT use, were e-mailed every two months to enhance EP team norm and establish a trend in behavior.

RESULTS

Of the 665 (before intervention) and 669 (after intervention) patients with headache, 206 (31%) and 171 (25.6%) underwent brain CT scans, respectively. Decreased use of CT examination was found in the post-intervention group (OR = 0.758, 95% CI: 0.593-0.967), especially for most risk-tolerant physicians (OR = 0.530, 95% CI: 0.311-0.889). There was prolonged ED length of stay (LOS) in the pre-intervention group (OR = 51.52, 95% CI: 26.998-76.050).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed that peer influence is an effective way to improve CT use rate and emergency department LOS for patients with isolated headache, especially for most risk-tolerant physicians. These findings could enhance the development of appropriate guidelines to assist ED physicians' CT use.

Stroke Mimics: The Quest for Leptomeningeal Anastomoses and Isolated Diffusion-Weigthed MR Signal

Stroke is caused by occlusion of a medium- or large-sized vessel in the brain. The treatment with either intravenous or intra-arterial thrombolysis is based on an accurate and time-sensitive diagnosis. On clinical and imaging grounds a number of entities-seizures, toxic-metabolic, infectious, or demyelinating diseases-can mimic stroke. Identifying them is paramount as the treatment differs significantly. Prior imaging reviews have focused on the nonterritorial distribution of these mimics. However, some important questions arise here. Are the vascular territories and their boundaries invariable in the human brain? Where should we draw the lines separating arterial territories? van der Zwan and colleagues addressed these questions decades ago. For him and others, the leptomeningeal anastomoses-a contentious concept for some but increasingly linked to collateral flow in stroke-is an important anatomic structure with significant variations in their distribution and pathophysiology. Variations in blood supply appear larger that traditionally taught. We revisit this concept and entertained their implications in cases of stroke mimics. For instance, the distribution of abnormalities in some toxic-metabolic processes appear to correlate with areas where rich leptomeningeal anastomoses are expected. We will also explore the concept of hyperintense signal on diffusion weighted-imaging with no correlated changes on apparent diffusion coefficient maps. We name this finding as "isolated DWI signal" and lay-out its importance in the recognition of many entities mimicking stroke. Taking together, the discussed anatomic and imaging concepts will help radiologists and clinicians to recognize not only the common but the unusual entities imitating stroke in the emergency room.

Predictor variables of abnormal imaging findings of syncope in the emergency department

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to describe the pathological findings and to analyze clinical predictors of abnormal imaging findings in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with syncope.

METHODS

The database was retrospectively reviewed for all patients who underwent cranial computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), having the symptom of syncope. Patients were included only if they were from the emergency department and excluded if were under 18 years of age, had known recent intracranial pathology, known brain tumor, or having a history of trauma. The primary outcome was assumed as abnormal head CT or MRI including intracranial hemorrhage, acute or subacute stroke, and newly diagnosed brain mass. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was utilized to determine the association between clinical variables and any significant pathology in either CT or MR scan.

RESULTS

Total of 1230 syncope (717 men and 513 women; range, 18-92 years; mean, 54.5 years) as presenting symptoms were identified in patients receiving either cranial CT or MR scan in the ED. Abnormal findings related to the syncope were observed in 47 (3.8%) patients. The following predictor variables were found to be significantly correlated with acutely abnormal head CT and MRI: a focal neurologic deficit, history of malignancy, hypertension, and age greater than 60 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data offer that the identification of predictor variables has a potential to decrease the routine use of head CT and MRI in patients admitting to the ED with syncope.

[Acute focal neurological deficits in the emergency room]

A focal neurological deficit with sudden onset or rapid progression is an alarming symptom indicating a neurological disorder with often urgent need for treatment. Particularly in the emergency room, where time and resources are limited, it is necessary to rapidly assign such a focal neurological deficit to a certain syndrome and to define a suspected diagnosis in order to execute the correct diagnostics and emergency therapy. In this article, we highlight frequent and typical neurological disorders presenting in the emergency room and their corresponding focal neurological deficits. The article and a suggested algorithm are to guide less-experienced colleagues to find quick steps from acute symptoms to diagnosis and emergency treatment of frequent and relevant neurological disorders in the emergency room.

Role of computed tomography at a cancer center emergency department

To evaluate the imaging methods used at the emergency department (ED) of a cancer center, with emphasis on computed tomography (CT). A descriptive, retrospective, single-center study was conducted by reviewing imaging exams and medical records, after approval of the institution's Ethics Review Board. The demographic data, cancer history, and imaging exam requested were evaluated for all patients and the indications and results of head, chest, and abdominopelvic CT scans were also evaluated. During the study period, there were 8710 visits to the ED, and 5999 imaging studies were requested in 3788 patients (43.5 % of total of visits). One thousand eight hundred twenty-nine CT exams were used in 1121 visits (12.9 % of total of visits). The mean age of patients was 57.7 years and most patients (93.2 %) had a known primary tumor. The most common indications for abdominopelvic CT were non-oncologic emergencies (26.7 %) and postoperative complications (19.2 %), and the results were negative in 36.6 %, positive for clinical suspicion in 49.0 %, and incidental positive in 14.5 %. The most frequent indication for chest CT was suspected pulmonary embolism (34.4 %); however, only 11.1 % confirmed the diagnosis. The results of head TC were negative in 72.9 % and the indications that had more positive findings were suspected metastasis (32.1 %) and focal neurological sign/altered level of consciousness (24.5 %). CT plays an important role in driving the cancer patients visiting the ED. However, the high rate of negative or discordant results causes a concern for the inadvertent and excessive use of this imaging modality.

Reevaluating the Utility of Maxillary Sinus Opacification as a Screening Tool for Facial Bone Fracture a Decade After Its Original Analysis

In 1997, Lambert and colleagues demonstrated that the absence of sinus fluid on head CT essentially excludes a fracture involving the sinus walls. Our purpose is to reevaluate this association utilizing the current standard of imaging technology. With improved image resolution, we aim to reassess whether the sensitivity and specificity of the “clear sinus sign” are improved or worsened. Furthermore, the current standard of care is to obtain a CT of the facial bones along with a head CT when facial trauma is suspected, so we also analyzed the association of the "clear sinus sign" with nasal bone and mandible fractures. We identified 629 facial bone CT scans performed on adult patients in the emergency department between July 2012 and May 2013. They were retrospectively analyzed by three reviewers for the presence of facial bone fracture and/or fluid opacification of at least one paranasal sinus (as defined by either complete sinus opacification or an air-fluid level - circumferential mucosal thickening was considered the absence of fluid). We found that sinus opacification was 98.8% specific for facial bone fracture but only 44.7% sensitive. However, for complex facial fractures, such as zygomaticomaxillary complex, orbital, and sinus fractures, the lack of sinus fluid is significantly more sensitive at 91%. Therefore, our results for complex facial fractures are congruent with those of the previous studies conducted by Lambert, et al. and Lewandowski, et al. However, we also demonstrate that sinus opacification is not specific for nasal bone or mandibular fractures.  

Same-Day Sinus and Brain CT Imaging in the Medicare Population: Are Practice Patterns Changing in Association with Medicare Policy Initiatives?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Monitoring the frequency of same-day sinus and brain CT (Outpatient Measure 14, "OP-14") is part of a recent large Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services hospital outpatient quality initiative to improve imaging efficiency. This study investigates patient-level claims data in the Medicare population focusing on where same-day sinus and brain CT imaging is performed and how the frequency of same-day studies changed with time before and during OP-14 measure program implementation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Research Identifiable Files were used to identify all sinus and brain CT examinations from 2004 through 2012 for a 5% random patient sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. Overall and site of service use rates were calculated for same- and non-same-day examinations. Changes were mapped to policy initiative timetables.

RESULTS

The number of same-day sinus and brain CT studies from 2004 to 2012 increased 67% from 1.85 (95% CI, 1.78-1.91) per 1000 Medicare beneficiaries in 2004 to 3.08 (95% CI, 3.00-3.15) in 2012. The biggest driver of increased same-day studies was the emergency department setting, from 0.56 (95% CI, 0.53-0.60) per 1000 to 1.78 (95% CI, 1.72-1.84; +215.7%). Overall use of brain CT from 146.0 (95% CI, 145.1-146.9) per 1000 to 176.3 (95% CI, 175.4-177.2; +21%) and sinus CT from 12.6 (95% CI, 12.4-12.8) per 1000 to 15.4 (95% CI, 15.2-15.6; +22%) increased until 2009 and remained stable through 2012.

CONCLUSIONS

Previously increasing same-day sinus and brain CT in Medicare beneficiaries plateaued in 2009, coinciding with the implementation of targeted measures by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Same-day imaging continues to increase in the emergency department setting.

Clinical scoring system may improve yield of head CT of non-trauma emergency department patients

The positive rate of head CT in non-trauma patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) is low. Currently, indications for imaging are based on the individual experience of the treating physician, which contributes to overutilization and variability in imaging utilization. The goals of this study are to ascertain the predictors of positive head CT in non-trauma patients and demonstrate feasibility of a clinical scoring algorithm to improve yield. We retrospectively reviewed 500 consecutive ED non-trauma patients evaluated with non-contrast head CT after presenting with headache, altered mentation, syncope, dizziness, or focal neurologic deficit. Medical records were assessed for clinical risk factors: focal neurologic deficit, altered mental status, nausea/vomiting, known malignancy, coagulopathy, and age. Data was analyzed using logistic regression and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and three derived algorithms. Positive CTs were found in 51 of 500 patients (10.2 %). Only two clinical factors were significant: focal neurologic deficit (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 20.7; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 9.4-45.7) and age >55 (adjusted OR 3.08; CI 1.44-6.56). Area under the ROC curve for all three algorithms was 0.73-0.83. In proposed algorithm C, only patients with focal neurologic deficit (major risk factor) or ≥2 of the five minor risk factors (altered mental status, nausea/vomiting, known malignancy, coagulopathy, and age) would undergo CT imaging. This may reduce utilization by 34 % with only a small decrease in sensitivity (98 %). Our simple scoring algorithm utilizing multiple clinical risk factors could help to predict the non-trauma patients who will benefit from CT imaging, resulting in reduced radiation exposure without sacrificing sensitivity.