Diagnostic Performance of Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced Liver MR Imaging versus Multidetector CT in the Detection of Dysplastic Nodules and Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Common pitfalls and diagnostic challenges in the application of LI-RADS CT/MRI algorithms: a comprehensive review

The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) was developed to standardize the interpretation and reporting of liver observations in at-risk populations, aiding in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite its advantages, the application of LI-RADS can be challenging due to the complexity of liver pathology and imaging interpretation. This comprehensive review highlights common pitfalls encountered in LI-RADS application and offers practical strategies to enhance diagnostic accuracy and consistency among radiologists. Key areas of difficulty include misapplication in non-high-risk populations, misinterpretation of major imaging features such as arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout, and incorrect application of ancillary features. Additionally, the review addresses challenges related to atypical HCC presentations and HCC mimics. By recognizing and addressing these pitfalls, radiologists can improve diagnostic accuracy and avoid common mistakes in the diagnosis of HCC.

New strategy of LI-RADS v2018 to improve the sensitivity for small hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 3.0 cm on extracellular-contrast enhanced MRI

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to modify LI-RADS version 2018 to improve sensitivity and determine the value of the combination of high alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels for small HCC (sHCC, ≤ 30 mm) diagnosis.

METHODS

A total of 984 patients at high risk for HCC, with 1204 observations (including 997 small observations ≤ 30 mm), who underwent extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI were enrolled from five independent centers. Blinded readers evaluated the LI-RADS features and categorized each observation according to the LI-RADS v2018, modified LI-RADS and EASL. Odds ratios of LI-RADS major features (MFs) and several high AFP levels for sHCC diagnosis were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. The modified LR-5 criteria was developed by including no APHE at any size with two MFs, and non-rim APHE with one MF (≥ 10 mm) or with two MFs (< 10 mm). The diagnostic performance of each version of the LR-5 was compared using generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

APHE, washout, enhancing capsule and five high AFP levels were independently associated with sHCC. In three datasets, the modified LI-RADS had higher sensitivities for sHCC (76.8 ∼ 85.5 % vs. 73.7 ∼ 75.9 %, P < 0.05) to the LR-5 v2018. The modified LI-RADS with AFP ≥ 200 ng/mL as an additional feature or as an alternative to threshold growth provided higher sensitivities for sHCC than LI-RADS v2018 (82.1 ∼ 90.1 % vs. 73.7 ∼ 75.9 %, all P < 0.05), modified LI-RADS (82.1 ∼ 90.1 % vs. 76.8 ∼ 85.5 %, all P < 0.05) and EASL version 2018 (82.1 ∼ 90.1 % vs. 73.3 ∼ 74.7 %, all P < 0.05), with comparable specificities (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The new strategy of LI-RADS v2018 provides significantly higher sensitivity and comparable specificity than those of LI-RADS v2018 for sHCC diagnosis on ECA-MRI.

Performance of LI-RADS category 5 vs combined categories 4 and 5: a systemic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS, LR) category 5 has high specificity and modest sensitivity for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of LR-5 vs combined LR-4 and LR-5 (LR-4/5) for HCC diagnosis.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through January 03, 2023 were searched for studies reporting the performance of LR-5 and combined LR-4/5 for HCC diagnosis, using CT/MRI LI-RADS version 2014, 2017, or 2018. A bivariate random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled per-observation diagnostic performance. Subgroup analysis was performed based on imaging modalities and type of MRI contrast material.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine studies (15,108 observations, 9928 (65.7%) HCCs) were included. Compared to LR-5, combined LR-4/5 showed significantly higher pooled sensitivity (83.0% (95% CI [80.3-85.8%]) vs 65.7% (95% CI [62.4-69.1%]); p < 0.001), lower pooled specificity (75.0% (95% CI [70.5-79.6%]) vs 91.7% (95% CI [90.2-93.1%]); p < 0.001), lower pooled positive likelihood ratio (3.60 (95% CI [3.06-4.23]) vs 6.18 (95% CI [5.35-7.14]); p < 0.001), and lower pooled negative likelihood ratio (0.22 (95% CI [0.19-0.25]) vs 0.38 (95% CI [0.35-0.41]) vs; p < 0.001). Similar results were seen in all subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis showed that combining LR-4 and LR-5 would increase sensitivity but decrease specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio. These findings may inform management guidelines and individualized management.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

This meta-analysis estimated the magnitude of changes in the sensitivity and specificity of imaging criteria when LI-RADS categories 4 and 5 were combined; these findings can inform management guidelines and individualized management.

KEY POINTS

There is no single worldwide reporting system for liver imaging, partly due to regional needs. Combining LI-RADS categories 4 and 5 increased sensitivity and decreased specificity and positive and negative likelihood ratios. Changes in the sensitivity and specificity of imaging criteria can inform management guidelines and individualized management.

Value of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of LR‑3 and LR-4 lesions coexisting with hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To explore which preoperative clinical data and conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features may indicate the presence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in HCC patients coexisting with LR-3 and LR-4 lesions.

METHODS

HCC Patients coexisting with LR-3 and LR-4 lesions who participated in a prospective clinical trial (XX) were included in this study. Two radiologists independently assessed the preoperative MRI features and each lesion was assigned according to the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS). The preoperative clinical data were also evaluated. The relative values of these parameters were assessed as potential predictors of HCC for coexisting LR-3 and LR-4 lesions.

RESULTS

We enrolled 102 HCC patients (58.1 ± 11.5 years; 84.3% males) coexisting with 110 LR-3 and LR-4 lesions (HCCs group [n = 66]; non-HCCs group [n = 44]). The presence of restricted diffusion (OR: 18.590, p < 0.001), delayed enhancement (OR: 0.113, p < 0.001), and mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity (OR: 3.084, p = 0.048) were found to be independent predictors of HCC diagnosis. The sensitivity and specificity of the above independent variables for the diagnosis of HCC ranged from 66.7 to 80.3% and 56.8 to 88.6%, respectively. ROC analysis showed that, in discriminating HCC, the AUCs of the above factors were 0.777, 0.686, and 0.670, respectively. Combining these three findings for the prediction of HCC resulted in a specificity greater than 97%, and the AUC further increased to 0.874.

CONCLUSION

The presence of restricted diffusion, delayed enhancement, and mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity can be useful features for risk stratification of coexisting LR-3 and LR-4 lesions in HCC patients. Trial registration a prospective clinical trial (ChiCTR2000036201).

The comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI LI-RADS for nodules ≤2 cm in patients at high risk for HCC: a prospective study

Objectives

To investigate the consistency of LI-RADS of CEUS and EOB-MRI in the categorization of liver nodules ≤2cm in patients at high risk for HCC.

Methods

Patients at high risk for HCC with nodules ≤2cm who underwent CEUS and EOB-MRI in our hospital were prospectively enrolled. The CEUS images and EOB-MRI imaging of each liver nodule were observed to evaluate inter-observer consistency and category according to CEUS LI-RADS V2017 and CT/MRI LI-RADS V2017 criteria double blinded. Pathology and/or follow-up were used as reference standard.

Results

A total of 127 nodules in 119 patients met the inclusion criteria. The inter-observer agreement was good on CEUS and EOB-MRI LI-RADS (kappa = 0.76, 0.76 p < 0.001). The inter-modality agreement was fair (kappa=0.21, p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in PPV and specificity between CEUS and EOB-MRI LR-5 for HCC, while the difference in AUC was statistically significant. We used new criteria (CEUS LR-5 and EOB-MRI LR-4/5 or CEUS LR-4/5 and EOB-MRI LR-5) to diagnose HCC. The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of this criteria was 63.4%, 95.6%, and 0.80.

Conclusions

CEUS and EOB-MRI showed fair inter-modality agreement in LI-RADS categorization of nodules ≤2 cm. The inter-observer agreement of CEUS and EOB-MRI LI-RADS were substantial. CEUS and EOB-MRI LR-5 have equally good positive predictive value and specificity for HCC ≤ 2cm, and combining these two modalities may better diagnose HCC ≤ 2 cm.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT04212286.

Automatic segmentation of hepatocellular carcinoma on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI based on deep learning

Objective. Precise hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection is crucial for clinical management. While studies focus on computed tomography-based automatic algorithms, there is a rareness of research on automatic detection based on dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging. This study is to develop an automatic detection and segmentation deep learning model for HCC using DCE.Approach: DCE images acquired from 2016 to 2021 were retrospectively collected. Then, 382 patients (301 male; 81 female) with 466 lesions pathologically confirmed were included and divided into an 80% training-validation set and a 20% independent test set. For external validation, 51 patients (42 male; 9 female) in another hospital from 2018 to 2021 were included. The U-net architecture was modified to accommodate multi-phasic DCE input. The model was trained with the training-validation set using five-fold cross-validation, and furtherly evaluated with the independent test set using comprehensive metrics for segmentation and detection performance. The proposed automatic segmentation model consisted of five main steps: phase registration, automatic liver region extraction using a pre-trained model, automatic HCC lesion segmentation using the multi-phasic deep learning model, ensemble of five-fold predictions, and post-processing using connected component analysis to enhance the performance to refine predictions and eliminate false positives.Main results. The proposed model achieved a mean dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.81 ± 0.11, a sensitivity of 94.41 ± 15.50%, a precision of 94.19 ± 17.32%, and 0.14 ± 0.48 false positive lesions per patient in the independent test set. The model detected 88% (80/91) HCC lesions in the condition of DSC > 0.5, and the DSC per tumor was 0.80 ± 0.13. In the external set, the model detected 92% (58/62) lesions with 0.12 ± 0.33 false positives per patient, and the DSC per tumor was 0.75 ± 0.10.Significance.This study developed an automatic detection and segmentation deep learning model for HCC using DCE, which yielded promising post-processed results in accurately identifying and delineating HCC lesions.

Clinical significance of exosomal noncoding RNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma: a narrative review

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most lethal malignancies worldwide, with poor prognosis owing to its high frequency of recurrence and metastasis. Moreover, most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage owing to a lack of early detection markers. Exosomes, which are characterized by their cargos of stable intracellular messengers, such as DNA, RNA, proteins, and lipids, play a crucial role in regulating cell differentiation and HCC development. Recently, exosomal noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), including microRNAs, long ncRNAs, and circular RNAs, have become increasingly important diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive markers of HCC. Herein, we discuss the clinical implications of exosomal ncRNAs, specifically those within the HCC regulatory network.

Liver imaging reporting and data system diagnostic performance in hepatocellular carcinoma when modifying the definition of "washout" on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

The sensitivity of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) was suboptimal. This study evaluated the LI-RADS diagnostic performance in HCC when modifying the definition of washout using the transition phase (TP) or hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointensity on EOB-MRI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients at high risk of HCC who underwent EOB-MRI from June 2016 to June 2021. Three modified LI-RADS (mLI-RADS) algorithms were formulated according to different definitions of washout as follows: (a) portal venous phase (PVP) or TP hypointensity, (b) PVP or HBP hypointensity, and (c) PVP or TP or HBP hypointensity. Diagnostic performance, including sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, was compared between mLI-RADS and LI-RADS v2018 using McNemar's test.

RESULTS

A total of 379 patients with 426 pathologically confirmed hepatic observations (250 HCCs, 88 nonHCC malignancies, and 88 benign lesions) were included in our study. The sensitivity rates of mLI-RADS a-c (80.0 %, 80.8 %, and 80.8 %) were all higher than that of LI-RADS v2018 (74.4 %) (all p < 0.05). The specificity rates of mLI-RADS a-c (86.9 %, 85.8 %, and 85.8 %) were all slightly lower than that of LI-RADS v2018 (88.6 %), although no statistically significant difference was noted (all p > 0.05). The accuracies of the three mLI-RADS algorithms were the same and were all higher than that of LI-RADS v2018 (82.9 % vs. 80.3 %, all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

When the definition of washout appearance was extended to TP or HBP hypointensity on EOB-MRI, the diagnostic sensitivity of LI-RADS for HCC improved without decreasing specificity.

CT texture features and lung shunt fraction measured using 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin SPECT/CT before trans-arterial radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma patients

The aim of this study is to determine whether contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT)-based texture parameters can predict high (> 30 Gy) expected lung dose (ELD) calculated using 99mTc macroaggregated albumin single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) for pre-trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) dosimetry. 35 patients were analyzed, with a treatable planned dose of ≥ 200 Gy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Lung shunt fraction (LSF) was obtained from planar and SPECT/CT scans. Texture features of the tumor lesion on CECT before TARE were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to determine potential ELD > 30 Gy predictors. Among the 35 patients, nine (25.7%) had ELD > 30 Gy, and had a higher LSF than the ELD ≤ 30 Gy group using the planar (20.7 ± 8.0% vs. 6.3 ± 3.3%; P < 0.001) and SPECT/CT (12.4 ± 5.1% vs. 3.5 ± 2.0%; P < 0.001) scans. The tumor integral total (HU × L) value was a predictor for high LSF using SPECT/CT, with an area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.983 (95% confidence interval: 0.869-1.000, P < 0.001), 100%, and 88.5%, respectively. The tumor integral total value is an imaging marker for predicting ELD > 30 Gy. Applying CECT texture analysis may assist in reducing time and cost in patient selection and modifying TARE treatment plans.

Prevalence of different LI-RADS v2018 categories in high-risk patients undergoing CT- or MRI-based screening for hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To estimate the prevalence of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS, LR) v2018 categories reported on CT or MRI performed for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included all reports for CT and MRI exams performed for HCC screening patients between 8/2018 and 4/2020. Patients with ultrasound, CT, or MRI of the abdomen within two years of the index exam were excluded. From each radiology report, we extracted number of reported liver observations, and LI-RADS v2018 category for each observation.

RESULTS

There were 329 patients (170 [52%] male, mean age 59 years [SD 12]), of whom 177 (54%) had MRI with gadoxetate, 72 (22%) had MRI with extracellular contrast, 7 (2%) had MRI with unspecified contrast, and 73 (22%) had CT. Of 329 patients, 199 (60%) had no reported observations; 130 patients had 166 reported observations: 114 (68.7%) LR-1, 8 (4.8%) LR-2, 21 (12.6%) LR-3, 6 (3.6%) LR-4, 13 (7.8%) LR-5, 3 (1.8%) LR-M, and 1 (0.6%) LR-TIV. Of 114 LR-1 observations, 78 (68%) were cysts, 17 (15%) were hemangiomas, 12 (11%) were vascular shunts, 3 (3%) were focal nodular hyperplasia, 2 (2%) were siderotic nodules, 1 (1%) was a lipoma, and 1 (1%) was biliary hamartoma. There were 23 observations with probably or definitely malignant categories (LR-4, LR-5, LR-M or LR- TIV), reported in 20/329 (6%) of patients.

CONCLUSION

In a cohort of at-risk patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT/MRI for HCC screening, 60% of had no liver observations, and 6 % had probably or definitely malignant observations.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE

The prevalence of LI-RADS v2018 categories on CT or MR exams used for HCC screening can help develop screening criteria and assess cost-effectiveness of surveillance strategies with CT and MRI.

Deep learning nomogram based on Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI for predicting early recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy

OBJECTIVES

The accurate prediction of post-hepatectomy early recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is crucial for decision-making regarding postoperative adjuvant treatment and monitoring. We aimed to explore the feasibility of deep learning (DL) features derived from gadoxetate disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA) MRI, qualitative features, and clinical variables for predicting early recurrence.

METHODS

In this bicentric study, 285 patients with HCC who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI before resection were divided into training (n = 195) and validation (n = 90) sets. DL features were extracted from contrast-enhanced MRI images using VGGNet-19. Three feature selection methods and five classification methods were combined for DL signature construction. Subsequently, an mp-MR DL signature fused with multiphase DL signatures of contrast-enhanced images was constructed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify early recurrence risk factors including mp-MR DL signature, microvascular invasion (MVI), and tumor number. A DL nomogram was built by incorporating deep features and significant clinical variables to achieve early recurrence prediction.

RESULTS

MVI (p = 0.039), tumor number (p = 0.001), and mp-MR DL signature (p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for early recurrence. The DL nomogram outperformed the clinical nomogram in the training set (AUC: 0.949 vs. 0.751; p < 0.001) and validation set (AUC: 0.909 vs. 0.715; p = 0.002). Excellent DL nomogram calibration was achieved in both training and validation sets. Decision curve analysis confirmed the clinical usefulness of DL nomogram.

CONCLUSION

The proposed DL nomogram was superior to the clinical nomogram in predicting early recurrence for HCC patients after hepatectomy.

KEY POINTS

• Deep learning signature based on Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI was the predominant independent predictor of early recurrence for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy. • Deep learning nomogram based on clinical factors and Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI features is promising for predicting early recurrence of HCC. • Deep learning nomogram outperformed the conventional clinical nomogram in predicting early recurrence.

Characterization of hepatobiliary phase hypointense nodules without arterial phase hyperenhancement on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI via contrast-enhanced ultrasound using perfluorobutane

PURPOSE

Hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointense nodules without arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (GA-MRI) may be nonmalignant cirrhosis-associated nodules or hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). We aimed to characterize HBP hypointense nodules without APHE on GA-MRI by performing contrast-enhanced ultrasound using perfluorobutane (PFB-CEUS).

METHODS

In this prospective, single-center study, participants at high-risk of HCC having HBP hypointense nodules without APHE at GA-MRI were enrolled. All participants underwent PFB-CEUS; if APHE and late, mild washout or washout in the Kupffer phase were present, the diagnosis of HCC was established according to the v2022 Korean guidelines. The reference standard consisted of histopathology or imaging. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values of PFB-CEUS for detecting HCC were calculated. Associations between clinical/imaging features and the diagnosis of HCC were evaluated with logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

In total, 67 participants (age, 67.0 years ± 8.4; 56 men) with 67 HBP hypointense nodules without APHE (median size, 1.5 cm [range, 1.0-3.0 cm]) were included. The prevalence of HCC was 11.9% (8/67). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of PFB-CEUS for detecting HCC were 12.5%(1/8), 96.6%(57/59), 33.3%(1/3) and 89.1%(57/64), respectively. Mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity on GA-MRI (odds ratio, 5.756; P = 0.042) and washout in the Kupffer phase on PFB-CEUS (odds ratio, 5.828; P = 0.048) were independently associated with HCC.

CONCLUSION

Among HBP hypointense nodules without APHE, PFB-CEUS was specific for detecting HCC, which had a low prevalence. Mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity on GA-MRI and washout in the Kupffer phase on PFB-CEUS may be useful to detect HCC in those nodules.

Ultrasound fusion imaging for improving diagnostic and therapeutic strategies of focal liver lesions: A preliminary study

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of ultrasound (US) fusion imaging on the clinical diagnostic and therapeutic strategies of focal liver lesions, which are difficult to detect or diagnose by conventional US.

METHODS

From November 2019 to June 2022, 71 patients with invisible or undiagnosed focal liver lesions who underwent fusion imaging combining US with CT or MR were included in this retrospective study. The reasons for US fusion imaging were as follows: (1) lesions that were undetectable or inconspicuous on B-mode US; (2) post-ablation lesions that could not be assessed accurately by B-mode US; (3) to evaluate whether the lesions detected by B-mode US that were consistent with those presented on MRI/CT images.

RESULTS

Of the 71 cases, 43 cases were single lesions, and 28 cases were multiple lesions. Among the 46 cases which were invisible on conventional US, the display rate of lesions using US-CT/MRI fusion imaging was 30.8%, and that combined with CEUS was 76.9%. US-guided biopsy was performed in 30 patients after the detection and localization determined by fusion imaging, with a positive rate of 73.3%. Six patients with recurrence after ablation therapy were all detected and located accurately after fusion imaging, and 4 of them successfully underwent ablation therapy again.

CONCLUSION

Fusion imaging contributes to the understanding of the anatomical relationship between lesion location and blood vessels. Additionally, fusion imaging can improve the diagnostic confidence, be helpful to guide interventional operations, and hence be conducive to clinical therapeutic strategies.

Estimating postsurgical outcomes of patients with a single hepatocellular carcinoma using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: risk scoring system development and validation

OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate risk scoring systems using gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI features and clinical factors that predict recurrence-free survival (RFS) of a single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Consecutive 295 patients with treatment-naïve single HCC who underwent curative surgery were retrospectively enrolled from two centers. Cox proportional hazard models developed risk scoring systems whose discriminatory powers were validated using external data and compared to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) or American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging systems using Harrell's C-index.

RESULTS

Independent variables-tumor size (per cm; hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.13; p = 0.005), targetoid appearance (HR, 1.74; 95% CI: 1.07-2.83; p = 0.025), radiologic tumor in vein or tumor vascular invasion (HR, 2.59; 95% CI: 1.69-3.97; p < 0.001), the presence of a nonhypervascular hypointense nodule on the hepatobiliary phase (HR, 4.65; 95% CI: 3.03-7.14; p < 0.001), and pathologic macrovascular invasion (HR, 2.60; 95% CI: 1.51-4.48; p = 0.001)-with tumor markers (AFP ≥ 206 ng/mL or PIVKA-II ≥ 419 mAU/mL) derived pre- and postoperative risk scoring systems. The risk scores showed comparably good discriminatory powers in the validation set (C-index, 0.75-0.82) and outperformed the BCLC (C-index, 0.61) and AJCC staging systems (C-index, 0.58; ps < 0.05). The preoperative scoring system stratified the patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk for recurrence, whose 2-year recurrence rate was 3.3%, 31.8%, and 85.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The developed and validated pre- and postoperative risk scoring systems can estimate RFS after surgery for a single HCC.

KEY POINTS

• The risk scoring systems predicted RFS better than the BCLC and AJCC staging systems (C-index, 0.75-0.82 vs. 0.58-0.61; ps < 0.05). • Five variables-tumor size, targetoid appearance, radiologic tumor in vein or vascular invasion, the presence of a nonhypervascular hypointense nodule on the hepatobiliary phase, and pathologic macrovascular invasion-combined with tumor markers derived risk scoring systems predicting postsurgical RFS for a single HCC. • In the risk scoring system using preoperatively-available factors, patients were classified into three distinct risk groups, with 2-year recurrence rates in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups being 3.3%, 31.8%, and 85.7% in the validation set.

A new classification and regression tree algorithm: Improved diagnostic sensitivity for HCC ≤ 3.0 cm using gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI

PURPOSE

To develop and validate an effective algorithm, based on classification and regression tree (CART) analysis and LI-RADS features, for diagnosing HCC ≤ 3.0 cm with gadoxetate disodium‑enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI).

METHOD

We retrospectively included 299 and 90 high-risk patients with hepatic lesions ≤ 3.0 cm that underwent Gd-EOB-MRI from January 2018 to February 2021 in institution 1 (development cohort) and institution 2 (validation cohort), respectively. Through binary and multivariate regression analyses of LI-RADS features in the development cohort, we developed an algorithm using CART analysis, which comprised the targeted appearance and independently significant imaging features. On per-lesion basis, we compared the diagnostic performances of our algorithm, two previously reported CART algorithms, and LI-RADS LR-5 in development and validation cohorts.

RESULTS

Our CART algorithm, presenting as a decision tree, included targetoid appearance, HBP hypointensity, nonrim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), and transitional phase hypointensity plus mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity. For definite HCC diagnosis, the overall sensitivity of our algorithm (development cohort 93.2%, validation cohort 92.5%; P < 0.006) was significantly higher than those of Jiang's algorithm modified LR-5 (defined as targetoid appearance, nonperipheral washout, restricted diffusion, and nonrim APHE) and LI-RADS LR-5, with the comparable specificity (development cohort: 84.3%, validation cohort: 86.7%; P ≥ 0.006). Our algorithm, providing the highest balanced accuracy (development cohort: 91.2%, validation cohort: 91.6%), outperformed other criteria for identifying HCCs from non-HCC lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

In high-risk patients, our CART algorithm developed with LI-RADS features showed promise for the early diagnosis of HCC ≤ 3.0 cm with Gd-EOB-MRI.

Utilization of a Machine Learning Algorithm for the Application of Ancillary Features to LI-RADS Categories LR3 and LR4 on Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced MRI

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to identify the important ancillary features (AFs) and determine the utilization of a machine-learning-based strategy for applying AFs for LI-RADS LR3/4 observations on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed MRI features of LR3/4 determined with only major features. Uni- and multivariate analyses and random forest analysis were performed to identify AFs associated with HCC. A decision tree algorithm of applying AFs for LR3/4 was compared with other alternative strategies using McNemar's test.

RESULTS

We evaluated 246 observations from 165 patients. In multivariate analysis, restricted diffusion and mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity showed independent associations with HCC (odds ratios: 12.4 [p < 0.001] and 2.5 [p = 0.02]). In random forest analysis, restricted diffusion is the most important feature for HCC. Our decision tree algorithm showed higher AUC, sensitivity, and accuracy (0.84, 92.0%, and 84.5%) than the criteria of usage of restricted diffusion (0.78, 64.5%, and 76.4%; all p < 0.05); however, our decision tree algorithm showed lower specificity than the criterion of usage of restricted diffusion (71.1% vs. 91.3%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our decision tree algorithm of applying AFs for LR3/4 shows significantly increased AUC, sensitivity, and accuracy but reduced specificity. These appear to be more appropriate in certain circumstances in which there is an emphasis on the early detection of HCC.

Classification tree analysis to evaluate the most useful magnetic resonance image type in the differentiation between early and progressed hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM

Using classification tree analysis, we evaluated the most useful magnetic resonance (MR) image type in the differentiation between early and progressed hepatocellular carcinoma (eHCC and pHCC).

METHODS

We included pathologically proven 214 HCCs (28 eHCCs and 186 pHCCs) in 144 patients. The signal intensity of HCCs was assessed on in-phase (T1in) and opposed-phase T1-weighted images (T1op), ultrafast T2-weighted images (ufT2WI), fat-saturated T2-weighted images (fsT2WI), diffusion-weighted images (DWI), contrast enhanced T1-weighted images in the arterial phase (AP), portal venous phase (PVP), and the hepatobiliary phase. Fat content and washout were also evaluated. Fisher's exact test was performed to evaluate usefulness for the differentiation. Then, we chose MR images using binary logistic regression analysis and performed classification and regression tree analysis with them. Diagnostic performances of the classification tree were evaluated using a stratified 10-fold cross-validation method.

RESULTS

T1in, ufT2WI, fsT2WI, DWI, AP, PVP, fat content, and washout were all useful for the differentiation (p < 0.05), and AP and T1in were finally chosen for creating classification trees (p < 0.05). AP appeared in the first node in the tree. The area under the curve, sensitivity and specificity for eHCC, and balanced accuracy of the classification tree were 0.83 (95% CI 0.74-0.91), 0.64 (18/28, 95% CI 0.46-0.82), 0.94 (174/186, 95% CI 0.90-0.97), and 0.79 (95% CI 0.70-0.87), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

AP is the most useful MR image type and T1in the second in the differentiation between eHCC and pHCC.

Percentages of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in LI-RADS Categories with CT and MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) CT and MRI algorithm applies equally to CT, MRI with extracellular contrast agents (ECA-MRI), and MRI with gadoxetate (Gx-MRI). Purpose To estimate pooled percentages of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and overall malignancy for each LI-RADS category with CT and MRI. Materials and Methods MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for research articles (January 2014-April 2021) reporting the percentages of observations in each LI-RADS category with use of versions 2014, 2017, or 2018. Study design, population characteristics, imaging modality, reference standard, and numbers of HCC and non-HCC malignancies in each category were recorded. A random-effects model evaluated the pooled percentage of HCC and overall malignancy for each category. Results There were 49 studies with 9620 patients and a total 11 562 observations, comprising 7921 HCCs, 1132 non-HCC malignancies, and 2509 benign entities. No HCC or non-HCC malignancies were reported with any modality in the LR-1 category. The pooled percentages of HCC for CT, ECA-MRI, and Gx-MRI, respectively, were 10%, 6%, and 1% for LR-2 (P = .16); 48%, 31%, and 38% for LR-3 (P = .42); 76%, 64%, and 77% for LR-4 (P = .62); 96%, 95%, and 96% for LR-5 (P = .76); 88%, 76%, and 78% for LR-5V or LR-TIV (tumor in vein) (P = .42); and 20%, 30%, and 35% for LR-M (P = .32). Most LR-M (93%-100%) and LR-5V or LR-TIV (99%-100%) observations were malignant, regardless of modality. Conclusion There was no difference in percentages of hepatocellular carcinoma and overall malignancy between CT, MRI with extracellular contrast agents, and MRI with gadoxetate for any Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System categories. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article See also the editorial by Ronot in this issue.

Clinical outcomes of patients with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 or Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 observations in patients with cirrhosis: A systematic review

Patients with indeterminate liver nodules, classified as LR-3 and LR-4 observations per the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System, are at risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but risk estimates remain imprecise. We conducted a systematic review of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from inception to December 2021 to identify cohort studies examining HCC incidence among patients with LR-3 or LR-4 observations on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Predictors of HCC were abstracted from each study, when available. Of 13 total studies, nine conducted LR-3 observation-level analyses, with the proportions of incident HCC ranging from 1.2% to 12.5% at 12 months and 4.2% to 44.4% during longer study follow-up. Among three studies with patient-level analyses, 8%-22.2% of patients with LR-3 lesions developed LR-4 observations and 11.1%-24.5% developed HCC. Among nine studies conducting LR-4 observation-level analyses, incident HCC ranged from 30.8% to 44.0% at 12 months and 30.9% to 71.0% during study follow-up; conversely, 6%-42% of observations were downgraded to LR-3 or lower. Patient-level factors associated with HCC included older age, male sex, higher alpha-fetoprotein levels, viral etiology, and prior history of HCC; observation-level factors included maximum diameter, threshold growth, T2 hyperintensity, and visibility on ultrasound. Studies were limited by small sample sizes, inclusion of patients with prior HCC, short follow-up duration, and failure to account for clustering of observations in patients or competing risks of transplantation and death. LR-3 and LR-4 observations have elevated but variable risks of HCC. Higher quality studies are necessary to identify high-risk patients who warrant close CT or MRI-based follow-up.

LR-3 and LR-4 Lesions Are More Likely to Be Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Transplant Patients with LR-5 or LR-TR Lesions

BACKGROUND

Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) classifies liver nodules from LR-1 to LR-5 based on risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It is challenging to know the nature of the LR-3 and LR-4 lesions.

AIMS

To test our hypothesis that in patients with a definite HCC (LR-5) or treated HCC (LR-TR), a coexisting LR-3 or LR-4 lesion is more likely to represent HCC compared to patients without LR-5 or LR-TR lesions.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study including all adult patients who received liver transplantation in our institution from 1/1/2014 to 3/3/2020 who had any LR-3 or LR-4 lesion on pre-transplant MRI.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients were included in the final cohort (115 LR-3 and LR-4 lesions total). When accompanied by LR-5 or LR-TR lesions, 41% (28/69) of LR-3 lesions were HCC compared to 12% (3/25) when not accompanied by LR-5 LR-TR lesions. When accompanied by LR-5 or LR-TR lesions, 83% (10/12) of LR-4 lesions were HCC, versus 33% (3/9) when not accompanied by LR-5 or LR-TR lesions. In a multivariable analysis of all lesions, the presence of a LR-5 or LR-TR lesion was significantly associated with LR-3 or LR-4 lesions representing HCC (OR 6.4, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

LR-3 and LR-4 lesions are more likely to be HCC in patients with LR-5 or LR-TR lesions. The presence of coexisting definite HCC may be a useful diagnostic feature to improve risk stratification of lesions without typical imaging features of HCC. This may also affect decision-making prior to liver transplant when HCC burden must be accurately determined.

Automatic Liver Tumor Segmentation on Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI Using 4D Information: Deep Learning Model Based on 3D Convolution and Convolutional LSTM

OBJECTIVE

Accurate segmentation of liver tumors, which could help physicians make appropriate treatment decisions and assess the effectiveness of surgical treatment, is crucial for the clinical diagnosis of liver cancer. In this study, we propose a 4-dimensional (4D) deep learning model based on 3D convolution and convolutional long short-term memory (C-LSTM) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesion segmentation.

METHODS

The proposed deep learning model utilizes 4D information on dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images to assist liver tumor segmentation. Specifically, a shallow U-net based 3D CNN module was designed to extract 3D spatial domain features from each DCE phase, followed by a 4-layer C-LSTM network module for time domain information exploitation. The combined information of multi-phase DCE images and the manner by which tissue imaging features change on multi-contrast images allow the network to more effectively learn the characteristics of HCC, resulting in better segmentation performance.

RESULTS

The proposed model achieved a Dice score of 0.825± 0.077, a Hausdorff distance of 12.84± 8.14 mm, and a volume similarity of 0.891± 0.080 for liver tumor segmentation, which outperformed the 3D U-net model, RA-UNet model and other models in the ablation study in both internal and external test sets. Moreover, the performance of the proposed model is comparable to the nnU-Net model, which showed state-of-the-art performance in many segmentation tasks, with significantly reduced prediction time.

CONCLUSION

The proposed 3D convolution and C-LSTM based model can achieve accurate segmentation of HCC lesions.

HCC or Something Else? Frequency of Various Benign and Malignant Etiologies in Cirrhotic Patients with Newly Detected Focal Liver Lesions in Relation to Different Clinical and Sonographic Parameters

Background and Aims: To investigate the frequency of different benign and malignant focal liver lesions (FLLs) in relation to clinical and sonographic features among patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) and newly detected FLLs. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of 225 cirrhotic patients with newly detected FLLs who underwent hepatic ultrasound (US) examinations at our university hospital from 2011 to 2022. The diagnosis of FLLs was based on histology and/or consensus radiological criteria, in accordance with the current diagnostic guidelines. The FLLs were classified into benign (bFLLs) or malignant (mFLLs) lesions and the latter group was subclassified into HCC and non-HCC mFLLs. The frequency, clinical parameters, and sonographic features of the different groups were examined and compared. Results: Of the 225 FLLs, 154 (68.4%) were mFLLs and 71 (31.6%) bFLLs. HCC was the most frequent subcategory of FLLs (132; 58.7%). There were (22; 9.8%) non-HCC mFLLs with 11 (4.9%) metastases and 11 (4.9%) non-HCC primary liver tumors. Regenerative nodules (RNs) were the most frequent form of bFLLs (25; 11.1%), followed by simple cysts (22; 9.8%) and hemangiomas (14; 6.2%). The other bFLLs (10; 14.1%) were fat deposition/sparing (5), hematomas (2), abscesses (2), and echinococcal cysts (1). The distribution of bFLLs and HCC and non-HCC mFLLs varied significantly according to the clinical scenarios. HCC mFLLs were more frequent in males (p = 0.001), in those with no history of active non-hepatic primary malignant disease (NHPMD) (p < 0.001), in those with a hepatitis B or C etiology of LC (p = 0.002), when located in the right lobe (p = 0.008), and when portal vein thrombosis was present (p = 0.03). Conclusion: In cirrhotic patients with newly detected FLLs, the non-HCC etiology was more frequently diagnosed in lesions that were located in the left lobe, in females, and in patients with a history of active NHPMD. Thus, the lower frequency of HCC in the abovementioned groups demonstrated that a cautious implementation of the current consensus radiological criteria would be required for these groups, particularly in patients with an active NHPMD, given the fact that the consensus criteria were not validated in these populations. A more active diagnostic approach may ultimately be needed for these patients. Large prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Association of dysmorphic intratumoral vessel with high lung shunt fraction in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

To evaluate the role of dysmorphic intratumoral vessels as imaging marker for the prediction of high lung shunt fraction (LSF) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This retrospective study included 403 patients with HCC who underwent a planning arteriography for transarterial radioembolization with administration of 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin to calculate LSF. The LSF was measured by using planar body scans. Two radiologists evaluated the pre-treatment contrast-enhanced CT findings, including tumor number, size, margin, distribution, tumor burden, portal and hepatic vein invasion, early hepatic vein enhancement, and dysmorphic intratumoral vessels. The logistic regression analysis was performed to determine significant predictors for high LSF > 20%. Using the identified predictors, diagnostic criteria for high LSF were proposed. Among 403 patients, 52 (13%) patients had high LSF > 20%, and dysmorphic tumor vessels were present in 115 (28.5%) patients. Predictors for LSF > 20% were tumor size > 11 cm, hepatic vein invasion, early hepatic vein enhancement, and dysmorphic intratumoral vessel. If the patient had three or more of the four predictors for LSF > 20% on imaging, the accuracy and specificity for diagnosing LSF > 20% were 88.8% and 96.3% respectively. Dysmorphic intratumoral vessel in HCC is an imaging marker suggesting a high LSF, which may be applicable to treatment modification or patient exclusion for radioembolization with combined interpretation of tumor size and hepatic vein abnormality.

Diagnostic performance of CT versus MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category 5 for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

OBJECTIVE

To compare the performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category 5 (LR-5) for diagnosing HCC between CT and MRI using comparative studies.

METHODS

The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to April 21, 2021, to identify studies that directly compare the diagnostic performance of LR-5 for HCC between CT and MRI. A bivariate random-effects model was fitted to calculate the pooled per-observation sensitivity and specificity of LR-5 of each modality, and compare the pooled estimates of paired data. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the MRI contrast agent.

RESULTS

Seven studies with 1145 observations (725 HCCs) were included in the final analysis. The pooled per-observation sensitivity of LR-5 for diagnosing HCC was higher using MRI (61%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 43-76%; I² = 95%) than CT (48%; 95% CI, 31-65%; I² = 97%) (p < 0.001). The pooled per-observation specificities of LR-5 did not show statistically significant difference between CT (96%; 95% CI, 92-98%; I² = 0%) and MRI (93%; 95% CI, 88-96%; I² = 16%) (p = 0.054). In the subgroup analysis, extracellular contrast agent-enhanced MRI showed significantly higher pooled per-observation sensitivity than gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for diagnosing HCC (73% [95% CI, 55-85%] vs. 55% [95% CI, 39-70%]; p = 0.007), without a significant difference in specificity (93% [95% CI, 80-98%] vs. 94% [95% CI, 87-97%]; p = 0.884).

CONCLUSIONS

The LR-5 of MRI showed significantly higher pooled per-observation sensitivity than CT for diagnosing HCC. The pooled per-observation specificities of LR-5 were comparable between the two modalities.

KEY POINTS

• The pooled sensitivity of LR-5 using MRI was higher than that using CT (61% versus 48%), but the pooled specificities of LR-5 were not significantly different between CT and MRI (96% versus 93%). • Subgroup analysis according to the MRI contrast media showed a significantly higher pooled per-observation sensitivity using ECA-enhanced MRI than with EOB-enhanced MRI (73% versus 55%), and comparable specificities (93% versus 94%). • Although LI-RADS provides a common diagnostic algorithm for CT or MRI, the per-observation performance of LR-5 can be affected by the imaging modality as well as the MRI contrast agent.

Hepatobiliary phase images of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI may improve accuracy of predicting the size of hepatocellular carcinoma at pathology

BACKGROUND

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been widely used in clinical practice. However, scientific evidence is lacking for recommending a particular sequence for measuring tumor size.

PURPOSE

To retrospectively compare the size of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) measured on different gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI sequences using pathology as a reference.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 217 patients with single HCC who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI before surgery were included. The size of the HCC was measured by two abdominal radiologists independently on the following sequences: T1-weighted; T2-weighted; b-500 diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI); and arterial, portal venous, transitional, and hepatobiliary phases. Tumor size measured on MRI was compared with pathological size by using Pearson correlation coefficient, independent-sample t test, and Bland-Altman plot. Agreement between two readers was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Correlation between the MR images and pathology was high for both readers (0.899-0.955). Absolute error between MRI and pathologic assessment was lowest on hepatobiliary phase images for both readers (reader 1, 2.8±4.2 mm; reader 2, 3.2±3.4 mm) and highest on arterial phase images for reader 1 (4.9±4.4 mm) and DWI phase images for reader 2 (5.1±4.9 mm). Absolute errors were significantly different for hepatobiliary phase compared with other sequences for both readers (reader 1, P≤0.012; reader 2, P≤0.037). Inter-reader agreements for all sequence measurements were strong (0.971-0.997).

CONCLUSION

The performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI sequences varied with HCC size, and the hepatobiliary phase may be optimal among these sequences.

Gadoxetate-Enhanced MRI as a Diagnostic Tool in the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Report from a 2020 Asia-Pacific Multidisciplinary Expert Meeting

Gadoxetate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used in clinical practice for liver imaging. For optimal use, we must understand both its advantages and limitations. This article is the outcome of an online advisory board meeting and subsequent discussions by a multidisciplinary group of experts on liver diseases across the Asia-Pacific region, first held on September 28, 2020. Here, we review the technical considerations for the use of gadoxetate, its current role in the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and its relevance in consensus guidelines for HCC imaging diagnosis. In the latter part of this review, we examine recent evidence evaluating the impact of gadoxetate on clinical outcomes on a continuum from diagnosis to treatment decision-making and follow-up. In conclusion, we outline the potential future roles of gadoxetate MRI based on an evolving understanding of the clinical utility of this contrast agent in the management of patients at risk of, or with, HCC.

Risk Stratification and Distribution of Hepatocellular Carcinomas in CEUS and CT/MRI LI-RADS: A Meta-Analysis

Background

CEUS LI-RADS and CT/MRI LI-RADS have been used in clinical practice for several years. However, there is a lack of evidence-based study to compare the proportion of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) in each category and the distribution of HCCs of these two categorization systems.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the proportion of HCCs between corresponding CEUS LI-RADS and CT/MRI LI-RADS categories and the distribution of HCCs and non-HCC malignancies in each category.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases from January 2014 to December 2021. The proportion of HCCs and non-HCC malignancies and the corresponding sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) of the LR-5 and LR-M categories were determined using a random-effect model.

Results

A total of 43 studies were included. The proportion of HCCs in CEUS LR-5 was 96%, and that in CECT/MRI LR-5 was 95% (p > 0.05). The proportion of non-HCC malignancy in CEUS LR-M was lower than that of CT/MRI LR-M (35% vs. 58%, p = 0.01). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CEUS LR-5 for HCCs were 73%, 92%, and 78%, respectively, and of CT/MRI LR-5 for HCCs, 69%, 92%, and 76%, respectively.

Conclusion

With the upshift of the LI-RADS category, the proportion of HCCs increased. CEUS LR-3 has a lower risk of HCCs than CT/MRI LR-3. CEUS LR-5 and CT/MRI LR-5 have a similar diagnostic performance for HCCs. CEUS LR-M has a higher proportion of HCCs and a lower proportion of non-HCC malignancies compared with CT/MRI LR-M.

Do transition and hepatobiliary phase hypointensity improve LI-RADS categorization as an alternative washout: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The definition of washout in gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI) is controversial. The current Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) defines washout only in the portal venous phase on Gd-EOB-MRI, leading to low diagnostic sensitivity for HCC. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic performance of Gd-EOB-MRI using conventional (cWO) and modified (mWO) definitions of washout.

METHODS

The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched to identify studies published between January 1, 2010, and August 1, 2021, that compared the diagnostic performance of cWO and mWO for HCC. The mWOs added transition phase (TP) hypointensity (mWO-1), hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointensity (mWO-2), or both (mWO-3). The pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model. Study heterogeneity was explored by subgroup analysis and meta-regression analysis.

RESULTS

Ten comparative studies with 2391 patients were included. Compared to cWO, the overall mWO yielded significantly higher sensitivity (71% vs. 81%, p = 0.00) and lower specificity (97% vs. 93%, p = 0.01) for diagnosing HCC. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.90 and 0.94 for the cWO and mWO, respectively. Regarding the three types of mWOs, mWO-2 showed the highest sensitivity (85%) and specificity (96%) for diagnosing HCC. mWO-2 achieved the highest AUC (0.97), followed by mWO-1 (0.90), and mWO-3 (0.89). Average reviewer experience and scanner field strength were significantly associated with study heterogeneity (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Inclusion of TP and HBP hypointensity in the definition of washout improved the sensitivity with slightly lower specificity for diagnosing HCC in LI-RADS.

KEY POINTS

• Compared to the conventional definition of washout, studies using a modified definition had higher sensitivity (71% vs. 81%) but lower specificity (97% vs. 93%) in LI-RADS for the diagnosis of HCC. • Hepatobiliary phase hypointensity may be a preferred alternative washout for HCC diagnosis with the highest area under the curve. • Studies with experienced reviewer or 3.0T MRI showed higher sensitivity and lower specificity for diagnosing HCC when using modified washout (p < 0.05).

Can modified LI-RADS increase the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for the diagnosis of 10-19 mm hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI?

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 LR-5 criteria can be modified to increase sensitivity without reducing specificity for diagnosing 10-19 mm hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

A total of 133 high-risk consecutive patients with 174 small observations (10-19 mm) detected on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI were retrospectively studied. LI-RADS MRI major features (MFs) and ancillary features (AFs) were reviewed by two independent radiologists in consensus. Observations were categorized using LI-RADS v2018 MFs. Independently significant AFs were identified through logistic regression analysis. Upgraded LR-5 criteria were developed by combining independently significant AFs with MFs of LR-3 or LR-4 v2018. The sensitivity and specificity of the new diagnostic criteria were compared with those of LR-5 v2018 using McNemar's test.

RESULTS

Three of the AFs favoring malignancy [mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity, transitional phase (TP) hypointensity and fat in mass] were independently significant features for diagnosing 10-19 mm HCC. The upgraded LR-5 criteria (mLI-RADS VII: LR-4 + mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity/TP hypointensity or LR-3 + fat in mass) yielded a significantly greater sensitivity than that of the LR-5 v2018 criteria (70.4% vs 55.1%; p < 0.001), whereas the specificity was not significantly different (94.7% vs 98.7%, p = 0.250).

CONCLUSIONS

Independently significant AFs may be used to upgrade an observation from LR-3/LR-4 to LR-5, which can improve the sensitivity without impairing the specificity for diagnosing 10-19 mm HCC on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

Computed tomography for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma occurs mostly in people with chronic liver disease and ranks sixth in terms of global incidence of cancer, and fourth in terms of cancer deaths. In clinical practice, computed tomography (CT) is used as a second-line diagnostic imaging modality to confirm the presence of focal liver lesions suspected as hepatocellular carcinoma on prior diagnostic test such as abdominal ultrasound or alpha-foetoprotein, or both, either in surveillance programmes or in clinical settings. According to current guidelines, a single contrast-enhanced imaging study CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing typical hallmarks of hepatocellular carcinoma in people with cirrhosis is valid to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma. However, a significant number of hepatocellular carcinomas do not show typical hallmarks on imaging modalities, and hepatocellular carcinoma is, therefore, missed. There is no clear evidence of the benefit of surveillance programmes in terms of overall survival: the conflicting results can be a consequence of inaccurate detection, ineffective treatment, or both. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of CT may clarify whether the absence of benefit could be related to underdiagnosis. Furthermore, an assessment of the accuracy of CT in people with chronic liver disease, who are not included in surveillance programmes is needed for either ruling out or diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES

Primary: to assess the diagnostic accuracy of multidetector, multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and at any stage in adults with chronic liver disease, either in a surveillance programme or in a clinical setting. Secondary: to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CT for the diagnosis of resectable hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Trials Register, Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Diagnostic-Test-Accuracy Studies Register, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science until 4 May 2021. We applied no language or document-type restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of CT for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease, with cross-sectional designs, using one of the acceptable reference standards, such as pathology of the explanted liver and histology of resected or biopsied focal liver lesion with at least a six-month follow-up.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two review authors independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias and applicability concerns, using the QUADAS-2 checklist. We presented the results of sensitivity and specificity, using paired forest plots, and tabulated the results. We used a hierarchical meta-analysis model where appropriate. We presented uncertainty of the accuracy estimates using 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We double-checked all data extractions and analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 21 studies, with a total of 3101 participants. We judged all studies to be at high risk of bias in at least one domain because most studies used different reference standards, often inappropriate to exclude the presence of the target condition, and the time-interval between the index test and the reference standard was rarely defined. Regarding applicability in the patient selection domain, we judged 14% (3/21) of studies to be at low concern and 86% (18/21) of studies to be at high concern owing to characteristics of the participants who were on waiting lists for orthotopic liver transplantation. CT for hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage: sensitivity 77.5% (95% CI 70.9% to 82.9%) and specificity 91.3% (95% CI 86.5% to 94.5%) (21 studies, 3101 participants; low-certainty evidence). CT for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: sensitivity 71.4% (95% CI 60.3% to 80.4%) and specificity 92.0% (95% CI 86.3% to 95.5%) (10 studies, 1854 participants; low-certainty evidence). In the three studies at low concern for applicability (861 participants), we found sensitivity 76.9% (95% CI 50.8% to 91.5%) and specificity 89.2% (95% CI 57.0% to 98.1%). The observed heterogeneity in the results remains mostly unexplained. The sensitivity analyses, which included only studies with clearly prespecified positivity criteria and only studies in which the reference standard results were interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index test, showed no variation in the results.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In the clinical pathway for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease, CT has roles as a confirmatory test for hepatocellular carcinoma lesions, and for staging assessment. We found that using CT in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage, 22.5% of people with hepatocellular carcinoma would be missed, and 8.7% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would be unnecessarily treated. For resectable hepatocellular carcinoma, we found that 28.6% of people with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma would improperly not be resected, while 8% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would undergo inappropriate surgery. The uncertainty resulting from the high risk of bias in the included studies and concerns regarding their applicability limit our ability to confidently draw conclusions based on our results.

Is Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging an accurate diagnostic method for Hepatocellular Carcinoma? a systematic review with meta-analysis

Background： Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) has become a widely used liver-specific contrast agent worldwide, but its value and limitations as a diagnostic technique with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), have not been assessed.

INTRODUCTION

A review of the latest evidence available on the diagnostic value of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for the evaluation of HCC is reported.

METHODS

A systematic, comprehensive literature search was conducted with PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, vip, wanfangdata and CBM from inception to June 31, 2020. The QUADAS-2 tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Pooled sensitivity (SEN), pooled specificity (SPE), pooled positive likelihood ratio (PLR), pooled negative likelihood ratio (NLR), pooled diagnostic odds ratio (dOR) and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were calculated to assess the diagnostic value of the individual diagnostic tests.

RESULTS

A total of 47 articles were included, involving a total of 6362 nodules in 37 studies based on per-lesion studies. There were 13 per-patient studies, including a total of 1816 patients. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the per-lesion studies pooled weighted values were SEN 0.90 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87-0.92], SPE 0.92 (95%CI: 0.90-0.94), PLR 11.6 (95%CI: 8.8-15.2), NLR 0.11 (95%CI: 0.09-0.14) and dOR 107.0 (95%CI: 74.0-155.0). The AUC of the SROC curve was 0.96. The per-patient studies pooled weighted values were SEN 0.84 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-0.89], SPE 0.92 (95%CI: 0.88-0.94), PLR 10.4 (95%CI: 7.4-14.6), NLR 0.17 (95%CI: 0.12-0.24) and dOR 61.0 (95%CI: 42.0-87.0). The AUC of the SROC curve was 0.95 and subgroup analyses were performed.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic value of Gd-EOB-DTPA for HCC was quantitatively evaluated in a per-lesion study and a per-patient study using a systematic review of the literature. A positive conclusion was drawn: Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced imaging is a valuable diagnostic technique for HCC. The size of the nodules and the selection of the imaging diagnostic criteria may affect the diagnostic sensitivity.

Overall diagnostic accuracy of different MR imaging sequences for detection of dysplastic nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the overall diagnostic accuracy of different MR imaging sequences in the detection of the dysplastic nodule (DN).

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched. Study selection and data extraction were conducted by two authors independently. Quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) 2 in RevMan software was used to score the included studies and assess their methodological quality. A random-effects model was used for statistical pooling by Meta-Disc. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were used to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies (335 DN lesions in total) were included in our meta-analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) of summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) of T₂WI was 0.87. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) of DWI were 0.81 (95%CI, 0.73-0.87), 0.90 (95%CI, 0.86-0.93), 7.04 (95%CI, 4.49-11.04), and 0.24 (95%CI, 0.17-0.33) respectively. In the arterial phase, pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, and NLR were 0.89 (0.84-0.93), 0.75 (0.72-0.79), 3.72 (2.51-5.51), and 0.17 (0.12-0.25), respectively. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, and NLR of the delayed phase were 0.78 (0.72-0.83), 0.60 (0.55-0.65), 2.19 (1.55-3.10), and 0.36 (0.23-0.55) separately. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, and NLR of the hepatobiliary phase were 0.77 (0.71-0.82), 0.92 (0.89-0.94), 8.74 (5.91-12.92), and 0.24 (0.14-0.41) respectively. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and PLR were higher on DWI and hepatobiliary phase in diagnosing LGDN than HGDN.

CONCLUSION

MR sequences, particularly DWI, arterial phase, and hepatobiliary phase imaging demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy for DN.

KEY POINTS

• MRI has dramatically improved the detection and accurate diagnosis of DNs and their differentiation from hepatocellular carcinoma. • Overall diagnostic accuracy of different MRI sequences in the detection of DN has not been studied before. • Our meta-analysis demonstrates that MRI achieves a high diagnostic value for DN, especially when using DWI, arterial phase imaging, and hepatobiliary phase imaging.

LI-RADS Major Features on MRI for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The reported diagnostic performance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of each major imaging feature on MRI using standardized definitions of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is variable. It is important to know the actual performance of each LI-RADS major imaging feature for imaging diagnosis of HCC and determine the sources of heterogeneity between the reported results.

PURPOSE

To systematically determine the performance of each major imaging feature of LI-RADS for diagnosing HCC using either extracellular contrast agent-enhanced MRI (ECA-MRI) or gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI).

STUDY TYPE

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SUBJECTS

Sixteen original articles with 3542 lesions.

FIELD STRENGTH

A 1.5 T and 3.0 T.

ASSESSMENT

Data extraction was independently performed by two reviewers who identified and reviewed original articles reporting the diagnostic performance of each LI-RADS major imaging feature-arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), observation size, washout appearance, enhancing "capsule," and threshold growth-using MRI. Study characteristics, study population characteristics, MRI characteristics, contrast agent, LI-RADS version, reference standards, and study outcomes were extracted from included studies. Risk of bias and concerns regarding applicability were evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Bivariate random-effects models were used to obtain summary estimates of the diagnostic performance of each LI-RADS major imaging feature. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted. Meta-regression analyses were performed to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

The pooled per-observation sensitivities and specificities for diagnosing HCC were 85% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 78%-89%) and 57% (95% CI = 44%-70%) for arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), 77% (95% CI = 72%-82%), and 74% (95% CI = 63%-83%) for washout appearance, and 52% (95% CI = 41%-64%) and 90% (95% CI = 85%-94%) for enhancing "capsule," respectively.

DATA CONCLUSIONS

Among the LI-RADS major features, the sensitivity was the highest for APHE and the specificity was the highest for enhancing "capsule" in the diagnosis of HCC.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

MR Imaging Contrast Agents: Role in Imaging of Chronic Liver Diseases

Contrast-enhanced MR imaging plays an important role in the evaluation of patients with chronic liver disease, particularly for detection and characterization of liver lesions. The two most commonly used contrast agents for liver MR imaging are extracellular agents (ECAs) and hepatobiliary agents (HBAs). In patients with liver disease, the main advantage of ECA-enhanced MR imaging is its high specificity for the diagnosis of progressed HCCs. Conversely, HBAs have an additional contrast mechanism, which results in high liver-to-lesion contrast and highest sensitivity for lesion detection in the hepatobiliary phase. Emerging data suggest that features depicted on contrast-enhanced MR imaging scans are related to tumor biology and are predictive of patients' prognosis, likely to further expand the role of contrast-enhanced MR imaging in the clinical care of patients with chronic liver disease.

LI-RADS v2018: how to appropriately use ancillary features in category adjustment from intermediate probability of malignancy (LR-3) to probably HCC (LR-4) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI

OBJECTIVES

To determine the appropriate use of ancillary features (AFs) in upgrading LI-RADS category 3 (LR-3) to category 4 (LR-4) for hepatic nodules on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed MRI features of solid hepatic nodules (≤ 30 mm) categorized as LR-3/4 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. In LI-RADS diagnostic table-based-LR-3 observations, logistic regression analyses were performed to identify AFs suggestive of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) rather than non-malignant nodules. Using McNemar's test, the sensitivities and specificities of the final-LR-4 category for HCC diagnosis were compared according to the principles of AF application in category adjustment.

RESULTS

A total of 336 hepatic nodules (191 HCCs; 145 non-malignant) in 252 patients were evaluated. Based on major HCC features, 248 nodules (123 HCCs) were assigned as table-based-LR-3 and 88 nodules (68 HCCs) as table-based-LR-4. In table-based-LR-3 observations, mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity was identified as an independent predictor of HCC as opposed to non-malignant nodules (odds ratio = 3.01, p = 0.002). For HCC diagnosis, different criteria of final-LR-4: only table-based-LR-4, allowing category upgrade using only T2 hyperintensity, or using any AFs favoring malignancy resulted in sensitivities of 35.6% (68/191), 53.9% (103/191), and 88.5% (169/191), and specificities of 86.2% (125/145), 75.9% (110/145), and 21.4% (31/145), respectively, which differed from each other (all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

While the application of MRI AF in LI-RADS category adjustment increases the sensitivity of LR-4 category for HCC diagnosis, it is accompanied by a significant decrease in specificity. Mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity, a significant AF indicative of HCC, may be more appropriate for upgrading LR-3 to LR-4.

KEY POINTS

• When upgrading from LR-3 to LR-4 using any MRI ancillary features favoring malignancy, LR-4 sensitivity increases but specificity decreased for HCC diagnosis. • By upgrading LR-3 to LR-4 based on MRI ancillary features found to suggest HCC rather than non-malignant nodules in multivariate analysis (i.e., mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity), LR-4 demonstrated a more balanced sensitivity and specificity for HCC diagnosis (53.9% and 75.9%, respectively).

Diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Update of the consensus document of the AEEH, AEC, SEOM, SERAM, SERVEI, and SETH

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver neoplasm and one of the most common causes of death in patients with cirrhosis of the liver. In parallel, with recognition of the clinical relevance of this cancer, major new developments have recently appeared in its diagnosis, prognostic assessment and in particular, in its treatment. Therefore, the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver (AEEH) has driven the need to update the clinical practice guidelines, once again inviting all the societies involved in the diagnosis and treatment of this disease to participate in the drafting and approval of the document: Spanish Society for Liver Transplantation (SETH), Spanish Society of Diagnostic Radiology (SERAM), Spanish Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (SERVEI), Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC) and Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM). The clinical practice guidelines published in 2016 and accepted as National Health System Clinical Practice Guidelines were taken as the reference documents, incorporating the most important recent advances. The scientific evidence and the strength of the recommendation is based on the GRADE system.

Feasibility of automatic detection of small hepatocellular carcinoma (≤2 cm) in cirrhotic liver based on pattern matching and deep learning

Background and objective.Early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is crucial for clinical management. Current studies have reported large HCC detections using automatic algorithms, but there is a lack of research on automatic detection of small HCCs (sHCCs). This study is to investigate the feasibility of automatic detection of sHCC (≤2 cm) based on pattern matching and deep learning (PM-DL) model.Materials and methods. A retrospective study included 5376 image sets from 56 cirrhosis patients (28 sHCC patients with 32 pathologically confirmed lesions and 28 non-HCC cirrhosis patients) in the training-validation cohort to build and validate the model through five-fold cross-validation. In addition, an external test cohort including 6144 image sets from 64 cirrhosis patients (32 sHCC patients with 38 lesions and 32 non-HCC cirrhosis patients) was applied to further verify the generalization ability of the model. The proposed PM-DL model consisted of three main steps: 3D co-registration and liver segmentation, screening of suspicious lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging images based on pattern matching algorithm, and identification/segmentation of sHCC lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced images with convolutional neural network.Results.The PM-DL model achieved a sensitivity of 89.74% and a positive predictive value of 85.00% in the external test cohort for per-lesion analysis. No significant difference was observed in volumes (P= 0.13) and the largest sizes (P= 0.89) between manually delineated and segmented lesions. The DICE coefficient reached 0.77 ± 0.16. Similar performances were identified in the validation cohort. Moreover, the PM-DL model outperformed Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in sensitivity (probable HCCs: LR-5 or LR-4,P= 0.18; definite HCCs: LR-5,P< 0.001), with a similar high specificity for per-patient analysis.Conclusion. The PM-DL model may be feasible for accurate automatic detection of sHCC in cirrhotic liver.

Is There a Difference Between LI-RADS 3 to LI-RADS 5 Progression Assessment Using CT Versus MR? A Retrospective, Single-Center, Longitudinal Study of Patients Who Underwent 5082 Radiologic Examinations for Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Over a 43-Month Period

OBJECTIVE

The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) has been widely applied to CT and MR liver observations in patients at high-risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We investigated the impact of CT vs MR in upgrading LI-RADS 3 to LI-RADS 5 observations using a large cohort of high-risk patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, longitudinal study of CT and MR radiographic reports (June 2013 - February 2017) with an assigned LI-RADS category. A final population of 757 individual scans and 212 high-risk patients had at least one LI-RADS 3 observation. Differences in observation time to progression between modalities were determined using uni- and multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 212 patients with a LI-RADS 3 observation, 52 (25%) had progression to LI-RADS 5. Tp ranged from 64 - 818 days (median: 196 days). One hundred and three patients (49%) had MR and 109 patients (51%) had CT as their index study. Twenty-four patients with an MR index exam progressed to LI-RADS 5 during the follow-up interval, with progression rates of 22% (CI:13%-30%) at 1 year and 29% (CI:17%-40%) at 2 years. Twenty-eight patients with a CT index exam progressed to LI-RADS 5 during follow-up, with progression rates of 26% (CI:16%-35%) at 1 year and 31% (CI:19%-41%) at 2 years. Progression rates were not significantly different between patients whose LI-RADS 3 observation was initially diagnosed on MR vs CT (HR: 0.81, P = 0.44).

DISCUSSION

MR and CT modalities are comparable for demonstrating progression from LI-RADS 3 to 5 for high risk patients.

Uptake of gadoxetic acid in hepatobiliary phase magnetic resonance imaging and transporter expression in hypovascular hepatocellular nodules

AIMS

To evaluate the association between contrast patterns on gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatobiliary phase (HBP) MR images and transporter expression in surgically resected hypovascular hepatocellular nodules including early hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs).

METHODS

Forty-two hypovascular hepatic nodules and 43 hypervascular HCCs as a control were included in this retrospective study. Contrast of the nodules on HBP images was graded as hypo-, iso-, or hyperintense. Histopathological assessment was performed in the context of multistep hepatocarcinogenesis. Immunohistochemical staining of organic anion transporter 1B3 (OATP1B3) and multidrug resistance protein 2 (MRP2) was performed. Cramer's coefficient was used to determine the linear relationship between contrast grades and transporter expression, and the Cochran-Armitage trend test was used to determine the relationship between transporter expression and progression of multistep hepatocarcinogenesis.

RESULTS

Moderate linear relationships between contrast grades and OATP1B3 expression were observed for both hypo- and hypervascular nodules. OATP1B3 expression was negatively correlated with the progression of multistep hepatocarcinogenesis. MRP2 expression was not associated with the contrast grades or histopathological results.

CONCLUSION

OATP1B3 expression was associated with contrast grades of hepatocellular nodules observed in HBP image of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in the hypovascular hepatocellular nodules and was negatively correlated with hepatocarcinogenesis.

Early radiological response evaluation with response evaluation criteria in solid tumors 1.1 stratifies survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with lenvatinib

Background and Aim

Lenvatinib (LEN) has an antitumor effect with an early reduction in contrast enhancement for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to reveal the most useful radiological response evaluation for overall survival (OS) in patients treated with LEN.

Methods

Patients receiving LEN therapy (n = 80) were retrospectively recruited from April 2018 to January 2020. Enhanced computed tomography scans were performed at baseline and every 4-8 weeks. OS and radiological response were evaluated using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST 1.1), modified RECIST (mRECIST), and Choi criteria. To be eligible for study, a minimal cumulative duration of LEN was 4 weeks. A total of 62 patients were included in the analysis.

Results

The median OS was 469 days. The RECIST 1.1, mRECIST, and Choi criteria identified 14 (22.5%), 30 (48.3%), and 33 (53.2%) patients with an objective response, respectively. In the univariate analysis, Child-Pugh class B, major vascular invasion, and high alpha-fetoprotein (>200) were statistically significant poor prognostic factors. Radiological response was a significantly better prognostic factor in each criterion (RECIST, mRECIST, and Choi). In the multivariate analysis, radiological response evaluated by RECIST (hazard ratio, 0.259; 95% confidence interval, 0.0723-0.928; P = 0.038) was an independent factor. Furthermore, only RECIST significantly stratified prognosis (P = 0.041) when limited to the first evaluation.

Conclusion

RECIST 1.1 was useful even as early therapeutic evaluation for HCC patients treated with LEN. Understanding the characteristics of radiological response over time may contribute to improving the prognosis of patients with HCC.

Strategy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma based on liver function and portal vein tumor thrombosis

AIM

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy resulted in better prognosis for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, some cases with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C disease still had poor prognosis. This study aimed to investigate prognosis and characteristics of patients with HCC treated with TKI based on liver function and the extent of portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT).

METHODS

Patients receiving TKI therapy (n = 345) were recruited retrospectively. Child-Pugh score and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score were used for assessment of liver function. The extent of PVTT was classified from Vp0 to Vp4. Radiotherapy or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy were carried out as additional therapy to TKI. The end-point for this analysis was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 291 and 54 patients received sorafenib and lenvatinib as first-line TKI therapy, respectively. The median OS of patients treated with TKI were significantly stratified by ALBI grade (grade 1, 20.1 months; grade 2a, 16.3 months; grades 2b and 3, 9.8 months; P = 0.0003). The classification of PVTT significantly stratified the prognosis of patients treated with TKI (median OS: Vp0, 18.5 months; Vp1/2, 14.4 months; Vp3/4, 5.5 months; P < 0.0001). In the ALBI 2b/3 and Vp3/4 groups, the median OS of patients treated with TKI and additional therapies was significantly longer than those treated with TKI only (9.2 months vs.. 3.6 months; P = 0.0129).

CONCLUSION

Liver function and PVTT are useful for stratifying prognosis of HCC patients treated with TKI. The applicative classification could lead to appropriate therapy and better prognosis.

A Comparison of Biannual Two-Phase Low-Dose Liver CT and US for HCC Surveillance in a Group at High Risk of HCC Development

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Biannual ultrasonography (US) is a current recommendation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance in a high-risk group. The sensitivity of US, however, has been low in patients with a high risk of developing HCC. We aimed to compare sensitivity for HCC of biannual US and two-phase low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in patients with a high risk of HCC.

METHODS

In this prospective single-arm study, participants with an annual risk of HCC greater than 5% (based on a risk index of ≥2.33) and who did not have a history of HCC were enrolled from November 2014 to July 2016. Participants underwent paired biannual US and two-phase LDCT 1-3 times. Two-phase LDCT included arterial and 3-min delayed phases. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of HCC detection using US and two-phase LDCT were compared using a composite algorithm as a standard of reference.

RESULTS

Of the 139 enrolled participants, 137 underwent both the biannual US and two-phase LDCT at least once and had follow-up images. Among them, 27 cases of HCC (mean size: 14 ± 4 mm) developed in 24 participants over 1.5 years. Two-phase LDCT showed a significantly higher sensitivity (83.3% [20/24] vs. 29.2% [7/24], p < 0.001) and specificity (95.6% [108/113] vs. 87.7% [99/113], p =0.03) than US. A false-positive result was reported in 14 participants at US and 5 participants at two-phase LDCT, resulting in a significantly higher positive predictive value of two-phase LDCT (33.3% [7/21] vs. 80% [20/25], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a risk index ≥2.33 showed a high annual incidence of HCC development in our study, and two-phase LDCT showed significantly higher sensitivity and specificity for HCC detection than US.

Diagnosis of Pre-HCC Disease by Hepatobiliary-Specific Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Review

We first proposed a new concept, pre-hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) disease, to describe the precancerous condition of HCC, which has received scant attention from clinicians. Pre-HCC disease is defined as chronic liver injury concurrent with hepatic low- or high-grade dysplastic nodular lesions. Precise diagnosis of pre-HCC disease may prevent or arrest HCC and contribute to relieving the HCC burden worldwide, although noninvasive diagnosis is difficult and biopsy is generally required. Fortunately, recent advances and extensive applications of hepatobiliary-specific contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging will facilitate the noninvasive identification and characterization of pre-HCC disease. This review briefly discusses the new concept of pre-HCC disease and offers an overview of the role of hepatobiliary-specific contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of pre-HCC disease.

Aberrant gastric venous drainage and associated atrophy of hepatic segment II: computed tomography analysis of 2021 patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the prevalence and patterns of aberrant gastric venous drainage and associated atrophy of the hepatic segment on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed contrast-enhanced CT images from 2021 patients who underwent cone-beam CT-guided chemoembolization between January 2013 and December 2018. They determined the presence or absence of an aberrant gastric vein(s) and its drainage site by consensus, and qualitatively analyzed the presence or absence of atrophy of segments II or III. In cases of disagreement between the two reviewers regarding the presence of atrophy, quantitative analysis was performed using dedicated software.

RESULTS

A total of 31 aberrant right gastric veins were revealed on CT (1.5%), most of which drained into P2 (n = 8), the S2/3 border zone (n = 8), S2 (n = 6), or S4 (n = 5). An aberrant left gastric vein was observed in 21 (1.0%) patients, and P2 was the most common drainage site (n = 13) in these patients. Atrophy of segment II was more frequently observed among patients with aberrant gastric veins than among those without (26.9% versus 4.1%; p < 0.001). In addition, an aberrant gastric vein draining into P2 was most frequently accompanied by segment II atrophy (47.6%).

CONCLUSION

Aberrant right and left gastric veins were observed in 1.5% and 1.0% of patients, respectively. Atrophy of segment II was frequently observed in patients with aberrant gastric veins, especially those that drained into P2.

Intra-individual comparison of dual portal venous phases for non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma at gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic performances of first and second portal venous phases (PVP1 and PVP2) in revealing washout and capsule appearance for non-invasive HCC diagnoses in gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 123 at-risk patients with 160 hepatic observations (HCCs, n = 116; non-HCC malignancies, n = 18; benign, n = 26) showing arterial phase hyper-enhancement (APHE) ≥ 1 cm at Gd-EOB-MRI. The mean time intervals from gadoxetic acid injection to PVP1 and PVP2 acquisitions were 53 ± 2 s and 73 ± 3 s, respectively. After evaluating image findings independently, imaging findings and diagnoses were finalized by a consensus of two radiologists using either PVP1 or PVP2 image sets according to the LI-RADS v2018 or EASL criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were compared.

RESULTS

Among HCCs, more washout and enhancing capsule were observed in PVP2 (83.6% and 27.6%) than in PVP1 (50.9% and 19.8%) (p < 0.001, both). The PVP2 set presented significantly higher sensitivity (83.6% vs. 53.5%, LI-RADS; 82.8% vs. 50.0%, EASL; p < 0.001, both) and accuracy (0.88 vs. 0.73, LI-RADS; 0.88 vs. 0.72, EASL; p < 0.001, both) than the PVP1 set without significant specificity loss (93.2% vs. 93.2%, by LI-RADS or EASL; p = 0.32, both). None of the non-HCC malignancy was non-invasively diagnosed as HCC in both PVP image sets.

CONCLUSION

Late acquisition of PVP detected washout and enhancing capsule of HCC more sensitively than early acquisition, enabling accurate diagnoses of HCC, according to LI-RADS or EASL criteria.

KEY POINTS

• Among HCCs, more washout and enhancing capsules were observed in PVP2 than PVP1, quantitatively and qualitatively. • The portal venous phase acquired at around 70 s after contrast media administration (PVP2) provided significantly higher sensitivity and AUC value than PVP1 by using LI-RADS v2018 or EASL criteria. • More HCCs were categorized as LR-5 in PVP2 than in PVP1 images, and the specificity of PVP2 (93.5%) was comparable with PVP1 (93.5%).

Application of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common malignant tumor of the liver, and its morbidity and mortality have been increasing in recent years. The early diagnosis and prompt treatment of small HCC are crucial to improve the prognosis and quality of life of patients. In China, hepatitis B virus infection is the main cause. HCC with a single tumor nodule of ≤ 3 cm in diameter, or HCC with a number of nodules, in which each nodule is ≤ 2 cm in diameter, with a total diameter of ≤ 3 cm, is considered as small HCC. The MRI liver-specific contrast agent can detect small HCC at the early stage. This has important clinical implications for improving the survival rate of patients.

MAIN BODY

Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI can significantly improve the sensitivity and specificity of the detection of HBV-related small hepatocellular carcinoma, providing an important basis for the clinical selection of appropriate personalized treatment. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI can reflect the degree of HCC differentiation, and the evaluation of HCC on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI would be helpful for the selection of the treatment and prognosis of HCC patients. The present study reviews the progress of the application of Gd-EOB-DTPA in the early diagnosis of small HCC, its clinical treatment, the prediction of the degree of differentiation, and the assessment of recurrence and prognosis of HCC, including the pharmacoeconomics and application limitations of Gd-EOB-DTPA. The value of the application of HCC with the Gd-EOB-DTPA was summarized to provide information for improving the quality of life and prolonging the survival of patients.

CONCLUSION

Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI has the diagnostic capability for small HCC with a diameter of ≤ 2 cm. This will have a broader application prospect in the early diagnosis of small liver cancer with a diameter of ≤ 1 cm in the future. The relationship between GD-EOB-DTPA-MRI and the degree of HCC differentiation has a large research space, and Gd-EOB-DTPA is expected to become a potential tool for the preoperative prediction and postoperative evaluation of HCC, which would be beneficial for more appropriate treatments for HCC patients.

Evaluation of Primary Liver Cancers Using Hepatocyte-Specific Contrast-Enhanced MRI: Pitfalls and Potential Tips

When radiologists interpret hepatic focal lesions seen on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, it is important not only to distinguish malignant lesions from benign ones but also to distinguish nonhepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) malignancies from HCCs. In addition, most major guidelines, including those of the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease, European Association for the Study of the Liver, and Korean Liver Cancer Association and National Cancer Center, allow for the noninvasive imaging diagnosis of HCC in at-risk patients. However, ~40% of HCC cases show atypical imaging features mimicking non-HCC malignancies. Furthermore, several benign and malignant lesions, such as flash-filling hemangioma and intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma, frequently look like HCC. In contrast, although multiparametric MRI options, including hepatobiliary phase and diffusion-weighted imaging, provide useful information that could help address these challenges, there remain several unresolved issues with regard to the noninvasive diagnostic criteria characterizing HCC. In this article, we discuss the typical imaging features and challenging situations related to primary liver cancers in MRI, while considering how to make a correct diagnosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3.

Multiphase convolutional dense network for the classification of focal liver lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography

BACKGROUND

The accurate classification of focal liver lesions (FLLs) is essential to properly guide treatment options and predict prognosis. Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (DCE-CT) is still the cornerstone in the exact classification of FLLs due to its noninvasive nature, high scanning speed, and high-density resolution. Since their recent development, convolutional neural network-based deep learning techniques has been recognized to have high potential for image recognition tasks.

AIM

To develop and evaluate an automated multiphase convolutional dense network (MP-CDN) to classify FLLs on multiphase CT.

METHODS

A total of 517 FLLs scanned on a 320-detector CT scanner using a four-phase DCE-CT imaging protocol (including precontrast phase, arterial phase, portal venous phase, and delayed phase) from 2012 to 2017 were retrospectively enrolled. FLLs were classified into four categories: Category A, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); category B, liver metastases; category C, benign non-inflammatory FLLs including hemangiomas, focal nodular hyperplasias and adenomas; and category D, hepatic abscesses. Each category was split into a training set and test set in an approximate 8:2 ratio. An MP-CDN classifier with a sequential input of the four-phase CT images was developed to automatically classify FLLs. The classification performance of the model was evaluated on the test set; the accuracy and specificity were calculated from the confusion matrix, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated from the SoftMax probability outputted from the last layer of the MP-CDN.

RESULTS

A total of 410 FLLs were used for training and 107 FLLs were used for testing. The mean classification accuracy of the test set was 81.3% (87/107). The accuracy/specificity of distinguishing each category from the others were 0.916/0.964, 0.925/0.905, 0.860/0.918, and 0.925/0.963 for HCC, metastases, benign non-inflammatory FLLs, and abscesses on the test set, respectively. The AUC (95% confidence interval) for differentiating each category from the others was 0.92 (0.837-0.992), 0.99 (0.967-1.00), 0.88 (0.795-0.955) and 0.96 (0.914-0.996) for HCC, metastases, benign non-inflammatory FLLs, and abscesses on the test set, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MP-CDN accurately classified FLLs detected on four-phase CT as HCC, metastases, benign non-inflammatory FLLs and hepatic abscesses and may assist radiologists in identifying the different types of FLLs.

Atypical Appearance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Its Mimickers: How to Solve Challenging Cases Using Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be diagnosed noninvasively with contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or ultrasonography on the basis of its hallmark imaging features of arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout on portal or delayed phase images. However, approximately 40% of HCCs show atypical imaging features, posing a significant diagnostic challenge for radiologists. Another challenge for radiologists in clinical practice is the presentation of many HCC mimickers such as intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, combined HCC-cholangiocarcinoma, arterioportal shunt, and hemangioma in the cirrhotic liver. The differentiation of HCCs from these mimickers on preoperative imaging studies is of critical importance. Hence, we will review the typical and atypical imaging features of HCCs and the imaging features of its common mimickers. In addition, we will discuss how to solve these challenges in practice.

Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation of Hepatobiliary Phase Hypointense Nodules without Arterial Phase Hyperenhancement at Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MRI: A Multicenter Study

Background Hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointense nodules without arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI may indicate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or nonmalignant cirrhosis-associated nodules. Purpose To assess the distribution of pathologic diagnoses of HBP hypointense nodules without APHE at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and to evaluate clinical and imaging features in differentiating their histologic grades. Materials and Methods This retrospective multicenter study included pathologic analysis-confirmed HBP hypointense nodules without APHE (≤30 mm) in patients with chronic liver disease or cirrhosis screened between January 2008 and June 2016. Central pathologic review by 10 pathologists determined final histologic grades as progressed HCC, early HCC, high-grade dysplastic nodule (DN), and low-grade DN or regenerative nodule. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI features were analyzed by three radiologists. Multivariable logistic regression analyses with elastic net regularization were performed to identify clinical and imaging features for differentiating histologic grades. Results There were 298 patients (mean age, 59 years ± 10; 226 men) with 334 nodules evaluated, and progressed HCCs were diagnosed in 44.0% (147 of 334), early HCCs in 20.4% (68 of 334), high-grade DNs in 27.5% (92 of 334), and low-grade DNs or regenerative nodules in 8.1% (27 of 334). Serum α-fetoprotein level 100 ng/mL or greater (odds ratio, 2.7; P = .01) and MRI features including well-defined margin (odds ratio, 5.5; P = .003), hypointensity at precontrast T1-weighted imaging (odds ratio, 3.2; P < .001), intermediate hyperintensity at T2-weighted imaging (odds ratio, 3.4; P < .001), and restricted diffusion (odds ratio, 1.9; P = .04) were independent predictors for progressed HCC at multivariable analysis. Conclusion In patients at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), hepatobiliary phase hypointense nodules without arterial phase hyperenhancement at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI corresponded mainly to progressed HCCs, early HCCs, and high-grade dysplastic nodules. High α-fetoprotein level and some imaging features at MRI helped to differentiate progressed HCC from lower grade nodules. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Motosugi in this issue.