Advanced Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Treatment with Sorafenib Alone or in Combination with Transarterial Chemoembolization and Radiofrequency Ablation

Prognostic implications of CK19 positivity in patients with early recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatic resection undergoing transarterial chemoembolization

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the survival outcomes of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) between patients with early recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) after hepatic resection, stratified by cytokeratin (CK) 19 expression.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 63 patients with early rHCC after hepatic resection who underwent TACE between January 2017 and December 2021. Patients were divided into two groups based on CK19 expression: CK19-negative (n=31) and CK19-positive (n=32). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between the two groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for OS and PFS.

RESULTS

The CK19-negative group demonstrated a significantly longer median OS compared to the CK19-positive group (635 days vs. 432 days, p=0.013). Similarly, the CK19-negative group had a longer median PFS than the CK19-positive group (291 days vs. 117 days, p=0.014). Multivariate Cox analysis identified Child-Pugh A grade, CK19-negative expression, and increased TACE sessions as protective factors for OS. No severe TACE-related adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

In patients with early rHCC after hepatic resection, those with CK19-positive expression had poorer survival outcomes following TACE compared to CK19-negative patients. These findings suggest the need for additional therapies to improve survival in CK19-positive individuals.

Immune-targeted therapy with transarterial chemo(embolization) for unresectable HCC: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Transarterial chemo(embolization) is preferred for treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC); however, because of emerging immune-targeted therapies, its efficacy is at stake. This systematic review pioneers to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of transarterial chemo(embolization) combined with immune-targeted therapy for uHCC patients.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing immune-targeted therapy with or without transarterial chemo(embolization) until 31 May 2024. The complete response (CR) rate, objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were considered to be the primary outcomes calculated for the clinical outcomes of transarterial chemo(embolization) combined with immune-targeted therapy, along with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The incidence of treatment-related severe adverse events was set as the major measure for the safety outcome.

Results

Sixteen studies, encompassing 1,789 patients receiving transarterial chemo(embolization) plus immune-targeted therapy and 1,215 patients receiving immune-targeted therapy alone, were considered eligible. The combination of transarterial chemo(embolization) and immune-targeted therapy demonstrated enhanced outcomes in CR (OR = 2.12, 95% CI = 1.35-3.31), ORR (OR = 2.78, 95% CI = 2.15-3.61), DCR (OR = 2.46, 95% CI = 1.72-3.52), PFS (HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.50-0.70), and OS (HR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.44-0.59), albeit accompanied by a surge in ALT (OR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.28-3.68) and AST (OR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.42-3.65). The advantages of additional transarterial chemo(embolization) to immune-targeted therapy were also verified in subgroups of first-line treatment, intervention techniques, with or without extrahepatic metastasis, Child-Pugh grade A or B, and with or without tumor thrombus.

Conclusion

The combination of transarterial chemo(embolization) and immune-targeted therapy seems to bolster local control and long-term efficacy in uHCC, albeit at the expense of hepatic complications.

Systematic review registration

http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier 474669.

Radiofrequency ablation combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for recurrent liver cancer

BACKGROUND

The recurrence rate of liver cancer after surgery is high. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is an effective treatment for liver cancer; however, its efficacy in recurrent liver cancer remains unclear.

AIM

To investigate the clinical effect of TACE combined with RFA in the treatment of recurrent liver cancer.

METHODS

Ninety patients with recurrent liver cancer were divided into 2 groups according to treatment plan: Control (RFA alone); and experimental [TACE combined with RFA (TACE + RFA)]. The incidence of increased alanine aminotransferase levels, complications, and other indices were compared between the two groups before and after the procedures.

RESULTS

One month after the procedures, the short-term efficacy rate and Karnofsky Performance Status scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P < 0.05). Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and total bilirubin levels were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05); The overall response rate was 82.22% and 66.67% in the experimental and control groups, respectively; The disease control rate was 93.33% and 82.22% in the experimental and control groups, respectively, the differences are statistically significant (P < 0.05). And there were no statistical differences in complications between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

TACE + RFA was effective for the treatment of recurrent liver cancer and significantly reduced AFP levels and improved various indices of liver function.

Efficacy of Lenvatinib Combined with PD-1 Inhibitor versus Sorafenib and PD-1 Inhibitor with or Without TACE for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Extrahepatic Metastasis

Background

Lenvatinib or Sorafenib combined with programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor as recommend treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with extrahepatic metastasis (EHM). We aimed to compared the prognosis of Lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor (Len+PD-1) versus Sorafenib plus PD-1 (Sora+PD-1) as an initial therapy for HCC with EHM.

Methods

Incorporating a sum of 229 HCC patients with EHM were encompassed within this study, with 127 in the Sora+PD-1 group and 102 in the Len+PD-1 group. Through propensity score matching (PSM), we compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and patient safety between these two groups.

Results

The median OS were 13.0 months and 14.2 months in the Sora+PD-1 group and Len+PD-1 group. The 6-, 12-, and 24-month OS rates were 92.9%, 58.9% and 5.6% in Sora+PD-1 group and 93.1%, 61.8% and 22.6% in Len+PD-1 group, respectively. The Len+PD-1 group had obviously better OS than the Sora+PD-1 group (P = 0.002). The 3-, 6-, and 12-month PFS rates were 76.4%, 27.6% and 1.6% in Sora+PD-1 group and 86.2%, 50.5% and 12.2% in Len+PD-1 group, respectively. Compared with Sora+PD-1 group, the Len+PD-1 group had obviously better PFS (P < 0.001). Analysis within subgroups showed that OS was significant in patients receiving TACE in Len+PD-1 group than Sora+PD-1 group (p = 0.003).

Conclusion

Len+PD-1 group had longer OS and PFS than Sora+PD-1 group for patient with EHM. In addition, OS in patients received TACE was improved with Len+PD-1 treatment. For patients without TACE, there was no significance between Sora+PD-1 and Len+PD-1 groups.

Efficacy of radiation plus transarterial chemoembolization and lenvatinib in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus

Background

We aimed to investigate the efficacy of a novel regimen, external beam radiation (RT) combined with trans arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and lenvatinib (LEN), in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus.

Methods

We prospectively observed 102 participants from three tertiary medical centers in China between October 2018 and October 2020, who chose either RT plus TACE and LEN (RT-TACE-LEN) or TACE and LEN (TACE-LEN). LEN (12 mg or 8 mg daily) was administrated orally and continued until progression or intolerable side effects were noted. TACE was given one day after administration of LEN, and RT began within 4 weeks after the first TACE. The median dose/fraction of RT was 50 Gy/25 fractions (range: 45-60 Gy/25 fractions). Overall survival and progression free survival were compared between two groups, and complications were assessed.

Results

Both 51 patients received RT-TACE-LEN and TACE-LEN, respectively. Most patients had tumor size> 5 cm (73.8%) and tumor number≥ 2 (69.9%). The overall incidence of toxicities was significantly higher in RT-TACE-LEN group than TACE-LEN group (100% vs. 64.7%, p< 0.001), but incidences of grade 3-4 toxicities were comparable (54.9% vs. 49.0%, p= 0.552). Both median overall survival (22.8 vs. 17.1 months, p= 0.031) and median progression-free survival (12.8 vs. 10.5 months, p= 0.035) were significantly longer after RT-TACE-LEN treatment than TACE-LEN.

Conclusions

The addition of RT to TACE and LEN was safe, and might improve clinical outcomes of patients with advanced HCC, which needs conformation from further studies.

The current role of radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of intrahepatic recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

The incidence of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after initial curative treatments is relatively high. However, there is still the lack of standard management of recurrent HCC. Among several treatment modalities for primary HCC, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) seems to be more widely used for intrahepatic recurrent lesions. Therefore, we provide a comprehensive review of the current and novel application of RFA for recurrent HCC in all stages after curative treatment of primary HCC.

Nomogram for predicting overall survival in patients with large (>5 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma based on real-world practice

BACKGROUND/AIM

Patients with large (>5 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have limited treatment options, thus necessitating the identification of prognostic factors and the development of predictive tools. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors and to construct a nomogram to predict survival outcomes in patients with large HCC.

METHODS

A cohort of 438 patients, who were diagnosed with large HCC at a tertiary hospital between 2015 and 2018, was analyzed. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify key prognosticators of overall survival (OS), and an independent set of prognostic factors was used to develop a nomogram. The discrimination and calibration abilities of the nomogram were assessed and internal validation was performed using cross-validation and bootstrapping methods.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 9.3 months, the median OS was 9.9 months, and the 1-year OS rate was 43.9%. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that performance status, modified albumin-bilirubin grade, tumor size, extent of portal vein tumor thrombosis, and initial treatment significantly affected OS. The newly developed nomogram incorporating these variables demonstrated favorable accuracy (Harrell's concordance index, 0.807).

CONCLUSIONS

The newly developed nomogram facilitated the estimation of individual survival outcomes in patients with large HCC, providing an acceptable level of accuracy.

Optimal treatment strategy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma based on recurrence time and tumor size: A propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND

Recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) is commonly treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with microwave ablation (MWA) or repeated hepatectomy(RH), but the optimal treatment strategy is still controversial. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of TACE-MWA and RH in RHCC patients after initial radical hepatectomy.

METHODS

A total of 210 RHCC patients were included between June 2014 and January 2021, with 126 patients in the TACE-MWA group and 84 patients in the RH group. The primary endpoints were median repeat recurrence-free survival (rRFS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was complications. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was conducted to minimize bias. Subgroup analysis based on recurrence patterns (recurrence time and tumor size) was performed, and prognostic factors were studied.

RESULTS

Before PSM, the RH group had better median OS (37.0 vs 26.0 months, P<0.001) and rRFS (15.0 vs 14.0 months, P = 0.003). After PSM, the RH group also had a better median OS (33.5 vs 29.0 months, P = 0.038), but there was no significant difference in median rRFS between the two groups (14.0 vs 13.0 months, P = 0.099). Subgroup analysis showed that when RHCC diameter>5 cm, RH had a better median OS (33.5 vs 25.0 months, P = 0.013) and rRFS (14.0 vs 10.9 months, P = 0.030). When the RHCC diameter was≤5 cm, there was no significant difference in the median OS (37.0 vs 31.0 months, P = 0.338) and rRFS (15.0 vs 17.0 months, P = 0.758) between the two groups. When RHCC relapses in the early stage (≤2 years), there is no significant difference in the median OS (26.0 vs 26.0 months, P = 0.310) and rRFS (12.0 vs 10.5 months, P = 0.089) between the two groups. When RHCC relapses in the late stage (>2 years), the RH group has better median OS (41.0 vs 33.0 months, P<0.001) and rRFS (30.0 vs 20.0 months, P = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

Individualized therapy is necessary for RHCC. TACE -MWA may be a good choice for RHCC with early recurrence or tumor diameter ≤5 cm. However, RH should be the first choice for RHCC with late recurrence or tumor diameter>5 cm.

Chemoembolization combined radiofrequency ablation vs. chemoembolization alone for treatment of beyond the Milan criteria viable hepatocellular carcinoma (CERFA): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Many previous studies evaluated a combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for treating early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, studies evaluating combination therapy for beyond-the-Milan criteria HCC are scarce.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients with beyond-the-Milan criteria HCC who have viable tumour after first TACE will be enrolled in this multi-institutional, parallel, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial. Patients with metastasis, vascular invasion, or a sum of tumour diameter > 8 cm will be excluded. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to combination TACE and RFA therapy or TACE monotherapy groups. Patients in the combination therapy group will receive a second TACE and subsequent RFA at the viable tumour. Patients in the TACE monotherapy group will receive only second TACE. Patients in both groups will undergo magnetic resonance imaging 4-6 weeks after second TACE. The primary endpoint is 1-month tumour response, and secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, overall response rate, number of treatments until CR, overall survival, and change in liver function.

DISCUSSION

Although TACE can be used to treat intermediate-stage HCC, it is difficult to achieve CR by first TACE in most intermediate-stage patients. Recent studies show a survival advantage of combination therapy over monotherapy. However, most studies evaluating combination therapy included patients with a single tumour sized < 5 cm, and no studies included patients with intermediate-stage but more advanced (i.e., beyond-the-Milan criteria) HCC. This study will evaluate the efficacy of combined TACE and RFA therapy for patients with advanced HCC within the intermediate stage.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Research Information Service (CRiS) KCT0006483.

Radiological findings in non-surgical recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: From locoregional treatments to immunotherapy

Since hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents an important cause of mortality and morbidity all over the world. Currently, it is fundamental not only to achieve a curative treatment but also to manage in the best way any possible recurrence. Even if the latest update of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer guidelines for HCC treatment has introduced new locoregional techniques and confirmed others as well-established clinical practices, there is still no consensus about the treatment of recurrent HCC (RHCC). Locoregional treatments and medical therapy represent two of the most widely accepted approaches for disease control, especially in the advanced stage of liver disease. Different medical treatments are now approved, and others are under investigation. On this basis, radiology plays a central role in the diagnosis of RHCC and the assessment of response to locoregional treatments and medical therapy for RHCC. This review summarized the actual clinical practice by underlining the importance of the radiological approach both in the diagnosis and treatment of RHCC.

Efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with lenvatinib and sequential ablation in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

Evaluate the efficacy and safety of triple therapeutic method (Hepatic Aarterial Infusion Chemotherapy-HAIC, lenvatinib and sequential ablation) in the treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular carcinoma (Ad-HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From November 2018 to June 2021, data from 150 consecutive Ad-HCC patients were collected. All patients received HAIC combined with lenvatinib (H-L group, n = 97) or HAIC combined with lenvatinib and sequential ablation (H-L-A group, n = 53). Complications, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and intrahepatic progression-free survival (IPFS) were compared between both groups.

RESULTS

No significant differences of baseline characteristics were found between groups. The time of median follow-up was 17.8 months (range, 6.8, 37.6 months). In comparison to the H-L group, the H-L-A group patients showed significantly longer median OS (>30 months vs 13.6 months, respectively; p = 0.010), PFS (12.8 vs. 5.6 months, respectively; p < 0.001), and IPFS (14.6 vs. 6.8 months, respectively; p = 0.002). According to the results from uni- and multivariable analyses, we considered α-fetoprotein and treatment modality as two survival independent prognostic factors. No significant change of the complication incidences was observed between H-L group and H-L-A group (12.4% vs. 11.3%, p = 0.890).

CONCLUSION

Compared to HAIC combined with lenvatinib only, HAIC combined with lenvatinib and sequential ablation was safer and more effective, improving survival outcomes of Ad-HCC patients. A prospective study will be designed validate the retrospective results.

CT-guided 125I brachytherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk locations after transarterial chemoembolization combined with microwave ablation: a propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ¹²⁵I brachytherapy combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and microwave ablation (MWA) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk locations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM), this retrospectively study analyzed 49 patients who underwent TACE +MWA+¹²⁵I brachytherapy (group A) and 98 patients who only received TACE +MWA (group B). The evaluated outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment complications. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis survival was used to compare the two groups.

RESULTS

The patients in group A showed a longer PFS than group B (7.9 vs. 3.3 months, P = 0.007). No significant differences were observed in median OS between the two groups (P = 0.928). The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate of tumors in high-risk locations, and the ORR of intrahepatic tumors were 67.3%, 93.9%, and 51.0%, respectively, in group A, and 38.8%, 79.6% and 29.6%, respectively, in group B (P < 0.001, P = 0.025 and P = 0.011, respectively). TACE-MWA-¹²⁵I (HR = 0.479, P < 0.001) was a significant favorable prognostic factor that affected PFS. The present of portal vein tumor thrombosis was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (HR = 1.625, P = 0.040). The Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage (BCLC C vs. B) was an independent factor affecting OS (HR = 1.941, P = 0.038). The incidence of complications was similar between the two groups, except that the incidence of abdominal pain was reduced in the group A (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

TACE-MWA-¹²⁵I resulted in longer PFS and better tumor control than did TACE-MWA in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk locations.

Current status and prospect of treatments for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

Owing to its heterogeneous and highly aggressive nature, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a high recurrence rate, which is a non-negligible problem despite the increasing number of available treatment options. Recent clinical trials have attempted to reduce the recurrence and develop innovative treatment options for patients with recurrent HCC. In the event of liver remnant recurrence, the currently available treatment options include repeat hepatectomy, salvage liver transplantation, tumor ablation, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, stereotactic body radiotherapy, systemic therapies, and combination therapy. In this review, we summarize the strategies to reduce the recurrence of high-risk tumors and aggressive therapies for recurrent HCC. Additionally, we discuss methods to prevent HCC recurrence and prognostic models constructed based on predictors of recurrence to develop an appropriate surveillance program.

Efficacy of treatment based on TKIs in combination with PD-1 inhibitors for unresectable recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The recurrence occurs within 5 years in up to 70% of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who received radical liver resection, and most patients are no longer suitable for repeat surgery. There are limited treatment options for unresectable recurrent HCC. This study aimed to explore the potential efficacy of treatment based on TKIs in combination with PD-1 inhibitors for unresectable recurrent HCC.

METHODS

Forty-four patients with unresectable recurrent HCC after radical surgery between January 2017 and November 2022 were retrospectively collected and screened. All patients received the combination therapy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, and 18 of these patients received trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) or TACE combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Two patients who received TKIs in combination with PD-1 inhibitors eventually obtained repeat surgery, with one patient undergoing a repeat hepatectomy and one patient receiving a liver transplant.

RESULTS

The median survival for these patients was 27.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 21.2, 32.8), with a 1-year overall survival (OS) rate of 83.6% (95% CI 77.9%, 89.3%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15.0 months (95.0% CI 12.1, 17.9), with a 1-year PFS rate of 77.0% (95% CI 70.6%, 83.4%). The two patients who underwent repeat surgery had a survival time of 34 and 37 months after the combined treatment with no recurrence, respectively, as of November 2022.

CONCLUSION

The combination of TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors for unresectable recurrent HCC is effective and can prolong the survival of patients in this group.

Application of ablative therapy for intrahepatic recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma following hepatectomy

The post-hepatectomy recurrence rate of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is persistently high, affecting the prognosis of patients. An effective therapeutic option is crucial for achieving long-term survival in patients with postoperative recurrences. Local ablative therapy has been established as a treatment option for resectable and unresectable HCCs, and it is also a feasible approach for recurrent HCC (RHCC) due to less trauma, shorter operation times, fewer complications, and faster recovery. This review focused on ablation techniques, description of potential candidates, and therapeutic and prognostic implications of ablation for guiding its application in treating intrahepatic RHCC.

Salvage locoregional therapies for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Despite the advent of screening efforts and algorithms to stratify patients into appropriate treatment strategies, recurrence rates remain high. In contrast to first-line treatment for HCC, which relies on several factors, including clinical staging, tumor burden, and liver function, there is no consensus or general treatment recommendations for recurrent HCC (R-HCC). Locoregional therapies include a spectrum of minimally invasive liver-directed treatments which can be used as either curative or neoadjuvant therapy for HCC. Herein, we provide a comprehensive review of recent evidence using salvage loco-regional therapies for R-HCC after failed curative-intent.

An overview: Management of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has constituted a significant health burden worldwide, and patients with advanced HCC, which is stage C as defined by the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system, have a poor overall survival of 6-8 months. Studies have indicated the significant survival benefit of treatment based on sorafenib, lenvatinib, or atezolizumab-bevacizumab with reliable safety. In addition, the combination of two or more molecularly targeted therapies (first- plus second-line) has become a hot topic recently and is now being extensively investigated in patients with advanced HCC. In addition, a few biomarkers have been investigated and found to predict drug susceptibility and prognosis, which provides an opportunity to evaluate the clinical benefits of current therapies. In addition, many therapies other than tyrosine kinase inhibitors that might have additional survival benefits when combined with other therapeutic modalities, including immunotherapy, transarterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, hepatectomy, and chemotherapy, have also been examined. This review provides an overview on the current understanding of disease management and summarizes current challenges with and future perspectives on advanced HCC.

Long‐term efficacy of no‐touch radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of single small hepatocellular carcinoma: A single center long‐term follow‐up study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term efficacy of no-touch radiofrequency ablation (NT-RFA) for treating single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) less than 3 cm.

METHODS

A total of 331 patients with HCC less than 3 cm undergoing RFA in Southwest Hospital from 2015 to 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were divided into NT-RFA group (n = 113) and conventional RFA (C-RFA) group (n = 218). The survival rate, local tumor progression (LTP) and intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR) of the two groups were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

A significant difference was observed in ablation range (p = 0.000) and safety margin (p = 0.000) between the two groups. The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates in NT-RFA and C-RFA group were 99.12%, 93.73%, 76.18%, 57.00%, 45.17% and 99.08%, 89.91%, 71.26%, 54.28%, 41.77%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.281). The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates in NT-RFA and C-RFA group were 78.51%, 52.59%, 41.02%, 34.36%, 30.92% and 68.81%, 44.95%, 30.88%, 23.73%, 22.88%, respectively. The two groups differed significantly (p = 0.044). The 1-, 3-and 5-year LTP-free survival rates in NT-RFA and C-RFA group were 87.12%, 74.99%, 72.32% and 75.75%, 65.52%, 65.52%, respectively. The two groups also differed significantly (p = 0.024). Furthermore, the RFS rates of D ≤ 2 cm subgroups in NT-RFA and C-RFA groups differed significantly (p = 0.037), while the RFS rates of 2 cm < D ≤ 3 cm subgroups in two groups showed no significant difference (p = 0.578).

CONCLUSIONS

The RFS rates of single HCC less than 3 cm treated by NT-RFA was significantly higher than that of C-RFA. Due to a larger ablation range and safety margin, NT-RFA could significantly reduce LTP and improve RFS. Dual-electrode NT-RFA can significantly improve the RFS rate of patients with HCC less than 2 cm, but there is no obvious advantage compared with C-RFA in the treatment of HCC over 2 cm.

Synergizing liver systemic treatments with interventional oncology: friend or foe?

Interventional radiology techniques provide excellent local tumor control for small tumors in various organs, but several limitations can hamper the oncological outcomes such as the tumor size or the number of lesions. Technical improvements, optimal patient selection and combination with systemic therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, have been successfully developed to overcome these barriers.In this setting, chemotherapy and targeted therapies aim to diminish the tumor burden in addition to local treatments, while immunotherapies may have a synergistic effect in terms of mechanism of action on the tumor cell as well as the immune environment, with multiple treatment combinations being available. Finally, interventional Rrdiology treatments often increase tumor antigen exposure to the immune system, and thus stimulate a specific antitumor immune response that can act beyond the treated site. Notwithstanding their many benefits, combination treatment may also result in complications, the most feared may be auto-immune-related adverse events.In early studies, several combined therapies have shown promising levels of safety and efficacy, particularly in hepatocellular carcinoma.This review provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of results of combined therapies for primary and secondary liver malignancies. Recent advances and future perspectives will be discussed.

Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Patterns, Detection, Staging and Treatment

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide with the incidence of recurrence being as high as 88% even among patients who have undergone curative-intent treatment. Despite improvements in overall survival, recurrence remains a challenge necessitating accurate reappraisal of patient and disease status. To that end, accurate staging of recurrent HCC is a necessity to provide better care for these patients. Risk factors for poor survival after HCC recurrence have been identified and include characteristics of the primary disease, such as tumor multifocality, large size (≥5 cm), macroscopic vascular or microscopic lymphovascular invasion, preoperative a-fetoprotein (AFP) levels, R0 resection, and the presence of impaired liver function. Close surveillance with imaging is warranted following curative-intent therapy, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) being the preferred approach to identify small, early recurrent HCCs. Treatment decisions at the time of recurrence involve ruling out extrahepatic disease and identifying candidates for potentially curative-intent repeat treatment options. Patients with recurrent disease are, however, very diverse in terms of tumor morphology and biologic behavior, as well as residual hepatic functional reserve. Patients with preserved liver function may benefit from repeat liver resection or ablation. Patients with recurrence within the Milan criteria may even be candidates for salvage liver transplantation, while multimodality treatment with combination of liver-directed therapies appears to enhance oncologic outcomes for individuals with advanced recurrent disease. A “one-size-fits-all” approach in staging recurrent HCC does not exist. Rather, individualized and evidence-based decision-making is necessary in order to optimize outcomes for patients with recurrent HCC.

Adjuvant Sorafenib Following Radiofrequency Ablation for Early-Stage Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Microvascular Invasion at the Initial Hepatectomy

Background

The efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for patients with early-stage recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with microvascular invasion (MVI) at the initial hepatectomy is limited. Our study aimed to explore whether adjuvant sorafenib following RFA could improve the situation.

Methods

We retrospectively included 211 patients with early-stage (tumor number of ≤3 and tumor size of 2–5 cm) recurrent HCC with MVI at the initial hepatectomy who underwent adjuvant sorafenib following RFA or RFA alone in 13 centers from June 2013 to June 2020. In the combination group, sorafenib of 400 mg twice daily was administered within 7 days after RFA. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared. Subgroup analysis based on MVI grade was performed. MVI grade was based on the practice guidelines for the pathological diagnosis of HCC and included M1 (≤5 MVI sites, all located within adjacent peritumoral liver tissues 0–1 cm away from the tumor margin) and M2 (>5 MVI sites, or any MVI site located within adjacent peritumoral liver tissues > 1 cm away from the tumor margin).

Results

A total of 103 patients received the combination therapy and 108 patients received RFA alone. The combination therapy provided better survival than RFA alone (median RFS: 17.7 vs. 13.1 months, P < 0.001; median OS: 32.0 vs. 25.0 months, P = 0.002). Multivariable analysis revealed that treatment allocation was an independent prognostic factor. On subgroup analysis, the combination therapy provided better survival than RFA alone in patients with M1 along with either a tumor size of 3–5 cm, tumor number of two to three, or alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) > 400 μg/L, and in those with M2 along with either a tumor size of 2–3 cm, one recurrent tumor, or AFP ≤ 400 μg/L.

Conclusions

Adjuvant sorafenib following RFA was associated with better survival than RFA alone in patients with early-stage recurrent HCC with MVI at the initial hepatectomy. Moreover, MVI grade could guide the application of adjuvant sorafenib.

Tumor feeding artery contraction and metastasis inhibition after transarterial chemoembolization combined with apatinib for hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching study

AIM

To investigate the change of tumor feeding artery diameter and the efficacy of metastasis inhibition after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with apatinib or TACE monotherapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who without metastasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 616 consecutive patients who received the treatment of TACE-apatinib or TACE in our center was enrolled. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to reduce bias. The overall survival (OS), OS-after-metastasis (OSM), time to progression (TTP), time to metastasis (TTM), time to vessel or organ metastasis (TVOM), time to lymph node metastasis, and tumor feeding artery diameter between the two treatment groups were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 113 pairs of patients were eligible after the PSM. Time to lymph node metastasis between the two groups was not significantly different (P > 0.05). The tumor feeding artery diameter was significantly smaller after TACE-apatinib management (P < 0.001). Median OS (P < 0.001) and OSM (P < 0.001) were significantly longer in the TACE-apatinib group compared with the TACE group. Median TTP (P < 0.001), TTM (P < 0.001), and TVOM (P < 0.001) were significantly prolonged in TACE-apatinib group.

CONCLUSION

TACE-apatinib treatment could improve the prognosis compared with TACE alone, and inhibit metastasis after TACE procedure with contracted tumor feeding artery for advanced HCCs without metastasis.

Comparison of the Efficacy Among Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE)-Radiofrequency Ablation Plus Apatinib, TACE Plus Apatinib, and TACE Alone for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of apatinib plus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

METHODS

From December 2015 to June 2018, 175 eligible participants were included in our research. Twenty-four patients who received apatinib plus TACE and RFA were categorized as the TACE + RFA-A group, 82 patients who received apatinib plus TACE were categorized as the TACE-A group, and 69 patients who received TACE alone were categorized as the TACE group. Treatment complications, treatment response, overall survival (OS), and time to progression (TTP) were recorded. Survival analyses were compared. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were conducted to investigate the predictive factors for OS and TTP. A subgroup analysis was carried out.

RESULTS

The median TTP was 8.0 months (95% CI 6.7-9.3) in the TACE + RFA-A, which was longer than the TACE-A group (6.0 months, 95% CI 4.8-7.2) and TACE group (3.0 months, 95% CI 2.3-3.7); the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The median OS was 23.0 months (95% CI 12.6-33.4) in the TACE + RFA-A group, 18.0 months (95% CI 16.2-19.8) in the TACE-A group, and 8.0 months (95% CI 5.3-10.7) in the TACE group; the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The objective response rate (ORR) was higher in TACE + RFA-A t group (M1, 70.8% vs 65.9% vs. 46.4%, P = 0.023; M3, 58.3% vs. 53.7% vs. 26.1%, P = 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis demonstrated that treatment strategy and tumor size were independent prognostic factors for the OS and TTP, whereas the Child-Pugh stage was predictive factor of OS. No treatment-related death was observed. The toxicity was comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

TACE combined with RFA plus apatinib is a safe three-modality treatment for the intermediate or advanced HCC, and it demonstrated better efficacy than TACE plus apatinib or TACE alone.

Clinical Outcome of CT-Guided Iodine-125 Radioactive Seed Implantation for Intrahepatic Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective, Multicenter Study

The efficacy and safety of CT-Guided Iodine-125 Radioactive Seed Implantation (RSI) for the treatment of intrahepatic recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) were analyzed in this multicenter retrospective study. We reviewed the medical records of patients with rHCC treated with I-125 seed implantation at four different hospitals in China from December 2011 and January 2021. The local progression-free survival (LPFS),liver PFS, and overall survival (OS) were calculated, and the short-term efficacy and treatment-related toxicities were evaluated. A total of 82 patients were enrolled; the median follow-up time was 46 months (range, 3–80 months). The 1-, 3- and 5-year LPFS rates were 63.8%, 27.1%, and 7.9%, respectively, and the corresponding OS rates were 74.8%, 32.9%, and 12.6%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that factors influencing LPFS included the maximum lesion diameter, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage, interval between treatment and recurrence, and D90. Multivariate analyses revealed that the BCLC stage, interval between treatment and recurrence, and D90 were independent factors influencing LPFS, whereas BCLC stage, D90, and short-term efficacy were independent factors influencing OS. In summary, I-125 seed implantation is a safe and effective treatment for rHCC. The BCLC stage, interval, and D90 were found to influence the local control. A larger, prospective study is required to confirm the dose-response curve for Iodine-125 RSI of rHCC.

EGFR/MET promotes hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis by stabilizing tumor cells and resisting to RTKs inhibitors in circulating tumor microemboli

The receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) family is well-recognized as vital targets for the treatment of hepatocarcinoma cancer (HCC) clinically, whereas the survival benefit of target therapy sorafenib is not satisfactory for liver cancer patients due to metastasis. EGFR and MET are two molecules of the RTK family that were related to the survival time of liver cancer patients and resistance to targeted therapy in clinical reports. However, the mechanism and clinical therapeutic value of EGFR/MET in HCC metastasis are still not completely clarified. The study confirmed that EGFR/MET was highly expressed in HCC cells and tissues and the phosphorylation was stable after metastasis. The expression of EGFR/MET was up-regulated in circulating tumor microemboli (CTM) to accelerate IL-8 production and resistance to the lethal effect of leukocytes. Meanwhile, highly expressed EGFR/MET effectively regulated the Ras/MAPK pathway and stabilized suspended HCC cells by facilitating proliferation and inhibiting apoptosis. Moreover, EGFR/MET promoted phosphorylation of hetero-RTKs, which was dependent on high-energy phosphoric acid compounds rather than their direct interactions. In conclusion, highly expressed EGFR/MET could be used in CTM identification and suitable for preventing metastasis of HCC in clinical practice.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus Treated With Transarterial Chemoembolization and Sorafenib vs. 125Iodine Implantation

Background and Aims

This study investigated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with CT-guided ¹²⁵iodine seed implantation for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with first-branch portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT).

Methods

This prospective, controlled, multicenter study included HCC patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C disease and PVTT in the right and/or left portal veins. Patients were treated with either TACE and sorafenib or TACE and CT-guided ¹²⁵iodine seed implantation and regularly evaluated for clinical response and adverse events, with treatment termination resulting from declining clinical status, loss to follow-up, or death.

Results

This study demonstrated a significant between-group difference in median overall survival (OS); therefore, it was terminated early. A total of 123 patients were included in this study, with 52 patients in the TACE-sorafenib group and 71 patients in the TACE-¹²⁵iodine group, without significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups. The median OS was 8.3 months (95% CI: 6.105–10.495) in the TACE-sorafenib group and 13.8 months (95% CI: 9.519–18.081) in the TACE-¹²⁵iodine group. In a subgroup analysis of type IIa versus type IIb PVTT, the median OS was 17.5 months for type IIa and 7.1 months for IIb in the TACE-¹²⁵iodine group. The median OS was 9.3 months for IIa and 4.0 months for IIb in the TACE-sorafenib group. Univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed that the PVTT type and treatment strategy were significant independent factors affecting OS. The objective response rates (ORR) for intrahepatic lesions and PVTT showed significant differences between groups. Most patients in both groups experienced minor adverse events related to TACE. The overall incidence of sorafenib-related adverse events or toxic effects was 90.4% in TACE-sorafenib group. In the TACE-¹²⁵iodine group, the incidence of pneumothorax and minor hepatic subcapsular hemorrhage were 7.04% and 9.86%, respectively.

Conclusions

This study showed that TACE-¹²⁵iodine treatment significantly enhanced survival of patients with HCC and type II PVTT, especially subtype IIa, with minimal adverse events.

Clinical Trial Registration

Chinese Clinical Trials Database, identifier ChiCTR-ONN-16007929.

TACE Plus Lenvatinib Versus TACE Plus Sorafenib for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background and Objectives

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus sorafenib (TACE-S) to TACE plus lenvatinib (TACE-L) for the treatment of HCC with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT).

Methods

This cohort study recruited patients from September 2017 to September 2020. A total of 59 and 57 consecutive patients were treated with TACE-L and TACE-S, respectively.

Results

Before propensity score matching (PSM), comparing TACE-L to TACE-S, the median overall survival (OS) time was 16.4 months and 12.7 months, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 1.34; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81-2.20; p = 0.25]. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 8.4 months and 7.43 months, respectively (HR 1.54; 95% CI: 0.98-2.41; p = 0.081). After PSM, the median OS time was 18.97 months and 10.77 months, respectively (HR 2.21; 95% CI: 1.12-4.38; p = 0.022); the median PFS time was 10.6 months (95% CI: 6.6-18.0 months) and 5.4 months (95% CI: 4.2-8.1 months), respectively (HR 2.62; 95% CI: 1.43-4.80; p = 0.002). After PSM, the overall response rate (ORR) was 66.8% vs. 33.3% [odds ratio (OR) 0.85; 1.05-6.90; p = 0.037].

Conclusion

Both TACE-L and TACE-S are safe, well-tolerated treatments for HCC with PVTT. In HCC with PVTT, TACE-L was significantly superior to TACE-S with respect to OS, PFS, and ORR. A larger-scale randomized clinical trial is needed.

Prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombus treated with combination of transarterial chemoembolization and palliative thermal ablation

PURPOSE

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) was obtained acceptable benefit for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Here in this study, we compared the benefit of TACE combined palliative thermal ablation with TACE alone for HCC with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT).

METHODS

Patients with HCC and PVTT were retrospectively analyzed from January 2012 to December 2017, who accepted treatment of TACE alone (TACE group) or TACE plus palliative thermal ablation (TACE + P-ablation group). Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance differences between the two groups. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 7.4 (3.0-60.0) months. In the cohort, 142 patients were enrolled in TACE group and 86 patients were enrolled in TACE + P-ablation group. The pre-PSM estimated 6-, 12-, and 18-month OS rates for the TACE + P-ablation group were 70.9, 46.5, and 31%, respectively, whereas rates for the TACE group were 57, 23.1, and 10%, respectively. After PSM, OS and PFS rates remained coincident with the pre-PSM. Risk factors for poor OS included PVTT type III and type II relative to type I (HR = 1.76; 95% CI, 1.13-2.74; p = .01) and (HR = 1.86; 95% CI, 1.2-2.88; p = .006), TACE alone (HR = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.01-1.96; p = .04), a single TACE treatment (HR = 2.69; 95% CI, 1.79-4.03; p < .001), 2 or 3 TACE treatments (HR = 2.02; 95% CI, 1.32-3.09; p = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of TACE and palliative thermal ablation for HCC with PVTT could obtain delayed progression and longer survival.

Transcatheter chemoembolization plus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation versus laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation: improved outcome for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma

AIMS

To retrospectively compare the efficacy of transcatheter chemoembolization (TACE) plus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) (hereafter, TACE + PRFA) and laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (LRFA) in the treatment of inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

From July 2014 to December 2017, 132 consecutive patients with inoperable HCC were treated with TACE + PRFA (n = 86) or LRFA (n = 46). Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed using log-rank test and Cox regression analysis. Propensity score matched (PSM) analyses based on patient and tumor characteristics were also conducted. Additionally, we performed exploratory analyses to determine the effectiveness of TACE + PRFA and LRFA in clinically relevant subsets.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of TACE + PRFA patients displayed relatively inferior liver status and a higher rate of BCLC-B disease. For unmatched patients, median OS (55.0 vs. 42.0 months; p = .019) and RFS (20.0 vs. 11.0 months; p < .001) were significantly longer in TACE + PRFA group than that in the LRFA group. After PSM, 39 matched pairs were identified. The difference in median OS (60.0 vs. 44.0 months; p = .009) and RFS (27.0 vs. 11.0 months; p < .001) between the two groups remained significant. Multivariate analysis in matched patients showed that treatment modality and response to initial treatment were significant predictors of OS and RFS, while recurrence after resection was an independent prognostic factor of OS. The benefits of TACE + PRFA were consistent across all the subgroups examined. The different treatments had shared a similar complication rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to LRFA, TACE + PRFA results in improved OS and RFS in patients not amenable to resection.

Analysis of factors affecting the prognosis of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic factors for transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Materials and methods

The variables that may affect overall survival (OS), such as age, gender, AFP, Child Pugh classification, body mass index, HBV-DNA, HbeAg, tumor number, tumor diameter, BCLC stage, embolization method, ablation therapy, and targeted therapy, were analyzed by single factor and many factor COX regression. In addition, predictive factors of OS were stratified and a Kaplan-Meier survival curve was drawn.

Results

Among the 136 patients, the median follow-up time was 14.5 months (range: 2-72 months). HCC patients with the tumor diameter <3 ​cm had the highest survival rate, followed by patients with a tumor diameter of 3-5 ​cm; the survival rate of patients with the tumor diameter (greater than 5 ​cm) was the lowest. Among the BCLC stages, stage A patients had the highest survival rate, followed by stage B and stage C patients, which had the lowest survival rate.The survival rate of Child Pugh grade A patients was higher than those with Child Pugh grade B. Compared with patients who did not undergo ablation treatment, the survival rate of patients with combined ablation treatment was relatively high. The survival rate of patients receiving drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) treatment was higher than those receiving conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) treatment. Additionally, repeated TACE treatment improved the OS rate of patients. These six factors were related to patient prognosis and the differences were statistically significant (P ​< ​0.05).

Conclusions

Tumor diameter, BCLC stage, TACE repetition, and TACE combined with ablation were independent prognostic factors of OS.

Advances in locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma combined with immunotherapy and targeted therapy

Locoregional therapies (LRTs) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represented by ablation and TACE has become the main means for the clinical treatment of unresectable HCC. Among these, TACE is used throughout the stage Ib to IIIb of HCC treatment. In recent years, immunotherapy led by immune checkpoint inhibitors has become a hot direction in clinical research. At the same time, targeted drugs such as Sorafenib and Apatinib have played an important role in the treatment and complementary therapy of advanced HCC, and their clinical application has been quite mature. HCC is the sixth most common malignant tumor in the world. When it comes to its treatment, different therapies have different indications, and their individual efficacies are not satisfactory, which makes the exploration of the use of combination therapy in HCC treatment become a new trend. In this paper, the status of the three therapies and the progress of their combined application are briefly reviewed.

Review of clinical tumor ablation advance in Asia

Tumor ablation has been widely applied in Asia, accounting for 44.65% of clinical studies worldwide. We reviewed 5853 clinical studies to provide insight on the advance of tumor ablation in Asia chronologically and geographically among different techniques and organs. Since 1998, tumor ablation application has dramatically evolved in Asia. All kinds of ablation techniques, including percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), laser ablation (LA), cryoablation (CA), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), and irreversible electroporation (IRE), have been applied, with the first application of PEI and the most popular application of RFA. Twenty-five countries and one district in Asia have applied tumor ablation in various organs, including liver, lung, uterus, thyroid, kidney, pancreas, bone, prostate, breast, adrenal gland, lymph node parathyroid, esophagus, etc. Due to the high incidence of tumors as well as advanced economy and technology, East Asia accounted for 93.87% of studies, led by China (45.00%), Japan (32.72%), South Korea (12.10%), and Taiwan (4.03%). With the enrichment of evidence from large-scale multicenter and randomized control studies, China and South Korea have issued several guidelines on tumor ablation for liver, lung, and thyroid, which provided recommendations for global standardization of tumor ablation techniques. Therefore, Asia has made active contribution to global tumor ablation therapy.KeypointsKey point 1: Asia accounted for 44.65% of clinical studies worldwide on tumor ablation.Key point 2: Twenty-five countries and one district in Asia have used tumor ablation in various organs, and East Asia accounted for 93.87% of studies, led by China (45.00%), Japan (32.72%), South Korea (12.10%), and Taiwan (4.03%).Key point 3: China and South Korea have issued several guidelines on tumor ablation for liver, lung, and thyroid, which provided recommendations for global standardization of tumor ablation techniques.

Comparison of Chemoembolization, Radioembolization, and Transarterial Ethanol Ablation for Huge Hepatocellular Carcinoma (≥ 10 cm) in Tumour Response and Long-Term Survival Outcome

PURPOSE

To compare transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial radioembolization using Yttrium-90 (TARE), and transarterial ethanol ablation (TEA) for huge hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in treatment responses and long-term survival outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study approved by institutional committee, inclusion criteria were tumour ≥ 10 cm, newly diagnosed, treatment naïve, Child A, Performance Score 0 or 1, no venous invasion or extrahepatic disease on contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. There were 107 patients (Supportive Care [SC] 17, TACE 54, TARE 17, TEA 19). Survival outcomes of SC and TACE were compared (TACE selected as benchmark for transarterial treatments). Tumour response and overall survival (OS) of the three groups were compared.

RESULTS

OS of TACE (vs. SC) was significantly longer (9.9 [5.9, 24.1] months versus 2.8 [1.5, 10.2], p = 0.001). Complete response of TEA was significantly better (TEA 10/19 [52.6%] versus TARE 2/17 [12.5%], p = 0.013, versus TACE 9/54 [16.7%], p = 0.002). OS of TEA (vs. TACE) was significantly longer (21.6 [12, 41] months versus 9.9 [5.9, 24.1], p = 0.014, hazard ratio 0.6 (0.3, 1). OS of TEA (vs. TARE) was longer (21.6 [12, 41] months versus 11.9 [7, 28.7], p = 0.082, hazard ratio 0.6 (0.3, 1.3) in favour of TEA).

CONCLUSION

In patients with huge HCC, transarterial treatment as represented by TACE had a survival benefit over supportive care. In this retrospective analysis, TEA was associated with better tumour response and survival outcome as compared to TACE or TARE; therefore, transarterial treatment could be useful for prolonging patient survival, and TEA could be a preferred option.

Emerging Trends in the Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Radiological Perspective

This is a narrative review of various treatment modalities for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with a focus on recent updates in radiological treatments, as well as novel treatment concepts related to immune checkpoint inhibitors and combination therapies with locoregional treatments. Interventional radiologists have made efforts toward developing alternative and/or combination treatments for first-line systemic treatment of patients with advanced HCC. Locoregional treatments with or without systemic therapy may be considered in the selected patients. Various treatment modalities for advanced HCC are emerging, and several randomized controlled trials, including those of combination treatments with immunotherapy, are ongoing.

Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: Prognostic factors and recent advances

With the improvement of technology and diagnostic level, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has made rapid progress in the treatment of primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the past two decades. Especially, the overall survival after the treatment of small HCCs by RFA can be comparable to that achieved by hepatic resection. The 10-year survival rates of RFA for HCC were 27.3%-46.1%, and for solitary HCC less than 3 cm, the 10-year survival rate is about 74.0%. RFA combined with other therapies can expand the indications of RFA treatment and benefit the survival of patients with HCC. The prognostic model of RFA for HCC provides a powerful tool for individualized clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Transarterial chemoembolization plus lenvatinib versus transarterial chemoembolization plus sorafenib as first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: A prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus lenvatinib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) have not been evaluated.

METHODS

In this open-label, single-center, randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04127396), participants with previously untreated HCC and type I-IV PVTT were randomized 1:1 to receive TACE plus lenvatinib (arm L; orally once daily, 12 mg for body weight ≥60 kg or 8 mg for body weight <60 kg) or TACE plus sorafenib (arm S; 400 mg orally twice daily in 28-day cycles). The primary end point was time-to-progression (TTP; time from randomization to disease progression) and secondary end points included objective response rate and toxicity. Prognostic factors were evaluated using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Between December 30, 2018 and May 31, 2020, 64 patients were randomized (arm L, n = 32; arm S, n = 32); most patients had type I/II PVTT (71.9%), and the median target tumor diameter was 9.8 cm (range, 3.8-21.8). After a median follow-up of 16.1 months, patients in arm L had a higher median TTP (4.7 vs 3.1 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.95; P = .029) and objective response rate (53.1% vs 25.0%, P = .039) versus arm S. Multivariable analysis showed that TACE plus lenvatinib was significantly associated with higher TTP versus TACE plus sorafenib (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28-0.90; P = .021). Comparable safety profiles were observed in arms L and S.

CONCLUSIONS

TACE plus lenvatinib was safe, well tolerated, and had favorable efficacy versus TACE plus sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC with PVTT and large tumor burden.

LAY SUMMARY

Hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus has a poor prognosis. In addition, most phase 3 trials of drugs for hepatocellular carcinoma exclude patients with major portal vein invasion, and treatment options for these patients are limited. Transarterial chemoembolization has shown promising efficacy in these patients, especially in combination with systemic treatment or radiotherapy. However, transarterial chemoembolization plus lenvatinib has not been investigated in this setting. This open-label, single-center, randomized trial showed that transarterial chemoembolization plus lenvatinib is safe, well tolerated, and has favorable efficacy versus transarterial chemoembolization plus sorafenib for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus.

Exosomal microRNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths. The prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients is extremely poor due to the occult onset and high metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Therefore, biomarkers with high specificity and sensitivity are of great importance in early screening, diagnosis prognosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Exosomes are tiny vesicles secreted by various types of cells, which can serve as mediators of intercellular communication to regulate the tumor microenvironment, and play a key role in the occurrence, development, prognosis, monitor and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. As microRNA deliverer, exosomes are involved in multiple life activities by regulating target genes of recipient cells such as proliferation, invasion, metastasis and apoptosis of cancer cells. In this review, we summarized the composition, active mechanism and function of exosomal microRNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma, and elaborated on their potential application value of early diagnosis and treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Radiologic Response Combined with Dermatologic Toxicities is the Most Robust Predictor of Survival Benefits in Patients with Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Sorafenib Therapy

PURPOSE

The survival benefits of patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who undergo transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and receive sorafenib therapy remain controversial. We aimed to identify clinical predictors in patients with inoperable HCC undergoing TACE and receiving sorafenib.

METHODS

Between January 2014 and December 2017, 148 consecutive patients with inoperable HCC who were treated with TACE plus sorafenib were retrospectively analyzed. Critical clinical factors associated with overall survival (OS) were identified by Cox regression model analysis. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to calculate the survival times, which were compared with the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Macrovascular invasion (MVI), radiologic response and sorafenib-related dermatologic toxicities were identified as independent factors associated with OS. MVI is a known prognostic factor before treatment. The median OS of patients with either radiologic response or dermatologic toxicities was significantly improved compared with that of patients without it (both 23.0 vs. 7.0 months, P < 0.001). The median OS of patients with a combination of radiologic response and dermatologic toxicities was significantly longer than that of patients with either radiologic response or dermatologic toxicities, as well as no response (25.0 vs. 14.0 vs. 6.0 months, respectively, P < 0.001), and the predictive value was confirmed across patients with different baseline characteristics in terms of MVI, α-fetoprotein level, performance status and liver function.

CONCLUSION

The combination of radiologic response and sorafenib-related dermatologic toxicities is the most robust predictor of survival benefits for HCC patients after TACE plus sorafenib therapy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

A prognostic score model for predicting the survival benefits of patients undergoing sorafenib plus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion

PURPOSE

The survival benefits and which patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) would benefit from sorafenib plus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) therapy remain controversial. We aimed to develop a prognostic score model for predicting different prognoses of patients with HCC and portal vein invasion who received sorafenib plus TACE.

METHODS

This observational study included 167 patients with HCC and portal vein invasion undergoing sorafenib combined with TACE from January 2013 to June 2018 at two hospitals. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed using a training cohort (n = 83) to identify critical factors associated with survival. Then, a prognostic score model was established to classify different outcomes and confirmed using a validation cohort (n = 84).

RESULTS

Three factors were determined to critically impact survival in the training cohort: portal vein invasion extent, sorafenib-related dermatologic response, and initial radiological response. Using the β-coefficients of these factors, a prognostic score was calculated, and the survival time decreased as the score increased. Based on the prognostic score model, three different prognoses of patients with 0 points, 2-3 points, and > 3 points were stratified with a median survival of 38.0 months, 20.0 months, and 7.0 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Time to progression was also significantly different using the same prognostic index. The prognostic score model was confirmed by the validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

Sorafenib plus TACE is a potential therapy for selected HCC patients with portal vein invasion. This prognostic score model can predict the survival benefits for these patients.

Intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: an update

Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence occurs in 40-70% of patients after hepatic resection. Despite the high frequency of hepatocellular cancer relapse, there is no established guidance for the management of such cases. The evaluation of prognostic factors that indicate a high risk of recurrence after surgery such as the tumor number and size and the presence of microvascular invasion may guide the therapeutic strategy and point out which patients should be strictly monitored. Additionally, the administration of adjuvant treatment or ab initio liver transplantation in selected patients with high-risk characteristics could have a significant impact on the prevention of relapse and overall survival. Once the recurrence has occurred in the liver remnant, the available therapeutic options include re-resection, salvage liver transplantation and locoregional treatments, although the therapeutic choice is often challenging and should be based on the characteristics of the recurrent tumor, the patient profile and most importantly the timing of relapse. Aggressive combination treatments are often required in challenging cases of early relapse. The results of the above treatment strategies are reviewed and compared to determine the optimal management of patients with recurrent hepatocellular cancer following liver resection.

Unusual paired hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in the biliary system after liver resection and endoscopic sphincterotomy

Highlight Kagoura and colleagues report a rare case of paired hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after hepatectomy with removal of a bile duct tumor thrombosis following endoscopic sphincterotomy. Recurrence is believed to have occurred both at the stump of the hepatic bile duct and at the post-sphincterotomy site of the papilla of Vater.

Efficacy and Safety of TACE Combined With Sorafenib Plus Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for the Treatment of Intermediate and Advanced TACE-Refractory Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study

Purpose: The study aims to retrospectively investigate the efficacy and safety of sorafenib combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) (TACE+Sor) vs. TACE combined with sorafenib plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (TACE+Sor+ICIs) in treating intermediate and advanced TACE-refractory hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and Methods: This study was approved by the ethics committee of Lisui Hospital, Zhejiang University, China. From January 2016 to June 2020, 51 eligible patients with intermediate or advanced TACE-refractory HCC received TACE+Sor (n = 29) or TACE+Sor+ICIs (n = 22). The differences in tumor response, adverse events (AEs), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. Factors affecting PFS and OS were determined by Cox regression. Results: The disease control rate was higher in the TACE+Sor+ICIs group than in the TACE+Sor group (81.82 vs. 55.17%, P = 0.046). Compared with the TACE+Sor group, PFS and OS were prolonged in the TACE+Sor+ICIs group (median PFS: 16.26 vs. 7.30 months, P < 0.001; median OS: 23.3 vs. 13.8 months, P = 0.012). Multivariate analysis showed that BCLC stage, alpha-fetoprotein and treatment were independent factors of PFS; BCLC, Child-Pugh class, ablation after disease progression and treatment were independent predictive factors of OS. Four patients in the TACE+Sor+ICIs group and three patients in the TACE+Sor group suffered from dose reduction or interruption (18.18 vs. 10.34%, P = 0.421). The incidence of ICI-related AEs in the TACE+Sor+ICIs group was well-controlled. Conclusion: The therapeutic schedule of TACE+Sor+ICIs demonstrated efficacy and safety in intermediate and advanced TACE-refractory HCC.

Efficacy and Safety of TACE Combined With Sorafenib Plus Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for the Treatment of Intermediate and Advanced TACE-Refractory Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study

Purpose: The study aims to retrospectively investigate the efficacy and safety of sorafenib combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) (TACE+Sor) vs. TACE combined with sorafenib plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (TACE+Sor+ICIs) in treating intermediate and advanced TACE-refractory hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Materials and Methods: This study was approved by the ethics committee of Lisui Hospital, Zhejiang University, China. From January 2016 to June 2020, 51 eligible patients with intermediate or advanced TACE-refractory HCC received TACE+Sor (n = 29) or TACE+Sor+ICIs (n = 22). The differences in tumor response, adverse events (AEs), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. Factors affecting PFS and OS were determined by Cox regression.

Results: The disease control rate was higher in the TACE+Sor+ICIs group than in the TACE+Sor group (81.82 vs. 55.17%, P = 0.046). Compared with the TACE+Sor group, PFS and OS were prolonged in the TACE+Sor+ICIs group (median PFS: 16.26 vs. 7.30 months, P < 0.001; median OS: 23.3 vs. 13.8 months, P = 0.012). Multivariate analysis showed that BCLC stage, alpha-fetoprotein and treatment were independent factors of PFS; BCLC, Child-Pugh class, ablation after disease progression and treatment were independent predictive factors of OS. Four patients in the TACE+Sor+ICIs group and three patients in the TACE+Sor group suffered from dose reduction or interruption (18.18 vs. 10.34%, P = 0.421). The incidence of ICI-related AEs in the TACE+Sor+ICIs group was well-controlled.

Conclusion: The therapeutic schedule of TACE+Sor+ICIs demonstrated efficacy and safety in intermediate and advanced TACE-refractory HCC.

Virtual navigation-guided radiofrequency ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma invisible on ultrasound after hepatic resection

BACKGROUND

No reports are available on the technical efficiency and therapeutic response of virtual navigation (VN)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatic resection. The aim of this study was to investigate the overall technical performance and outcome of VN-guided RFA in recurrent HCC patients. In addition, a nomogram model was developed to predict the factors influencing the overall survival (OS).

METHODS

This was a prospective study on 76 recurrent HCC patients who underwent VN-guided RFA between June 2015 and February 2018. The technical feasibility, success, and efficiency, OS, local tumor progression, and complications were evaluated. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was conducted to predict the significant factors, and a nomogram including independent predictive factors was subsequently plotted to predict OS.

RESULTS

The technical feasibility, success, and efficiency rates of VN-guided RFA were 86.4%, 94.7%, and 97.4%, respectively. The cumulative OS rates at 1-, 2-, and 3-year were 88.1%, 79.7%, and 71.0%, respectively. The cumulative local tumor progression rates at 1-, 2-, and 3-year were 5.5%, 8.7%, and 14.0%, respectively. In addition, the minor and major complication rates were 5.3% and 3.9%, respectively. No intervention-related deaths occurred during the follow-up period. The C-index of the OS nomogram in this study was 0.737.

CONCLUSIONS

VN-guided RFA is an effective therapeutic option in recurrent HCC patients and improves the long-term outcomes especially for the lesions that cannot be detected in the two-dimensional ultrasound. Besides, the nomogram may be a useful supporting tool in predicting OS to estimate the individual survival probability, optimize treatment options, and facilitate decision-making.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Based on 99mTc-GSA SPECT Image-guided Inverse Planning for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIM

A recent planning study suggested that ^99mTc-labelled diethylene triamine pentaacetate-galactosyl human serum albumin (^99mTc-GSA) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) image-guided inverse planning (IGIP) shows dosimetric superiority to conventional planning in sparing liver function. Here, we report the first clinical translation of ^99mTc-GSA SPECT IGIP for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

CASE REPORT

A 60-year-old male developed obstructive jaundice caused by recurrent HCC in segment 1 after hepatic resection. He underwent repeated radiotherapy (RT) consisting of 45 Gy in 15 fractions 8 years ago and 30 Gy in 5 fractions 2 years ago. We performed SBRT consisting of 40 Gy in 8 fractions using ^99mTc-GSA SPECT-IGIP. We confirmed the dosimetric superiority of functional IGIP to conventional planning. He achieved complete response as assessed using the target volume. The patient has remained alive without recurrence for 18 months. He did not experience radiation-induced liver disease.

CONCLUSION

Recurrent HCC was successfully and safely salvaged via re-irradiation with SBRT using ^99mTc-GSA SPECT-IGIP.

Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation Combined With Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Sorafenib for Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma Invading the Portal Venous System: A Prospective Randomized Study

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) portends a worse prognosis. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus sorafenib to that of the most commonly utilized regimen of TACE plus sorafenib in large HCCs with type I/II PVTT.

Methods

An open-label, single-center, prospective, randomized trial of participants with tumors ≥5 cm and type I/II PVTT was performed. Participants with previously untreated HCCs were divided into two groups: RFA + cTACE + sorafenib (study group, n = 40) and cTACE + sorafenib (control group, n = 40). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR), the secondary endpoints included the overall survival (OS); time to progression (TTP); and toxicity. Prognostic factors were analyzed using cox-regression analysis.

Results

80 patients were enrolled into this study with integrated clinical data. Under a median follow-up of 506 days, the median age was 57.5 years (range: 28–80 years). The ORR of study group was higher than control group (70% vs 22.5%, p<0.001). Furthermore, the median OS of study group was superior to that of control group (468 days vs 219 days, HR: 0.44 [95% CI: 0.25–0.78], P = 0.005). Adverse events occurred with 100% probability in both groups (p>0.99), but no treatment-related deaths were recorded. Tumor encapsulation and attaining treatment response predict favorable OS in a multivariate Cox model. The rates of adverse events in both groups were 100% (p>0.99). There were no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusions

RFA combined with TACE plus sorafenib is a safe, well-tolerated three-modality treatment for large HCCs with types I/II PVTT, and it demonstrated better efficacy than TACE plus sorafenib alone.

CKD-5, a novel pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor, synergistically enhances the efficacy of sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACIs) have distinctive epigenetic targets involved in hepatocarcinogenesis and chemoresistance. A recent phase I/II study reported the possibility of HDACI as a chemosensitizer in sorafenib-resistant patients. In this study, we evaluated whether CKD-5, a novel pan-HDACI, can potentiate the efficacy of sorafenib.

METHODS

The anticancer effect of CKD-5 with and without sorafenib was evaluated in vitro using an MTS assay with human HCC cells (SNU-3058 and SNU-761) under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Microarray analysis was performed to investigate the mechanism of cell death, which was also evaluated by small interfering RNA (siRNA) transfection and subsequent immunoblot assays. In vivo experiments were conducted using two different murine HCC models. C3H mice implanted with MH134 cells and C57BL/6 mice implanted with RIL-175 cells were treated with weekly CKD-5 with and without sorafenib for 2 weeks.

RESULTS

CKD-5 treatment significantly suppressed human HCC cell growth in both normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Microarray analysis and real-time PCR showed that CKD-5 treatment significantly increased peripherin expression in HCC cells and that downregulation of peripherin by siRNA decreased CKD-5-induced apoptosis. The combination of CKD-5 and sorafenib decreased cell viability more effectively than sorafenib or CKD-5 monotherapy in human and murine HCC cells. The effectiveness of the combination therapy was consistently demonstrated in the animal models. Histological and biochemical analyses demonstrated good tolerance of CKD-5 plus sorafenib in vivo.

CONCLUSION

CKD-5 may enhance sorafenib efficacy through epigenetic regulation. The combination of CKD-5 and sorafenib might be a novel therapeutic option for the treatment of HCC.

Safety and Local Efficacy of Laser Ablation for the Extrahepatic Metastasis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Available Treatment Strategy

Thermal ablation plays an important role in the treatment of extrahepatic metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Yet laser ablation (LA), as a safe thermal ablative modality, is less investigated in this field. In this study, the safety and local effectiveness of LA in the treatment for the extrahepatic metastasis of HCC were evaluated. From May 2012 to May 2019, 17 patients (13 males and 4 females; mean age, 54.1 ± 14.6 years; age range, 34–80 years), who underwent LA for treatment of extrahepatic metastasis of HCC at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Local effectiveness, complications, local tumor progression (LTP), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Finally, a total of 28 LA treated extrahepatic metastatic lesions of HCC were reviewed. Neither LA-related mortality nor major complication occurred. Complete ablation (CA) was achieved in 20 out of 28 lesions (71.4%). During the follow-up (mean, 19.5 ± 12.8 months; range, 5–42.7 months), LTP developed in 4 out of 20 lesions with CA (20%). Four patients died of tumor progression or multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. The accumulative one- and three-year OS rates were 79.0% and 65.8%, respectively. In conclusion, LA is a safe and effective therapeutic option in the treatment of extrahepatic metastasis of HCC. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the benefit of LA.

The combination therapy of transarterial chemoembolisation and sorafenib is the preferred palliative treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a meta-analysis

Background

To compare the efficacy of three types of palliative therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) monotherapy, sorafenib alone and their combination.

Methods

The databases of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were retrieved. The odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to investigate the binary variables, and the standardised mean difference (SMD) with its 95% CI was employed to evaluate the continuous variables. All statistical tests were performed by using Stata/SE, version 12.0.

Results

Thirty-one clinical studies, containing 5125 unique cases of patients with advanced HCC, were included. There were significant improvements in overall survival (OS) (pooled SMD = 2.54; 95% CI 1.74–3.34) and time to progression (TTP) (pooled SMD = 2.49; 95% CI 0.87–4.12) of the patients after receiving the combination therapy of TACE and sorafenib, compared to TACE monotherapy, and the OS in the combined treatment cohort was also longer than that in the sorafenib-alone cohort (pooled SMD = 2.92; 95% CI 1.72–4.13). The combination therapy group in comparison to the TACE group benefited a significantly increased overall response rate (ORR) (pooled OR = 2.61; 95% CI 1.43–4.77), 1-year (pooled OR = 2.96; 95% CI 1.71–5.14) and 2-year (pooled OR = 1.64; 95% CI 1.18–2.28) survival rates and reduced disease progression rate (DPR) (pooled OR = 0.47; 95% CI 0.33–0.68); in parallel, the ORR in the group was also significantly higher than that in the sorafenib-alone group (pooled OR = 3.62; 95% CI 1.28–10.22), although without a difference in the DPR (pooled OR = 0.28; 95% CI 0.05–1.48). In addition, we discovered that the 1-year (pooled OR = 1.39; 95% CI 0.84–2.29) and 2-year (pooled OR = 1.70; 95% CI 0.69–4.18) survival rates in the TACE monotherapy cohort were not significantly different to those in the sorafenib-alone cohort.

Conclusion

The combination therapy is more effective than monotherapy in improving the prognostic outcomes of patients with advanced HCC. Therefore, we recommend it as the preferred treatment intervention for those patients.

Add-on sorafenib is beneficial for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with transarterial chemoembolization refractoriness: a real-world experience

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Sorafenib is the first proved target therapy that shows significant survival benefit in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. This study was aimed to investigate whether add-on sorafenib be beneficial for those experienced transarterial chemoembolization refractoriness.

METHODS

From 2005 to 2016, a total of 656 treatment-naive hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization treatment were recruited. Transarterial chemoembolization refractoriness was defined as progressive disease after two consecutive of transarterial chemoembolization treatment within 6 months. Patient's baseline characteristics, tumor burden, and parameters for liver function evaluation during treatment were analyzed. All the variables were compared between patients with and without transarterial chemoembolization refractoriness, as well as with and without add-on sorafenib.

RESULTS

Among the 656 patients, the median age was 62.5 (range 27.3-91.5) years old, and 74.5% were male. Transarterial chemoembolization refractoriness events were documented in 202 patients (30.8%). After multivariate logistic regression analysis, tumor size ≧5 cm, baseline alpha-fetoprotein level ≧200 mg/dl, elevation of alpha-fetoprotein ≧20%, and elevation of Child-Turcotte-Pugh score ≧2 points after first transarterial chemoembolization were the independent predictive factors for transarterial chemoembolization refractoriness. Twenty-two patients (10.9%) received add-on sorafenib treatment and 146 (72.3%) patients continued transarterial chemoembolization treatment alone. After 1:2 propensity score matching, patients with add-on sorafenib therapy had significantly longer median overall survival than transarterial chemoembolization treatment alone (23.1 vs. 11.0 months, log-rank P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The tumor size, baseline alpha-fetoprotein, and elevation of alpha-fetoprotein and Child-Turcotte-Pugh score after first transarterial chemoembolization were the predictors for transarterial chemoembolization refractoriness. For patients with transarterial chemoembolization refractoriness, add-on sorafenib achieved better survival benefit than transarterial chemoembolization treatment alone.