Diagnostic accuracy of tongue coating in identifying acute appendicitis: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Acute appendicitis requires timely diagnosis. The diagnostic efficacy of tongue examination in making this diagnosis has not been established. This study investigates whether the Tongue Coating Index (TCI), a validated measure of tongue coating, can aid in diagnosing acute appendicitis.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study (1 September 2018-31 December 2020) at a single Japanese hospital. Adults (≥20 years) with suspected acute appendicitis, presenting to either the emergency department or general outpatient clinic, were enrolled. Tongue images were taken at presentation; two independent examiners-unrelated to clinical care and blinded to patient data-later scored these images using the TCI. A composite reference standard (clinical findings, imaging, histopathology, follow-up) was used to confirm appendicitis. We compared the TCI's diagnostic performance with the Alvarado score and its components using C-index, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

Of 145 included patients, 69 (47.6%) were diagnosed with acute appendicitis. The TCI demonstrated comparable discriminative ability (C-index AUC 0.62; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.71) to that of the Alvarado score (0.66; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.75). Of Alvarado score components, migration of pain had an AUC of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.55 to 0.71), anorexia 0.58 (95% CI, 0.50 to 0.66) and tenderness in the right lower quadrant 0.55 (95% CI, 0.50 to 0.60). At a cut-off of 3, the TCI demonstrated high sensitivity of 96% (95% CI, 88% to 98%) but low specificity of 21% (95% CI, 13% to 32%). Conversely, at a cut-off of 10, the TCI showed increased specificity of 83% (95% CI, 73% to 90%) but reduced sensitivity of 29% (95% CI, 20% to 41%).

CONCLUSION

The TCI showed comparable diagnostic performance to the Alvarado score and its individual components. TCI may potentially serve as an additional non-invasive indicator for diagnosing or ruling out acute appendicitis. Further research is essential to validate its clinical utility.

Current management of acute appendicitis in adults: What you need to know

ABSTRACT

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common acute surgical diseases in the world today. Acute appendicitis can present with a well-recognized clinical presentation with abdominal pain which localize in the right lower quadrant. This presentation is more typical in men than in women of child baring age. Several clinical and laboratory calculations can be used to increase the likelihood of making a correct diagnosis. Various imaging modalities can be used to make the diagnosis which include ultrasound, computer tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Each study has well known sensitivity/specificity of positive predictive value of making the diagnosis of appendicitis. The management of acute appendicitis is based on the presentation of the patient and dividing it into uncomplicated and complicated disease. Each requires management with antibiotics and followed with timely appendectomy. Recent studies have demonstrated nonoperative management of uncomplicated appendicitis without no fecalith that can be managed with antibiotics alone. Complicated acute appendicitis should undergo timely surgical intervention. Patients presenting with a large appendiceal abscess or phlegmon should undergo percutaneous drainage and antibiotic management. There are certain patient populations that should be considered for surgical intervention. Pregnant patients as well as immunosuppressed patients should undergo timely surgical intervention to decrease the risk of complications. This review outlines the current principles of the diagnosis, imaging, and treatment of acute appendicitis based on the best available evidence of acute appendicitis in adults.

2024 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: Diagnostic Imaging of Suspected Acute Appendicitis in Adults, Children, and Pregnant People

This paper is part of a clinical practice guideline update on the risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). In this paper, the panel provides recommendations for diagnostic imaging of suspected acute appendicitis. The panel's recommendations are based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.

Understanding Provider Cost of MRI for Appendicitis in Children: A Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To use time driven activity-based costing to characterize the provider cost of rapid MRI for appendicitis compared to other MRI examinations billed with the same Current Procedural Terminology codes commonly used for MRI appendicitis examinations.

METHODS

Rapid MRI appendicitis examination was compared with MRI pelvis without intravenous contrast, MRI abdomen/pelvis without intravenous contrast, and MRI abdomen/pelvis with intravenous contrast. Process maps for each examination were created through direct shadowing of patient procedures (n = 20) and feedback from relevant health care professionals. Additional data were collected from the electronic medical record for 327 MRI examinations. Practical capacity cost rates were calculated for personnel, equipment, and facilities. The cost of each step was calculated by multiplying the capacity cost rate with the mean duration of each step. Stepwise costs were summed to generate a total cost for each MRI examination.

RESULTS

The mean duration and costs for MRI examination type were as follows: MRI appendicitis: 11 (range: 6-25) min, $20.03 (7.80-44.24); MRI pelvis without intravenous contrast: 55 (29-205) min, $105.99 (64.18-285.13); MRI abdomen/pelvis without intravenous contrast: 65 (26-173) min, $144.83 (61.16-196.50); MRI abdomen/pelvis with intravenous contrast: 128 (39-303) min, $236.99 (102.62-556.54).

CONCLUSION

The estimated cost of providing a rapid appendicitis MRI examination is significantly less than other MRI examinations billed using Current Procedural Terminology codes typically used for appendicitis MRI. Mechanisms to appropriately bill rapid MRI examinations with limited sequences are needed to improve cost efficiency for the patient and to enable wider use of limited MRI examinations in the pediatric population.

Cognitive performance and magnetic resonance imaging in people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several studies have shown the different relationships between cognitive functions and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). However, there is an ongoing debate regarding the magnitude of correlation between MRI measurements and specific cognitive function tests. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize the most consistent correlations between MRI measurements and cognitive function in pwMS.

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched up to February 2023, to find relevant data. The search utilized syntax and medical subject headings (MeSH) relevant to cognitive performance tests and MRI measurements in pwMS. The R software version 4.3.3 with random effect models was used to estimate the pooled effect sizes.

RESULTS

13,559 studies were reviewed, of which 136 were included. The meta-analyses showed that thalamic volume had the most significant correlations with Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) r = 0.47 (95 % CI: 0.39 to 0.56, p < 0.001, I2 = 88 %), Brief Visual Memory Test-Revised-Total Recall (BVMT-TR) r = 0.51 (95 % CI: 0.36 to 0.66, p < 0.001, I2 = 81 %), California Verbal Learning Test-II-Total Recall (CVLT-TR) r = 0.47 (95 % CI: 0.34 to 0.59, p < 0.001, I2 = 69 %,), and Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) r = 0.48 (95 % CI: 0.34 to 0.63, p < 0.001, I2 = 22 %,).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that thalamic volume exhibits highest relationships with information processing speed (IPS), visuospatial learning-memory, verbal learning-memory, and executive function in pwMS. A comprehensive understanding of the intricacies of the mechanisms underpinning this association requires additional research.

Is appendoscope a new option for the treatment of acute appendicitis?

Acute appendicitis is a common surgical emergency. It is commonly caused by obstruction of the appendiceal lumen due to fecaliths, tumors, or lymphoid hyperplasia. For over a century, appendectomy has been the primary treatment for acute appendicitis. Abraham Groves performed the first open appendectomy in 1883. In 1983, Kurt Semm completed the first laparoscopic appendectomy, heralding a new era in appendectomy. However, appendectomy is associated with certain complications and a rate of negative appendectomies. Studies have suggested controversy over the impact of appendectomy on the development of inflammatory bowel disease and Parkinson's disease, but an increasing number of studies indicate a possible positive correlation between appendectomy and colorectal cancer, gallstones, and cardiovascular disease. With the recognition that the appendix is not a vestigial organ and the advancement of endoscopic te-chnology, Liu proposed the endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy. It is an effective minimally invasive alternative for treating uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Our team has developed an appendoscope with a disposable digital imaging system operated through the biopsy channel of a colonoscope and successfully applied it in the treatment of appendicitis. This article provides an overview of the progress in endoscopic treatment for acute appendicitis and offers a new perspective on the future direction of appendiceal disease treatment.

Introducing the ratio of cross diameters of the appendix for ultrasound diagnosis of acute appendicitis can significantly increase specificity

PURPOSE

To validate whether the introduction of the ratio of the cross diameters on the transverse section of the appendix (RATIO) ≤ 1.18 is useful for improving the ultrasound diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA).

METHODS

Data from 220 patients with AA and 110 patients with a normal appendix were retrospectively studied. The RATIO ≤ 1.18, maximal outer diameter (MOD) > 6 mm, and a combination of RATIO ≤ 1.18 and MOD > 6 mm were used for predicting AA. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were calculated.

RESULTS

The RATIO ≤ 1.18, MOD > 6 mm, and a combination of RATIO ≤ 1.18 and MOD > 6 mm for predicting AA showed a sensitivity of 90, 100, and 90%; specificity of 79.1, 27.3, and 88.2%; and AUC of 0.845, 0.636, and 0.891, respectively. When comparing the outcomes between MOD > 6 mm and a combination of MOD > 6 mm and RATIO ≤ 1.18, the specificity and PPV increased from 27.3 to 88.2% and 73.3 to 93.8%, respectively (all P < 0.0001). The sensitivity and NPV decreased from 100 to 90% and 100 to 81.5%, respectively (all P < 0.0001). The AUC increased from 0.636 to 0.891 (P < 0.0001). When comparing the AUC of MOD > 6 mm, and a combination of RATIO ≤ 1.18 and MOD > 6 mm for predicting AA with the AUC in a previous study, there were no significant differences between each other (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Introducing the RATIO ≤ 1.18 for the evaluation of AA can improve the diagnostic performance and significantly increase specificity.

Observation Safely Reduces the Use of the Computerized Tomography in Medium-to-Low-Risk Patients with Suspected Acute Appendicitis: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Objectives-The objective was to compare the effectiveness of observation in standard-of-care computed tomography (CT) in adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis (AA). Methods-Patients with clinically suspected AA and inconclusive diagnosis after primary clinical examination, laboratory examination, and transabdominal ultrasound (TUS) were eligible for the study, and they were randomized (1:1) to parallel groups: observation-group patients were observed for 8-12 h and then, repeated clinical and laboratory examinations and TUS were performed; CT group (control group) patients underwent abdominopelvic CT scan. The study utilized Statistical Analysis System 9.2 for data analysis, including tests, logistic regression, ROC analysis, and significance evaluation. Patients were enrolled in the study at Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos in Lithuania between December 2018 and June 2021. Results-A total of 160 patients (59 men, 101 women), with a mean age of 33.7 ± 14.71, were included, with 80 patients in each group. Observation resulted in a reduced likelihood of a CT scan compared with the CT group (36.3% vs. 100% p < 0.05). One diagnostic laparoscopy was performed in the observation group; there were no cases of negative appendectomy (NA) in the CT group. Both conditional CT and observation pathways resulted in high sensitivity and specificity (97.7% and 94.6% vs. 96.7% and 95.8%). Conclusions-Observation including the repeated evaluation of laboratory results and TUS significantly reduces the number of CT scans without increasing NA numbers or the number of complicated cases.

Added value of ratio of cross diameters of the appendix in ultrasound diagnosis of acute appendicitis

BACKGROUND

The maximum outer diameter (MOD) of the appendix is an essential parameter for diagnosing acute appendicitis, but there is space for improvement in ultrasound (US) diagnostic performance.

AIM

To investigate whether combining the ratio of the cross diameters (RATIO) of the appendix with MOD of the appendix can enhance the diagnostic performance of acute appendicitis.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted, and medical records of 233 patients with acute appendicitis and 112 patients with a normal appendix were reviewed. The MOD and RATIO of the appendix were calculated and tested for their diagnostic performance of acute appendicitis, both individually and in combination.

RESULTS

The RATIO for a normal appendix was 1.32 ± 0.16, while for acute appendicitis it was 1.09 ± 0.07. The cut-off value for RATIO was determined to be ≤ 1.18. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for diagnosing acute appendicitis using RATIO ≤ 1.18 and MOD > 6 mm was 0.870 and 0.652, respectively. There was a significant difference in AUC between RATIO ≤ 1.18 and MOD > 6 mm (P < 0.0001). When comparing the combination of RATIO ≤ 1.18 and MOD > 6 mm with MOD > 6 mm alone, the combination showed increased specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and AUC. However, the sensitivity and negative predictive value decreased.

CONCLUSION

Combining RATIO of the appendix ≤ 1.18 and MOD > 6 mm can significantly improve the specificity, PPV, and AUC in the US diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

[Acute appendicitis in adults]

Acute appendicitis in adults. Clinical guidelines.

Pediatric Appendicitis Score or Ultrasonography? In Search of a Better Diagnostic Tool in Indian Children with Lower Abdominal Pain

OBJECTIVES

To prospectively assess the performance of pediatric appendicitis score (PAS) in diagnosing acute appendicitis in the children with lower abdominal pain and correlated with ultrasound findings; and to assess the impact of the PAS on clinical outcome and its efficacy in differentiating between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis.

METHODS

A prospective study was done which included cases of lower abdominal pain. Appendectomy was done for PAS ≥ 6, and diagnosis was confirmed on histopathology. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was created to assess the PAS performance. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ultrasonography in diagnosing appendicitis were assessed, and analysis of agreement between ultrasonography and PAS score was done by kappa statistics.

RESULTS

Of 260 cases with lower abdominal pain, 205 were suspected of having appendicitis. One hundred fifty-nine had PAS ≥ 6. There were 2/159 (1.26%) cases of negative appendectomies and 2/46 (4.34%) cases of missed appendicitis. The mean PAS was significantly higher in patients with appendicitis than in those without appendicitis. The area under the ROC curve was 0.9925. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of PAS were 98.74%, 95.65%, 95.7% and 95.65%, respectively. Complicated appendicitis had significantly more PAS, fever, and cough tenderness than uncomplicated appendicitis. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography were 86.79% and 17.39%, respectively. Agreement between ultrasonography-proven appendicitis and PAS-dependent appendicitis was weak.

CONCLUSION

PAS has high efficacy in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Clinical outcome was more favorable with the use of PAS. Ultrasonography should be used judiciously and in combination with clinical judgment.

Value of ultrasound and computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis with histopathology as gold standard

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the value of ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT) and laboratory testing in diagnosing acute appendicitis and to evaluate the impact on the treatment of acute appendicitis, keeping histopathology as the gold standard. Retrospective evaluation of all patients treated surgically for appendicitis from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2018 at Sint-Andries Hospital, Tielt, Belgium.

METHODS

For each patient, we recorded: age, sex, duration of hospitalization, type of radiological investigation, fever (>37.3 °C), C-reactive protein (CRP), leukocyte particle count (LPC), Alvarado score and the type of surgery. For US and CT sensitivity, specificity and negative appendectomy rate were evaluated.

RESULTS

Over a period of 3 years, 304 appendectomies were performed. The overall prevalence of appendicitis was 95.1%. Mean age was 31 years. All patients underwent radiological examination. US was performed in 35.9% (109), CT in 50.3% (153) and CT after US in 13.8% (42) of all cases. The sensitivity and specificity of CT were 99.4% and 80.0%, respectively. For US, the respective figures were 74.8 and 62.5%. CRP and LPC were significantly higher in the appendicitis group, compared to the non-appendicitis group. The negative appendectomy rate was slightly higher in the CT after US group i.e. 7.1% (3/42) compared to 4.67% (5/107) in the US group and 4.50% (7/155) in the CT group.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic value of US and CT are both very high. The diagnostic value of clinical features and biochemistry alone is quite low. By combining radiological examination, clinical examination and laboratory values, low negative appendectomy rates can be achieved.

Appendicitis in pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography

OBJECTIVES

The accuracy of ultrasound in the detection of appendicitis in pregnant women was examined in a meta-analysis.

METHODS

Pregnant women with suspected acute appendicitis were evaluated using ultrasound in a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from January 1, 2011 to August 10, 2023. The sensitivity and specificity values and diagnostic odds ratios were obtained using the pooled data.

RESULTS

A total of 239 patients were studied in four relevant investigations. Ultrasonography has a sensitivity of 56% and a specificity of 88% for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.66%. Ultrasonography had a positive likelihood ratio of 4.65 (95% confidence interval, 1.42-15.23) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.50 (95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.62). There was no evidence of publication bias (p = 0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound has moderate sensitivity for identifying appendicitis in pregnant women and may be utilized as an alternative diagnostic method.

Up-to-Date Diagnostic CT Standards for Acute Appendicitis: Wall Thickness and Intraluminal Fluid Thickness

Acute appendicitis is a prevalent condition that requires accurate and timely diagnosis and management to avoid potential complications. Classically, the diagnosis of appendicitis is made using the appendicular outer-to-outer wall diameter. In this study, we examined the sensitivity and specificity of computed tomography (CT) scans for diagnosing acute appendicitis using wall thickness and lumen thickness rather than diameter. This study included data from 350 patients who presented to the emergency department with clinically suspected acute appendicitis. All patients underwent a CT scan, and 62 radiologically positive patients underwent surgery. A radiological diagnosis was made using the conventional outer-to-outer wall diameter with a cut-off of 6 mm for a positive diagnosis. These 62 positive CT scans were reviewed and compared with surgical results. The study showed that a threshold of 2.25 mm for appendicular lumen thickness is an excellent diagnostic tool for acute appendicitis, demonstrating a high sensitivity of 96.4% and a lower specificity of 67%. In contrast, 1.6 mm wall thickness indicates acute appendicitis, with 81.8% sensitivity and 84% specificity. However, the wall thickness remains inferior to the conventionally used measurement of 6.75 mm for appendicular diameter, with a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 100%.

A Study of Misconceptions About Appendicitis Among the Resident Population of the Aseer Region

BACKGROUND

Appendicitis is a common abdominal emergency requiring swift medical intervention. Misconceptions about this condition can lead to delayed diagnosis and potentially life-threatening complications. In the Aseer region of Saudi Arabia, where healthcare accessibility and awareness levels vary, addressing such misconceptions is of paramount importance. The aim of this study is to investigate and identify the prevalent misconceptions regarding appendicitis among the resident population of the Aseer region. Understanding the prevalent misconceptions and knowledge gaps is essential to develop targeted educational interventions and enhance public awareness.

METHODS

This study utilized a cross-sectional study design to investigate misconceptions about appendicitis among residents in the Aseer region. Over a period of three months, 329 Aseer region resident population were interviewed. The symptoms, causes, diagnosis, treatment, and preventive measures of appendicitis were all covered in a questionnaire that was created to gather information on people's knowledge of appendicitis. Data were collected using an online questionnaire. Descriptive analysis was performed using frequencies and percentages, while inferential analysis employed appropriate statistical tests such as chi-square.

RESULTS

 The study's 329 participants were made up of 56% men and 44% women. 40% of the sample size was between the ages of 18 and 30, 26% were between the ages of 31 and 40, 15% were between the ages of 41 and 50, and 10% were above 50 years, with those under the age of 18 years accounting for the smallest proportion (9%). The majority of the respondents (37%) were college graduates, 25% were college students, 23% were in high school and 15% were in middle school. Chi-square tests were conducted to examine the associations between background knowledge and pain area, as well as between background knowledge and source of information. For the association between background knowledge and pain area, the Chi-square test yielded a significant result (X² = 9.104, p = 0.028); the Chi-square test also revealed a significant result (X² = 8.078, p = 0.044) between background knowledge and the source of information about appendicitis.

CONCLUSION

The analysis suggests a notable knowledge gap among the participants, with a significant portion displaying limited understanding or responding with "I don't know" when queried about appendicitis. It is important to note that this observation includes middle school students, who may be too young to be expected to possess knowledge about medical conditions. Additionally, there appears to be gender-related variation in opinions, misconceptions, and understanding regarding appendicitis.

Rapid MRI Abdomen for Assessment of Clinically Suspected Acute Appendicitis in the General Adult Population: a Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic review on the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the abdomen to evaluate clinically suspected appendicitis in the general adult population. We examined the diagnostic accuracy, the reported trends of MRI use, and the factors that affect the utility of MRI abdomen, including study duration and cost-benefits.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search on PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. We enrolled primary studies investigating the use of MRI in diagnosing appendicitis in the general adult population, excluding studies that predominantly reported on populations not representative of typical adult appendicitis presentations, such as those focusing on paediatric or pregnant populations.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven eligible primary studies and 6 secondary studies were included, totaling 2,044 patients from eight countries. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for diagnosing appendicitis were 96% (95% CI: 93-97%) and 93% (95% CI: 80-98%), respectively. MRI can identify complicated appendicitis and accurately propose alternative diagnoses. The duration of MRI protocols in each primary study ranged between 2.26 and 30 minutes, and only one study used intravenous contrast agents in addition to the non-contrast sequences. Decision analysis suggests significant benefits for replacing computed tomography (CT) with MRI and a potential for cost reduction. Reported trends in MRI usage showed minimal utilisation in diagnostic settings even when MRI was available.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI accurately diagnoses appendicitis in the general adult population and improves the identification of complicated appendicitis or alternative diagnoses compared to other modalities using a single, rapid investigation.

Properties of ultrasound-rapid MRI clinical diagnostic pathway in suspected pediatric appendicitis-A prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

to determine diagnostic accuracy of an US-MRI clinical diagnostic pathway to detect appendicitis in the emergency department (ED).

STUDY DESIGN

prospective cohort study of 624 previously healthy children 4-17 years old undergoing US for suspected appendicitis and clinical re-assessment. Children with non-diagnostic USs and persistent appendicitis concern/conclusive US-reassessment discrepancies underwent ultra-rapid MRI (US-MRI pathway), interpreted as positive, negative or non-diagnostic. Cases with missed appendicitis, negative appendectomies, and CT utilization were considered clinically diagnostically inaccurate. Primary outcome was the proportion of accurate diagnoses of appendicitis/lack thereof by the pathway.

RESULTS

150/624 (24%) children had appendicitis;255 USs (40.9%) were non-diagnostic. Of 139 US-MRI pathway children (after 117 non-diagnostic and 22 conclusive USs), 137 [98.6%; 95% CI 0.96-1.00] had clinically accurate outcomes (1 CT, 1 negative appendectomy): sensitivity 18/18 [100%], specificity 119/121 [98.3%], positive predictive value 18/20 [90.5%], negative predictive value 119/119 [100%]. MRI imaging accuracy was 134/139 (96.4%); 3 MRIs were non-diagnostic (no appendicitis). In the overall algorithm, 616/624 [98.7% (0.97-0.99)] patients had accurate outcomes: 147/150 (98.0%) appendicitis cases had confirmatory surgeries (3 CTs) and 469/474 (98.9%) appendicitis-negative children had no surgery/CT.

CONCLUSION

this study demonstrated high clinical accuracy of the US-rapid-MRI pathway in suspected pediatric appendicitis after non-diagnostic US.

How to Critically Appraise and Interpret Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy: A User Guide

Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies can provide the best available evidence to inform decisions regarding the use of a diagnostic test. In this guide, the authors provide a practical approach for clinicians to appraise diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews and apply their results to patient care. The first step is to identify an appropriate systematic review with a research question matching the clinical scenario. The user should evaluate the rigor of the review methods to evaluate its credibility (Did the review use clearly defined eligibility criteria, a comprehensive search strategy, structured data collection, risk of bias and applicability appraisal, and appropriate meta-analysis methods?). If the review is credible, the next step is to decide whether the diagnostic performance is adequate for clinical use (Do sensitivity and specificity estimates exceed the threshold that makes them useful in clinical practice? Are these estimates sufficiently precise? Is variability in the estimates of diagnostic accuracy across studies explained?). Diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews that are judged to be credible and provide diagnostic accuracy estimates with sufficient certainty and relevance are the most useful to inform patient care. This review discusses comparative, noncomparative, and emerging approaches to systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy using a clinical scenario and examples based on recent publications.

Adherence to the Antibiotic Prophylaxis Guidelines for Appendectomy in Bahrain: An Observational Study

Background Appendicitis is a common clinical problem that has multifactorial etiologies. Accounting for almost 1 million hospital days per year, it poses serious health hazards. If not treated on time, it may burst. Surgical intervention is the best option in such cases. Prophylactic use of antibiotics has been shown to reduce post-operative infections. Methodology This prospective observational study aimed to evaluate the adherence to the antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines for appendectomy in patients admitted to the surgical department at Salmanyia Medical Complex in Bahrain from January to August 2020. From the electronic records of these patients, information was extracted and evaluated regarding demographic data, the type of antibiotics given for prophylaxis, the timing of the administration of the antibiotics, and any alternative antibiotic given based on local hospital guidelines. Results The current study revealed that the majority of the patients (98%, N=273) admitted to the Salmanyia Medical Complex, Bahrain, were not administered the antibiotics within the prescribed time (30-60 minutes) as per hospital guidelines. Also, the antibiotics administered for prophylaxis prior to the appendectomy procedure were not according to the guidelines, i.e., Cefazolin 1g with Metronidazole 500 mg. Out of a total of 278 patients included in the study, none were administered the right choice as provided by the local guidelines. Second, 1.8% of patients (5 out of 278) were not administered any antibiotics for prophylaxis prior to the surgical procedure for appendicitis. Conclusion The study concluded that most patients were not administered antibiotics according to the local guidelines of the hospital.

Endoscopic Retrograde Appendicitis Therapy: Is it Really a Need of the Hour?

ABSTRACT

Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) has emerged as a promising, non-invasive treatment for acute uncomplicated appendicitis (AUA). ERAT involves cannulation, appendicography, appendiceal stone extraction, appendiceal lumen irrigation, and stent deployment. Recent randomized trials comparing ERAT to laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) have provided promising results in terms of safety and efficacy of ERAT. If the current trajectory of research and development is maintained, ERAT will likely become a strong contender for the standard of care for AUA. Standardized training and credentialing for ERAT, akin to procedures established for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, will be pivotal to global adoption of this modality.

Imaging of Right Lower Quadrant Pain in Children and Adolescents: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

Right lower quadrant (RLQ) pain is a common clinical presentation in children, and accurate clinical diagnosis remains challenging given that this nonspecific presentation is associated with numerous surgical and nonsurgical conditions. The broad differential diagnosis varies by patient age and sex. Important considerations in the selection of a diagnostic imaging strategy include the sequencing, performance, and cost of tests. This article provides a comprehensive narrative review of the diagnostic imaging of RLQ pain in children and adolescents, including a discussion of the complementary roles of ultrasound, CT, and MRI; description of key imaging findings based on available evidence; and presentation of salient differential diagnoses. Subspecialized pediatric emergency medicine and surgical perspectives are also provided as further clinical insight into this common, but often challenging, scenario. Finally, the current status of imaging of RLQ pain in children and adolescents is summarized on the basis of expert consensus.

Complicated appendicitis in an adult patient

Introduction

Appendicitis is a common cause for emergency operations in the western part of the world, mostly affecting children and young adults. Ultrasound in well-trained hands is an effective imaging tool in making this diagnosis; however, this does not come without its challenges and potential complications.

Case report

This is a case of a 19-year-old male with one-day history of severe pain in the right iliac fossa; blood results showed raised inflammatory markers. Ultrasound revealed a large abnormal loop of bowel containing heterogeneously echogenic contents, and two large appendicoliths at the base and fundus, with the presence of free fluid in the right iliac fossa and oedema in the adjacent mesentery. Laparoscopic appendectomy confirmed the presence of severe appendicitis with generalised peritonitis and appendicolith. Histology revealed gangrenous appendicitis with perforation in two places.

Discussion

This case demonstrates that making a diagnosis of an inflamed appendix alone on ultrasound is not enough, and conducting a detailed assessment of the inflamed appendix and its surrounding anatomy is essential so that all the associated findings can be reported to aid in the patient management, reduce hospital stay and improve overall diagnosis and prognosis.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Right Lower Quadrant Pain: 2022 Update

This document focuses on imaging in the adult and pregnant populations with right lower quadrant (RLQ) abdominal pain, including patients with fever and leukocytosis. Appendicitis remains the most common surgical pathology responsible for RLQ abdominal pain in the United States. Other causes of RLQ pain include right colonic diverticulitis, ureteral stone, and infectious enterocolitis. Appropriate imaging in the diagnosis of appendicitis has resulted in decreased negative appendectomy rate from as high as 25% to approximately 1% to 3%. Contrast-enhanced CT remains the primary and most appropriate imaging modality to evaluate this patient population. MRI is approaching CT in sensitivity and specificity as this technology becomes more widely available and utilization increases. Unenhanced MRI and ultrasound remain the diagnostic procedures of choice in the pregnant patient. MRI and ultrasound continue to perform best in the hands of the experts. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer-reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances in which peer-reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Ultrasonic breast tumor extraction based on adversarial mechanism and active contour

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Breast cancer is a high incidence of gynecological diseases; breast ultrasound screening can effectively reduce the mortality rate of breast cancer. In breast ultrasound images, the localization and segmentation of tumor lesions are important steps for the extraction of lesions, which helps clinicians evaluate breast lesions quantitatively and makes better clinical diagnosis of the disease. However, the segmentation of breast lesions is difficult due to the blurred and uneven edges of some lesions. In this paper, we propose a segmentation framework combining active contour module and deep learning adversarial mechanism and apply it for the segmentation of breast tumor lesions.

METHOD

We use a conditional adversarial network as the main framework. The generator is a segmentation network consisting of a Deformed U-Net and an active contour module. Here, the Deformed U-Net performs pixel-level segmentation for breast ultrasound images. The active contour module refines the tumor lesion edges, and the refined result provides loss information for Deformed U-Net. Therefore, the Deformed U-Net can better classify the edge pixels. The discriminator is the Markov discriminator; this discriminator provides loss feedback for the segmentation network. We cross-train the discriminator and segmentation network to implement Adversarial Mechanism for getting a more optimized segmentation network.

RESULTS

The segmentation performance of the segmentation network for breast ultrasound images is improved by adding a Markov discriminator to provide discriminant loss training. The proposed method for segmenting the tumor lesions in breast ultrasound image obtains dice coefficient: 89.7%, accuracy: 98.1%, precision: 86.3%, mean-intersection-over-union: 82.2%, recall: 94.7%, specificity: 98.5% and F1score: 89.7%.

CONCLUSION

Comparing with traditional methods, the proposed method gives better performance. The experimental results show that the proposed method can effectively segment the lesions in breast ultrasound images, and then assist doctors to realize the diagnosis of breast lesions.

Optimising the treatment for uncomplicated acute appendicitis (OPTIMA trial): a protocol for a multicentre, randomised, double-blinded placebo-controlled study

INTRODUCTION

Emerging evidence has shown that an antibiotic first strategy is a viable treatment option for uncomplicated acute appendicitis (AA). Although there has recently been an interest and increase in the use of antibiotics as the primary strategy for treating uncomplicated AA, there is no consensus regarding the optimum antibiotic regimen. In particular, the long-term outcomes of different antibiotic regimens, such as the recurrence rate, still lack evidence. Given that the flora of the appendix is mainly anaerobic bacteria, we hypothesised that antianaerobe regimens could decrease the recurrence rate compared with those that did not include antianaerobic antibiotics.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The OPTIMA(Optimising the treatment for uncomplicated acute appendicitis) trial is a multicentre, double-blinded placebo-controlled superiority randomised study aimed to evaluate the role of antianaerobic antibiotics in the resolution of uncomplicated AA. Patients (18-65 years) with uncomplicated AA (without gangrenous, perforated appendicitis, appendiceal abscess, or appendiceal fecaliths) are eligible for inclusion. The primary endpoint of this study is the success rate of the treatment, defined as the resolution of AA resulting in discharge from the hospital without surgical intervention and recurrent symptoms within one year. Secondary endpoints include mortality, postintervention complications, recurrent symptoms up to one year after treatment, hospital stay, sick leave, treatment cost, pain symptom scores and quality of life. Data are reported as the number of cases (%), median (range) and relative risk, which will be analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test or χ² test, as appropriate. P-value<0.05 will be considered significant.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Jinling Hospital on 13 November 2018 (2018NZKY-027-01). The trial findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR1800018896.

Can The 'Speed Bump Sign' Be a Diagnostic Tool for Acute Appendicitis? Evidence-Based Appraisal by Meta-Analysis and GRADE

OBJECTIVES

The 'speed bump sign' is a clinical symptom characterised by aggravated abdominal pain while driving over speed bumps. This study aimed to perform a diagnostic meta-analysis, rate the certainty of evidence (CoE) and analyse the applicability of the speed bump sign in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four databanks and websites were systemically searched, and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 was used to evaluate the risk of bias. Meta-analysis was assessed by MIDAS commands in Stata 15. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was applied to examine the CoE.

RESULTS

Four studies with 343 participants were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.94 (95% CI (confidence interval) = 0.83-0.98; I2 = 79%) and 0.49 (95% CI = 0.33-0.66; I2 = 67%), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.78 (95% CI = 0.74-0.81). The diagnostic odds ratio was 14.1 (95% CI = 3.6-55.7). The pooled positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR (+) and LR (-)) were 1.84 (95% CI = 1.30-2.61) and 0.13 (95% CI = 0.04-0.41), respectively. According to Fagan's nomogram plot, when the pretest probabilities were 25%, 50% and 75%, the related posttest probabilities increased to 38%, 65% and 85% calculated through LR (+), respectively, and the posttest probabilities were 4%, 12% and 28% calculated through LR (-), respectively. The overall CoEs were low and very low in sensitivity and specificity, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence shows that the speed bump sign is a useful 'rule-out' test for diagnosing acute appendicitis. With good accessibility, the speed bump sign may be added as a routine part of taking the history of patients with abdominal pain.

The utility of spectral Doppler evaluation of acute appendicitis

PURPOSE

The use of spectral Doppler, peak systolic velocity (PSV), and resistive index (RI) imaging criteria to improve the accuracy of acute appendicitis diagnosis is hypothesized.

METHODS

Graded compression ultrasound was performed for suspected patients. The spectral Doppler evaluation was conducted while observing the appendix. A total of 152 patients (82 males and 70 females, ages 4-63 years, mean age of 24.5 years) were examined using the spectral Doppler waveform between 2018 and 2019. RI and PSV values of patients with and without appendicitis were compared to histopathologic findings. SPSS 26 was used to analyze the data, including using descriptive statistics and measures of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).

RESULTS

Appendicitis was confirmed in 95 patients (62.5%) and rejected in 57 patients (37.5%). For the diagnosis of appendicitis, the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) for RI (0.92 with 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88, 0.97; P = 0.001) and PSV (0.96, with 95% CI: 0.93, 1.00; P = 0.001) was calculated. The discriminatory RI ≥ 0.49 demonstrated high sensitivity (90.5%) and low specificity (86%), and the discriminatory PSV ≥ 9.6 cm/s had high specificity (94.7%) and sensitivity (94.7%) for appendicitis.

CONCLUSION

By incorporating spectral Doppler criteria into routine graded compression ultrasound, the diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis was increased. In comparison, high PSV and RI values of the appendix with a cut-off point of 9.6 cm/s and 0.49 differ significantly between positive and negative appendectomy patients.

Low-Dose Abdominal CT for Evaluating Suspected Appendicitis in Adolescents and Young Adults: Review of Evidence

Due to its excellent diagnostic performance, CT is the mainstay of diagnostic test in adults with suspected acute appendicitis in many countries. Although debatable, extensive epidemiological studies have suggested that CT radiation is carcinogenic, at least in children and adolescents. Setting aside the debate over the carcinogenic risk of CT radiation, the value of judicious use of CT radiation cannot be overstated for the diagnosis of appendicitis, considering that appendicitis is a very common disease, and that the vast majority of patients with suspected acute appendicitis are adolescents and young adults with average life expectancies. Given the accumulated evidence justifying the use of low-dose CT (LDCT) of only 2 mSv, there is no reasonable basis to insist on using radiation dose of multi-purpose abdominal CT for the diagnosis of appendicitis, particularly in adolescents and young adults. Published data strongly suggest that LDCT is comparable to conventional dose CT in terms of clinical outcomes and diagnostic performance. In this narrative review, we will discuss such evidence for reducing CT radiation in adolescents and young adults with suspected appendicitis.

The Dynamics of Inflammatory Markers in Patients with Suspected Acute Appendicitis

Background: Laboratory tests of inflammatory mediators are routinely used in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences of dynamics of inflammatory markers of the blood in patients with suspected acute appendicitis between complicated AA (CAA), non-complicated AA (NAA), and when AA was excluded (No-AA). Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients presented to the Emergency Department (ER) of a tertiary hospital center during a three-year period. All patients suspected of acute appendicitis were prospectively registered from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2018. The dynamics of inflammatory markers of the blood between different types of AA (No-AA, NAA or CAA) during different periods of time are presented. Results: A total of 453 patients were included in the study, with 297 patients in the No-AA group, 99 in the NAA group, and 57 in the CAA group. White blood cell (WBC) count in the No-AA decreased with time, with a statistically significant difference between the <8 h and 25–72 h group. The neutrophils (NEU) percentage decreased in the No-AA group and was statistically significantly different between the <8 h and 25–72 h and <8 h and >72 h groups. C-reactive protein (CRP) increased significantly in the No-AA group throughout all time intervals, and from the first 24 h to the 25–72 h in the NAA and CAA groups. There was a statistically significant difference between the WBC count between No-AA, NAA, and No-AA and CAA groups during the first 24 and 24–48 h. There was a statistically significant difference between NEU percentage and LYMP percentage and in the NEU/LYMP ratio between No-AA and CAA groups through all time periods. CRP was significantly higher in the first 24 h in the CAA than in the No-AA group, and in the 24–48 h in the CAA group than in the No-AA and NAA groups. The linear logistic regression model, involving inflammatory mediators and clinical characteristics, showed mediocre diagnostic accuracy for diagnosing AA with an AUC of 0.737 (0.671–0.802). Conclusions: Increasing concentrations of inflammatory markers are more characteristic in CAA patients than in No-AA during the first 48 h after onset of the disease. A combination of laboratory tests with clinical signs and symptoms has a mediocre diagnostic accuracy in suspecting AA.

Neonatal and Pediatric Bowel Obstruction: Imaging Guidelines and Recommendations

Pediatric bowel obstructions are one of the most common surgical emergencies in children, and imaging plays a vital role in the evaluation and diagnosis. An evidence-based and practical imaging approach to diagnosing and localizing pediatric bowel obstructions is essential for optimal pediatric patient care. This article discusses an up-to-date practical diagnostic imaging algorithm for pediatric bowel obstructions and presents the imaging spectrum of pediatric bowel obstructions and their underlying causes.

Incisional hernia appendicitis: A unique case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Incisional hernia appendicitis is very rare. Very few papers have been published reporting about Pfannenstiel incision hernia with appendicitis. Here we report one such case of Pfannenstiel hernia with appendicitis.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 20 years old lady presented with a tender mass in the right iliac fossa after Pfannenstiel incision. Ultra-sonography showed an incisional hernia with a 12.1 mm defect at the site of the incision. A provisional diagnosis of strangulated hernia was made. Acute appendicitis was diagnosed intra-operatively. Appendectomy followed by primary repair of the hernia was done. The patient had an uneventful recovery postoperatively and was discharged on the third day without any complications. Histopathology confirmed appendicitis.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Amyand originally documented the presence of appendix within external hernias. The presence of appendicitis within an incisional hernia is even rarer. Hypermobility of the cecum, inflammatory adhesions from surgery and defects created during surgery have been considered as the pathological basis of such incisional hernias. A classic presentation of appendicitis may be absent in cases of incisional hernia appendicitis. Deviation from usual clinical symptoms often deviates from treating surgeons to assume it as strangulated/incarcerated hernia. Incisional hernia appendicitis management consists of appendectomy followed by subsequent primary hernia repair. The use of mesh for repair is not preferred.

CONCLUSION

Incisional hernia appendicitis diagnosis is almost always intraoperative. As the incidence of incisional hernia appendicitis is low, awareness about the possibility of its occurrence is essential to formulate a well-planned intra-operative strategy.

Abbreviated MRI in patients with suspected acute appendicitis in emergency: a prospective study

PURPOSE

To determine the diagnostic performance of an abbreviated non-contrast MRI protocol in diagnosing acute appendicitis.

METHODS

Prospectively, a total of 67 consenting consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis (Alvarado score ≥ 5) were evaluated with an abbreviated three-sequence non-contrast MRI protocol (axial T2WI, coronal T2WI, axial DWI) at a single tertiary care center. MRI was interpreted by two radiologists blinded to the clinical details, other investigations, and outcome of the patients. Diagnostic performance of MRI was determined using either histopathological examination (HPE) results as the reference standard in surgical cases (n = 39), or final clinical diagnosis at discharge and 3-months follow-up in non-operatively managed cases (n = 28).

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients comprising 42 males, 25 females including 1 pregnant patient were enrolled (median age 24 years; age range 6-70 years). The median acquisition duration of the MRI protocol was 12.5 min. In the analysis of the complete cohort including both surgical and non-operatively managed cases (n = 67), MRI showed sensitivity of 93.3% (95% CI 81.7-98.6%), specificity of 86.4% (95% CI 65.1-97.1%), and diagnostic accuracy of 91.0% (95% CI 81.5-96.6%) (p < 0.001). In the subset of surgical cases with HPE as the reference standard (n = 39), MRI showed sensitivity of 97.1% (95% CI 84.7-99.9%), specificity of 100% (95% CI 47.8-100%), and diagnostic accuracy of 98% (95% CI 87.5-100%) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

MRI may be performed to diagnose acute appendicitis or alternative causes of right iliac fossa pain. An abbreviated MRI protocol consisting of only three sequences without IV contrast, patient preparation, or antiperistaltic agents could shorten the examination duration while retaining diagnostic accuracy.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Provides Useful Diagnostic Information Following Equivocal Ultrasound in Children With Suspected Appendicitis

PURPOSE

In Canada, ultrasonography is the primary imaging modality for children with suspected appendicitis, yet equivocal studies are common. Magnetic resonance imaging provides promise as an adjunct imaging strategy. The primary objective of this study was to determine the proportion of children with suspected appendicitis and equivocal ultrasound where magnetic resonance imaging determined a diagnosis.

METHODS

A prospective consecutive cohort of children aged 5-17 years presenting to a tertiary pediatric Emergency Department with suspected appendicitis were enrolled. Participants underwent diagnostic and management strategies according to our local suspected appendicitis pathway, followed by magnetic resonance (Siemens Avanto 1.5 Tesla) imaging. Sub-specialty pediatric radiologists reported all images.

RESULTS

Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 101 children with suspected appendicitis. The mean age was 11.9 (SD 3.4) years and median Pediatric Appendicitis Score was 6 [IQR 4,8]. Ultrasonography was completed in 98/101 (97.0%). Of 53/98 (54.1%) with equivocal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging provided further diagnostic information in 41 (77.4%; 10 positive, 31 negative; 12 remained equivocal). Secondary findings of appendicitis on magnetic resonance imaging in children with equivocal ultrasound included abdominal free fluid (24, 45.3%), peri-appendiceal fluid (12, 22.6%), intraluminal appendiceal fluid (9, 17.0%), fat stranding (8, 15.1%), appendicolith (2, 3.8%), and peri-appendiceal abscess (1, 1.9%). The observed agreement between magnetic resonance imaging results and final diagnosis was 94.9% (kappa = 0.89).

Imaging of acute pelvic pain

Acute pelvic pain (APP) requires urgent medical evaluation and treatment. Differential diagnosis of APP is broad, including a variety of gynecologic and non-gynecologic/ urinary, gastrointestinal, vascular and other entities. Close anatomical and physiological relations of pelvic structures, together with similar clinical presentation of different disorders and overlapping of symptoms, especially in the emergency background, make the proper diagnosis of APP challenging. Imaging plays a crucial role in the fast and precise diagnosis of APP. Ultrasonography is the first-line imaging modality, often accompanied by CT, while MRI is utilized in specific cases, using short, tailored protocols. Recognizing the cause of APP in females is a challenging task, due to the wide spectrum of possible origin and overlap of their imaging features. Therefore, the radiologist has to be familiar with the possible causes of APP, and, relying on clinical presentation, together with laboratory findings, choose the best imaging strategy in order to establish a fast and accurate diagnosis.

Acute Appendicitis in the Elderly: A Literature Review on an Increasingly Frequent Surgical Problem

With increased life expectancy and the growing total population of elderly patients, there has been rise in the number of cases of acute appendicitis in elderly people. Although acute appendicitis is not the most typical pathological condition in the elderly, it is not uncommon. Most of these patients require surgical treatment, and as with any acute surgical pathology in advanced age, treatment possibilities are affected by comorbidities, overall health status, and an increased risk of complications. In this literature review we discuss differences in acute appendicitis in the elderly population, with a focus on clinical signs, diagnostics, pathogenesis, treatment, and results.

Abdominal fellowship-trained versus generalist radiologist accuracy when interpreting MR and CT for the diagnosis of appendicitis

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of generalist radiologists working in a community setting against abdominal radiologists working in an academic setting for the interpretation of MR when diagnosing acute appendicitis among emergency department patients.

METHODS

This observational study examined MR image interpretation (non-contrast MR with diffusion-weighted imaging and intravenous contrast-enhanced MR) from a prospectively enrolled cohort at an academic hospital over 18 months. Eligible patients had an abdominopelvic CT ordered to evaluate for appendicitis and were > 11 years old. The reference standard was a combination of surgery and pathology results, phone follow-up, and chart review. Six radiologists blinded to clinical information, three each from community and academic practices, independently interpreted MR and CT images in random order. We calculated test characteristics for both individual and group (consensus) diagnostic accuracy then performed Chi-square tests to identify any differences between the subgroups.

RESULTS

Analysis included 198 patients (114 women) with a mean age of 31.6 years and an appendicitis prevalence of 32.3%. For generalist radiologists, the sensitivity and specificity (95% confidence interval) were 93.8% (84.6-98.0%) and 88.8% (82.2-93.2%) for MR and 96.9% (88.7-99.8%) and 91.8% (85.8-95.5%) for CT. For fellowship-trained radiologists, the sensitivity and specificity were 96.9% (88.2-99.5%) and 89.6% (82.8-94%) for MR and 98.4% (90.5-99.9%) and 93.3% (87.3-96.7%) for CT. No statistically significant differences were detected between radiologist groups (p = 1.0, p = 0.53, respectively) or when comparing MR to CT (p = 0.21, p = 0.17, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

MR is a reliable, radiation-free imaging alternative to CT for the evaluation of appendicitis in community-based generalist radiology practices.

KEY POINTS

• There was no significant difference in MR image interpretation accuracy between generalist and abdominal fellowship-trained radiologists when evaluating sensitivity (p = 1.0) and specificity (p = 0.53). • There was no significant difference in accuracy comparing MR to CT imaging for diagnosing appendicitis for either sensitivity (p = 0.21) or specificity (p = 0.17). • With experience, generalist radiologists enhanced their MR interpretation accuracy as demonstrated by improved interpretation sensitivity (OR 2.89 CI 1.44-5.77, p = 0.003) and decreased mean interpretation time (5 to 3.89 min).

Systematic review of Meckel's diverticulum in pregnancy

INTRODUCTION

Meckel's diverticulum (MD) is the most common congenital malformation in the gastrointestinal tract. Limited up-to-date evidence is available regarding MD in pregnancy. We aim to review the available pertinent literature to help support clinical decision making and patient management in the future.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The search term 'Meckel's diverticulum' was combined with 'pregnant' or 'pregnancy'. Database searches of EMBASE, Medline and PubMed were conducted. All papers published in English from 01/01/1990 to 01/01/2021 were included. Simple statistical analysis (t-test) was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven cases were included. Average age = 26.9 years. Average gestation = 25.1 weeks. Occurrence: first trimester = 3.7%; second trimester = 48.1% and third trimester = 48.1%. Presenting symptoms: abdominal pain 88.9%; nausea/vomiting 59.3%; fever 18.5%; abdominal distension 18.5%; haematochezia 11.1%; constipation 11.1%; haematemesis 3.7%, diarrhoea 3.7% and asymptomatic 3.7%. Mean duration of preceding symptoms = 3.4 days. Diagnostic imaging modalities utilised: ultrasound = 40.7%; CT = 25.9%; MRI = 14.8%; abdominal X-ray = 11.1% and endoscopy = 7.4%. All cases required definite surgical management: laparotomy = 65.4%; laparoscopy = 15.4%; C-section = 19.2% and unreported = 3.8%. Main intra-operative findings: perforated MD = 40.7%; intussusception with MD as a lead point = 11.1%; bleeding MD = 11.1%, inflamed MD = 11.1%; small bowel obstruction = 11.1%; gangrenous MD = 3.7%; volvulus = 3.7% and unspecified = 7.4%. Mean length from ileocolic junction = 51.7 cm. Average length of stay was 7.1 days. T-test (p-value = 0.12) when comparing management strategy. Three maternal complications and two foetal mortalities.

CONCLUSION

MD and associated pathology are difficult to diagnose in the pregnant cohort. Current imaging demonstrates low diagnostic accuracy and a deviation away from recognised nuclear medicine investigations. Surgery appears the definitive management with both open and laparoscopic approaches utilised. Significant maternal morbidity and foetal mortality are associated with this condition.

Conditional CT Strategy-An Effective Tool to Reduce Negative Appendectomy Rate and the Overuse of the CT

(1) Background: Diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) remains challenging; either computed tomography (CT) is universally used or negative appendectomy rates of up to 30% are reported. Transabdominal ultrasound (TUS) as the first-choice imaging modality might be useful in adult patients to reduce the need for CT scans while maintaining low negative appendectomy (NA) rates. The aim of this study was to report the results of the conditional CT strategy for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. (2) Methods: All patients suspected of acute appendicitis were prospectively registered from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2018. Data on their clinical, radiological and surgical outcomes are presented. (3) Results: A total of 1855 patients were enrolled in our study: 1206 (65.0%) were women, 649 (35.0%) were men, and the median age was 34 years (IQR, 24.5–51). TUS was performed in 1851 (99.8%) patients, and CT in 463 (25.0%) patients. Appendices were not visualized on TUS in 1320 patients (71.3%). Furthermore, 172 (37.1%) of 463 CTs were diagnosed with AA, 42 (9.1%) CTs revealed alternative emergency diagnosis and 249 (53.8%) CTs were normal. Overall, 519 (28.0%) patients were diagnosed with AA: 464 appendectomies and 27 diagnostic laparoscopies were performed. The NA rate was 4.2%. The sensitivity and specificity for TUS and CT are as follows: 71.4% and 96.2%; 93.8% and 93.6%. (4) Conclusion: A conditional CT strategy is effective in reducing NA rates and avoids unnecessary CT in a large proportion of patients. Observation and repeated TUS might be useful in unclear cases.

Adult appendicitis: Clinical practice guidelines from the French Society of Digestive Surgery and the Society of Abdominal and Digestive Imaging

INTRODUCTION

The French Society of Digestive Surgery (SFCD) and the Society of Abdominal and Digestive Imaging (SIAD) have collaborated to propose recommendations for clinical practice in the management of adult appendicitis.

METHODS

An analysis of the literature was carried out according to the methodology of the French National Authority for Health (HAS). A selection was performed from collected references and then a manual review of the references listed in the selected articles was made in search of additional relevant articles. The research was limited to articles whose language of publication was English or French. Articles focusing on the pediatric population were excluded. Based on the literature review, the working group proposed recommendations whenever possible. These recommendations were reviewed and approved by a committee of experts.

RESULTS

Recommendations about appendicitis in adult patients were proposed with regard to clinical, laboratory and radiological diagnostic modalities, treatment strategy for uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis, surgical technique, and specificities in the case of macroscopically healthy appendix, terminal ileitis and appendicitis in the elderly and in pregnant women.

CONCLUSION

These recommendations for clinical practice may be useful to the surgeon in optimizing the management of acute appendicitis in adults.

Deciduosis of the Appendix During Pregnancy

Acute appendicitis is an important differential diagnosis in patients with right lower quadrant pain during pregnancy. Endometriosis, a hormone-related pathology, is another possibility. Patients with endometriosis are typically symptomatic before pregnancy. Stromal endometriosis is a variant of endometriosis that presents no symptoms before pregnancy but which occasionally presents with the new onset of symptoms during pregnancy. We report the case of a 35-year-old woman in her 8th month of pregnancy who presented with impending appendiceal rupture due to deciduosis of the appendix, a progesterone-related condition, during pregnancy. This case suggests that deciduosis/stromal endometriosis should be considered as a differential diagnosis of acute abdomen during pregnancy, even if the patient is asymptomatic before pregnancy.

Tumor classification in automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) based on a modified extracting feature network

People can get consistent Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS) images due to the imaging mechanism of scanning. Therefore, it has unique advantages in breast tumor classification using artificial intelligence technology. This paper proposes a method for classifying benign and malignant breast tumors using ABUS sequence based on deep learning. First, Images of Interest (IOI) will be extracted and Region of Interest (ROI) will be cropped in ABUS sequence by two preprocessing deep learning models, Extracting-IOI model and Cropping-ROI model. Then, we propose a Shallowly Dilated Convolutional Branch Network (SDCB-Net). We combine this network with the VGG16 transfer learning network to construct a brand-new Shared Extracting Feature Network (SEF-Net) to extract ROI sequence features. Finally, the correlation features of ABUS images are extracted and integrated by using GRU Classified Network (GRUC-Net) to achieve the accurate breast tumors classification. The final results show that the accuracy of the test set for classifying benign and malignant ABUS sequence is 92.86 %. This method not only has high accuracy but also greatly improves the speed and efficiency of breast tumor classification. It has high clinical application significance that more women can discover breast tumors timely.

Association between the computed tomography findings and operative time for interval appendectomy in children

PURPOSE

The purpose was to evaluate the association between operative time and findings noted on computed tomography (CT) immediately before interval appendectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-two children who underwent CT before interval appendectomy were included. We evaluated the association between operative time and these image findings: (1) appendicolith, (2) increased intra-abdominal fat density around the appendix, (3) location of the appendix, (4) ascites, (5) abscess formation and (6) maximum appendix outer wall diameter. Appendix location was classified as (#1) just below the anterior abdominal wall; (#2) retrocaecal or retro-ascending colon and (#3) pelvic. Results were analysed using Pearson's correlation coefficient or Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

The mean patient age and operative time were 116.24 ± 38.66 months (range, 31-195) and 67.76 ± 31.23 min (range, 30-179), respectively. Ascites was detected in only one case, and no abscess occurred in any patient; therefore, these findings were not analysed. Factors that significantly prolonged the operative time included increased intra-abdominal fat density around the appendix (absent, 59.43 ± 22.14 [range, 30-108] vs. present, 84.43 ± 40.13 [range, 32-179] min; P = 0.03) and retrocaecal or retro-ascending colon appendix (location 1, 40.83 ± 8.35 [range, 30-50]; location 2, 99.25 ± 18.56 [range, 74-135]; location 3, 64.54 ± 30.22 [range, 30-179] min; P < 0.01). There was a weak but significant association between maximum appendix outer wall diameter and operative time (R = 0.353; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

These pre-operative CT findings are important predictors of operative time for interval appendectomy. Radiologists and surgeons should use these specific image findings to predict the operative time and need for additional procedures during an interval appendectomy.

The Diagnostic Efficacy of MRI in the Evaluation of the Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct in Children with Hearing Loss

Objective

The aim of our study is to evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared to computed tomography (CT) in the detection of enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) in childhood.

Methods

One hundred twenty-three children who underwent temporal bone CT and MRI examinations for hearing loss between 2013 and 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. All CT and MRI images were examined by two pediatric radiologists, according to the Valvassori and Cincinnati criteria for EVA. Imaging findings on CT and MRI of the vestibular aqueduct were recorded. Two pediatric radiologists performed the measurements for EVA on CT and MRI. In addition, an otolaryngologist performed the measurements independently. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of MRI compared to CT were calculated to detect EVA. The difference between the measurements on CT and MRI was investigated. The inter-observer agreement was evaluated for measurements.

Results

The mean age of 123 children (65 boys and 58 girls) was 50.18±50.40 months. Two hundred forty-six ears were evaluated in 123 children. On CT images, EVA was present in 28 (11.3%) of 246 ears according to Cincinnati criteria and 27 (10.9%) of 246 ears according to Valvassori criteria, respectively. While sensitivity, specificity, PPD, and NPD rates of MRI were 100%, 99%, 92.8%, and 100%, respectively, for Cincinnati criteria, for Valvassori criteria, they were 100%, 97.3%, 77.7%, and 100%, respectively. According to the visual evaluation performed without using measurement, the enlarged appearance of the vestibular aqueduct was significant for the diagnosis of EVA (p<0.001), while the absence of this appearance was significant for the exclusion of EVA (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between the measurements on CT and MRI. There was a perfect correlation between the observers for measurements.

Conclusion

MRI can be used as an initial imaging technique in children with suspicion of EVA to reduce radiation exposure.

NSQIP Based Predictors of False Negative and Indeterminate Ultrasounds in Adults With Appendicitis

BACKGROUND

It has been well established that ultrasound (US) is the initial screening tool for children with suspected acute appendicitis. However, computed tomography (CT) has become the standard screening modality for adults presenting with abdominal pain. A recent review of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data revealed US is being utilized as a screening modality in adults. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of US in evaluating adults with acute appendicitis.

STUDY DESIGN

The American College of Surgeons NSQIP and NSQIP Procedure Targeted Data Files were accessed and examined for all patients in 2016 and 2017 who received an US and underwent an appendectomy. The US results were then correlated to the pathology in order to determine the diagnostic performance. Additionally, we identified predictors for indeterminate and false negative US results.

RESULTS

Our study included 3607 appendectomy patients of which 1135 (30%) had an indeterminate US, 683 (18%) had an US not consistent with appendicitis, and 1789 (49%) had an US consistent with appendicitis. Sensitivity and Specificity were 74.3% and 53.0%, respectively. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) were 95.9% and 12.2%, respectively. On regression analysis, clinically relevant predictors for false negative and indeterminate studies included age, sex, and BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound is an effective initial imaging modality for acute appendicitis in the adult population. Females, age >30 y, and elevated BMI were more likely to have indeterminate or false negative results. These patients may benefit from CT as their initial screening test.

Differences between inflamed and non inflamed appendices diagnosed as acute appendicitis

Background

Despite the great advances in diagnostic methods, the incidence of the surgical removal of a morphologically normal appendix in patients with clinical and complementary signs of acute appendicitis continues to exceed 20%. This study aimed to compare the clinical, laboratory, and ultrasound findings of inflammatory and noninflammatory appendiceal disorders diagnosed as acute appendicitis.

Methods

The medical records of 208 patients with clinical, laboratory, and ultrasound findings indicative of acute appendicitis were studied. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 comprising 94 patients whose appendicular histological results suggested a normal appendix and group 2 comprising 114 patients with histopathological tests confirming acute appendicitis. The variables analyzed were age at the time of surgery, sex, nausea and vomiting, inappetence, fever, pain migrating to the right iliac fossa, pain on palpation of the right iliac fossa, Blumberg's sign, blood counts, ultrasound findings, and Alvarado score.

Results

An inflamed appendix was associated with inappetence, pain on palpation of the right iliac fossa, appendiceal diameter >6 mm, and Alvarado score >6 (p < 0.001). In contrast, fever was more frequently found in noninflammatory appendiceal disorders (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Inappetence, pain on palpation of the right iliac fossa, appendiceal diameter > 6 mm, and Alvarado score > 6 indicate an inflammatory appendiceal disease, whereas fever is more often present in noninflammatory appendiceal diseases.