Survival Rates after Thermal Ablation versus Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Stage 1 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A National Cancer Database Study

Multidimensional biological characteristics of ground glass nodules

The detection rate of ground glass nodules (GGNs) has increased in recent years because of their malignant potential but relatively indolent biological behavior; thus, correct GGN recognition and management has become a research focus. Many scholars have explored the underlying mechanism of the indolent progression of GGNs from several perspectives, such as pathological type, genomic mutational characteristics, and immune microenvironment. GGNs have different major mutated genes at different stages of development; EGFR mutation is the most common mutation in GGNs, and p53 mutation is the most abundant mutation in the invasive stage of GGNs. Pure GGNs have fewer genomic alterations and a simpler genomic profile and exhibit a gradually evolving genomic mutation profile as the pathology progresses. Compared to advanced lung adenocarcinoma, GGN lung adenocarcinoma has a higher immune cell percentage, is under immune surveillance, and has less immune escape. However, as the pathological progression and solid component increase, negative immune regulation and immune escape increase gradually, and a suppressive immune environment is established gradually. Currently, regular computer tomography monitoring and surgery are the main treatment strategies for persistent GGNs. Stereotactic body radiotherapy and radiofrequency ablation are two local therapeutic alternatives, and systemic therapy has been progressively studied for lung cancer with GGNs. In the present review, we discuss the characterization of the multidimensional molecular evolution of GGNs that could facilitate more precise differentiation of such highly heterogeneous lesions, laying a foundation for the development of more effective individualized treatment plans.

Stereotactic ablative brachytherapy versus percutaneous microwave ablation for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

To analyze the efficacy of stereotactic ablative brachytherapy (SABT) and percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) for the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients with early-stage (T1-T2aN0M0) NSCLC who underwent CT-guided SABT or MWA between October 2014 and March 2017 at four medical centers were retrospectively analyzed. Survival, treatment response, and procedure-related complications were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 83 patients were included in this study. The median follow-up time was 55.2 months (range 7.2-76.8 months). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 96.4%, 82.3%, and 68.4% for the SABT group (n = 28), and 96.4%, 79.7%, and 63.2% for MWA group (n = 55), respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 92.9%, 74.6%, and 54.1% for SABT, and 92.7%, 70.5%, and 50.5% for MWA, respectively. There were no significant differences between SABT and MWA in terms of OS (p = 0.631) or DFS (p = 0.836). The recurrence rate was also similar between the two groups (p = 0.809). No procedure-related deaths occurred. Pneumothorax was the most common adverse event in the two groups, with no significant difference. No radiation pneumonia was found in the SABT group.

CONCLUSIONS

SABT provided similar efficacy to MWA for the treatment of stage I NSCLC. SABT may be a treatment option for unresectable early-stage NSCLC. However, future prospective randomized studies are required to verify these results.

Treatment strategies for malignant pulmonary nodule: beyond lobectomy. Point-counterpoint

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Technological advancement in low-dose computed tomography resulted in an increased incidental discovery of early-stage lung cancer and multifocal ground glass opacity. The demand for parenchyma-preserving treatment strategies is greater now than ever. Pulmonary ablative therapy is a groundbreaking technique to offer local ablative treatment in a lung-sparing manner. It has become a promising technique in lung cancer management with its diverse applicability. In this article, we will review the current development of ablative therapy in lung and look into the future of this innovative technique.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current literature suggests that ablative therapy offers comparable local disease control to other local therapies and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), with a low risk of complications. In particular, bronchoscopic microwave ablation (BMWA) has considerably fewer pleural-based complications due to the avoidance of pleural puncture. BMWA can be considered in the multidisciplinary treatment pathway as it allows re-ablation and allows SBRT after BMWA.

SUMMARY

With the benefits which ablative therapy offers and its ability to incorporate into the multidisciplinary management pathway, we foresee ablative therapy, especially BMWA gaining significance in lung cancer treatment. Future directions on developing novel automated navigation platforms and the latest form of ablative energy would further enhance clinical outcomes for our patients.

Radiofrequency ablation for stage <IIB non-small cell lung cancer: Opportunities, challenges, and the road ahead

Pulmonary carcinoma represents the second common cancer for human race while its mortality rate ranked the first all over the world. Surgery remains the primary option for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in some surgical traditions. Nevertheless, only less than half of patients are operable subjected to the limited lung function and multiple primary/metastatic lesions. Recent improvements in minimally invasive surgical techniques have made the procedure accessible to more patients, but this percentage still does not exceed half. In recent years, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), one of the thermal ablation procedures, has gradually advanced in the treatment of lung cancer in addition to being utilized to treat breast and liver cancer. Several guidelines, including the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), include RFA as an option for some patients with NSCLC although the level of evidence is mostly limited to retrospective studies. In this review, we emphasize the use of the RFA technique in patients with early-stage NSCLC and provide an overview of the RFA indication population, prognosis status, and complications. Meanwhile, the advantages and disadvantages of RFA proposed in existing studies are compared with surgical treatment and radiotherapy. Due to the high rate of gene mutation and immunocompetence in NSCLC, there are considerable challenges to clinical translation of combining targeted drugs or immunotherapy with RFA that the field has only recently begun to fully appreciate.

Microwave ablation for the treatment of peripheral ground-glass nodule-like lung cancer: Long-term results from a multi-center study

Introduction

Microwave ablation (MWA) is an effective and safe approach for the treatment of ground-glass nodule (GGN)-like lung cancer, but long-term follow-up is warranted. Therefore, this multi-center retrospective study aimed to evaluate the results of MWA for the treatment of peripheral GGN-like lung cancer with a long-term follow-up.

Materials and Methods

From June 2013 to January 2018, a total of 87 patients (47 males and 40 females, mean age 64.6 ± 10.2 years) with 87 peripheral lung cancer lesions showing GGN (mean long axis diameter, 17 ± 5 mm) underwent computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous MWA. All GGN-like lung cancers were histologically verified. The primary endpoints were local progression-free survival (LPFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were cancer-specific survival (CSS) and complications.

Results

During a median follow-up of 65 months, both the 3-year and 5-year LPFS rates were 96.6% and 96.6%. The OS rate was 94.3% at 3 years and 84.9% at 5 years, whereas the 3-year and 5-year CSS rates were 100% and 100%, respectively. No periprocedural deaths were observed. Complications were observed in 49 patients (51.6%). Grade 3 or higher complications included pneumothorax, pleural effusion, hemorrhage, and pulmonary infection, which were identified in ten (10.5%), two (2.1%), two (2.1%), and one (1.1%) patient, respectively.

Conclusions

CT-guided percutaneous MWA is an effective, safe, and potentially curative treatment regimen for GGN-like lung cancer.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy and thermal ablation for treatment of NSCLC: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

RATIONALE

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is the standard of care for inoperable early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Use of image guided thermal ablation (IGTA; including microwave ablation [MWA] and radiofrequency ablation [RFA]) has increased in NSCLC, however there are no studies comparing all three.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of IGTA (including MWA and RFA) and SBRT for the treatment of NSCLC.

METHODS

Published literature databases were systematically searched for studies assessing MWA, RFA, or SBRT. Local tumor progression (LTP), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed with single-arm pooled analyses and meta-regressions in NSCLC patients and a stage IA subgroup. Study quality was assessed with a modified methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) tool.

RESULTS

Forty IGTA study-arms (2,691 patients) and 215 SBRT study-arms (54,789 patients) were identified. LTP was lowest after SBRT at one and two years in single-arm pooled analyses (4% and 9% vs. 11% and 18%) and at one year in meta-regressions when compared to IGTA (OR = 0.2, 95%CI = 0.07-0.63). MWA patients had the highest DFS of all treatments in single-arm pooled analyses. In meta-regressions at two and three-years, DFS was significantly lower for RFA compared to MWA (OR = 0.26, 95%CI = 0.12-0.58; OR = 0.33, 95%CI = 0.16-0.66, respectively). OS was similar across modalities, timepoints, and analyses. Older age, male patients, larger tumors, retrospective studies, and non-Asian study region were also predictors of worse clinical outcomes. In high-quality studies (MINORS score ≥ 7), MWA patients had better clinical outcomes than the overall analysis. Stage IA MWA patients had lower LTP, higher OS, and generally lower DFS, compared to the main analysis of all NSCLC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

NSCLC patients had comparable outcomes after SBRT and MWA, which were better than those with RFA.

Outcomes following cryoablation of stage IA non-small cell lung cancer in patients with and without interstitial lung disease: A retrospective single-center cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and efficacy of cryoablation of treatment-naïve stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients with and without interstitial lung disease (ILD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective single-center cohort study evaluated 33 consecutive patients (24 females, median age 75 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score 0-3) with ILD (9 patients) and without ILD (24 patients) who underwent 39 percutaneous cryoablations to treat 42 stage IA (8th IASLC edition) NSCLC measuring 1.2 cm (range 0.5-2.6 cm) from 2018 to 2022. Presence of ILD was determined according to 2018 American Thoracic Society Criteria on pre-ablation CT scans. The primary outcome was 90-day adverse events graded by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS), local recurrence-free survival, overall survival, and the cumulative incidence of local recurrence with death as a competing risk.

RESULTS

Adverse events ranged from grade 1-3 and occurred more often in the non-ILD group (p <.001). No acute exacerbation of ILD or death occurred within 90 days after cryoablation. The median LOS was 1 day (interquartile range 1-2 days) and did not differ between groups. One patient with ILD and two patients without ILD died after 22, 26, and 27 months from causes unrelated to cryoablation. Median imaging follow-up was 11 months (range, 0-47 months) and three tumors (7%) showed local recurrence after 4, 17, and 22 months. No difference in the cumulative incidence of local recurrence (p =.56) was found. Among all patients, local recurrence-free survival on a per-tumor basis and overall survival were 97% and 100% at 1 year, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Adverse events and local recurrence following percutaneous cryoablation of stage IA NSCLC did not differ between patients with and without ILD. No acute exacerbation of ILD or death within 90 days were observed.

Primary and Metastatic Lung Cancer: Rationale, Indications, and Outcomes of Thermal Ablation

The widespread use of imaging as well as the efforts conducted through screening campaigns has dramatically increased the early detection rate of lung cancer. Historically, the management of lung cancer has heavily relied on surgery. However, the increased proportion of patients with comorbidities has given significance to less invasive therapeutic options like minimally invasive surgery and image-guided thermal ablation, which could precisely target the tumor without requiring general anesthesia or a thoracotomy. Thermal ablation is considered low-risk for lung tumors smaller than 3 cm that are located in peripheral lung and do not involve major blood vessels or airways. The rationale for ablative therapies relies on the fact that focused delivery of energy induces cell death and pathologic necrosis. Image-guided percutaneous thermal ablation therapies are established techniques in the local treatment of hepatic, renal, bone, thyroid and uterine lesions. In the lung, and specifically in the setting of metastatic disease, the 3 main indications for lung ablation are to serve as (1) curative intent, (2) as a strategy to achieve a chemo-holiday in oligometastatic disease, and (3) in oligoprogressive disease. Following these premises, the current paper aims to review the rationale, indications, and outcomes of thermal ablation as a form of local therapy in the treatment of primary and metastatic lung disease.

Percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation of lung cancer: What is the evidence?

Thermal ablation techniques have now been used for more than twenty years in the treatment of primary lung tumours, predominantly non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although primarily used for the treatment of early-stage disease in non-surgical patients, thermal ablation is now also being used in selected patients with oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease. This review discusses the techniques available for thermal ablation, the evidence for use of thermal ablation in primary lung tumours in early- and advanced-stage disease and compares thermal ablation to alternative treatment strategies.

Thermal ablation versus radiotherapy for inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the survival benefits of thermal ablation (TA) and radiotherapy in inoperable patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was conducted using the data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to balance potential baseline confounding factors. Survival analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods.

RESULTS

The present study included 33,393 inoperable patients with stage III NSCLC, including 106 patients treated with TA and 33,287 patients treated with radiotherapy. No statistical difference in overall survival (OS) (p = .065) or cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p = .996) was found between the patients treated with TA and those treated with radiotherapy. Using 1:3 matching, a matched cohort of 420 patients (105 patients treated with TA, 315 patients treated with radiotherapy) was identified. The differences in OS (p = .177) and CSS (p = .605) were still not significant between the radiotherapy and TA groups after PSM. According to subgroup analyses, TA showed comparable survival benefits in almost all subgroups compared to radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

For inoperable stage III NSCLC, the survival benefit of TA was comparable to radiotherapy. TA may be a potential therapeutic modality for inoperable stage III NSCLC.

Survival benefit of thermal ablation therapy for patients with stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer: A propensity-matched analysis

Background

Thermal ablation (TA) is considered a safe alternative to surgical resection for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While previous studies have shown that TA is beneficial for stage I NSCLC patients, however, few have reported on TA efficacy in patients with stage II-III NSCLC. The current study investigated the impact of TA on the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with stage II-III NSCLC.

Methods

Data on patients with stage II-III NSCLC who did not undergo surgical resection between 2004 and 2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (PSM), Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and Cox regression were used for statistical analyses.

Results

A total of 57,959 stage II-III NSCLC patients who did not undergo surgical resection were included in this study, 261 of whom received TA. Overall, TA was associated with a longer OS (p = 0.035) and CSS (p = 0.005) than non-ablation. After 1:3 PSM, 252 patients receiving TA and 732 patients not receiving ablation were enrolled in the matched cohort. The OS (p = 0.047) and CSS (p = 0.029) remained higher in the TA group than in the non-ablation group after PSM. Cox regression analysis showed that age, sex, primary tumor site, pathological type, tumor size, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and thermal ablation were independently associated with OS and CSS (p <0.05). Subgroup analysis found that the advantages of TA were more pronounced among individuals ≥70 years of age, with tumor size ≤3.0 cm, or who did not receive radiotherapy.

Conclusion

TA could be an effective alternative treatment for stage II-III NSCLC patients unsuitable for surgical resection, particularly those ≥70 years of age, with tumor size ≤3.0 cm, or who have not received radiotherapy.

Safety and efficacy of microwave ablation for lung cancer adjacent to the interlobar fissure

Background

This retrospective study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of microwave ablation for lung tumors adjacent to the interlobar fissures.

Methods

From May 2020 to April 2021, 59 patients with 66 lung tumors (mean diameter, 16.9 ± 7.7 mm; range, 6–30 mm) adjacent to the interlobar fissures who underwent microwave ablation at our institution were identified and included in this study. Based on the relationship between the tumor and the interlobar fissure, tumors can be categorized into close to the fissure, causing the fissure, and involving the fissure. The complete ablation rate, local progression‐free survival, complications, and associated factors were analyzed.

Results

All 66 histologically proven tumors were treated using computed tomography‐guided microwave ablation. The complete ablation rate was 95.5%. Local progression‐free survival at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months were 89.4%, 83.3%, 74.2%, and 63.6%, respectively. The complications included pneumothorax (34.8%), pleural effusion (24.2%), cavity (18.2%), and pulmonary infection (7.6%). There were statistical differences in the incidence of pneumothorax, cavity, and delayed complications between the groups with and without antenna punctures through the fissure.

Conclusions

Microwave ablation is a safe and effective treatment for lung tumor adjacent to the interlobar fissure. Antenna puncturing though the interlobar fissure may be a potential risk factor for pneumothorax, cavity, and delayed complications.

Synchronous Microwave Ablation Combined With Cisplatin Intratumoral Chemotherapy for Large Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background

Microwave ablation (MWA) and intratumoral chemotherapy (ITC) are useful for treating tumors in animal models; however, their clinical use in patients with large non−small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unknown. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate preliminary outcomes of MWA + ITC for large NSCLC.

Methods

From November 2015 to April 2020, a total of 44 NSCLC patients with a mean lesion diameter of 6.1 ± 1.5 cm were enrolled and underwent synchronous MWA + ITC procedures. The primary endpoint was local progression-free survival (LPFS); secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), complications, overall survival (OS), and associated prognostic factors.

Results

The median follow-up time was 19.0 months. At the 1-month CT scan, complete tumor ablation was observed in 47.7% of cases. Median LPFS was 12.1 months; 1-, 2-, and 3-year LPFS rates were 51.2%, 27.9%, and 13.6%, respectively. A shorter LPFS was significantly associated with large lesions (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02–1.49; p = 0.032). Median PFS was 8.1 months; 1-, 2-, and 3-year PFS rates were 29.5%, 18.2%, and 9.1%, respectively. LPFS was significantly superior to PFS (p = 0.046). Median OS was 18.8 months. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 65.9%, 43.2%, 26.4%, and 10.0%, respectively. In univariate comparisons, high performance status (PS) score, smoking, and larger lesions were significantly correlated with poor survival. In multivariate analysis, advanced age, higher PS score, higher stage, larger lesion, and prior systematic treatment were independent prognostic factors for shorter OS. Adverse events were well tolerated and all patients recovered after appropriate intervention.

Conclusions

MWA + ITC is a safe and effective new modality of local treatment for large NSCLC and can significantly prolong LPFS.

The correlation between multimodal radiomics and pathology about thermal ablation lesion of rabbit lung VX2 tumor

Objective

To explore the correlation of CT-MRI pathology with lung tumor ablation lesions by comparing CT, MRI, and pathological performance of rabbit lung VX2 tumor after thermal ablation.

Methods

Thermal ablation including microwave ablation (MWA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was carried out in 12 experimental rabbits with lung VX2 tumors under CT guidance. CT and MRI performance was observed immediately after ablation, and then the rabbits were killed and pathologically examined. The maximum diameter of tumors on CT before ablation, the central hypointense area on T2-weighted image (T2WI) after ablation, and the central hyperintense area on T1-weighted image (T1WI) after ablation and pathological necrosis were measured. Simultaneously, the maximum diameter of ground-glass opacity (GGO) around the lesion on CT after ablation, the surrounding hyperintense area on T2WI after ablation, the surrounding isointense area on T1WI after ablation, and the pathological ablation area were measured, and then the results were compared and analyzed.

Results

Ablation zones showed GGO surrounding the original lesion on CT, with a central hypointense and peripheral hyperintense zone on T2WI as well as a central hyperintense and peripheral isointense zone on T1WI. There was statistical significance in the comparison of the maximum diameter of the tumor before ablation with a central hyperintense zone on T1WI after ablation and pathological necrosis. There was also statistical significance in the comparison of the maximum diameter of GGO around the lesion on CT with the surrounding hyperintense zone on T2WI and isointense on T1WI after ablation and pathological ablation zone. There was only one residual tumor abutting the vessel in the RFA group.

Conclusions

MRI manifestations of thermal ablation of VX2 tumors in rabbit lungs have certain characteristics with a strong pathological association. CT combined with MRI multimodal radiomics is expected to provide an effective new method for clinical evaluation of the immediate efficacy of thermal ablation of lung tumors.

Percutaneous local tumor ablation vs. stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous local tumor ablation (LTA) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) have been regarded as viable treatments for early-stage lung cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of LTA with SBRT for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Ovid, Google scholar, CNKI, and CBMdisc were searched to identify potential eligible studies comparing the efficacy and safety of LTA with SBRT for early-stage NSCLC published between January 1, 1991, and May 31, 2021. Hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were applied to estimate the effect size for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional progression (LP), and adverse events.

RESULTS

Five studies with 22,231 patients were enrolled, including 1443 patients in the LTA group and 20,788 patients in the SBRT group. The results showed that SBRT was not superior to LTA for OS (HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.87-1.22, P = 0.71). Similar results were observed for PFS (HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.71-1.67, P = 0.71) and LP (HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.25-1.77, P = 0.70). Subgroup analysis showed that the pooled HR for OS favored SBRT in patients with tumors sized >2 cm (HR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.14-1.53, P = 0.0003), whereas there was no significant difference in patients with tumors sized ≤2 cm (HR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.64-1.35, P = 0.70). Moreover, no significant differences were observed for the incidence of severe adverse events (≥grade 3) (OR = 1.95, 95% CI: 0.63-6.07, P = 0.25) between the LTA group and SBRT group.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with SBRT, LTA appears to have similar OS, PFS, and LP. However, for tumors >2 cm, SBRT is superior to LTA in OS. Prospective randomized controlled trials are required to determine such findings.

INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER

INPLASY202160099.

A guide for managing patients with stage I NSCLC: deciding between lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, SBRT and ablation-part 4: systematic review of evidence involving SBRT and ablation

Background

Clinical decision-making for patients with stage I lung cancer is complex. It involves multiple options [lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), thermal ablation], weighing multiple outcomes (e.g., short-, intermediate-, long-term) and multiple aspects of each (e.g., magnitude of a difference, the degree of confidence in the evidence, and the applicability to the patient and setting at hand). A structure is needed to summarize the relevant evidence for an individual patient and to identify which outcomes have the greatest impact on the decision-making.

Methods

A PubMed systematic review from 2000-2021 of outcomes after SBRT or thermal ablation vs. resection is the focus of this paper. Evidence was abstracted from randomized trials and non-randomized comparisons with at least some adjustment for confounders. The analysis involved careful assessment, including characteristics of patients, settings, residual confounding etc. to expose degrees of uncertainty and applicability to individual patients. Evidence is summarized that provides an at-a-glance overall impression as well as the ability to delve into layers of details of the patients, settings and treatments involved.

Results

Short-term outcomes are meaningfully better after SBRT than resection. SBRT doesn't affect quality-of-life (QOL), on average pulmonary function is not altered, but a minority of patients may experience gradual late toxicity. Adjusted non-randomized comparisons demonstrate a clinically relevant detriment in long-term outcomes after SBRT vs. surgery. The short-term benefits of SBRT over surgery are accentuated with increasing age and compromised patients, but the long-term detriment remains. Ablation is associated with a higher rate of complications than SBRT, but there is little intermediate-term impact on quality-of-life or pulmonary function tests. Adjusted comparisons show a meaningful detriment in long-term outcomes after ablation vs. surgery; there is less difference between ablation and SBRT.

Conclusions

A systematic, comprehensive summary of evidence regarding Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy or thermal ablation vs. resection with attention to aspects of applicability, uncertainty and effect modifiers provides a foundation for a framework for individualized decision-making.

Survival outcomes of radiofrequency ablation compared with surgery in patients with early-stage primary non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study compared the overall survival (OS) of patients with early-stage primary non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus surgery.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register, and all available Chinese databases to identify relevant publications from inception to April 2019. This meta-analysis compared hazard ratios (HRs) for OS. A multivariate fixed effects model was used to perform a meta-analysis to compare survival between treatments.

RESULTS

Six retrospective studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. Compared with surgery, RFA was associated with a similar long-term OS. The HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for 2-, 3- and 5-year OS were 1.74 [0.82, 3.71], 1.15 [0.65, 2.02] and 2.69 [0.41, 17.47], respectively, while those of the pooled data were 1.47 [0.94, 2.32] in patients with early-stage primary NSCLC.

CONCLUSIONS

RFA did not differ significantly from surgery in terms of the 5-year OS in patients with early-stage primary NSCLC. Randomized, controlled clinical trials are warranted to compare these two treatments.

Microwave Ablation versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

PURPOSE

To assess the cost-effectiveness of microwave ablation (MWA) and SBRT for patients with inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was performed in MEDLINE with broad search clusters. A decision-analysis model was constructed over a 5-year period. The model incorporated treatment-related complications and long-term recurrence. All clinical parameters were derived from the literature with preference to long-term prospective trials. A healthcare payers' perspective was adopted. Outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALY) extracted from prior studies and United States dollars from Medicare reimbursements and prior studies. Base case calculations, probabilistic sensitivity analysis with 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations, and multiple one- and two-way sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

MWA yielded a health benefit of 2.31 QALY at a cost of $195,331, whereas SBRT yielded a health benefit of 2.33 QALY at a cost of $225,271. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $1,480,597/QALY, indicating that MWA is the more cost-effective strategy. The conclusion remains unchanged in probabilistic sensitivity analysis with MWA being the optimal cost strategy in 99.84% simulations. One-way sensitivity analyses revealed that MWA remains cost-effective when its annual recurrence risk is below 18.4% averaged over 5 years, when the SBRT annual recurrence risk is above 1.44% averaged over 5 years, or when MWA is at least $7,500 cheaper than SBRT.

CONCLUSION

Microwave ablation appears to be a more cost-effective than stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

A CT-Based Radiomics Nomogram to Predict Complete Ablation of Pulmonary Malignancy: A Multicenter Study

Objective

Thermal ablation is a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of pulmonary malignancy, but the intraoperative measure of complete ablation of the tumor is mainly based on the subjective judgment of clinicians without quantitative criteria. This study aimed to develop and validate an intraoperative computed tomography (CT)-based radiomic nomogram to predict complete ablation of pulmonary malignancy.

Methods

This study enrolled 104 individual lesions from 92 patients with primary or metastatic pulmonary malignancies, which were randomly divided into training cohort (n=74) and verification cohort (n=30). Radiomics features were extracted from the original CT images when the study clinicians determined the completion of the ablation surgery. Minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were adopted for the dimensionality reduction of high-dimensional data and feature selection. The prediction model was developed based on the radiomics signature combined with the independent clinical predictors by multiple logistic regression analysis. The area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration curves were used to evaluate the predictive performance of the model. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied to estimate the clinical usefulness and net benefit of the nomogram for decision making.

Results

Thirteen CT features were selected to construct radiomics prediction model, which exhibits good predictive performance for determination of complete ablation of pulmonary malignancy. The AUCs of a CT-based radiomics nomogram that integrated the radiomics signature and the clinical predictors were 0.88 (95% CI 0.80-0.96) in the training cohort and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.71–1.00) in the validation cohort, respectively. The radiomics nomogram was well calibrated in both the training and validation cohorts, and it was highly consistent with complete tumor ablation. DCA indicated that the nomogram was clinically useful.

Conclusion

A CT-based radiomics nomogram has good predictive value for determination of complete ablation of pulmonary malignancy intraoperatively, which can assist in decision-making.

Microwave ablation treatment for medically inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancers: long-term results

OBJECTIVES

In the present study, we aim to show the results of microwave ablation (MWA) for medically inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) with long-term follow-up.

METHODS

From Feb 2011 to Mar 2016, patients with histologically proven clinical stage I NSCLC were treated with CT-guided MWA and retrospectively analyzed. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients with 105 lesions underwent MWA. The mean age was 70.7 years (range: 40-86 years), and the mean diameter of all lesions was 2.40 cm (range: 0.9-4.0 cm). Adenocarcinoma was the most common histological type (77, 73.3%), followed by squamous cell carcinomas (21, 20%) and undefined NSCLC (7, 6.7%). With a median follow-up of 54.8 months, the median DFS was 36.0 months, and 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS rates were 89.5%, 49.4%, and 42.7%, respectively. The median CSS and OS were 89.8 and 64.2 months, respectively. The OS rate was 99% at 1 year, 75.6% at 3 years, and 54.1% at 5 years, while the CSS rates were 99%, 78.9%, and 60.9%, respectively. Patients with stage IB lesions had significant shorter DFS (22.3 months vs. undefined, HR: 11.5, 95%CI: 5.85-22.40) and OS (37.3 vs. 89.8 months, HR: 8.64, 95% CI: 4.49-16.60) than IA disease.

CONCLUSION

MWA is a safe, effective, and potentially curative therapy for medically inoperable stage I NSCLC patients.

KEY POINTS

• In this multicenter retrospective study which included 105 patients, we found the median overall survival (OS) was 64.2 months. The OS rate was 99% at 1 year, 75.6% at 3 years, and 54.1% at 5 years. • Procedures were technically successful and well tolerated in all patients. Most MWA complications were mild or moderate.

National Utilization, Survival, and Costs Analysis of Treatment Options for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A SEER-Medicare Database Analysis

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To compare utilization, outcomes, and costs of surgery, radiation therapy, and percutaneous ablation for the treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using 2006-2016 Medicare-linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases, stage I NSCLC patients who underwent surgery, radiotherapy, or percutaneous ablation were identified using relevant billing codes. National utilization rates were determined. Overall survival for treatment arms were compared using log-rank test and Cox-proportional hazard modeling. Mean direct costs for each treatment strategy during the first year after diagnosis were compared using Analysis of Variance.

RESULTS

A total of 15,847 Stage I NSCLC patients were identified; mean age at diagnosis was 75.5 years (minimum age = 66 years) and 59.2% were female. A total of 10,732 patients (67.7%) underwent only surgery, 5013 (31.6%) only radiotherapy, and 102 (0.6%) only ablation. Utilization of surgery and ablation decreased while radiotherapy utilization increased from 2007 to 2015 (p < 0.0001). Compared to the ablation group, overall survival was greater for the surgery group (HR: 0.7, 95% CI of HR: 0.6-0.9, p = 0.0047) and lower for the radiotherapy group (HR: 1.4, 95% CI of HR: 1.1-1.8, p = 0.002). The mean first year cost of therapy for ablation = $11,976) was significantly less (p < 0.05) than for radiotherapy ($15,447) and surgery ($22,669).

CONCLUSION

In Medicare patients with stage I NSCLC, the utilization of radiation therapy has increased and surgery has declined, while utilization of percutaneous ablation has remained uniformly low. Although overall survival is best for surgery, then ablation, and then radiation therapy, first year treatment costs are lowest for ablation.

Percutaneous Image-Guided Ablation of Lung Tumors

Tumors of the lung, including primary cancer and metastases, are notoriously common and difficult to treat. Although surgical resection of lung lesions is often indicated, many conditions disqualify patients from being surgical candidates. Percutaneous image-guided lung ablation is a relatively new set of techniques that offers a promising treatment option for a variety of lung tumors. Although there have been no clinical trials to definitively compare its efficacy to those of traditional treatments, lung ablation is widely practiced and generally accepted to be safe and effective. Especially encouraging results have recently emerged for cryoablation, one of the newer ablative techniques. This article reviews the indications, techniques, contraindications, and complications of percutaneous image-guided ablation of lung tumors with special attention to cryoablation and its recent developments in protocol optimization.

Consensus Guidelines for the Definition of Time-to-Event End Points in Image-guided Tumor Ablation: Results of the SIO and DATECAN Initiative

There is currently no consensus regarding preferred clinical outcome measures following image-guided tumor ablation or clear definitions of oncologic end points. This consensus document proposes standardized definitions for a broad range of oncologic outcome measures with recommendations on how to uniformly document, analyze, and report outcomes. The initiative was coordinated by the Society of Interventional Oncology in collaboration with the Definition for the Assessment of Time-to-Event End Points in Cancer Trials, or DATECAN, group. According to predefined criteria, based on experience with clinical trials, an international panel of 62 experts convened. Recommendations were developed using the validated three-step modified Delphi consensus method. Consensus was reached on when to assess outcomes per patient, per session, or per tumor; on starting and ending time and survival time definitions; and on time-to-event end points. Although no consensus was reached on the preferred classification system to report complications, quality of life, and health economics issues, the panel did agree on using the most recent version of a validated patient-reported outcome questionnaire. This article provides a framework of key opinion leader recommendations with the intent to facilitate a clear interpretation of results and standardize worldwide communication. Widespread adoption will improve reproducibility, allow for accurate comparisons, and avoid misinterpretations in the field of interventional oncology research. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Liddell in this issue.

Image-guided combined ablation and resection in thoracic surgery for the treatment of multiple pulmonary metastases: A preliminary case series

Objectives

To demonstrate the feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a novel hybrid technique combining percutaneous microwave ablation and wire-assisted wedge resection for patients with multiple pulmonary metastases using intraoperative imaging.

Methods

We describe our technique and present a retrospective case series of 4 patients undergoing iCART at our institution between August 2018 and January 2020. Procedures were performed in a hybrid operating suite using the ARTIS Pheno cone beam computerized tomography scanner (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, German). Patient information included past history of malignancy as well as lesion size, depth, location, and histology result. Surgical complications and length of stay were also recorded.

Results

Five procedures were performed on 4 patients during the study period. One patient underwent bilateral procedures 4 weeks apart. All patients underwent at least 1 ablation and 1 wedge resection during the combined procedure. Patient ages ranged from 40 to 66 years and the majority (75%) were men. All had a past history of cancer. Lesions were treated in every lobe. Size and depth ranged from 6 to 24 mm and 21 to 33 mm, respectively, for ablated nodules and 5 to 27 mm and 0 to 22 mm, respectively, for the wedge resected nodules. Three procedures were completed uniportal and operative time ranged from 51 to 210 minutes. All cases sustained <10 mL blood loss. There were 2 intraoperative pneumothorax, 1 prevented successful completion of the ablation. One patient required a prolonged period of postoperative physiotherapy and was discharged on day 6. The other patients were discharged on postoperative day 2 or 3. All 5 histology specimens confirmed metastatic disease.

Conclusions

Our hybrid approach provides a minimally invasive and comprehensive personalized therapy for patients with multiple pulmonary metastases under a single general anesthetic. It provides histology-based diagnosis whilst minimizing lung tissue loss and eliminating the need for transfer from radiology to operating theatre. Emergence of ablation as a treatment for stage 1 non–small cell lung cancer and the expansion of lung cancer screening may widen the application of iCART in the future.

Transbronchial lung parenchyma cryoablation with a novel flexible cryoprobe in an in vivo porcine model

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of transbronchial cryoablation with a novel flexible cryoprobe using nitrogen as the refrigerant in an in vivo porcine model of lung parenchyma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A novel flexible cryoprobe using nitrogen as the refrigerant was used for transbronchial cryoablation of lung parenchyma in six normal female pigs. The cryoprobe was delivered to the distal bronchus in the bilateral porcine lungs via the bronchoscopic working channel under virtual bronchoscopy guidance. The position was confirmed with real-time computed tomography (CT). The whole procedure included two freeze-thaw cycles (15 min and 2 min, respectively). CT images were obtained during cryoablation and at 24 h, one week, two weeks and four weeks after the treatment to assess the effectiveness and safety of the procedure. Ablation zone tissue samples were obtained at 24 h and four weeks after the cryoablation for further histopathological analysis.

RESULTS

All ablation procedures (12/12; 100%) were performed successfully. No major complications occurred during the procedure or the observation period. The ablation zones were clearly depicted on CT with a maximal ablation zone volume at 24 h (21.88 ± 12.61 [SD] cm³) compared to 3.64 ± 2.06 (SD) cm³ and 10.73 ± 3.84 (SD) cm³ at the end of the 1st and 2nd freeze-thaw cycles, respectively (P < 0.001). Histopathological analysis revealed that a coagulative necrotic zone was formed along the target bronchus, with obvious vascular occlusion and hemorrhage 24 h after treatment. The lesions gradually formed fibrosis after four weeks.

CONCLUSION

The novel flexible bronchoscopy-guided cryoablation is a feasible, safe and effective modality in an in vivo porcine model of peripheral normal lung parenchyma, suggesting potential capabilities for the treatment of peripheral lung cancer in humans.

Society of Interventional Radiology Multidisciplinary Position Statement on Percutaneous Ablation of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer and Metastatic Disease to the Lungs: Endorsed by the Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology, the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, and the Society of Interventional Oncology

PURPOSE

To state the Society of Interventional Radiology's position on the use of image-guided thermal ablation for the treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer, recurrent lung cancer, and metastatic disease to the lung.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multidisciplinary writing group, with expertise in treating lung cancer, conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify studies on the topic of interest. Recommendations were drafted and graded according to the updated SIR evidence grading system. A modified Delphi technique was used to achieve consensus agreement on the recommendation statements.

RESULTS

A total of 63 studies, including existing systematic reviews and meta-analysis, retrospective cohort studies, and single-arm trials were identified. The expert writing group developed and agreed on 7 recommendations on the use of image-guided thermal ablation in the lung.

CONCLUSION

SIR considers image-guided thermal ablation to be an acceptable treatment option for patients with inoperable Stage I NSCLC, those with recurrent NSCLC, as well as patients with metastatic lung disease.

Thermal ablation in non-small cell lung cancer: a review of treatment modalities and the evidence for combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, with approximately 1.6 million cancer related deaths each year. Prognosis is best in patients with early stage disease, though even then five-year survival is only 55% in some groups. Median survival for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is 8–12 months with conventional treatment. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has revolutionised the treatment of NSCLC with significant long-term improvements in survival demonstrated in some patients with advanced NSCLC. However, only a small proportion of patients respond to ICI, suggesting the need for further techniques to harness the potential of ICI therapy. Thermal ablation utilizes the extremes of temperature to cause tumour destruction. Commonly used modalities are radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation and microwave ablation (MWA). At present thermal ablation is reserved for curative-intent therapy in patients with localized NSCLC who are unable to undergo surgical resection or stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR). Limited evidence suggests that thermal ablative modalities can upregulate an anticancer immune response in NSCLC. It is postulated that thermal ablation can increase tumour antigen release, which would initiate and upregulated steps in the cancer immunity cycle required to elicit an anticancer immune response. This article will review the current thermal ablative techniques and their ability to modulate an anti-cancer immune response with a view of using thermal ablation in conjunction with ICI therapy.

Is There a Role for Percutaneous Ablation for Early Stage Lung Cancer? What Is the Evidence?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

For patients with early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), thermal ablation (TA) has become in the least two decades an option of treatment used worldwide for patients with comorbidities who are not surgical candidates. Here, we review data published with different TA techniques: radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA) and cryoablation. This paper reviews also the comparison that has been made between TA and stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT).

RECENT FINDINGS

A majority of retrospective studies, the absence of comparative studies, and the variety of techniques make difficult to get evident data. Nevertheless, these stand-alone techniques have demonstrated local efficacy for tumors less than 3 cm and good tolerance on fragile patients. Many recent reviews and database analyses show that outcomes after TA (mainly RFA and MWA) are comparable to SBRT in terms of survival rates. For patients who are unfit for surgery, TA has demonstrated interesting results for safety, benefits in overall survival, and acceptable local control.

Image-guided percutaneous ablation for the treatment of lung malignancies: current state of the art

Image-guided percutaneous lung ablation has proven to be a valid treatment alternative in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma or oligometastatic lung disease. Available ablative modalities include radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, and cryoablation. Currently, there are no sufficiently representative studies to determine significant differences between the results of these techniques. However, a common feature among them is their excellent tolerance with very few complications. For optimal treatment, radiologists must carefully select the patients to be treated, perform a refined ablative technique, and have a detailed knowledge of the radiological features following lung ablation. Although no randomized studies comparing image-guided percutaneous lung ablation with surgery or stereotactic radiation therapy are available, the current literature demonstrates equivalent survival rates. This review will discuss image-guided percutaneous lung ablation features, including available modalities, approved indications, possible complications, published results, and future applications.

[Expert Consensus for Thermal Ablation of Pulmonary Subsolid Nodules (2021 Edition)]

局部热消融技术在肺部结节治疗领域正处在起步与发展阶段，为了肺结节热消融治疗的临床实践和规范发展，由“中国医师协会肿瘤消融治疗技术专家组”“中国医师协会介入医师分会肿瘤消融专业委员会”“中国抗癌协会肿瘤消融治疗专业委员会”“中国临床肿瘤学会消融专家委员会”组织多学科国内有关专家，讨论制定了“热消融治疗肺部亚实性结节专家共识（2021年版）”。主要内容包括：①肺部亚实性结节的临床评估；②热消融治疗肺部亚实性结节技术操作规程、适应证、禁忌证、疗效评价和相关并发症；③存在的问题和未来发展方向。

Effectiveness of Thermal Ablation and Stereotactic Radiotherapy Based on Stage I Lung Cancer Histology

PURPOSE

To assess whether the effectiveness of thermal ablation (TA) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as initial treatments for stage I lung cancer varies depending on the histological subtype.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The 2004-2016 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage I lung cancer treated with TA or SBRT. Patients <18 years, those treated with surgery or chemotherapy, or those with unknown survival and follow-up were excluded. TA and SBRT patients were 1:5 propensity score matched separately for each histological subtype to adjust for confounders. Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Cox models.

RESULTS

A total of 28,425 patients were included (SBRT, n = 27,478; TA, n = 947). TA was more likely to be used in Caucasian patients, those with more comorbidities and smaller neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the lower lobe, and those whose treatment had taken place in the northeastern United States. After propensity score matching, a cohort with 4,085 SBRT and 817 TA patients with balanced confounders was obtained. In this cohort, OS for TA and SBRT was comparable (hazard ratio = 1.07; 95% confidence interval,0.98-1.18; P = .13), although it varied by histological subtypes: higher OS for TA was observed in patients with non-small cell NETs (vs SBRT hazard ratio = 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.95; P = .04). No significant OS differences between TA and SBRT were noted for adenocarcinomas, squamous cell carcinomas, small cell carcinomas, and non-neuroendocrine large cell carcinomas (each, P > .1).

CONCLUSIONS

OS following TA and SBRT for stage I lung cancer is comparable for most histological subtypes, except that OS is longer after TA in non-small cell NETs.

Survival outcomes for surgical resection versus CT-guided percutaneous ablation for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Multiple cohort studies have compared surgical resection with CT-guided percutaneous ablation for patients with stage 1 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the results have been heterogeneous. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare surgery with ablation for stage 1 NSCLC.

METHOD

A search of five databases was performed from inception to 5 July 2020. Studies were included if overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and/or disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between patients treated with surgical resection versus ablation (radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or microwave ablation (MWA)) for stage 1 NSCLC. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of eight studies were included (total 792 patients: 460 resection and 332 ablation). There were no significant differences in 1- to 5-year OS or CSS between surgery versus ablation. There were significantly better 1- and 2-year DFS for surgery over ablation (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.14-4.34; OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.21-5.57 respectively), but not 3- to 5-year DFS. Subgroup analysis demonstrated no significant OS difference between lobectomy and MWA, but there were significantly better 1- and 2-year OS with sublobar resection (wedge resection or segmentectomy) versus RFA (OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.33-6.10; OR 4.54, 95% CI 2.51-8.21, respectively). In the two studies which only included patients with stage 1A NSCLC, pooled outcomes demonstrated no significant differences in 1- to 3-year OS or DFS between surgery versus ablation.

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection of stage 1 NSCLC remains the optimal choice. However, for non-surgical patients with stage 1A, ablation offers promising DFS, CSS, and OS. Future prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted.

KEY POINTS

• Surgical resection of stage 1 NSCLC remains the optimal choice. • In patients with stage 1A NSCLC who are not surgical candidates, CT-guided microwave or radiofrequency ablation may be an alternative which offers promising disease-free survival and overall survival.

Alternatives to Surgery for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Thermal Ablation

Thermal ablation involves the application of heat or cold energy to the lung under image guidance to eradicate tumors. It is indicated for treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer in nonsurgical patients. Ablation technologies have advanced, such that nearly all small tumors can now be treated safely and effectively. Ablation does not cause a lasting decline in pulmonary function tests and may therefore be used to treat multiple synchronous and metachronous lung tumors, a chief advantage over other treatments. Large series with intermediate- and long-term data have been reported showing favorable overall survival, similar to radiation therapy.

Comparative analysis of radiofrequency ablation and resection for colorectal liver metastases in caudate lobe: a retrospective study

Objective: To assess the therapeutic efficiency of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) in the caudate lobe compared with that of surgical resection.Methods: After approved by institutional review board, we retrospectively reviewed 20 patients with caudate CRLM treated by RFA or resection between 2006 and 2017. Comparative analysis was performed based on the different therapies, including patient characteristics, therapeutic outcomes, recurrences, and survivals.Results: During the median follow-up of 7 years (range, 2 -11 years), no differences in complications and recurrences were found between RFA and surgery groups (p > .05). The median overall survival (OS) of patients after RFA and resection were 41 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 23.5-70.5) and 54 months (95% CI 31.1-77.7), respectively (p = .627, hazard radio (HR) 0.7, 95% CI 0.2-2.6). However, OS of resection group was better than that of RFA group for large caudate CRLMs (>3 cm) (p = .042, HR 4.4, 95% CI 0.6-32.6).Conclusions: RFA is a feasible, safe, and effective treatment for CRLM in the caudate. Surgical resection revealed superior outcomes in the treatment of caudate CRLMs, particularly in cases with a hepatic tumor size  >3 cm.

Image-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

Although surgical lobectomy with systematic mediastinal lymph node evaluation is considered as the "gold standard" for management of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), image-guided percutaneous thermal ablation has been increasingly used for medically inoperable patients. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a research-based technique that has the most studies for medically inoperable early-stage NSCLC. Other thermal ablation techniques used to treat pulmonary tumors include microwave ablation (MWA), cryoablation and laser ablation. MWA has several advantages over RFA including reduced procedural time, reduced heat-sink effect, large ablation zones, decreased susceptibility to tissue impedance, and simultaneous use of multiple antennae. This review article highlights the most relevant updates of MWA for the treatment of early-stage NSCLC, including mechanism of action, clinical outcomes, potential complications, the existing technique problems and future directions.

[Advances and Challenges of Local Thermal Ablation in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

非小细胞肺癌（non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC）是原发性肺癌的主要类型，手术切除、放化疗、靶向治疗及免疫治疗等是其主要的治疗模式。近年来，热消融在各期NSCLC的临床应用中受到越来越多的关注。热消融作为一种安全、高效的局部治疗手段，合理的临床应用可以给NSCLC患者带来更多的临床获益。然而其在NSCLC中的应用仍然存在许多尚待研究探讨的问题。本文对近年来热消融在NSCLC中的应用现状作以综述，旨在探讨目前存在的争议问题和未来研究方向。

The evolution of interventional oncology in the 21st century

Interventional oncology (IO) has proven to be highly efficient in the local therapy of numerous malignant tumors in addition to surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Due to the advent of immune-oncology with the possibility of tumor control at the molecular and cellular levels, a system change is currently emerging. This will significantly rule oncology in the coming decades. Therefore, one cannot think about IO in the 21st century without considering immunology. For IO, this means paying much more attention to the immunomodulatory effects of the interventional techniques, which have so far been neglected, and to explore the synergistic possibilities with immuno-oncology. It can be expected that the combined use of IO and immuno-oncology will help to overcome the limitations of the latter, such as limited local effects and a high rate of side-effects. To do this, however, sectoral boundaries must be removed and interdisciplinary research efforts must be strengthened. In case of success, IO will face an exciting future.

[Minimally Invasive Therapies for Early Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

肺癌是目前全球最常见的癌症和癌症死亡的主要原因，其中非小细胞肺癌（non-small-cell lung cancer, NSCLC）约占肺癌总数的85%。随着计算机断层扫描（computed tomography, CT）等影像学筛查手段得到不断普及，肺癌的病理类型从以往以晚期中央型肺鳞癌为主，转变为现在的以早期周围型磨玻璃样结节等为表现的肺腺癌为主。肺癌的早诊早治有着重要意义，而微创介入技术的不断发展完善，使得肺癌治疗有了更多的选择，例如立体定向放射、经皮穿刺消融、支气管介入等。本文将就目前临床常见的这些微创介入治疗的作用原理、优势、不足及展望做一评述。

Choice of Treatment for Stage IA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Ineligible for Surgery: Ablation or Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy?

Purpose: To compare the survival outcomes of ablation and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in inoperable patients with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Patients and Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we identified 6,395 patients with stage IA NSCLC who had complete clinical information from 2004 to 2015. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to determine the propensity score based on the clinical characteristics of patients with stage IA NSCLC. Overall survival (OS) was compared between patients with stage IA NSCLC who were treated with ablation and SBRT after adjusting, stratifying, or matching.

Results: Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated no significant difference in survival curves (log-rank, p>0.05) between the ablation and SBRT groups. Compared with the SBRT group, the hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) of OS was 0.930 (0.817-1.058, p=0.269) in the ablation group on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, similar effects on OS (HR: 0.974, 95% CI: 0.858-1.105, p=0.680) were seen in patients with stage IA NSCLC in both the groups.

Conclusions: This study suggests that survival does not differ significantly between patients with stage IA NSCLC treated with ablation and SBRT. These results will be helpful for patients with stage IA NSCLC who are ineligible for surgery.

Radiofrequency Ablation for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Updated Review of Literature from the Last Decade

This review summarizes the current findings on radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from relevant literature published in the last decade. While most earlier studies included small populations and had short follow-up periods, more robust data have become available owing to prospective or large cohort studies. The reported overall survival rates after RFA for stage I NSCLC were 83-96%, 40-74%, and 23-61% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively, in recent studies. Furthermore, many comparative studies on the outcomes of RFA and stereotactic body radiotherapy have been performed. Most of these studies report no significant difference in survival outcomes between the therapies. Currently, major guidelines define RFA as a reasonable alternative treatment for stage I NSCLC in non-surgical candidates.

Sublobar resection compared with stereotactic body radiation therapy and ablation for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: A National Cancer Database study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the overall survival (OS) outcomes of sublobar resection (SLR) with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or ablation for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients with clinical stage I (T1-T2aN0M0) NSCLC from 2004 to 2014 who were treated with SLR, SBRT, or ablation as the sole treatment were identified from the National Cancer Database. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and evaluated by log-rank test, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression, and propensity score-matched analysis. Relative survival analyses compared with age- and sex-matched US population were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 53,973 patients were identified. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year relative survival rates were 96%, 90%, 84%, and 71% for SLR (n = 30,451); 93%, 78%, 65%, and 46% for SBRT (n = 22,134); and 90%, 73%, 58%, and 37% for ablation (n = 1388). Propensity score matching resulted in 9967 patients in the SBRT group versus 9967 in the SLR group and 1062 patients in the ablation group versus 1984 in the SLR group. After matching, both SBRT (hazard ratio, 1.559; 95% confidence interval, 1.497-1.623; P < .001) and ablation (hazard ratio, 1.906; 95% confidence interval, 1.730-2.101; P < .001) were associated with shorter OS when compared with SLR. These results persisted in patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary results suggest SLR may be associated with longer OS in patients with early-stage NSCLC compared with SBRT or ablation. Future prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trials comparing these treatments are needed to confirm these results.

[Stereotactic body radiotherapy: Passing fad or revolution?]

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a young technology that can deliver a high dose of radiation to the target, utilizing either a single dose or a small number of fractions with a high degree of precision within the body. Various technical solutions co-exist nowadays, with particular features, possibilities and limitations. Health care authorities have currently validated SBRT in a very limited number of locations, but many indications are still under investigation. It is therefore challenging to accurately appreciate the SBRT therapeutic index, its place and its role within the anticancer therapeutic arsenal. The aim of the present review is to provide SBRT definitions, current indications, and summarize the future ways of research. There are three validated indications for SBRT: un-resecable T1-T2 non small cell lung cancer, <3 slow-growing pulmonary metastases secondary to a stabilized primary, and the tumours located close to the medulla. In other situations, the benefit of SBRT is still to be demonstrated. One of the most promising way of research is the ablative treatment of oligo metastatic cancers, with recent studies suggesting a survival benefit. Furthermore, the most recent data suggest that SBRT is safe. Finally, the SBRT combined with immune therapies is promising, since it could theoretically trigger the adaptative anticancer response.

Microwave Ablation in Primary Lung Malignancies

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Eighty-five percent of cases correspond to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and pivotal nonsurgical options for early-stage disease include percutaneous ablation and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Microwave Ablation (MWA) is a locoregional treatment option that has many advantages over radiofrequency ablation and has been able to overcome the limitations of this technique in the treatment of early-stage NSCLC. In this review article, we highlight the current evidence supporting the use of MWA in patients with early-stage NSCLC and discuss the technical considerations of the procedure, including optimal patient selection and planning strategies, as well as the potential complications and reported outcomes. Finally, we mention future trends involving ablation in NSCLC, including its role in combination with SBRT in central tumors, management of post-SBRT local recurrence, and its potential as an adjuvant treatment option for patients with resistance to systemic therapy or in combination with checkpoint inhibitors.

Imaging of Novel Oncologic Treatments in Lung Cancer Part 2: Local Ablative Therapies

Conventional approaches to the treatment of early-stage lung cancer have focused on the use of surgical methods to remove the tumor. Recent progress in radiation therapy techniques and in the field of interventional oncology has seen the development of several novel ablative therapies that have gained widespread acceptance as alternatives to conventional surgical options in appropriately selected patients. Local control rates with stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage lung cancer now approach those of surgical resection, while percutaneous ablation is in widespread use for the treatment of lung cancer and oligometastatic disease for selected other malignancies. Tumors treated with targeted medical and ablative therapies can respond to treatment differently when compared with conventional therapies. For example, after stereotactic body radiation therapy, radiologic patterns of posttreatment change can mimic disease progression, and, following percutaneous ablation, the expected initial increase in the size of a treated lesion limits the utility of conventional size-based response assessment criteria. In addition, numerous treatment-related side effects have been described that are important to recognize, both to ensure appropriate treatment and to avoid misclassification as worsening tumor. Imaging plays a vital role in the assessment of patients receiving targeted ablative therapy, and it is essential that thoracic radiologists become familiar with these findings.