Medical Error, Adverse Events, and Complications in Interventional Radiology: Liability or Opportunity?

Advancements in Interventional Radiology for Managing Hepatic Encephalopathy: A Comprehensive Review

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a complex neuropsychiatric syndrome resulting from liver dysfunction, leading to cognitive, behavioral, and motor impairments. The management of HE has traditionally relied on pharmacological treatments, dietary modifications, and liver transplantation. However, recent advancements in interventional radiology (IR) have introduced minimally invasive procedures that offer promising alternatives. This comprehensive review explores the latest IR techniques, including transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO), portal vein embolization (PVE), and Yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization. The efficacy, clinical outcomes, and potential complications of these techniques are examined through an analysis of current studies and trials. The review highlights the benefits of IR in reducing portal hypertension and improving hepatic blood flow, ultimately alleviating HE symptoms. Additionally, it underscores the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration, ongoing research, and the development of clear patient selection criteria to optimize the use of IR in HE management. By integrating these advancements into clinical practice, healthcare providers can enhance the quality of care and improve outcomes for patients with HE.

Development and Validation of an Electronic Adverse Event Model for Patient Safety Surveillance in Interventional Radiology

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive adverse event (AE) surveillance programs in interventional radiology (IR) are rare. Our aim was to develop and validate a retrospective electronic surveillance model to identify outpatient IR procedures that are likely to have an AE, to support patient safety and quality improvement.

METHODS

We identified outpatient IR procedures performed in the period from October 2017 to September 2019 from the Veterans Health Administration (n = 135,283) and applied electronic triggers based on posyprocedure care to flag cases with a potential AE. From the trigger-flagged cases, we randomly sampled n = 1,500 for chart review to identify AEs. We also randomly sampled n = 600 from the unflagged cases. Chart-reviewed cases were merged with patient, procedure, and facility factors to estimate a mixed-effects logistic regression model designed to predict whether an AE occurred. Using model fit and criterion validity, we determined the best predicted probability threshold to identify cases with a likely AE. We reviewed a random sample of 200 cases above the threshold and 100 cases from below the threshold from October 2019 to March 2020 (n = 20,849) for model validation.

RESULTS

In our development sample of mostly trigger-flagged cases, 444 of 2,096 cases (21.8%) had an AE. The optimal predicted probability threshold for a likely AE from our surveillance model was >50%, with positive predictive value of 68.9%, sensitivity of 38.3%, and specificity of 95.3%. In validation, chart-reviewed cases with AE probability >50% had a positive predictive value of 63% (n = 203). For the period from October 2017 to March 2020, the model identified approximately 70 IR cases per month that were likely to have an AE.

CONCLUSIONS

This electronic trigger-based approach to AE surveillance could be used for patient-safety reporting and quality review.

Dealing with complications in interventional radiology

It is widely accepted that most misadventures, which lead to harm have not occurred because of a single individual but rather due to a failure of process that results in healthcare workers making mistakes. This failure of process and the pervasiveness of adverse events is just as prevalent in Interventional Radiology (IR) as it is in other specialities. The true prevalence and prevailing aetiology of complications in IR are not exactly known as there is a paucity of investigative literature into this area; especially when compared with other more established disciplines such as Surgery. Some IR procedures have a higher risk profile than others. However, published data suggests that many adverse events in IR are preventable (55-84%) and frequently involve a device related complication such as improper usage or malfunction. This article aims to discuss factors that contribute to complications in IR along with tools and strategies for dealing with them to achieve optimal patient outcomes.

Is it a complication or a consequence - a new perspective on adverse outcomes in Interventional Radiology

The aim of the article is to introduce a new term in post-procedural events related to the procedure itself. All the Societies and Councils report these events as complications and they are divided in mild, moderate and severe or immediate and delayed.On the other hand the term error is known as the application of a wrong plan, or strategy to achieve a goal.For the first time, we are trying to introduce the term "consequence"; assuming that the procedure is the only available and the best fit to clinical indication, a consequence should be seen as an expected and unavoidable occurrence of an "adverse event" despite correct technical execution.

Typology, Severity, and Outcomes of Adverse Events Related to Angiographic Equipment-A Ten-Year Analysis of the FDA MAUDE Database

Purpose: Angiographic equipment is a key component of healthcare infrastructure, used for endovascular procedures throughout the body. The literature on adverse events related to this technology is limited. The purpose of this study was to analyze adverse events related to angiographic devices from the US Food and Drug Administration's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. Methods: MAUDE data on angiographic imaging equipment from July 2011 to July 2021 were extracted. Qualitative content analysis was performed, a typology of adverse events was derived, and this was used to classify the data. Outcomes were assessed using the Healthcare Performance Improvement (HPI) and Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) adverse event classifications. Results: There were 651 adverse events reported. Most were near misses (67%), followed by precursor safety events (20.5%), serious safety events (11.2%), and unclassifiable (1.2%). Events impacted patients (42.1%), staff (3.2%), both (1.2%), or neither (53.5%). The most common events associated with patient harm were intra-procedure system shut down, foot pedal malfunction, table movement malfunction, image quality deterioration, patient falls, and fluid damage to system. Overall, 34 (5.2%) events were associated with patient death; 18 during the procedure and 5 during patient transport to another angiographic suite/hospital due to critical failure of equipment. Conclusion: Adverse events related to angiographic equipment are rare; however, serious adverse events and deaths have been reported. This study has defined a typology of the most common adverse events associated with patient and staff harm. Increased understanding of these failures may lead to improved product design, user training, and departmental contingency planning.

Complications related to digital technologies in treating edentulous patients with implant-supported prostheses. Part 1: Digital data collection and surgical planning stages

The treatment of complete or single arch edentulism remains a significant priority for dental clinicians. Patients often request immediate loading for complex complete arch treatments with shorter treatment times and fewer appointments, and digital technologies can be leveraged to provide more effective treatments. This part 1 presentation focuses on the discussion of commonly seen complications related to using digital technologies in treating edentulous patients during the data collection and surgical planning stages. Complications related to digital technologies can be prevented or corrected during these stages, preventing future complications in the clinical (surgical and prosthetic) stages.

A Review of Professional Liability in IR: Sweeping the Mines

Medical professional liability (MPL) is becoming a substantial issue in interventional radiology (IR), with both impact on health care costs and negative psychological effects on physicians. MPL presents special challenges within IR because of the field's complex and innovative therapies that are provided to a diverse group of patients and complicated by the off-label use of devices and drugs that is pervasive in the field. This review discusses the principles and practices to avoid and manage MPLs that are specific to the field of IR.

Nano-embedded medical devices and delivery systems in interventional radiology

Nanomaterials research has significantly accelerated the development of the field of vascular and interventional radiology. The incorporation of nanoparticles with unique and functional properties into medical devices and delivery systems has paved the way for the creation of novel diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for various clinical disorders. In this review, we discuss the advancements in the field of interventional radiology and the role of nanotechnology in maximizing the benefits and mitigating the disadvantages of interventional radiology theranostic procedures. Several nanomaterials have been studied to improve the efficacy of interventional radiology interventions, reduce the complications associated with medical devices, improve the accuracy and efficiency of drug delivery systems, and develop innovative imaging modalities. Here, we summarize the recent progress in the development of medical devices and delivery systems that link nanotechnology in vascular and interventional radiology. This article is categorized under: Diagnostic Tools > Diagnostic Nanodevices Diagnostic Tools > In Vivo Nanodiagnostics and Imaging Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Nanomedicine for Cardiovascular Disease.

Precision interventional radiology

The recent interest in precision medicine among interventionists has led to the establishment of the concept of precision interventional radiology (PIR). This concept focuses not only on the accuracy of interventional operations using traditional image-guided techniques, but also on the comprehensive evaluation of diseases. The invisible features extracted from CT, MRI, or US improve the accuracy and specificity of diagnosis. The integration of multi-omics and molecule imaging provides more information for interventional operations. The development and application of drugs, embolic materials, and devices broaden the concept of PIR. Integrating medicine and engineering brings new image-guided techniques that increase the efficacy of interventional operations while reducing the complications of interventional treatment. In all, PIR, an important part of precision medicine, emphasizing the whole disease management process, including precision diagnosis, comprehensive evaluation, and interventional therapy, maximizes the benefits of patients with limited damage.