Deep Learning Prediction of Survival in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Using Chest Radiographs

Deep learning model integrating radiologic and clinical data to predict mortality after ischemic stroke

Objective

Most prognostic indexes for ischemic stroke mortality lack radiologic information. We aimed to create and validate a deep learning-based mortality prediction model using brain diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and clinical factors.

Methods

Data from patients with ischemic stroke who admitted to tertiary hospital during acute periods from 2013 to 2019 were collected and split into training (n = 1109), validation (n = 437), and internal test (n = 654). Data from patients from secondary cardiovascular center was used for external test set (n = 507). The algorithm for predicting mortality, based on DWI and ADC (DLP_DWI), was initially trained. Subsequently, important clinical factors were integrated into this model to create the integrated model (DLP_INTG). The performance of DLP_DWI and DLP_INTG was evaluated by using time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (TD AUCs) and Harrell concordance index (C-index) at one-year mortality.

Results

The TD AUC of DLP_DWI was 0.643 in internal test set, and 0.785 in the external dataset. DLP_INTG had a higher performance at predicting one-year mortality than premise score in internal dataset (TD- AUC: 0.859 vs. 0.746; p = 0.046), and in external dataset (TD- AUC: 0.876 vs. 0.808; p = 0.007). DLP_DWI and DLP_INTG exhibited strong discrimination for the high-risk group for one-year mortality.

Interpretation

A deep learning model using brain DWI, ADC and the clinical factors was capable of predicting mortality in patients with ischemic stroke.

Survey on Value Elements Provided by Artificial Intelligence and Their Eligibility for Insurance Coverage With an Emphasis on Patient-Centered Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore the opinions on the insurance coverage of artificial intelligence (AI), as categorized based on the distinct value elements offered by AI, with a specific focus on patient-centered outcomes (PCOs). PCOs are distinguished from traditional clinical outcomes and focus on patient-reported experiences and values such as quality of life, functionality, well-being, physical or emotional status, and convenience.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We classified the value elements provided by AI into four dimensions: clinical outcomes, economic aspects, organizational aspects, and non-clinical PCOs. The survey comprised three sections: 1) experiences with PCOs in evaluating AI, 2) opinions on the coverage of AI by the National Health Insurance of the Republic of Korea when AI demonstrated benefits across the four value elements, and 3) respondent characteristics. The opinions regarding AI insurance coverage were assessed dichotomously and semi-quantitatively: non-approval (0) vs. approval (on a 1-10 weight scale, with 10 indicating the strongest approval). The survey was conducted from July 4 to 26, 2023, using a web-based method. Responses to PCOs and other value elements were compared.

RESULTS

Among 200 respondents, 44 (22%) were patients/patient representatives, 64 (32%) were industry/developers, 60 (30%) were medical practitioners/doctors, and 32 (16%) were government health personnel. The level of experience with PCOs regarding AI was low, with only 7% (14/200) having direct experience and 10% (20/200) having any experience (either direct or indirect). The approval rate for insurance coverage for PCOs was 74% (148/200), significantly lower than the corresponding rates for other value elements (82.5%-93.5%; P ≤ 0.034). The approval strength was significantly lower for PCOs, with a mean weight ± standard deviation of 5.1 ± 3.5, compared to other value elements (P ≤ 0.036).

CONCLUSION

There is currently limited demand for insurance coverage for AI that demonstrates benefits in terms of non-clinical PCOs.

CT whole lung radiomic nomogram: a potential biomarker for lung function evaluation and identification of COPD

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography (CT) plays a great role in characterizing and quantifying changes in lung structure and function of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to explore the performance of CT-based whole lung radiomic in discriminating COPD patients and non-COPD patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study was performed on 2785 patients who underwent pulmonary function examination in 5 hospitals and were divided into non-COPD group and COPD group. The radiomic features of the whole lung volume were extracted. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression was applied for feature selection and radiomic signature construction. A radiomic nomogram was established by combining the radiomic score and clinical factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the predictive performance of the radiomic nomogram in the training, internal validation, and independent external validation cohorts.

RESULTS

Eighteen radiomic features were collected from the whole lung volume to construct a radiomic model. The area under the curve (AUC) of the radiomic model in the training, internal, and independent external validation cohorts were 0.888 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.869-0.906], 0.874 (95%CI 0.844-0.904) and 0.846 (95%CI 0.822-0.870), respectively. All were higher than the clinical model (AUC were 0.732, 0.714, and 0.777, respectively, P < 0.001). DCA demonstrated that the nomogram constructed by combining radiomic score, age, sex, height, and smoking status was superior to the clinical factor model.

CONCLUSIONS

The intuitive nomogram constructed by CT-based whole-lung radiomic has shown good performance and high accuracy in identifying COPD in this multicenter study.

Machine learning and deep learning predictive models for long-term prognosis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Machine learning and deep learning models have been increasingly used to predict long-term disease progression in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We aimed to summarise the performance of such prognostic models for COPD, compare their relative performances, and identify key research gaps.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the performance of machine learning and deep learning prognostic models and identify pathways for future research. We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, ProQuest, Scopus, and Web of Science from database inception to April 6, 2023, for studies in English using machine learning or deep learning to predict patient outcomes at least 6 months after initial clinical presentation in those with COPD. We included studies comprising human adults aged 18-90 years and allowed for any input modalities. We reported area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) with 95% CI for predictions of mortality, exacerbation, and decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). We reported the degree of interstudy heterogeneity using Cochran's Q test (significant heterogeneity was defined as p≤0·10 or I2>50%). Reporting quality was assessed using the TRIPOD checklist and a risk-of-bias assessment was done using the PROBAST checklist. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022323052).

FINDINGS

We identified 3620 studies in the initial search. 18 studies were eligible, and, of these, 12 used conventional machine learning and six used deep learning models. Seven models analysed exacerbation risk, with only six reporting AUC and 95% CI on internal validation datasets (pooled AUC 0·77 [95% CI 0·69-0·85]) and there was significant heterogeneity (I2 97%, p<0·0001). 11 models analysed mortality risk, with only six reporting AUC and 95% CI on internal validation datasets (pooled AUC 0·77 [95% CI 0·74-0·80]) with significant degrees of heterogeneity (I2 60%, p=0·027). Two studies assessed decline in lung function and were unable to be pooled. Machine learning and deep learning models did not show significant improvement over pre-existing disease severity scores in predicting exacerbations (p=0·24). Three studies directly compared machine learning models against pre-existing severity scores for predicting mortality and pooled performance did not differ (p=0·57). Of the five studies that performed external validation, performance was worse than or equal to regression models. Incorrect handling of missing data, not reporting model uncertainty, and use of datasets that were too small relative to the number of predictive features included provided the largest risks of bias.

INTERPRETATION

There is limited evidence that conventional machine learning and deep learning prognostic models demonstrate superior performance to pre-existing disease severity scores. More rigorous adherence to reporting guidelines would reduce the risk of bias in future studies and aid study reproducibility.

FUNDING

None.

Deep learning enables automatic adult age estimation based on CT reconstruction images of the costal cartilage

OBJECTIVE

Adult age estimation (AAE) is a challenging task. Deep learning (DL) could be a supportive tool. This study aimed to develop DL models for AAE based on CT images and compare their performance to the manual visual scoring method.

METHODS

Chest CT were reconstructed using volume rendering (VR) and maximum intensity projection (MIP) separately. Retrospective data of 2500 patients aged 20.00-69.99 years were obtained. The cohort was split into training (80%) and validation (20%) sets. Additional independent data from 200 patients were used as the test set and external validation set. Different modality DL models were developed accordingly. Comparisons were hierarchically performed by VR versus MIP, single-modality versus multi-modality, and DL versus manual method. Mean absolute error (MAE) was the primary parameter of comparison.

RESULTS

A total of 2700 patients (mean age = 45.24 years ± 14.03 [SD]) were evaluated. Of single-modality models, MAEs yielded by VR were lower than MIP. Multi-modality models generally yielded lower MAEs than the optimal single-modality model. The best-performing multi-modality model obtained the lowest MAEs of 3.78 in males and 3.40 in females. On the test set, DL achieved MAEs of 3.78 in males and 3.92 in females, which were far better than the MAEs of 8.90 and 6.42 respectively, for the manual method. For the external validation, MAEs were 6.05 in males and 6.68 in females for DL, and 6.93 and 8.28 for the manual method.

CONCLUSIONS

DL demonstrated better performance than the manual method in AAE based on CT reconstruction of the costal cartilage.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Aging leads to diseases, functional performance deterioration, and both physical and physiological damage over time. Accurate AAE may aid in diagnosing the personalization of aging processes.

KEY POINTS

• VR-based DL models outperformed MIP-based models with lower MAEs and higher R2 values. • All multi-modality DL models showed better performance than single-modality models in adult age estimation. • DL models achieved a better performance than expert assessments.

A Deep Learning Model Using Chest Radiographs for Prediction of 30-Day Mortality in Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Development and External Validation

BACKGROUND. Chest radiography is an essential tool for diagnosing community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), but it has an uncertain prognostic role in the care of patients with CAP. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to develop a deep learning (DL) model to predict 30-day mortality from diagnosis among patients with CAP by use of chest radiographs to validate the performance model in patients from different time periods and institutions. METHODS. In this retrospective study, a DL model was developed from data on 7105 patients from one institution from March 2013 to December 2019 (3:1:1 allocation to training, validation, and internal test sets) to predict the risk of all-cause mortality within 30 days after CAP diagnosis by use of patients' initial chest radiographs. The DL model was evaluated in a cohort of patients diagnosed with CAP during emergency department visits at the same institution from January 2020 to March 2020 (temporal test cohort [n = 947]) and in two additional cohorts from different institutions (external test cohort A [n = 467], January 2020 to December 2020; external test cohort B [n = 381], March 2019 to October 2021). AUCs were compared between the DL model and an established risk prediction tool based on the presence of confusion, blood urea nitrogen level, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and age 65 years or older (CURB-65 score). The combination of CURB-65 score and DL model was evaluated with a logistic regression model. RESULTS. The AUC for predicting 30-day mortality was significantly larger (p < .001) for the DL model than for CURB-65 score in the temporal test set (0.77 vs 0.67). The larger AUC for the DL model than for CURB-65 score was not significant (p > .05) in external test cohort A (0.80 vs 0.73) or external test cohort B (0.80 vs 0.72). In the three cohorts, the DL model, in comparison with CURB-65 score, had higher (p < .001) specificity (range, 61-69% vs 44-58%) at the sensitivity of CURB-65 score. The combination of DL model and CURB-65 score, in comparison with CURB-65 score, yielded a significant increase in AUC in the temporal test cohort (0.77, p < .001) and external test cohort B (0.80, p = .04) and a nonsignificant increase in AUC in external test cohort A (0.80, p = .16). CONCLUSION. A DL-based model consisting of initial chest radiographs was predictive of 30-day mortality among patients with CAP with improved performance over CURB-65 score. CLINICAL IMPACT. The DL-based model may guide clinical decision-making in the care of patients with CAP.

Overcoming the Challenges in the Development and Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: A Comprehensive Review of Solutions Beyond Supervised Learning

Artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology is a rapidly developing field with several prospective clinical studies demonstrating its benefits in clinical practice. In 2022, the Korean Society of Radiology held a forum to discuss the challenges and drawbacks in AI development and implementation. Various barriers hinder the successful application and widespread adoption of AI in radiology, such as limited annotated data, data privacy and security, data heterogeneity, imbalanced data, model interpretability, overfitting, and integration with clinical workflows. In this review, some of the various possible solutions to these challenges are presented and discussed; these include training with longitudinal and multimodal datasets, dense training with multitask learning and multimodal learning, self-supervised contrastive learning, various image modifications and syntheses using generative models, explainable AI, causal learning, federated learning with large data models, and digital twins.

Enabling chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosis through chest X-rays: A multi-site and multi-modality study

PURPOSE

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the most common chronic illnesses in the world. Unfortunately, COPD is often difficult to diagnose early when interventions can alter the disease course, and it is underdiagnosed or only diagnosed too late for effective treatment. Currently, spirometry is the gold standard for diagnosing COPD but it can be challenging to obtain, especially in resource-poor countries. Chest X-rays (CXRs), however, are readily available and may have the potential as a screening tool to identify patients with COPD who should undergo further testing or intervention. In this study, we used three CXR datasets alongside their respective electronic health records (EHR) to develop and externally validate our models.

METHOD

To leverage the performance of convolutional neural network models, we proposed two fusion schemes: (1) model-level fusion, using Bootstrap aggregating to aggregate predictions from two models, (2) data-level fusion, using CXR image data from different institutions or multi-modal data, CXR image data, and EHR data for model training. Fairness analysis was then performed to evaluate the models across different demographic groups.

RESULTS

Our results demonstrate that DL models can detect COPD using CXRs with an area under the curve of over 0.75, which could facilitate patient screening for COPD, especially in low-resource regions where CXRs are more accessible than spirometry.

CONCLUSIONS

By using a ubiquitous test, future research could build on this work to detect COPD in patients early who would not otherwise have been diagnosed or treated, altering the course of this highly morbid disease.

AI Improves Nodule Detection on Chest Radiographs in a Health Screening Population: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background The impact of artificial intelligence (AI)-based computer-aided detection (CAD) software has not been prospectively explored in real-world populations. Purpose To investigate whether commercial AI-based CAD software could improve the detection rate of actionable lung nodules on chest radiographs in participants undergoing health checkups. Materials and Methods In this single-center, pragmatic, open-label randomized controlled trial, participants who underwent chest radiography between July 2020 and December 2021 in a health screening center were enrolled and randomized into intervention (AI group) and control (non-AI group) arms. One of three designated radiologists with 13-36 years of experience interpreted each radiograph, referring to the AI-based CAD results for the AI group. The primary outcome was the detection rate, that is, the number of true-positive radiographs divided by the total number of radiographs, of actionable lung nodules confirmed on CT scans obtained within 3 months. Actionable nodules were defined as solid nodules larger than 8 mm or subsolid nodules with a solid portion larger than 6 mm (Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System, or Lung-RADS, category 4). Secondary outcomes included the positive-report rate, sensitivity, false-referral rate, and malignant lung nodule detection rate. Clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups using univariable logistic regression analyses. Results A total of 10 476 participants (median age, 59 years [IQR, 50-66 years]; 5121 men) were randomized to an AI group (n = 5238) or non-AI group (n = 5238). The trial met the predefined primary outcome, demonstrating an improved detection rate of actionable nodules in the AI group compared with the non-AI group (0.59% [31 of 5238 participants] vs 0.25% [13 of 5238 participants], respectively; odds ratio, 2.4; 95% CI: 1.3, 4.7; P = .008). The detection rate for malignant lung nodules was higher in the AI group compared with the non-AI group (0.15% [eight of 5238 participants] vs 0.0% [0 of 5238 participants], respectively; P = .008). The AI and non-AI groups showed similar false-referral rates (45.9% [56 of 122 participants] vs 56.0% [56 of 100 participants], respectively; P = .14) and positive-report rates (2.3% [122 of 5238 participants] vs 1.9% [100 of 5238 participants]; P = .14). Conclusion In health checkup participants, artificial intelligence-based software improved the detection of actionable lung nodules on chest radiographs. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Auffermann in this isssue.