Cardiac MRI and Clinical Follow-up in COVID-19 Vaccine-associated Myocarditis

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and clinical follow-up in patients with clinically suspected myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccination

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) findings and their relationship to longer-term clinical outcomes in patients with suspected myocarditis following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination.

METHODS

Consecutive adult patients who underwent clinically indicated CMR for evaluation of suspected myocarditis following messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA)-based COVID-19 vaccination at a single center between 2021 and 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were classified based on the revised Lake Louise criteria for T1-based abnormalities (late gadolinium enhancement [LGE] or high T1 values) and T2-based abnormalities (regional T2-hyperintensity or high T2 values).

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients were included (64% [57/89] male, mean age 34 ± 13 years, 38% [32/89] mRNA-1273, and 62% [52/89] BNT162b2). On baseline CMR, 42 (47%) had at least one abnormality; 25 (28%) met both T1- and T2-criteria; 17 (19%) met T1-criteria but not T2-criteria; and 47 (53%) did not meet either. The interval between vaccination and CMR was shorter in those who met T1- and T2-criteria (28 days, IQR 8-69) compared to those who met T1-criteria only (110 days, IQR 66-255, p < 0.001) and those who did not meet either (120 days, interquartile range (IQR) 80-252, p < 0.001). In the subset of 21 patients who met both T1- and T2-criteria at baseline and had follow-up CMR, myocardial edema had resolved and left ventricular ejection fraction had normalized in all at median imaging follow-up of 214 days (IQR 132-304). However, minimal LGE persisted in 10 (48%). At median clinical follow-up of 232 days (IQR 156-405, n = 60), there were no adverse cardiac events. However, mild cardiac symptoms persisted in 7 (12%).

CONCLUSION

In a cohort of patients who underwent clinically indicated CMR for suspected myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination, 47% had at least one abnormality at baseline CMR. Detection of myocardial edema was associated with the timing of CMR after vaccination. There were no adverse cardiac events. However, minimal LGE persisted in 48% at follow-up.

Post-acute midterm follow-up cardiac MRI findings and clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 vaccine-associated myocarditis: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Although previous investigations revealed favourable in-hospital outcomes of COVID-19 vaccine-related myocarditis, the mid-term prognosis is still unclear. Hence, we aim to summarise existing evidence on the follow-up imaging and clinical findings in patients with COVID-19 vaccine-related myocarditis.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search in online databases using relevant key terms covering COVID-19 vaccine, myocarditis, follow-up, and cardiac MRI. We included all observational studies that reported cardiac MRI findings of patients with myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination in both acute and follow-up phases. Data on clinical outcomes and cardiac MRI findings were extracted and pooled using a random-effect model.

RESULTS

A total of 27 studies (126 patients) met our eligibility criteria. At the time of follow-up, myocarditis symptoms were resolved in all patients, but abnormal electrocardiography and elevated troponin levels were detected in 18.7% and 3.8% of them, respectively. Median imaging follow-up times varied from 3 to 6.3 months. On follow-up cardiac MRI, the persistence of LGE was observed in 76% (95%CI: 62 to 85%), but its extension declined compared to the baseline in almost all patients. Persistent LGE was accompanied by myocardial edoema in six patients, and it was consistent with myocardial fibrosis (LGE without edoema) in the remaining cases. Mean changes (95%CI) of cardiac MRI left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (%) was +2.97 (+1.59 to +4.34) from baseline.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, although most patients likely experience favourable clinical outcomes without serious complications, cardiac MRI abnormalities, mainly LGE, may persist in a notable proportion of them beyond the acute phase.

COVID-19 vaccine-associated myocarditis: Analysis of the suspected cases reported to the EudraVigilance and a systematic review of the published literature

Background

Myocarditis secondary to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination has been reported in the literature.

Objective

This study aimed to characterize the reported cases of myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccination based on age, gender, doses, and vaccine type from published literature and the EudraVigilance database.

Methods

We performed an analysis in the EudraVigilance database (until December 18, 2021) and a systematic review of published literature for reported cases of suspected myocarditis and pericarditis (until 30th June 2022) after the COVID-19 vaccination.

Results

EudraVigilance database analysis revealed 16,514 reported cases of myocarditis or pericarditis due to the vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines. The cases of myo- or pericarditis were reported predominantly in the age group of 18-64 (n = 12,214), and in males with a male-to-female (M: F) ratio of 1.7:1. The mortality among myocarditis patients was low, with 128 deaths (2 cases per 10.000.000 administered doses) being reported. For the systematic review, 72 studies with 1026 cases of myocarditis due to the vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines were included. The analysis of published cases has revealed that the male gender was primarily affected with myocarditis post-COVID-vaccination. The median (IQR) age of the myocarditis cases was 24.6 [19.5-34.6] years, according to the systematic review of the literature. Myocarditis cases were most frequently published after the vaccination with m-RNA vaccines and after the second vaccination dose. The overall mortality of published cases was low (n = 5).

Conclusion

Myocarditis is a rare serious adverse event associated with a COVID-19 vaccination. With early recognition and management, the prognosis of COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis is favorable.

SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and myocarditis

The development of safe and effective vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was a major turning point in the fight against the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, pharmacovigilance has revealed a small but significant incidence of cardiac inflammation manifesting clinically as myocarditis or pericarditis, particularly in younger vaccine recipients. The incidence is the highest among men under age 40 within a week of receiving the second dose of the mRNA vaccine. In this review, we summarise the evidence for, and guidelines in relation to, SARS-CoV2 vaccine-related myocarditis.

Imaging Acute and Chronic Cardiac Complications of COVID-19 and after COVID-19 Vaccination

COVID-19 is associated with acute and longer-term cardiovascular manifestations including myocardial injury, myopericarditis, stress-induced cardiomyopathy, myocardial infarction, and thromboembolic disease. Although the morbidity and mortality related to acute COVID-19 have decreased substantially, there is growing concern about the longer-term cardiovascular effects of the disease and postacute sequelae. Myocarditis has also been reported after messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA)-based COVID-19 vaccination, with the highest risk among adolescent boys and young adult men. Noninvasive imaging including cardiac MRI has a key role in identifying the presence of cardiovascular disease, evaluating for potential mechanisms of injury, stratifying risk of future adverse cardiovascular events, and potentially guiding treatment in patients with suspected cardiovascular injury after COVID-19 and vaccination. Patterns of injury identified at cardiac MRI after COVID-19 include myocarditis and pericarditis, myocardial ischemia, and infarction. Myocardial edema and late gadolinium enhancement have been described months after the initial infection in a minority of patients with persistent cardiac symptoms after COVID-19. In patients with myocarditis after receiving a COVID-19 vaccination, the most common pattern of late gadolinium enhancement is subepicardial at the basal inferolateral wall, and patients tend to have milder imaging abnormalities compared with those from other causes of myocarditis. This article describes the role of multimodality cardiac imaging and imaging findings in patients with acute and longer-term cardiovascular manifestations of COVID-19 and in patients with myocarditis after receiving an mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination. ©RSNA, 2023 Online supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cardiovascular Manifestations Following COVID-19

Globally, over 650 million people have had COVID-19 due to infection with the SARS-Cov-2 virus. Cardiac complications in the acute infectious and early recovery phase were recognized early in the pandemic, including myocardial injury and inflammation. With a decrease in the number of acute COVID-19 related deaths, there has been increased interest in postacute sequela of COVID-19 (PASC) and other longer-term cardiovascular complications. A proportion of patients recovered from COVID-19 have persistent cardiac symptoms and are at risk of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular imaging, including MRI, plays an important role in the detection of cardiovascular manifestations of COVID-19 in both the acute and longer-term phases after COVID-19. The purpose of this review is to highlight the role of cardiovascular imaging in the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with acute and chronic cardiovascular manifestations of COVID-19 with a focus on cardiac MRI. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 4. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging Highlights 2022

Since its inaugural issue in 2019, Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging has disseminated the latest scientific advances and technical developments in cardiac, vascular, and thoracic imaging. In this review, we highlight select articles published in this journal between October 2021 and October 2022. The scope of the review encompasses various aspects of coronary artery and congenital heart diseases, vascular diseases, thoracic imaging, and health services research. Key highlights include changes in the revised Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System 2.0, the value of coronary CT angiography in informing prognosis and guiding treatment decisions, cardiac MRI findings after COVID-19 vaccination or infection, high-risk features at CT angiography to identify patients with aortic dissection at risk for late adverse events, and CT-guided fiducial marker placement for preoperative planning for pulmonary nodules. Ongoing research and future directions include photon-counting CT and artificial intelligence applications in cardiovascular imaging. Keywords: Pediatrics, CT Angiography, CT-Perfusion, CT-Spectral Imaging, MR Angiography, PET/CT, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation/Replacement (TAVI/TAVR), Cardiac, Pulmonary, Vascular, Aorta, Coronary Arteries © RSNA, 2023.

Multimodality Cardiac Imaging in COVID

Infection with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID, is associated with numerous potential secondary complications. Global efforts have been dedicated to understanding the myriad potential cardiovascular sequelae which may occur during acute infection, convalescence, or recovery. Because patients often present with nonspecific symptoms and laboratory findings, cardiac imaging has emerged as an important tool for the discrimination of pulmonary and cardiovascular complications of this disease. The clinician investigating a potential COVID-related complication must account not only for the relative utility of various cardiac imaging modalities but also for the risk of infectious exposure to staff and other patients. Extraordinary clinical and scholarly efforts have brought the international medical community closer to a consensus on the appropriate indications for diagnostic cardiac imaging during this protracted pandemic. In this review, we summarize the existing literature and reference major societal guidelines to provide an overview of the indications and utility of echocardiography, nuclear imaging, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of cardiovascular complications of COVID.

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging T1 and T2 Mapping in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Relation to Antimalarial Treatment

PURPOSE

Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are at risk of cardiac disease including antimalarial-induced cardiomyopathy (AMIC). The purpose of this study is to evaluate cardiac magnetic resonance imaging parametric mapping findings in SLE patients with AMIC and investigate the relationship of T1/T2 mapping to antimalarial (AM) treatment duration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients with SLE who had undergone cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with T1/T2 mapping for evaluation of suspected cardiac disease between 2018 and 2021 were evaluated and compared with healthy controls. To facilitate comparison between scanners, T1/T2 values were converted to a z -score using scanner-specific local reference values. Patients were classified into 3 groups: AMIC, myocarditis, and other (no AMIC or myocarditis).

RESULTS

Forty-five SLE patients (47±17 y, 80% female; 8 [18%] with AMIC and 7 [16%] with myocarditis) and 30 healthy controls (39±15 y, 60% female) were included. Patients with AMIC had higher T1 and T2 compared with controls ( z -score 1.1±1.3 vs. 0±0.6, P =0.01 and 1.7±1.1 vs. 0±1.0, P <0.01, respectively) and lower values compared with those with myocarditis (3.7±1.6, P <0.01 and 4.0±2.0, P <0.01, respectively). T1 correlated negatively with AM treatment duration in patients without AMIC or myocarditis ( r =-0.36, P =0.048) and positively in patients with AMIC ( r =0.92, P =0.001). AM treatment duration did not correlate significantly with T1 in patients with myocarditis or with T2 in any group.

CONCLUSIONS

The relationship between T1 and AM treatment duration differed between groups. Native T1 decreases with longer treatment in patients without AMIC or myocarditis, possibility due to glycosphingolipid accumulation. In patients with AMIC, increasing T1 with longer treatment could reflect fibrosis.

Myocardial Inflammation on FDG PET/MRI and Clinical Outcomes in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Participants after COVID-19 Vaccination

Purpose

To evaluate potential cardiac sequelae of COVID-19 vaccination at 2-month follow-up and relate cardiac symptoms to myocardial tissue changes on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/MRI, blood biomarkers, health-related quality of life, and adverse outcomes.

Materials and Methods

In this prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04967807), a convenience sample of individuals aged ≥17 years were enrolled after COVID-19 vaccination and were categorized as symptomatic myocarditis (new cardiac symptoms within 14 days of vaccination and met diagnostic criteria for acute myocarditis), symptomatic no myocarditis (new cardiac symptoms but did not meet criteria for myocarditis), and asymptomatic (no new cardiac symptoms). Standardized evaluation was performed 2 months after vaccination, including cardiac fluorine 18 FDG PET/MRI, blood biomarkers, and health-related quality of life. Statistical analysis included Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher exact tests.

Results

Fifty-four participants were evaluated a median of 72 days (IQR: 42, 91) after COVID-19 vaccination, 17 symptomatic with myocarditis (36±[SD]15 years, 13 males), 17 symptomatic without myocarditis (42±12 years, 7 males), and 20 asymptomatic (45±14 years, 9 males). No participants in the symptomatic without myocarditis or asymptomatic groups had focal FDG-uptake, myocardial edema or impaired ventricular function. Two participants with symptomatic myocarditis had focal FDG-uptake, and three had high T2 on MRI. Health-related quality of life was lower in the symptomatic myocarditis group than the asymptomatic group. There were no adverse cardiac events beyond myocarditis in any participant.

Conclusions

At two-month follow-up, FDG PET/MRI showed evidence of myocardial inflammation in 2/17 participants diagnosed with acute myocarditis early after COVID-19 vaccination, but not in symptomatic and asymptomatic participants without acute myocarditis.Keywords: Myocarditis, Vaccination, COVID-19, PET/MRI, Cardiac MRI, FDG-PET.

Short term outcome of myocarditis and pericarditis following COVID-19 vaccines: a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study

To evaluate clinical and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) short-term follow-up (FU) in patients with vaccine-associated myocarditis, pericarditis or myo-pericarditis (VAMP) following COVID-19 vaccination. We retrospectively analyzed 44 patients (2 women, mean age: 31.7 ± 15.1 years) with clinical and CMR manifestations of VAMP, recruited from 13 large tertiary national centers. Inclusion criteria were troponin raise, interval between the last vaccination dose and onset of symptoms < 25 days and symptoms-to-CMR < 20 days. 29/44 patients underwent a short-term FU-CMR with a median time of 3.3 months. Ventricular volumes and CMR findings of cardiac injury were collected in all exams. Mean interval between the last vaccination dose and the onset of symptoms was 6.2 ± 5.6 days. 30/44 patients received a vaccination with Comirnaty, 12/44 with Spikevax, 1/44 with Vaxzevria and 1/44 with Janssen (18 after the first dose of vaccine, 20 after the second and 6 after the "booster" dose). Chest pain was the most frequent symptom (41/44), followed by fever (29/44), myalgia (17/44), dyspnea (13/44) and palpitations (11/44). At baseline, left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF) was reduced in 7 patients; wall motion abnormalities have been detected in 10. Myocardial edema was found in 35 (79.5%) and LGE in 40 (90.9%) patients. Clinical FU revealed symptoms persistence in 8/44 patients. At FU-CMR, LV-EF was reduced only in 2 patients, myocardial edema was present in 8/29 patients and LGE in 26/29. VAMPs appear to have a mild clinical presentation, with self-limiting course and resolution of CMR signs of active inflammation at short-term follow-up in most of the cases.

Cardiac Imaging in Myocarditis: Current Evidence and Future Directions

Myocarditis is defined as a non-ischemic inflammatory disease of the myocardium. It remains a challenge to diagnose given non-specific symptoms and lack of specific blood biomarkers. Cardiac imaging plays an important role in the evaluation of myocarditis with unique strengths and limitations of different imaging modalities, including cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, and positron emission tomography. The purpose of this review is to discuss the strengths and limitations of various cardiac imaging techniques in the evaluation of myocarditis, review imaging findings in specific causes of myocarditis including COVID-19 and after vaccination, evaluate the role of imaging in differentiating myocarditis from potential mimics and differential considerations, identify current gaps in knowledge, and propose future directions.

[Myocarditis related SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination: an expert consensus statement on its diagnosis and management]

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has revealed several cardiovascular complications, including myocarditis caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) or after messenger RNA vaccines. The high prevalence of COVID-19, vaccination programs expansion, and the appearance of new information regarding myocarditis in these contexts make it necessary to condense the knowledge acquired since the pandemic began. With this aim, the Myocarditis Working Group of the Heart Failure Association of the Spanish Society of Cardiology, with the collaboration of the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products (AEMPS), has written this document. It aims to address the diagnosis and treatment of cases of myocarditis-associated SARS-CoV-2 infection or messenger RNA vaccine.

A narrative review of vaccine pharmacovigilance during mass vaccination campaigns: Focus on myocarditis and pericarditis after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination

Vaccines have had a tremendous impact on reducing the burden of infectious diseases; however, they have the potential to cause adverse events following immunization (AEFIs). Prelicensure clinical trials are limited in their ability to detect rare AEFIs that may occur in less than one per thousand individuals. While postmarketing surveillance systems have shown COVID-19 mRNA vaccines to be safe, they led to the identification of rare cases of myocarditis and pericarditis after COVID-19 vaccination that were not initially detected in clinical trials. In this narrative review, we highlight concepts of vaccine pharmacovigilance during mass vaccination campaigns and compare the approaches used in the context of myocarditis and pericarditis following COVID-19 vaccination to historical examples. We describe mechanisms of passive and active surveillance, their strengths and limitations, and how they interacted to identify and characterize the safety signal of myocarditis and pericarditis after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. Articles were synthesized from a PubMed search using relevant keywords for articles published on vaccine surveillance systems and myocarditis and pericarditis after COVID-19 vaccination, as well as the authors' collections of relevant publications and grey literature reports. The global experience around the identification and monitoring of myocarditis and pericarditis after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination has provided important lessons for vaccine safety surveillance and highlighted its importance in maintaining public trust in mass vaccination programmes in a pandemic context.

Cardiac magnetic resonance follow-up of COVID-19 vaccine associated acute myocarditis

BACKGROUND

Mass COVID-19 vaccination campaigns have helped impede the COVID-19 pandemic. In rare cases, some vaccines have led to vaccine associated myocarditis in a specific subset of the population, usually young males. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) can reliably diagnose vaccine associated myocarditis, but follow-up data of CMR proven acute myocarditis is scarce.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nine patients with acute vaccine associated myocarditis underwent baseline and follow-up CMR examinations and were compared to baseline parameters at initial presentation and to a group of 20 healthy controls. CMR protocol included functional assessment, T1 and T2 mapping, T2 signal intensity ratio, strain feature tracking, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE).

RESULTS

Myocarditis patients (n = 9, aged 24 ± 6 years, 8 males) underwent CMR follow-up after an average of 5.8 ± 4.3 months. All patients showed a complete resolution of visual myocardial edema while also demonstrating a reduction in overall LGE extent from baseline to follow-up (4.2 ± 2.1 vs. 0.9 ± 0.8%, p < 0.001), although visual LGE was still noted in all patients. Left ventricular ejection fraction was normal at baseline and at follow-up (58 ± 6 vs. 62 ± 4%, p = 0.10) as well as compared to a healthy control group (60 ± 4%, p = 0.24). T1 (1024 ± 77 vs. 971 ± 34 ms, p = 0.05) and T2 relaxations times (57 ± 6 vs. 51 ± 3 ms, p = 0.03) normalized at follow-up. Most patients reported a resolution of clinical symptoms, while two (22%) reported new onset of exertional dyspnea.

CONCLUSION

Patients with COVID-19 vaccine associated acute myocarditis showed a complete, uncomplicated resolution of myocardial inflammation on follow-up CMR, which was associated with a near complete resolution of symptoms. Minor, residual myocardial scarring was present on follow-up LGE imaging. The long-term implications of the remaining myocardial scar-tissue after vaccine associated myocarditis remain unknown warranting further studies.